Links - 27th September 2026 (2 - Women: Lindsay Clancy)

Lindsay Clancy's trial has superfans rallying around her - "Dressed in pink, around 300 women gathered outside a Massachusetts courthouse on Thursday wearing shirts emblazoned with slogans such as “Believe”, “She Needed Help”, and “Peace For Lindsay”. The protesters prayed and made heart shapes with their hands. Some held up flags from across the world; others cradled babies. The woman whom they, and scores of others at rallies across the globe, including the UK, Portugal and Peru, had turned out to support? Lindsay Clancy, the mother accused of murdering her three children aged 3, 5 and 8 months. Ms Clancy, a 36-year-old nurse, does not deny killing Cora, Dawson and Callan by strangling them with exercise bands. However, she claims that it was not murder because she was suffering from postpartum psychosis at the time... Ms Clancy’s case has prompted a reckoning by those who think she was failed by the system, with many women throwing their support behind her and holding her up as an example of failing mental health support for new mothers. Ms Clancy has been made into something of a feminist symbol – for her supporters, her story shows how extreme circumstances must become before a conversation about mental health, and particularly new mothers’ mental health, is taken seriously. “Lindsay shouldn’t even be on trial right now; the systems of mental health care should be,” Renee Kimball, the organiser of the Massachusetts protest, said... The case has swept across social media, with 31,000 people contributing more than $1m (£740,000) to a GoFundMe account for Ms Clancy’s parents Mike and Paula Musgrove, and triggered a wave of op-eds, podcasts and TikTok videos of people sharing their “hot takes”... The case has attracted a wave of increasingly outlandish conspiracy theories, with some online convinced it was Mr Clancy who committed the murders. He has not been charged and is not accused of any wrongdoing. His new wife, Rachel Danis, bears a resemblance to his former wife, according to some on social media. Others claim that an apparent change of his shoes, according to CCTV from the night the children died, points to some kind of involvement. A day does not go by without social media sleuths apparently decoding some small detail – a nod of the head in Ms Clancy’s direction by his mother-in-law, or a review left by Mr Clancy for a hiking trail in Costa Rica – as evidence of the father’s involvement."

Meme - Matt Walsh: "Shocking to see the number of women on social media now confessing openly that they understand and can relate to Lindsay Clancy's desire to strangle her children to death. I guess I shouldn't be surprised, given the ubiquity of abortion. But still, this is dark. Very dark."
Paige Hailyn: "This fucking guy has some nerve. So imma just say this LOUD AND MOTHER FUCKING CLEAR UNLESS YOU HAVE BEEN THRIUGH PPD OR PPP YOURSELF THEN YOU NEED TO SIT THE FUCK DOWN AND STFU!! RESPECTFULLY! And if you dont understand why I say that than you can stfu too. Disrespectfully 😘"
Joshua Champion: "The woman in question murdered her own children. That's what you're defending."
Paige Hailyn: "i honestly dont think she did. But even if she did it could have been avoided. She was failed by her doctors and her husband"

Matt Walsh on X - "Can even just one of Lindsay Clancy’s defenders point to just one case where they defended a man who murdered his family on the basis that he had mental health problems? Can you give me just one case? No? Not one? Of all the crazy men who’ve killed their families you never shed a single tear of sympathy for any of them? Literally the only time you defend child killers is when they’re women? Oh. Okay. I think we’re all starting to see what’s really going on here. Thanks.
If the dad had done this instead of the mom, not one of these people would be coming to his defense. Not one. They really do think that killing children is excusable when women do it. Words can’t even describe just how depraved that mindset is. But given the 60 million+ abortions in this country since Roe, it’s not surprising."

Matt Walsh on X - "Lindsay Clancy had a "psychotic break." Which is why she planned the murder, researched her plan on Google, sent her husband away from the house, and then methodically executed her children over the course of several minutes. I never knew that you could plan your psychotic break like that. Just pencil it into your calendar. I'm learning so much about "mental health" from the morally bankrupt imbeciles on this site and TikTok. Thank you for this education."

Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️🇷🇺 on X - "AND I WAS RIGHT HAHAHAHA. PPD (Wh*re depression) is entirely due to wh*redom and the modern de-feminisation of young women:
- PPD is negatively correlated with AFS (Age at first sexual intercourse)
- PPD is positively correlated with LNSP (body count)
IT'S OVER FOR ROASTOIDS!"

Tanner Cartwright 🇺🇸 on X - "A man could lose his job, find out his wife has been cheating on him, is leaving with his kids because he has cancer and if he got frustrated and slapped her around, there is not a single woman in America would defend or make excuses for him. But if a woman gets the baby blues and strangles her children to death as they struggle and fight her, women everywhere start talking about how bad postpartum depression is. Mark my words, you are creating the most misogynistic generation of men to ever live and you need to know it is all your fault."
If you don't excuse a mother murdering her children, you're a misogynist

OutspokenSamantha on X - "When men commit crimes - they're guilty. When women commit crimes - men are guilty. That's the message from modern women. Always the victim. Never the problem. It's embarrassing."

Lauren Chen on X - "Patric Clancy supported his family financially so Lindsay could stay home. He hired a nanny. He took months of paternity leave and then worked from home to be more present for his wife and children. These women will blame everyone but Lindsay for the murders she committed."

FRONTLINES TPUSA on X - "HAPPENING NOW: A crowd of female protesters gathered outside Plymouth Superior Court applauded Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, thanking him for his work defending Clancy, who is accused of killing her three children. @Bodittle | @TPUSA"
Auron MacIntyre on X - "“Young men have been radicalized by the internet” Meanwhile hundreds of women gather to cheer for a literal child murderer"

Meme - "a woman just killed her 3 children. Here's why its THE MANS FAULT"
Man hater (brunette) passing you a note: "1. Women were oppressed for centuries
2. The mans DNA was on household items in HIS house
3. She gave birth so her kill count was -3 to begin with so its 0 now
4. Her sign is Leo and "Leos don't kill their cubs""

Lisa Fendragon on X - "We've come full circle to radical feminists arguing that women are driven psychotic by female hormones, and therefore can't be expected to have agency. 100 years of women's rights, up in smoke. Just like that"

Dr. Abby Johnson on X - "“Women just don’t kill their children like that.” I keep hearing women say this while discussing the Lindsay Clancy case. But the rallying of support around a woman who strangled her children should not surprise us. For more than 50 years, our culture has insisted that women should have the right to end the lives of their own children…deliberately, legally, and with the full-throated defense of much of the public. So perhaps the shocking part isn’t that people can find a way to defend a mother who killed her children. Perhaps the shocking part is that we still pretend we haven’t spent decades teaching women that, under the right circumstances, killing your own child can be justified."
There're pro choice people who defend infanticide too, so

Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌✡️ on X - "Here is a list of 20 men who murdered family members and were found not guilty by reason of insanity. Funny, but I don’t remember any furor over any of these decisions, not even number 3..."
Wilfred Reilly on X - "This is because crowds of men were not rallying in support of them, waving babies and blaming post-war PTSD or whatever."

Lauren Chen | Facebook - "The support for Lindsay Clancy has honestly radicalized me against modern women. A fundraiser for Clancy has raised over $1 million. Materialism, substance abuse, promiscuity, abortion. Now triple child murder? Is there no sin the feminine hivemind WON'T embrace? Feeling very... dejected? I don't even know how to describe it. I love being a woman and a mom. I know a lot of great women and moms. But there's a specific type of 2026 woman who is so inexcusably selfish, desperate for attention, and lacking in accountability that it honestly makes my head spin. I've previously thought they were a small minority on social media, but seeing the mass psychosis over Lindsay Clancy... I don't think they're that small a minority any more. It's been very blackpilling"

Kali Fontanilla on X - "Liberal women are arguing that Lindsay Clancy shouldn’t be held responsible for killing her children because she was on psychotropic medications, had a hormonal imbalance, was postpartum, and had a husband who “didn’t do enough.” But these same women want a woman-run country. So how does that work? If a hormonal imbalance or common medications can supposedly make a woman incapable of being held responsible for her actions, why would we want women making decisions for an entire country?🤔"
The left want to destroy civilisation, after all

Collin Rugg on X - Licensed therapist defends Lindsay Clancy, who murdered her three children, because “many of us see ourselves in Lindsay.” “Many of us know that we could have been only one step away from [murdering our children]” This woman, and anyone else who thinks like this, belongs in a mental institution."

Meme - "Fellas, would you rather your child be alone in the woods with a TikTok Mom or a Bear?"

New York Post on X - "Video shows evil dad Chad Doerman telling cops he executed his 3 young sons 'for God'"
Matt Walsh on X - "The father in this case, who is now in prison for the rest of his life and as far as I’m concerned should be executed, actually has a MUCH more convincing “insanity” defense. He killed his sons because he believed God wanted him to do it. When the cops arrived he was rambling incoherently and confessed to the crimes on the basis that he was doing what God wanted. He did not magically snap in and out of his psychosis. He was still clearly psychotic when the police questioned him. And yet you’ll notice that not a single woman on TikTok or anywhere else is expressing any sympathy for this guy. And certainly no men are rallying to his defense either. He went to prison, as he should, with no fanfare or fan clubs. That’s because Clancy’s female defenders don’t actually care about mental health or postpartum depression or anything else. They just simply think it’s okay for women (and only women) to kill their kids. That’s all."

Ned Kelly on X - "In the ancient Greek city of Miletus, there was a high-profile suicide by a young woman. And (because depression and suicide are psychogenic illnesses) some other Milesian maiden saw the attention she got, and committed suicide herself, and pretty soon they had a suicide epidemic. How did it end, you ask? Well, they tried everything, but the young women affected by this epidemic of madness seemed immune to reason. And then the leader of the city decreed that the next suicide would be stripped naked and left hanging in the city center to be leered at, and then rot. “How humiliating!”, you say. “How cruel! How inhuman!” But that was the last suicide in Miletus."

Meme - "TikTok Moms with Postpartum Depression fighting the family Pitbull to decide who gets to unalive the children"

Meme - Purple-haired DOGE with horn-rimmed glasses and septum ring: "I can't even murder my kids and blame it on pipipopo depression. This is literally like that movie, the handjob's tale"

Meme - "If this Clancy trial is showing us anything it's ladies PLEASE do not marry a loser. Yes, it is THAT serious."
Luka @LukaLev: "I don't think that's quite what its showing"
C @c27662: "If this Clancy trial has showed us anything, its is that females in the 20th century would rather murder their children and blame everyone around them over taking accountability. Wild. If this doesnt make you want to stay abstinent eh."

