How USAID Built a Global Color Revolution Infrastructure With NGOs

This is why left wingers are so upset about USAID

DataRepublican (small r) on X

"How USAID Built a Global Color Revolution Infrastructure With NGOs...

The right points to USAID grants for transgender operas in Colombia and DEI workshops in Serbia and asks why American taxpayers were funding them. The left points to children who depended on foreign aid claims millions of deaths.

 

But both miss the purpose of true USAID.

 

USAID was one of Washington's primary instruments for regime change abroad. Beneath the humanitarian programs, the cultural initiatives, and the development projects sat a much larger objective: managing regime change and color revolutions across the globe.

 

Which raises an obvious question:

 

What does a transgender opera in Colombia have to do with regime change?...

 

1. Media. Independent outlets. Journalism training, equipment, institutional funding so a newsroom can survive without depending on the local government or corporations for revenue. The function is to ensure that there is an “independent” outlet ready to broadcast Western narratives. You need a megaphone before you propagate a message.

 

2. Legal infrastructure. Lawyers, legal aid clinics, rule-of-law programs, judicial reform advocacy. The function is to build a class of professionals who know how to challenge a government through its own legal system — and who have the institutional backing to survive doing it. And, yes, build a judiciary that shares the values of liberal Western democracy.

 

3. Election monitoring. Observer training, voter roll modernization, parallel vote tabulation (PVT). PVT is the critical technology: an “independent” count run alongside the official one. Without PVT data, people claiming a stolen election are sore losers. With Western-backed election monitoring, they're defenders of liberal democracy.

 

4. Activist training. Civic engagement workshops, youth leadership programs, community organizing. The grant descriptions say "civic engagement" and "leadership development." The skills being transferred:

• How to organize a protest
• How to sustain a protest
• How to train others to do the same
• How to communicate with media
• “Nonviolent” discipline under pressure and training.

The result is a trained cadre of people who know how to convert public anger into sustained political pressure across multiple election cycles.

 

5. Governance data. Procurement monitoring, FOIA programs, budget transparency initiatives, anti-corruption databases. These organizations generate the raw material that the media reports on, the lawyers cite in court, and the election monitors reference in their findings. Without this layer, the other four operate on anecdote. With it, they operate on evidence.

 

None of these looks like regime change in isolation. A journalism training program is a journalism training program. The system becomes visible only when you fund all five in the same country for a decade and the people running them all know each other because you trained them at the same conferences, connected them through the same fellowship programs, and funded them through the same grant pipelines.

What the Completed System Looks Like: Georgia

Georgia is the country where the full pipeline played out in public, so Georgia is where you can trace it.

Starting in the mid-1990s, American and European money built all five capabilities inside Georgian civil society. USAID and the Eurasia Foundation funded Rustavi 2, an independent broadcaster that became the opposition's primary media outlet by 2003. The Liberty Institute, founded in 1996, drafted Georgia's freedom of speech legislation and ran anti-corruption campaigns. ISFED, founded in 1995 with USAID and NED money, trained 3,000 election observers and ran parallel vote tabulation across ten Georgian elections. NED spent $3 million on Otpor in Serbia, whose trainers then came to Georgia — funded by Open Society, facilitated by Liberty Institute — and trained a student group called Kmara. Same playbook, same clenched-fist logo, different country. And organizations like IDFI monitored government procurement, generating the data everybody else used.

 

Open Society's own Georgia staff described the scale in a video: "We have been out there, helping every startup in Georgia, almost every organization that came to us with new ideas... There were 16,000 projects supported by the foundation."

 

Read that again. Sixteen thousand projects in a country of 3.7 million people.

 

In November 2003, all five fired at once. ISFED's parallel vote count proved the parliamentary election was fraudulent. Rustavi 2 broadcast the evidence. Kmara filled the streets. Liberty Institute provided the organizational backbone. Three weeks later, President Shevardnadze resigned in the Rose Revolution.

 

The activation was emergent. Every node in the network activated and performed its designed function simultaneously.

 

After the revolution, Liberty Institute members entered the Georgian government: Bokeria to the National Security Council, Subari as Public Defender, Targamadze to the Defense and Security Committee, Vardzelashvili as Deputy Justice Minister, Zhvania to Foreign Intelligence, and Minashvili as Foreign Affairs Committee Chair. The organizations didn't just support a transition. They staffed it.

 

USASpending.gov shows over a billion in USAID awards to Georgia from 2008 to 2025. The contract descriptions spell it out: CEPPS received $26 million for "Georgia Elections and Political Processes Activity."East-West Management Institute got $21 million for "build and innovate upon PAST USAID investments in the rule of law." That one is the pipeline describing itself — build on what we already built.

 

Twenty years later, the Georgian government proposed a law requiring NGOs to disclose their foreign funding. The same network activated: foreign-funded NGOs sustained protests across multiple waves, hundreds of thousands in the streets. Former U.S. Ambassador Ian Kelly explained the dependency on camera: "The civil society is the absolute beating heart of Georgian democracy... it relies quite a bit on EU and U.S. funding."

 

The Georgian government's response was blunt: foreign-funded NGOs organized the 2003 color revolution, and the same infrastructure activated again when the government tried to make them disclose who was paying.

 

If this is starting to sound familiar, good. It should.

Now Look at the United States

The same five capabilities exist domestically. The language softens — "election observation" becomes "election protection," "civil society training" becomes "civic engagement," "independent media" becomes "local civic journalism" — but the functional categories are identical. The funding source shifts from USAID to private foundations. The scale is larger.

 

1. Media. The Knight Foundation gave $25 million to the American Journalism Project, which it

described as a "first-of-its-kind venture philanthropy organization focused on growing and sustaining independent, nonpartisan, local civic news." AJP has distributed millions in smaller grants. MacArthur

gave Howard University $5 million for a "Center for Journalism and Democracy."

2. Legal infrastructure. The Brennan Center for Justice — mission statement: "nonpartisan law and policy institute that seeks to improve the American systems of democracy and justice." The Hopewell Fund, an Arabella Advisors fiscal sponsor, hosts Democracy Docket — Marc Elias's election litigation operation — as one of its many fiscally sponsored projects. The domestic legal infrastructure shapes the legal environment from the outside through litigation, judicial training, and model legislation that state legislatures adopt.

 

3. Election monitoring. The Voter Registration Project runs $40+ million per year on private donations. Its grantee, State Voices, coordinates over 700 organizations in 24 states, providing "cutting-edge organizing technology and experimentation access." The Foundation to Promote Open Society gave the Hopewell Fund $10 million in 2023 for a "Nonpartisan Free Election Fund." The Election Trust Initiative launched with $25 million from Hewlett, Peterson, and Klarman foundations — and files no independent public returns because its finances are buried inside Pew's 990. Domestically, 700 coordinated organizations across 24 states provide poll monitoring, voter verification, and legal rapid response. 

 

4. Activist training. The Alliance for Youth Organizing runs programs on over 200 college campuses. Its 990 describes "local, integrated civic engagement programs that help train and develop new leaders, register and mobilize young voters, and educate young people about key issues in their communities. Our program engages with young people year-round and over multiple cycles, building habits that translate into lifelong civic engagement." Open Society Action Fund spends tens of millions on domestic civic engagement grants. The capability is identical as Georgia: a trained cadre who know how to organize, mobilize, and sustain political pressure across multiple election cycles.

 

5. Governance data. Open Society Action Fund's 2023 IRS 990 lists its domestic program areas: "DEMOCRACY DEFENSE, VOTING RIGHTS, ELECTION INTEGRITY, CENSUS, REDISTRICTING, ECONOMIC SECURITY... COMBATTING MIS- AND DISINFORMATION, TECHNOLOGY AND CIVIL RIGHTS... GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY." Domestic program expense: $173 million.

