Michigan Activists Lose Fight to Remove Display of 3 Wise Men From Public School Roof - "A Michigan school board decided on Monday to keep Christmas decorations on top of the elementary school’s roof despite activists claiming the display is too religious. The three wise men, a biblical reference to Jesus Christ’s birth, are displayed on Newaygo Elementary School’s roof. The Michigan Association of Civil Rights Activists argued the Christmas display went against the separation of church and state"
From 2018
Collin Rugg on X - "Ms. Rachel blasts a children's soccer league for "racism" after a child's parents claim the cops were called on him for being "too good" at soccer. The man who called the police is black. He called the police because the boy's parents were being disruptive. Is there a single hoax she won't believe?"
Of course, all the other shameless left wing and black grifters were jumping on the same bandwagon
Dan Burmawi on X - "The West Got the Islam Islamic Countries Restrict
About 16,000 jihadists from the Middle East and North Africa went to fight with jihadist groups in Syria and Iraq. That region has about 414 million Muslims, 94 percent of its population. Western Europe, where Muslims number about 26 million, under 5 percent of the population, produced more than 5,000. That is one jihadist for every 25,000 or so Muslims in the Middle East and North Africa, and one for every 5,000 in Western Europe, more than four times the rate. The gap widens in individual countries. Belgium, with about 860,000 Muslims, produced roughly 500 jihadists, one for every 1,700. France, with 5.7 million Muslims, produced about 1,700, one for every 3,400. Indonesia, with about 239 million Muslims, produced about 600, one for every 400,000. Belgium’s rate is roughly two hundred times Indonesia’s. A study coordinated by Germany’s federal criminal police found that in 2025, 23.8 percent of Muslims in Germany called an Islamic theocracy the best form of government, up from 18.7 percent in 2021, and 25.1 percent put the rules of the Koran above German law. In France, 24 percent of Muslims told IFOP they sympathize with the Muslim Brotherhood, whose founder called restoring the caliphate an obligation on every Muslim. Muslims in the West are a small minority in rich, safe, free countries. Muslims in the Islamic world are the majority, and Islam runs their courts, their schools and their calendars. The second group should be the more militant one. The first is, by a wide margin. So what is happening? Why does Islam in the West, at a fraction of the numbers, produce more jihad per head than the Muslim world does?
For thirteen centuries Islam divided the world into the House of Islam and the House of War. Jihad was a divine duty of Muslims, led by the ruler. Peoples who surrendered paid the jizya and lived as dhimmis, and those who refused were fought. Jihad was the foreign policy doctrine of the Islamic Caliphate since the days of Muhammad. The last caliph to officially use this doctrine was Sultan Mehmed V, who in November 1914 proclaimed jihad against Britain, France and Russia and called on Muslims everywhere to rise. On March 3, 1924, Turkey abolished the caliphate, and the governments that subsequently took control of Muslim lands kept the shell while abandoning the doctrines. They did not retain jihad, dhimma, or the full application of sharia law. Yet these countries are called Islamic, while the thousands of Islamic groups that emerged after the caliphate’s fall to continue jihad until Allah’s rule is established over the entire earth were given a label of Western invention: “Islamism.” Under Muslim dictatorships, Islam is permitted where it serves the ruler and suppressed where it threatens him. The regime keeps the religious restrictions, the conservative customs and the demands for personal obedience. It allows Islam to govern people’s clothing, relationships and private conduct, but refuses to let an independent Islamic movement decide who has the right to rule. The ruler wants the population controlled by Islam without having his own authority challenged by it. That’s why those Muslim rulers can wage war against Islamic terrorism even though they are Muslims: because for these rulers, not for their people, trying to impose an Islamic political order is terrorism, and anyone among their people who says otherwise gets punished. Yet their people, just like the rulers themselves, know that establishing an Islamic political order is the heart of Islam, but they can’t say it openly out of fear. Those who try to accomplish it indirectly, like the Muslim Brotherhood, get banned, and those who try to establish it directly face war. Take the leash off and see what Muslims in the Islamic world will do. In Egypt, the moment the dictator fell in 2011, 13.2 million Egyptians voted for the Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate in a country where elections were controlled by the army, the same army that removed the Muslim Brotherhood’s president a year later. When Assad’s authority collapsed across much of Syria, almost all those who could joined Islamic terrorist groups: hundreds of thousands of them, spread across more than a thousand units by 2014. The fall of Saddam showed the world what happens when Muslims are no longer suppressed by a dictator and get to choose which version of Islam they believe in. In Jordan, four members of parliament visited Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s family home after he was killed to mourn him and call him a martyr, while hundreds of mourners flocked to the tent. This was the man who had bombed three Amman hotels the year before and killed Jordanians. If it weren’t for fear, millions would have gone to mourn Zarqawi.