Steve 🇺🇸 on X - "It’s with a sad heart that I have to post this but every single ICE agent in the country has been diagnosed with postpartum depression. Whatever happens, happens."

Women use therapy to avoid personal accountability / responsibility : r/PurplePillDebate - "In recent years, "therapy" has become a buzzword, especially among women, as a means of self-care, emotional healing, and personal growth. However, a concerning pattern emerges—many women seem to approach therapy with the assumption that they are never the problem, but rather the victims of the men in their lives.
1. The Assumption That Men Are Always the Culprits
Many women advocate for therapy, not as a space for self-reflection but as a tool to "fix" the men in their lives. They encourage boyfriends, husbands, fathers, or brothers to seek therapy under the presumption that these men are the root cause of instability or toxicity. Rarely do they enter therapy with the same level of scrutiny toward their own behavior. Instead, the narrative often focuses on how others have harmed them, reinforcing a cycle of victimhood rather than accountability.
2. Overlooking Their Own Role in Conflict
Interactions are rarely one-sided. Yet, when discussing past relationships, workplace struggles, or family tensions, many women position themselves as the innocent party while labeling men as emotionally unavailable, immature, or manipulative. If their relationships repeatedly end in chaos, or they find themselves constantly surrounded by "toxic" people, at what point should they consider that they might be the common denominator? Therapy should be about recognizing one’s own contribution to dysfunction—not just diagnosing others.
3. Therapy as a Justification Rather Than a Solution
Another issue is the way therapy is sometimes used as a justification for bad behavior rather than a means to correct it. Instead of saying, "I need to work on how I handle conflict," it's often, "My therapist told me I should cut out people who don’t serve me." This mindset can lead to an unwillingness to engage in difficult but necessary conversations, instead opting to label others as "toxic" and walk away, rather than address personal flaws.
4. The "Healing Journey" That Never Ends
While self-improvement is a lifelong process, some women treat their "healing journey" as an indefinite excuse for why they can’t be held accountable. If a man reacts emotionally, he is unstable; if a woman does, she is "processing trauma." If a man struggles with communication, he "needs therapy"; if a woman struggles, she’s just “protecting her peace.” The double standard creates a situation where therapy is used to reaffirm biases rather than challenge them."

Shane Jerominski on X - "What I learned from the Lindsay Clancy trial: everything in life is worse with a terrible spouse. The system failed her, but if she’d had a husband who was advocating, demanding, and refusing to leave until she got the care she needed the world might never have known her name."

Ricky Vaughn on X - "Strange how the voices in a woman's head never seem to say, do the dishes, give your husband a blow job. It's always, 'kill the kids'. So strange."
Naomi Seibt on X - "I fear my voices are saying “Repeal the 19th”"

Meme - "When you tell women they can't murder their kids because they got a case of the sads *upset Inde Navarrette (Nikki Freeman) in Obsession*"

alyssa on X - "All the Lindsay Clancy supporters screaming “Patrick didn’t help her enough” are the same women that preach that they don’t need a man to help or take care of them."

The Lindsay Clancy murder trial exposes MAGA lies - "Having kids is easy, and anyone who says otherwise is an ugly feminist trying to scare other women out of their only true source of joy and fulfillment: This is the narrative that has grown up in the MAGA movement in recent years."
From Amanda Marcotte. No wonder.
It's amazing what feminists will stoop to: weaponising a triple murder to push their agenda

I Am Leah on X - "“Lindsay Clancy didn’t have support!” She had multiple therapists, psychiatrists, her parents, his parents, daily daycare for the older two, and a NANNY that stayed with her for 5 hours A DAY three days a week while her husband was WORKING FROM HOME. How much more support could she have been given?"
Lynne Platt on X - "The amount of help and support she had is outrageous for a grown woman. Her attorney arguing that it wasn’t enough is the most privileged statement ever. She is a spoiled rich woman who wanted to hang out with her husband at night, sleep for 8 hours then spend an hour and half on herself every morning. I have never had that, and it’s crazy I didn’t kill my kids. She is a narcissist who couldn’t handle the responsibility of a family, so she killed them."

Thread by @MattWalshBlog on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "The fact that she’s even trying to evade punishment is proof enough that she wasn’t “insane” when she committed the crime. If a loving parent woke up from a psychotic stupor and found out they’d done something like that, they’d beg the state to execute them. They wouldn’t want to be found not guilty. They’d want to be punished to the fullest extent possible. They wouldn’t even ask for a lawyer. “I’m guilty. Either kill me or throw me in the darkest dungeon you have.” That’s all they’d say. And frankly it wouldn’t even get to that point because they would have made sure to commit suicide successfully when they had the chance. There’s no way any good, loving parent would sit through a trial and actually offer a defense for their own actions after strangling their beautiful children to death. Granted, no loving parent would commit that crime in the first place. But I’m saying that even according to the defense’s version of the case — that she was a “good mother” who went insane and had no control — her actions AFTER the crime don’t add up. And the other thing ANY loving parent would do if they suddenly regained sentience and realized they’d done this: CALL THE POLICE YOURSELF. Report what you’ve done. Hold your children close and try desperately to revive them. What you would never do is just leave the kids facedown on the basement floor, make some half assed suicide attempt, leave it to your spouse to call the police, and then wake up in the hospital and ask for a lawyer. This selfish piece of shit hated her kids. If she hated herself half as much, she wouldn’t be alive right now."

Meme - Woman driving car: "And that's why women choose the bear."
Girl at back: "Because men are scary?"
Woman: "Exactly. I'd trust a woman first"
Boy at back to girl: "Unless she has postpartum depression?"

Meme - "THE SLIPPERY SLOPE
You can't kill the unborn *tradwife*
Safe, legal and rare *tradwife in pink top/dress*
16 weeks at the latest *Daddy's girl without the slogan on her top*
Straight up to full term *Daddy's girl*
*Lindsay Clancy* YOU ARE HERE"

Meme - NPCs in Pink Pussy Hats: "BELIEVE ALL WOMEN"
Lindsay Clancy: "I KILLED THEM"
Upset NPCs in Pink Pussy Hats: "IT WAS THE HUSBAND!!"

Meme - "Kids hearing their mom say she supports Lindsay Clancy. *apprehensive kid*"

Meme - Brett Lee @real_brett_lee: "So if Lindsay did what she did to YOUR children you'd excuse the evil because she had PPD, was on tons of meds, and the system failed her? How about all the school sh00ters who were also depressed and heavily medicated? They get a pass too? Or the psychotic homeless man who slits a random woman's throat on a bus? Should we excuse it because he just had a psychotic break and didn't get the help he needed?"

Meme - Jack Napier: "Think about it."
"IF WOMEN REALLY THOUGHT PATRICK CLANCY KILLED HIS KIDS THEY WOULD BE TRYING TO FUCK HIM"

Meme - Jean Gray with Septum Ring: "I don't understand why so many men are obsessed with the fact that some woman 'allegedly' murdered her kids."
Cyclops: "Well instead of it being three children, imagine it was someone you care about... Like a black rapists or something."

Meme - "MOTHER PULLS ALL 6 OF HER CHILDREN OUT OF RAGING HOUSE FIRE, GOING BACK IN THREE TIMES DESPITE BURNS COVERING 93% OF HER BODY.
Money Raised $42,000
MOTHER KILLS ALL 3 OF HER CHILDREN BY STRANGLING THEM TO DEATH WITH EXERCISE BANDS. CLAIMS SHE IS VICTIM.
Money Raised $1,044,318+"

Freedomain - with Stefan Molyneux, MA on X - "Brothers, you've GOT to stop appeasing women. Patrick Clancy worked from home, made hundreds of thousands of dollars, told his wife to stay home, got her healthcare and mental health care, hired a nanny, went with her to every doctor's visit, paid tens of thousands of dollars for daycare, took extended paternal leaves, and begged people to forgive his wife right after she murdered his three children... And is STILL being blamed for not doing enough. It's a hole with no bottom. Stop dying trying to fill it"

Christina Aguayo News | Facebook - "#new Lindsay Clancy's ex-husband said she called him from the hospital - a week after she k*lled their kids - and did not mention the kids, or apologize but instead focused only on herself #Massachusetts Clancy used exercise bands to strangle 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 8-month-old Callan to death. Cora and Dawson were pronounced dead that night; Callan died three days later in the hospital. #newyork Patrick Clancy testified that she called him from the hospital and spent the entire conversation making excuses for herself, saying she heard a man’s voice that told her if she did not act then she would lose her chance. She said nothing about Cora, Dawson, or Callan. She did not apologize, she did not show remorse, she didn't say the kids' names, she didn't even mention the kids. #hospital Patrick divorced the woman who m*rdered his kids. On January 24, 2023, Patrick came home after being sent out on errands by Lindsay. He found her in the yard and called 911. On the recorded call, played for the jury, he can be heard asking where the children were. She told him 'The basement' without saying they were dead. In the call you can hear him howling for minutes when he started finding the kids one by one - then screams of “She killed the kids” filled the courtroom. When he found Dawson in his office, he cried 'my little buddy, my buddy' Officials suspect that Dawson ran to his father's office for protection, not knowing he wasn't there. That's when his mother Lindsay, caught him and strangled him to de*th. Lindsay Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three counts of first-degree m*rder. Her defense admits she killed the children but argues she was not criminally responsible because severe postpartum mental illness, medication overload, and claimed auditory hallucinations. Prosecutors say the killings were deliberate and premeditated, pointing to her mapping out how long Patrick would take on the errands. Evidence of online searches including "can you treat a sociopath?" days before the killing. In addition, the State's psychiatrist who treated Lindsay testified that she did not suffer a psychotic break, she did not have post-partum, and she admitted that she was not taking the mixture of medications. Patrick testified that he never once heard Lindsay talk about hearing any voices. She first made those claims about 2 weeks after the m*rders. Many are asking: If Lindsay walked into your home, and strangled your children to death would you excuse the m*rders because she allegedly had postpartum depression and too many meds? #ChristinaAguayoNews"