 

Those are NED's foreign democracy categories — democracy defense, election integrity, government accountability and transparency, combatting disinformation — applied domestically, word for word.

The Recognition

Seven right-wing candidates won in Latin America after the funding stopped. The infrastructure that had been cultivated for decades began to weaken because its primary source of capital disappeared. The newspapers survived only if they could find new donors. The NGOs shrank.

 

That is what people misunderstand when they argue about whether USAID funded transgender operas, journalism workshops, anti-corruption databases, youth leadership programs, or election observers.

 

Those were never the point.

 

The point was the network.

A grant to a newspaper is not a newspaper. A grant to an activist group is not an activist group. A grant to an election-monitoring organization is not an election-monitoring organization. Fund enough of them for long enough, connect them to one another, train their leaders together, give them shared sources of funding, shared language, shared objectives, and eventually they become a political operating system.

 

At that stage, individual grants no longer matter. The system reproduces itself.

Georgia shows what the completed architecture looks like. The organizations did not merely criticize the government. They generated information, trained activists, shaped public opinion, challenged institutions, mobilized voters, and ultimately supplied personnel for the government that followed.

 

The architecture was the product.

 

And once you recognize the architecture, you start seeing it everywhere.

 

Even in the United States.

 

Especially in the United States.

 

That is why we see a major nationwide protest every month as long as President Trump is in office."

Links - 14th November 2026 (1 - Women [including Shane Gillis])

Loki on X - "So an American comedian named Shane Gillis went on SNL and said women dress like whores in the gym, he was referring to women that wear nothing but compression shorts (you know the ones that show the shape of the sandwich) and sports bras. To teach him a lesson, thousands of women are now making social media posts of themselves wearing exactly that, while talking about him. Basically, they’ve launched the biggest “sex sells” PR campaign imaginable, giving him free publicity while advertising the very thing he was criticising. All in an attempt to teach him a lesson. 😂 Maybe he should say women don’t cook next, hopefully that works just as good as this one too 🤣"

Melissa Chen on X - "The outrage over Shane Gillis’s gym joke recalls the backlash Jordan Peterson faced thanks to a 2018 Vice interview where he pointed out that women wear makeup and high heels at work as sexual displays. The Professor was ahead of his time and showed what it's like when a reflexive low-IQ lefty refuses to engage with reality in order to preserve his bubble of ideological safety. In both these incidents, you have someone observing (or joking about) women's deliberate sexual signaling in mixed sex spaces, and instead of examining the signaling, the biology, or the inconsistent rules, the reflexive response was to treat that truthful observation itself as the offense. Our choices in clothing and cosmetics have aesthetic, evolutionary, social and sexual functions. Yet modern feminists like to pretend the sexual component is absent or irrelevant. Both controversies highlight how hypocritical things are because on one hand, female sexual presentation is common and in fact, ENCOURAGED, yet male visual attention or commentary is pathologized. Peterson’s broader point was that post-sexual-revolution and #MeToo environments demand male restraint and “enthusiastic consent” protocols while refusing to discuss female signaling, hypergamy, or the biological asymmetry in visual arousal. Reaction to Gillis’s banal joke reveals the same double standard at play. Both women (and men) deliberately dress and behave in ways that maximize sexual attention, status, or mate-value signaling. Remember when second wave feminists used to own the "I’m a 'ho" energy? Pepperidge Farm remembers. Back then, dressing sexy or slutty was treated as straightforward empowerment and self-expression. Today’s third wave feminism is in denial about the biological realities of sexual signaling, and then piles shrill emotional moralizing on top of the dishonesty. Dr. @jordanbpeterson argued that once traditional sexual norms are dismantled without replacement, mixed environments become minefields. Women still engage in sexual display, but men are punished for acknowledging it, and the rules governing behavior are written in moral language that defines male behavior as toxic by default. This will keep happening until one side stops pretending that signaling and biology don’t exist."

drew on X - "Genuinely confused about the reaction this Shane Gillis monologue is getting. No one can seriously be that upset about this"
Katie Campione on X - "We are in the middle of one of the largest nationwide reckonings with sexual assault ever and this guy gets on stage and calls women whores for wearing shorts at the gym? You think he doesn’t know what he is saying? It’s not only unoriginal and unfunny, it’s really disgusting."
Wilfred Reilly on X - "The funny thing is that this is ALL fake. The Cornell 7 thing turned out to be scuzzy on all sides, but no kind of prosecutable rape. The other #NewMeToo cases ("62 million man rape academy") ALL fell apart or duly ended with the men in jail. Gillis didn't say women ARE working prostitutes: he said they dress slutty in mixed gyms - an innocuous Chapelle's Show joke. Almost all left wing modern rage boils down to this. "How can you ignore Michael Brown, and Freddie Gray, and Rayshard Brooks, and Trayvon Martin, and Kyle Rittenhouse, and Pretti/Good, and the Duke Lacrosse rape, and the Chi Phi 7 hour rape, and the Rolling Stone rape, and the Rape Academy, and Yasmin Seweid, and Jussie Smolliet, and Covington Catholic, and Air Force Academy, and the dozen lynchings?" Because either almost every one of literally every one of those cases was bullshit. The goal is presenting such a mass of angry text to the world that good faith people think there must be something there. But, there really isn't."

Bridget Phetasy on X - "Shane Gillis goading thousands of women into tagging him in their half-naked selfies is elite tier."

Allie ✞ on X - "On gym attire: There is an innate fantasy women have that goes like this: I am super duper pretty and everyone notices and loves me for this, but also this attention and power come with zero further implications or downsides The fantasy is one thing, being frustrated it isn't reality is another Most girls grow out of this as part of normal development (and you should! it's not realistic), learning that large amounts of attention and affection from, say, your dad, are freely given ....but that same kind of attention from strangers comes with strings attached Posting bikini pics that get 10M likes means you have a lot of men saving them for...gross reasons Going to the gym wearing next to nothing is attention grabbing for a reason, and you don't get to decide whose attention it grabs or the nature of that attention It's a bit of a black pill, and you tend to (or, should) figure it out somewhere in your teens: strange men do not want to adore and dote on you for zero reason To be clear, negative attention can happen even when you aren't doing something specifically out of the ordinary Getting catcalled often happens in the most normal outfits - it's just the flip side of being young and pretty The issue is this has evolved into almost an ideology: rather than recognizing the reality that attention is a double-edged sword, there's an impulse to regulate the attention i.e. "You can only notice me in the ways I want" You become like the dog meme below, saying "No sexual thoughts, only attention" Unfortunately for its advocates, this line of thinking is waging war with reality itself"

Hi on X - ""strange men do not want to adore and dote on you for zero reason" I legitimately don't understand what reason women have in their minds as to why showing off their bodies garners so much male attention? Do they think its some mechanical fascination with female proportions?"
Allie ✞ on X - " I'll do my best to explain it but you have to grant that we just...are that way by default. Our assumption is that we are, by default, worthy of attention and adoration. Men aren't like this - men assume they are loved for what they do/achieve/provide - everyone can blackpill about the difference if you want but I see no reason to ascribe moral weight to it. ANYWAYS this default setting is healthy if (and reinforced when) that attention and adoration are coming from a dad, but your brain doesn't automatically recalibrate when it's not. We are then raised on princess movies where everyone adores the princess because she is pretty. Think about it: Prince Charming is not trying to sleep with Cinderella. He also doesn't love her for her intellect, they barely speak the whole movie. She. Is. Just. Pretty. Cinderella is one such example but this is reinforced by virtually every form of young girls' media. Partly because it sells, partly because the desire to be loved manifests itself this way naturally in girls. So we learn to connect "people look at me and like the way I look" with "I am worthy". Because women are used to being loved for what we are and not what we provide/produce, we have no instinct to search for "What does this man see in me?" ...and this gets dangerous once you outgrow princess dresses, because when you try on your first too-short skirt and realize the attention ramps up, you have no mental emergency brake for what's happening. Your dad should, and in a healthy dynamic does, by saying "You are not leaving the house in that". But if for whatever reason that doesn't happen, you just keep on thinking that you are getting rightful attention and adoration by dressing pretty. And it IS pretty. Even to women, we like the look of short skirts, heels, etc. Not for sexual reasons, but there's a reason that's what Barbies wear. It's feminine and pretty! But I digress. This is a long-winded way of saying: it is not natural for a woman to ask "Why is he giving me attention?" that is a skill we need to learn and, more specifically, need to be taught by either someone who cares about us or by life experience"
Too bad dads saying "you are not leaving the house in that" is considered sexist and misogynistic nowadays

