L'origine de Bert

Get email updates of new posts:        (Delivered by FeedBurner)

Friday, October 09, 2026

Links - 9th October 2026 (2 - Palestine/Middle East Peace)

TrendingPolitics.ca on X - "''I did not blame Jews for the actions of the Israeli government'' NDP leader @avilewis rejects claims he blamed the Jewish community for Israel's actions, after a Yom Kippur post saying Jews "failed to do our part" in stopping the Gaza war."
annanimiddy on X - "Again, there's no way to reconcile his narcissistic "not in my name" with "I'm not responsible," and now he's getting hoisted on his own petard. He needed to virtue signal his complicity to be accepted by the equity card holders who wouldn't have accepted a rich, white Jewish leader who failed to render his garments to their satisfaction.  There is no violin small enough. Sometimes, a leader and the movement so richly deserve each other."
Maspeek on X - "Jewish people collectively have not done enough to stop a genocide AND I am not holding them collectively responsible at all, that would be antisemitic.🤔 Contradicts himself within 30 seconds."
annanimiddy on X - "There's no way out for him. All these guys have to prove how they're actually the good Jews is bashing Israel, so they can't let other Jews off the hook for being morally inferior to them."
Good luck if you say Muslims need to condemn Islamist terrorism

Avi Lewis on X - "The shooting outside a synagogue in Belleville is deeply upsetting, and has traumatized a community that gathered to pray.  It is yet another reminder of the work that remains to create a Canada that is truly safe for people of all faiths, including Jewish people – to worship, to come together, to live without fear.  Today, I am sending love and solidarity to the Jewish community in Belleville and across the country on this Yom Kippur, the most solemn and holiest day of the year."
Jesse Brown on X - "You cannot declare that Canadian Jews have "collectively caused harm" by "failing to stop a genocide" and then act surprised and upset when maniacs hold Jews to blame for exactly that. You share responsibility for this crime, @avilewis"

'Palestinian Rachel Dolezal' outed as white woman of 'significant privilege and wealth' - "A woke anti-Israel teacher and activist who claimed to be part black and Arab has been dubbed the “Palestinian Rachel Dolezal” after she was outed as being a white, Jewish woman who hid her privileged identity as she led antisemitic protests.   Hannah Gann, a Philadelphia teacher, was forced to confess she was a “white woman of significant privilege and wealth” after fellow lefty activists grew suspicious of her background and confronted her... Gann has been a ringleader for anti-Israel protests based in the Philadelphia public schools, according to a local watchdog group, who branded “Philadelphia’s Leading Antisemite” on a mobile billboard parked outside the school where she worked...   “I watched her sudden transformation after she returned to Philly from the Peace Corps [in Rwanda]. She was clearly making herself look darker using makeup and fake tan, and speaking using [African American Vernacular English],” the classmate said.  In one video from December 2025, the activist teacher wears a keffiyeh and has a “blaccent,” which she did not use in per apology post...   The LARPing activist frequently referenced family in Palestine, including a grandfather who was revealed to have been born in Baltimore, the Inquirer reported, citing a document compiled by the Philly Palestine Coalition (PPC).  The PPC said that as “a teacher of predominately black youth, [Gann] has gained the trust of young people on the basis of a sense of shared oppression. She has served as a mentor to at least one young white person, who was manipulated by Hannah on the basis of a fake identity. “Her access to vulnerable young people, especially black youth, is deeply concerning, given her pattern of lying and manipulation,” the PPC added.  She also successfully solicited money by claiming she was broke because of sending cash to her relatives in Palestine, according to the PPC. In reality, much of her family still lives in Israel, according to the Inquirer.  She also grew up in remarkable privelege. Her father is a noted tax lawyer who previously worked for the Treasury Department and her $1.8 million family home is in Falls Church, Virginia — the second wealthiest suburb in the nation.  Gann also appeared to bolster claims about her race with subtle disguises – critics accused her of wearing bronzer and other makeup to appear darker, along with donning golden hoop earrings and clawed acrylic fingernails.   Gann also spoke with what stunned critics called a “blaccent” which was audible across her numerous preachy Instagram videos where she lectured about racism and imperialism, all from her supposedly personal experience.  But those affectations were gone in her apology video – no accents and no black lingo to be heard. Her hoop earrings, however remained.  And a listen back at her old videos after the truth was exposed seemed to make her fraud obvious, as she appeared to weave in and out of her affected accent — sometimes sentence by sentence.   The race-faker was outed after a showdown with members of two local activist groups — the Racial Justice Organizing Committee and Philly Educators for Palestine... Gann, who was listed in materials for a 2024 West Philly “teach-in” on “scholasticide” in Gaza as a Palestinian-American, also stunningly admitted that she even hid her pro-Palestinian activism from her family in order to keep living the lie.   “I hid the truth or outright lied about my background to everyone in my life,” she said, adding that the deception included her own family.  Gann arrogantly confessed she “allowed half-truths and obfuscations to grow into outright lies” because she “genuinely wanted to commit to the work I was doing.”... while Gann’s position was not nearly as prominent as Dolezal’s, it was shocking nevertheless in her West Philadelphia community – where she was such a prominent anti-Israel voice that her activism was documented by multiple antisemitism watchdog groups.  A box truck drove around her neighborhood in 2024 calling her: “Hannah Gann: 10th grade teacher and Philadelphia’s leading antisemite” – and it was paired with a photo of her screaming at a 2023 anti-Israel rally.  That rally was dubbed “pro-Hamas” by another antisemitism awareness group, Canary Mission, which posted footage of Gann helping lead the rally just weeks after Hamas terrorists killed more than 1,200 people in their Oct. 7 attack on Israel.   “I know every martyr’s life is precious,” Gann said the rally, evoking the term Hamas uses to describe its dead killers.  “When a Palestinian child picks of a rock or a slingshot in the face of Israeli tanks or machine guns, we owe them that same energy,” she screamed to a cheering crowd. “We owe them to take it to these streets and f–k the police until Palestine is free.”  That rally was held outside a Jewish bakery.  Other alarming acts included Gann saying a Jewish teacher — who complained about classroom banners calling for Israel’s destruction — was “lying and playing the victim,” along with her joking about firebombing Jewish-owned business.  Gann, who teaches at the Workshop School, a project-based Philadelphia School District high school, also defended Keziah Ridgeway, a fellow Philadelphia teacher the school district disciplined for private, pro-Palestinian social media posts."
Left wingers love to larp as the oppressed, because they know victim culture rewards "victimhood" and "oppression"

 Rafael Medoff | Facebook - "THE TERRORIST WAS THE VICTIM —AND THE VICTIM DIDN’T EXIST
Neria Leiter, the son of Israel’s ambassador to Washington, was severely wounded this week by a Palestinian Arab terrorist who rammed his car into the vehicle in which Leiter was a passenger. Soldiers on the scene killed the terrorist.  But here’s how the Palestinian Authority’s official news agency, Wafa, reported the news:   “Israeli occupation forces on Wednesday shot dead a Palestinian near Beit Ur al-Tahta village, west of Ramallah, according to the Health Ministry. The Ministry announced that the gun-toting Israeli soldiers opened fire at vehicle near the village, killing 29-year-old Mahmoud Mohammad Suleiman.”  While decent people around the world are praying for the recovery of the latest Jewish victim of Palestinian Arab terrorism, Palestinian Arabs are being told by their government that the terrorist actually was an innocent victim of “gun-toting” Israelis—and Neria Leiter doesn’t even exist.  In Washington yesterday, Ambassador Leiter—whose son Moshe was killed by terrorists in Gaza in 2023—spoke of Palestinian Arab terror as “the unimaginable reality we have been living with in Israel.”  Part of what makes it so unimaginable is that a regime which signed a peace agreement with Israel thirty-three years ago justifies the terrorism, erases the Jewish victims, and rewards the terrorists.  In accordance with its Pay-for-Slay policy, the PA will reward Mahmoud Suleiman’s family with an initial payment of 6,000 shekels (about $2,000), followed by a monthly payment of 1,400 shekels ($461) for the rest of their lives. That’s nearly half the average monthly salary of residents of the PA-governed areas.  Is it any wonder that so many Israelis doubt the Palestinian Authority is sincerely interested in peace?"

Palestinian journalist Rula Jebreal calls Hakeem Jeffries an ‘AIPAC monkey’ — claims she didn’t mean it in a ‘racist way’ - "Palestinian journalist Rula Jebreal took heat from black lawmakers Friday after she referred to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) as an “AIPAC monkey.”... Ali interjected to note that using the term “monkey” has “terrible racial connotations … but I think you caught yourself and said you didn’t mean it with any racial animosity.”   Jabreal attempted to clarify: “There are these three monkeys – one, I cannot hear, I cannot see, I cannot speak – it reminds me of these three monkeys.”   The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) rejected Jebreal’s defense.   “To be clear, there isn’t a non-racist way to call Leader Jeffries—a Black man—a ‘monkey’ or ‘errand boy’”...   Rep, Ritchie Torres (D-NY) similarly argued in an X post that “calling a Black man a ‘monkey’ is racist. Full stop.”  “If Wajahat Ali and Rula Jebreal were on the far right, no one on the far left would have any trouble condemning them for dehumanizing a Black man in racist terms,” the black congressman added. “The silence is deafening.”  Jebreal later issued a backhanded apology on X.   “I am disgusted and horrified that Hakeem Jeffries is taking money from AIPAC amidst Israel’s genocide in Palestine,” she wrote. “That said, a term that I used to describe him was inappropriate and offensive and should never have been used.  “I apologize unconditionally.”"

