Links - 4th November 2026 (2 - Migrants: Canada)

Dei Civitas on X - "Canada is no longer a people
In his well-known work The City of God (Civitas Dei), the fifth-century philosopher and pastor Augustine of Hippo gave a clear definition of what holds a nation together... he argued that a people is not defined by geography or blood, but by a multitude of rational beings united by a common agreement on the objects of their love. Canada no longer meets this definition. The country has abandoned the higher values that once bound it together and has allowed its citizens to be divided into competing and mutually exclusive value systems. This is not accidental. The shift from higher to lower values at the top is being reinforced by the deliberate fragmentation of the citizenry below, all in service of greater state power
I. The Top-Down Force: The Abandonment of Higher Values
Augustine used the term libido dominandi, the lust for mastery, to describe what happens when rulers abandon higher moral principles. Once leaders no longer serve a higher good, they begin to seek power for its own sake. Canada’s Constitution opens by recognizing the supremacy of God and the rule of law. These are higher values rooted in the Christian tradition that once shaped Canadian society. Yet in recent years, those in power have steadily replaced these principles with the raw pursuit of control. The invocation of the Emergencies Act in 2022 to freeze the bank accounts of peaceful protesters without court orders was a clear demonstration of executive power overriding established law. Bills C-11 and C-18, sold as cultural protection, function in practice as tools for the state to regulate speech and digital content. These moves reflect a deeper shift. The higher values of God and law have been set aside in favor of the lower value of maintaining and expanding raw power.
II. The Bottom-Up Force: The Destruction of Unity Through Competing Value Systems
Augustine was clear that a people requires not only higher values, but unity in those values. When citizens no longer agree on the same basic objects of love, the society ceases to be a coherent people and becomes a collection of competing factions. Canada is now experiencing this breakdown on a massive scale. In recent years, Canada has admitted over 400,000 permanent residents annually while also maintaining more than 2.6 million temporary residents. In 2025 alone, more than 2.1 million temporary resident permits expired, with another 1.8 million set to expire in 2026. Large numbers of those whose permits have expired have simply remained in the country rather than leaving. At the same time, there has been little serious effort to integrate newcomers, whether permanent or temporary, into a shared set of Canadian principles. The result is the creation of many competing and mutually exclusive value systems within the same borders.. Instead of one national culture with common moral foundations, Canada now contains parallel societies with fundamentally different views on gender, religion, free speech, individual rights, the value of human life, and the role of the state. Polling from the Angus Reid Institute and Environics consistently shows declining national identity and rising identification with ethnic or religious subgroups. When that common agreement breaks down, the nation stops being a single body and becomes a collection of tribes.
III. The Synthesis: Fragmentation in Service of Power
These two forces, the abandonment of higher values at the top and the fragmentation of values at the bottom, are not separate problems. They reinforce each other. By abandoning the higher Christian-influenced principles of the Constitution in favor of the libido dominandi, the managerial class has created a system that requires greater coercion to hold together. At the same time, by flooding the country with competing value systems through unchecked immigration and large numbers of temporary residents who remain after their permits expire, it has deliberately weakened the social cohesion that would allow citizens to resist that coercion. A divided population is far easier to manage than a united one. This is the classic pattern of the earthly city in its most disordered form: rulers driven by the lust for power and a people stripped of any common higher love that could bind them together. As Canada moves further from its constitutional foundations and deeper into value fragmentation, it is transforming from a nation united by shared principles into a population managed through division and control."

Wiretap Media on X - "💥EXPLOSIVE ATIP: Immigration Canada knew Indian agents were running MASSIVE FRAUD in the trucking industry and the student visa program as early as 2017 — and stamped the evidence "DO NOT DISCLOSE."  According to records released under the Access to Information Act, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) maintained an internal procedures manual for its New Delhi visa office documenting systemic fraud across the student visa and temporary foreign worker streams. The manual instructs officers to treat fraud as anticipated rather than exceptional  The most damning thing about this scandal is not the fraud — it's that the government predicted it, kept it running, and then stamped the file "DO NOT DISCLOSE."  Canada didn't lose control of its immigration system—they monetized it."

Massive influx of immigrant workers needed in Canada: Diplomat | Toronto Sun - "As almost 300 mostly unidentified Canadians attend a trade mission in Mumbai, the High Commissioner of India to Canada predicts that this country will need 15 million immigrants to meet the workforce needs of a growing economy in the next 10 years. “This is a new Canada and we are anticipating that things will happen fast. And Prime Minister (Mark) Carney, given his background as the governor of two banks, Bank of Canada, Bank of England, as well as Brookfield, his experience with investment with the economy, there is a lot of trust that he will be able to deliver on a lot of the things,” Dinesh Patnaik said in an interview on CPAC.  Did India’s representative in Canada let the cat out of the bag regarding the country’s future? What else is in the bag?... “Canada understands this, Prime Minister Carney’s team understands this, so we’re working together to work out a talented innovation” to “get the best of talent best of people to come study work and contribute,” he added... The prime minister’s office has not yet responded regarding Patnaik’s comments. But what was said on this program would fundamentally change Canada and potentially double the population by 2036.  Whatever you think of it, none of this is something Canadians have voted for, let alone have been consulted on. Most have never heard of the need for 15 million new workers, or that there is a trade trip in India where such discussions could be happening...  I have asked both the federal and provincial government for a transparent list of Canadian individuals, business and government officials involved, but have not so far been forwarded this information... While I take a skeptics’ perspective on trade delegations, and big talk about creating 15 million jobs, or the New World Order, that is partially because I have seen government previously bring in thousands on special visas to take minimum-wage fast food jobs or attend private colleges — none of which helps Indians enjoy the Canadian dream or fix Canada’s current economic woes as a result of the trade war with the United States, or solidify replacing that market.  But even if you are prepared to accept the narrative, if these largely anonymous participants are talking about the future of Canada and its resources in India, the average Canadian should be in on this conversation and get a vote on whether they want the country’s population to double."

Wiretap Media on X - "💥MAJOR BREAKING: Ottawa scrapped the only rule that required employers to hire Canadians first.   Buried in paragraph two of an IRCC release, employers no longer have to advertise a job, prove no qualified Canadian applied, or pay $1,000 for an LMIA — for a high-wage job offer to count toward permanent residence.  The Labour Market test is gone from the PR route, and verification moves out of ESDC, whose mandate is protecting Canadian workers, and into IRCC, whose mandate is selecting immigrants.  Still think the great replacement is a conspiracy?"

Canadians moving to US in record numbers, immigration up 142% | National Post - "Drawing from recent data released by the White House that show immigration to the U.S. has fallen from almost every country except Canada, the non-profit civic group Build Canada is sounding the alarm on a potential brain drain from this country into the United States.  A social media post from Rapid Response 47, a White House account launched last year, shows legal immigration down this year from almost every corner of the Earth. Drop-off ranges from 16 per cent in Western Europe and 17 per cent in Southeast Asia to 89 per cent in central Africa and 99 per cent in central Asia... Pulling data from Statistics Canada and elsewhere, the group notes that 120,640 people left Canada last year, the highest number since records began in 1952. It adds that 34 per cent of immigrants with PhDs leave Canada within 25 years, compared to just 16 per cent of high school grads — the so-called “leaky bucket” problem. It also found that tech workers typically make 46 per cent more in the U.S. than in Canada. The group warned that fewer rivals for U.S. green cards from the rest of the world will continue to make it easier for Canadians to head south, and that “those who go are mostly highly skilled and well paid.”  Lucy Hargreaves, co-founder and CEO of Build Canada, said in an interview that such numbers represent a serious problem. “It is this cohort of highly talented, highly educated Canadians who have the potential to be top earners who are going to the U.S. to work in high-growth industries, especially software grads, but also other professional services,” she said... Hargreaves noted that salaries are generally higher in the U.S., while capital gains taxes are more lax. “Our income tax structure is also, generally speaking, quite uncompetitive with many states,” she said. “The tax brackets for top income earners kick in at a much lower income in Canada than they do in the U.S. And cost of living in major Canadian cities is incredibly expensive.”...  But the problem also offers a solution. A recent paper by Build Canada notes: “There are ample levers to be used to tackle this issue that remain un-deployed.”  The paper lists “bold policy choices” that include forgiveness of student loans, income-tax reform (or a deduction for specific high-demand jobs) and a five-year “founder’s tax break” for founders of newly incorporated Canadian-controlled private corporations."
Weird. I thought no one wants to go to that hellhole, and Carney was saving the country
Time to "tax the 'rich'" and make them pay their "fair share"

Meme - The Watcher @topshabbosgroy: "Remember when Don Cherry got fired for saying immigrants don't love this country, then 5 years later immigrants are chanting death to Canada and protesting?"
"I tried to warn you"

Meme - Justin Trudeau @JustinTrudeau: "Last year, Canada welcomed more than 405,000 newcomers the most we've ever welcomed in one year. We're building on that and setting higher targets in the years ahead, because immigration is critical to growing our economy and helping businesses find the workers they need."
Justin Trudeau @JustinTrudeau: "We're going to significantly reduce the number of immigrants coming to Canada for the next two years. This is temporary - to pause our population growth and let our economy catch up. We have to get the system working right for all Canadians."