Allie ✞ on X - ""Screw clothes at the gym, bring back hot people!!!!" I regret to inform this crowd that the monkey paw is going to curl. 70% of the US is overweight or obese. This will not result in gyms full of sweat-misted models, it will be your local Walmart with less clothing"
Michael Druggan on X - "You can avoid this by going to an expensive gym. The gym I go to on San Diego is $150/mo and almost everyone there is in good shape because people who aren't serious about fitness don't want to pay that much."

🎃🍁 Pumpkin Spice Sand 🏈☕️ on X - "My 2 cents: The only women I’ve ever seen go to the gym in skimpy outfits are mostly influencers. When I go the gym (I try to go 2 - 3x a week) and I’ve never seen the women there in booty shorts (unless you count bike shorts as booty shorts) or pants w the weird butt things... The gym I go to (the Y) has a dress code and I have to assume that the gyms these people go to probably doesn’t. 🤷‍♀️"

Lupe Macias | Facebook - "The seam on your shorts doesn't need to touch your butthole. Your ass cheeks don't need to be hanging out. Underboob doesn't give you any advantage, and your tits don't need to be popping out, showing areolas, to lift. That being said, MEN SHOULDN'T gaze, make inappropriate comments, advances, or assumptions if you do. It was a joke about the current state of gym culture. A joke could also be made about sporting commercials. I can't watch a game without seeing Sweeney naked, covering up with balls all over my screen, or Fox selling boner pills. Women really want to stop being treated like "whores," AS THEY SHOULD AND DESERVE. But unfortunately, there are bad apples that rot the entire group, just like bad cops, bad teachers, and the absolute worst politicians. I could go on and on. And unfortunately, I can scroll down my feed and give you more bad examples of women objectifying themselves for clicks and views than actual gym tutorials with women wearing more clothing doing actual workouts. And I get how algorithms work but even when looking up specific creators the follwer/view count clearly shows what is being pushed So, until this social media obsession with clicks and views, and the need to be monetized for doing everyday things, runs its course—which is its own epidemic—unfortunately, change will be difficult. We reward this every time we interact with content promoting such behavior that does nothing more than divide. We made people popular and it inspired others to pursue the same dream. Let's make one thing clear. I'm not saying that every woman who wears revealing clothing to the gym is objectifying herself or seeking attention. I'm talking specifically about the content I see on social media every single day. Women posting videos in extremely revealing gym clothes, supposedly demonstrating workouts, yet there's no discussion of the routine, no explanation of proper form, and often not even a camera angle that allows viewers to see whether the exercise is being performed correctly. So what exactly is the purpose of the video? If the focus isn't on the workout, the technique, or educating the viewer, but instead on highlighting certain body parts, I think it's perfectly reasonable to question whether the content is actually about fitness or simply using fitness as a backdrop to attract views and engagement. And that's my point. There's a difference between wearing what makes you comfortable at the gym and deliberately creating sexualized content under the guise of fitness. And it is those women on social media making such content that put a spot light on the matter That still doesn't give anyone the right to harass, disrespect, or make inappropriate advances toward women. Those are two separate issues, and both can be discussed without excusing either behavior."

Ian Kennedy on X - "Wish it didn’t need to be said over and over. Women are not a joke, not a punchline. Women’s bodies, and the clothing women choose to wear are not topics for men to debate or criticize. Not on a stage, not in private."
Lisa Britton on X - "Apparently men shouldn’t criticize women at all, on a stage or in private. But women criticize men all the time! About everything—their bodies, bank accounts, style, everything! If women’s bodies and the clothing they choose to wear are not topics for men to debate or criticize, then women shouldn’t criticize men either, no?"

Tadhg Mac an Chalbhaigh 🇮🇪 on X - "I've been going to gyms in Ireland on and off for 15 years. There are far more women in gyms now, and it's not even close. Yes, they've gone from dressing sensibly to dressing in gym bikinis and full face make-up (like whores). It's not misogyny to describe a real phenomenon."
Dvorstone on X - "Okay, I guess I will explain the "gym whore" issue. In short, gyms are a less-crass Instagram. It's a way of showing off their bodies to strangers for attention, while maintaining plausible deniability:
1. Women are psychologically more inclined to like attention.
2. Using sex for attention is arguably the most common manifestation of that.
3. The traditional purpose of this was to get a husband.
4. Today, the purpose is ego-validation and/or money via social media or OnlyFans (or similar way of monetizing their sexual aesthetics).
5. Gyms are a place where women can show off their bodies without being flagrant about it.
They've been relying on "plausible deniability" and now they just got called out for it, which is why they're so upset."

Meghan Murphy | Facebook - "No one is actually paying that much attention to you. You aren’t being harassed on the daily. All attractive women know this, because we have all spent our lives moving about the world from the time we were teenagers, and we are aware that actual sexual harassment is not really as common as melodramatic liberal feminists pretend it is. Most men are reasonably polite and normal people. Some are weirdo creeps and public perverts, I know. But they are far less common than the masses of normals who keep their thoughts inside their heads and don’t feel inclined towards criminal or intimidating behaviour. The fact that legions of women used Gillis’ monologue and their fake-rage response to post photos of their asses on the internet proves my point. If only you knew how much your lying, whiny personalities took away from the attractiveness of your butts."

Meme - *WAP* *Excited feminist*
*Sydney Sweeney* *Upset feminist*
*Lindsay Clancy* *Excited feminist*
*Shane Gillish skit* *Super triggered feminists as launched missiles*

Meme - "Why are all you whores mad at Shane Gillis? Y'all are acting like he strangled 3 children with exercise equipment"

Meme - Rachel Wilson @Rach4Patriarchy: "The same stupid women who were canceling Sydney Sweeney for doing a sexy sports ball ad a couple weeks ago are the same women who are defiantly going to the gym in a bra and booty shorts today to prove Shane Gillis wrong"
Emperor Thickens @EmperorT...: "Women are called out for dressing like whores for attention. In response, they record videos dressed as whores, saying they don't dress like whores for attention-for attention."
Marcus Reid @WarNoWinners: "It's just another excuse to dress like a whore at the gym for male attention, but the second a naturally hot woman commands more of that attention, suddenly it's a crime. Same thing children do."

Meme - David Pivtorak @TheDavidPiv: "All the women criticizing Shane Gillis right now:"
dasha @nobody_stop_me: "PLEASE stop sexualizing my tight wet pussy!!!"