Briana Theroux | Facebook - "The Lindsay Clancy case has exposed something I find deeply disturbing about the way people talk about women, mental illness, and responsibility. Three children were strangled to death by their mother, and somehow a significant number of women have managed to make her the emotional center of the story. My position on insanity is pretty simple. I do not think insanity fundamentally changes the public safety question. If you are capable of murdering three children because you are psychotic, you are dangerous. If you are capable of murdering three children while completely sane, you are dangerous. The mechanism may be different. The social consequence should not be. Mental illness can explain behavior. It does not erase the behavior, resurrect the victims, or eliminate the danger that person has demonstrated. Explanation is not exoneration. For clarity, I am not in favor of the death penalty for anyone. That is a separate moral philosophy of mine. But I absolutely believe that people who demonstrate that they are profoundly unsafe for a functioning society should be removed from it. And this was not simply someone impulsively snapping. There was organization and forethought surrounding what happened. Methodical, sustained planning is not a hallmark of an acute psychotic break. Planning alone does not rule out psychosis, but organized behavior, concealment, forethought, and apparent awareness of consequences are all highly relevant when evaluating the claim that someone had completely lost contact with reality. Lindsay displayed all of these. You do not get to wave all of that away by saying “postpartum.” And the hormone argument is even worse. Hormones can influence mood, arousal, anxiety, aggression, sexual motivation, and cognition, often through the lens of preexisting beliefs. But influence is not compulsion. Hormones do not mechanically force people to murder. If you genuinely believe they do, apply that logic consistently. A man with high testosterone has biological influences affecting sexual motivation, dominance, and aggression. If he rapes or assaults someone, are you going to say his hormones made him do it? Of course you fucking aren’t. And you shouldn’t. Because biological influence does not eliminate agency. You cannot demand that women be treated as fully autonomous adults while simultaneously resurrecting the oldest argument imaginable about female biology making us irrational and incapable of controlling ourselves whenever accountability becomes uncomfortable. And stop conflating postpartum depression with postpartum psychosis. They are not the same thing. Women experience postpartum depression every day without murdering their children. Using a woman who strangled all three of hers as some kind of martyr for ordinary women struggling postpartum is not compassionate advocacy. It is unbelievably poorly thought out. If anything, you are giving vulnerable women another reason not to seek help. Imagine being scared to admit you are depressed, anxious, having intrusive thoughts, or struggling after birth because social media has rhetorically bundled ordinary postpartum mental health problems together with women murdering their babies. Brilliant advocacy🤡 What disturbs me most is how quickly people can look at three dead children and start constructing a rationale for the adult who killed them. If that is your immediate moral instinct, something is seriously wrong with your priorities and mindset. Seek help yourself. Now. You can advocate for better maternal mental health care. Please do. But that does not require turning the person who brutally killed three children into a martyr. Whether someone is criminally malicious or catastrophically insane, if they have demonstrated that they are profoundly unsafe for other human beings, society has every right to protect itself from them. And let’s remember, the children should be the center of this story. Not the woman who killed them."

Christina Aguayo News | Facebook - "#new The psychiatrist who testified that Lindsay Clancy knew right from wrong when she strangled her three kids to de*th, is no long employed by Nemours Children’s Health in Delaware #massachusetts Nemours’ Delaware Valley division confirmed that Dr. Avram Mack “Is no longer employed by Nemours Children’s Health.” They did not give a reason why he was no longer employed, saying employment decisions are confidential. #delaware Mack was reportedly fired or resigned the same day he finished testifying by Zoom after a combative cross-examination. Patients were later notified that their appointments were being moved to other doctors. His departure from the hospital and his testimony have not officially been confirmed. Mack was called by prosecutors as a rebuttal witness. He evaluated Clancy after she k*lled her kids. After reviewing records and speaking with her directly, he told jurors she suffered a major depressive episode as part of major depressive disorder. He said he found no mania, no hypomania, and no psychosis and concluded that she retained the capacity to know right from wrong when k*lling her kids. Defense lawyer Kevin Reddington spent hours attacking those conclusions. He pressed Mack on the timing of postpartum conditions, challenged his experience treating postpartum psychosis, and accused him of smiling or smirking during questioning. The judge had to intervene. Mack stood by his finding that Clancy was in a serious psychiatric state and suffering, but still criminally responsible. The jury deliberated for 10 hours before being sent home for the weekend. #christinaaguayonews"

Sarah Fields on X - "I cannot believe I’m saying this, but if Lindsay Clancy is found not guilty by a jury with nine women on it, I might actually be radicalized into supporting the repeal of the 19th. I vote often, and I vote consistently. But at this point, it might be a sacrifice I’m willing to make - if I thought it would even make a difference. Liberal women are destroying America. And protecting children is above all else for me."

Kangmin Lee | 이강민 on X - "Women are waking up. The silver lining of the Lindsay Clancy case is that the women who aren't supporting Lindsay are finally realizing men weren't just being edgelords when we suggested repealing the 19th amendment. It's because we care about protecting women from the worst of their impulses and children. Women have their own giftings that men will never have, but it's never oriented towards governance, justice, and the exercise of power (force). Our forebears understood this for thousands of years, it's utter hubris to think human nature doesn't change"
The Disdainful Duke 🇬🇧 on X - "Women vote to dissolve the country and kill civilisation. Men do not. Open borders, two-tier & nanny-state policing, abortion as default, transing kids. That is how women aged 18–50 actually vote. If only they voted, Britain would be a communist one-party state with no border. In 2020, women alone would have handed Biden 462–76. That is the average woman in the age group that now decides elections, not a few mentally ill extremists. Same pattern in court. Men do not treat infant murder as bravery. Enough women do (or excuse it) that a nine-woman jury is a real risk. Running a country (or civilisation) means force, borders, and hard judgment. Female nature is not built for that. Our ancestors knew it. The vote numbers and the Clancy case are the same fact in two rooms. Repeal the 19th or women will successfully end civilisation."

Melissa Chen on X - "I don’t understand. For decades, feminists have argued that women have full control over their minds and that even pointing out mood changes during a cycle is just male misogyny. Now, that entire argument is getting thrown out the window because the Lindsay Clancy defense is literally claiming in open court that hormones can turn someone into a deranged psychopath capable of child murder. It’s wild to watch that narrative completely flip. A not-guilty finding based on hormones and insanity would have crazy implications. For example, if hormonal states can legally erase accountability, why wouldn’t they also affect fitness for jobs, high-pressure decisions, firearms, and parenting? Courts cannot treat a woman as legally insane for the worst possible act and then pretend the same reasoning has no implications anywhere else. Also, Lindsay Clancy is no more insane than Jeffrey Dahmer, who was diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, and a psychotic disorder, and yet, he was still declared legally sane at trial. For the sake of those children, and for the sake of all the good that’s in this world, I hope the jury makes the only sensible decision here"

The Left's Idea of "Harassment" / 'Victims' Cheering for Murder

The Critical Drinker: Josh Downham - "Typical woke logic. They attack people, they tell people f--- you, and they think it's strange to get combative people in the comments section. These people don't live in reality. It's probably why so many have mental problems."
The Salon | A Star Trek Podcast @SalonTrek: "In a surprise to no one the comments proved the point, and we had to turn them off. We're not gonna let hate just sit in our replies. Again, fuck you."
The Salon | A Star Trek Podcast @SalonTrek: "A message for the trolls who will pop out of their trash cans to take credit & delight in today's Star Trek news:
FUCK YOU"

When left wingers complain about "harassment" what they often mean is that they attacked their enemies and then got criticised in return.

This is no surprise, really, since Israel defending itself against jihadist attacks is "genocide".

Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens: "These people will cheer for your murder and then cry about how much of a victim they are."
pastel shark @sharkothrasher: "Oh boo hoo Charlie "headshot" Kirk is dead"
pastel shark 🏳️‍⚧️🦈 @sharkothrasher: "Can black and trans people rest without yall mocking their deaths holy fuck its like the cruelty is y'alls only entertainment"

Links - 27th September 2026 (1 [including Francesca Hong])

Peter Bernegger on X - "Francesca Hong was diagnosed with 1) bipolar disease, 2) had a mental breakdown, 3) was placed in psychiatric hospitalization, 4) did self-harm by cutting, and 5) experienced a lithium overdose. My source: Francesca Hong in a 2023 interview. Her own words. She is running for Governor in Wisconsin (D). @DavidCCrowley @TomTiffanyWI @joeltbrennan @VickiMcKenna @DanODonnellShow @TiffanyWarRoom @RegJoeShow @JayWeber3 @EricLDaugh @EmeraldRobinson @DanEastman2023 @doranchad @bgalsWI @MattWhitlock @amuse It's always in the eyes...."
Rising serpent 🇺🇸 on X - "Oh, good. Everyone knows the Democrat party could be even more successful if they doubled up on their quota of batshit insane mentally defective women who are also commies and immigrants."

Hon. Vickie Paladino on X - "The left will gladly elevate absolute lunatics to high office, and they think it’s funny. Once again, everything they do is designed to undermine and dismantle our country. Installing comically unqualified mental patients into power is just another tactic to bring about our end."

Meme - Greg Price @greg_price11: "Hilarious."
"When reached for comment, a spokesperson for Hong rejected Tiffany's accusations. "Tom Tiffany is once again telling lies and inventing quotes, because he can't run on his record. Rep. Hong has never called for abolishing the U.S. Senate. Tiffany cannot produce a single statement where she did, because it doesn't exist. She has spoken about police and prison abolition in the past as an aspirational goal,"
Francesca Hong For Governor @FrancescaHongWI: Feb 13, 2021: "Abolish the Senate."

Richard Hanania on X - "Democrats are not only picking socialists as candidates, but general losers in life. Francesca Hong, likely to be the next candidate for governor in Wisconsin, was sued just this year by Capitol One for $30,000 in unpaid bills. Poor, overeducated malcontents are the DSA base."