Islamism is simply Islam practiced in freedom.
In the West, Islam has room to pursue the political ambitions that Muslim dictators keep under lock and key. A movement banned in its country of origin can establish an organization in London, recruit followers, raise money and preach that Allah’s law must govern society. The ruler who would have jailed its leaders is gone. In his place stands a democracy that protects their right to organize, without examining what they are organizing to achieve... Twenty years ago, I remember Muslim families in the West returning to their home countries when their children reached adolescence because the parents feared what Western freedom would do to them."
Britons were black ‘before these isles were British’, says Horrible Histories - "Early Britons were black “before these isles were British”, BBC children’s series Horrible Histories will tell its younger viewers in its first ever episode dedicated to black history... One song will touch on Britain’s prehistoric population having dark skin “before these Isles were British”, in reference to the probable skin colour of the 10,000-year-old Cheddar Man remains... “When we started out we had no idea of the responsibility we would end up having. There is an onus on us to get it right.”... There was widespread anger last year at the lyrics which cited tea, sugar, cotton and even Queen Victoria as examples of supposedly “British things” that are “from abroad” or “frankly stolen”."
From 2021. If you push the left wing agenda, you're morally right even if factually wrong, which is all that matters
No, the first Britons were not ‘black’ - spiked - "The idea that the native inhabitants of a nation have some kind of mystical connection with the land is something usually associated with the ultra-nationalist far right. So why are self-professed anti-racists now trying to bring back this blood-and-soil mindset? Last month, the Black Cultural Archives (BCA) in Brixton, south London hosted an exhibition claiming that the first Britons were black. The Brilliant Black British History exhibition was based on the children’s book of the same name by Nigerian-born poet and author Atinuke. The exhibition, funded by both Lambeth Council and Arts Council England, made some truly astonishing claims. Visitors to the exhibit were told that ‘Britain was black for 7,000 years’ before white people arrived. Apparently, scientists have discovered that ‘the first migrants to Britain around 12,000 years ago had black skin’. This seems to be based on the contentious genetic study that claimed the Cheddar Man – the 10,000-year-old set of remains found in Somerset – was likely to have had ‘dark to black skin’. Of course, that would not have made the Cheddar Man ‘black’ in any meaningful sense. It would be ludicrous to suggest that the dark-skinned, blue-eyed people who inhabited most of western Europe 10,000 years ago had any concept at all of ‘blackness’. And it is even more ridiculous to suggest that the pigmentation of the Cheddar Man’s skin meant that he shared the same ethnicity as today’s Brits of African and Caribbean descent. Undeterred by these inconvenient facts, the exhibition goes on to claim that Emperor Septimius Severus, who died in York in the 3rd century AD, was ‘a black Roman ruler’. As it turns out, Severus was born in North Africa, a fact that has been taken to mean he was ‘black’. In fact, it is much more likely that Severus was of Italian and Middle Eastern descent. The curators make this mistake once again when they claim that a whopping 11 per cent of Roman York was black. This seems to come from a misunderstanding of a 2009 study, which found that one group of human remains in York was composed mainly of migrants from North Africa. Amazingly, the content of the BCA exhibition was actually a lot tamer than the children’s book it was based on. Atinuke’s Brilliant Black British History tells young readers that black people built Stonehenge, that ‘every single British person comes from a migrant’ and that Britain’s population was majority black for longer than it has been majority white. These claims are skewed, to say the least. But perhaps more importantly, most Brits wouldn’t care even if they did prove to be true... Regular Brits might not care about the skin colour of their ancient forebears, but our cultural institutions clearly do. The BCA is a charity supported by, among others, Lambeth Council, the Paul Hamlyn Foundation and the British Film Institute. Until 2021, it was even working with the Home Office. Our educational institutions also seem keen on peddling identitarian falsehoods. In December last year, it emerged that some schoolkids across the UK were being falsely taught that St Hadrian of Canterbury – an abbot living in 7th-century England – was black. He wasn’t. He was born in Libya and was probably of Berber descent. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the BBC has also got in on the action. Beloved kids’ series Horrible Histories recently came out with a song called ‘Been Here From the Start’. The lyrics imply that black people have always maintained a significant presence in Britain. The supposedly educational, non-fiction show omits the fact that this is patently untrue. This obsession with inventing an alternative black British history is deeply unhealthy for all of us. For starters, there are plenty of black Britons who really were black and who really did make significant contributions to our history. Making demonstrably false claims about black people being the true natives of the British Isles both ignores the real black figures of British history and revives some pretty ugly nativist notions. As an organisation that claims to dedicate itself to both education and anti-racism, the Black Cultural Archives should know better than to spread this kind of divisive nonsense."
The first Britons were Black, exhibition on diverse history claims - "In 2018, it was announced that a genetic study of Cheddar Man, the oldest set of human remains to have been found in Briton, suggested that “giveaway” genes meant he likely had blue eyes and a range of possible skin pigmentations from “dark to black”... But the leader of the genetic study, Susan Walsh, clarified that Cheddar Man’s appearance was uncertain, while a separate 2017 study from geneticist Sarah Tishkoff found that predicting likely pigmentation based on “giveaway” genes was inaccurate... Cambridge historian Professor David Abulafia said: “The Brixton expo is new to me but the tendentious tone seems to be exactly what I would expect. I am totally nonplussed by the obsession with the skin colour of people in Britain’s remote past. “They are unlikely to have existed and even if they did they didn’t pass on their dark skin to modern Britons. Most black Britons are ultimately of African descent. “Judging people by skin colour is racist and I don’t understand why anyone of any colour would think it is desirable. “And that applies to diatribes against ‘white males’ as well as against black or brown people. “The presence of a very small number of Africans in this country over the two millennia up to the 19th century is exaggerated out of all proportion. And most of these ‘Africans’ were from the north of the continent and white or light brown.”"
Ukpahiojo James on X - "“Religion was invented to control people.” You really think men invented a religion that tells them to love their enemies, forgive those who hurt them, and pray for those who persecute them? ๐ค"
John Wright on X - "“Religion was invented to control people.” Only people who want to control people recite this absurdity: Revolutionaries, Anarchists, and Marxists. Because empty men cannot envision any other motive for anything. Christianity is abolished the slave trade, humbled emperors, curtailed kings, forbade usury, sanctified monogamy, banished pederasty, bestiality, and other perversions. Not only does it NOT control people, it preaches self control, and opposes every force of tyranny external and internal, secular or spiritual."
Meme - Metropolitan Police @metpoliceuk: "Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has responded to the unacceptable online abuse directed at a Met officer who received an award at yesterday's annual Police Federation Conference. PC Fiona Shaik Umar was recognised for the outstanding contribution she has made for women in policing."
Readers added context they thought people might want to know: "The vast majority of criticism was not because she is Muslim, but because she was not following very basic gun safety rules. Her finger was on the trigger and she pointed the barrel of the gun at a fellow officer."
Meme - "Women in Firearms Attachment *female police officer with finger on trigger, pointing gun at male colleague's thigh*"
Meme - jackie @SubccubusGirl: "i tried to donate blood today, i had an appointment, and they turned me away. apparently you still can’t donate blood if you’re on PrEP or had anal sex within 3 months? (both disqualified me) i thought they unbanned gays from donating? how is this not de facto discrimination?"