David Bernstein on X - "You have to wonder about the mental stability and acuity of people who spent much of their adolescence and young adulthood insisting that climate change was going to wipe out life as we know, and that this was the single, most important issue of our lifetimes and... despite this not being resolved, switched their life focus to being apologists for hamas."
The left wing agenda is all connected

Pensioner receives police payout over ‘thought crime’ tweet - "A retired special constable has been given compensation of £20,000 after being wrongly arrested over a social media post warning about rising anti-Semitism.  Julian Foulkes, from Gillingham, Kent, was handcuffed at his home by six officers after replying to a pro-Palestinian activist on X.  Kent Police officers searched his home and commented on his “very Brexity” book collection. The force detained the 71-year-old for eight hours, interrogated and issued him with a caution after officers visited his home on Nov 2 2023.  Earlier this month, Kent Police confirmed that the caution was a mistake and had been deleted from Mr Foulkes’s record. Tim Smith, the force’s chief constable, later phoned Mr Foulkes personally to offer an apology for the “ordeal he endured”.  Now, in a letter sent to Mr Foulkes’ solicitors, the force reiterated Mr Smith’s apology for the “distress caused by the actions of his officers” .  It also confirmed Kent Police would agree to an out-of-court settlement after Mr Foulkes launched a legal challenge, supported by the Free Speech Union (FSU), against the force for wrongful arrest and detention... Police body-worn camera footage captured officers scrutinising Mr Foulkes’s collection of books by authors such as Douglas Murray, a Telegraph contributor, and issues of The Spectator, pointing to what they described as “very Brexity things”.  Mr Foulkes’s X post replied to an activist threatening to sue Suella Braverman, the home secretary at the time, for calling pro-Palestinian demonstrations in London “hate marches”.  In the post, sent two days before police visited his home, Mr Foulkes wrote: “One step away from storming Heathrow looking for Jewish arrivals…”  Mr Foulkes’s X post was referring to news reports of an anti-Semitic mob that stormed an airport in Dagestan, Russia, looking for Jewish passengers. On Nov 2, six officers arrived at Mr Foulkes’s home, armed with batons and pepper spray. He was arrested, fingerprinted, photographed and swabbed for DNA.  After his home was searched, the retired special constable was locked in a police cell for eight hours and interrogated on suspicion of malicious communications.  Fearing that further escalation could impact his ability to visit his daughter, who lives in Australia, he accepted a caution despite having committed no offence... Mr Philp also called on the Government to support his proposed amendment to Labour’s Crime and Policing Bill, and “abolish non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs)”.  The amendment will seek to block police forces keeping records on individuals who have not broken the law but are accused of expressing views or behaviour deemed offensive."
Terrorism supporters still claim the UK is a Zionist colony because they're not free to attack Jews in public or attack people with sledgehammers

Emily Schrader - אמילי שריידר امیلی شریدر on X - "For years, Israel was accused of “targeting journalists” in Gaza. Now Al Jazeera has fired 24 Gaza-based staff amid a US lawsuit alleging ties and support by the Qatari network to Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad"
Mark R. Levin on X - "You mean these “ journalists” were terrorists or tied to terrorists?   Will we hear this in most of our media as they preach about journalism freedom?"
Clearly, Al-Jazeera is controlled by "Zionists" too

Meme - The Greasy Walrus of Monte Cristo: "Meet Kathryn Tagseth, member of the Ontario College of Teachers. Complaint filed with @OCT_OEEO three months ago. Zero action taken."
K. Tagseth: "Jewish fiction. The bible was written by Jews for Jews. None of it is true. Their jealous, controlling god was created in their image. No perfect god would choose such defective, inbred, inhuman specimens of humanity. The mistake called Israel is really part of Palestine."
Of course, we know she meant "Zionists"

Meme - "Netta. 32. Woman. Bisexual. 19 miles away. 3 shared desires
Israeli visiting NYC. Very into the idea of meeting pro-Palestine partners who'd enjoy turning that tension into something physical, playful, and consensually humiliating."

Palestine Action activists ‘attacked guards with kebab skewers’ - "Palestine Action activists armed with “large kebab skewers” attacked security guards during a break-in at an Israel-linked weapons manufacturer, a court has heard.  Qesser Zuhrah, 21, Zahra Farooque, 26, Kamran Ahmed, 29, Heba Muraisi, 31, and Liam Mullany, 34, went on trial at Woolwich Crown Court on Friday charged with criminal damage and violent disorder over the break-in in the early hours of Aug 6, 2024. The court heard that a security guard suffered a 4cm laceration to his head after being attacked at an Elbit Systems site in Filton near Bristol. The firm’s parent company is based in Israel and manufactures defence technology equipment, including drones. The five defendants are accused of being part of a “black team”, wearing black jumpsuits, whose role was to overwhelm security guards so a “red team”, wearing red jumpsuits, “could break into the factory and start smashing up property”. Opening the trial, Deanna Heer KC, the prosecutor, said: “The black team did that by threatening, intimidating and, if necessary, assaulting the guards by throwing fireworks at them, brandishing weapons such as whips and hammers and large metal kebab skewers.”  Ms Heer added: “The attack was carefully planned, not only had the premises been targeted in advance, but willing participants had been identified and a step-by-step plan of action devised and agreed upon. Everyone taking part knew what their role was and what was required.”  Footage of the break-in, shown to jurors, appeared to show black team members lighting fireworks and flares and firing them at security guards, while others cracked whips and raised kebab skewers as they swore and shouted at guards to “back off”... The prosecutor said Nigel Shaw, a security guard, had suffered the laceration to his head after being struck by members of the black team, who all wore masks... All five defendants deny charges of criminal damage and violent disorder."
Clearly, it was self-defence, like the sledgehammer. Why are Zionists so terrified of accountability?!
When left wingers proclaim that people can't be masked, they mean people they disagree with

Police foil Yom Kippur terror plot in Manchester - "A spokesman for the CAA said: “For the second Yom Kippur running, Jews in Manchester have been targeted by terrorists.  “This year, the attack was foiled. But the attacks keep coming. That’s because essentially nothing has changed in law enforcement policy since this time last year.  “The Government has found plenty of time for signalling faux virtue on foreign policy but has yet to take the fight to Islamists and other extremists fuelling the life-and-death anti-Semitism crisis right here at home.”  The CAA said it was grateful to the authorities for their “vigilance”, but added: “The Jewish community cannot rely on that forever.”  “The authorities need to get lucky every time and the terrorists only once. Until the threat itself is confronted, British Jews will never be safe.”"
Damn Mossad!
Time to do more about Islamophobia

NHS consultant shared cartoon of Netanyahu operating Holocaust oven - "An NHS consultant shared a cartoon showing Benjamin Netanyahu pushing a coffin draped in a Palestinian flag into a Nazi concentration camp oven.  Dr Mazin Fageir, a senior trauma and orthopaedic surgeon and consultant at the Royal Free Hospital, London, shared the image in May 2021 of the Israeli prime minister operating an oven of the kind used during the Holocaust... The cartoon, which accentuates the Jewish leader’s ears and nose, was reportedly drawn by Vasco Gargalo, a Portuguese cartoonist... Dr Fageir, who remains registered with the UK General Medical Council (GMC), also responded to reports of a rocket hitting a house in Israel by saying: “Great news… May all the Palestinian rockets hit their targets, amen. Indeed Israeli terrorists will be wiped out one day and Palestine will be free.”  In 2021, the consultant wrote: “The two Jewish states in the history of mankind are of similar length, time wise, 70-75 years. The end of this terrorist state is nigh, very nigh indeed.” To mark the anniversary of 9/11 in 2024, he reposted an AI image of Orthodox Jewish men celebrating in front of the Twin Towers as a plane approaches.  The graphic refers to the debunked “dancing Israelis” conspiracy theory which claims Israeli men were seen standing on top of a delivery van in New Jersey high-fiving and smiling as the attack unfolded... In June, ministers accepted recommendations from Lord Mann, the Government’s anti-Semitism adviser, and recommended measures including mandatory anti-Semitism training and restrictions on political symbols.  However, the British Medical Association voted to oppose the recommendations and seek an “immediate pause”, warning of implications for freedom of expression."
Time to crack down on "far right" NHS members. Anyone waving a British flag must be fired

Magistrate said Jews are attacked ‘when Israel wants to divert attention’ - "A magistrate who suggested terror attacks on Jewish people in Britain were timed to divert attention from Israel has been reprimanded for serious misconduct.  Ansar Gulzar was disciplined after four of his Facebook posts were judged to have shown he “held a prejudicial view of matters involving Jewish people and Israel”.  The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) delivered the verdict after a campaign group complained about comments Mr Gulzar had made in the aftermath of an attack at a Manchester synagogue on Yom Kippur in which two people died.  On Oct 2, 2025, the day of the attack, Mr Gulzar wrote: “My thoughts and prayers are with the victims of Manchester. Every life matters. Question bothering me is why there is always an attack on a Jewish person when Israel wants to divert media attention?”  The JCIO judged that the comments had the “potential to cause emotional harm and undermine public confidence in the judiciary”. UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) said the statement advanced a conspiratorial narrative by suggesting that violence against Jewish people was connected to Israel seeking to manipulate media coverage.  In another of Mr Gulzar’s posts, from June 2025, he said: “America has a long & brutal history of slave trade. Africans were American slaves between 16th & 19th century. Americans are Israeli slaves from 19th century.”  A further post on Jan 17, 2026, was judged to have presented Israel as a uniquely manipulative force responsible for destabilising countries across the Middle East... Mr Gulzar, a member of the Buckinghamshire bench of magistrates, had also breached guidance on the use of social media, which advises judges and magistrates to avoid controversial social or political comment."
Clearly, Mossad is behind all of the attacks on Jews worldwide, so to keep Jews around the world safe, Israel must be destroyed

Ed Miliband’s silence on the crimes of Palestinians speaks volumes - "“We will never be silent about injustice,” Ed Miliband declared when he outlined new measures against Israel at the Labour Party conference earlier this week. But in truth Britain’s Foreign Secretary is rather partial about the injustices he chooses to be noisy about.  When the victims are citizens of the Jewish state, Miliband suddenly becomes cautious. Faced with an attempted mass killing of passengers on a Flydubai flight to Tel Aviv, he offered this bland statement: “Deeply concerned about the incident that occurred on the Flydubai flight to Israel.”  After all, it was only an apparent attempt to murder 174 people – not construction of new homes near the Dead Sea. He displayed no such caution in his speech to Labour conference. The Foreign Secretary paid lip service by condemning Hamas before clarifying that Israel is committing ethnic cleansing and war crimes. In practice, mentioning Hamas only made the situation worse: he equated the barbaric terrorist organisation with the state of Israel that was defending itself against it. It is true that Miliband did not remain silent when the Iranians slaughtered thousands of their own people in the streets. In fact, he spoke out loudly – but against any response.  It was he who, in the British cabinet meeting on the eve of the “Epic Fury” operation, is reported to have led the opposition to allowing the United States to use British military bases for attacks on the Ayatollah’s regime. Just last week, he held a friendly meeting at the UN with the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi,. Winston Churchill was lucky not to have a foreign secretary who met Joachim von Ribbentrop and prevented Roosevelt from using bases in London to prepare for D-Day. If Miliband truly believes that he “will never be silent in the face of injustice and suffering”, how does he continue to cultivate the Palestinian Authority, whose laws forbid the sale of land to Jews?... Did Miliband himself, with his immense sensitivity to human life, ever shout on the phone at the president of the Palestinian Authority over the law that allocates roughly 7 per cent of the PA’s budget to murderers of Jews, where the more you murder, the more you receive? Did he freeze aid budgets until the Palestinian education system in the West Bank stops, in the words of former Labour MP Joan Ryan, “teaching a curriculum which incites violence and terrorism and spreads anti-Semitism”?  There is an attempt at ethnic cleansing between the Jordan River and the sea, and it is by the Palestinians against the Jews. There is a fierce debate between Israel and Britain regarding the future of Judea and Samaria. This is a legitimate political debate. There is violence by Jewish extremists against Palestinians in the West Bank. This is a despicable phenomenon, although even in the West Bank it is not the worst instance of violence. Palestinian terrorist organisations try to murder Israelis every single day, yet Miliband hardly bothers to condemn it. Labour has – in practice if not in rhetoric – consistently acted to preserve Hamas’s rule in Gaza even after the atrocities of October 7. They have done this by demanding time and again for the war to stop before the terrorist organisation has been eliminated. Now, it is doing its best to establish a terror state five minutes away from Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. It is no wonder that no government formed in Israel after October’s elections, no matter how Left-wing it may be, will be able to allow the establishment of such a state. When it slaughters Jews, Miliband is sure to do his best to prevent Israel from fighting it. If someone got their news on world events exclusively from the British Foreign Secretary’s X account, they might think that the greatest evil empire in the world is Israel, followed – after a massive gap – by Russia, Iran, and perhaps North Korea. The reason for this assault on the Jewish state is political: the strengthening of the Green Party with its fiercely “anti-Zionist” platform. That is why the campaign against Israel has ratcheted up with the arrival of party conference season. Miliband will run every red light on his way to stopping the Greens. If Labour were led by the successors of Harold Wilson, Tony Blair, and Gordon Brown, it would be busy moving toward the centre and caring for the average Briton. It would be busy eradicating the anti-Semitism spreading throughout Britain, and would do all in its power to ensure the four independent “pro-Gaza” MPs elected in 2024 would be defeated at the next election.  But the current Labour Party is the heir of Jeremy Corbyn. Its current stance should require the party to apologise for expelling him from its ranks: today, there are very many Corbyns within Labour’s ranks.  Miliband is not the first Jew to joyfully point a false and accusing finger at his own people. If he comes to Jerusalem, he should watch out for heckling directed at him. If he went to Ramallah and didn’t have the security that goes with being Britain’s Foreign Secretary, as a Jew he would have to fear much worse."

