Restore Britain is beyond the pale - "To many, questioning whether the King is a white Briton is tantamount to asking whether the Pope is Catholic. Not so, according to Rupert Lowe, the leader of Restore Britain. Today, on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Mr Lowe repeatedly refused to say whether he considered King Charles to be a white Briton. What was the cause of this bizarre evasion? Mr Lowe often quotes a prediction that white Britons will be a minority in the UK by 2063. This is based on a definition of the group that excludes anyone with a parent who was not born in the UK. So absurdly, His Majesty is left out, given that his father was born in Greece. By this logic, Winston Churchill, one of the greatest Britons, would also not make the cut... Charlie Downes, a co-founder of Mr Lowe’s party, posted a disgusting image on social media, which seemed to imply that Nigel Farage had been “bought” by British Jews. Elsewhere he has said that the UK is “defined by indigenous British ancestry and Christian faith”... Mr Downes is not some fringe figure in Restore Britain. He is the party’s campaign director. Trading in anti-Semitic tropes on social media and calling a journalist a “traitor to the British people” is disgraceful and unworthy of frontline politics. Is it really Mr Lowe’s intention to be represented by an extremist and peddler of online hate? Mr Lowe’s refusal to condemn, let alone expel, Mr Downes speaks volumes."
Restore refuses to sack co-founder accused of anti-Semitism - "Restore Britain has refused to sack a co-founder accused of anti-Semitism in order to strike a deal with Reform UK. Rupert Lowe, the Restore leader, said he would not put “a young Christian man out of work” despite Reform ruling out an electoral pact unless he agreed to cut ties with Charlie Downes... Mr Downes appeared to suggest that Nigel Farage, the Reform leader, had been “bought” by Jewish supporters. He also said Israel was committing “genocide” against Palestinians in Gaza, a policy position more commonly held on the Left."
Lowe praised Restore activist who blamed Israel for twin towers - "Frank Wright, a Restore campaigner from Newbury, Berkshire, has been hailed by Mr Lowe as a “good man” despite repeatedly sharing anti-Semitic material online. The Restore Britain leader even lauded a video in which Mr Wright said that Europe’s migration crisis is a consequence of wars in the Middle East “which only serves the grand strategy of the Israelis”... Mr Lowe has refused to sack Mr Downes, saying he would not put “a young Christian man out of work” despite Reform ruling out an electoral pact unless he agreed to cut ties with the activist. Mr Wright has thousands of followers online and liked a comment under one of his blog posts which said that his readers should consider whether liberal democracy was “merely a front for the radical Jewish takeover of the world”. It added: “The revolutionary Jewish movement also produced the current genocidal state of Israel which helped carry out the 9/11 false-flag attacks.”... Mr Wright wrote on multiple occasions about the belief that Israel could have been behind the 2001 terrorist attacks, posting anti-Semitic images about the tragedy and sharing the unsubstantiated claim that 200 Israeli spies were expelled from the US at the time. In one of his articles titled “ABC of Zionism”, he wrote “S is for September 11”, and repeated the claim about the Israeli spies. He has also said that Grant Shapps, the former Tory minister, who is Jewish, “speaks for Israel” because he was the national president of the youth wing of the Jewish group B’nai B’rith as a teenager. He also said that Steven Spielberg, the Jewish film director, was part of a group of billionaires “whose sole purpose was to capture US politics and student culture for Israel”. He has described the “Zionist lobby” as “the most powerful force in the world” and “the number one threat to the freedom of religion, of thought and of speech”... Mr Lowe said: “The Telegraph’s relentless hate campaign against Restore Britain is becoming incredibly tedious. The real enemy is the looming Left-wing alliance, yet The Telegraph spends all day every day attempting to smear me. Is this really the best use of time?”"
Britain’s Jews are right to fear the rise of Restore - "One need not struggle hard to find the stench of anti-Semitism. Mr Lowe was caught on a hot mic mocking a photographer’s “Jewish camera” and Mr Downes responded to a declaration by Reform’s Nigel Farage that he could neither be “bullied” nor “bought” with a photograph of Mr Farage at the launch of Reform’s Jewish supporters’ group... As he memorably told a Jewish podcaster, success means “People like you leaving.” When his interviewer replied “I’m an Englishman,” Mr Laws retorted: “I’m looking at you as a Jew and I’m telling you, you are foreign.”"