Meme - Cathy Young 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱 @CathyYoung63: "Not sure if this is Woke 1.0 or Woke 2.0, but "an Asian-American woman who dates or marries a white person is trying to assimilate into the majority" is bonkers and deeply distasteful"
Briahna Joy Gray @briebriejoy: "I'm sorry what's the issue here? She's talking about how she hasn't always been attuned to the concerns other POC communities faced bc she was focused on assimilation into the white majority, as evidenced by her romantic choices. Presumably, she's glad she has more consciousness now that she stands to represent a diverse cohort. If you object to this, why?"
Greg Price @greg_price11: "Francesca Hong describes having a half white son as "being in proximity to whiteness""
Left wing logic - miscegenation is racist

Meme - Jack Posoblec @JackPosobiec: "The anti-white hate is off the charts"
Francesca Hong for Governor: "White male chefs.... before you sign up for charity gigs and shit that's going give you good press... look around the room and check if there is someone that
1) you haven't shared a meal with
2) doesn't have the same genitals
3) has nicer skin than you"

Meme - KangminLee @kangminlee: "Radical in the streets, colonized in the sheets. Every time with boba libs"

Nintendo of America really did suggest giving Pikachu large feminine breasts at one point, Japanese media confirms

Mosque donation money allegedly spent on escort services - "Vienna is facing a serious scandal after reports that donations collected by a Diyanet mosque were not used for religious purposes, but instead spent on escort services and parties. According to the Turkish newspaper Sözcü, the investigation has been running for five years. Money from pilgrimages, offerings, the sale of religious books, and even funeral services was allegedly redirected to fund parties. Reports claim that at least four women were hired for an orgy... To cover up the expenses, they were reportedly listed under fake categories such as “residence permit fees,” “rent,” or “imam costs.” Inspectors who tried to look into the case were allegedly bribed with trips and leisure offers."

Netflix on X - "DANG!, a new adult animated series, premieres September 8. Starring Andrew Law, Poppy Liu, and Stephanie Hsu. Siblings Andrew and Eunice are living out their fun and messy dreams in New York City. Until their worst nightmare comes true: their high-achieving sister Ruthie wants to hang out..."
Kangmin Lee | 이강민 on X - "Asian-Americans are physically incapable of creating any piece of media that isn't about disappointing/hating their parents, being scared of eating ethnic food during lunchtime at school, or an Oxford study fantasy"
Melissa Chen on X - "Let me guess: they have strict parents who have high expectations. They grew up hating themselves for not being white. They went to Ivy schools. They rebel by getting tattoos and piercings and dyeing their hair blond. At least one of them is queer. How original! We got anime from Japan, K-drama and K-pop from Korea, and video games from China about myths, folklore, class struggle, culture and history. Yet Asian American media keeps recycling the same old boring tropes because of trauma or whatever. It’s pure ethnic narcissism."

Tattoos and piercings, what do they tell you about someone? - "Mental health relates negatively to having tattoos, especially large ones or many of them. This is consistent across many studies across time and place.
Intelligence relates negatively to having tattoos.
Having piercings out of the ordinary relates negatively to intelligence and mental health.
We replicate these findings using the OKCupid sample, which is a very large sample of mostly English speaking young to middle aged adults.
The more interesting sociological question is: if tattoos and piercings signal lower intelligence and worse mental health, how did they become so popular? Why do people get them? The most obvious reason might be that we are becoming dumber and more mentally ill as a civilization. There is some evidence concerning the first, and much regarding the latter. But the cohort changes are massive, so this can’t explain everything, at least not from the perspective of individual-level causation... I will forward a social media copy cat effect, where people copy various generally mentally ill people they see on social media. The population mistakenly uses them as a proxy for what is ‘more elite’ to do, even though statistics tell us that actually smart and mentally healthy people don’t generally modify their bodies so much in these ways. Social media and media in general cause issues with humans’ ancestral adaptation to copy the behaviors of those they perceive to be higher social status since it presents people with an abnormal sample of high social status (or apparent social status) people to copy from"
Women being more likely to have tattos tracks with how they are more prone to social contagion

Musa Kipngeno Rotich | Facebook - "This is an Attack on Allah’s Commands! Hijab is not what they call “human rights,” “women's right” nor is it “my dress, my choice.” It is Allah’s command. And statements like this from Amnesty International are an indirect attempt to convince Muslim women not to obey that command under the pretext of “free choice.” For believing women, this is a command and a matter of obedience to Allah s.w.t,. It does not matter approvals or disapprovals. This command does not change its source. For a Muslim, Allah’s command takes precedence over every other opinion. Concerning this Allah s.w.t. says: يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُل لِأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِن جَلَابِيبِهِنَّ ۚ ذَٰلِكَ أَدْنَىٰ أَن يُعْرَفْنَ فَلَا يُؤْذَيْنَ ۗ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ غَفُورًا رَّحِيمًا “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves [part] of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” —Surah Al-Ahzab 59 It is also clear that those responsible for them—such as parents, guardians, or husbands—bear responsibility in ensuring it is upheld among Muslim women. In Islam, responsibilities are assigned within the framework of care and accountability. A woman is under the care of her parents until marriage, after which responsibility transitions to her husband, and each will be held accountable for their role in that trust. This is being presented as a defense of Muslim women, while in reality it is an attack on the Islamic rulings. In which should remind us of Allah's words; وَلَنْ تَرْضَىٰ عَنكَ ٱلْيَهُودُ وَلَا ٱلنَّصَارَىٰ حَتَّىٰ تَتَّبِعَ مِلَّتَهُمْ “And never will the Jews nor the Christians be pleased with you until you follow their ways.” —Surah Al-Baqarah 120 It is time for the Ummah to recognize that a continuous challenge to Allah’s commands is taking place, and that the protection of the Deen requires what Rasool Allah ﷺ described as a shield in the Hadith: الإِمَامُ جُنَّةٌ يُقَاتَلُ مِنْ وَرَائِهِ وَيُتَّقَى بِهِ “The Imam is a shield; fighting is done behind him and protection is sought through him.” This is not merely a necessity, but a duty that becomes even more apparent when practicing the Deen faces increasing pressure. The Ummah needs #Khilafah today more than ever before, and we must exert all our efforts towards its establishment. #EstablishKhilafah"
Weird. Non Muslim left wingers who defend Islam tell us that the hijab is optional

World Cup referees given ‘sexual entertainment’ - "South Korea’s football association spent thousands of pounds on “sexual entertainment” for foreign referees, a report has revealed. The Korea Football Association (KFA) used corporate credit cards to pay for services at massage parlours at least eight times before or after games between March 2011 and March 2012, the report said. The services were allegedly bought for 10 referees and match commissioners officiating seven different matches, including three World Cup games and Olympic qualifiers."

Facebook - "Before Christian Bale became Batman, Christopher Nolan screen-tested several actors for Batman Begins, including Cillian Murphy and Eion Bailey. Since Nolan’s new Batsuit hadn’t been created yet, the actors performed their tests wearing Val Kilmer’s suit from Batman Forever. Bale ultimately landed the role, but Murphy’s audition still made a huge impression on Nolan. He didn’t think Murphy was right for Batman, but liked his performance enough to cast him as Jonathan Crane, better known as Scarecrow. Murphy would go on to appear in all three films of The Dark Knight trilogy."

The Rings Of Power Fans | Facebook - "Season 3 of The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power is setting up one of its most complicated character dynamics yet. At San Diego Comic-Con, the show’s producers confirmed that Galadriel, Sauron, and the newly introduced Celeborn will become entangled in what they described as a “bit of a love triangle.” But this doesn’t appear to be a conventional romance. Jamie Campbell Bower joins the series as Celeborn, Galadriel’s long-absent husband, returning after years of separation and war. His arrival naturally forces Galadriel to confront a part of her life that has been missing since the series began. At the same time, Sauron still hasn’t emotionally let go of her. Charlie Vickers has explained that Sauron remains in denial about Galadriel’s rejection and continues to view their psychological connection as something meaningful. That gives him another way to interfere, manipulate, and exploit the emotions surrounding Celeborn’s return. So the real triangle seems to be built on love, obsession, history, and psychological warfare rather than three people simply competing for one another. That could make the reunion between Galadriel and Celeborn far more complicated than fans expected. The Rings of Power Season 3 premieres on November 11, 2026."
Comments: "Before the tower of Barad-Dür, there was an Eiffel Tower"
"The One Ring wasn't meant to wear on your finger"
"🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦 So, how about Gandalf joining, then we have a love square. Oh, and how about Disa ordering from Subway without telling anyone and causing a big scene at a dinner because she won't lift her eyes from her phone?"
"When the blue hairs do tolken."
"Plot Twist: The good orc gets with Galadriel."
"Just like Tolkien always envisioned......"
"Plot twist : Celeborn and Sauron ended up being together and made a sex tape called "Teleporno""
"Galadriel didn't want a threesome, so Sauron became evil and swore to destroy everything. Just one threesome, Galadriel..."
"Will we see how Sauron was teased in high-school? I heard he was stood up at the Minas Morgul formal."
"One threesome to rule them all"
"Middle Earth: Dawson's Creek Edition."
"Good Lord, this is Tolkien, not Love Island."
"One threesome to bring them all and in the darkness bind them"
"When you let Autumn, Crystal and Lilith to "adapt" Tolkien!"
"Galadriel finally remember she's been married for 1000 years?"
"A Sauron-Celeborn love affair would’ve been more interesting 😒"
"I don't know, guys..I don't think Sauron or Celeborn are ready for any tempests."
"They'll also introduce a brand-new character: Antonio Juan García de la Vecchia. His first appearance will be unforgettable—riding in on a horse, wearing a traditional Spanish hat, with a rose in his mouth. And, of course, he'll become the fourth side of this "triangle." 🤣🤣"
"I’m just waiting for all the scholars twisting into a pretzel trying to prove that Tolkien indeed had that in mind, just like he envisioned diverse hobbits and multicultural Middle-Earth."
"Maybe they can adopt baby orc ? 😅"
"Great, so technically the whole third age is Sauron's tantrum era 😏 "

Vigilanteh | Facebook - "Just left Korea for Japan. Actually Korean food quite 1 dimensional except for when grilling meat and eating seafood because they are untouched by the abomination that is Korean cuisine. Yeah sure there are hundreds of banchan but it’s too simple in taste. There’s no depth of flavours. There’s not much thought or intellect that goes into a Korean dish. Simple is good sometimes like for the times when I am hungover but Korean food really isn’t it. What a fucking disappointment. Japan however is on another level especially with their broth. But that’s a story for another post."

New York Post on X - "Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s UK move is ‘huge slap in the face’ to William, creates ‘serious risks’ for monarchy"
Nile Gardiner on X - "Harry and Meghan are the two most destructive figures in the modern history of the British Monarchy."
Someone slammed him by talking about Charles II and William the Conqueror. No surprise Meghan supporters are ignorant of history. Of course they support Jason Arday also, because he was another black liar and grifter weaponising the establishment to go after critics

A More Accurate Measure of Calories Burned - "Though it might feel great to finish a workout and see “calories burned” pop up on your smartwatch, that number is often surprisingly inaccurate, with estimated error rates of 30-80%. The watch’s software makes its best guess based on variable factors like heart rate, wrist motion, height and weight, without actually measuring expended energy."