Readers added context they thought people might want to know: "US FDA blood donation guidelines apply the same individual risk-based questions to all donors regardless of orientation, deferring for recent anal sex with new/multiple partners or PrEP use to protect the blood supply as these can affect HIV detection."
Jail him for promoting homophobic stereotypes!
Meme - AG @AGHamilton29: "That awkward feeling where you’re a member of Congress parroting the same bogus talking points as neo-Nazis and they notice…"
Nicholas J. Fuentes @NickJFuentes: "AOC is more America First than 99% of Republicans."
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: "An unspoken secret in Congress is that much of the reflexive, blind, unconditional vote support for nearly any Israeli gov action isn't from actual agreement..."
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: "You are a white supremacist and I want nothing to do with you nor the world you imagine. I believe in a multiracial democracy, one of economic rights, civil liberties, and that affirms the working class and the rights of women and LGBTQ+ people. These are not small differences. They are irreconcilable. White supremacy is a scourge and must be disavowed in all places."
As left wingers keep telling us, if a Nazi is at the table with 9 others, there're 10 Nazis at the table
Jacqueline Thomsen on X - "New: A lawyer’s misconduct complaint against US District Judge Ada Brown stemmed from a hearing during which she repeatedly directed racial insults at him, according to documents reviewed by Bloomberg Law."
Mary Katharine Ham on X - "A judge bullies a lawyer she thinks is white, but is actually Latino, calling him a “chad” and “Mr. Social Media, Main Character Chad, White Hero, Savior, Loves to Help Black People Be An Ally.” The percentage of unhinged educated people one encounters these days is disconcerting. This account goes on and on. She doesn’t think she was out of line."
The Free Speech Union on X - "๐จ๐จ BREAKING NEWS: Blasphemy law is back — but it only applies to Muslims. FSU member and retired police officer Stephen Gray was found guilty of being "grossly offensive", a criminal offence under s127 of the Communications Act 2003, for repeating a joke about Mohammed. Stephen reposted a message he saw on Facebook that said: “Fun facts about bacon! People who eat bacon have a lower chance of marrying a 9 year old!” While giving evidence, Stephen explained that the post was a reference to the marriage between the Prophet Mohammed and Aisha — which was consummated when she was just nine years old, after he married her when she was six. Stephen said the post was intended to be satirical but he also hoped it would spark a serious debate: did that marriage, as recorded in the Hadiths, contribute to the acceptability of child marriage in Muslim countries? District Judge Steven Hood found the post to be “grossly offensive” and dismissed Stephen's defence that it was making a serious political point about the acceptability of child marriage. He found that the post was designed to be offensive and could not be making a serious point because it was light-hearted in nature. He concluded that a conviction would not amount to a disproportionate interference with Stephen’s right to freedom of expression. The Free Speech Union is helping Stephen appeal his conviction and has instructed a top criminal silk, John Beggs KC, to act for him. With your support, we hope to be able to pay for Stephen’s legal defence in the Crown Court and meet the costs of any further appeals. Please donate Stephen's crowdfunder in the link below. Earlier this year, the FSU paid for the defence of Hamit Coskun, who burnt a copy of the Quran outside the Turkish consulate in London. He was initially convicted, but we managed to get that conviction overturned on appeal. When the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) then tried to appeal the acquittal, we took them on and won again. More recently, the Free Speech Union threatened South Wales Police with legal action after it adopted a draconian version of the Government’s definition of anti-Muslim hostility, instructing officers to record any comment that went beyond “legitimate” discussion of Islam as a 'non-crime hate incident'. We won, and the force withdrew the guidance. Stephen’s case gives us another opportunity to reaffirm the principle that there is nothing illegal about criticising any religion, including Islam. It should not be a criminal offence to repost jokes about Islam that some Muslims find offensive. Read more below and please donate to our Crowdfunder ๐"
Basil the Great on X - "๐จNEWS: It has been revealed that Dr Farah Ahmed of Cambridge University previously wrote an article in which she claimed: "Muslims should study engineering and computers 'to produce advanced weaponry for Jihad in order that the deen [Islam] may dominate over all other" Is Cambridge going to fire her?"