Immigration is higher than Ottawa has been telling us | National Post - "In the same week Ottawa revealed that immigration numbers weren’t contracting nearly as much as they’d said, Prime Minister Mark Carney mused about raising them back to never-before-seen highs.  Earlier this year, Government of Canada figures showed that, for the first time, Canada’s population had contracted over the course of a calendar year. In 2025, according to those estimates, the Canadian population had gone down by about 102,000. Then, earlier this month, Statistics Canada revised the figures and reported that Canada was actually still adding people by the hundreds of thousands.  According to the revised estimates, instead of going down by 102,000, the Canadian population in 2025 actually went up by 280,000.  Only a few days later, on Sept. 27, the New York Times published a lengthy interview with Carney in which he pledged to eventually “resume some controlled increase in the population, which is the nature of Canada.”  “So that will happen, and we just want to make sure that we’ve got it under control,” he said... Even if 2025 had indeed been a year of population contraction, even that statistic would have only been possible because Canada was coming off the most dramatic migration surge in its history.  In just three years between 2022 and 2025, the Canadian population surged from 38,559,788 to 41,435,888 – an increase of 2.8 million.  Put another way, at the beginning of 2025, roughly one in every 16 people in Canada had arrived in the country within the last three years... Canada doesn’t actually have any reliable figures on whether temporary migrants are leaving the country at the expiry of their visa.  At a House of Commons hearing earlier this year, a Tory critic asked Immigration Minister Lena Diab why Canada wasn’t tracking migrant exits, prompting Diab to call it a “good question.”  “I wondered the same thing, but that’s how Canada has been throughout its history,” she replied, before saying Ottawa was working on a pilot program to do just that.  All the while, the rate of asylum-seekers living in Canada continues to reach all-time highs.  In his New York Times interview, Carney said that asylum-seekers “are down by one-third on a flow basis.”  But here again, the reduction is only coming after a meteoric surge in the category, while the net number of asylum-seekers in the country is officially larger than the population of Halifax.  According to the most recent Government of Canada figures, there are 530,000 foreign nationals living in Canada as asylum claimants. This is up 50,000 from when Carney first took office in April 2025.  It’s also more than three times higher than the 160,000 asylum-seekers counted as recently as 2022.  As noted in an analysis by Better Dwelling, Statistics Canada’s revised population estimates don’t just mean that there are 382,000 more people in the country than expected.  It also means that several other indicators are slightly worse, including unemployment and GDP per capita.  According to Better Dwelling, the population revision means that the latest unemployment rate, officially estimated at 6.7 per cent, is probably closer to 7.6 per cent. “That would make it the third-highest report since the pandemic,” it read."

EDITORIAL: Higher immigration is a looming disaster | Toronto Sun - "Based on their record, Canadians should get very nervous whenever the federal Liberals start talking about increasing Canada’s immigration levels, again. Particularly so when Prime Minister Mark Carney casually signals the Liberals are about to do it not in Parliament, but in an interview with the New York Times.  Back when he was running for Liberal leader, Carney said excessive immigration under his predecessor, Justin Trudeau, was one of the reasons the Canadian economy was in bad shape before U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff war... Let’s review how we got here.  In 2022, the Trudeau government proudly announced it was dramatically hiking Canada’s immigration targets from 405,000 permanent residents annually — which at the time was a record high — to 465,000 in 2023, 485,000 in 2024 and 500,000 starting in 2025 and continuing at that level in subsequent years.  Just two years later, having ignored warnings even from their own experts that their high immigration levels were contributing to Canada’s housing crisis and putting strain on the country’s already beleaguered health care system, Trudeau and Co. finally admitted they had made a mistake.  By then, polls showed most Canadians believed the immigration targets were too high, while the Liberals attributed criticism of their policies to racism, before they finally did an about face and lowered their immigration targets."

Chris Ryan on X - "📣 Carney: “Immigration is under control… now let’s increase it again.” 🇨🇦 🇮🇳
Meanwhile:
• Homes are unaffordable
• Hospitals are overwhelmed
• Youth unemployment is rising
• Temporary residents still sit at 2.8 million
 This isn’t sustainable. It’s deliberate. Canadians first or we keep losing the country we served. #cdnpoli #CanadaFirst"
Proof that there is no point in voting for PP because he'll increase immigration (too)!

Feds left municipalities in the dark on immigration: Big City Mayors - "many mayors were frustrated with the provincial and federal governments over a lack of assistance in dealing with their respective cities’ homelessness crises, an increase in asylum seekers, and a surge in immigration caused by federal Liberal policies. The chat logs start on July 15, 2023, with representatives from Guelph asking other cities and their mayors whether they were also experiencing overwhelmed social services and a surge in refugees entering their cities.  Others discussed conversations with the then-Immigration Minister Sean Fraser, who allegedly indicated that there would be no additional assistance to deal with the influx caused by the feds' immigration and refugee policies beyond the “existing Federal dollars and programs in the medium term.” One representative from Niagara said that the surge in refugees into Niagara has been “putting strain on our already full shelters for the last several months.” Mayors, including Ajax Mayor Shaun Collier, acknowledged that many of Ontario’s “big cities” were experiencing capacity issues with the “recent flood of asylum seekers” that had been brought into their cities.  “Ajax has had over 200 in the last 2 weeks. Regional resources are exhausted. Of our 200, approx half are documented and in the system so the Feds have or are supposed to have provided funding for them,” Collier said in one message.  Collier also noted that social services to support and house the new refugee claimants had now been made the region’s responsibility. Mayors and city representatives discussed homeless encampments, addictions and public disorder as well. A common theme among many mayors was that the provincial and federal governments weren’t doing enough to help cities address the issues.  Oakville Mayor Rob Burton was particularly critical of the Liberal government's immigration and refugee intake policies, noting that mass immigration “broke the housing market” by increasing demand that municipalities were not prepared for.  “Ottawa broke the housing market with an unsustainable and unpredicted and unprepared for increase in demand from their massive increase in immigration,” Burton said in 2024. Hamilton Mayor and former NDP Leader Andrea Horwath, on the other hand, responded that immigration was needed but that the federal and provincial governments failed to account for where all of those “needed” immigrants would live.  Waterloo Mayor Dorothy McCabe even complained that municipalities were not adequately consulted about immigration and refugee targets before the federal government set immigration policy.  McCabe complained about Ukrainians arriving to study in Waterloo and discovering they did not qualify as refugees for purposes affecting tuition. She called the situation “untenable.”  “The federal government needs to start talking to municipalities before they set their immigration and refugee targets”"
Virtue signalling is fun and games when you can dump the costs on others

Nana0000 on X - "Doug Ford called letters telling temporary workers to leave “the craziest thing I have ever heard,” and a drop of about 50,000 people “dangerous.” The word on the permit is temporary. He is treating the exit date as an attack. Ontario was 15.16 million people on July 1, 2022. It was 16.26 million on July 1, 2026. That is 1.1 million added in four years. In 2022–23 the province took 463,000. In 2023–24 it took 472,000. About 3 percent a year, almost all immigration and temporary residents, not births. Through that boom, real GDP per person fell about 1 percent. Youth unemployment is 12.9 percent, against a pre-pandemic average of 10.8 percent. Ontario’s jobless rate sits above the national rate. Toronto’s price-to-income ratio is still near double digits. His own labour minister refused Ottawa’s offer to lift the rural low-wage temporary-foreign-worker cap, and cited youth unemployment. An audit of the nominee program found fewer than half of skilled-trades applicants were still in the trade. Streams were shut for fraud. Then the premier went on camera and defended the headcount. Canada does not reliably record whether a temporary resident leaves when the permit ends. Exit data are incomplete. Expired permits are not the same as confirmed departures. A program that cannot say who went home is not a temporary program. It is an open door with a label. A decline of 50,000 after a gain of more than a million is not a danger to the country. It is the first time the fine print has been read. Grandchildren do not inherit a press release. They inherit the rent, the wage, and the queue. Put the people who already live here first. Temporary means a date to go home."

wealthmoose on X - "🇨🇦 IRCC confirmed they cannot locate 2 million expired visa holders.  CBSA says they don’t have resources to find them.  Canada’s immigration minister called it under control.  2 million people. Untracked. In a country of 40 million.  That’s not a resource problem. That’s a system that was never designed to enforce its own rules.👇"

Wiretap Media on X - "💥REPORT: New ATIPs reveal Harjit Sajjan prioritized Afghan Sikhs in Kabul’s final hours while Canadians and interpreters were abandoned. 🧵Full story in the thread:"

Meme - Riley Donovan @valdombre: "This post circulating in Richmond warns that if the city's 54% Chinese majority doesn't turn out in local elections in the fall, an Indian will be voted in by the 7.4% South Asian minority. Mass immigration is bringing factional ethnic voting to Canada."
Time to blame white people

Spencer Pratt on X - "This is the most incredible shot/chaser I've seen. In 2015 this communist lauds Canada for infinity immigration, saying it drives GDP. 11 years later, he's freaking out about Canada's GDP falling off a cliff, asking "what happened in 2015???" Stupid-smart people strike again!"
Noah Smith didn't get the memo

Cecile Shaw on X - "🇨🇦 Victor Davis Hanson commenting on Canada's immigration levels, "You're getting close to 45% of the population not being was not born in Canada, or their parents were not born in Canada.  Canada has much more immigrants than we do as a percent of its population. We (America) have an all-time high of about 16% of the population.    Right now, Canada has about 26% or 27% of its population that is immigrants. And when you add second-generation immigrants, about 7 million, and you add visa holders, who are not Canadian citizens but residents, you're getting close to 45% of the population was not born in Canada, or their parents were not born in Canada.  When you add that with a very sluggish economy, and people coming from largely Asia, India, China and Latin American countries, they have a lot of very poor people in dire need of social services in a stagnant economy that cannot support it.""