Meme - *Monk lifting weights in gym with closed eyes while woman pulls up her skirt and shakes her bare ass in front of him while pretending to lift weights*

Natalie Jean Beisner on X - "I’m really confused. Last month feminists were mad at Sydney Sweeney for prancing around naked and in her underwear, sexualizing herself and women in her gambling ad. …but now we’re mad a comedian said women dress like whores in the gym? Can someone explain this to me? I’m getting whiplash."
Lisa Britton on X - "It really is hard to keep up with what women are supposed to be upset about. Whiplash, indeed. One minute, everyone is outraged that Sweeney objectifying and sexualizing herself was “setting women back” and anyone going against that was a misogynist, and now women objectifying and sexualizing themselves is perfectly acceptable and anyone going against that is a misogynist."
Electronzap on X - "The rules change however they need to in order to constantly keep attacking men."

Meme - ">NO
>I DONT WANNA GET MARRIED
>I WANT TO BE SEEN AND HEARD
>I WANT TO START AN ONLYFANS
>I WANT TO SPEND MY 20s GETTING PLOWED INTO OBLIVION BY MEN I'VE JUST MET WHO ARE AN 8 OR ABOVE
>I WANT TO GET KNOCKED UP DOZENS OF TIMES AND USE ABORTION AS A BIRTH CONTROL
>I WANT TO BELIEVE I'M MORE ATTRACTIVE THEN I AM BECAUSE A 10/10 CHAD LET ME BLOW HIM ONCE BEFORE GHOSTING ME
>I WANT TO OPENLY SUPPORT THE INVASION OF MY COUNTRY BY THE THIRD WORLD
>IF I I EVER DO GET MARRIED I WANT IT TO BE FOR MONEY
>I WANT TO BE ALLOWED TO MURDER MY KIDS IF I'M EVER FEELING DEPRESSED OR MY STAR SIGN TELLS ME TO
>I WANT TO LOOK LIKE I'M 60 BY AGE 30
>I WANT TO BECOME A BITTER OLD CRONE WHO HATES ALL MEN AND ATTRACTIVE YOUNG WOMEN
Why can't men empathize with her? Is it because women have higher EQ (Emotional Intelligence)? This is very Gemini-coded. Saturn must be in retrograde."

Meme - "What secret ended a relationship instantly?"
"Found out my boyfriend had been recording our arguments on his phone. Not for himself. He was posting them online and letting strangers vote on who was right. He had 40k followers. I was losing 70 to 30."
Dave L.: "I don't see a problem here. Women do the same thing but in group chats with screen shots and voice messages."

Meme - Specter @DemonFramed: "I'm sorry to tell you this, but your girlfriend just got her insides demolished, and the guilt is eating her alive. If your girlfriend or wife suddenly starts love bombing you out of nowhere, you need to automatically assume another man just busted inside her."
Peter @Peterisrandom: "2AM and suddenly I'm the only person she feels safe with"
"What time would you be coming over tonight?"
"I can't. I'm busy. Going to a party with friends, I might spend the night at her place"
"Ohh okay"
"I'll text you later"
"I can't stop thinking about you. I know I've been distant but you're literally the only person I feel safe with. I hate that I pushed you away. You always make me feel safe. I don't say it enough but I really love you. You're the best thing that's ever happened to me. Please don't get tired of me. I swear I'll do better. Just don't leave me. Say something ... please. I need you rn"

Meme - "Foid Bingo
"Incel" "Gay reference' "Cis" "White" *prawn*
"Just say you ... " "Hairline reference" "Short-man complex" "Fragile" “Immature"
"Manchild" "Toxic masculinity" "FREE SPACE"  "Mansplaining" "Touch grass"
"Go to therapy" "Who hurt you?" "Projection" "Red flag" "It's giving ... "
"You're weird" "Women don't owe you anything" "Small ego" "Chronically online" "Get a life"

Meme - Emily Carter: "Can someone make my boyfriend look like he has money?" *man with mid woman* Ben Parker: "Sure. Here you go." *man with pretty woman*

Amarachi 🎀 on X - "A WOMAN will find another YOU 20 times before you find another HER."
jesse alordiah 44DB on X - "are you saying there are more good men than good women out there?"

Thread by @BrianMPeter on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "Having sex in the 90s
Man- I'm sexually attracted to you
Woman- me too
Man- let's fuck
Woman- yes
Having sex in 2026:
Man- I'm sexually attracted to you
Woman- I'm sexually attracted to you too.... but, my rent is due, I need to make my hair, l've not eaten since last week, I need a new bag, I need new clothes and I need money for maintenance.
Man- are you a prostitute?
Woman- ewww you're a misogynist and not a real man 🤏🏼"

Thrilla the Gorilla on X - "When a man is retarded, men tell him that he’s retarded and to stop being retarded. Behind every retarded woman are 1000 more retarded women encouraging her to continue being retarded."

Aimee Terese on X - "“Women talk a lot about how scared of male violence they are, but from their behavior it's clear they never actually consider it a possibility”  When I was eighteen I was out for the night with my bf and some friends, we were barhopping in Kings Cross. I was tipsy & occasionally lippy & obnoxious towards strangers (who were asking for it!).   My bf quietly & discreetly at one point during the night said “babe, I love you, but fuck sometimes I worry that you’re writing cheques I won’t be able to cash, if it comes to and I’m on my own”. I was like “wtf are you talking about?”   He literally had to explain to me that if I was being a fuckwit starting trouble, he’d obviously have to defend me if anything went down, and if I’m being a massive smart ass and it’s just like him & me & my best girlfriend, then he’s going to be in a fight on his own. All because I was being an antagonistic smart ass to some strangers who couldn’t take a joke.  The idea that I needed to be able to back up my words with violence if it came to it, was something that had literally never occurred to me. Ever.   It was a total revelation. Suddenly i realised talk wasn’t “cheap” in this context, it was expensive. The idea that I could effectively get him beaten up, or put him in real danger, by being a precocious little shit arguing with idiots because I could, was horrifying.   From then on I was extremely reluctant to ever argue with strangers or act like a smart ass unnecessarily, because I was suddenly keenly aware that the guys we were with could potentially be expected to pay with their lives for any poorly received flippant comments we made.   It really was totally novel to me. This isn’t how women see the world, at all."
I Know What I Know on X - "Mate, I had the exact same situation in my longest relationship. 5 years in, we are out for drinks in her hometown….and she picks a confrontation with 3 guys (all much bigger than me) at the cashpoint.  I had to get involved verbally, and if one on them would have gone any further, honour dictated I would have to do something, and I would have gotten a serious beating.  When I explained this to her the following morning, she was genuinely confused."
Aimee Terese on X - "I remember it so vividly because at 18 I was actually smart and mature and had seen and experienced more than most people my age, I wasn’t naive.   And yet this entire concept, that ones words translated almost directly into risk or liability that one had to be willing to bear in terms of physical violence, this is so completely anathema to the way women reflexively see the world.   It’s just not the way we are socialised at all. I found it to be a really meaningful lesson, and I pulled my head in quickly. I had just turned 18 (old enough to go to clubs and bars) so it was the perfect time to learn that lesson, but I can’t help but wonder what might have happened had my bf not explained it to me?   He was like 6’3’ so he was like forced to play the authority figure whether he wanted to or not, he would be the guy people would challenge to a fight, even though he wa like not a fighter at all, so I guess it was something he had to go through life conscious of, whereas upto that point I had never even considered."

