Now is the time to look much more closely at The Great Reset, a fake Utopia being sold to us by charlatans - "The term rose to prominence at the 50th annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in June 2020. It was initially launched by the Prince of Wales, before being absorbed into the philosophy of the sartorially dystopian sci-fi villain Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the WEF. The Great Reset refers to a plan to rebuild the world’s infrastructure ‘in a sustainable way’ following the economic ravages of the Covid-19 pandemic and to establish a global treaty to prevent future pandemics, or as it is described more formally, to “build a more robust international health architecture that will protect future generations.” If you ever hear people talking about “building back better,” they are referring to The Great Reset. Probably the most disturbing part of The Great Reset is how much it strongly resembles business-as-usual, only with EXTRA globalism. Most of the plan’s outlines include a further weakening of national boundaries and individual national autonomy, in favour of a more ‘universal governance.’ As usual, it is the rapidly vanishing Western middle class which must shoulder this burden, as their freedoms are further curtailed to meet the quotas of corporate-media-fuelled activism... As a rule, it seems their solutions to specific environmental or scientific problems mysteriously become entwined with LGBTQ+ rights, workplace equity, open borders initiatives and other unrelated social justice causes. It’s as though any goals they have are somehow unilaterally from the same source, or entail the same solution, regardless of causality or consequence. Therefore, a united response to a global pandemic mysteriously also equals trans rights activism. In their own words, “No single government or multilateral agency can address this (pandemic) threat alone. Together, we must be better prepared to predict, prevent, detect, assess and effectively respond to pandemics in a highly co-ordinated fashion.” There are many other sweeping sentiments expressed by Schwab and his acolytes which can seem either trite or threatening. Consider “the gulf between what markets value and what people value will close” and “we want more attention paid to scientific experts. No one can “self-isolate” from climate change so we all need to “act in advance and in solidarity.” There is much talk of the pursuit of “fairer and equitable outcomes.” International treaties always tend to be about concentrating power. It’s one of those rules of life, for realists, as there is no escaping power dynamics in human affairs. Real problems don’t often have feel-good solutions. Often, they require ‘solutions that sound mean’, that don’t sound good on a corporate goals bulletin. Initiatives like The Great Reset all entail the gradual loss of the autonomy of individual nations, as their decision-making power is transferred to an international, disembodied rule-maker. It has been, without a doubt, a globalist fantasy for a long time, but the key question is: do they realise what they are doing or not? As far as their amazing coordinated pandemic response goes, this appears to be nothing more than forced world-wide vaccinations for EVERYBODY. According to Klaus Schwab himself: “As long as not everybody is vaccinated, nobody will be safe.” To which the attendant neo-liberal world leaders nodded in re-affirming unison, repeating in unison their mantra: “Global public good.”... Despite the fact that the WEF and Davos and all associated entities are entirely elite institutions, the website styles itself on grassroots urban activism. There is much cringeworthy symbology in its white papers, such as a green and rainbow flag-combination with fey slogans like ‘we salute you, zoom queen!’... It appears at best to be all be smoke and mirrors, a childish corporate fantasy manufactured by isolated bean counters. At worst, it is an intentional power-grab by unaccountable international agencies and hidden oligarchs. Either way, it is a fake utopia at the price of privacy and autonomy, sold to us by used-car salesmen who think they are princes."
Meat, Plane Rides, and Clothes Are Gone in 2030, Say WEF Commie Prags - "For starters, you’ll eat roughly 35 lbs. of meat per year under the WEF’s “progressive” goal. That’s down from the 252 lbs. of meat the average American consumes annually as of today, which means our meat consumption will be roughly 14% of what it normally is. If the misers at the WEF hit their “ambitious” goal, you won’t taste another steak again as of 2030. The WEF is also keen on digital currency — it makes it way easier for them to control what you buy. They don’t want you buying things they find “less desirable,” like ammunition. Don’t take my word for it — listen to one of the tyrants tell you himself. You may want to take up sewing. If the WEF meets its “progressive” goal in regard to new clothing, you’ll only purchase eight new articles of clothing per year. And if they hit their “ambitious” goal, you’ll only get three articles. Does that include socks and underwear?... What about travel? Our new fuhrers will graciously allow us to take one flight — up to 950 miles — every two years, but they prefer to get us to a point where we only fly every three years. As PJ Media’s own Catherine Salgado reported, the Marxists also plan to take your cars away. How will we get around? We won’t. They will lock us down at their will, and we’ll be too protein-deprived to fight back. And if you complain, you won’t get your yearly socks stipend, you planet-killing enemy of the state."