Why exercise doesn’t burn more calories — and why that’s not the point - "Evolutionary anthropologist Herman Pontzer, PhD, thought he knew what he’d find when he traveled to Tanzania to live among the Hadza, one of the last remaining hunter-gatherer communities on Earth. The Hadza walk miles each day across the dry savannah, hunting game and gathering roots, berries, and honey. Surely, Pontzer figured, they must burn more calories than sedentary Americans. He was wrong. After weeks of collecting urine samples and tracking physical activity, the results stunned him: the Hadza burned about the same number of calories per day as people in the United States who spend most of their time sitting. That finding — later confirmed in other hunter-gatherers and industrialized populations — upended conventional wisdom about exercise and energy use. It also launched Pontzer, a faculty member in the Duke Global Health Institute, into the center of a scientific rethink about metabolism, aging, and what it means to be human. Pontzer’s research suggests that the human body operates on a fixed energy budget. When we ramp up physical activity, the body compensates by dialing down energy spent elsewhere — on immune function, reproduction, even stress responses. That’s why exercise doesn’t translate into the calorie-burning bonanza many expect. But that doesn’t mean exercise is unimportant. In fact, those trade-offs may explain why exercise is so good for us. Regular movement lowers chronic inflammation, stabilizes hormones, and reduces risk for diseases from cancer to heart disease. “You have to think about diet and exercise as two different tools for two different jobs,” said Pontzer. “Diet is the tool for managing your weight. Exercise is the tool for everything else related to health — from mental health to cardiometabolic disease.”"

Meme - Admiral Snaccbar @Chris_Mench: "Serving shrimp with the tail still on when it's already mixed into something (pasta, rice, etc) is insane."
Populism Updates @PopulismUpdates: "Tell me your most radical position that cannot be placed on the left-right political spectrum"

The Travel Expert: Airport liquid rules were ‘security theatre’ all along - "Air travel liquid restrictions are little more than “theatre”, according to a renowned security expert. Bruce Schneier, a security technologist and fellow at Harvard University, told The Travel Expert podcast that curbs on flying with liquids in excess of 100ml, introduced exactly 20 years ago and still widespread, are “absurd”. “It’s 100 per cent security theatre,” he said. “They’re not doing it based on security, they are doing it based on a compromise, which would make no sense if it was a security problem. “If I walk through airport security with a gun and they find it… they ruin my day. If I walk through security with a bottle of liquid and they find it, they throw it in the trash and let me through. “Because there’s no penalty for failure, there’s no reason not to try multiple times. Here’s something so dangerous that you can’t take it on an aeroplane, yet so safe that [security officers] will throw it in a bin next to them.”... “The problems with these things is that they defend against the tactics that were used last time, and not the tactics that might be used next time,” Schneier said. “Did it ever stop anything? It’s an unanswerable question.”... Despite being unveiled as a temporary measure, the 100ml liquid rule remains the international standard across most airports. This is changing, however. In 2022, the UK government announced plans to scrap 100ml limits by instructing all airports to install new-generation CT scanners... Today, a handful of airports have scrapped 100ml rules, allowing passengers to carry liquids of up to two litres in their bags. In some instances, at great expense. Heathrow spent more than £1bn to reinforce its terminal floors and create space for the new, bigger scanners. Gatwick, Edinburgh, Belfast City, Belfast International, Bristol, Bournemouth and Birmingham are the airports that have eased the rules so far. Some European airports, including Milan Malpensa (terminal 1 only) and Rome Fiumicino, have also dropped the 100ml rules."

Links - 26th September 2026 (2 - General Wokeness [including Dolly Parton])

palmer on X - "More people have come out with stories about how Dolly Parton impacted their lives in 3 hours than Charlie Kirk did or ever will. Never pays to he hateful bigot!"
Left wingers are so hateful

Meme - Iconic Weird Guy: "This is so wild, I haven't seen a single person on the right say anything bad about Dolly Parton, only people on the left, interesting"
rosie @tayvseal: "the left really needs to pack up this performative bullshit before 2028 because who the fuck does this benefit?"
More Luigis Needed: "Did Dolly Parton ever say anything about Palestine or was that beyond her reach"
ISRAEL DID IT: "She couldn't see beyond her tits..... like most celebrities"
Of course, left wingers are pretending either that no one is bashing her because she was a good person or that MAGA are bashing her (I've seen more left than right wing criticism of her)

Meme - ultras for sana @sanareplyguy: "an evil, evil woman. that's all i have to say."
"Dolly Parton, Dead at 80, Spent Decades Supporting US Troops and Veterans"
"Dolly Parton's 'all-American heart': How country icon forged special bond with US military"

Meme - Mark Ashton @MarkAshton_7: "The left ladies and gentlemen! This about the sad passing of Dolly Parton who was one of the most generous, kind and happy people ever. They are nothing but unhinged, disrespectful, lowlife maggots."
GenericPerson @7Generic2: "Pretty sure she was a Trumper. Nothing of value was lost."
Weird. Many left wingers claimed that she was universally loved because she wasn't a piece of shit like Charlie Kirk. They couldn't even keep their hatred to themselves for even one day

Meme - night jar @nocturnalbottle: "it doesn't matter if dolly parton was a good person or if she donated $500 million of books for poor kids. She died with $600 million in assets, as a 35% stakeholder in a giant theme park that makes hundreds of millions per yr off the exploitation of the working class"

Meme - More Luigis Needed @LisaA311: "Did Dolly Parton ever say anything about Palestine or was that beyond her reach
I stopped having celebrity heroes a long time ago and it has never been a regret"
Ben Monroe @BenMonroe1: "I asked Al, seems she stayed away from speaking about genocides in general. Only exception is speaking out in favor of Ukraine's right to live. She was pro-LGBT rights and BLM. Also spoke about loving each other and treating people decently."
More Luigis Needed @LisaA311: "Why Ukraine and not Palestine"

Meme - kradd @suspiciouscrane: "Imagine being Palestinian and you log on twitter and everybody's mourning their hero who's biggest accomplishment is giving books to kids in a country that bombs you"
Readers added context they thought people might want to know: "Dolly Parton's Imagination Library operates in the US, Canada, UK, Australia and Republic of Ireland, not Israel."

Meme - Vocal Politics: "Behind the rhinestones, wigs and carefully cultivated image of kindness, Dolly Parton’s public record tells a more complicated story. It includes solidarity with US troops during the w-rs in Iraq and Afghanistan, a patriotic album released as the US invaded Iraq, and financial support for a campaign promoting the Israeli occupation and honoring its soldiers. Yet as Palestinians in G-za endured g-n-cide and d-struction, her public record offered no comparable solidarity. ￭ Meanwhile, questions have been raised about labor record behind Dollywood, where seasonal, low-paid service jobs replaced better-paid industrial work for many in the region, alongside longstanding criticism of Dixie Stampede’s sanitized portrayal of the US Civil War and sl-very. Charity may define part of Parton’s legacy, but it does not erase the politics, power structures and silences that accompanied it. #VPol"

Ranthony on X - "Took Dolly Partons passing for everyone to realize these are performative misanthrope dweebs and not revolutionaries who care about anyone"

Dolly Parton’s co-star Ricky Schroder sparks outrage over tribute - "Schroder shared a photo of himself with the late country music icon, writing in the caption: “I didnt agree with her advocating for Transgender & Covid Vaccine support…but Loved her anyway. Thank you for choosing me Dolly to be your Movie Daddy.”"
😉😘🎉 A on X - "So wait, the left can use Dolly to say the right is awful, but the right can't say she was great, even though we disagreed on some things?"

Peter Shrinks on X - "I read Rob Long's old piece on Dolly today, and it is worth reading: https:// commentary.org/articles/rob-long/the-beauty-parton/ I've been thinking about why her interviewers were so insistent on pinning her to their political positions. It comes down, I think, to tribalism. The left is tribal. The left ghosts people who are not in their tribe, even people who should be loved ones get the no-contact treatment if they aren't of the body, I mean, tribe. The left has to believe crazy things--cultish things--in order to remain in good standing with the tribe. The borders of those necessary beliefs keep shifting further away from rational thought every year. The left believes, as Krauthammer pointed out, that everyone else is evil. This goes beyond Krauthammer's famous: the right thinks the left are ignorant, the left thinks the right are evil. For the left, it is not enough to assign good things to their side (government is another word for things we do together, they are the empathetic and caring ones, they are anti-racist); they also have to assign every evil thing to anyone who disagrees. This is why everyone on the other side must, by definition, be racist fascists. I mean, come on, they're on the other side! So, when something like Sandy Hook happens, if you do not believe in the leftist solution of gun control, then you must not give a ---- that a lot of kids were killed: you are evil. (I had a friend on socials make this exact leap a day or two ago. If you are not in favor of their solution, you don't care that kids die.) If there are homeless everywhere and you don't believe that the solution is to spend $600,000 per person to house a few score of homeless, then you don't care about the homeless: you are evil. If you are critical of the current education system, then you must not want poor black and brown bodies (their nomenclature) to be educated: you are evil. If you don't believe in DEI preferences, you are evil. If you don't believe what the left believes, you must be a racist, sexist, National Socialist from Germany 1940: you are evil. So, getting back to the interviewers, they were trying to find out if Dolly was an acceptable person to like, if she were safely part of the tribe. If she turned out not to be, then they would have to hate her and ghost her. Remember, they are the good people."