Larry Correia on X - "Ladies, if your man is about to get into a fight don't grab his arm. Don't pull his shirt. Your motherly instincts aren't helping. Get the fuck out of the way. Note how the delusional family and "helpful" bystanders always grab the normal dude instead of the deranged schizophrenic hobo who is harassing people."
Women don't understand the reality of violence

Devon Eriksen on X - "This is a public service announcement for all women everywhere ever.   A fight does not happen by mutual consent. A fight happens because one person decides to start it.   That's ONE. Uno. Un. Eins. Ichi. Yī. Unus. Ett. Hana. Wāḥid.   One is not two.   Your man is not in a fight because he looked at the other guy, and they both said, hey, let's totally throw down, bro, as if fighting were a pickup game of basketball.   Your man is in a fight because one person decided to attack. That person is not necessarily your man even if, and I cannot stress this enough, even if your man is the one who throws hands first.   Yes, you read that right. If you don't understand, if it makes no sense to you, that's because you know nothing about fighting.   If you grab your man and try to restrain him, you are not preventing the fight. You are restraining him while the fight occurs.   Just because you would like your man to exit the situation does not necessarily mean he can. Even if he can, that does not necessarily mean he should.   He knows about fighting. Some men know less about it, and some men know more, but unless you are Ronda Rousey or Lena Miculek, your man always knows more about fighting than you.   If you have something you want him to do, like exit the situation if he can, use your words like a big girl.   Do not touch him.   He will ignore you, of course, because you have no idea what you are talking about, but you can talk if it makes you happy.   Do not touch him.   Step back from the area of conflict and get out of the way. Keep him between you and the threat if possible.   Do not get between him and the threat. That is retarded.   Also do not touch him.   If you do touch him, do not be surprised if you shoves you hard enough to land you on your butt ten feet away. This is the appropriate response. He is trying to protect himself and you from your willful ignorance.   Do not touch him.   If you do touch him,  and he survives, do not be surprised if he ends the relationship afterwards. You grossly disrespected his judgement, and put him in serious danger with your selfish desire to be right all the time.   Do not touch him.   The time to have a conversation about whether the fight should have happened is after the fight, not while people are in danger.   Do not touch him.   Okay, quick reading comprehension test.   What should you not do?"

Isabel Brown on X - "When Lauren Friedman showed up at Amherst College, she was surprised to discover that almost every single girl in her dorm and on her athletic team was already taking SSRIs.  Inside jokes about Zoloft & Lexapro were common on campus, and everyone seemed deeply grateful their persistent anxiety and depression from teenage years was magically disappearing from a pharmaceutical drug.  Like her peers, @lololizzle  had struggled earlier in life with both anxiety and depression -- so Zoloft seemed like a perfect solution. After all, all of her friends were taking it too, so how bad could it be?  Little did she know, SSRIs are causing a silent epidemic among Gen Zers called Post-SSRI Sexual Dysfunction, or PSSD. Like untold tens of thousands of other people just like her, Lauren now has completely lost her libido, sensation in her genitals, and even a sense of emotional connection with the people around her... PERMANENTLY.  She says she and others like her were NEVER given informed consent about the risk of developing PSSD, and American doctors will rarely even diagnose the condition at all.  Whether it's birth control being thrown in the faces of teenage girls to magically "regulate your hormones" or Zoloft instantly prescribed to "make you happy," one thing is clear--the young women of Generation Z are being poisoned en masse without any understanding of what may happen to them down the line."
Mankind vs Modern Feminism on X - "I truly pity women who have been destroyed by Modern Feminism.  Watch this video, then read what follows.  The cure for MOST teenage female depression and dysphoria is alloparenting with older women, and the natural transition from "maiden" to "mother" in a collective context with friends, aunts, and grandmothers that gives them the dopamine, oxytocin, and serotonin they need to NOT be dysphoric, in a largely cooperative and non-competitive "alloparenting" environment.  The "cure" for most teenage female dysphoria is holding babies, getting approval from mothers and aunts for caring for babies, then themselves having babies, while their friends also have babies, and raising them together, as a loose collective.  Birth control (for mood regulation) and SSRIs treat the SYMPTOMS of the problem (evolutionary failure to launch) with HUGE longitudinal iatrogenic harm to women, family, unborn generations, and civilization.  When will doctors actually begin to recommend the CURE for this disease of female teenage dysphoria - alloparenting and the transition to maternity?"

Leftists Mad at Sydney Sweeney / Claude vs Starlink for War

Pre-emptively skipping iFunny:

evan loves worf @esjesjesj: "Literally no leftist is mad about that" - Jul 30, 2025
Fox News @FoxNews: "RED HOT: "Let's cut the nonsense: liberal women aren't mad at Sydney Sweeney because she's "setting women back" ... They're mad because she's young, hot, White, and blonde. And they're mad that corporations are finally waking up to the truth: that the American people are done Show more"
"OPINION: THE WAR ON HOT WOMEN: WHY THE WOKE MOB HATES SYDNEY SWEENEY"

evan loves worf @esjesjesj: "Did they mean to include a bunch of Nazi dog whistles in this" - Jul 25, 2025
Sweeney Daily @sweeneydailyx: "Sydney Sweeney x American Eagle, oh my god."

Dario Amodei (CEO of Anthropic): "No Claude for War"
Democratic Donkey: "Hero!"
Elon Musk (CEO of Spacex): "No Starlink for War"
Democratic Donkey: "Nazi!"

Links - November 13 2026 (Palestine/Middle East Peace)

U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
Marina Medvin 🇺🇸 on X - "LMAO. This is who is getting the Nobel Peace Prize. Because leftism is brain rot."

Alef Avenue | Facebook - "Yasser Arafat won a Nobel Peace Prize. Winning one of these does not prove that you’re a champion of peace. This snake accepted a Nobel peace prize, and sat with the Israeli prime minister holding a sign that had שלום shalom written on it in 1994. Arafat led Fatah and the entire PLO during decades of terrorist attacks against Israel committed by Arabs from “Palestine.” Suicide bombings, hijackings, murdering innocent Israeli civilians, targeting the IDF, kidnapping hostages, and much more."

BRUTAL! Former World Chess Champion Garry Kasparov TORCHES Nobel Committee After Controversial Peace Prize Award: “Maybe Next Year They’ll Give the Chemistry Prize to a Hamas Bomb Maker” - "The chess legend was reacting to the committee’s decision to honor Pillay “for her efforts to promote peace and international law.” [Navi] Pillay chaired the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, which issued a report accusing Israel of “genocide” in Gaza.  Critics, including Israeli officials and Jewish advocacy groups, have long documented her lack of impartiality: she signed a 2020 manifesto calling on governments to “Sanction Apartheid Israel,” then accepted the chairmanship of the inquiry without disclosing the conflict; she defended a fellow commissioner who invoked “the Jewish lobby”; and she has a record of one-sided criticism that ignored Hamas’s October 7, 2023 massacre of 1,200 Israelis, the rapes, the hostages, and the group’s use of human shields."
Garry Kasparov on X - "Maybe next year they’ll give the Chemistry prize to a Hamas bomb maker."