GOLDSTEIN: The World Economic Forum is not our friend | Toronto Sun - "Critics have pointed out Stephen Harper spoke at the WEF when he was PM, to mock Poilievre’s pledge and accuse him of promoting conspiracy theories. But Harper’s view of the WEF, founded by German economist Klaus Schwab in 1971, changed over the years. He did speak twice at the WEF while PM. He praised Schwab for creating it and described it, in its origins, as an “outstanding organization” and a “remarkable event” in his 2018 book, Right Here, Right Now — Politics and Leadership in the Age of Disruption. But he also described the WEF today, as “a bit disturbing. “In recent years, Davos has taken on an atmosphere of elitism that would be hard to surpass,” Harper wrote. “Gathering at Davos’ remote location and high elevation, many of its attendees seem to view themselves as some kind of supreme world council, casting judgments on whether nations and their leaders measure up. You can see it in the press reports. “The one commonality in virtually all the new, populist or disruptive political movements of recent years is their suspicion of such ‘globalism’ and their appeal to nationalism and the national community. “The citizens who support these parties are not just frustrated with particular policies or economic outcomes; they simply do not trust the elites who support globalization. They believe such ‘globalists’ do not share their values and do not care about their interests. And, too often, they are right.” It’s clear Poilievre is appealing to this sense of frustration shared by many Canadians, and to mock him for doing so is to mock them. So, no, the WEF — which I covered as a reporter when then Ontario premier David Peterson led a provincial delegation there more than three decades ago— is not a globalist conspiracy. It has no power in and of itself. But it is an incubator for a globalist agenda that many Canadians profoundly distrust — such as fixing the climate by paying a tax, and other measures championed by the late Maurice Strong — a Canadian who was both a founder of the WEF and the founding executive director of the UN Environment Programme."
The fact that this article was written by a Jew won't convince the anti-Semites that not all Jews support globalism
Wide Awake Media on X - "World Economic Forum founder, Klaus Schwab, speaking at the World Government Summit in March 2022: "History is truly at a turning point. Global energy systems, food systems and supply chains will be deeply affected. In times of crisis, the role of governments is more important and more relevant than ever. The profound challenges to mankind such as climate change, are globally interconnected and require collaborative responses." Translation: Due to our manufactured energy crisis, contrived food shortages and deliberate sabotage of global supply chains, we must grant governments more authoritarian powers over the lives of the peasant class, while simultaneously exploiting the imaginary "climate emergency" to replace national sovereignty and representative democracy with one world government, ruled by unelected, unaccountable and unremovable technocrats."
WEF ranks “misinformation” as the top global threat - "In its annual ranking of global threats, the World Economic Forum has declared that the top issues endangering the world are misinformation and disinformation. "
Nate Silver on X - "If the experts think that misinformation is a bigger problem than war, then a way bigger problem than misinformation is that the experts are fucking idiots."
War was #5, also behind extreme weather, societal polarisation and cyber insecurity
Analyzing Bizarre Tribal Ritual at World Economic Forum 2024
Matt Walsh on X - "A few years ago the elites were telling us to wear masks and stay 6 feet apart. Now they’re bringing in a native woman to cough directly in their faces."
James Lindsay, anti-Fascist on X - "Haha this is a humiliation ritual. Look how those idiots just sit there and take it. They're "elites.""
Ian Miles Cheong on X - "Going to Davos and telling them they are the problem seems to be gaining popularity this year. "You are part of the problem, you are not the solution". This is the first time I can recall people like Javier Milei and now also Kevin Roberts, going on stage and directly telling them that."