N M P K on X - "Although she smartly insisted she was an entertainer and was not interested in making political statements, Dolly appeared to be a supporter of the President. She sent a televised birthday message to Trump in 1990 (long before his political career). She appeared onstage with 9 to 5 co-stars Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin, who referenced the film’s line about a “sexist, egotistical, lying, hypocritical bigot” in a way widely interpreted as aimed at Trump. Parton later said she did not want to be “dragged into” politics and was not surprised by her co-stars’ views, emphasizing that their opinions were not necessarily hers. The President's claim about the ballroom? Who knows?"
If you're not with the left, you're against them

Visiting Dolly Parton’s dinner show Dixie Stampede. - "Dolly Parton’s Dixie Stampede is the Lost Cause of the Confederacy meets Cirque du Soleil. It’s a lily-white kitsch extravaganza that play-acts the Civil War but never once mentions slavery. Instead, it romanticizes the old South, with generous portions of both corn on the cob and Southern belles festooned in Christmas lights."
Dolly Parton refuses to take a stance on many political issues. Should more people follow her lead? - "Parton's own sister, Stella Parton, has criticized Dolly for not calling herself a feminist and declining to speak out in support of the #MeToo movement. "I'm ashamed of my sister for keeping her mouth shut," Stella told the country music podcast Our Stories in February. "She can run it when it is about something else, but speak up about injustice, Dolly Parton. Speak up.""
Affairs? Drugs? You could ask Dolly Parton about anything and get a laugh. Just stay away from politics … | Dolly Parton | The Guardian - "Her apolitical stance seemed, to me, about protecting her career, her money. If you’re political, she said, “you’re gonna lose half your audience. I’ve got as many Democrats, as I do Republicans as fans, and I’m not going to insult any of them because I care about all of them.” It was the same reason she didn’t describe herself as a feminist, she said – she didn’t want to alienate men. I needled her (she remained good-humoured) because it seemed a cop-out – this was 2023, and life had become frightening and intolerable for many people. Tennessee, her home state, had not long banned abortion in almost all cases. At what point does silence, given her platform, start looking like complicity?"
This left winger claimed that random people on Twitter don't count. But even at least somewhat notable left wingers also criticised her

Trades Union Congress on X - "Reminder that Dolly Parton's 9 to 5 is a film about three women taking over an office and introducing free childcare, paid vacation, and flexible hours, resulting in a 20% increase in productivity."
Left wingers can't tell the difference between truth and fiction

Meme - Arty Trolls @ArtyTroll: "The left is LYING about Dolly Parton declining the Presidential Medal of Freedom"
"why did dolly parton decline the presidential medal of freedom twice?
Dolly Parton declined the Presidential Medal of Freedom twice during the Trump administration, according to her own account. She explained the reasons in a February 2021 interview on NBC's Today show. The first time, she said she could not accept because her husband, Carl Dean, was ill. The second time, the administration offered it again and she declined because she would not travel during the COVID-19 pandemic. Parton has long described herself as apolitical and said she avoids taking sides so she does not alienate fans. After the two Trump-era offers, the Biden administration also contacted her about the award. She said accepting it at that point would feel like "doing politics," adding that she does not work for awards and was not sure she even deserved the honor. She never received the medal from either administration. The story originates entirely from Parton's public comments; neither the Trump nor Biden White House issued a detailed public confirmation or contradiction of her account."

Thomas 🌸 on X - "Putting the left and right wing pipelines side by side is funny. You’ll have one person who radicalized bc their family couldn’t afford food and healthcare while the other radicalized bc the female warrior in their video game didn’t look like pornstar."
Thread by @memeticsisyphus on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "During the Ferguson riots, for a kid who attacked a police officer and tried to grab his gun, I was speaking with a white co-worker who lived in Ferguson. She was in tears recounting the mob moving past her families house talking about the flames they could see in fear they would have to escape somehow. As she was talking a black coworker came up looked her straight in the eyes and said “good.”
And let’s also not discount those “cringe” compilations. We called them cringe, we laughed at them, but they were endless examples of college students, professors, members of the media repeating insane conspiracies about how men, specifically white men, were evil. They denounced concepts like free speech and academic freedom, they perpetrated the rape hoaxes and the college campus scares. They’re the ones who say all men are rapists, all white people are racist, and it’s important to hire BIPOC and other marginalized communities (open discrimination). These people ruined lives and promised to do it again and again. Remember trigglypuff? She went viral for screaming at a conservative speaker to “keep your hate speech off our campus.” A horrible retrograde attitude to have as a university student, to denounce without giving a fair hearing. Well she moved on, she changed her name, she’s working on her PhD. She writes about fat phobia and prison abolition. Terrible ideas now being spread by the next generation of college professors. An entire power structure with open race and gender based contempt. You know, the thing you guys pretend to care about."

Meme - conny @BlvckJxsus: "gary indiana has been w/o power for 11 days. gary indiana is 76% Black. yet another example of environmental racism, its so fucking disgusting."
Readers added context: "The power outage was caused by severe storms on August 11, 2026, affecting Northwest Indiana and Northeast Illinois. Restoration in Gary was further delayed after utility crews were shot at on August 14, temporarily pausing work."
Clearly, white supremacists are travelling there to shoot work crews so black people will have no power for longer
Naturally, left wingers were blaming Trump

retard mode ✞ on X - "gary indiana not having power is an amazing story of diversity
>entire city council is black
>every electric company executive is black
>black residents can’t stop shooting at vehicles working to restore power
and they all blame racism for going without power for so long"
One cope to a truncated version of this tweet was that there was no proof, but in the full tweet there're photos of the city council and electric company executives

Threads - "Why do we have National Guard troops still wandering around DC and New Orleans when they can be in Gary, IN helping residents? Where is FEMA? The Federal Government is failing the American people."
Of course, if Trump sent in the National Guard without the Governor's request, they would be screeching about "fascism". Left wingers aren't serious people.

Tim Curry on X - "Ah the ‘is Rocky Horror problematic’ chat. Through a 2024 lens - of course it is. But babies, being gay was *illegal* in England 6 years before Rocky was first staged in ‘73. It was brave, bold & brilliant for its time. Look beyond the end of your own nose, just briefly. Please."

The secrecy surrounding Labour’s anti-Muslim hatred definition is chilling - "Who pressed “delete” on the evidence which led to the definition of “anti-Muslim hostility”? Billed as protecting Muslims from abuse while simultaneously respecting freedom of speech about religion, the credibility of Labour’s anti-Muslim hostility definition now lies in tatters. The definition was adopted in March after research by a five-strong Working Group on Anti-Muslim Hatred/Islamophobia Definition, appointed by Angela Rayner, and chaired by former Attorney General Dominic Grieve KC. It received evidence from interested parties between June 16 and July 20, 2025. That evidence will have been central to the working group’s deliberations and its ultimate recommendation to the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government. Who did they speak to and what did they say? That is now a question we cannot receive an answer to. Nick Timothy MP has been informed that all the submissions to the working group have been destroyed. This is deeply concerning. It opens the possibility that evidence from extremist groups may have influenced the deliberations. Material from organisations linked to divisive Islamist groups overseas, or evidence that was flawed or simply wrong, could also have played a role... For political systems to have credibility, transparency matters... The deletion of working material also appears to be against departmental policy... If Labour feared a definition of anti-Muslim hostility without specific reference to the term “Islamophobia” would provoke a backlash from Muslim groups, there is little sign of such a campaign. This suggests activists may be content to try and make do with the new tools they have been afforded. Indeed as a Policy Exchange report in January entitled “A False Compromise” argued, the vagueness of the term “hostility” may cause even more problems than an Islamophobia definition. There will also be a central figure to tie this work together. Although Canada abandoned its experiment with a Special Representative on Combatting Islamophobia, Labour intends to name an “Anti-Muslim Hostility Tsar” and has been advertising for support staff. Andy Burnham is yet to show his hand on many of these issues. However, his Government’s direction of travel appears broadly set, not least as it faces continued competition for Muslim votes from both the Greens and the Gaza Independents. What is particularly unsettling, though, is that when it comes to the definition of anti-Muslim hostility, we can all detect where this is headed. But no one can see how we have ended up where we have."

Protesters arrested for ‘f--- Islam’ sign in revival of blasphemy law row - "Free speech campaigners have accused police of reviving blasphemy laws after two protesters were arrested for holding signs reading “f--- Islam”. The Free Speech Union (FSU) and Big Brother Watch have united to back a test case involving two people who were arrested for holding the signs at a Unite the Kingdom march, organised by Tommy Robinson, the far-Right activist, on May 16 in London. They are being investigated for breaches of the Public Order Act 1986, with potential religious aggravation... Ms Carlo claimed that Britain was in the “grips of a free speech crisis” that was “draining police time and squandering taxpayers’ money”. A survey last weekend, published by The Telegraph, found that 51 per cent of Britons believed their rights to free speech had been eroded by Labour in the two years since the election."

Meme - "FIRST THEY REMOVED OUR STATUES, WHATS NEXT? OUR LAWS? OUR BORDERS? OUR FLAG?"
"YES! OBVIOUSLY! DID WE STUTTER? WE SAID DECOLONIZE!"

ripx4nutmeg on X - "A new BBC InDepth feature asks why Pride is not as popular as it once was, and concludes there are nine reasons why. None of them include the at least eight senior Pride officers - one who presented on BBC radio - who have recently been convicted of paedophilia offences."
Alison Golding on X - "It also fails to mention the openly displayed sexual activity and fetishism that in any other public context would be reason for the police to intervene."
ripx4nutmeg on X - "And no mention of the hundreds of pro Pride articles the BBC publishes each year, which don't seem to be working"

Mjמירי🇨🇦🇺🇸 on X - "Okay, so what is the purpose of this incessant race realist discourse? Of course there are population-level differences. Anyone who works with psychometric data knows that. The variance reflects some combination of genetics and environment. None of this is suppressed or hidden. We already know this. What’s wholly unproductive is making this a public discourse. Theres a reason you encounter almost no psychologists engaging with it in public. For those of us with an educational psych background, it’s especially disturbing because group averages tell you remarkably little about the abilities or potential of the person sitting in front of you, and encouraging young people to understand their intelligence through racial stereotypes can itself interfere with performance, confidence and learning. There’s literally no benefit to this discussion. So what exactly do people like Nathan want?"
Thread by @EPoe187 on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "The point is that if you have no explanation for the cause of racial disparities, people search for one. And progressives offer a toxic answer: pervasive racism. People become hostile to the West and rail against it. In other words, people become woke. Surely candor is better? Also, on questions of broad significance, we should default on honesty. That doesn't me we must be "honesty absolutists." But it does mean that if you are advocating silence, you better have some very strong arguments. To be clear, I do not think we should dunk on this or dismiss the question. It's a very reasonable question. The topic is divisive. But the alternative is not comity. It is progressives claiming the West is racist and thus creating racial hostility."

