Brigitte Gabriel on X - "🚨 BREAKING: 6 DEAD IN GERMANY MASS SHOOTING: A 45-year-old man of Turkish descent opened fire at a facility for pregnant women and young mothers near Hamburg. All 6 victims were employees. Several others hospitalized. Suspect is in custody. Motive: domestic violence. Germany has some of the world's strictest gun laws. Six people are still dead."
Woman Who Helped Stade Shooter Flee Worked for State-Funded Pro-Migration NGO - "The 65-year-old woman who drove the Stade mass shooter away from the scene works as a family and migration adviser for a pro-migration organization that receives significant funding from the German government, according to exclusive information obtained by German outlet NIUS. The woman, identified as Sylvia S from Bremen, reportedly drove the 45-year-old German citizen of Turkish origin to Monday’s custody-related meeting at a mother-and-child welfare facility in Stade, Lower Saxony. The man opened fire during the meeting, killing six employees—four women and two men—before fleeing in a grey Mercedes driven by Sylvia S. Police stopped the vehicle after a pursuit and detained both of them. The suspect, reportedly linked to the notorious Miri clan, remains in custody."
Afghan Commits Mass Groping And Attempted Rape Against Underage Girls At Swimming Pool - "A 21-year-old Afghan migrant has been arrested for a mass groping attack and attempted rape against underage girls at a German swimming pool in Schwäbisch Gmünd. At least four girls aged 12 to 14 were victims of sexual assaults last Saturday afternoon at the swimming pool, where the 21-year-old suspect reportedly groped their buttocks and thighs as well as trying to pull off their bikinis. In one case, he attempted to penetrate one girl’s vagina with his finger, which police are investigating as a potential rape under the legal definition. The girls successfully fought the man off before he was arrested by police officers. The public prosecutor’s office requested an arrest warrant, but the presiding judge suspended it. Now, the Afghan is free on the streets, with only the condition he not visit any public pools. German news outlet Tagesschau has reported on the incident has not disclosed that the suspect is an Afghan migrant. This omission fits a pattern at the taxpayer-funded outlet that has been sharply criticized by the right. Other outlets, however, reported his nationality. The story is very similar to a piece that ran just yesterday by Remix News, in which an Indian migrant sexually assaulted four underage Italian girls at a waterpark in Italy. The Indian migrant committed suicide inside his police cell just 48 hours later. Last year, nine girls were sexually assaulted at a swimming pool in Germany by Syrian men, fueling national anger over migrant crime. In 2023, in the German city of Stuttgart, police arrested a 23-year-old Syrian migrant who is accused of groping several women at an outdoor swimming pool over Pentecost weekend. In total, seven women, ranging from ages 12 to 18, were sexually assaulted at the swimming pool in three different incidents. Three men in total were taken into custody, including a 23-year-old Syrian migrant. In Cologne in September 2023, eight foreign nationals were arrested for surrounding and sexually assaulting a 13-year-old girl in a swimming pool. The girl managed to break free and alert police, who detained the suspects shortly after. In 2022, three 12-year-old girls were sexually assaulted in the Kaufbeuren public swimming pool in Bavaria by a group of six older teenagers described as having dark skin and speaking broken German. Police are still looking for the suspects. The internal report stated, “(We) can confirm a surge in sex crimes at these establishments. In particular rape and the sexual abuse of children in bathing establishments have given us grave cause for concern. The perpetrators are, for the most part, immigrants.” In 2022, violence in German outdoor swimming pools alarmed the Federal Association of German Swimming Champions (BDS) to such an extent that its president, Peter Harzheim, said he could no longer recommend that families visit such facilities on weekends. While speaking to Bild TV, Harzheim claimed he would be “acting irresponsibly” if he attended an outdoor pool with his own three grandchildren."
Visegrád 24 on X - "The German government under Chancellor Friedrich Merz is funding a nationwide campaign promoting the slogan "Muslims: A part of you!" as part of its "Action Weeks Against Anti-Muslim Racism." The whole program is funded at the expense of German taxpayers. The Federal Ministry for Family Affairs has awarded €624,997 in 2026 to CLAIM, the organization coordinating the campaign, which includes billboards, exhibitions, conferences, school programs and public events across Germany. The funding has drawn criticism because CLAIM inherited the structures and staff of a previous alliance of around 50 Muslim organizations that was dissolved in 2025. Germany's domestic intelligence services tied that network to groups linked to political Islam, including Muslim Brotherhood circles and Hamas-supporter networks."