Meme - Zia Yusuf @ZiaYusufUK: "Reform will not hesitate to use all available means to defend our border."
Harry Eccles: "FYI, governments should always hesitate. Acting impulsively is not good governance. Please don't let these children anywhere near power."
Harry Eccles: "Since privatisation in 1989, Thames Water has made in profit enriching share holders. That could have been invested rather than syphoned off. Nationalise water. Now."
Harry Eccles @Heccles94: "Palantir are evil. Get them out of everything. Now."
Hesitation is only good when it pushes the left wing agenda
Labour loses one member every eight minutes - "The figure marked Labour’s lowest membership total in 12 years and reflected a torrid year for Sir Keir Starmer that was dominated by scandals and about-turns on policy."
Labour politicians can’t shake their ultimate hypocrisy: private schools - "What is it with Labour politicians and private schools? They rail against what they portray as bastions of elitism, but just can’t help sending their own children there. It rather neatly sums up the party’s unofficial motto: “Do as I say, not as I do.” This week, it emerged that Miatta Fahnbulleh, the newly appointed Energy Secretary, pays £50,000 a year to send her children to private school. Of course, there is nothing wrong with a parent choosing private education. Quite the opposite: parents who do so not only help fund state schools through their taxes, they free up space for another child. Nor should politicians be prohibited from making whatever educational choices they believe are best for their children. In fact, this is a hallmark of a free, civilised society. But when a politician actively supports a policy that makes private education more elitist, while personally continuing to benefit from that same system, the double standard is hard to ignore. Fahnbulleh is a former chief executive of the New Economics Foundation, a social justice think tank, and has built much of her political outlook around tackling inequality, boosting diversity and economic stability. She was educated at a private school reportedly costing around £8,000 a year. She now represents Peckham, where around 40pc of children live in poverty. She was also one of the most prominent advocates of imposing a 20pc tax on private school fees – a policy opponents argue has made independent education unaffordable for thousands of families. Yet she continues to use the private system for her own children... t emerged that 36 Labour MPs who attended private schools had decided not to declare it in the pages of Who’s Who. Fahnbulleh was among them. The list also included John Healey, the new Chancellor, and Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary. James Murray, the financial secretary to the Treasury who attended the £57,000-a-year St Paul’s School in London, also did not have his private education included in his Who’s Who entry. And Anneliese Dodds, a supporter of Labour’s VAT policy, also failed to declare her £21,000-a-year education. Surely they’re not embarrassed? Or perhaps they’re worried about a future tax raid, to be paid retrospectively by those who benefited from a superior education... reducing inequality supposedly sits at the heart of the party’s philosophy. And the contradiction matters because Labour’s justification for the VAT policy is fundamentally about inequality. If the purpose of the policy is to make education “fairer”, it is legitimate to ask whether those who designed and championed it should themselves be willing to accept its consequences... The decision to opt out of the state system is a personal one, but for a politician at the forefront of policy, it is also a public statement. It signals a lack of confidence in the state school system they are tasked with improving – and raises important questions about their confidence in a policy they have promised to fix."