Simone Rodan-Benzaquen on X - "The German Greens have officially distanced themselves from the Green Party of England and Wales over its "Zionism is Racism" resolution. translated: "This resolution contradicts the principles of the European Green Party (EGP), which is committed to a two-state solution and peaceful coexistence in Israel and Palestine. The resolution also runs counter to our convictions and core values as Bündnis 90/Die Grünen: we stand firmly for Israel's right to exist.. » The EGP brings together 39 independent Green parties. We welcome the fact that the GPEW will soon lose its voting rights in the European Green Party in any case.""

Jewish students at UK universities sent death threats - "The messages, which have been seen by The Telegraph, include: “calm yourself f----t Jew bag”, “I am gonna murder this racist p----k” and “tell me where he lives and where I can find it, leave it to me”... He added that individuals left sticky notes on his university corridor stating: “We are watching you Israeli” and we are “coming for the Israelis”. Mr Barstys is not Israeli, but Israeli students live on his corridor... Another testimony in the report was an incident at the University of Birmingham, where a kippah-wearing student and his housemates were reportedly followed home by four university-aged men.  The men allegedly climbed onto the railings outside his house and started shrieking: “Dirty Jews” and “Jews live here” to passers-by walking down the residential student hotspot of Selly Oak, according to the report... Bracha Jacobs, a Jewish student, claimed anti-Semitism had become normalised among students and “religious students expect to be heckled, harassed, and honked at in the street” while walking to and from campus”. She said Jewish students had been stopped and asked whether they “had any diamonds”, while walking home from a community Friday night dinner.  Jewish students have also been told to “go back to America,” “go back to Poland,” and “go back to Auschwitz” and have been identified by their so-called “Jewish noses” while out at bars and nightclubs in the city.  Another was told by a lecturer that their name was peculiar and “very Jewish”. They even suggested the student shorten it... At City St George’s, footage has emerged showing a student chanting in Arabic “Al Yahud Bara Bara” which translates to “Jew, get out! Get out!”"
It's all their fault for being "Zionists"!

Meme - "Omar and Hobbes by Darren Cullen
Omar: ISRAELI SOLDIERS APPROACHING! *Omar and Hobbes getting ready to sprint*
Omar: Charge! *Omar and Hobbes throw stones*
*Omar is shot in the head while Hobbes is a stuffed toy*"

Metropolitan Police on X - ""Just ban it" That was a common response to us urging students not to hold a pro-Palestine protest on Oct 7. We can't ban protests & can only ask the Home Sec to do so if the risk of serious disorder is so high that it can’t be managed by conditions. That's not the case here."
Janice Turner on X - "“We only ban a march when its opponents will be violent. We know Jews won’t kick off, so they have to tolerate a celebration of a recent Jewish massacre.” Violent bullies always win. What a way to police a city."

Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan on X - "90 years ago today, Oswald Mosley and his Blackshirts attempted to march through and intimidate a predominantly Jewish area of the East End.  Men, women and children, alongside local residents, trade unionists and anti-fascist protesters, came together to defend the community in what became known as the Battle of Cable Street.  They taught us an important lesson: communities can resist fascism by joining together.  Hate and antisemitism had no place in London then, and it has no place here now."
Queen Bee on X - "Interesting history lesson, Mayor. You left out one rather awkward detail:  Oswald Mosley was not some creature who appeared fully formed from the "political right". He had been a Labour MP, sat on Labour’s NEC and was a member of the Fabian Society before founding the British Union of Fascists.  Even George Bernard Shaw, one of the great Fabian luminaries, was still publicly praising Mosley in 1932, after the BUF had been founded.  Which does rather spoil the neat little morality tale in which fascism belonged exclusively to “the other side”.  History is considerably more inconvenient than a mayoral tweet.  We see you."
Patrick Christys on X - "We have literally imported an army of antisemites and then been called fascists for not wanting them here. Does Sadiq Khan have no shame?"
Heidi Bachram on X - "A Jew tried to join the Cable Street march today and because he’s a Zionist the ‘antiracists’ physically attacked him and dragged him out. I honestly don’t have words for how scary and disturbing antizionism is."
Left wingers only pretend to care about Jews when they can use that to shit on white people

Captain Allen on X - "Israel was never “given” to the Jews. And the Jews certainly never “stole” it.  They were already there. A continuous presence in Jerusalem, Hebron, Safed, and Tiberias ran through the Roman expulsions and the Crusader and Arab massacres. And in every century, some of the Jews who had been driven out came back.   Zionism did not invent that return. It accelerated it once pogroms in Europe and the Arab world made staying impossible and the United States shut its doors in 1924.  Centuries of neglect under Ottoman rule left the Land mostly arid desert and malaria swamps while being sparsely populated. Jews legally bought large tracts at premium prices from absentee Arab landlords in Beirut, Damascus, and Cairo. The rest was state land that passed from the collapsed Ottoman Empire to the British Mandate.  That Mandate was conferred at San Remo in 1920 and approved by the League of Nations in 1922 as a reconstitution of the Jewish national home and attached a duty to the British to facilitate immigration and close settlement. The 1939 White Paper broke it, and shut the gate on Jewish refugees in the years they were being slaughtered by Nazi bullets and gas in Europe.  The offers of a split came from everyone except the Arab leadership. The Zionist Congress accepted the Peel partition in 1937. The Jewish Agency accepted the UN partition in 1947. The Arab Higher Committee rejected both, and five Arab armies invaded in May 1948 after Israel declared independence and asked the Arabs who stayed to remain as citizens.   Arab Secretary General Azzam Pasha said the war against the Jews would be one of “extermination.”  The country that survived that war was not handed over in a ceremony and not taken from an empty map. It was defended by the people the international agreement had already named, after the other side chose a war over a border."
Minorities only deserve a homeland when it pushes the left wing agenda

Campaign Against Antisemitism on X - "“It’s legally a terrorist organisation.”
“Your opinion is your opinion.”
 If you have wondered why @MetPoliceUK ’s policing of antisemitism and support for terror has been so poor, here is why.  As we have seen at recent protests, anti-Israel demonstrators are now freely showing their support for Hizballah, an antisemitic Iranian proxy that is proscribed as a terrorist organisation under British law.  With the head of MI5 warning about the significant risk posed to the UK by Iranian-backed groups, it has never been more urgent that police understand the very real threat that support for Hizballah and other Islamist terror groups poses to us all.  Here is newly-emerged jaw-dropping footage from London’s Trafalgar Square on 28th September, where a vigil for Hizballah’s leader was taking place in broad daylight.  The video shows what happened when someone tried to inform the police that Hizballah is a terrorist organisation.  How is the Metropolitan Police supposed to protect us when they don’t actually educate their officers on the law?  While these police officers did not conduct themselves satisfactorily, we are posting this video principally because of what it says about the training and priorities of the Metropolitan Police as an institution, and we have therefore chosen to blur their faces."

NizNellie3 on X - "🚨 UPDATE 🚨 Guangtian Ha, the Haverford College professor who was just arrested by the FBI for online harassment is a Muslim from China. He was hiding behind 4 anonymous “MAGA” accounts, repeatedly threatening and harassing Jewish citizens. Professor Ha was  once described by his colleagues as, “one of the most innovative, interesting, and engaged scholars of Islam in China.”
- “Jew get the f*ck out of my country.”
- “If Jews are so special, they should be placed in special camps and receive special treatment.”
In an online interview, he said that it’s important to introduce Islam in China by showing its beauty and charm first, then discuss its politics and tenets. 😬
This lunatic arrived in our nation from Beijing for graduate studies at Columbia University. He has a lengthy history of public antisemitism, but Haverford College refused to fire him. We currently have 40,000 foreign professors on visas in America. Not 400. Not 4,000. 40,000."
Clearly, this is more suppression of "pro-Palestinian" speech, and there's no link between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism

The Biggest Public Attack British Economists Ever Made on a Sitting Government

Trust the Experts! Even when they're wrong!

Left wingers have never forgiven Thatcher for postponing the UK's decline

Students For Liberty | Facebook

The Biggest Public Attack British Economists Ever Made on a Sitting Government
 
On 30 March 1981, 364 economists from across British universities signed an open letter to The Times declaring that the government's anti-inflation strategy had "no basis in economic theory or supporting evidence." It was drafted by Frank Hahn and Robert Neild at Cambridge after Howe's March budget. The signatories included a future Governor of the Bank of England.
 
What They Demanded
 
The letter said Thatcher's policy would deepen the recession and threaten Britain's social and political stability. It called for the rejection of monetarism in favor of "alternative policies." In 1981, that meant the postwar Keynesian formula: more public borrowing, looser money, and state support for failing industry. Thatcher refused to reflate.
 
Britain Was the Sick Man of Europe
 
By 1979 Britain had spent a decade falling behind every major European economy. Inflation hit 24 percent in 1975. The Callaghan government took a $3.9 billion IMF bailout in 1976, the largest in the Fund's history at that point. The Winter of Discontent of 1978-79 left rubbish uncollected and the dead unburied as public sector strikes paralyzed the country. The top marginal tax rate stood at 83 percent on earned income and 98 percent on investment income. The 364 wrote no letter against this.
 
What Thatcher Actually Did
 
She rejected the Keynesian demand that Britain borrow and spend its way out of the recession. The top marginal income tax rate fell from 83 percent to 60 percent in 1979 and to 40 percent by 1988. The basic rate fell from 33 percent to 25 percent. Exchange controls were abolished in October 1979. British Telecom, British Gas, British Airways, and British Steel were sold to the public. The Employment Acts of 1980, 1982, and 1984 broke the unions' power to shut the country down.
 
Britain Began Recovering in 1982
 
GDP turned positive in 1982 and grew for the rest of the decade, peaking at 5 percent a year by 1988. British GDP per capita was growing faster than France's, Germany's, or Italy's, reversing decades of relative decline. The recession the 364 said would deepen ended within twelve months of their letter.
 
The Productivity Gap with Germany Closed for the First Time in a Generation
 
In 1979, West German output per hour worked stood 40 percent above Britain's. By 1989 that advantage had fallen to 17 percent. UK manufacturing output per worker rose roughly 78 percent over the broader period. Britain stopped losing ground to Europe and started catching up.
 