Sarah Ettedgui on X - "When Wikipedia Becomes the Source Code for AI
Most people have no idea what is unfolding inside Wikipedia’s most sensitive articles. Haviv Rettig Gur’s conversation with Ashley Rindsberg reveals a problem that cannot be ignored.  The implications go far beyond one page. They influence how the internet defines core concepts. They influence how AI systems learn. They influence what the next generation believes Zionism is. Here is the current lead sentence of the Zionism article, now under moratorium until February 2026: “Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible.”  This is not neutral language. Sure, Zionism, like every national movement, sought a demographic majority of its own people. That is the basic logic of self-determination. What this sentence does is single out the Jewish national movement as uniquely spiteful, exclusionary, even eliminationist, while treating the same demographic logic as entirely normal for everyone else.  Apply the standard consistently and it aligns with Palestinian nationalism even more clearly. Gaza has had no Jewish population for nearly twenty years. The Palestinian Authority governs areas with virtually none. No serious observer expects a future Palestinian state to aspire to a meaningful Jewish demographic, and Palestinian leaders say so explicitly. Yet Wikipedia presents what is normal for Palestinians (and every other people) as evidence of malice when Jews pursue the same goal.  That is the asymmetry Haviv Rettig Gur was describing. The sentence reframes Zionism not as a movement of national revival or as the return of Jewish refugees from Europe and the Arab world to their historic homeland and language, but as something inherently hateful. And it sits in the most authoritative position on the page, written in Wikipedia’s own voice, where only uncontested facts are supposed to appear.  The problem is not only the sentence. The problem is the system that allowed a small, coordinated group of editors to insert it and then protect it through procedural warfare and exhaustion of opponents.  Once something enters Wikipedia this way, it spreads. Wikipedia is a primary data source for Google, for search engines, and for every major AI system: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, all of them. These systems treat lead sections as high-confidence truth. When Wikipedia is distorted, the entire knowledge ecosystem becomes distorted with it.  This is why the issue matters so deeply. A manipulated framing of Zionism is being elevated into the base architecture of digital knowledge, where it will be indexed, repeated, summarized, and reinforced as objective fact millions of times each day.  If we care about intellectual integrity and about our children, we cannot dismiss this as a minor online dispute. Wikipedia remains the baseline reference for an entire generation, and AI technologies now reproduce its claims as if they were settled history. When editors whose activity and off-wiki statements align with Iranian state media and other hostile actors succeed in seeding disinformation into the core definition of Zionism, that disinformation becomes the first lens through which millions of young people encounter Jewish history and identity.  We have a responsibility to call this out and to protect the next generation from narratives designed to delegitimize them.  Listen to the podcast. Read the investigative work. This deserves far more attention than it has received."

Group says it vandalized Ontario facility because of ties to Israel | National Post - "the anti-Israel group Palestine Action Canada took responsibility for the damage. A video posted to the account shows a masked person cutting wires in a dark room with a flashlight illuminating the scene... Jewish advocacy group B’nai Brith Canada urged the Canadian federal government to take action against the group after it released a map of locations to “target” because of apparent ties to Israel. The map of “targets” included sites within Canada.  The group also released a manual that described how to take “direct action” and provided advice on how “to develop small ‘cells’ to perpetrate property damage, in addition to guidance on avoiding law enforcement and destroying evidence of criminal misconduct.”  In the United States, sanctions were issued against the group, which according to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, “has supported numerous acts of terrorism since July 2020, including acts that have physically injured U.K. law enforcement personnel, as well as acts intended to intimidate lawful commercial enterprises and coerce the U.K. Government.”"
More suppression of "pro-Palestine" "speech"!

Toronto lawyer says he was attacked in the street for being Jewish - "A Toronto-area real estate agent and lawyer has been left with lesions and bruises after he says he was attacked by a man who threatened to kill him while shouting that Jews were “baby killers committing genocide.” Joseph Bitton was at a commercial property he manages in the Jane Street and Lawrence Avenue West area around noon on Tuesday, when a man allegedly began swinging a parking pylon at him... “I dodged all the projectiles he was throwing at me, blocked him with my arms. I’ve got lesions and scratches on both arms,” said Bitton, whose injuries were documented by a doctor later that day. “Some people are telling me I should have knocked the guy out. I said, ‘Absolutely not. Then I would be arrested, and he would go free, and I would be the bad guy.’ So I deliberately just stayed 10 or 15 feet away,” Bitton told National Post... He followed the man from a distance of 10 to 15 feet as he boarded one bus, then attempted to escape through a rear door, crossed the street and got on another bus headed in the opposite direction. Bitton said he alerted both bus drivers that police were on their way and asked them not to move until officers arrived. “Nobody lifted a finger,” Bitton lamented. “There were dozens and dozens of witnesses at the bus stop, on the bus, at the other location across the street, at the original location. The only one single person that stepped out to help me was one retail tenant from the property that I manage, and he knows me. He came out when the guy was swinging this pylon, and tried to put distance between us and get the guy to stand down.” According to Bitton, his attacker eventually moved into a laneway behind an automotive repair shop, throwing rocks and bricks, before police arrived. Bitton said eight officers cornered the suspect in a dead end, handcuffed him and placed him in a cruiser. “When the police grabbed him,” Bitton said, “he kept saying ‘I didn’t do anything!’” From footage from eight property surveillance cameras, police officers identified a suspect, he said. “They saw the guy doing everything, throwing the pylon at me, and swinging at me, and throwing things at me,” Bitton said. Police charged Abdulkadir Al-Jelani, 58, of Toronto, with three counts of assault with a weapon and one count of uttering death threats. They are investigating the incident as a possible hate-motivated crime."
Time to blame "Zionists", Mossad and/or Israel, one way or the other

Toronto, Edmonton police arrest multiple suspects in anti-Israel incidents - "Police forces in Edmonton and Toronto announced charges this week following separate criminal incidents tied to anti-Israel hostility, including a knife attack at a festival pavilion and a violent assault during a demonstration.  In Edmonton, police charged Abdimalik Jama, 29, on Wednesday in connection with an incident at the Edmonton Heritage Festival on August 3.  Jama breached a protective perimeter around the festival's Israel pavilion, lunged with a knife, and struck the back of the kitchen tent before security guards detained him and on-site officers arrested him... in Toronto, police announced an arrest on Wednesday in an assault causing bodily harm investigation stemming from a March for Palestine protest on Saturday.  Authorities stated that a victim walking near Yonge Street and Grosvenor Street was approached from behind and punched multiple times in the head without provocation, sustaining facial and leg injuries... Martin Salgatar, 20, of Mississauga, surrendered to police at 52 Division on Monday and was charged with aggravated assault... the victim, Kyle, was a familiar presence in the local protest landscape who participates across various causes as a protester, counterprotester, and independent creator  Sa'd wrote that following the assault, others swarmed the victim, pointing, laughing, and seemingly trying to prevent bystanders from helping, before Salgatar escaped into the crowd after being urged to leave.  Kyle was subsequently transported to the hospital with a serious knee injury that left him unable to walk.  "This is what happens when repeated warnings about unlawful behavior at protests go unanswered, and police refuse to meaningfully address concerns about enforcement," Sa'd wrote online. "It is as though protesters have been led to believe they can assault people with impunity, particularly those documenting their public activities.""
Damn police suppressing "pro-Palestine" "speech"!
Mossad is so smart, they employ people with Muslim names for their false flag attacks

Meme - burntoakboy: "Two months ago, the Irish cricket team played Afghanistan, a country where women are treated like animals, where homosexuality is punishable by death and where democracy is entirely non-existent. The progressive Dublin elites said fuck-all. Tomorrow, the Irish football team will play Israel, a democracy, the only free country in the Middle East and a nation where women and gays enjoy full, unfettered equality. And the progressive Dublin elites have gone nuts. They've wept and wailed and marched. They've spoken of nothing else for weeks on end. There is no way to explain this mania and hypocrisy without using the word antisemitism. Go on, try. It's impossible."

Meme - *Fred from Scooby Doo unmasking 'Free Palestine'*
Hitler under mask: "KILL THE JEWS!"
The Palestinian @InsiderWorld_1: "Wish Hitler lives till now"
The Palestinian @InsiderWorld_1: "Hitler was the one good German!"
As left wingers would say if they were consistent, not all anti-Zionists are anti-Semites, but all anti-Semites are anti-Zionists. But they only use that to smear right wingers/Trump supporters as bigots by association

Meme - "EVERY TYPE OF PRO-PALESTINE AND ANTI-ISRAEL ACTIVIST
Communist Socialist. History Denier. LGBTQ WOKE. BLM ANTIFA. Left-wing Liberals
Useful Idiot. Ignorant Retard. Clueless Influencer. Conspiracy theorist. Muslim Islamists
Mob Enjoyer Riot Junkie. Paid activist. Fascist Nazi. Right-wing Jew Hater. Blame Addict Victim Lifer
WHERE DO YOU FIT IN?"