X Freeze on X - "Germany is spending taxpayer money on a nationwide campaign saying: “Muslims: A part of you!” But where is the same campaign for Christians? Germany was built on deep Christian roots, yet Christians are constantly expected to stay silent while the government publicly promotes selective “equality” No Arab or Muslim-majority country is running taxpayer-funded campaigns saying: “Christians: A part of you!” So why is Germany doing this only one way? How is it okay to trash equality in the name of promoting one religion?"
Over 280,000 Iraqi refugees in Germany: migration office
Clearly, this is karma for Germany for supporting the illegal Iraq War! If they didn't want refugees, they should not have supported illegal wars!Anthony LaMesa on X - "Denmark has really maintained Japan-adjacent peace, order, and security despite having significantly more liberal immigration and criminal justice policies (freedom of movement for 450 million Europeans, Schengen open borders, and humane prisons). Danish Social Democrats have achieved liberalism that works for citizens and their approach stands in stark contrast with DSA’s “no bedtime” thinking about borders and crime."
Jacob Shell on X - "Denmark was Bernie's model society in all his mid-10s speeches and interviews. The Danes have vigorous assimilation rules, including controlling where immigrants can live (to prevent formation of non-Danish linguistic ghettos and "parallel societies"). The Danish left also got on board with this kind of thing. This obviously cuts hard against the grain of what the wider Western left has been advocating over the past decade-plus. Not sure what explains Danish exceptionality, but I suspect it has to do with a certain deep-rooted defensive prickliness, which the local left shares in as well, due to that land border with Germany."
Mj מירי on X - "Worth noting that Denmark’s model actually includes geography-based sentencing that targets immigrant heavy areas. They basically have a two-tiered justice system wherein offences committed inside designated neighbourhoods called “skærpet strafzone” — enhanced punishment zones— receive harsher sentences than the same offences committed elsewhere. So immigrants are receiving tougher sentences than Danes. Some immigrant and refugee groups, specifically from MENA and African nations, also receive lower welfare benefits than ordinary Danish welfare recipients, so immigrants can claim welfare, but they wont receive as much as a Dane. I don’t think this would, or should, fly in the States. It certainly doesn’t fly in Canada."
Ayaan Hirsi Ali - Migrants and the Threat to Women’s Rights in Europe - "European statistics on sex crimes are a maze, if not a minefield, of inconsistent and changing definitions. Denmark is unusual for making it relatively easy to distinguish immigrant offenders. Since 2015, the country’s share of immigrants from “non-Western countries,” excluding their Danish-born descendants, has risen from around 5% to 6%. Yet from 2015 to 2019 they have accounted for around 11% of convictions for sex offenses and 34% of convictions for rape. In Germany a new category of “rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault in especially serious cases including resulting in death” was introduced in June 2016, making it hard to measure the effect of the migrant influx. Even so, in 2017 and 2018, more than a third of the suspects in the new category were non-Germans. For all sexual-abuse cases, the share of non-German suspects rose from 15% in 2014 to 23% in 2016, 2017 and 2018, and 21% in 2019. “Non-German” is a broad category. In Germany’s crime statistics, the term zuwanderer, or “newcomers,” was used until 2016 to identify suspects who were asylum applicants, failed asylum seekers and illegal residents. This definition was expanded in 2017 to include successful asylum seekers. From 2017 to 2019, zuwanderer accounted for between 10% and 12% of sex-crime suspects, and around 16% of suspects for rape, sexual coercion and sexual assault in especially serious cases. It is unlikely that zuwanderer accounted for much more than 2% of the German population. In Austria, “crimes or offenses against sexual integrity and self-determination” increased by 53% between 2015 and 2018. Between a quarter and a third of suspects were foreign, but in 2018 only 19.4% of the population was foreign-born. Between 4% and 11% of the suspects were asylum seekers; the share of the population born in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria—among the largest sources of asylum seekers—was only 1.2%. In the absence of official statistics, the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet reviewed the gang-rape cases heard in Swedish courts between July 2012 and December 2017. Of the 112 men convicted, it found that three-quarters were foreign-born (almost all of those from outside Europe), and 30% were asylum seekers. I don’t claim this problem is unique to Muslim migrants. Rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment seem to be universal. Nevertheless, the behavior of Muslim men in Europe is important for three reasons. First, the scale of the migration and its likely continuation. Second, its political salience. Sexual misconduct by some migrants provides the far right with a tool to demonize them all. Third, the lack of frank discussion also helps Islamists, who recognize the problem but propose a remedy that would set back all women. Talking about violence by Muslim men against European women is at odds with identity politics and its matrix of victimhood. Politicians, journalists and academics have been reluctant to acknowledge that the migrant sex-crime wave even exists. This is as much an issue of class as religion or race. Much of the crime and misconduct against women takes place in low-income neighborhoods. Somehow in the era of #MeToo, their predicament arouses less sympathy than that of Hollywood actresses. I have been encouraged by French President Emmanuel Macron’s condemnation of Islamist ideology in his country. But he and other leaders are still much too reluctant to talk about the sex-crime wave, which signifies an erosion of women’s rights. Rapes in France surged by 31% and other sexual “aggressions” by 32% from 2016 to 2018. Pretending the problem doesn’t exist is the surest way to empower not only the far right but also the Islamists, whose solution entails even greater restrictions on female freedom."