Time for the "yet you participate in society" meme to justify left wing hypocrisy
The Liberal Democrats are bad for Britain - "There is little more dangerous to Britain’s prosperity than a Liberal Democrat MP. For all of the party’s moralistic grandstanding on the national stage about matters of climate change, diplomacy and, for some reason, Fifa, the party proves time and again it is little more than a cover for the selfish, the petty and the tragically short-sighted. While the populist ends of the political spectrum certainly talk a more dangerous game, their relative unpopularity prevents them getting any real handle on power. The Lib Dems, however, with their cuddly, centrist image, frequently get their hands on the levers and have proven remarkably effective at grinding progress to a shuddering halt. They caused real damage to the future growth and productivity of the nation during their five-year spell in coalition government, but it is in local government that their myopic pettifogging truly shines. Roughly half the population of England and Wales is currently subject to a hosepipe ban, with drought declared across more than 70pc of the total landmass... The Abingdon reservoir would probably have rendered a hosepipe ban moot this year, and would have prevented enormous tankers clogging up our roads to transport drinking water. Moran’s aversion long predates these comments, and in more ridiculous fashion. Back in 2018, she admitted that, while campaigning against the reservoir partly on environmental grounds, she was unaware that the reservoir would, in fact, have many benefits for the local and national environment – from new natural habitats to the protection of precious chalk streams. She had also complained about the size of the reservoir, while claiming “we all love Didcot power station”, the sort of large, growth-engendering structure that is anathema to her politics. Let’s not forget, this reservoir would also have supported the construction of thousands of new homes in the Oxford-Cambridge Growth Corridor. A lack of water infrastructure was explicitly raised as a blocker to the level of prosperity such a proposal could achieve during a conference I attended earlier this year. At that event, Irene Tracey, the vice-chancellor of the University of Oxford, defined the core issue as a “deep culture of anti-growth in the UK” – and, if you ask me, the Lib Dems are the chief cheerleaders. But of course, Moran is not unique in her disregard for the future. A more successful Lib Dem leadership hopeful has spent longer eating his words. Back in 2010, the first and only Lib Dem leader to enter Downing Street was busy proving he couldn’t see past his own nose. In the same year his party condemned the country to a fantastically costly burden in the form of the triple lock on state pensions, Nick Clegg simultaneously damned the nation to ruinously expensive energy bills. He said: “By the most optimistic scenarios from the Government itself, there’s no way they’re going to have new nuclear come on stream until about 2021, 2022. So it’s just not even an answer.” I don’t know about you, but here in 2026, I’d be pretty happy with some four-year-old nuclear power stations reducing our reliance on foreign imports of gas and intermittent renewables. I’d have been overjoyed with it in 2022 as we faced the worst energy crisis in a generation. This lack of political imagination, this inability to see beyond the next election cycle, is precisely what has landed us in the mess we’re in. No new reservoirs have been built in more than three decades, and we have a dearth of clean, safe, reliable energy. Lib Dem constituencies across the land continually fight to prevent the vital improvement of the infrastructure of our national grid, with their demands to bury all transmission lines under the ground, which comes at an obscene price compared with the proven and simple method of pylons. What rankles most about these middle-class eco-warriors is their hypocrisy. They spend their days smugly proclaiming their love for the planet, their love for the less fortunate, their righteous cause – yet each and every day fight tooth and nail to prevent the very progress that would alleviate these issues."
Ed Miliband is the most tragic kind of overgrown student politician - "“Speak softly and carry a big stick” – that was the art of diplomacy according to Theodore Roosevelt. “Speak aggressively and carry a tiny stick” – that’s the new version according to Ed Miliband. The Foreign Secretary this week waded in over a controversial new settlement in the West Bank. Israel wants to build 1,200 homes there. Miliband called it an “unacceptable and destructive act”... In their gilt-lined bubbles, the Milibands can afford to stick with the student politics of their Oxford years and never be mugged by reality. And Ed has extra insulation from the necessities of realpolitik. It seems he was made Foreign Secretary by Andy Burnham as a sop for not getting his coveted job as chancellor – where his student politics would have brought even more carnage. And so, in return for not kicking up a fuss at not getting what he wanted, he can defy the conventions of diplomacy. Miliband’s politics are a version of what Kingsley Amis called “how it will go down at the club”. Instead of thinking about the general public, this type of person wonders how his ideas will go down “in the circle of his colleagues, his friends in the profession, certain critics and a more or less specialised and expert section of the public”."
Labour-run Islington council proposes traveller pitches over housing - "A Labour-run council is proposing to build new traveller pitches instead of social housing, The Telegraph can disclose. Islington council, in north London, has published proposals to use 71 Ronalds Road for up to three new pitches – land allocated to individual families that will form a wider traveller site. But the authority faces a backlash from residents because in 2017 it had pledged to use the site to build a community centre and council homes."
Ben Graham on X - "Dale Vince, who has ploughed millions into Labour, funded independent candidate Count Binface to the tune of £180,000 for the Clacton by-election. Meanwhile, Conservatives were out canvassing for Binface. The uniparty really is something. And the end result? Nigel Farage got more votes than he did at the 2024 General Election."