The Preprint Problem: Fringe, Genetically Informed Studies of Group Differences in Behavior Housed on Open Science Platforms
Emil Kirkegaard on X - "'People whose research I don't like are still posting it online. Since we have already barred them from the academic journals with explicit or implicit censorship, they have resorted to posting them on preprint servers. This is bad bad bad I tell ya! We need more censorship.' Truly the enemies of open science and free inquiry. They prefer closed science and unfree inquiry."
Crémieux on X - "The funniest thing about this paper:
- The author is writing in opposition to open science
- The author is someone who previously committed fraud and we only know it because of open science
lol"

Aly Feels on X - "I love my progressive friends, but it really is crazy how negative they are. They are like recreationally miserable. I really do think it’s socially desirable and encouraged in progressive culture and it’s not all just an organic response to hardship or mental illness"
Left wingers see mental illness as an important part of their identity, but sure, right wingers are just in denial about being crazy and everyone is crazy

Sign on the Dotted Line: How B.C.’s Latest Indigenous Outrage Threatens Freedom of Contract Across Canada

Sign on the Dotted Line: How B.C.’s Latest Indigenous Outrage Threatens Freedom of Contract Across Canada

"B.C. leads the country in court decisions and government policies that seek to achieve “reconciliation” by acceding to whatever radical demands are made by Indigenous groups. The key feature of this process – unending acquiescence via court rulings, legislation, policy and “nation-to-nation” agreements, many of them hashed out in secret and later sprung on a citizenry that had no say in the matter – has become like a modern form of Dane-geld. And with the same unfortunate result.

As King Ethelred discovered, whatever you pay is never enough. Rather, each “payment” of legal and/or public-policy tribute provokes still greater demands in the future while eroding Canada’s negotiating position the next time around. All of which is causing the slow-motion destruction of our economic and social wellbeing and the diminution of Canada’s national sovereignty.

The most damaging legislative example of this process has been the enshrining of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) into B.C. and federal law. But B.C. courts have wrought their own havoc with bizarre decisions that weaken key economic and legal precepts. They have tossed aside the key modern-day principle of state neutrality in religion by approving mandatory native spirituality ceremonies in public schools. Provincial judges have also ruled that the normal progress of civilization can be considered a treaty violation and that imaginary “supernatural dens” can be considered an objective reality sufficient to upend provincial laws. Even more significantly, the now-notorious 2025 Cowichan ruling revealed that fee-simple land ownership, the bedrock of Canadians’ property rights, can be pushed aside by aboriginal title on the strength of mere historical hearsay and second-hand notes.

As if all of this weren’t enough, now comes another cataclysmic threat to the coherence of Canada’s legal system: the case known as Metlakatla First Nation v. Prince Rupert Port Authority. Here the courts appear ready to erase another fundamental aspect of economic life in Canada – the sanctity of contract law. Though it concerned only a jurisdictional matter rather than settling the overall dispute, the January 2026 decision could prove to be Canada’s most dangerous Dane-geld yet.

The Metlakatla First Nation (MFN) is one of over 200 Indigenous communities in B.C. In 2021, it had a population of just 1,102 people living near the port city of Prince Rupert. Despite its tiny size, provincial and federal laws requiring a duty to “consult and accommodate” plus the ever-evolving concept of aboriginal title have given the Metlakatla a functional veto over resource development throughout their “traditional territory” that covers a vast swath – as much as 200,000 square km – of northern B.C.

The MFN exploits its hammerlock by demanding what amounts to Dane-geld from local resource projects. The tribute can take many forms: outright cash payments, job or contract guarantees, equity interests and other financial payments and/or benefits. For those who choose not to pay, the MFN makes frequent use of the courts and a cadre of expensive Vancouver lawyers who can delay or stymie any developer foolish enough to deny their clients their geld...

The record demonstrates that no resource project in the area can proceed without some form of payment to the MFN being made by taxpayers and/or industry. While some acknowledge or even celebrate this as supporting Indigenous reconciliation, what it really means is that the tribe – and effectively all of B.C.’s First Nations – exercise discretionary control over the Crown’s interests in the province. If a government needs to ask permission from another group to do anything on its lands, then it is not the sovereign master of its own house. It might not even own that house. The implications could hardly be more profound...

Bringing aboriginal law into the case, the MFN asserted that the PRPA’s duty, as an agent of the federal Crown, to consult and accommodate the MFN required it to reveal the terms of the REEF deal – even though this would have caused the PRPA to breach its contract with REEF. The MFN is basically saying that a duty to consult overrides any contractual obligations a Crown corporation may have with any other non-native organization or business...

The broad liberties that freedom of contract allows two or more parties to enter into mutually beneficial agreements have made it fundamental to the healthy functioning of our entire economic system – and, thus, a matter of paramount public interest.

The Crown’s duty to consult is a much more recent innovation, established via Supreme Court precedents that greatly expanded the meaning of the simple and clear wording of Section 35(1) of the Constitution. The duty to consult arises when a government has knowledge of the potential existence of an aboriginal right or title and is contemplating an action that might adversely affect it. This triggers a related doctrine, the “Honour of the Crown”, also manufactured by Canada’s courts, that requires accommodating a particular aboriginal right or title.

Indigenous rights proponents will argue that once aboriginal title is recognized or ceded, the Crown must vacate the jurisdictional space and allow native law to govern, giving the title-holder exclusive right to use and control the land. This has been argued in relation to the recent “Rising Tide” Haida Title Lands Agreement concerning B.C.’s former Queen Charlotte Islands. From this perspective, the new titleholder need not be bound by any agreements made by the previous occupiers – which quite likely could include legal contracts...

The MFN is essentially saying it intends to hold the entire port facility hostage until it gets what it wants. Contract law be damned...

In effect, the MFN is arguing, absurdly, it would seem, that any negotiation involving a Crown-owned entity and a potential native interest must always be resolved to the complete satisfaction of the native party, regardless of the legal consequences or temporal impossibilities...

Aboriginal rights “recognized and affirmed” by Section 35 of the Constitution are generally understood to be rights existing at the time of the first assertion of Crown sovereignty, which in B.C. is 1846. Obviously, nobody was then engaged in the handling of LPG, so no aboriginal rights have ever arisen in relation to it...

The MFN has essentially double-crossed both parties in favour of Trigon and its presumably better offer. And having put itself in such a conflict of interest, the MFN has also breached its Dane-geld agreements and should be required to give back all that lucre.

Despite such solid legal logic, however, it seems unlikely the Metlakatla will ever face any negative consequences for their actions. Given other recent B.C. court decisions that defy precedent and common sense, there’s a reasonable chance they’ll actually succeed in rewriting contract law. That is certainly implied by the recent court decision allowing the case to proceed to trial. And the “nuclear” threat to block all subsequent consultations with REEF for possible expansions and other changes could even have a good chance of paying off in terms of additional Dane-geld down the road.

But even if all this is successful in the short-term, what are the long-term consequences of this behaviour? By acting in such a discreditable manner, the MFN – and by extension all First Nations – are undermining their own claims to legitimacy. If one of the main goals of Indigenous reconciliation is to integrate and embed native interests into Canadian economic development, then native partners have a responsibility to act in a reliable and trustworthy manner. To this end, they should regard business contracts to be as sacred and inviolable as the treaties they once signed with the federal government...

The invention of new forms of aboriginal title meant to deliver a temporary business advantage to a particular First Nation raises even more uncertainty throughout the resource industry – and puts future projects in peril.

Keep in mind that the players in this dispute include large multi-national corporations with global perspectives. Undermining contract law for domestic resource projects will send another signal to the rest of the world that Canada is not a reliable place to do business. If Indigenous Canadians wish to participate in the broader Canadian economy, they need to accept the rules that have been in place for centuries and which all other participants have already agreed upon. They can’t simply make up their own game.

Correcting this situation – which has implications for all of Canada – will require the efforts of all Canadians. In my many years as a lawyer, I came to realize that my most successful business clients were those whose word was as good as a signed contract. Again, trust is fundamental to prosperity and progress. If native businessmen and businesswomen cannot be taken at their word then it falls to the business community-at-large to push back against this behaviour. The most immediate corrective is to sue over breach of contract, as mentioned earlier. This should be encouraged.

But the rest of society has a role to play as well. All citizens must be able to exercise their freedom to publicly and explicitly criticize discreditable activity, regardless of the race of those engaged in it. Unfortunately, the societal norms of present-day Canada make it nearly impossible to call out this sort of conduct in the native community, particularly by the mainstream media. The Globe and Mail’s coverage of the REEF dispute is illustrative of this reluctance.

In an article on the MFN’s February 4 declaration of its “nuclear” intent, Canada’s self-declared “national newspaper” studiously avoids any mention of the disastrous implications of the band’s actions, framing them instead as yet another example of an intransigent federal government doing harm to native interests. “Metlakatla,” the Globe blandly claims, “is upset that the port authority has frozen out the First Nation and other Trigon partners in their bid to diversify into different commodities, notably propane and butane.” Promoting such an upside-down narrative in order to avoid calling out the discreditable and self-interested behaviour of Indigenous interests – behaviour that, in this instance, threatens to wipe out a whole category of Canadian law – infantilizes the entire native business community.

Finally, it is also time for the Canadian court system to contemplate the effects of its own campaign of continued indulgence towards the escalating demands of Indigenous organizations. Allowing the MFN lawsuit to proceed despite another, superior arm of the same court system already implicitly upholding the legality of the confidentiality clause at the nexus of this entire dispute, reveals the disregard with which the B.C. judiciary has come to treat foundational aspects of Western society. We are witnessing in real-time the destruction of the various definitions, boundaries, protocols and standards that make up modern Canada. And it is being carried out with a shocking carelessness towards what lies at the heart of this process – racial favouritism...

Together with all the other outrages and absurdities foisted upon the country by the court system, this latest example of racial discrimination is turning Canada into an unpredictable, unstable and untrustworthy place to live, work and invest."

Left wingers will still call the Globe and Mail "centre-right".

Links - 26th September 2026 (1 - Donald Trump)

Meme - *Donald Trump at McDonalds* "This man went from fry cook at McDonalds to President of the United States! Who said the American dream is dead?"