From 2021. Time to pretend that per capita doesn't matter, that rise in rates is due to expanding methodology (which is a good thing) even if victim surveys disagree, and that the higher arrest and conviction rates are proof of racism, xenophobia and Islamophobia
Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry on X - "I am translating this horrifying, heartbreaking testimony from Lili R. Many people who don't live in France might not understand how bad things have become. "I am 26 years old, blonde, with light eyes, and I have always lived in the 6th arrondissement of Lyon, which is thought of as the poshest area in Lyon, and my daily life has become unbearable. I write this because, ten years ago, I could go out with my friends in the evening, at any hour, without being bothered, insulted, followed, or stabbed. I mention stabbing because, three years ago, my boyfriend, along with two of his friends, on their way home, were approached by a group of men. They surrounded them, stole one of their cell phones. They tried to fight back, and my boyfriend, in spite of being a strong rugbyman, got stabbed, in the arm--while protecting his neck, which was the target. Someone tried to cut his throat. As for myself, on a regular basis, men follow me, insult me because I refuse to talk back or because I say I have a boyfriend. One day, one spit on me. More and more, I am whistled at like a dog, or "ksksks"'d like I am a cat. Acts of this nature have happened to me perhaps thirty times in the past year. Six months ago, we adopted a puppy. One evening, my boyfriend went out to walk him at 9pm, and three men tried to steal the puppy. Since then, we only go out in the evening as a couple, and I always carry pepper spray in my purse. In our neighborhood, just in our block, there are three drug dealing spots, which work constantly. Day and night. With everything that entails: watchmen loitering outside our house, milling about, shouting, getting high and bothering people, especially women. Every single one of the actions I mentioned (and they are only a part of what we have gone through) is the fact of men of sub-Saharan African or North African origin. A white man has never behaved towards me the way they have. Is it racist to call out what my daily life has become as a woman, because of immigration? Is my reality, my daily life, racist? Am I not as legitimate as any other person to call out traumatising acts of violence, just because they are done by foreigners or immigrants? To be clear, I am not talking about men in general, but specifically men, sometimes underage, who are of immigrant background. Now, and for about four years, the way I live my life has had to change to live with this constant insecurity. Now I live with a pepper spray outside my front door, a taser, and a false pistol, after an attempted break-in. We have had an extra lock added to our door. We have a security camera in our apartment. In my purse, I carry a second pepper spray, as well as brass knuckles on my keychain. I never walk into a building without checking both sides of the street, in case a man is following me. I never make eye contact with you-know-who. I constantly cross the street. I no longer leave my home on my own after 9pm. I no longer use public transport for obvious reasons. I am afraid when I am alone at home. I am afraid when outside. Now, I am always afraid. I do not want this future for my children who, fortunately, are not yet here. I do not understand people who do not see that France is turning into a cradle of insecurity because of immigrant men. Insecurity to women, but to men as well. Therefore, for your future, and those of your children or your children-to-be: cast the right vote."