World Economic Forum calls to reduce private vehicles by eliminating 'ownership'
Climate change is a good excuse to control people
At Davos, leaders talked big on rebuilding trust. Can the World Economic Forum make a difference? - "“the phaseout of fossil fuels is essential and inevitable" he added. “No amount of spin or scare tactics will change that.”"
Plotting to make everyone's lives harder will rebuild trust, naturally
Of course, climate change hysteria is not spin or scare tactics
Wide Awake Media on X - "Now they're coming for your coffee. Swiss banker and World Economic Forum "agenda contributor", Hubert Keller: "The coffee that we all drink emits between 15 and 20 tonnes of CO2 per tonne of coffee... Every time we drink coffee, we are basically putting CO2 into the atmosphere.""
Wide Awake Media on X - "Author of 'The Great Reset', Marc Morano, on Klaus Schwab's recent B20 speech: "He's talking about us essentially giving up national sovereignty, giving up individual freedoms, and turning over rule to experts... This whole agenda is to make it so we have no choice on some of the biggest questions of our lives." "We didn't get to vote on whether gas powered cars would be banned, we didn't vote for vaccine mandates, we didn't vote for lockdowns, we didn't vote for banning of meat. But all of this is happening, because at these meetings like the World Economic Forum and the United Nations, they meet and they work with government-corporate collusion to bypass democracy and impose stuff through this corporate government fascism.""
We Got It on X - "The World Economic Forum’s Yuval Harari’s infamous line: “Humans are Useless Eaters” and Bill Gates’… “We need to reduce the Population…” #WEF #WEFAgenda2030"
Richard Hanania on X - "Rightoids think Klaus Schwab runs the world, meanwhile he’s getting dragged in the WSJ for letting N-bombs fly and telling women they’re pretty, while telling others they’re fat. The press wants us to believe that any woman can resist Klaus. Liars."
John Kerry says First Amendment is the enemy, as elites try to stamp out free speech - "If you want to know how hostile the global elite are to free speech, look no further than John Kerry’s recent speech to the World Economic Forum. Rather than extol the benefits of democratic liberty versus dictatorships and oligarchs, Kerry called the First Amendment a “major block” to keeping people from believing the “wrong” things... The “freedom” to be won in this election is to liberate officials who like himself can set about controlling what can be said, read or heard. Kerry insisted that the problem with social media is that no one is controlling what they can say or read... “Democracies around the world now are struggling with the absence of a sort of truth arbiter, and there’s no one who defines what facts really are.” It is not clear when in our history we allowed “referees” to “determine what is a fact.” Since the First Amendment has been in place since 1791, it is hard to imagine when referees were used in conformity with our Constitution. The Founders would have been repulsed by the idea of a “truth arbiter.” Yet it was a pitch that clearly went over big at the crowd at the World Economic Forum... The greatest irony was that, after fearmongering about this supposed parade of horribles that comes from free speech, Kerry insisted, “If we could strip away some of the fearmongering that’s taking place and get down to the realities of what’s here for people, this is the biggest economic opportunity.”... In my new book on free speech, I discuss the growing anti-free speech movement being led by law professors and supported by both politicians and journalists. They include Michigan law professor and MSNBC commentator Barbara McQuade, who has called free speech America’s “Achilles’ heel.” Columbia law professor Tim Wu, a former Biden White House aide, wrote an op-ed declaring “The First Amendment Is Out of Control.” He explained that free speech “now mostly protects corporate interests” and threatens “essential jobs of the state, such as protecting national security and the safety and privacy of its citizens.” George Washington University Law’s Mary Ann Franks complains that the First Amendment (and also the Second) is too “aggressively individualistic” and endangers “domestic tranquility” and “general welfare.” Kerry hit all of the top talking points for the anti-free speech movement. He portrayed the First Amendment as hopelessly out of date and dangerous. He argued that citizens would be far better off if an elite could tell them what was information and what was disinformation. Other political contemporaries are working on the same problem. Hillary Clinton has called upon Europeans to use the Digital Services Act to force the censoring of Americans. She has also suggested the arrest of Americans whom she views as spreading disinformation. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has called for companies like Amazon to use enlightened algorithms to steer readers to “true” books on subjects like climate change to protect them from their own poor reading choices. Kerry explained how the true heroes are those poor suffering government officials seeking to protect citizens from unbridled, unregulated thoughts... There is, of course, another possibility: that there is no existential danger of disinformation. Rather there are powerful figures who want to control speech in the world for their own purposes. These are the same rationales and the same voices that have been throughout our history for censorship. Each generation of government officials insists that they face some unprecedented threat, whether it was the printing press at the start of our republic or social media in this century. Only the solution remains the same: to hand over control of what we read or hear to a governing elite like Kerry. In 1860, Frederick Douglass gave a “Plea for Free Speech in Boston,” and warned them that all of their struggles meant nothing if the “freedom of speech is struck down” because “Liberty is meaningless where the right to utter one’s thoughts and opinions has ceased to exist.” Douglass denounced those seeking to deny or limit free speech as making their “freedom a mockery.”"