The Industries the Economists Said Couldn't Survive Were Replaced by Something Larger
 
On 27 October 1986 the Big Bang deregulated the London Stock Exchange. Fixed commissions ended and electronic trading began. Within a decade London had reclaimed its position as a top-tier global financial center. The capital the 364 said would vanish reorganized itself around higher-value activity.
 
They Never Retracted. They Were Promoted.
 
No collective retraction was ever issued. The signatories who later addressed the letter defended it as substantively correct, arguing the recovery happened despite the policy rather than because of it. Mervyn King, one of the 364, became Governor of the Bank of England. Stephen Nickell joined the Monetary Policy Committee.
 
The most prominent failed forecast in postwar British economics produced no professional consequences.
 
The Same Pattern Repeated in 2023
 
In October 2023, 108 economists including Thomas Piketty and Gabriel Zucman signed an open letter warning that a Milei victory would cause "devastation" in Argentina.
 
He won. Monthly inflation fell from 25.5 percent in December 2023 to roughly 2 percent by mid-2025. Poverty dropped from 52.9 percent in early 2024 to 28.2 percent in the second half of 2025.
 
The Mechanism Repeats Because Nobody Pays for Being Wrong
 
A credentialed body issues a collective denunciation. Major outlets treat the letter as expert consensus. The policy succeeds anyway. No retraction follows, because the professional cost of being publicly wrong about a major economic prediction inside academic economics is approximately zero.
 
Thatcher Is Hated Because She Was Right
 
The results vindicated her and condemned her critics. People who build their identity around a vision of the world do not abandon that vision when the data contradicts it. They attack whoever the data vindicates. Her record is what their careers were built against. That is why the hatred has not faded in forty years.

Links - 9th October 2026 (1 - Women)

Meme - "How did we make skinny + nice tits "unrealistic" but only in the US? *Scarlett Johansson, Salma Hayek, Brie Larson, Elizabeth Olsen, Kat Dennings, Hayley Atwell*"

I prefer my iPhone to my wife - "There have been times when my wife has walked into the room and I have thrust the device under a blanket to avoid a row. If I did that with my wife I would still be able to hear her muffled demands that I mow the grass, take the bins out or walk the dogs for the third time that day. My phone does not nag me and I love it for that. I choose when to interact with it and if I want to go for a snooze I just press its little button and all is peaceful with the world. My wife, sadly, has no such button."

Proving again Feminism is where Irony goes to die, the Guardian bemoans the lack of privacy for an all female app designed to destroy male privacy. : r/MensRights
On the Tea app

DiscussingFilm on X - "‘OBSESSION’ has become one of the top 10 highest grossing horror movies of all time in the U.S."
Mr Melancholy on X - "For those confused by Obsession's massive success let me break it down for you the best I can. Curry barker has essentially tapped into the genz female lizard brain with this movie.  The same female lizard brain which ranks nice guys worst than actual rspists and criminals. Why is it so? I don't know but every girl has her Bear and has utter unrealised hate against them which never gets released  But here in the movie their greatest horror fantasy of loving a loser and him being actually bad gets realised and their unrealised hate gets a channel. Thats why you have seen 160,000,000 women write the same essay on the movie.   This is a generational movie because it's the first time a genz director has used his street knowledge subtly and made millions off of it."

Meme - Emir Han @RealEmirHan: "Tom Cruise refused to do a kiss scene with Annabelle Wallis at the last minute in The Mummy. She had already told all her friends about the scene and was showing off. Then, in front of 900 people, Cruise reportedly said: "Yeah, I'm not feeling it?""
Lia the Trader @Liathetrader: "I honestly think he is gay"
Julius @TodayWithJulius: "If the woman didn't want to do a kiss scene is she a lesbian?"
This is like how shaming men who disagree with women that they will be virgins for life and can't get laid is good and fighting toxic masculinity, but saying a woman is ugly or has a high body count is proof of misogyny

Meme - 6t @LoliMossad: "Oh but if I hate black pp! due to personal experience everyone cries racism"
rudy2gen: ""Bears or men?"
Women: Bear because (personal experience) Bear because (personal experience) Bear because (personal experience) Bear because (personal experience) Bear because (personal experience) Bear because (personal experience) Bear because (personal experience) Bear because (personal experience) Bear because (personal experience) Bear because (personal experience) ...
Men: "y'all just hate men for no reason""

Meme - Texture @iamtexture: "Women are significantly more sensitive to these types of faces and this is the primary way that women signal to each other that they are about to be excluded from the group if they don't conform."
Andy @PositivFuturist: "When your entire worldview is based not on knowledge, but on what others think - the only possible rebuttal is a performance." *Sarah Wakefield from UK Green Party when faced with Reform panellist* *Katherine Stoeffel from GQ Sydney Sweeney interview*"

STUNNER on X - "I’ve never seen a video of a man celebrating his divorce.  Never seen a man set up ring light to announce his divorce and blame his wife.     I’ve never seen a man talk about a ‘divorce glow-up.’  I’ve never seen a man celebrate putting his own happiness above his family.  I’ve never seen a man proudly leave his marriage and family to ‘find himself.’  I rarely see men openly talk about stress related to mental load or emotional labor, especially as fathers.  I’ve never seen a man leave a relationship because his partner didn’t keep him in his ‘masculine era.’  Why is it always women? Why is it always you? Why can’t you just move on silently like the man?"

Meme - *Janitor looking down at floor while mopping it*
Bratz doll: "OMG, that man just looked at you!"
Bratz doll 2: "Eww! What a creep!"

Squirrelly Girl | Facebook - "Ladies, I'm about to make a lot of y'all really mad but no one ever said accountability was fun so, here goes... Let’s talk dress codes — specifically school dress codes. All my life, I've heard, "Girls can’t wear certain things because boys get distracted!” and, as you can imagine, this bothered me. I think it would bother anyone because last I checked, teen boys don't care what you wear. Males in general, you could be wearing a potato sack and they'd still stare and say, "pretty!" (Marylin Monroe actually did this once, it was glorious). And then one day I found myself talking to an actual superintendent in the grocery line, and I decided to actually ask if the reason we've always been given is the actual reason and — drum roll please! — turns out computer says no (internet cookie for whoever catches this reference). The real reason is so politically incorrect they had to come up with a more socially acceptable answer and, true to form, decided the way to accomplish that was to throw our boys under the bus. Typical really, and not at all as surprising as it should be. Here’s the truth — starting in the mid 90s, schools all across the US found themselves drowning in so many accusations against male teachers and staff from  parents of teen girls that they had to change the dress code. That's it, that's the whole secret. And before you lot get your panties in a twist, let me explain. Male teachers were not getting reported for actual inappropriate behavior, no-no, they were getting reported for the appearance of inappropriate behavior. Things like:
• looking up when a female student walked in
• picking up dropped papers near a female student
• monitoring hallways between classes and accidently "looking" too long
• existing within five feet of a female student because apparently that in and of itself is inherently predatory.
In decades past, reports like this weren't given much credence. But then, the parents of students in the 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s weren't letting their daughters go to school dressed like they were going to the club. It's even worse now and instead of just saying, “Hey, maybe don’t send your daughter to 9th grade looking like she’s on Love Island,” schools did and are still doing the politically safe thing: blaming the boys. Over night, every hemline rule got reframed as, “boys can’t control themselves," instead of the truth; Male teachers cant afford lawsuits. It's not about hormones, it's about liability and the longer we pretend otherwise, the longer we keep pointing fingers at the wrong people. #uncomfortabletruths #scapegoat #blametheboys #dresscode"

Love, Marriage, and Anxiety - "The saying "happy wife, happy life" may have some validity, but the lesser-known saying "anxious wife, miserable life" has research-approved validation.  How can we overcome anxiety and improve marital satisfaction?...
The results found a direct relationship between the following:
1. The number of children you have and marital satisfaction, with fewer children being related to happier marriages.
2. The number of family members who are available to help with the children is directly related to greater marital satisfaction.
3. Both partners' level of depression affected their level of happiness: lower levels of depression are associated with happier marriages.
4. The more neurotic the spouse is, the less happy the relationship—but women's neuroticism seems to carry more weight in the overall marital happiness equation...
Neurotic people assume the worst in an innocuous situation. They fear an unknown danger around every corner because you just don't know what can happen... Women will often trip over their high levels of neurosis and stumble into unhappiness in their marriage...   For neurotic women, their brain may be the biggest opponent in the quest for a happy marriage."

👹Eamon Fitzpatrick🇮🇪 on X - "When your wife asks you what you want for Father's Day tell her you already have the best gift of all which is her and the kids. Tell her Father's Day isn't about demanding gifts and attention. That's Mother's Day🎁😂 #FathersDay"

Aruvin 💊 on X - "If we're in such a "male loneliness epidemic," why is it that: 1. The single events are all filled with women? 2. The crying videos on TikTok are all from women? 3. The ones complaining about not being approached are all women? 🤔"

Arslan on X - "“Your man used to eat my ass” “I ate his and the next day he proposed”"

Jaimie Arona Krems on X - "A rarely-discussed female beauty standard: LUMBAR CURVATURE (~45.5°)
➡️Men prefer this curve
➡️Women wear heels to mimic it
Why? Acc to @dmglewis: Our bipedal female ancestors w this curve likely better navigated physiological challenges of pregnancy"
Weird. I thought women dress up for themselves

Meme - "UH OH! Did you make a woman angry online? She's going to use some form of one of these insults:
1. Your dick is small
2. Your dick doesn't receive enough attention from women
3. You like putting your dick inside other men
It's literally a guarantee!

Meme - ">be me
>save up money for weeks to take girlfriend to a nice steakhouse
>buy her favorite flowers on the way
>open the car door for her, pull out her chair, plan the entire evening
>think I am crushing the boyfriend game
>she stares at her phone during appetizers
>she looks up with an expression of pure disgust
>sends me a link to a viral article
>"The Danger of High Effort Men and Love Bombing Culture"
>caption says men who plan dates and buy flowers are pathologically manipulative
>apparently trying too hard means you lack boundaries and seek total control
>look down at the $80 ribeye i just ordered for her
>ask her if she actually thinks this way
>she hits me with the silent treatment for the rest of the dinner
>makes me pay the full bill, then posts on her story about surviving a narcissist
>go home alone
>realize the internet has completely ruined them"

Meme - ex-bisexual @spookyshah: "had a straight dude come to my place and he was SO impressed by the simplest things. art on the wall, rugs, a $40 knife block set. dudes are so fucking lame and pathetic lol they fr need a mommy to take care of them their whole lives"
Figure 1: "nice house :)"
Figure 2: "you are so fucking lame and pathetic lol fr do you need a mommy to take care of you your whole life"
Figure 1:
Figure 2:

Meme - COURTNEY, 29: ""IF YOU CAN'T HANOLE ME AT MY WORST, YOU DON'T DESERVE ME AT MY BEST.""
HER BEST: "I TRIED TO MAKE SPAGHETTI BUT BURNT IT. SO NOW YOU GET TO TAKE ME OUT"
HER WORST: "WHO THE FUCK IS JENNA!?" *pouring fuel onto ground and flames all around in house, holding phone with dangling wire that's one*
"MY SISTER!!!"