Labour peer claims Reform is ‘building next road to Auschwitz’ - "Lord Sikka appeared to liken Nigel Farage’s party to the Nazis in a post sent from his BlueSky account in response to Reform’s housing policy. The post said: “Reform says it would put foreign-born UK citizens lower on social housing list (sic). Couples with a foreign-born partner will face discrimination. “Children of UK citizens will be denied social housing because one parent was born abroad. They don’t hide racism. Reform [is] building the next road to Auschwitz.”... Reform’s plan for the biggest shake-up of social housing in a generation would prioritise young British married working couples with children, along with military veterans. Foreign-born nationals would be evicted from council homes after being given three months to find alternative accommodation under the proposals. Lee Anderson, the Reform chairman, has written to Lord Kennedy, the Labour chief whip in the Lords, to express “grave concern” about Lord Sikka’s post. Mr Anderson said: “Members of the House of Lords are very much held in high regard and they should absolutely be held accountable for their words and actions. “Given the recent rise in political attacks, in particular on Reform UK figures, including the recent murder of Ann Widdecombe, I hope you will take swift and decisive action in relation to the matter I raise with you.”... An analysis of social media posts by Lord Sikka, who became a peer in 2020, shows that it is the sixth time he has accused Reform of seeking to build “the next road to Auschwitz”... Lord Sikka’s remarks are not the first time that a senior Labour figure has come under fire for attempting to invoke the Nazis in relation to Reform and Mr Farage. At last year’s Labour conference, David Lammy, the then deputy prime minister, was forced to row back on his claim that Mr Farage “once flirted with the Hitler Youth”. He repeated allegations that the Reform leader marched through a village “shouting Hitler Youth songs” while a schoolboy. Mr Farage has always denied the claims, which stem from a 1981 letter from one of his schoolteachers and were first made more than a decade ago... During his suspension from Labour last year, John McDonnell, who has since had the whip restored, likened Mr Farage to Adolf Hitler and called Reform a “fascist organisation”. Speaking at a fringe event at the Trades Union Congress conference, Mr McDonnell said: “Reform are a proto-fascist organisation. We’ve seen it in the ‘30s. “What they do, they have a demagogue speaking for them, they target a particular group, in the thirties in Germany it would have been the Jews, here it is asylum seekers.”"
Terrified of Farage, Labour might be planning an almighty electoral gamble - "Labour did well out of the first-past-the-post system two years ago. Despite winning just 34 per cent of the vote across the UK, it secured 63 per cent of the seats – enough for an overall majority of 174. So why might nearly 100 Labour MPs be pressing for the Government to commit itself next week to the creation of a commission on electoral reform – with a view to including a pledge in Labour’s next manifesto to switch to proportional representation? After all, Labour would have been well short of the 326 seats needed for a Commons majority if the 2024 election had been held under any of the likely alternatives. In part, the move is a legacy of Labour’s 14 years in the wilderness between 2010 and 2024. During that time, many in the party came to doubt whether it would ever again be able to win an overall majority under a first-past-the-post system that had seemingly come to be biased against it. Better then perhaps to switch to a system that would make it difficult for the Tories to win a majority too... The long-lauded “winners’ bonus” under first-past-the-post from which Labour had profited in 2024 no longer looked so attractive to Labour MPs horrified at the prospect of Nigel Farage walking triumphantly through the front door of 10 Downing St. Proportional representation, in contrast, would make it impossible for Reform (or anybody else) to win a majority on 30 per cent. Instead, it would open up the possibility that between them Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Greens and the nationalist parties would have enough seats between them to keep Reform out of power."
Elites will stop at nothing to thwart the electorate
Keir Starmer on X - "It has been an honour and a privilege to represent Holborn and St Pancras for the last 11 years. My statement."
Zarah Sultana MP on X - "You’re a war criminal."
Left wingers get more deranged daily
Labour is obsessed with identity politics, says Red Wall MP - "Jonathan Hinder, the MP for Pendle and Clitheroe, also said the party had too often accused voters who expressed concerns about migration of being racist."
Polanski faces questions over claims his family fled the Holocaust - "Zack Polanski’s tale of ancestral migration from Europe has faced questions after it emerged all four of his grandparents were born in Britain. Speaking at the Green Party conference last October, the Green Party leader said he was proud of his Jewish heritage and told party members his ancestors had “faced the Nazis” in Poland before arriving in England. However, Mr Polanski’s recent ancestors were reportedly all in Britain before the Second World War, which raises the question of which of them fled the Nazi regime. He said: “I am literally the product of migration. It’s why defending migrants matters so much to me... Public records of births, marriages and deaths confirm Mr Polanski’s great and great-great-grandparents came from Latvia and Russia, which Mr Polanski has previously said. However, historical census records from 1891, 1901 and other public resources, suggest they settled in the UK in the late 19th and 20th centuries. His four grandparents all come from the north of England and both his parents were born in Manchester... A Green Party spokesman said: “Jewish family history is often confusing and muddled, as Zack has acknowledged. It’s astonishing that the only current Jewish leader of a British political party is having his family history raked over by the press in an attempt to discredit him.”"