John Kerry is against free speech, Letters - " Former Secretary of State John Kerry recently made headlines for his remarks portraying the First Amendment as a threat (“Elites stoking war on speech,” Jonathan Turley, Oct. 3). It’s also fitting that the comments were made at the World Economic Forum, which is run by Klaus Schwab. He once declared the role model for governing to be China — a communist dictatorship — during the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which originated there. Free speech is not a threat to the public good. Would-be tyrants like Kerry — who want to control everything we do and never face criticism— are. These are the very people the founders gave us the First Amendment to protect us from."
World Economic Forum on X - "'If you think the economy is more important than the environment – try hold your breath while you count your money.' - @BadrJafar with a powerful message at #DavosAgenda Watch here: https://t.co/5gknAALkjt @_HadleyGamble @CNBC"
If you think the environment is more important than the economy, try starving to death while hugging a tree
Instagram - "This 2016 video of "bioethicist" S. Matthew Liao is circulating again, in which he calls for bioengineering of humans to make us allergic to meat (to save the planet!). But who is this dweeb, and why has he not been crammed into a locker yet? Liao has held positions at Oxford, Johns Hopkins, Georgetown and Princeton, and is now a professor at NYU. In the video, he was speaking at the 2016 World Science Festival, otherwise known as the "Davos of Science". After suggesting that humans could be made allergic to meat to stop them eating it, he also suggests shrinking people to reduce their carbon footprint. Seriously. He says a reduction of 15cm would reduce an individual's carbon footprint by 25%. Liao has been making these crazy suggestions since at least 2012, when a paper he published on "biohacking" to solve the climate crisis was picked up by the Atlantic magazine. Liao suggested IVF screening to ensure reduced height; skin patches to stimulate meat allergies; and bioengineering the human body to combat climate change. Giving women "smart drugs" to raise their IQ, which would in turn make them have fewer children (obviously). And, in a suggestion straight out of Equilibrium, he proposed giving everyone the pro-social drug oxytocin to ensure they cooperate with tackling climate change. So far so strange. Truth is, the notion of "biohacking" (altering our genome to produce desirable traits) is central to the WEF vision of the Great Reset (see Schwab's book on the 4th Industrial Revolution, for instance). And guess what? Liao is closely associated with the WEF. NYU, where Liao works, is a nexus for WEF interests. Blackrock CEO Larry Fink is on NYU's board of trustees (and the board of the WEF). Liao regularly hosts WEF members at NYU, like Francesca Rossi. Information about Liao's work with the WEF has, funnily enough, been scrubbed. #regenerativeagriculture #matthewlaio"Instagram - "This 2016 video of "bioethicist" S. Matthew Liao is circulating again, in which he calls for bioengineering of humans to make us allergic to meat (to save the planet!). But who is this dweeb, and why has he not been crammed into a locker yet? Liao has held positions at Oxford, Johns Hopkins, Georgetown and Princeton, and is now a professor at NYU. In the video, he was speaking at the 2016 World Science Festival, otherwise known as the "Davos of Science". After suggesting that humans could be made allergic to meat to stop them eating it, he also suggests shrinking people to reduce their carbon footprint. Seriously. He says a reduction of 15cm would reduce an individual's carbon footprint by 25%. Liao has been making these crazy suggestions since at least 2012, when a paper he published on "biohacking" to solve the climate crisis was picked up by the Atlantic magazine. Liao suggested IVF screening to ensure reduced height; skin patches to stimulate meat