Parent advice: My daughter and stepson have gotten really close. At first, it was heartwarming. Now it's taken a turn. - "I’m married to a wonderful man, “Corbin.” Corbin and I each have a child from a previous relationship. I bring “Adela,” age 14, to our blended family, while he has a 6-year-old son, “Ron.” Given the fairly large age gap between the two children, I had kind of expected the most likely interaction between them would be “not much,” and kept an eye out for signs of hostility or impatience. That hasn’t happened. Adela is very fond of Ron, and that’s reciprocated.  In the abstract, that isn’t a problem, but they spend a lot of time together, often in physical contact. Ron sits on Adela’s lap a lot, and it’s a fairly common occurrence for her to be doing homework or just watching TV, and Ron will kind of be leaning into her and napping with his head pressed into her side. She’ll play with LEGOS with him, when she never expressed an interest before.  I’ve asked her about it, and Adela’s told me that “he needs a mother figure in his life,” which, apart from the implicit sexism in that claim, would be my job if he’s willing to accept me as one. I’m not sure this level of attachment is healthy, and I’m not sure what to do about it."
When you're jealous of your daughter. No surprise that she spouts feminist ideas too

Meme - Wandering2Wise: "Everyone sees a husband who cheated on his wife of 20 years. No one sees he's been begging her to sleep with him for the last 10 years. He provided. Protected. Stayed faithful. But she withheld. Weaponized intimacy. "Not tonight, I'm tired." "I have a headache. Maybe tomorrow." Then acted shocked when another woman made him feel like a man. Cheating is wrong. But so is starving your husband then playing victim when he eats elsewhere. A man can only beg for so long before his pride says "enough." Sex isn't everything in marriage. But lack of sex kills everything in marriage. Respect. Intimacy. Loyalty. Love. All of it dies in a cold bed."

Meme - Peter Parker: "Hey, Ursula! If you were alone in the woods, would you rather encounter a man or a bear?"
Ursula Ditkovna: "It depends on what color it is"
Peter:

'Everyone I've Ever Dated Was A Narcissist,' Says Woman Who Is Clearly A Narcissist | Babylon Bee

What my dating experience has been like as a woman : r/TwoXChromosomes - "I have been on 29 dates in the last year, all with men in their late twenties and early thirties. I thought I would share my list that details why it didn’t work out with you all. I would love to hear about other women’s experiences with this too, keen to know how universal my experiences might be!
1. Homeless (by choice)
2. Chronic physical and mental health problems that were ongoing and untreated
3. Enjoyed Joe Rogan and Jordan Peterson
4. Struggled with alcohol use (20-30 drinks a week to cope with work stress)
5. Spent the entire date negging me (actually kind of impressive how long he did this)
6. Nice guy but very avoidant/emotionally unavailable. Would probably have stayed in a situationship with me forever if I didn’t break it off.
7. Completely misleading photos, looked like a different person in real life
8. Very low self esteem, cried on the date, had recently broken up with his long term girlfriend (who he still lived with). Still tried to invite me back to his house to have sex with him.
9. Lied about his name (twice) and age. Anti-vax, made lots of jokes about women being bad drivers, etc.
10. couldn’t have a conversation to save his life. Had no opinions on anything and would repeat whatever you said. High levels of anxiety, saw this guy a few times before calling it.
11. Pictures were very misleading. Spent most of the date talking about his special interests.
12. Arrogant and entitled. Spent most of the date disagreeing with anything I said (e.g., even explained why my favourite food was a bad choice)
13. nice guy but not very intelligent (e.g., had to define words like “maternal” and explain that white people could also have naturally curly hair). Ended up being too difficult to have conversations with him because of the amount of explaining that was required.
14. Arrogant. Didn’t ask a single question and spent a large portion of time telling me why being an engineer was the most difficult career known to man.
15. Substance use issues (primarily marijuana and alcohol). Struggled with codependency, high levels of anxiety.
16. Used to kill small animals as a child, don’t think I need to say anything else about this one.
17. Spent 90% of the date talking about his love for bicycles (no, he did not ask me if I was interested in biking). Expressed a desire to have 3 children and home school them (no, he did not ask me about my family plans or future goals). This was not mentioned on his profile at all.
18. Tried to convince me how awful cats are (despite me having 3 photos with them on my profile. Apparently he had not checked this before he invited me out).
19. Photos were very misleading. Spoke a lot about his special interests (anime, dinosaurs). Asked me exactly 2 questions.
20. Really great guy. Got my hopes up for this one. Shared a lot of values. He was quite anxious and I thought it would settle down but he ended up having a bit of a freak out and called it off.
21. Ended up being poly and didn’t think he needed to share this in advance?
22. Was in the army and couldn’t comprehend why/how this could be a dealbreaker for women. Didn’t share this on his profile or in the chat when asked about work.
23. Very, very anxious. Signs of OCD, quite rigid and easily stressed.
24. Another Jordan Peterson fan. Wanted kids but didn’t include it on his profile. Kept trying to make out with me on the first date in public despite me asking him to stop.
25. Lots of problems. Made racist, homophobic, and sexist jokes. Would use the f-slur. Very gropey, wouldn’t stop after being told no.
26. Misleading photos. Genuinely some of the worst conversation I have ever had, it gave me secondhand embarrassment.
27. Out of work for several years due to an ongoing wrist injury. Severe depression that was “untreatable”. Experienced sudden and random ailments that required him to be taken care of and/or excused from any prior plans.
28. Another one who used misleading photos. He also didn’t live in the same country and was happy to do a long distance relationship but didn’t mention this on his profile.
29. Wanted to have 4 children and settle down in a city over an hour away. Also didn’t include this in his profile.
EDIT: just wanted to clarify some things. I’m based in Sydney, Australia. All these men varied in terms of appearance, education, upbringing, etc. I speak to men for 5-7 days before going on a date. Unfortunately it is never really acceptable to be asking questions like “did you kill small animals as a child?” on the apps. Lots of men do weed themselves out during the talking process.  All my first dates tend to be coffee dates. If it’s an evening date it is usually gelato. I pay for 90% of these dates. I don’t have children and don’t want children, this is always included in my profile. I have a cat, this is also in my profile. No, I will not be giving my cat away for a relationship.  I don’t have any issue dating someone with anxiety, depression, etc. However, when it is so bad that I can’t form a connection with you and you can’t do basic day to day things (e.g., develop and maintain friendships, have any sort of income, engage in hobbies) then I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect someone you don’t know to want to develop a relationship with you 🤷🏻‍♀️
EDIT 2: Lots of people are asking about number 20. We went on 7 dates before he called it off. He had never had a serious relationship before, the longest had been 6 months. I genuinely still think he is a great guy and hold no negative feelings about him."

Meme - Saffron Fry: "whoever is sending my dad my OF content I want to tell you he doesn't care, he's aware I've been passed around more than a spliff at snoop doggs house since the age of 15, he's just happy I actually get paid for it now. he's extremely proud"

OnlyFans: Inside the Machine, BBC Three review: This documentary is not what the BBC should be doing - "What is the BBC for? It’s a question central to the current Charter renewal negotiations, and something to which the new director-general has no doubt been giving serious thought. So let me suggest one thing that the BBC really shouldn’t be for: offering advice to people selling porn on OnlyFans. Yet here is OnlyFans: inside the Machine (BBC Three), a documentary doing exactly that, taking an entirely sympathetic view of the “content creators” involved and presenting sex work as a valid career choice for the young (but then, this is a commission for their youth channel). God, it’s depressing."

HakureiRyan on X - "Onlyfans wasn't even originally a porn platform, fun fact! Females just organically flocked to it and turned it into a porn platform. This further debunks the notion that females are victims of the porn industry when they themselves will literally convert a premium content site into a porn site.  In fact, females will do this to any such website that doesn't explicitly ban porn! This is how Patreon is still just a fan site, it explicitly bans porn. It's also why Tumblr was once a major hub for porn and why all cam sites nowadays are explicitly porn sites. Females, of their own will, turned them into such as there was no explicit ban on it."
The overwhelming majority of porn on tumblr wasn't of the users themselves, but otherwise...

Meme - "*OnlyFans*
This website completely debunked the myth that women are victims of the porn industry and were forced into it. I remember how 10 years ago this idea was quite prominent among the anti porn "redpillers"."

Aisha Renee | Facebook - "TOO BROKE FOR ME… I went on a first date with a guy I met online. He seemed cool, confident, and talked a lot about being “established,” so I had certain expectations. When he pulled up to pick me up, it was in a Honda Civic. I know this sounds bad, but I instantly got the ick. I’ve worked hard to get to a certain lifestyle and I only deal with men who are financially secure. To me, the car was a sign we weren’t on the same level. The date itself was fine, but I couldn’t get past it. After he dropped me off, I just ghosted him instead of explaining, because I didn’t want to hurt his feelings or argue about my standards. Now my friends are split — some say I’m allowed to have preferences, others say I was shallow and should’ve at least been honest instead of disappearing."

Diane Yap on X - "Why does she have to go back to work tomorrow?  Because her baby daddy is a loser. If he weren't a loser, she wouldn't have to work if she doesn't want to. She says that she would love to stay on leave longer or do part time "but that's just not our financial situation."  Please, women -- do yourselves a favor. Do not procreate with losers who cannot afford to carry the household (you plus kids) on his income alone. Work if you want, but do not have kids with someone who can't afford them."
♡ Demonetized Honey ♡ on X - "I don’t know what woman needs to hear this but that man trying to provide for his family in an economy where inflation has risen by a total of SIXTY PERCENT in just 20 years has a lot more on his shoulders than any other man in history and he isn’t a “loser” for not being able to cut it on one income. Men are not “losers” for not thriving in an economy not built for them to. Men are not “losers” for struggling on one income in a society that houses and feeds millions of immigrants for free. Men are not losers for failing to be superhuman in a world that treats them barely human. She has to go back to work tomorrow because she lives in a woman ran society that pushed for women like her to return to work tomorrow to fund immigrants over her family."

Mariella Frostrup: ‘As you age, you miss the odd builder’s whistle’
How ignorant. She's encouraging men to engage in sexual violence with other women.