Meme - 🇨🇦Unacceptable Canadian Girl🇨🇦 @AreOhEssEyeEe: "A refugee in Canada gets $5149.11 per month TAX FREE.  The average Canadian brings home anywhere from $4100.00 - $4800.00 per month after taxes, and this is on the high side.  LET THAT SINK IN."
COSTI: "To Whom It May Concern
I am writing on behalf of my client ***... who are financially assisted by the Federal Government of Canada under the Resettlement Assistance Program (RAP) of Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada (IRCC). The length of the program is 12 months from the date of their arrival in Canada. Under the RAP program, the clients receive a monthly allowance of $1,899.41. To supplement their income, the clients are also entitled to a monthly earning of $949.70, under the Employment Incentive Policy of the RAP program. In addition, the clients are also eligible for the Child Tax Benefit, a monthly amount of approximately $1,800.00. The client is also eligible for a monthly allowance of $500.00 from RAP Housing-Top-Up allowance. The family also gets a start-up allowance of $8,326.14 for basic household needs, furniture, and clothing. After the program's termination, should *** family require any financial assistance, they are eligible for the Provincial Government's Financial Assistance Program until they become self-sufficient."

Thomas Cole | Facebook - "I pointed this out in the comments section of the Vancouver Sun a number of years ago when they were lauding a 14 year old “refugee” who was doing so well at school. Yet, the article buried the lede that her parents 1) weren’t bothering to learn English, 2) not getting any upgrades in education, 3) not employed, no intention of getting a job, 4) were getting taxpayer assistance from every level of government to the tune of around $6000 per month. Yet, we were just expected to accept this. I was attacked by so many libtards asking what my point was and why it was an issue. Just celebrate her great achievements, bigot!"

Meme - Kirk Lubimov: "How is this possible!? I put together the data of homeownership rates for refugees in Canada by years after arrival. (Not all provinces had good data) Almost 4% of refugees bought a home in their first year in Canada in Ontario, Alberta, and Manitoba. By year 5, 20% of them bought a home in Ontario and double digit across other provinces. Canada has one of the most unaffordable real estate market in the world, and people who apparently have nothing can afford it. We either have massive fraud going on or taxpayers are showering them with that much money $$$"
"Refugee Homeownership Rate by Province, Canada"

L. Wayne Mathison on X - "Global News’s reporting on a classified CBSA intelligence report. The report says 4,000 Indian citizens who entered on study permits were charged with 17,929 offences between 2019 and 2023, and more than 13,040 charges were laid in 2024 against 2,418 Indian study-permit holders. Global also points out those 2,418 people represented just over 1% of the 188,125 Indian students that year.  This makes me angry because it was 100% avoidable.  For years Canadians who questioned the sheer scale of the international-student program were brushed off as fearful, anti-immigrant or worse. Now a CBSA intelligence report says organized criminals actually exploited the student and work permit systems to establish and expand operations in Canada. That deserves accountability, not another round of political excuses.   And keep the distinction clear. The overwhelming majority of Indian students aren’t criminals. Blaming an entire community would be both wrong and stupid. The scandal is that Ottawa expanded a system faster than it could properly police it, creating opportunities for criminals while also putting legitimate immigrants and South Asian Canadians at risk.  Global reports that CBSA described a “growing operational presence” of the Bishnoi gang and the use of Canada’s immigration programs for criminal purposes. The same report says crime charges involving Indian study-permit holders rose sharply between 2016 and 2024.   Harper understood something very basic: immigration only maintains public support when Canadians believe the government knows who is entering, why they’re entering and whether the rules are being enforced.  Immigration isn’t a virtue-signalling exercise. It’s one of the most serious responsibilities a government has.  The Liberals let the system grow far beyond their ability to control it. Canadians are entitled to ask who knew, when they knew, and why it took this long to act."

The Immigration Paradox: How an Influx of Newcomers Has Led to Labour Shortages - "This study investigates the effects of Canada’s expansive immigration policy, implemented between 2016 and 2024, on labour shortages. It explores how the influx of permanent and temporary immigrants has affected the balance between labour supply and demand, with attention to whether the policy has met one of its key objectives – alleviating shortages in labour markets. It provides an analysis of labour market dynamics through the lens of the Beveridge curve, which tracks the joint path of unemployment and job vacancies over time. The study compares labour market tightness before, during, and after the pandemic and evaluates how rapidly rising immigration and the adoption of remote work have affected job vacancy rates in Canada. The arrival of immigrant workers has expanded the supply of labour to employers, but has also generated additional income and spending, and hence greater demand for labour throughout the economy. The macroeconomic evidence from this study indicates that, on balance, the increase in demand generated by immigration has more than likely outpaced the additional supply, potentially making economy-wide labour shortages more widespread rather than alleviating them."

Did Mass Immigration Make Canadians Poorer? - "Immigration did not create all of Canada’s economic problems, but historically high immigration—particularly immigration concentrated in lower-wage temporary streams—made several existing weaknesses more serious... Immigration is often discussed as though every form of immigration produces the same economic result. It does not.  A physician, engineer, entrepreneur, scientist, or highly specialized technician may earn a strong income, pay substantial taxes, create employment, and make other workers more productive. Their contribution may extend far beyond the value of their individual labour.  A worker earning close to minimum wage also contributes to the economy and deserves dignity and fair treatment. However, the fiscal and productivity effects are different.  A high-income worker generally pays more in taxes than they receive in public services. A lower-income worker pays less income tax while still requiring access to healthcare, roads, transit, education for their children, housing infrastructure, and other public systems. This does not make the lower-income worker a burden as a person. It means governments must evaluate immigration policy based on more than the total number of people admitted.  Canada’s traditional points system was built around this distinction. It prioritized education, language ability, work experience, and other measures of human capital because the country wanted immigration to raise productivity and living standards.  Keller argues that Canada weakened this focus as it expanded temporary migration and responded to employer demands for lower-wage labour. The country did not simply bring in more people. It changed the economic composition of immigration."

Ray (Formerly Charestiste)🇨🇦🍁 on X - "38% of non-white Canadians think there are too many non-white immigrants compared to 34% of white Canadians who think so"
Internalized white supremacy! Clearly the white people are lying about their real views

Trans Women in College Sports

I saw multiple left wingers sharing the same meme, which I intuitively knew was false, so I decided to dig into it myself:

"IF YOU HAD A DOLLAR FOR EVERY TRANS WOMAN IN COLLEGE SPORTS
YOU COULDN'T AFFORD A GALLON OF DIESEL."

For starters, the majority of the outrage about trans athletes is around grade school sports, certainly because the girls affected are younger and thus deemed more vulnerable. Be that as it may, we can still take the meme on its own terms and show that it is false.

Outsports, which proclaims it is "Proudly LGBTQ+ Owned and Operated *Pride flag* *Trans flag*" and links to Queerty, LGBTQ Nation, Gaycities and LGBTQ Outpost in the top navbar (and thus presumably will not be accused of left wingers of being biased), compiled a list of 47 trans athletes who have competed openly in college sports. Though the article was published in January 2025, it was Updated on October 27, 2026.

Going through the list, here are the transwomen (biological men who identify as women) listed. It wasn't always easy to identify, since "non binary" and similar people are included, but I believe I have managed to remove them:

1) Juniper Eastwood
2) Lia Thomas
3) Natalie Fahey
4) CeCé Telfer
5) Brooklyn Ross
6) Lia Smith
7) Evie Parts
8) Sadie Schreiner
9) Meghan Cortez-Fields
10) Keelin Godsey
11) Chloe Anderson
12) Athena Del Rosario
13) Ryan Lavigne (yes, I double checked)
14) Erica Smith
15) Gabbi Ludwig
16) Peachy Tabilos
17) Harriett Mackenzie

Outsports also lists Navi Huskey, a "transfeminine nonbinary" whose pronouns are "she/they/yum", Soju Hokari who plays/played Ultimate and Bella Bautista who is listed under "cheer"; both activities' status as college sports is debatable, so I will leave all of these aside, as the point is adequately made even without the technical qualifications.

So how many gallons of diesel can you buy for US$17?

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration's U.S. On-Highway Diesel Fuel Prices data dated October 27 2026, the most expensive Weekly California No 2 Diesel Retail Price has been $8.246, and this is the highest of all their data series.

So even in the most expensive state in the US, there're enough transwomen in college sports to buy not one, not two but 2.06 gallons of diesel.

In conclusion, left wingers are lying as usual.

Links - 4th November 2026 (1 - British Politics)

Restore Britain is beyond the pale - "To many, questioning whether the King is a white Briton is tantamount to asking whether the Pope is Catholic. Not so, according to Rupert Lowe, the leader of Restore Britain. Today, on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Mr Lowe repeatedly refused to say whether he considered King Charles to be a white Briton.  What was the cause of this bizarre evasion? Mr Lowe often quotes a prediction that white Britons will be a minority in the UK by 2063. This is based on a definition of the group that excludes anyone with a parent who was not born in the UK. So absurdly, His Majesty is left out, given that his father was born in Greece. By this logic, Winston Churchill, one of the greatest Britons, would also not make the cut... Charlie Downes, a co-founder of Mr Lowe’s party, posted a disgusting image on social media, which seemed to imply that Nigel Farage had been “bought” by British Jews. Elsewhere he has said that the UK is “defined by indigenous British ancestry and Christian faith”... Mr Downes is not some fringe figure in Restore Britain. He is the party’s campaign director. Trading in anti-Semitic tropes on social media and calling a journalist a “traitor to the British people” is disgraceful and unworthy of frontline politics. Is it really Mr Lowe’s intention to be represented by an extremist and peddler of online hate? Mr Lowe’s refusal to condemn, let alone expel, Mr Downes speaks volumes."