Dr. Maalouf ‏ on X - "Pro-Palestinian activist in Sweden: “I know I don’t belong here. That is why I’m destroying this country as much as I can, and sucking up all the benefits and tax money to the absolute max." Remember, the entire purpose of the Palestinian movement is to advance the Islamic takeover of the West. These people absolutely hate you."

Revealed: the ‘Palestine poppy’ creator who justified stoning | The Spectator - "The creator of the ‘Palestine poppy’ is an Oxford-educated paediatrician who has written books for Muslim teenagers justifying stoning and warning that homosexuality is ‘a test from Allah’. Abdul Qader Ismail was accused of trying to ‘hijack’ Remembrance Day after he began selling an enamel pin shaped like a poppy in the colours of the Palestinian flag for £1.78 on eBay. The pin is listed as ‘not for profit’ with money being donated to Gaza charities. The Spectator can now reveal that Ismail is an active member of Greens for Palestine and co-sponsored the group’s ‘Zionism is Racism’ policy. He is also the author of a book series titled An Introduction to Challenging Topics for Muslim Teens. A chapter in the first book, marked for readers aged 13 to 15 and older, discusses religious punishments including stoning, whipping, crucifixion and amputation. Ismail describes them as deterrents and writes that, if applied, they may be a blessing because a person pays for their sins in this life and avoids punishment in the afterlife...  A separate chapter on female genital mutilation, marked for readers aged 15 to 17 and older, describes one traditional Islamic religious position as allowing, and even recommending, female circumcision. It discusses procedures such as reducing or removing the clitoral hood and reducing the inner labia, and describes arguments for having them performed by a trained surgeon using sterile equipment. Ismail writes: ‘The traditional Islamic position is that female circumcision is allowed, and even desirable. This is based on several Hadith.’ He also outlines that some scholars believe FGM is unacceptable...  In the Greens for Palestine WhatsApp chat, Ismail has accused Zack Polanski of ‘confirming he is a genocide denier’. He has also declared: ‘Zionism is in its dying stages, but things will likely get worse before they get better.’"
No surprise that people associated with a toxic movement is toxic. The "pro-Palestine" people are terrible people

Revealed: Jonathan Powell’s wife has defended Hamas | The Spectator - "Sarah Helm, the wife of Britain’s national security adviser, Jonathan Powell, took flak last week after appearing to support Palestine Action, the banned terror group, on Twitter. The police looked, but took no further action. The Spectator can reveal that there is vastly more material, far more controversial than this, in Helm’s tweets. Helm has defended Hamas, questioned reports of mass rape by the terror group, blamed the 7 October attacks on the creation of Israel in 1948, compared Israel to the Nazis, and appeared to praise Syria’s then dictator Bashar al-Assad for remarks in which he had called the Jewish state an ‘outlaw colonial entity’ populated by ‘herds of settlers that are closer to barbarism than to humanity.’ She has also called for western military intervention against Israel and attacked her husband’s own government for its ‘complicity’ and ‘appeasement’ towards Tel Aviv. Here are some of the highlights. All of these posts are still up at the time of writing and several were made while Powell was serving as national security adviser. What on earth must the pillow-talk in the Powell-Helm household be like?"

Campaign Against Antisemitism on X - "The police have now reportedly announced that Sarah Helm’s post did not reach the criminal threshold and therefore that no further action will be taken.  So it’s illegal to express support for a proscribed terrorist organisation if you’re an ordinary person, but if you allegedly do it when you’re the wife of the National Security Advisor, that’s okay?  Aren’t we supposed to be a country where everyone is equal under the law?  With decisions like this, it’s no wonder that 89% of British Jews think the authorities are not doing enough to tackle political extremism.  Police inaction in this high-profile case beggars belief. It’s another nail in the coffin of British justice."

Visegrad24 | Facebook - "🇳🇱🇮🇱 Sarah Hildering van Lith, a non-Jewish Amsterdam-born music executive at Universal Music Group, says she fled the Netherlands for Israel after a wave of antisemitic threats, intimidation, and attacks following October 7. Hildering herself is also a terror attack survivor. On October 7, 2004,  exactly 19 years before the Hamas massacre, Palestinian terrorists bombed the Taba Hilton in Sinai where she was staying as a teenager. She survived but permanently lost 60% hearing in one ear. Things escalated dramatically in March 2024. While unlocking her front door in Amsterdam, she says a Moroccan Muslim man approached her screaming: “Cancer Jew wh*re, I’m going to rape you.” Within seconds, two other Muslim men reportedly joined him after hearing the word “Jew.” Hildering believes she was targeted because she wore a Star of David necklace. She later described seeing Amsterdam radically change after October 7, saying her neighborhood became covered in Palestinian and Hamas flags. During an interfaith dialogue initiative backed by Amsterdam’s mayor, she says one Muslim cultural leader openly defended “jihad” as synonymous with the caliphate while others nodded in agreement. In another incident in May 2025, Hildering says a man driving beside her on an Amsterdam highway made a throat-slitting gesture, displayed Hamas imagery on his car, then allegedly tried to force her into a near-fatal crash while shouting “Allahu Akbar.” After moving to a Jewish neighborhood hoping to feel safer, her new home was burglarized in what she believes was a targeted attack. Around €30,000–€40,000 worth of valuables, heirlooms, jewelry, and Israel-related items were stolen. Neighbors reportedly captured footage of a van surveilling her home for days beforehand. “I thought I would grow old and die in Amsterdam. I never imagined myself fleeing my birth city for safety reasons.”"
Damn Mossad!

TrendingPolitics.ca on X - "A fire truck responding to an emergency in Vancouver was forced to wait after pro-Palestinian protesters blocked the street, leaving crews unable to get through."
Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 on X - "The trucker convoy in Ottawa had daily coordination with the police, and agreed to keep a lane clear for emergency vehicles. They were still prosecuted with a vicious vendetta. Pro-Hamas extremists, many of them foreign nationals, block firetrucks with impunity. #TwoTier"
Protests are only a sacred right that cannot be interfered with in democracies if they push the left wing agenda

Maral Salmassi on X - "Amsterdam, 2026. Why are we tolerating this?"
leekern on X - "You wanted globalise the intifada? Cool. Now you have masked muslim psychopaths marching the streets of Europe holding the machine gun flag of Islamic terror groups like Hezbollah Their name means “the party of Allah” and their goal is to murder and subjugate humanity until Islam reigns supreme"

Dr. Maalouf ‏ on X - "TERRIFYING: In Amsterdam, Netherlands, Muslims and far-left activists with Hamas flags openly call for jihad.  I don’t think Europe is taking this Islamic threat very seriously. What do you think will happen when these terrorists realize they cannot destroy Israel?  That’s right. They’ll do to their host countries what they want to do to Israel. Dark days ahead."
"We support Hamas" signs. Clearly, this is Mossad's doing!

Eyal Yakoby on X - "Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Zahar reveals that their true goal is to wipe out all Christians and Jewish people across the world. “To create a world where Judaism and Christianity do not exist.”"