Why are British women's breasts getting bigger? - "Odd things are happening in women's bras. In recent years, the average British bra size has jumped from 34B to 36D, which means that while women's backs have grown one size, breasts have jumped up two... In a country where one in three women is overweight, you'd think there was a simple, fat-related reason for this, but obesity alone doesn't explain the jump in cup size, nor the biggest growth area in bra sales: smaller back size and bigger cup size. Judging by recent underwear figures, there are more slimmer women with larger boobs than ever before. Women are happy about this. Men are happy about this. But no one seems happy to explain why this is happening. Do you know how to work out a bra size? As roughly 50% of the British population wear them, you'd have thought most of them would have an idea. But though a 2009 survey found that the average British woman owns 16 bras at any one time and buys four every year, fitting them is a surprisingly tricky activity. The traditional method reads like an A-level algebra problem. You take a tape measure and wrap it round your chest at the lowest point where a bra sits. You record this figure in inches. You add four to this measurement if the number is even, five if it's odd – and the resultant number is your band size. Then you wrap the tape round again and measure the fullest part of the actual breasts. Next you subtract the band size from breast size to find your cup size. If the numbers are the same, you're an A cup. If there's an inch difference, you're a B; two and you need a C cup and so on. Alternatively, and many bra experts say more accurately, you can weigh your breasts by dunking them into a full bowl of water and measuring the displaced liquid, with 1 litre of water equalling 1kg. It's accurate but useless. You can do precisely nothing with this information, as no bra manufacturer measures boobs by the pound. Unsurprisingly, as no one enjoys maths or physics homework, the modern way to find the correct fit is to go to a shop and get someone else to do it for you...  trained fitters can now be found in almost every lingerie department; instead of relying on water or tape they add an element of mystique to this already complicated process. Fitters are like boob whisperers, their pronouncements made on look and feel as well as measuring... Marks & Spencer reports that about 8,000 women come to their stores for a fitting every week. As a result of all this bra buying and breast scrutiny, we have more information now about the dimensions of the average British boob than ever before. And what's surprising is how wrong most women were about their bra size... Bras are phenomenally complex garments and their construction has long kept designers and engineers busy. As an article entitled "Brassieres: an engineering miracle" from the February 1964 issue of Science and Mechanics journal states: "The challenge of enclosing and supporting a semi-solid mass of variable volume and shape, plus its adjacent mirror image, involves a design effort comparable to that of building a bridge or a cantilevered skyscraper."... She explains that there are 31 components in a bra with a DD+ cup, 10 more than are required for smaller sizes. There's an extra panel of fabric in each cup to allow volume curve. There are slings down the side of the cups that hold the wearer's breasts securely to minimise movement. The underwiring bands have greater stretch to open up and frame the breasts. The underband and shoulder straps are modular, so that some parts stretch while others don't, to create an excellent fit... Improved bra engineering has not improved the disparities in sizing between different brands. "It's a minefield of different sizes out there," says Portsmouth University's Jenny White. "There is no standardisation of sizes across the industry."
From 2010 and previously quoted, but not in such detail

Meme - TaennaVIP @BOOKtaenna: "Just a gentle reminder that the man who "goes to work and to support his family" is sacrificing NOTHING and would still have to work without a family."
Bleed Kelly Green @HurtsTo...: "Just a gentle reminder that the woman who "cleans and cooks for her family" is sacrificing NOTHING and would still have to clean and cook for herself. See how fucking dumb that sounds??"

i/o on X - "On the third or fourth date with a woman years ago, she asked me if there was anything about her that I would change if I could.  I replied: "Yeah, I'd prefer it if you didn't wear any makeup." (Naturally, this comment had no effect on her. She continued to wear makeup.)   I mentioned this to my mother, and she told me that when she and my father began dating he had told her the same thing, and that she found this liberating, and stopped wearing makeup.  But when I talk to younger women about this, they all say the same thing: "Those women that look good and that you think aren't wearing makeup are in fact wearing makeup, only they're so adept at applying it, you don't realize that they're wearing it."  I doubt this. In my dating history, all of my girlfriends looked more appealing to me before they applied their makeup. (Also, the whole concept of painting one's face as a normal routine seems bizarre to me.)  I realize I'm a outlier on this.   (One of the most unsettling sights for me is seeing women with very thin lips wearing bright or dark red lipstick. Why would someone want to draw attention to an impoverished feature?)"

Romantic opportunities appear to influence women's sexual identities, but not men's - "Romantic opportunities appear to influence women's sexual identities—but not men's, suggests a new study that will be presented at the 110th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association (ASA).  "This indicates that women's sexuality may be more flexible and adaptive than men's," said study author Elizabeth Aura McClintock, an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Notre Dame.  McClintock's study relies on data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) and considers its first (1994-1995), third (2001-2002), and fourth (2007-2008) waves. More specifically, she tracked 5,018 women and 4,191 men as they moved from adolescence to young adulthood. On average, they were 16-years-old in Wave I, 22 in Wave III, and 28 in Wave IV.   Confirming previous research, McClintock found that women were more likely than men to report bisexuality, while men were more likely to report being either "100 percent heterosexual" or "100 percent homosexual." She also found that women were three times more likely than men to change their sexual identities from Wave III to Wave IV of Add Health...   McClintock's research showed that women with more education and women who were more physically attractive (as rated by their Add Health interviewers) had higher probabilities of identifying as "100 percent heterosexual" than other women in Waves III and IV of Add Health"
In other words, lesbians are ugly
Weird, we keep being told that sexuality is immutable. Sexual orientation supposedly never changes, so these women must be lying

Keywords: Lesbians are less attractive than straight women, lesbians are uglier than straight women

Facial Structure Predicts Sexual Orientation in Both Men and Women - "Biological models have typically framed sexual orientation in terms of effects of variation in fetal androgen signaling on sexual differentiation, although other biological models exist. Despite marked sex differences in facial structure, the relationship between sexual orientation and facial structure is understudied. A total of 52 lesbian women, 134 heterosexual women, 77 gay men, and 127 heterosexual men were recruited at a Canadian campus and various Canadian Pride and sexuality events. We found that facial structure differed depending on sexual orientation; substantial variation in sexual orientation was predicted using facial metrics computed by a facial modelling program from photographs of White faces. At the univariate level, lesbian and heterosexual women differed in 17 facial features (out of 63) and four were unique multivariate predictors in logistic regression. Gay and heterosexual men differed in 11 facial features at the univariate level, of which three were unique multivariate predictors. Some, but not all, of the facial metrics differed between the sexes. Lesbian women had noses that were more turned up (also more turned up in heterosexual men), mouths that were more puckered, smaller foreheads, and marginally more masculine face shapes (also in heterosexual men) than heterosexual women. Gay men had more convex cheeks, shorter noses (also in heterosexual women), and foreheads that were more tilted back relative to heterosexual men. Principal components analysis and discriminant functions analysis generally corroborated these results. The mechanisms underlying variation in craniofacial structure--both related and unrelated to sexual differentiation--may thus be important in understanding the development of sexual orientation."

Thursday, October 08, 2026

Links - 8th October 2026 (2 - Cornell "Rape")

Daniel Friedman on X - "The difference between Cornell and Duke Lacrosse or UVA or Kavanaugh is that the men in this case did have sex with the accuser. The Duke Lacrosse allegations were entirely fabricated, the accused UVA rapist did not even exist and there is, to this day, no evidence that Christine Blasey Ford ever met Brett Kavanaugh. At least four of the 7 accused men at Cornell had sex with Jane Doe, by all accounts. What exists here is an unusual number of witnesses who allege that everything was consensual and that Jane Doe was an active and willing participant in the events (because it was group sex), as well as Jane Doe’s various statements to numerous other people, some of which were recorded and preserved as text messages. When she went to the police, she gave multiple hours of interviews during which she was accompanied by a victim advocate and a TIX administrator. These interviews resulted in a six-page single-spaced detailed document of all the events of that night, as she alleged them, sworn under penalty of perjury. Her narrative failed to allege any criminal act under New York State law, because she acknowledged consent to have sex with these men. The outrage over this incident stems from the perception that the sex acts described were so gross and squalid that no woman would consent to them, which runs contra to Jane Doe’s own statements acknowledging she was “into this three-way” and that “nothing illegal happened.” She conceded that she consented in a sworn statement to the police. The other widely held view is that she was unable to consent to these acts because she was intoxicated. But in New York, the standard is clear: Someone who is intoxicated on substances they have voluntarily consumed can consent to sex if they are conscious and able to speak to articulate their unwillingness to do something. So Jane Doe consented. There is no legal argument that her consent was invalid. She said she consented repeatedly in writing — in text messages to the accused and in her statement to the police. When she now says these acts were nonconsensual, she is disputing not just the men’s narrative but her own previous statements. This is dismissed by her advocates as a trauma response — that victims often deny what happened to them until some time later when they process and acknowledge it. So now, we are expected to hand down very serious punishment on the basis of claims from someone whose story keeps changing. But these guys did run a gross sticky train on this girl while she was drunk and high on a dirty frat-house mattress, and they did send the “free pussy” message to their group text, and they did gossip about her after it happened, and they did do ketamine and gave Jane Doe ketamine. They’re incredibly gross and unsympathetic figures even if she willingly had sex with them and acknowledged consent in writing multiple times, they will not be able to vindicate themselves as fully as some other prominent figures who beat false accusations."
Basically feminists say women can't be trusted and no means no but yes also means no. Jane Doe wanted to take the ketamine too but somehow few are condemning her for that

Nietzsche’s Retarded Stallion (NRS) on X - "Every young man of the Cornell 7 should be given 7 figure payouts. In college I was accused of rape on multiple occasions and the one that was most destructive to my life and completely uprooted me was literally planned out over several days post hoc after a girl I never slept with or was ever meaningfully alone with got in trouble for saying she wanted to sleep with me and flirting with me in public when I was on a clear off limits list by her friend group who told her if anything happened between us she would be expelled from the group. In other instance, there was a frat guy who lived down the street from me (I was not in a frat myself fwiw here) and one girl accused him of rape and all of a sudden every night there were protests by the hundreds outside this guys house and they would stand there in his yard for hours and hours late unto the evening holding signs and screaming things like "CHOP HIS BALLS OFF" and eventually he had to effectively be evacuated from his place and find somewhere else to live because it was too dangerous for him to be there. And what's worse in this instance is that the girl who made the accusation against him eventually quietly rescinded it and admitted she made it up and yet not a single woman I ever talked to at those "protests" ever apologised or exemplified even an iota of remorse for what they did to this poor guy. When women congregate they always encourage the worst behavior, but when it becomes too much or reflects themselves too poorly via shining a light on the type of people they are/hang out with, they shamelessly and unilaterally weaponize every social grace that has ever been afforded them to protect the lowest common denominator of whatever they consist of to protect their status and fragile self-images, and engage in mob politics for the thrill of it. This behavior is simply put, not acceptable. It cannot be tolerated any longer and anyone who trivialises it is an enemy. Every girl that posts something like this should eventually be stripped of all financial means and perhaps and then some. It is all so incredibly tiresome and sooner or later an example must be set. The women must be punished and the men must be patronised just lile we did with Chud, Shiloh, and others, and socialboundaries need to be established once and for all."

OutspokenSamantha on X - "The leftist women screaming the loudest about the Cornell 7 case do not care about Jane Doe AT ALL. Quite the opposite. Their outrage is 100% about themselves. Period. These women are euphoric at the possibility that another woman was traumatized. They don't care about what she endured - they're thrilled because her pain gives them another excuse to scream that men are evil. It's an addiction. Hating men is the drug - and they're always desperate to get their next hit."

Frannie Block on X - "The Cornell 7 lawsuit served the wrong guy. Now, his family has faced harassment and death threats from the internet mob. “My family’s been terrorized, threatened, and harassed,” Victoria Ingalls, the mother of the mistakenly identified Matthew Ingalls, told me. "We just really want to be left alone.”"