Restore refuses to sack co-founder accused of anti-Semitism - "Restore Britain has refused to sack a co-founder accused of anti-Semitism in order to strike a deal with Reform UK.  Rupert Lowe, the Restore leader, said he would not put “a young Christian man out of work” despite Reform ruling out an electoral pact unless he agreed to cut ties with Charlie Downes... Mr Downes appeared to suggest that Nigel Farage, the Reform leader, had been “bought” by Jewish supporters.  He also said Israel was committing “genocide” against Palestinians in Gaza, a policy position more commonly held on the Left."

Lowe praised Restore activist who blamed Israel for twin towers - "Frank Wright, a Restore campaigner from Newbury, Berkshire, has been hailed by Mr Lowe as a “good man” despite repeatedly sharing anti-Semitic material online. The Restore Britain leader even lauded a video in which Mr Wright said that Europe’s migration crisis is a consequence of wars in the Middle East “which only serves the grand strategy of the Israelis”... Mr Lowe has refused to sack Mr Downes, saying he would not put “a young Christian man out of work” despite Reform ruling out an electoral pact unless he agreed to cut ties with the activist. Mr Wright has thousands of followers online and liked a comment under one of his blog posts which said that his readers should consider whether liberal democracy was “merely a front for the radical Jewish takeover of the world”.  It added: “The revolutionary Jewish movement also produced the current genocidal state of Israel which helped carry out the 9/11 false-flag attacks.”... Mr Wright wrote on multiple occasions about the belief that Israel could have been behind the 2001 terrorist attacks, posting anti-Semitic images about the tragedy and sharing the unsubstantiated claim that 200 Israeli spies were expelled from the US at the time.  In one of his articles titled “ABC of Zionism”, he wrote “S is for September 11”, and repeated the claim about the Israeli spies. He has also said that Grant Shapps, the former Tory minister, who is Jewish, “speaks for Israel” because he was the national president of the youth wing of the Jewish group B’nai B’rith as a teenager.  He also said that Steven Spielberg, the Jewish film director, was part of a group of billionaires “whose sole purpose was to capture US politics and student culture for Israel”.  He has described the “Zionist lobby” as “the most powerful force in the world” and “the number one threat to the freedom of religion, of thought and of speech”... Mr Lowe said: “The Telegraph’s relentless hate campaign against Restore Britain is becoming incredibly tedious. The real enemy is the looming Left-wing alliance, yet The Telegraph spends all day every day attempting to smear me. Is this really the best use of time?”"

Britain’s Jews are right to fear the rise of Restore - "One need not struggle hard to find the stench of anti-Semitism. Mr Lowe was caught on a hot mic mocking a photographer’s “Jewish camera” and Mr Downes responded to a declaration by Reform’s Nigel Farage that he could neither be “bullied” nor “bought” with a photograph of Mr Farage at the launch of Reform’s Jewish supporters’ group... As he memorably told a Jewish podcaster, success means “People like you leaving.” When his interviewer replied “I’m an Englishman,” Mr Laws retorted: “I’m looking at you as a Jew and I’m telling you, you are foreign.”"

Meme - Zia Yusuf @ZiaYusufUK: "Reform will not hesitate to use all available means to defend our border."
Harry Eccles: "FYI, governments should always hesitate. Acting impulsively is not good governance. Please don't let these children anywhere near power."
Harry Eccles: "Since privatisation in 1989, Thames Water has made in profit enriching share holders. That could have been invested rather than syphoned off. Nationalise water. Now."
Harry Eccles @Heccles94: "Palantir are evil. Get them out of everything. Now."
Hesitation is only good when it pushes the left wing agenda

Labour loses one member every eight minutes - "The figure marked Labour’s lowest membership total in 12 years and reflected a torrid year for Sir Keir Starmer that was dominated by scandals and about-turns on policy."

Labour politicians can’t shake their ultimate hypocrisy: private schools - "What is it with Labour politicians and private schools? They rail against what they portray as bastions of elitism, but just can’t help sending their own children there. It rather neatly sums up the party’s unofficial motto: “Do as I say, not as I do.”  This week, it emerged that Miatta Fahnbulleh, the newly appointed Energy Secretary, pays £50,000 a year to send her children to private school.  Of course, there is nothing wrong with a parent choosing private education. Quite the opposite: parents who do so not only help fund state schools through their taxes, they free up space for another child. Nor should politicians be prohibited from making whatever educational choices they believe are best for their children. In fact, this is a hallmark of a free, civilised society.  But when a politician actively supports a policy that makes private education more elitist, while personally continuing to benefit from that same system, the double standard is hard to ignore.  Fahnbulleh is a former chief executive of the New Economics Foundation, a social justice think tank, and has built much of her political outlook around tackling inequality, boosting diversity and economic stability. She was educated at a private school reportedly costing around £8,000 a year. She now represents Peckham, where around 40pc of children live in poverty.  She was also one of the most prominent advocates of imposing a 20pc tax on private school fees – a policy opponents argue has made independent education unaffordable for thousands of families. Yet she continues to use the private system for her own children... t emerged that 36 Labour MPs who attended private schools had decided not to declare it in the pages of Who’s Who. Fahnbulleh was among them. The list also included John Healey, the new Chancellor, and Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary. James Murray, the financial secretary to the Treasury who attended the £57,000-a-year St Paul’s School in London, also did not have his private education included in his Who’s Who entry.  And Anneliese Dodds, a supporter of Labour’s VAT policy, also failed to declare her £21,000-a-year education.  Surely they’re not embarrassed? Or perhaps they’re worried about a future tax raid, to be paid retrospectively by those who benefited from a superior education... reducing inequality supposedly sits at the heart of the party’s philosophy. And the contradiction matters because Labour’s justification for the VAT policy is fundamentally about inequality.  If the purpose of the policy is to make education “fairer”, it is legitimate to ask whether those who designed and championed it should themselves be willing to accept its consequences... The decision to opt out of the state system is a personal one, but for a politician at the forefront of policy, it is also a public statement. It signals a lack of confidence in the state school system they are tasked with improving – and raises important questions about their confidence in a policy they have promised to fix."
Time for the "yet you participate in society" meme to justify left wing hypocrisy

The Liberal Democrats are bad for Britain - "There is little more dangerous to Britain’s prosperity than a Liberal Democrat MP.  For all of the party’s moralistic grandstanding on the national stage about matters of climate change, diplomacy and, for some reason, Fifa, the party proves time and again it is little more than a cover for the selfish, the petty and the tragically short-sighted.  While the populist ends of the political spectrum certainly talk a more dangerous game, their relative unpopularity prevents them getting any real handle on power. The Lib Dems, however, with their cuddly, centrist image, frequently get their hands on the levers and have proven remarkably effective at grinding progress to a shuddering halt.  They caused real damage to the future growth and productivity of the nation during their five-year spell in coalition government, but it is in local government that their myopic pettifogging truly shines.  Roughly half the population of England and Wales is currently subject to a hosepipe ban, with drought declared across more than 70pc of the total landmass... The Abingdon reservoir would probably have rendered a hosepipe ban moot this year, and would have prevented enormous tankers clogging up our roads to transport drinking water.  Moran’s aversion long predates these comments, and in more ridiculous fashion. Back in 2018, she admitted that, while campaigning against the reservoir partly on environmental grounds, she was unaware that the reservoir would, in fact, have many benefits for the local and national environment – from new natural habitats to the protection of precious chalk streams.  She had also complained about the size of the reservoir, while claiming “we all love Didcot power station”, the sort of large, growth-engendering structure that is anathema to her politics. Let’s not forget, this reservoir would also have supported the construction of thousands of new homes in the Oxford-Cambridge Growth Corridor. A lack of water infrastructure was explicitly raised as a blocker to the level of prosperity such a proposal could achieve during a conference I attended earlier this year.  At that event, Irene Tracey, the vice-chancellor of the University of Oxford, defined the core issue as a “deep culture of anti-growth in the UK” – and, if you ask me, the Lib Dems are the chief cheerleaders. But of course, Moran is not unique in her disregard for the future. A more successful Lib Dem leadership hopeful has spent longer eating his words.  Back in 2010, the first and only Lib Dem leader to enter Downing Street was busy proving he couldn’t see past his own nose.  In the same year his party condemned the country to a fantastically costly burden in the form of the triple lock on state pensions, Nick Clegg simultaneously damned the nation to ruinously expensive energy bills.  He said: “By the most optimistic scenarios from the Government itself, there’s no way they’re going to have new nuclear come on stream until about 2021, 2022. So it’s just not even an answer.” I don’t know about you, but here in 2026, I’d be pretty happy with some four-year-old nuclear power stations reducing our reliance on foreign imports of gas and intermittent renewables. I’d have been overjoyed with it in 2022 as we faced the worst energy crisis in a generation. This lack of political imagination, this inability to see beyond the next election cycle, is precisely what has landed us in the mess we’re in.  No new reservoirs have been built in more than three decades, and we have a dearth of clean, safe, reliable energy.  Lib Dem constituencies across the land continually fight to prevent the vital improvement of the infrastructure of our national grid, with their demands to bury all transmission lines under the ground, which comes at an obscene price compared with the proven and simple method of pylons.  What rankles most about these middle-class eco-warriors is their hypocrisy.  They spend their days smugly proclaiming their love for the planet, their love for the less fortunate, their righteous cause – yet each and every day fight tooth and nail to prevent the very progress that would alleviate these issues."