Terrorism supporters lie about everything, so
It's rich for them to accuse those who point out the truth of anti-Semitism, when they are so anti-Semitic themselves
Jews are to blame for rising anti-Semitism, suggests Polanski - "The Green Party has faced increasing accusations of anti-Semitism since Mr Polanski became leader. In April, two Green local election candidates were arrested on suspicion of stirring up racial hatred for allegedly posting anti-Semitic comments online. The Telegraph revealed that almost 20 Green candidates had posted offensive material, including one who referred to Jewish people as “cockroaches”. Other hopefuls expressed support for Palestine Action, the banned terror group."
Good luck if you blame Muslims for "Islamophobia"
The Jewish Chronicle on X - "Chair of Amnesty leaves Green Party over ‘antisemitic motion’"
Rachel Moiselle on X - "The Greens lost Amnesty. I repeat: the Greens lost Amnesty."
Letters: Reform UK can no longer simply be dismissed as a protest party - "Angela Rayner, the Housing Secretary, and Lord Blunkett have described the two £36m donations to Reform UK from Christopher Harborne and Ben Delo as “anti-democratic”. Ben Delo has explained his reasons (Comment, September 12), but, as it doesn’t suit Ms Rayner and Lord Blunkett to understand them, they never will. Far from being anti-democratic, these donations support democracy by seeking to establish a more level playing field. This terrifies Labour, and perhaps the Conservatives, too. Ms Rayner should look closer to home for undemocratic behaviour. Not only has Labour installed as Prime Minister a man whose democratic mandate comes from the single constituency of Makerfield, but the party is also seeking to overturn step by step the result of the 2016 EU referendum – against pledges made at the 2024 election – and hoping that no one will notice. If Labour wishes to continue this political strategy, it should call a general election with a view to securing a proper mandate."
Burnham lifted policies from Starmer survival plan - "Andy Burnham has borrowed extensively from Sir Keir Starmer’s plan to cling on to power despite pledging a “new path for Britain”, leaked documents have revealed. A 50-page dossier of Sir Keir’s policy proposals for the rest of the year shows he intended to pursue fiscal devolution for mayors, discounted transport and support for energy bills, all of which Mr Burnham has announced since taking office. The leak suggests that many of the Prime Minister’s most radical plans were already under way in Downing Street before he took over, rather than forming part of the “turning point” he had promised voters."
Protesters ‘attack Restore campaigner with scalding coffee’ - "A Restore Britain canvasser was punched while handing out leaflets in Camden, police have said. A woman was arrested on suspicion of assault and placed in custody, police said, after a group of 30 Stand Up To Racism protesters clashed with a dozen Restore canvassers on Saturday morning. The Stand Up To Racism gathered in the London constituency of Holborn and St Pancras as part of a planned protest to disrupt Restore Britain’s by-election canvassing. Rupert Lowe, the Restore leader, wrote in a post on X: “Our Restore Britain team campaigning in Holborn & St Pancras this morning has been attacked by ‘anti-racist’ protestors. “One member of our campaign team is in hospital being treated now, the police are involved.” He added: “I assume all those politicians who spent the other weekend screaming for police action over a perfectly peaceful protest in Dover against illegal migrants will be publicly condemning the ‘anti-racist’ mob violence against Restore Britain activists in London today?” However, Lewis Nielson from Stand Up To Racism, told The Telegraph: “If you look at our videos you’ll see that our crowd was mainly young women confronting big burly blokes, some of whom have been in neo-Nazi fascist terror organisations. “The idea that these women went and beat up these big blokes is laughable.”"
Proof that Restore and Reform need to be banned for inciting violence!