Megan Basham on X - "Re: the “Cornell 7”—There are two realities. Every decent person‘s heart should break for that girl. Because no woman who is healthy and feels cared for behaves like that. And we live in a time of wolves that will pick off weak prey. But at the same time, we have to be honest that there is significant doubt about whether a crime was committed here. And we need to use incidents like this to explain why consent culture is so very insufficient as a sexual moral code."

John Moody 🇺🇬 on X - "It's almost like the Cornell 7 story proves every warning many have given for years about why... sending young girls off to college, apart from their fathers and outside his protection and authority... and it's not that much better either for men, especially if the college is a mixed sex environment. Colleges have become not just a massive, waste of time and money, but dens of debauchery and stupidity. The fact that conservatives still send their children off to them en masse shows how lazy and stupid the vast majority have become. #closethemdown"

andieiam on X - "The so-called Cornell rape victim was not gang-*****. Three of the men didn't even touch her. She willingly consented to sex with the other four at different times"
temu temüjin 🐴 on X - "This is the insane thing about the “Cornell 7”. Imagine being one of three guys who didn’t even touch her and insane feminists are ruining your life two years later saying you gang raped her. Meanwhile in Europe, immigrants actually are systematically grooming, drugging, and gang raping teenage girls, and they will call you racist for bringing that up as an issue"

shoe on X - "women can never be held accountable for their actions. from murdering 3 children in cold blood to ketamine gangbangs. they are just helpless innocent babes in the woods, perpetual victims of the universe. the only crime they can truly commit is being attractive in a sports ad"
Post-Left Watch (postleftwatch.bsky.social) on X - "Shoe0nhead attacks the Cornell 7 rape survivor and somehow turns it into a defense of Sydney Sweeney. What a vile person."
Men who disagree with the feminist narrative are rapists and women who disagree are vile. You're not allowed to disagree with the feminist narrative

Emily Saves America on X - "I’m genuinely confused about the standard here. If a woman and a man both voluntarily get drunk or take drugs and then have sex, why is his intoxication treated differently from hers when determining consent? Either intoxication affects someone’s capacity to consent or it doesn’t. So what exactly is the legal standard, and is it applied equally to both sexes? And if consent given at the time can simply be taken back months or years later, then what weight does consent at the time actually hold?"

OutspokenSamantha on X - "If the Cornell 7 had been a group of illegal immigrants, and the sexual assault had been reported to ICE instead of a University - white liberal women would be completely silent right now."
Captain_Sarcastic on X - "No, they would be wearing pink in solidarity and blocking ICE vehicles"

chiller_sry on X - "Can I also say like, the whole “men & women are different, women are ruined by casual sex” line echos the shaming that by all accounts, led Jane Doe to fabricate rape allegations in the 1st place? Can u morons step off judging ppl’s personal choices in their personal lives"
Jeremy on X - "The horseshoe leading to women being infants incapable of thought is becoming a multi-headed hydra."

shoe on X - "since jane doe reported giving ongoing consent the entire night including saying “no” to some things she didnt want (anal/4somes & the guys respected that) in order to make this a legitimate rape case the gov of NY is trying to move the goalposts & change the law to say people cannot legally consent to sex if they've had 1 drink"
Def Noodles on X - "That call ABC dropped today, where Ingalls says Train Doe arrived sober and agreed to the threesome while sober, may change things a bit."

YinkaThatGuy on X - "The Cornell 7 discourse is feminism in one screenshot: “Women have agency!” Until the story gets messy. Then suddenly accountability becomes misogyny. Empowered when it looks good. Infantilised when it doesn’t."

Peachy Keenan on X - "This case is insane.
- Two had zero contact with her (white)
- One accused of kissing her (Latino)
- One oral sex (Asian)
- Three had intercourse (1 black, who is also accused of hitting her and bruising her), 1 Latino, 1 indeterminate)
What is Letitia gonna do?
The black kid is also the one who wrote the lewd messages on the group chat encouraging other boys to go see. Seriously, what is Letitia going to do? Is BLM going to intervene?"

Brianna Lyman on X - "Everyone is Jane Doe but no one was Laken Riley Everyone is Jane Doe but no one was Iryna Zarutska"

temu temüjin 🐴 on X - "The thing is, this defense is completely airtight because Cornell girl somehow gave us 7 counterexamples and 5 thought experiments like
“well what if she revokes consent from a guy who already had it, oh, she did that and he listened.”
“Okay well what if she told a really rude pushy guy he can’t have sex with her. Oh she did that, and he listened.”
“Well what if she told them outright she’s tired and wants to stop now. Oh she did that and they stopped. Damn.”
To round it off, they even included a diverse cast of characters from all the races of man of every imaginable stock and breed. including a Korean man which is quite progressive because they’re usually not included in this sort of thing
This is like something that could be used as a thought experiment to explain how something ISNT rape
This is almost a case study in how to “technically not rape someone”"

Richard Hanania on X - "“Any of our daughters could be Jane Doe” I can’t imagine a father being familiar with the details of this case and then writing something like that."
If any American girl could be Jane Doe, that speaks volumes about modern American girls. Ditto for how so many women are claiming that they are Jane Doe

Brother Lunk on X - "The Snapchat message is a nothing-burger. It was sent at 1:42 AM. By that point, two of the three threesomes had already happened, involving three different men (Ingalls, Newell, Lopes). After that point, four additional men entered the room over the course of the night. Two of them (Norris, Kretzschmar) never even touched her; according to them, they were alarmed by the snapchat message and came to see what was going on, but were reassured when they saw that she was lucid and everything happening was consensual. One of them (Sarabia) tried to kiss her, she rebuffed him, and he did nothing further (not rape). One (Lee) took part in the final threesome of the night, which ended as soon as she said she was tired and wanted to go to sleep (not rape). If the snapchat message were an invitation to commit rape (rather than an advertisement that a woman is available for free sex), then you would expect some indication that any of the four men who entered the room after seeing it did so with an intent to rape. But there's no evidence any of them did."

Richard Hanania on X - "There's a recurring pattern in these campus rape cases
1) Woman has sexual encounter
2) Accuses a man of rape, politicians and institutions run with the initial details
3) Facts blow apart the narrative
We have an epidemic of sex regret among women. A few decide to go from sluts to victims by reframing their experiences as rape. We still haven't figured out how to handle sexual freedom."

Dave Gilbert | Facebook - "We now know that the woman involved at first did not see herself as a victim. Jane Doe, as the NYT calls her, was then slut shamed, which caused her increasing distress. At one point, she found a forum post in which the incident was characterized as a “gang r*ape.” She couldn’t believe it was described that way, and confided in Matthew Ingalls, one of the men who she would later accuse of assault. One week after she was supposedly raped at a frat house, the woman was upset because she was disinvited from a party at the same location “for her own good.” Days later, she started describing her experience as non-consensual. We’ve been doing this campus rape controversy thing for decades now, and these conversations never get anywhere because they only reveal that we are in denial about human nature. Women have been told that consent is what matters in sexual relationships. Of course, “consent” sometimes exists on a spectrum, particularly when it comes to sex, an area of life where humans communicate more subtly than they do elsewhere. Little explicit guidance is given beyond that. Men, we all know, want to have a lot of sex with a wide variety of sexual partners. Movies, TV shows, and feminism tell us that women can legitimately decide to behave the same way, and that this is either morally neutral or empowering. [...] Most girls who go to elite universities are not that promiscuous. They understand that everyone is supposed to say that men and women should be judged equally, but also that nobody lives that advice. Educated American women generally do not have group sex with random men. And if there are times when they do behave like sluts, they try to keep such behavior secret rather than proudly owning it like actresses do in the movies. The sexual double standard rests on certain fundamentals about human nature. Men who were promiscuous had an evolutionary advantage, while a woman who wasn’t selective about her partners was at risk of ending up with bad genes for her offspring or being abandoned in a vulnerable state. I’m not failing to make the is/ought distinction here. It is true that simply having an evolutionary explanation for some aspect of human nature doesn’t morally justify it. Nonetheless, the fact that men and women are psychologically different must be taken as a fact about the world. The double standards aren’t just a matter of judging other people, but determine how we judge ourselves too. If women did not evolve to have casual sex, then casual sex is probably going to cause psychological distress. Morning after regret is a woman’s body telling her that she did something wrong, and the social stigma that comes from such acts is no less a part of human nature. How we feel about the behavior of others is not infinitely malleable through rational discourse. Note that we are talking about an Ivy League university in the fall of 2024. Even in such an environment, a woman was slut shamed to such a degree that it led to her dropping out of college and ruined her life. If Ivy League universities cannot eliminate slut shaming after decades of feminist ideological domination, what hope do the rest of us have? Civilized countries should be applauded for no longer arresting those who have sex outside marriage or stoning them to death. But to go beyond this and say that we should not judge promiscuous women harshly is asking too much of human nature. Every other society has found it easier to just encourage women to practice modesty and discretion. We’ve decided to try something else, and the result is endless moral panics and controversies over fuzzy concepts like consent, sexual assault, and power imbalances. The Cornell student is a victim. Likely not of rape, but of lies about human nature. Here’s what women need to be told. You have a choice to behave promiscuously. We’re a civilized society and believe in individual liberty. But if you do have sex with men you don’t know well and are not in a committed relationship with, you will likely regret your actions. Other women will gossip about you, and even the men who you’d think would be grateful will often dehumanize you, laugh at you behind your back and see you with contempt. I know you’ve seen a lot of TV shows where the most attractive, confident, and high status women go through life sexually free and open without suffering much in the way of emotional distress and reputational consequences, and there is probably some minority of women for whom that is possible, but the odds are extremely low that you are one of them. This will be true whether you’re a waitress at a restaurant or an elite college student, even though in the latter case you’ll be subject to a lot more propaganda on this topic. We are in the process of relearning what nearly every other society has understood instinctively. Unfortunately, our unwillingness to take human nature seriously enough is creating a lot of broken women and punishing too many innocent men along the way."

Richard “Beebo” Russell on X - "It’s kinda frying me that the gangbang chick not not getting invited to the Halloween party is going to end up being the Archduke Ferdinand of the fall of women’s rights."

Meme - Huge black eyed soyjak: "I want the Cornell 7 locked up for life. But I would NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER NEVER deport an illegal accused of the same thing"
Left wingers just hate "white" people and the West

El Hamsterrifico on X - "It’s funny how “my body my choice” works.
-She chose to do drugs and alcohol
-She chose to snort ketamine
-She chose to partake in a threesome
But the 7 dudes from Cornell are made responsible for all of it. It’s always their choice until it’s time to face the consequences."