Ed Miliband is the most tragic kind of overgrown student politician - "“Speak softly and carry a big stick” – that was the art of diplomacy according to Theodore Roosevelt.  “Speak aggressively and carry a tiny stick” – that’s the new version according to Ed Miliband.  The Foreign Secretary this week waded in over a controversial new settlement in the West Bank. Israel wants to build 1,200 homes there. Miliband called it an “unacceptable and destructive act”... In their gilt-lined bubbles, the Milibands can afford to stick with the student politics of their Oxford years and never be mugged by reality. And Ed has extra insulation from the necessities of realpolitik. It seems he was made Foreign Secretary by Andy Burnham as a sop for not getting his coveted job as chancellor – where his student politics would have brought even more carnage.  And so, in return for not kicking up a fuss at not getting what he wanted, he can defy the conventions of diplomacy.  Miliband’s politics are a version of what Kingsley Amis called “how it will go down at the club”. Instead of thinking about the general public, this type of person wonders how his ideas will go down “in the circle of his colleagues, his friends in the profession, certain critics and a more or less specialised and expert section of the public”."

Labour-run Islington council proposes traveller pitches over housing - "A Labour-run council is proposing to build new traveller pitches instead of social housing, The Telegraph can disclose.  Islington council, in north London, has published proposals to use 71 Ronalds Road for up to three new pitches – land allocated to individual families that will form a wider traveller site.  But the authority faces a backlash from residents because in 2017 it had pledged to use the site to build a community centre and council homes."

Ben Graham on X - "Dale Vince, who has ploughed millions into Labour, funded independent candidate Count Binface to the tune of £180,000 for the Clacton by-election. Meanwhile, Conservatives were out canvassing for Binface. The uniparty really is something. And the end result? Nigel Farage got more votes than he did at the 2024 General Election."

Labour peer claims Reform is ‘building next road to Auschwitz’ - "Lord Sikka appeared to liken Nigel Farage’s party to the Nazis in a post sent from his BlueSky account in response to Reform’s housing policy.  The post said: “Reform says it would put foreign-born UK citizens lower on social housing list (sic). Couples with a foreign-born partner will face discrimination.  “Children of UK citizens will be denied social housing because one parent was born abroad. They don’t hide racism. Reform [is] building the next road to Auschwitz.”... Reform’s plan for the biggest shake-up of social housing in a generation would prioritise young British married working couples with children, along with military veterans.  Foreign-born nationals would be evicted from council homes after being given three months to find alternative accommodation under the proposals.  Lee Anderson, the Reform chairman, has written to Lord Kennedy, the Labour chief whip in the Lords, to express “grave concern” about Lord Sikka’s post.  Mr Anderson said: “Members of the House of Lords are very much held in high regard and they should absolutely be held accountable for their words and actions.  “Given the recent rise in political attacks, in particular on Reform UK figures, including the recent murder of Ann Widdecombe, I hope you will take swift and decisive action in relation to the matter I raise with you.”... An analysis of social media posts by Lord Sikka, who became a peer in 2020, shows that it is the sixth time he has accused Reform of seeking to build “the next road to Auschwitz”... Lord Sikka’s remarks are not the first time that a senior Labour figure has come under fire for attempting to invoke the Nazis in relation to Reform and Mr Farage.  At last year’s Labour conference, David Lammy, the then deputy prime minister, was forced to row back on his claim that Mr Farage “once flirted with the Hitler Youth”.  He repeated allegations that the Reform leader marched through a village “shouting Hitler Youth songs” while a schoolboy. Mr Farage has always denied the claims, which stem from a 1981 letter from one of his schoolteachers and were first made more than a decade ago... During his suspension from Labour last year, John McDonnell, who has since had the whip restored, likened Mr Farage to Adolf Hitler and called Reform a “fascist organisation”.  Speaking at a fringe event at the Trades Union Congress conference, Mr McDonnell said: “Reform are a proto-fascist organisation. We’ve seen it in the ‘30s.  “What they do, they have a demagogue speaking for them, they target a particular group, in the thirties in Germany it would have been the Jews, here it is asylum seekers.”"

Terrified of Farage, Labour might be planning an almighty electoral gamble - "Labour did well out of the first-past-the-post system two years ago. Despite winning just 34 per cent of the vote across the UK, it secured 63 per cent of the seats – enough for an overall majority of 174.  So why might nearly 100 Labour MPs be pressing for the Government to commit itself next week to the creation of a commission on electoral reform – with a view to including a pledge in Labour’s next manifesto to switch to proportional representation? After all, Labour would have been well short of the 326 seats needed for a Commons majority if the 2024 election had been held under any of the likely alternatives.  In part, the move is a legacy of Labour’s 14 years in the wilderness between 2010 and 2024. During that time, many in the party came to doubt whether it would ever again be able to win an overall majority under a first-past-the-post system that had seemingly come to be biased against it. Better then perhaps to switch to a system that would make it difficult for the Tories to win a majority too... The long-lauded “winners’ bonus” under first-past-the-post from which Labour had profited in 2024 no longer looked so attractive to Labour MPs horrified at the prospect of Nigel Farage walking triumphantly through the front door of 10 Downing St.  Proportional representation, in contrast, would make it impossible for Reform (or anybody else) to win a majority on 30 per cent. Instead, it would open up the possibility that between them Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Greens and the nationalist parties would have enough seats between them to keep Reform out of power."
Elites will stop at nothing to thwart the electorate

Keir Starmer on X - "It has been an honour and a privilege to represent Holborn and St Pancras for the last 11 years. My statement."
Zarah Sultana MP on X - "You’re a war criminal."
Left wingers get more deranged daily

Labour is obsessed with identity politics, says Red Wall MP - "Jonathan Hinder, the MP for Pendle and Clitheroe, also said the party had too often accused voters who expressed concerns about migration of being racist."

Polanski faces questions over claims his family fled the Holocaust - "Zack Polanski’s tale of ancestral migration from Europe has faced questions after it emerged all four of his grandparents were born in Britain.  Speaking at the Green Party conference last October, the Green Party leader said he was proud of his Jewish heritage and told party members his ancestors had “faced the Nazis” in Poland before arriving in England.  However, Mr Polanski’s recent ancestors were reportedly all in Britain before the Second World War, which raises the question of which of them fled the Nazi regime.  He said: “I am literally the product of migration. It’s why defending migrants matters so much to me... Public records of births, marriages and deaths confirm Mr Polanski’s great and great-great-grandparents came from Latvia and Russia, which Mr Polanski has previously said.  However, historical census records from 1891, 1901 and other public resources, suggest they settled in the UK in the late 19th and 20th centuries. His four grandparents all come from the north of England and both his parents were born in Manchester... A Green Party spokesman said: “Jewish family history is often confusing and muddled, as Zack has acknowledged. It’s astonishing that the only current Jewish leader of a British political party is having his family history raked over by the press in an attempt to discredit him.”"
Terrorism supporters lie about everything, so
It's rich for them to accuse those who point out the truth of anti-Semitism, when they are so anti-Semitic themselves

Jews are to blame for rising anti-Semitism, suggests Polanski - "The Green Party has faced increasing accusations of anti-Semitism since Mr Polanski became leader.   In April, two Green local election candidates were arrested on suspicion of stirring up racial hatred for allegedly posting anti-Semitic comments online.  The Telegraph revealed that almost 20 Green candidates had posted offensive material, including one who referred to Jewish people as “cockroaches”. Other hopefuls expressed support for Palestine Action, the banned terror group."
Good luck if you blame Muslims for "Islamophobia"

The Jewish Chronicle on X - "Chair of Amnesty leaves Green Party over ‘antisemitic motion’"
Rachel Moiselle on X - "The Greens lost Amnesty. I repeat: the Greens lost Amnesty."

Letters: Reform UK can no longer simply be dismissed as a protest party - "Angela Rayner, the Housing Secretary, and Lord Blunkett have described the two £36m donations to Reform UK from Christopher Harborne and Ben Delo as “anti-democratic”. Ben Delo has explained his reasons (Comment, September 12), but, as it doesn’t suit Ms Rayner and Lord Blunkett to understand them, they never will.   Far from being anti-democratic, these donations support democracy by seeking to establish a more level playing field. This terrifies Labour, and perhaps the Conservatives, too.   Ms Rayner should look closer to home for undemocratic behaviour. Not only has Labour installed as Prime Minister a man whose democratic mandate comes from the single constituency of Makerfield, but the party is also seeking to overturn step by step the result of the 2016 EU referendum – against pledges made at the 2024 election – and hoping that no one will notice.   If Labour wishes to continue this political strategy, it should call a general election with a view to securing a proper mandate."

Burnham lifted policies from Starmer survival plan - "Andy Burnham has borrowed extensively from Sir Keir Starmer’s plan to cling on to power despite pledging a “new path for Britain”, leaked documents have revealed.  A 50-page dossier of Sir Keir’s policy proposals for the rest of the year shows he intended to pursue fiscal devolution for mayors, discounted transport and support for energy bills, all of which Mr Burnham has announced since taking office.  The leak suggests that many of the Prime Minister’s most radical plans were already under way in Downing Street before he took over, rather than forming part of the “turning point” he had promised voters."