allergies; and bioengineering the human body to combat climate change. Giving women "smart drugs" to raise their IQ, which would in turn make them have fewer children (obviously). And, in a suggestion straight out of Equilibrium, he proposed giving everyone the pro-social drug oxytocin to ensure they cooperate with tackling climate change. So far so strange. Truth is, the notion of "biohacking" (altering our genome to produce desirable traits) is central to the WEF vision of the Great Reset (see Schwab's book on the 4th Industrial Revolution, for instance). And guess what? Liao is closely associated with the WEF. NYU, where Liao works, is a nexus for WEF interests. Blackrock CEO Larry Fink is on NYU's board of trustees (and the board of the WEF). Liao regularly hosts WEF members at NYU, like Francesca Rossi. Information about Liao's work with the WEF has, funnily enough, been scrubbed. #regenerativeagriculture #matthewlaio"
Meme - Drake Hotline Bling: "PROJECT 2025" *No*
"THE GREAT RESET" *Yes*
Desiree Fixler on X - "I helped build the WEF’s “Great Reset.” Here’s what it really is — from the inside. The WEF sold the “Great Reset” as “build back better” — climate action, ESG, inclusion, and PPP. In practice, it shifted power away from voters to NGOs, corporate elites, and unelected technocrats. Policy was relabeled “science” to silence debate. Markets were warped by ESG scores, carbon taxes, and paper-pushing regulation. Corporations were turned into enforcers of ideology. As Nicole Shanahan reveals, communities weren’t uplifted — wealth and power were pushed upward. We got higher energy bills, debased money, an affordability crisis, fewer jobs, and creeping control over how we live and speak. I questioned it. Then I walked away. And I’ve been speaking out ever since. @NicoleShanahan"
Trust the Experts! If you oppose the left wing agenda you're a bigot and a Denier
Jim Ferguson on X - "🚨 RFK Jr Just TORCHED the World Economic Forum — and he’s absolutely right. Asked by Glenn Beck where he stands on the WEF, RFK didn’t hold back: “It’s a billionaires’ boys club shifting wealth upward and imposing totalitarian controls.” “They fly to Davos on private jets and tell world leaders how to govern the rest of us.” “During COVID, $4 TRILLION was shifted upward while they closed the little guys.” This is the part the media will bury:
RFK Jr is openly stating that Big Tech, Big Government, and the WEF colluded — to censor dissent, crush small businesses, and eliminate constitutional rights while enriching the global elite. And he’s not wrong. The WEF model is simple:
• Obey global governance
• Erase national sovereignty
• Criminalise dissent
• Centralise power
• Enrich the elite class
• Digitise the population
Meanwhile ordinary people were locked down, bankrupted, silenced, and surveilled. RFK Jr is saying the quiet part out loud: The WEF isn’t a “think tank.” It’s an unelected cartel of billionaires trying to run the world. And people are finally waking up. @glennbeck"
Wide Awake Media on X - "Former US government insider and author of 'The Great Reset', Marc Morano, on Klaus Schwab's recent B20 speech: "He's talking about us essentially giving up national sovereignty, giving up individual freedoms, and turning over rule to experts... This whole agenda is to make it so we have no choice on some of the biggest questions of our lives." "We didn't get to vote on whether gas powered cars would be banned, we didn't vote for vaccine mandates, we didn't vote for lockdowns, we didn't vote for banning of meat. But all of this is happening, because at these meetings like the World Economic Forum and the United Nations, they meet and they work with government-corporate collusion to bypass democracy and impose stuff through this corporate government fascism." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=CAFgmKW0Veg For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #KlausSchwab #WorldEconomicForum #GreatReset #UnitedNations #Agenda2030 #Agenda21"