Meme - Just Mindy 🐊 @just_mindy: "again, this shows people don’t read the interviews. Several of the guys who went in the room and did nothing to the girl, said they went to check and ensure she was ok. She was happy and consenting so they left. You think it’s up to one frat member to go “shut down” a consensual sex act between adults? How does that look? Also, guy 3 did shut it down and kicked everyone out of his room. He’s still being sued."
Caitlin Flanagan @CaitlinPacific: "https://thefp.com/p/caitlin-flan agan-jane-doe-frat-parties-cornell All I know that a fraternity brother sent a text advertising “free” sex, and there wasn’t one member of the club who was man enough to shut it down."
Readers added context: "Jane Doe's November 2024 sworn statement to Cornell police states that two men entered the room and said they were shutting down whatever the f this is while men were doing drugs off her body."
Left wingers keep claiming that 57 people raped her, because they think just because you're in a group chat means you must have been called like a zombie by the advertisement of free pussy to rape. They also claim no one did anything to stop what was happening, because they don't care about facts

Meme - NPC: "What right-wing misogynistic garbage taught you to not believe all women and instead wait for evidence in court?"
Normal person: "To Kill a Mockingbird"
NPC:
*Upset NPC*

Richard Hanania on X - "This is the best thing I’ve read on the Cornell situation. We focus completely on consent, and that makes sense as a legal standard. But morally, it’s only part of the equation. If a man technically meets whatever standards we set for consent and then treats a woman like garbage afterwards, that’s terrible behavior and should be condemned. It’ll be hard to convince a jury that any of the Cornell 7 committed rape. But these were men who sought to humiliate women for pleasure and as a group bonding experience. This is how women can later feel regret over sexual experiences, and they use the language of “rape” because it is the only thing that we acknowledge as strong enough to capture their emotional state. I haven’t always appreciated this enough when looking at questionable allegations. Consent should be the legal standard. But men need to behave better, and it is good to shun those who treat women poorly."
Naxelas on X - "My concern is that words like "rape", "genocide", and others are increasingly used as moral commands, not descriptions of an act. They dictate to the listener "we have decided this is wrong, you must stand with us in solidarity". There's intentionally no room for discussion."
Of course women are always innocent victims and have no agency and are incapable of consenting to unconventional sexual acts

Nick Sortor on X - "🚨 NOW: “Protestors” are at Cornell University screaming “NO JUSTICE, NO PEACE” after a woman changed her story 5 times and decided she got “r-ped” Be careful of any “women” in this crowd, gents. You could EASILY be the next victim of false r-pe accusations."
John Ziegler on X - "Just to be VERY clear, if the news media didn’t become the PR firm of what was just the filing of a damn lawsuit, and fan the flames of a moral panic, this protest, which is absolutely going to impact events (very much on the side of IN-justice) never happens, and the legal system is allowed to at least try to function as intended. Plaintiffs lawyers have figured out how to play the news media like a fiddle, and we are ALL paying for it in numerous ways, whether we even realize it or not. 😡🤦‍♂️🤮"

Dvorstone on X - "I hate going into the details of this case but this is worth understanding because the entire internet seems to be ignoring or denying that this entire thing was predicated on the psychological exploit of women's romantic attachments. The woman in question had a romantic/sexual interest with guy #1. He invited her over and she came. He then proposed a threesome with guy#2, which she thought meant that the two men would engage in gay sex with each other, and her. She agreed. Later, guy #2 makes out with her but her interest is described as minimal. #2 is the "black guy" and that's who slapped her butt and "commanded" her to snort ketamine off of his dick. Guy #3 enters (it's his room) and they end up in another threesome with him and #2. Later, more men entered (7 total) and she declined additional sexual behavior. Later again, guy #1 wanted to do it again with her but now with #4. She is on recorded as having said "what about just you and me?" to guy #1. Text messages confirm that he was her primary interest. The entire thing is a repulsive disaster but the clearest assessment is this:
1. Guy #1 used her, taking advantage of her drunkenness and her romantic interest in him.
2. Guys #2, #3, and #4 took advantage of the opportunity that #1 provided them.
3. Later, guy #1 then scorned her and then someone exposed what happened, thus ruining her reputation.
4. Feeling taken advantage of, she lashed out in the traditional manner: she accused all 7 men of rape.
Did the woman in question engage in slutty behavior? Yes she did. A central problem today is that modern sexual morality encourages this from all women. This is what women are taught to be today. Women will get angry at this but... most women are temperamentally agreeable and conflict avoidant. This woman CLEARLY engaged in a bunch of stuff that she was uneasy about simply to be agreeable. If you know anything about women at all, you know how true it is that women will do things just to be agreeable. The concept of "consent," as men understand it, does not apply to about 85% of women. They'll simply go along to make people happy or keep the peace. Modern men do not understand this. What does a woman want? Most of the time, it's to keep the peace or to make someone happy. She does "x" act for THAT purpose, NOT because she wants to do that act. That's what happened here. This woman wanted to please guy #1, and he took advantage of that. Everyone else involved is a creep but he's a villain. She became a villain when she lashed out at everyone. Men deny this and claim "women have no agency" or blah, blah, but the truth is that women are simply anchored to the man they're attracted to. If you want to know who a woman is attracted to, simply pay attention to her interests, values, hobbies, and so on, and relate that to the men in her life. If she's dedicated to work, then it's probably someone at her company. If it's running, then it's probably someone at the gym. Everything that happened to her happened because she didn't want to upset or displease the man that she had interest in. He wanted a porn experience and she gave it to him. Then he threw her away instead of appreciating what she did. Men will think "why would a man want to be in a relationship with a slut?" What they don't understand is that her being a "slut" was for him. This is exactly how "pimps" turn a woman out. Most prostitutes are "turned out" by a man that they imagine themselves in a relationship with. They're whoring for him. This is the central psychological exploit of women: the more romantic interest they have in a man, the more they're willing to do for him. Modern men are taking advantage of this exploit for casual sex and "porn fantasies."
It's true that women wanted equality and if that is so, they need to be held to the same standard as men. The problem is that women CAN'T be held to that standard justly. It's impossible. The reason is because women's sense of morality is dependent upon two things
1. The consensus/approval of the herd
2. The approval of their romantic interest
If a woman loves you enough, that'll override even the power of #1. This is what a LOT of men don't understand. If a woman loves you enough, she won't care what anyone else thinks. Modern men deny this because either no woman's ever loved them enough to behave like that OR they did but the man wasted it on something stupid like a threesome. A woman who loves a man is a powerful force. She'll do anything for him. Use that wisely and it'll make your life. Waste it, and you might never get another chance. I'm not saying that this woman "loved" guy #1. I'm saying that she liked him enough to sexually debase herself for him. This is what most BDSM relationships are (women doing increasingly extreme things to please a man). It's common behavior. He then failed to appreciate that and scorned her. And THAT is why so many women are upset. It's not "rape." It's betrayal. It's what men call "regret." This is why you're not supposed to "kiss and tell." It's a betrayal. A woman who did "those things" did them for you. The woman in question was a fool. Then, in her anger, she lashed out and made herself a villain too. Guy #1 (Matthew Ingalls) IS a villain though. He's not a rapist, but he is a villain. A lot of men deny this concept: every woman is a "slut" if she thinks so will please the man she loves. She'll get a boob job or lose weight or do that kinky thing you like. The reason men deny this is because no woman has acted this way for them. "Hating the slut" is spiritually Islamic. It imagines women as corruptors. Such women do exist but most "sluts" today are so because they think it's what the men they're interested in want because that IS what the men keep telling women they want. Women are trash today because you asked for that. Blaming them for it while absolving yourself of responsibility is, again, spiritually Islamic."

✌🏼Honey Bomb 🌻 on X - "Seven names. One signed statement. Almost nobody read it. Rape is a crime, and any man who commits rape should be charged and punished, but that doesn’t turn an accusation into a verdict. Her November 2024 statement is public. She signed it, corrected it by hand, and the DA declined to charge because, on her own account, the sex and the drugs were voluntary, and when she said stop, it stopped. Innocent until proven guilty is not a favor to men. It is the standard that makes a guilty verdict mean something, which is the only reason a real victim gets believed. Regret is not rape, and a false accusation does not protect women. It teaches everyone to doubt the next one who is telling the truth. Read the statement, then talk. https://tompkinscountyny.gov/files/assets/c"
✌🏼Honey Bomb 🌻 on X - "On November 14 she told Cornell police, “I can say with 100 percent confidence I was raped.” That interview was not sworn. Lying in it carried no penalty. The next day they handed her a written statement. She corrected it by hand. Then she signed it under New York Penal Law 210.45. A false written statement is a crime. That is the statement the DA has. It does not say she was raped. It says she agreed, and that they stopped when she said stop. She had the line on November 14. She did NOT put it on the page she signed on November 15, once a false statement could get her charged. Sit with that."

temu temüjin 🐴 on X - "Let’s recap:
- agrees to threesome and is excited (her own statement to the police) by the idea after a few drinks
- one of the guys is so drunk he passes out and loses his erection, the only person who was stated to have “passed out” btw
- she asks to stop so the passed out guy can recover, agrees to do ketamine with the guy still standing
- does ketamine directly off the erect cock of the guy who didn’t pass out
- can’t remember how she ended up having sex with more guys but doesn’t ever claim she passed out, and remember up until this point she’s been drinking and doing K and engaging in group sex voluntarily, so there’s no reason to assume she was opposed to more men, she just can’t remember all the details because of the drugs she did voluntarily
- the second she’s too tired and wants it to stop she asks them to stop and it all stops and it’s over
Women are not actually getting these details and when they do they’re ignoring them so they can call you a rapist
If they actually knew this girl in their social circles they would all call her a whore behind her back. Women are terrible people, awful hypocrites, and there is no point in explaining any of this to them because they don’t care about the truth, they want to look virtuous for standing up for the girl, feel morally superior for secretly looking down on her for being a whore, and then brow beat all the men who care about the pesky facts by saying they’re sexist and probably also rapists
This is the situation summed up Ignore the women, share the facts"

Kevin Bass on X - "The hysteria by women over Jane Doe isn't about rape. Just as with the Lindsay Clancy case, they just want power. Power to murder children. Power to destroy men on a whim. They want women to be a privileged class with the power to do unlimited harm and injustice to others."
J.D. Haltigan, PhD 🏒👨‍💻 on X: - "They can't bear the inevitability of patriarchy, so they resort to the behaviors you describe. This is the truth."

BREAKING: Cornell activists trash admin. building in solidarity with alleged rape victim - "At around 3 a.m. early this morning, Cornell University activists angry at the alleged rape of a student by members of a fraternity trashed the school’s main administrative building via smashed windows and red spray-painted messages. The Cornell Daily Sun reports the Day Hall graffiti read “SMASH THE PATRIARCHY” and “AT CORNELL RAPISTS ARE PROTECTED PROTESTORS ARE EXPELLED,” while “shards” of broken glass from destroyed windows “litter[ed] the entryway and the floor” of the entrance... In a statement to the Sun, the activists behind the vandalism wrote they were “motivated by both the lawsuit” and “the global systems of power that allowed this to happen in the first place.” They defended their actions as “nonviolent”: “We reject the dogma that would condemn our actions this morning as violent while excusing rape. Property damage is not violent; condoning rape is.” The activists further noted they wanted “to ensure” that Day Hall “was not able to continue business as usual.”... The activists’ manifesto called out President Kotlikoff and other university officials for “condoning rape,” “cultivating […] a culture that emboldens rapists in their actions,” and “suspending nonviolent protestors” who had demonstrated against the “genocide” in Gaza. It concluded by demanding Cornell officials “resign and turn power over to the students and the workers, the people who truly care about this campus and want nothing but justice and liberation for themselves and their peers.”"
Violence that left wingers support is speech. Speech that left wingers hate is violence
The left wing agenda is all connected

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Latest posts (which you might not see on this page)

powered by Blogger | WordPress by Newwpthemes