Protesters ‘attack Restore campaigner with scalding coffee’ - "A Restore Britain canvasser was punched while handing out leaflets in Camden, police have said.  A woman was arrested on suspicion of assault and placed in custody, police said, after a group of 30 Stand Up To Racism protesters clashed with a dozen Restore canvassers on Saturday morning.  The Stand Up To Racism gathered in the London constituency of Holborn and St Pancras as part of a planned protest to disrupt Restore Britain’s by-election canvassing.  Rupert Lowe, the Restore leader, wrote in a post on X: “Our Restore Britain team campaigning in Holborn & St Pancras this morning has been attacked by ‘anti-racist’ protestors. “One member of our campaign team is in hospital being treated now, the police are involved.”  He added: “I assume all those politicians who spent the other weekend screaming for police action over a perfectly peaceful protest in Dover against illegal migrants will be publicly condemning the ‘anti-racist’ mob violence against Restore Britain activists in London today?”  However, Lewis Nielson from Stand Up To Racism, told The Telegraph: “If you look at our videos you’ll see that our crowd was mainly young women confronting big burly blokes, some of whom have been in neo-Nazi fascist terror organisations.  “The idea that these women went and beat up these big blokes is laughable.”"
Proof that Restore and Reform need to be banned for inciting violence!
Clearly, the police are all "far right" for arresting a young woman "confronting big burly blokes" and need to be purged of fascism sympathisers

The Free Speech Union on X - "It is deeply shocking that a Conservative councillor thought he could use West Midlands Police as his personal tool to silence comments he disliked about himself — especially when they were made by a 15-year-old child.  More shocking still is that West Midlands Police investigated and arrested the child. This is not an isolated case: the force has a record of zealously acting on complaints about “hurty words” online.  Calling someone a “rent boy” may be personally offensive to the councillor, but it is not a hate crime.  We are in the UK, not North Korea. Politicians must not be able to use the police to silence people who insult them.  This is a blatant abuse of power — an assault on both free speech and democracy."

The government is keeping a list of people who question their policies - "Negative X and Reddit posts from unsuspecting Brits attacking the UK’s anti-terror programme Prevent were added to a database of critical online comments.  Metro has obtained a list of nearly 80 critical posts found and logged by the Standards and Compliance Unit (StaCU), which oversees Prevent, between March 2024 and February 2025.  One campaign group whose tweet was recorded in the database said the revelations raised ‘serious questions about freedom of expression and the right to dissent and protest’ in the UK. Jacob Smith, who fought for a year to get the Home Office to publish the information, said: ‘You should be allowed to criticise government policy without being put on a list.’  StaCU is an ‘opaque’ body set up in February 2024 to address and investigate complaints about Prevent, the safeguarding programme designed to stop people becoming terrorists.  As well as processing reports made directly to the unit, officials appear to be actively scouring the net for critical posts about Prevent.  Freedom of Information requests – seen exclusively by Metro – have revealed the 77 negative online comments logged by StaCU.  Many of these posts came from ordinary Brits who wouldn’t suspect that government officials would be looking at their feeds.  A large number of the investigated comments are claims that Prevent is ‘biased’ in how it trains public sector staff to spot the early signs of radicalisation.  One X user ended up on the list because after they claimed they called the training ‘complete bullshit’.  They complained: ‘Anyone’s who done the prevent training knows it only talks about the far right. Islam extremism isn’t even mentioned.’  Another poster complained that they ‘sat through Prevent training at work… and the narrative was very much that the far right is the biggest threat’. They added: ‘I kid you not!’ While many claims relate to claims that Prevent is overly focused on right-wing extremism, other posts investigated by StaCU are negative about the government in different ways...   Their Programme Manager for Pre-Crime, Sarah Lasoye, told Metro: ‘Prevent has expanded far beyond its stated aim of identifying people considered “vulnerable to radicalisation”, and has increasingly been used to justify extensive surveillance.  ‘It is deeply concerning to see the Prevent duty being used to enable the monitoring of people and organisations simply because they are critical of the programme. That raises serious questions about freedom of expression and the right to dissent and protest.  ‘There is also a troubling lack of transparency about what happens to the information gathered through this social media monitoring: how long it is retained, who it is shared with, and ultimately what the government is using it for.’...   The Home Office fought for more than a year not to disclose their ‘database’ of critical X and Reddit posts...   Smith, Freedom of Expression and Belief Team Leader at the human rights group, told Metro: ‘People should be able to express their views on social media without that being catalogued in government databases.  ‘You should be allowed to criticise government policy without being put on a list.’  Rights & Security International are concerned about the Home Office’s ‘resistance to disclosing this information’ and want to know ‘who has access to’ it... The Campaign Against Antisemitism also had one of their posts added to the database of critical comments.  Their Tweet does not mention Prevent by name but criticised a Hezbollah vigil, designated a terrorist group in the UK, allegedly not being taken seriously by police officers.  A spokesperson for Campaign Against Antisemitism said: ‘We aren’t sure whether to be flattered or concerned that StaCU has picked up a post of ours.  ‘If it’s because we’ve dared to be critical of law enforcement’s lax attitude toward Islamist extremism in this country, we stand by what we said and would reiterate it for as long as it takes to bring about change. "
Left wingers still complain that Prevent doesn't care about the "far right", because it doesn't jail anyone with an opinion to the right of the far left

Meme - Bradford Green Party: ""There should be no street, no neighbourhood and no place in this country where you can't live your life in peace." @MothinAli calls for an equal right to exist and belong in his Green Party Conference speech."
H.K. Uber. @ @Moriartys..:-"Smashing, so me, my partner & our pet dog would be welcome on any street in Bradford ?"
"@bradfordgreens has blocked you. You can view public posts from @bradfordgreens, but you are blocked from engaging with them. You also cannot follow or message @bradfordgreens."
Islamoleftism strikes again!

Links - 3rd November 2026 (2 - Trans Mania)

Thread by @segm_ebm on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "🚨 WPATH has conceded in court that its "Standards of Care" is merely an opinion. WPATH says it represents one side of an unsettled scientific debate marked by uncertainty — and physicains & orgs that rely on WPATH as the standard of care must bear "independent responsibility." WPATH now agrees that pediatric transgender medicine is marked by "medical and scientific uncertainty." It represents its SOC-8 recommendations merely as an expression of WPATH's "free speech." Yet for years, WPATH presented its guidelines as an unquestionable medical standard of care. The social and scientific costs of questioning their recommendations were steep and could be career-ending. WPATH now says there are two sides to the scientific debate over care for gender-dysphoric youth. On one, the gender-affirming model WPATH promotes. On the other, the Cass Review and Cass-aligned policies such as restrictions or bans on puberty blockers and hormones for minors. To defend itself against the FTC in the federal court, WPATH leans 𝐟𝐚𝐯𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐲 on two Supreme Court rulings that under normal circumstances it decries. One is Skrmetti, which allowed states to ban transgender interventions for minors. The other is the pro-"conversion therapy" Chiles v. Salazar ruling. Leaning on the pro-state-bans Skrmetti ruling, WPATH argues that the states have the right to regulate transgender interventions. While some states exercised their right to ban them—other states likewise have the right to promote transgender interventions for minors, using WPATH as the state-endorsed standard of care.In what appears to be a desperate move, WPATH favorably quotes the SCOTUS ruling that cleared the path for administering talk therapy aimed at changing homosexual orientation and gender identity (Chiles v. Salazar). WPATH previously strongly objected to both as forms of conversion therapy.  Now, WPATH argues that although conversion therapy may be "substandard care," the Court rightly protected it as free speech. They argue that, likewise, WPATH's own SOC-8 guidelines should also be protected as "free speech"—even if the care they advocate for is judged as "substandard."
SEGM is not a policy-making group. Rather, we communicate with the clinical community, and often have to explain why we do not consider the WPATH Standards of Care to be evidence-based.  Our reading of the latest WPATH filing: WPATH's message is that its "Standards of Care" are merely an opinion and an expression of free speech. Clinicians who rely on the SOC-8 document—and organizations that refer to it as the implied standard of care for gender-dysphoric youth—are, in fact, taking on independent responsibility for the premise that the document represents trustworthy clinical guidance.  In turn, patients who trust the clinicians following the WPATH Standards of Care should know they are in a "buyer beware" situation. They are being treated based on what WPATH asserts to be merely an expression of "free speech"—representing only one side of an unsettled scientific debate marked by "medical and scientific uncertainty."
This most recent WPATH court filing is here and deserves to be read in full:"
Wesley Yang on X - "It was always a desperate con. It was never real. It was never true. Well informed people have all understood this for more than a decade.   And now the institution upon which the charade of scientific authority across American institutions relied has said so itself in federal court.  It was a con orders of magnitude worse than Jason Arday, because it implicated nearly every organ of scientific and medical consensus in a conspiracy to tell the most brazen lie ever told by those institutions at the largest scale any such lie has ever been told, and because on the basis of this lie, tens of thousands of confused were medically harmed in pursuit of a delusion that can never be true."

William Allen | Facebook - "Well I have read clinical guidelines, I know many tranistioners and detransitioners, I AM a detransitioner, and I have talked to gender specialists.   My slightly less than clinical evaluation of you is... you're all full of crap.   Patrick Hahn, author of Irreversible, has done exhaustive research into this penomenon, the 'scientists' and physicians who promote it, and the actual so-called research you use to further your agenda.   He discovered that absolutely every 'study' you all rely on is flawed in multiple ways and falls short of your desired conclusions... yet you depend on them anyway, in hopes that no one verifes your work.  But Patrick did. Excerpt from Irreversible.
"𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘴𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘵𝘺 𝘯𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘹 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘺, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘦𝘺 𝘸𝘦 𝘱𝘶𝘮𝘱 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘨𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘹 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦 𝘣𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘶𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘺 𝘣𝘦𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴 – 𝘤𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭-𝘱𝘢𝘪𝘥, 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭-𝘰𝘳𝘨𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘥𝘦𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘭𝘶𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘺𝘭𝘦 – 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘨𝘦𝘵 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘱𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘻𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘴. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘥, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘣𝘪𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘦, 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦 “𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘴” 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘱𝘺 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘱 𝘢𝘯𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘨𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘰𝘣𝘴𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘯 𝘢 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘧𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺 𝘥𝘢𝘴𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘨𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 (𝘰𝘧𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘴), 𝘞𝘗𝘈𝘛𝘏 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘣𝘰𝘥𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘤𝘵 𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘲𝘶𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘴𝘦𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦."
In 2011, the most complete and longest running study with the most participants, in the most friendly nation to transgenderism... concluded that adult sex reassignment is a dismal failure, leading to regret on a massive scale, and post-op suicide rates 5 - 19 times that of the general population. Reasonable people know what the responsible reaction should have been, but what did you all do?  You doubled down... and came after the children. Folks, Irreversible by Patrick Hahn is a must read for anyone willing to hear the truth about the trans ideology and those like Helen Weberly who push it.  Don't wait, get your copy now, learn the truth, and send Helen Weberly and her ilk packing."