The Food Professor on X - "The Canadian Press has seriously undermined its moral credibility. Using the September 11 attacks primarily as a vehicle for discussing Islamophobia demonstrates remarkably poor editorial judgment. Those attacks were perpetrated by 19 Islamist terrorists who murdered nearly 3,000 people, most of them Americans. For anyone old enough to remember September 11, the day remains profoundly painful and disturbing. Most of us remember exactly where we were when it happened. Anniversary coverage should focus first on the victims, the events themselves and how they changed the world forever—not subordinate that history to a contemporary political narrative. CP is not simply another newspaper: it is Canada’s national wire service. Its journalists produce stories that are distributed to subscribing newspapers, broadcasters and digital platforms across the country, where they may be published largely unchanged under a Canadian Press byline. That gives its editorial choices enormous reach. A questionable framing does not remain confined to one newsroom—it can be reproduced nationwide and presented as authoritative reporting. Canada faces a broader problem with the quality, balance and intellectual diversity of its media coverage. This may help explain the increasingly reflexive anti-Americanism shaping our public discourse. When a national wire service amplifies ideology instead of scrutinizing it, the effects reverberate throughout the entire media ecosystem. Informed debate suffers—and our democracy becomes more fragile by the day."
Brivael Le Pogam on X - "Here's how the system works. No conspiracy, no secret room. Something far more solid: a century of patience. It starts in an Italian prison. In the 1930s, Antonio Gramsci, locked up by Mussolini, tries to understand why the communist revolution failed in the West. The workers didn't follow. They were attached to their families, their faith, their homeland, their small property. His conclusion changed everything: you don't take power with rifles, you take it through culture. First you conquer the schools, the universities, the press, publishing, the theater. Once you control what people think, you don't need to seize the state. It falls on its own. In 1967, the German student leader Rudi Dutschke gave it a name: the long march through the institutions. In France, that march received a historic gift. At the Liberation, de Gaulle distrusted the communists. He refused them the Interior, Defense, and Foreign Affairs. He kept the sword but let the mind slip away. A commission chaired by two communists, Paul Langevin and then Henri Wallon, drew up the plan for France's postwar schools. The Communist Party presented itself as the party of the martyrs of the Resistance, and the intelligentsia fell in line: Sartre, Aragon, the journals, the publishing houses, the teachers' unions. The right kept the ministries, and the left took the minds. That was the founding mistake. People believed power lived in the state, when it actually lived in the heads of those who would run the state tomorrow. Then came May 68. From the intellectual ruins of that era, France gave the world Foucault, Derrida, and Deleuze, three brilliant minds who forged, in the elegance of our language, the weapon that would paralyze the West. Foucault taught that truth doesn't exist, only power relations disguised as knowledge. Derrida taught that texts have no stable meaning and that every reading is a betrayal. Deleuze taught that we should prefer desire to law, the nomad to the settler, becoming to being. Gramsci provided the strategy. French Theory provided the software. Those texts crossed the Atlantic. Yale, Berkeley, and Columbia absorbed them in the 80s, where they met American puritanism, its racial guilt, and its obsession with identity. Judith Butler read Foucault and invented performative gender. Edward Said read Foucault and invented postcolonialism. Then came intersectionality. The matrix was always the same: there is no truth, only power, so every hierarchy is suspect, every norm is violence, and every majority is guilty. The child of that marriage is called wokeism, and today it's coming back to us like a boomerang, in our own universities. Meanwhile, the infusion went on for forty years. A generation of professors trained a generation of journalists, judges, senior civil servants, and HR managers. Nobody needed to give orders. People came out of the same mold, hired those who thought like them, and pushed the others aside. That's what capturing an institution looks like: not a coup, but slow sedimentation. Above the nations, a structure was built that answers to no one. Europe, dreamed up as a common market among free peoples, became a machine for producing norms, directives, and regulations, far from voters, far from borders, far from reality. Today the loop is closed. In 2016, the Davos forum promoted a vision of 2030 summed up in one line: "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy." It came from a former Danish socialist minister. In Brussels, they passed the DSA, which turns platforms into auxiliaries of censorship. For years they've been negotiating a regulation that would allow your private messages to be scanned. They're preparing a digital ID and a digital euro. Every time with a nice justification, and every time with a little less freedom. And who's at the controls? Look at the rรฉsumรฉs. Emmanuel Macron was a card-carrying member of the Socialist Party before becoming Franรงois Hollande's economy minister. Gabriel Attal was a Socialist Party