From 2024
Migrant Squats: How the Far-Left Keeps Undocumented Migrants on French Soil : r/europe_sub - " Notes from the territorial intelligence services, consulted by JDNews, reveal the collusion between certain associations and the far-left protest movement in illegally opening squats for migrants. The alert was raised at the highest levels of the State, in the middle of summer, by the intelligence services. Migrant squats are skyrocketing. In February 2024, 157 squats were recorded by the Interior Ministry, 169 last December, and 244 by June. That’s a 55% increase in less than a year and a half. Southern France, particularly Toulouse and Perpignan, is especially affected, accounting for two-thirds of these illegal occupations. Most squatters are from sub-Saharan Africa and the Maghreb. The largest squats are mostly made up of single men, adults or claiming to be unaccompanied minors, while smaller ones are mainly occupied by families with children. These newcomers, who entered the country illegally, do not find housing—even precarious—on their own. A system relying on a myriad of intermediary associations allows them to remain on French soil. JDNews obtained access to several recent notes from the National Directorate of Territorial Intelligence (DNRT), shedding light on this network of connections between migrant aid associations—often subsidized with public funds—and the far-left protest movement.
Public Buildings Targeted First
Nationwide, 69 associations and collectives, 18 of which are considered “disruptive,” have been identified for their ties to the No Border or anarchist-autonomist movements, requiring “increased vigilance.” Among these groups working on behalf of migrants, 550 individuals have been identified as activists or members; 230 were already known for “their proximity or belonging to various far-left movements, as well as for their subversive and violent potential regarding security and public order,” according to analysts. These individuals do not hesitate to pool their resources locally to open new squats.
Activists Present Themselves as Educators for Disabled Children
In Toulouse, where the far-left has a strong historical foothold, No Border activists target properties owned by the local public land establishment of the metropolitan area. These properties are known to have longer eviction timelines than private homes. Activists occupy the premises and then present themselves to authorities as belonging to an association for educators of disabled children, thereby delaying the State’s action to remove them. When legal decisions become imminent, associations of lawyers specializing in the defense of migrants step in, further extending eviction deadlines through multiple appeals. In Lyon, Grenoble, and Tours, school buildings are the main targets. All this creates a deterioration in living conditions for residents: begging, altercations among squatters, incivilities, noise pollution due to drug or alcohol consumption—and sometimes even physical violence, theft, or burglary.
When the State is Put on the Spot
Some squat openings are even publicly claimed, under the guise of humanitarian action, by activists convinced of the legitimacy of their cause. Their strategy is to expose the State’s “failures” and flood the media so that public opinion focuses not on the illegal nature of their actions but on the allegedly “repressive” response of law enforcement. The association Utopia 56, which has official civic service accreditation, regularly inundates the General Inspectorate of the National Police (IGPN) and the Defender of Rights with complaints. Human Right Observers, for its part, organizes copwatching operations—police surveillance—along the coast to disrupt efforts to stop illegal boat departures for the UK. Historic associations such as Réseau Éducation Sans Frontières (RESF), La Cimade, and the Ligue des droits de l’homme “regularly march together with far-left collectives” during protests or days of action. One such example was on March 22 during a demonstration called by La France Insoumise “against racism,” which mixed support for Gaza with controversy over an antisemitic poster depicting Cyril Hanouna. Two-thirds of the disruptive collectives identified by intelligence are, in reality, “de facto groups,” making it impossible—just like with Les Soulèvements de la Terre in the environmental field—to bring administrative or criminal charges, since they take care not to expose themselves directly to violent acts, leaving such actions to individual activists.
Authorities Respond—but Activists Adapt
Prefects dealing with this issue have sometimes succeeded in stopping these occupations. Thanks to the July 2023 anti-squat law, which strengthens housing protections and shortens eviction deadlines, the use of administrative rather than judicial procedures has risen sharply. In the first half of 2025, 36 squats were shut down, including 22 in Perpignan alone. In Fontaine-lès-Dijon, an illegal camp was cleared in early April. In Lyon, the emblematic squat on Quai Arloing was cleared last June. But intelligence services report that activist groups are already finding ways around the law. They now open new shelters via the Airbnb platform: renting apartments for a few days, changing the locks, and moving in new migrants. Since the property owner authorized entry, accelerated eviction procedures cannot be triggered."