A mob viciously beat a trans couple. Now the alleged victims could get sent to prison. - LGBTQ Nation
Trans couple ‘beaten by mob’ arrested instead of alleged attackers
Trans couple arrests spark social media outrage as ordinance emerges
There is a marked contrast between the media coverage of the arrest of Aurora Rush and Shae Sander. KTAL News is neutral in reporting, mentioning that some find the story incredulous and crucially, contacting the police for comment
LGBTQ Nation and Pink News are unsurprisingly one-sided. At first I was surprised Metro Weekly was too, but then they call themselves "Washington's LGBTQ Magazine", so that explains it all.

Gunther Eagleman™ on X - "🚨 PORTLAND MOM BANNED FOR SPEAKING UP
A Portland mother is suing after the school banned her from events for objecting to their gender ideology curriculum.  Her 11-year-old was given an “identity flower” assignment asking the child to discuss their gender identity. The school also pushed the pride flag hard.  She handed out flyers on a public sidewalk. The school labeled her behavior “harassment” and locked her out.  Public school. Public sidewalk. Taxpayer money. And they still try to silence parents."

Matt Calkins on X - "After 11 years as a sports columnist at the Seattle Times, I have decided to resign. It was entirely my choice, and it was not an easy one. The impetus was the Times declining to run a column I wrote from the perspective of two female student athletes who were opposed to competing against biological males. It was one of several pieces of mine that had been spiked, and I no longer felt like I could properly do my job as a columnist. I lay out the situation in greater detail in the link below, but I want to say that I enjoyed my time with the paper, find the talent there to be immense, and have no animosity toward anyone who works there. It was just time for a change."
I was a sports columnist at the Seattle Times for 11 years. This is why I resigned - "I spoke to people attending a rally in support of Sophie Cunningham outside Climate Pledge Arena. The Fever guard had recently taken a stance against biological males competing in women’s/girls sports, and a few dozen folks showed up to express their gratitude for her position.  One of them was 16-year-old Ahnaleigh Wilson, who’d lost to a biological male in a track and field race in eighth grade and was holding a sign reading “Thank You Sophie for Speaking up for Girls!”  I didn’t know if I was going to write something at that point, but after she allegedly got cussed out by a Storm co-owner during the game, I felt like I had to weigh in... This, after all, was one of several columns of mine that had been spiked at the Seattle Times.  One was a piece questioning whether players for the U.S. Women’s Soccer Team were really the victims of discrimination in their equal-pay lawsuit. Another was a more general column on cancel culture in sports. The last, written shortly after George Floyd’s death, implored people to listen to state-champion basketball coach Mike Bethea — a black man urging the public not to stereotype cops. The common theme? All of these challenged prevailing newsroom narratives and likely would have triggered the outrage mob.  I’ve always thought that it was a columnist’s duty to generate discussion on the most hot-button issues. To avoid such topics was to leave the reader shortchanged. I guess in the end, I just didn’t feel like I could do my job properly anymore... in thinking about this decision, I kept going back to an Albus Dumbledore line: “We must all face the choice between what is right and what is easy.”  To be honest, I’m scared shitless right now. I have no idea how the next few months or years are going to play out. But that fear beats the indignity of being muzzled."

Meme - Jennuh @JennuhMarilyn: "Anyone who refers to trans women as "biological men" is either ignorant or a bigot. Gender has nothing to do with biology, if you refuse to accept science and common sense you have severe issues that can only be unpacked in therapy"
Trust the "Science"!
Weird. We keep being told that sex and gender are different and only ignorant people don't know that

Meme - Jack @j4ppleby: "This is utterly astonishing"
Dr Helen Webberley (she/her): "She's so so so wrong. Being female means having the brain of a woman."
J.K. Rowling @jk _row...: "Female means possessing the reproductive system that produces eggs instead of sperm. it is irrelevant whether said system is defective, immature or surgically altered. I just described every female on earth."
Weird. We're told that sex and gender are different and only ignorant people don't know that

Meme - "EVERY TRANS COMIC EVER MADE"
Cute girl: "LALALA, I'M JUST A SILLY TRANSGIRL MINDING MY OWN BUSINESS!"
Man with Nazi Swastika shirt and red cap and JKR heart tattoo: "WAIT, YOU'RE NoT A WOMAN ! WHAT'S THIS BULGE UNDER YOuR SKIRT?"
Cute girl: "IT'S MY ANTI-BIGOT BaT" *BZOING!*
"DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE!"
Smug Sonic the Hedgehog thinking: "WHAT A WOMAN !! I THINK I'M IN Love !!"

Aaron Rupar on X - "Linda McMahon: "After the Biden administration allowed schools to secretly transition students without parents' knowledge, President Trump is defending parental rights like never before""
Travis Akers 🇺🇸 on X - "There is not a single K-12 public school in the United Stares that transitioned any students. Not one. Y’all think we just keep an operating room back behind the cafeteria or something and trans kids during recess? People are so dumb."
How Transphobic. Why don't Transphobes know that you don't need surgery to transition?! Trump haters need to do better. They are literally denying that Trans people exist

LanaQuest aka RosaSparks on X - "So where is this happening? In the cafeteria? What child has been secretly transitioned in school? This is some goofy shit. #DemsUnited"
Erin for Parental Rights on X - "Fascinating how so many people are out here saying “this doesn’t happen” and “this is a made up MAGA problem.”   So let me shed some light… This happened to my little girl (and at the time I was a staunch Democrat who had just voted for Joe Biden.)   I went public and discovered it had happened to many others. I sued all the way to the Supreme Court — along with other affected parents.   The school district admitted to and defended it, in legal documents. Justice Alito called our case “troubling and tragic” and an issue of “great and growing national importance.”   It was a living nightmare that almost destroyed my child.   But willfully ignorant TDS sufferers will claim mine was an isolated incident…   So here are some other lawsuits from affected families that anyone can research, each with hundreds of pages of evidence:
These have reached Supreme Court:
• John and Jane Parents v Montgomery County (23-601)
• Parents Protecting Our Children v Eau Claire (23-1180)
• Foote v Ludlow (25-77)
• Lee v Poudre (25-89) **my case**
• Littlejohn v Leon (25-289)
• Lavigne v Great Salt Bay (25-759)
These other cases have been filed in lower courts all over the country:
• Doe v Weiser (Colorado)
• Mead v Rockford Public School District (Michigan)
• Vitsaxaki v Skaneateles Central SD (New York)
• Lema v Davenport (New Jersey)
• Regina v Staley (California)
• Doe/Heaps v Delaware Valley (New Jersey)
• Blair v Appomattox (Virginia)
• Konen v Spreckles (California)
• Perez v Broskie (Florida)
• Koltenbach v Hilliard City Schools (Ohio)
• DF/Figliola v Harrisonburg City Schools (Virginia)
• Wiley v Sweetwater County School District (Wyoming)
• Parents Defending Ed v Linn-Mar (Iowa)
• TF v Kettle Moraine (Wisconsin)
So many other brave parents have come forward with FACTS about their child’s secret school transition: @bourne_beth2345 , @ErinFriday75490 , @LydiamamaTerf , @AlyashchenkoX , @nogenderpredtrs  just to name a few.   The gaslighting phase has ended. Parents who’ve endured the horrors of the secret school transition of our kids can no longer be denied. There’s too many of us now. We’re going to end this nightmare for other parents,  no matter how many people play pretend that we don’t exist."
This won't stop left wingers lying that schools don't transition children, even if they don't do the motte and bailey (as per the previous link block)
Keywords: transition kids in schools, transition children in schools, transition kids at school, transition children at school

Steve Stewart-Williams on X - "“Around a third of liberal students think professors should be reported for saying that biological sex is a scientific fact, and that there are two sexes.”"
Weird. I thought reality has a left wing bias

Jonathan Kay on X - "My latest for @Quillette: A "trans-inclusive" Australian Rules Football team in California allowed a 6'1" man to compete with the women. Our Quillette investigation identified him as an ex-con who'd been sentenced to 41 years in jail for raping children."

Meme - Jennuh @JennuhMarilyn: "From a trans woman, thank you Pablo for being realistic and also showcasing our humanity with your platform. It means more than you will ever know"
Pablo Torre @PabloTorre: "A category where >99% of the people were born with a vagina. And the other <1% are being used as bait to distract from the most financially corrupt regime in U.S. history"
Clay Travis @ClayTravis: "Pablo, what is a woman?"
Left wingers are retarded because by this definition and their claims, male illegal immigrants are all women

Genevieve Gluck on X - ""I'm openly trans now. It's a lot easier. But that rush will be missed, of having that secret.""
🙏🌧🌍 on X - "This perfectly illustrates just how dangerous it is to accept fetishes into everyday life. These men are never satisfied and eventually need to take it further."