activist for ten years and learned the trade in a socialist minister's office. They changed labels, not software. That software rests on one belief: human beings are interchangeable, and so are cultures. Mass immigration isn't a problem, then. It's a step toward a finally equal world. They don't understand that it's impossible by design. A culture doesn't vanish into a vacuum. When a civilization gives up on itself, another one, more sure of itself, takes its place. This left courted political Islam as an electoral base and an ally against "the system." But political Islam shares none of its dreams. It doesn't want an equal, borderless world. It has its own project. Those who thought they could use it will end up devoured by it. The craziest part is that there are hardly any true believers left. Inside these institutions, almost nobody sincerely believes in the project anymore. No small group is pulling the strings. There are incentives: thousands of people whose salaries, status, grants, and careers depend on keeping the fiction alive. Admitting they were wrong would cost them their position, their prestige, their standard of living. So they prefer the collective lie. They double down on what doesn't work, because admitting failure would cost them more than carrying on. It's that dumb. People who understood nothing about economics or human nature built a system that only holds as long as nobody looks at it. So here is the real fight of our time. It isn't left versus right. It's a simpler question: what world do we want? The first is a world of strong nations and strong cultures that respect each other because they know who they are. A world that welcomes people through assimilation, not dissolution. The second is a world of total dilution, where every culture melts into a tasteless mush with no memory and no roots. They sell it to you as diversity, but it's the opposite. Real diversity is different peoples remaining themselves. A world where everyone is the same, everywhere, isn't diverse. It's uniform. And a uniform world is the easiest one to control. For a century, this system seemed unstoppable. It held the schools, the press, the culture, and the institutions. It lacked one thing: someone powerful enough that he couldn't be bought, who decided to look and say what he saw. Elon Musk did it, and I have high hopes that he'll be the one to finish this project off. The lie had a century. The truth only needs a moment."
M.A. Rothman | Facebook - "๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐
๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ “๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐”
Ms. Rachel told her millions of followers: ๐๐ฉ๐ช๐ด ๐ช๐ด ๐ณ๐ข๐ค๐ช๐ด๐ต, ๐ด๐ช๐ค๐ฌ, ๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ถ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ป๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐ช๐ด๐จ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ช๐ฏ๐จ. Her post claimed police were called on a 3-year-old Black boy because he was too good at soccer. Former NFL quarterback Robert Griffin III and attorney Ben Crump piled on. Griffin III wrote that ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ ๐-๐ฒ๐๐๐ซ-๐จ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ๐จ ๐ ๐จ๐จ๐ was ridiculous, and also claimed the family had been escorted off the field with a trespass notice. Then the body cam footage and 911 audio came out. League director Thomas Hayes, who is also Black, told officers the parents were causing a disturbance and he wanted them removed. He said he had subbed the boy out so other kids could play, and that the boy was pushing other children. Hayes also said the boy was exceptionally talented and had scored plenty of goals. Winter Park police said the call was about the parents, and that ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ข๐ด ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ข๐ฏ๐บ ๐ด๐ถ๐จ๐จ๐ฆ๐ด๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ต ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ข๐ญ๐ญ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ญ๐ช๐ค๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ข๐ด ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ต๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ช๐ญ๐ฅ'๐ด ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ง๐ช๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ข๐ญ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต. They also said nobody was arrested, trespassed, or forced to leave the park. The boy's mother, Martasia Griffin, told officers on video: ๐๐ฉ๐ฆ๐บ'๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ช๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐บ ๐ฌ๐ช๐ค๐ฌ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ฉ๐ช๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ต ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ด ๐ฑ๐ญ๐ข๐ค๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ค๐ข๐ถ๐ด๐ฆ ๐ฉ๐ฆ'๐ด ๐จ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฅ ๐ข๐ต ๐ด๐ฐ๐ค๐ค๐ฆ๐ณ. The league, i9 Sports, says it is reviewing the incident and has contacted the family. By then the outrage had already gone viral, built on a version of events that the police and the recordings ๐๐จ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ. ๐๐ก๐ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ ๐ ๐ฐ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐ฏ๐ข๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ. ๐๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ซ — ๐๐ก๐๐๐ค ๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ซ๐."