Bonaccini (President of the Italian Democratic Party and MEP) shocked La7 (tv network): "Without migrants, who will clean the hotels and pick the vegetables?" The web: classist and racist (video) : r/europe_sub - "Immigrants as new slaves. The incredible speech by Stefano Bonaccini, a Democratic Party MEP, on Omnibus on La 7 is a eulogy to slavery. What if there were fewer migrants? "I'd send Vannacci to work as a caregiver for Italian families, to clean hotel rooms, to clean restaurant kitchens, and to pick all the vegetables in the fields..." This video excerpt is making the rounds online, shared and re-shared, and sarcastically commented on. "They want underpaid workers above all," writes one user on X about migrants. Bonaccini, a radical chic on La7: migrants as new slaves The topic of immigration and jobs was discussed. The words of the former governor of Emilia Romagna are disconcerting, embarrassing. It's not a high-profile vision, no doubt about it. "The left's last mask is finally falling: indiscriminate acceptance so they can be exploited and underpaid in menial jobs, only to then demand their votes," criticizes another. Bonaccini makes a fool of himself with this brief argument, however brief. Some unmask a certain do-goodism in a flurry of unforgiving comments: "Having no real reason, other than ideological, to support the multicultural massacre they've promoted for years, they're always forced to use the issue of jobs, which Italians blah blah. Disturbing inadequacy." In reality, writes another, "they fear losing their vote (of immigrants, ed.), since they can no longer count on that of Italians." The web: "The last mask falls on migrants: underpaying them for menial jobs." Stefano Bonaccini raised the issue of foreigners' contribution to the Italian economy, which he drastically limits to strenuous work like fruit and vegetable picking, elderly care, cleaning, and catering. Bonaccini misses the complexity. Dig deeper, and the classist soul of a certain left emerges, captured in these few, significant words. "They're so radical they don't even realize what they're saying." This reasoning is based on a unique classism and racism. Fabio Dragoni, a columnist for La Verità, who shared the post, sparking a back-and-forth, commented: "One of the most classist and racist speeches I've ever heard... He wants slaves. The same dynamic that arose during the American Civil War." Another user expressed indignation: "They're unspeakable. The fight is against illegal immigration, not against those who live in Italy and work legally. Furthermore, he calmly maintains that there are workers who are underpaid and in the hands of gangmasters. Truly unspeakable." Here is the classist “vision” interpreted by Stefano Bonaccini."
PeterSweden on X - "IT HAS HAPPENED Sweden has made the UN update their guidelines so that r*pe is now considered a serious crime that warrants deportation. This comes after the shocking case in Sweden where a man from Eritrea was convicted of r*ping a 16 year old girl. But the court said he couldn't be deported it wasn't considered a serious enough offence for deportation. Of course this story was covered up by the media. But it was reported on X and caused massive outrage in Sweden."
The far-Left sees electoral gain in building a ‘new France’ defined by immigration - "as Mélenchon put it, he wanted “to connect the old France” with what he called “La Nouvelle France” (The New France)... it means the mainly immigrant population of the banlieues, the wretchedly poor suburbs which now encircle most major metropolitan centres in France. In 2026, the term “New France” is being mobilised as the key part of Mélenchon’s electoral strategy, bringing politics to a traditionally disillusioned and disenfranchised section of the population. This is why Mélenchon has chosen figures such as Bagayoko, whose family come from Mali (and has a Palestinian flag hanging in his office), Aly Diouara, a National Assembly deputy for LFI of Gambian descent, and Rima Hassan, an immigrant of Palestinian and Kurdish origin who was born in a Syrian refugee camp as “the new faces of the LFI”. Saint-Denis has in effect become a testing ground for the “New France” and so far it seems to be working. Alongside the term “New France”, Mélenchon speaks of the “creolisation” of France, to describe the hybrid demographic of the banlieues. This is a term which he has borrowed from the poet and philosopher Édouard Glissant, a native of the Caribbean island of Martinique, a French overseas territory. It rejects the traditional notion of “integration” in favour of a blending of “behaviours, norms and languages” shaped by the immigrant experience. Mélenchon thinks that this is a genuinely new French Revolution for the 21st century, one which he defines as “a concrete Universalism”. Unsurprisingly, however, there are plenty of people who belong to the “old France” who violently object to Mélenchon’s “extremism”. These come not just from the Right but also sections of the French Left who might otherwise have been sympathetic to the LFI. Fabien Roussel, a presidential candidate for the Communist Party in 2022, has, for example, denounced the LFI strategy. He claims it is a form of “communautarisme” – a taboo form of identity politics in communist circles – which might well “fracture France” even further. Mélenchon responded to Roussel that this was a form of “racialised politics” which risked dangerously alienating the “New France” of the banlieues even further... Seen from Britain, it seems that Mélenchon’s electoral strategy of the “New France”, replacing one “native” political constituency with another, is only doing explicitly what many on the UK Left would like to do by stealth. It remains to be seen, however, whether this ushers in a new age of social transformation for France, or only deepens the existing political chaos."