Mary Dyer on X - "Women: “Woman means adult female human being.”
Transwomen: “Woman is an identity.  A social role.  Saying that women are female is deeply misogynist because it’s reducing women to their bodies.  I mean, there’s not even one physical trait that’s shared by every single cis woman in the world, so technically you can’t even define female without inevitably excluding millions of cis women.  It’s therefore much more inclusive to define woman as anyone who identifies as a woman.”
NHS Wales: “Hey, you’re right!  You won’t mind if we cancel all your surgeries that would have given you the physical characteristics of a female, then?  After all, your proclaimed identity should be enough; you don’t need any physical alterations, because that would be misogynist and reductive.”
Transwomen: “OH MY GOD I’M GOING TO KILL MYSELF IF I CAN’T GET MY COCK TURNED INTO A SAD MIMICRY OF A VAGINA!!!  I’LL NEVER BE A REAL WOMAN!!!  REEEEEEEEEEEE!!!”"

Brazilian feminist forced to flee, faces 25 years in prison for calling a biological man a man - "Brazil has allegedly been used by the Open Society and the Ford Foundation as a “laboratory” for transgender ideology. Isabella Cêpa, a 30-year-old marketing consultant and graphic designer, has become both a victim of and a symbol of the consequences of a politicised, radical trans agenda.  Cêpa, who grew up amid domestic violence and sexual abuse, has used her Instagram account to address issues such as women’s rights and violence against women. This became increasingly difficult when the transgender movement claimed a monopoly on defining what a woman is. In response, Cêpa adopted more radical feminist positions and, as a result, became a respected voice in Brazil, known for disseminating information about violence and for her unequivocal opposition to allowing biological men who “identify” as women access to female-only spaces – prisons, changing rooms, showers, etc.   Cêpa’s activism took a dramatic turn when, in 2020, she criticised Erika Hilton, a transgender person elected to the São Paulo City Council as the “woman” who had received the most votes. Cêpa referred to Hilton as a man – and was met with a wave of accusations as a result. In June 2022, she was charged with five counts of “racism” after a 2019 Supreme Court ruling equated discrimination against LGBTQ+ communities with racism. Four of the charges stemmed from retweets of innocuous posts addressing issues such as keeping transwomen out of women’s prisons; for example, one post stating that “this is the last chance to vote if we believe transwomen do not belong in women’s prisons”. The maximum penalty for “misgendering” is up to 25 years’ imprisonment.   In July 2024, she planned a trip to Spain to visit a friend. At Salvador Bahia Airport, a federal agent informed her that her passport had been “flagged”. He asked whether there were any legal proceedings or charges pending against her. The agent warned her of political persecution and advised her not to return to Brazil.  Cêpa, who had already lost her job, first fled to Spain, then to Morocco and subsequently to Portugal. In Morocco, she spent six months as the only foreigner in a small town of 5,000 inhabitants. Financially ruined, she applied for asylum in the EU, but her application was initially met with scepticism:.. Cêpa, as the first Brazilian since the military dictatorship, has been granted refugee status on the grounds of political persecution. She is also the first woman in the world to have had to flee her country because of her opposition to transgender ideology...   Several women whose posts Cêpa has retweeted are now reportedly under investigation by the Brazilian prosecuting authorities."

Nicole Solas, Sued by the Teachers Union on X - "RI's Advisory Cmte to US Commission on Civil Rights is wild. They just fight abt pronouns.   One member, Lucia Delaroca, attacked @RamonaBessinger  for calling a male Cmte membet "he." She called it:  malicious, harassment, bullying, entitlement, unchecked misconduct, petulant, degrading disruption, ignoring boundaries of civil behavior.  Her diaper almost exploded.   These are the people appointed to do sTuDiEs about our CiViL rIgHtS 🤤"
Wesley Yang on X - "It should be clear to anyone reading this astonishing document or watching the mind-bending video quote tweeted below it that transgenderism, the movement to deploy state power to coerce everyone into treating any man who says he is a woman as if he is a woman, has cannibalized “civil rights” entirely"

Rona Dinur on X - "In one of his papers, Dr. Talia Bettcher claims that "rape by deception" by trans people who deceive others about their biological sex is OK, because they see themselves as the opposite sex and because the current "gender system" oppresses them.   Now he's been put in charge of an academic chair dedicated to "preventing gender-based violence" at the University of Waterloo.   Academia is an upside-down world"

Charlie Walsham on X - "Gay rights succeeded because they asked society for something profoundly liberal: let consenting adults live their lives without persecution.   Gender activism made a fundamentally different demand: change your language, change your definitions and sometimes surrender sex-based boundaries.  No wonder it became divisive."
Stacey on X - "You left out gender activism’s most outrageous demand:     Change your children’s character and moral values by teaching them that, in order to be a good person, they must:   (1) devalue the importance of truth and prioritize the feelings and demands of others, (2) suppress their knowledge of what they have seen and heard with their own eyes and ears, and (3) distrust their parents and the values that their parents taught them.    Horrific and destructive."

KOMO News on X - "Cornerback Terrion Arnold is charged with eight felonies and faces life in prison. Seahawks Head Coach Mike Macdonald addressed the team's decision to sign him, saying the team was well aware of both Arnold's talent and the allegations against him before moving forward."
Brandi Kruse on X - "Just to be clear. The @Seahawks fired Dori Monson for saying you can’t change your gender. But they just signed a guy facing eight felonies and life in prison."

Jon Fraser on X - "“We are everywhere. We have always existed. We need to be supported and cared for and recognized where we are.”  Funny, but I don't recall there being more than two genders growing up. Yes there were gay and lesbians - my aunt was an open lesbian even in the early 70's - but she was a she.  If you want to pretend there are other genders, then fine, but you should not expect others to "support or recognize you". It's no different than someone pretending to be a cat as far as I'm concerned."
Dale Carleton on X - "what should be recognized is dangerous mental health instability society's allowing to grow. where's studies  that show what flips their switch. 🤔why do they expect to be supported cared for when they created their own situations , stop the funding,  promoting their attitudes."

TheFamousArtistBirdyRose on X - "When I see a “trans” flag this is what it represents in my mind:
1. Sterilising children
2. Mutilating children
3. Gay conversation “therapy”
4. “Transing the autism away”
5. “Trans” activists Beating up women
6. Cancelling people’s bank accounts
7. Refusing cancer treatments to non-believers of “trans” ideology
8. “Trans” activists threatening to rape and kill women
9. “Trans” activists stalking and harassing women
10. Efforts to remove the livelihood of anyone who is a non-believer of “trans” ideology.
In other words, I think it is a symbol of religious extremism, terrorism and tyranny. That’s why I’ll never respect it, comply with it or bow down to it."

Traditionally Sarah🇺🇸 on X - "So let me get this straight, hormones make women crazy. Crazy enough to kill three innocent babies and be exonerated of guilt, but prescribing hormones to children who think they’re the opposite gender has no psychological effects whatsoever? Did I get that right?"
So, hormones are dangerous for killer moms but harmless for transitioning kids?
Erin for Parental Rights on X - "Reiterating what many have already said — because it bears repeating… So, hormones can have profound psychological effects on adults… but when we prescribe them to vulnerable & confused kids — they magically become harmless? Make it make sense."

Musician who identified as non-binary 'raped his date as they celebrated New Year's Eve after meeting on Bumble', court hears - "Sab Cox, a biological male, allegedly attacked the woman, a biological female, as they celebrated New Year's Eve on December 31, 2022.   The 26-year-old, who at the time went by the name Sabrina but now uses male pronouns, is accused of raping his date after becoming aggressive and asserting that he was the 'guy' in the relationship, the Old Bailey heard."
Helen Nettleship on X - "Two non-binary people go on a date. The male non-binary person allegedly rapes the female non-binary person. It’s almost as if sex matters"

Is this phrase homophobic? : r/asktransgender - "Hi! I saw someone wearing this hoodie on fb that said “Kill your local pedophile”. I really liked it. I’m the type of person who likes wearing shirts that have bold statements on it. For example, I have a shit that says “Pro Roe 1975, my body my choice”. When I saw the hoodie I bought it right away because I resonate with it in a personal way. After I bought it I was showing a friend and they said that might be homophobic. When I looked it up, a story came up about a Drag Queen reading to kids at a library. When a group of proud boys and white supremacists disturbed the event. One of the men was wearing a shirt with an assault rifle on it, under the riffle it said to”kill your local pedophile”. I’m affraid that if I wear this hoodie in public it would come off in the same way. The shirts look nothing alike except the same saying “kill your local pedophile”. If I wear this shirt will this make me look like an unsafe person for people in the LGBTQ. I don’t wanna offend anyone in the community. I just want to make disgusting men feel uncomfortable around me. Please let me know. I’m so sorry if this offends anyone. Thank you."
Is this phrase homophobic? : r/asktransgender - "Personally I think that wearing any clothing with that particular word emblazoned on it in public is unlikely to be a good idea, regardless of context. Very much opens you up to misunderstandings.  The phrase in itself is not homophobic, but it can very much be read as a dogwhistle, yes. The far right likes equating LGBT people with grooming, so wearing such a shirt might make you very popular with a very hateful group of people, because they think you are sharing their views."

Rita Panahi on X - "Albanese govt want more of this. A tweet stating that men can't breastfeed was deemed so harmful that the eSafety Commissioner had it removed. Thank God @elonmusk has been standing up against this madness."

Rep. Zooey Zephyr on X - "I literally just got out of meetings with members of Congress & used the bathroom on my way out.  Trans women are women—full stop.  We're every bit as "biologically female" as cis women & @SpeakerJohnson 's statement doesn't change the fact that women's spaces include trans women."
Benjamin Ryan on X - "Montana Rep. Zooey Zephyr, a trans woman, asserts a claim that trans cyclist Veronica Ivy made on Trevor Noah’s show: that trans women are “biologically female.” This speaks to the question of the intersection between scientific vs legal definitions of sex and how those definitions either align or conflict with gender identity."
Weird. We keep being told that sex and gender are different and only ignorant people don't know that