This doesn't deter all the disgusting grifters like Ms Rachel. But then, there is no left wing bandwagon she won't shamelessly jump on
Emmanuel Ruimy on X - "Il y a quand mรชme une diffรฉrence entre l'extrรชme droite et l'extrรชme gauche qui m'a toujours fascinรฉ.
L'extrรชme droite dit ce qu'elle est. Rรฉactionnaire, ultra-conservatrice ou xรฉnophobe : elle ne s'en cache absolument pas. Quand Zemmour dรฉclare qu'on ne peut pas รชtre franรงais en ayant un prรฉnom musulman, c'est choquant, mais au moins on sait ร quoi s'en tenir.
L'extrรชme gauche, c'est l'inverse exact. Elle fait le contraire de ce qu'elle proclame.
- Elle se dit antifasciste. Et ce sont des miliciens cagoulรฉs, se rรฉclamant de l'antifascisme, qui sont aujourd'hui mis en examen pour avoir lynchรฉ ร mort un jeune homme de 23 ans sur un trottoir de Lyon.
- Elle se dit anticonformiste. Mais elle vit dans des microcosmes sociaux trรจs fermรฉs, oรน l'on parle le mรชme langage codรฉ, et oรน le moindre รฉcart vous vaut l'exclusion.
- Elle se dit antiraciste, mais elle trie les gens en « racisรฉs » et en « blancs » et organise des rรฉunions interdites ร certains selon leur origine.
- Elle se dit du cรดtรฉ du pluralisme et du contre-pouvoir. Mais elle bloque des confรฉrences, fait annuler des intervenants ร l'universitรฉ, rรฉclame le boycott des mรฉdias qui lui dรฉplaisent, arrive ร faire censurer un journaliste sur un mรฉdia de service public.
En rรฉsumรฉ, l'extrรชme droite dit ce qu'elle veut faire, l'extrรชme gauche fait le contraire de ce qu'elle veut dire."
NHS invites white staff to take £250 ‘disrupt racism’ course - "An NHS trust has suggested its white staff sign up to a “disrupt racism” course. Staff at Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in Swindon, Wiltshire, were sent a newsletter encouraging them to sign up to a programme for “white-identifying individuals” called From Allies to Disruptors. The course, from equality charity Brap, was one of a list of activities suggested to NHS staff for black history month. The letter says the £250 course, which involves six half-day online workshops and runs from November until April 2027, is designed for “individuals who are white and live in the world as white people”. “By understanding more about racialised dynamics, the programme will help you become a more confident disruptor of racism,” it says... Dr Alka Sehgal Cuthbert, a director at Don’t Divide Us, a campaign group opposing racial identity politics, said it was “time to call enough on schemes like this”. She said: “It’s not only, or primarily, a question of wasted money and time; the embedded beliefs being promoted: that Britain is systemically and/or institutionally racist against black or brown ethnic minorities, and that white people need to be more effective ‘disruptors of racism’, actively sow grievance, division, entitlement and make solidarity more difficult.” “We need to be finding ways of building social bonds, not tearing them apart. No public institution should be outsourcing their moral responsibility – not to mention money – to address problems, where they exist and can be evidenced, to charities or companies who act in sectional rather than public interests,” Dr Cuthbert added."
Damn Tory underfunding destroying the NHS!