Owen Jones on X - "When the Zionist movement was promised Palestine by the British Empire, 90% of its people were Arab Muslims and Christians. The Zionist movement of the era echoed the colonialist mantras of the time to justify taking the land away from the people who actually lived there."
Mor Edge Insight on X - "This is exactly why an uneducated socialist pleb like @owenjonesjourno  is simply the last person anybody should ever even take seriously. He literally makes up everything he claims. None of it has any historical legitimacy. He’s a charlatan and a propagandist, and nothing more.   Jones is treating 1917 as year zero. It isn’t.  When the British promised a Jewish national home, Jews were already the largest community in Jerusalem and, by the later Ottoman counts, the majority.   The Prussian consul in 1844 put Jews ahead of Muslims and Christians in the city. By the 1880s they were the vast majority. Yet Herzl didn’t publish “The Jewish State” until 1896.   The people Jones says “actually lived there” didn’t include, in his telling, the Jews who already did.  His 90 percent figure is a countrywide snapshot of a thinly governed Ottoman district, not a title deed. And the promise wasn’t the whole map. In 1922 Britain cut the Mandate at the Jordan River. About three-quarters of the original territory, the part that became Transjordan, was closed to Jewish settlement and handed to an Arab emirate. The Jewish national home was what was left west of the river. That partition happened before a single refugee from 1948 existed.  Arabs did move into western Palestine in the Mandate years. British officials recorded illegal and unrecorded immigration from Syria, Egypt, and Transjordan into the towns the new economy was building. People moved toward jobs which the Jews created.   And none of this explains 1834. In Safed, Arab and Druze mobs looted the Jewish quarter for 33 days, killing and raping hundreds of Jews, while Egypt was fighting a peasant revolt. In Hebron the same summer, Jews who had taken no side were killed, synagogues wrecked, the quarter stripped. Herzl wasn’t even born.  There was no Zionist movement, no Balfour, no occupation to blame. The attacks still happened.  Jones isn’t describing the historical record. He is inventing a history that simply never existed, starting it at 1917, and omitting everything that came before it."

💀 Bisexual Selena 💀 on X - "Reminder that Israel has destroyed the whole town of Bethlehem and yet not a single Christian has spoke up about it since then"
Dr. Maalouf ‏ on X - "Bethlehem was 80% Christian under Israeli control. Then the city was transferred to the Palestinian Authority in 1995. 30 years later, it is now less than 10% Christian. Making the birth town of Jesus Muslim-majority was always an Islamic goal."
Time to get Christians to condemn the Israeli persecution of Christians

Meme - ""Activist for the Worker" vs. The Worker
*Man in red balaclava and topless waving Palestine flag with graffiti*
*Worker cleaning up graffiti*"

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇫🇷🇺🇦🇹🇼 on X - "BREAKING: An extremist Palestine supporter just carried out Australia's first attempted political assassination in thirty years. Radical left-wing terrorist and Houthi supporter Brendan Nugent rammed independent MP Helen Haines with his car, shattering her lower body and critically injuring her. She will probably lose both her legs and could still die of critical injuries.  Pray for Helen's recovery. She is actually a progressive MP who spoke out for Gaza, yet the crazy terrorist still targeted her."
The "pro-Palestine" crowd are the worst.
Time to crush the "far right"!
Leopards eating people's faces is only for people who threaten the left wing agenda

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇫🇷🇺🇦🇹🇼 on X - "Horrific news: Australian MP Helen Haines will never walk again as a result of Monday’s far-left terror attack. Doctors had to amputate both her legs.   Her attacker was radicalised on the fringes of the Palestine movement in Australia. He supported the Houthis and expressed support for Hamas.   The anti-Israel movement in Australia has so much blood on its hands. 15 dead at Bondi and now an Australian MP forced to amputate both legs. Out of control. The anti-Zionists are literally a biblical plague on any nation that allows their movement to fester"

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇫🇷🇺🇦🇹🇼 on X - "Australian Federal Police commissioner Krissy Barrett just tried to say that Pauline Hanson’s cartoon series was morally responsible for the far-left terrorist attack on Helen Haines. She needs to resign. Labor obviously put her up to this to try push the Digital Duty of Care bill and censorship against the Australian right. Just sickening attempts to weaponise a far-left terror attack to destroy the Australian right with censorship. We literally have the attacker’s Twitter account. He had TEN THOUSAND left wing tweets and they are still trying to pin this on the right. They were itching from the very first seconds of the attack to blame this on the right to justify censorship against right wingers."

The Daily Telegraph on X = "Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has deflected questions about a reported ‘dirt sheet’ his office compiled on independent MP Helen Haines last month, instead praising her as a “good local member”."
Dave Hughes on X - "He used taxpayer funds in an attempt to ruin Helen Haines political career only a few weeks ago and on Monday night he called her ‘A beacon of light’ with ‘the highest integrity’. We all have been let down so badly. My god, no wonder Australia is tanking so hard."

Zionism And Anti-Zionism | Facebook - "Antizionism did not appear ex nihilo; it evolved from classical antisemitism, adapting old libels into new, contextually plausible forms. Its core accusations—colonizer, apartheid, and genocide—can all be understood as ideological mutations of earlier anti-Jewish tropes. The charge of “colonizer” reframes the classical image of the Jew as a foreign usurper or parasitic outsider, a theme recurring in the writings of Marr, Drumont, Stoecker, and refined within Nazi racial doctrine. The accusation of “apartheid” secularizes an older anti-Judaic trope: that Jews, as a self-declared “chosen people,” separate themselves from and despise others—an image now transmuted into the claim that Zionists are inherently racist. The genocide libel forms a crucial evolutionary link: the Nazis claimed that Jews were plotting to exterminate the German people, while the Mufti of Jerusalem broadcast on Nazi radio that Zionists intended to annihilate the Arabs. Classical antisemitism was animated by fantasies of Jewish takeover and national extinction—fantasies now projected onto Israel itself. Yet evolution is not identity. Antizionism is not the same as classical antisemitism, just as Homo sapiens is not Homo erectus. It is a descendant, not a replica—a new formation bearing the inherited structure of accusation, but expressed in a different moral and political language."

Meme - Dr. Eli David: "Let that sink in: Arabs have more rights in Israel than in any Arab country."
Yaron Samid @yaron...: "Hi, @grok. In which Muslim countries do Arabs have more rights than in Israel?"
Grok @grok: "None. Per Freedom House 2026, Israel scores 73 (Free). No Muslim-majority country scores higher: Senegal 70 (Free), Albania 69 (Partly Free), Indonesia 56, Malaysia 53. Arab states score far lower (e.g. Egypt 18, Saudi Arabia 9, Iran 10). Israeli Arabs hold full citizenship, vote, and serve in the Knesset and courts."

Chrissie Mayr🇺🇸 on X - "Remember when mainstream media claimed this footage did not exist when Donald Trump said it did, trying to paint him as racist and a liar? I remember."
On Palestinians cheering after 9/11

UC Merced professor calls for ‘dezionization’ of University of California system - "A University of California Merced professor of history and critical race and ethnic studies recently called for the “dezionization” of the UC system.  Sean Malloy, who according to his faculty page researches “colonialism, war, white supremacy, and the critical study of Zionism,” writes in the Ethnic Studies Council at UC Substack that Zionism is a “driving force behind many of the external and internal threats to the UC and its faculty, staff, and students.”... Eight years ago, Malloy was apoplectic about a “threatening” display put up by the UC Merced College Republicans that included the phrases “I Love Undocumented Firearms” and “ICE ICE Baby.”  Malloy was “disgusted that some of [UC Merced] students would advocate for the government-sponsored ethnic cleansing of their fellow students,” and ripped the university for standing for the First Amendment in the face of such “terrorism.”"

Eyal Yakoby on X - "Yesterday, Islamists entered a church and slaughtered over a half dozen Christians in Jordan. Cenk Uygur? Silent. Mehdi Hasan? Silent. Ms. Rachel? Silent."
Damn Jews spitting on Christians!

Mor Edge Insight on X - "Just a reminder that between 1913 and 1923 the Turks committed not one, not two, but THREE genocides. The Armenian genocide, Assyrian genocide, and the Greek genocide. The Turks also currently illegally occupy Cyprus, for the past 50 years. The Turks also illegally occupy Northern Syria.   But yeah, let’s invert reality and just blame Israel🤦🏼‍♂️"