Clearly, the police are all "far right" for arresting a young woman "confronting big burly blokes" and need to be purged of fascism sympathisers
The Free Speech Union on X - "It is deeply shocking that a Conservative councillor thought he could use West Midlands Police as his personal tool to silence comments he disliked about himself — especially when they were made by a 15-year-old child. More shocking still is that West Midlands Police investigated and arrested the child. This is not an isolated case: the force has a record of zealously acting on complaints about “hurty words” online. Calling someone a “rent boy” may be personally offensive to the councillor, but it is not a hate crime. We are in the UK, not North Korea. Politicians must not be able to use the police to silence people who insult them. This is a blatant abuse of power — an assault on both free speech and democracy."
The government is keeping a list of people who question their policies - "Negative X and Reddit posts from unsuspecting Brits attacking the UK’s anti-terror programme Prevent were added to a database of critical online comments. Metro has obtained a list of nearly 80 critical posts found and logged by the Standards and Compliance Unit (StaCU), which oversees Prevent, between March 2024 and February 2025. One campaign group whose tweet was recorded in the database said the revelations raised ‘serious questions about freedom of expression and the right to dissent and protest’ in the UK. Jacob Smith, who fought for a year to get the Home Office to publish the information, said: ‘You should be allowed to criticise government policy without being put on a list.’ StaCU is an ‘opaque’ body set up in February 2024 to address and investigate complaints about Prevent, the safeguarding programme designed to stop people becoming terrorists. As well as processing reports made directly to the unit, officials appear to be actively scouring the net for critical posts about Prevent. Freedom of Information requests – seen exclusively by Metro – have revealed the 77 negative online comments logged by StaCU. Many of these posts came from ordinary Brits who wouldn’t suspect that government officials would be looking at their feeds. A large number of the investigated comments are claims that Prevent is ‘biased’ in how it trains public sector staff to spot the early signs of radicalisation. One X user ended up on the list because after they claimed they called the training ‘complete bullshit’. They complained: ‘Anyone’s who done the prevent training knows it only talks about the far right. Islam extremism isn’t even mentioned.’ Another poster complained that they ‘sat through Prevent training at work… and the narrative was very much that the far right is the biggest threat’. They added: ‘I kid you not!’ While many claims relate to claims that Prevent is overly focused on right-wing extremism, other posts investigated by StaCU are negative about the government in different ways... Their Programme Manager for Pre-Crime, Sarah Lasoye, told Metro: ‘Prevent has expanded far beyond its stated aim of identifying people considered “vulnerable to radicalisation”, and has increasingly been used to justify extensive surveillance. ‘It is deeply concerning to see the Prevent duty being used to enable the monitoring of people and organisations simply because they are critical of the programme. That raises serious questions about freedom of expression and the right to dissent and protest. ‘There is also a troubling lack of transparency about what happens to the information gathered through this social media monitoring: how long it is retained, who it is shared with, and ultimately what the government is using it for.’... The Home Office fought for more than a year not to disclose their ‘database’ of critical X and Reddit posts... Smith, Freedom of Expression and Belief Team Leader at the human rights group, told Metro: ‘People should be able to express their views on social media without that being catalogued in government databases. ‘You should be allowed to criticise government policy without being put on a list.’ Rights & Security International are concerned about the Home Office’s ‘resistance to disclosing this information’ and want to know ‘who has access to’ it... The Campaign Against Antisemitism also had one of their posts added to the database of critical comments. Their Tweet does not mention Prevent by name but criticised a Hezbollah vigil, designated a terrorist group in the UK, allegedly not being taken seriously by police officers. A spokesperson for Campaign Against Antisemitism said: ‘We aren’t sure whether to be flattered or concerned that StaCU has picked up a post of ours. ‘If it’s because we’ve dared to be critical of law enforcement’s lax attitude toward Islamist extremism in this country, we stand by what we said and would reiterate it for as long as it takes to bring about change. "
Left wingers still complain that Prevent doesn't care about the "far right", because it doesn't jail anyone with an opinion to the right of the far left
Meme - Bradford Green Party: ""There should be no street, no neighbourhood and no place in this country where you can't live your life in peace." @MothinAli calls for an equal right to exist and belong in his Green Party Conference speech."
H.K. Uber. @ @Moriartys..:-"Smashing, so me, my partner & our pet dog would be welcome on any street in Bradford ?"
"@bradfordgreens has blocked you. You can view public posts from @bradfordgreens, but you are blocked from engaging with them. You also cannot follow or message @bradfordgreens."
Islamoleftism strikes again!