Dr. Buzz Aldrin on X - "A half-Century ago, it was an honor to serve my country in the effort to put a human being on the Moon. I am proud of what we accomplished then and I have dedicated my life to the pursuit of an enduring human presence in space – it is a calling that runs through every fiber of my being.     Over time, I have seen our government’s approach to space wax and wane. But under the first Trump Administration, I was impressed to see how human space exploration was elevated as a policy of high importance again. Under President Trump’s first term, America saw a revitalized interest in Space, and his Administration reignited national efforts to get back to the Moon, and push on to Mars. The Trump Administration also reinstituted the National Space Council, and our Nation’s defense was enhanced with the creation of the U.S. Space Force – increasingly important as space becomes a contested domain. At the same time, I have been enthused and excited by the great advancements in the private sector space economy, led by visionaries like @elonmusk .  These are concrete accomplishments that align with my concerns and America’s policy priorities.       America is facing serious and difficult challenges both at home and abroad.  The Presidency requires clarity in judgement, decisiveness, and calm under pressure that few have a natural ability to manage, or the life experience to successfully undertake. It is a job where decisions are made that routinely involve American lives – some urgently but not without thought. The job requires sober analysis of frightening scenarios, and the instinct to lead with resolve. From the skies over Korea in air-to-air combat to navigating, landing, and walking on the Moon, I appreciate this kind of pressure. I know what it is like to have to make these kinds of decisions, with firmness and follow-through.   In this election, we have a choice and we all have one vote. For some, the choice may not be easy – but in times of uncertainty real leaders are most needed – to guide and inspire a people, to push through the noise, recognize what really matters, and accomplish missions critical to all citizens. Most Americans rightly consider it an honor to cast their vote for a leader they believe will best serve the nation. For me, for the future of our country, to meet enormous challenges, and for the proven policy accomplishments above, I believe we are best served by voting for @realDonaldTrump . I wholeheartedly endorse him for President of the United States. Godspeed President Trump, and God Bless the United States of America."
Weird how he didn't get the memo that Trump is evil

Report: Trump Bill Will Cause 175 Billion People To Lose Medicaid And Die | Babylon Bee

Meme - "The left when J6ers rot in jail for four years" *happy Pikachu*
"The left when J6ers get money because the government denied them a right to speedy trial" *upset Pikachu*
"The left when J6 precedents are used against them and Code Pink and Antifa get 20 years in prison without trial" *shocked Pikachu*

Democrats Criticize Trump For Holding MMA Match On The Hallowed Ground Where Biden Hosted Topless Trannies | Babylon Bee

Thread by @lamps_apple on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "E. Jean Carroll and the Judge in this case need to be sitting in a prison cell.  When Carroll first went public in 2019, she described laughing on the phone to Birnbach immediately after the encounter, recounting it as cheeky banter in a dressing room. Birnbach is the one who stopped her and said, “I think he raped you.” Carroll refused to go to the police.  Fast-forward to the lawsuit, and suddenly it’s a three-minute violent rape, Trump lunging, slamming her against the wall, pinning her, ripping down her tights. She fights him off and escapes.  The same woman who was giggling on the sidewalk about the “playful” meeting with the “real estate tycoon” now describes a brutal assault she barely survived.  E. Jean Carroll’s own account of when the alleged attack happened is a comedy of shifting dates that should have ended the case on day one:
- She first pinned it to the last few months of 1994 or 1995 (based on the wool dress and tights, no coat). Then she corrected herself: “I mean ‘95–’96.”
- At some point it was brought up that Birnbach, her main witness and the person she called within minutes of the attack, traveled to Mar-a-lago Feb. 1996 and wrote a glowing review on Trump.
- Then, citing her friend Lisa Birnbach, she insisted it must have been after February 1996, because Birnbach interviewed Trump at Mar-a-Lago for a glowing New York magazine piece in February 1996. Carroll’s logic: “Lisa never would have gone down there if she knew what Trump had done to me.”
- Then, when pressed on cross-examination to pick a date, she immediately walked it back: “I’m not sure… my best guess is spring of 1996… although it possibly could have been in the fall of 1995.”
So the attack was before February 1996, after February 1996, maybe 1994, definitely 1995-96, she wishes she could give a date but can’t, and heaven help her if she could. Got it. The absurdity is off the charts. If this is what passes for credible evidence in America, we don’t have a justice system anymore.
The jury awarded her $5,000,000.....  When Trump responded to the allegation and rightfully called Carroll a liar, she sued him for defamation. She claimed that readers no longer wanted to write to a woman the president had branded a liar and that her column had received 50 percent fewer letters from readers.  She had been posting anti-trump content on Facebook for 4 years leading up to this false claim... It is highly unlikely she had any Trump supporters "writing to her" to begin with.
Here is Trump... March of 1996 at the Academy Awards.  Somehow not one person on the street or in the store saw a billionaire celebrity walk in, get to the 6th floor, and attack Carroll. They didn’t see Carroll run out. Not one person saw Trump leave the store.  I mean this is absurd. I demand E. Jean Carroll get prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Throw her in jail."

Art on X - "The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision. That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there. Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level. Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline. The case proceeded anyway. The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence. Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict. An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.  Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case."

Apple Lamps on X - "The Carroll case rested on a sequence of legal maneuvers with no precedent in American civil litigation. Democratic legislators passed a retroactive temporary law eliminating the statute of limitations for decades-old accusations that could not be dated, located, or defended with alibis. The day the temporary law took effect, Carroll filed her pre-prepared lawsuit, the first in the state to do so.   A Democratic mega-donor secretly funded the plaintiff’s legal costs through a nonprofit. The arrangement stayed hidden until one of Trump’s lawyers discovered it. A Clinton-appointed judge then sealed all records so the jury never learned the billionaire backer had publicly committed to Trump’s political destruction. Every participant in the legislative, funding, and judicial steps operated inside the same political network, and each decision produced the same cumulative result.  The jury explicitly checked “no” on the verdict form’s specific rape question. The judge ruled rape proven anyway, claiming the jury had used a common rather than statutory definition… an impossibility, since their rejection under the common definition precludes rape by any standard. Trump’s team was barred from arguing innocence before a second jury, which awarded $83.3 million ($65 million punitive) on the rape finding the first jury had rejected.  A defendant was sued for defamation over denying an accusation, prevented from asserting that denial as a defense, tried before a judge who concealed the plaintiff’s political funding, and hit with a nine-figure verdict built on facts the jury itself refused to find.   No comparable sequence exists in recorded U.S. civil litigation history."

Meme - C3 @C_3C_3: "So let me get this straight... Reid Hoffman who was one of Jeffery Epstein's Island regulars funded the E Jean Carroll lawsuit with real no evidence against President Trump after New York changed laws to allow the lawsuit to proceed. That can't be right can it?"

C3 on X - "Reid Hoffman is a disgusting vile human. A real creep. He was behind both the Christine Blasey Ford sexual assault scam on Brett Kavanaugh and the E Jean Carroll sexual assault scam on President Trump. All while he himself was visiting Epstein’s Island, ranch and apartment."

Mike Bales 🫡🇺🇸 on X - "He’s the President of the United States — not your ex, not your personal villain, and not the cause of your misery. You don’t have to support him. That’s America.   But if someone is simply backing the sitting President and it makes you rage, cut people off, attack families, or act like garbage — you are the problem.   You’ve turned politics into a personality disorder: nonstop outrage and toddler meltdowns online. Grow up. He won. The sky didn’t fall. Pay your bills, care for your family, touch grass, and move on."

Leading Report on X - "BREAKING: Trump “collaborators” should have their heads shaved, put in orange pajamas, and then marched down Pennsylvania Avenue while the public spits on them, after Trump leaves office, says veteran Democrat strategist James Carville."
Auron MacIntyre on X - "Conservatives have not sufficiently internalized the fact that the Rubicon is behind them whether they like it or not. It doesn’t matter if Trump isn’t really a dictator, it doesn’t matter if you argued for restraint. If you ever lose again you will be jailed at best"
Damn Republicans refusing to give up power and abusing the law to persecute political opponents!
Time to condemn conservatives for dividing people. The left stands for unity, kindness and empathy!

Meme - "Liberal woman: "Why can't none of I you fuking aim across a grassy knoll in a back of a moving car!" "We were really Americans!" "Stop pulling the trigger unless you have the fucking SHOT!""
Clear proof Trump incites violence

Meme - "Never forget that Democrats held power for 12 out of the last 16 years... but they still blame Trump for every problem in the US and claim they can fix it. Make THAT make sense"

Meme - *Trump* *man having problems sleeping*
"LIVING IN YOUR HEAD IS NO LONGER RENT FREE. THERE WILL BE A 30% TARIFF ON THAT NOW"

‘Rape Melania’ sign at anti-Trump protest draws strong rebuke, sparking Twitter trend - The Washington Post
Clear proof that Donald Trump is a rapist

Andy Ngo on X - "Leftist publication The Intercept blamed Donald Trump and his supporters for multiple bomb threats on Jewish institutions in February 2017. It turned out the threats came from one of The Intercept's staff reporters, Juan Thompson. He was convicted and sentenced to 60 months in prison"

Grant Park cross burning incident person of interest speaks out - "It was a startling and offensive scene.  A burning cross in Grant Park last Tuesday - the century-old flaming symbol of racism and hatred.  For nearly a week, Chicago police and the FBI have been trying to identify the man who was suspected of setting up the cross and torching it.  NBC 5 Investigates has identified a 21-year-old college senior who said he is the person in the photo released by police and who described what he did and why...   University of Illinois Chicago senior Merlin Lu said he knew the implications of a burning cross and had placed a MAGA hat atop the cross, explaining his motivation was to protest Trump administration injustice - not something racist."
Hon. Vickie Paladino on X - "This kid belongs under the prison.  And you can be assured, that if this cross burning wasn't a false flag, and actually committed by someone on the right, the hate crimes unit would have that person under the jail right now, and we'd be getting endless lectures about the dangers of fascism.  But because it was done by a leftist who wants President Trump assassinated (pretty mainstream opinion for the left these days), the worst he's getting is a semi-unflattering interview by a local NBC affiliate."

Thomas Massie on X - "Feds placed the pipe bombs and fomented the demonstrations on January 6, 2021. One day this will be known as certainly as the fact that COVID was the result of U.S. funded lab research."
Are left wingers going to turn on him now for going against not one but two left wing shibboleths?

Is Trump Preparing a Military Coup? - International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine - "Bill Maher, the liberal host of Real Time, a talk show where he satirizes current events, a show with half a million viewers, said that the Trump government was getting Americans used to seeing a masked police force, people snatched off the streets, and troops in the streets of Washington, D.C., He described it as a “slow moving coup” and suggested that even if Democrats won the 2026 elections, they might not be able take office, comments widely reported in the national news media. The liberal journal Foreign Policy asked, “Is Trump executing a self-coup?” and provided evidence that indeed he appeared to be doing just that. Already back in February, The Guardian ran an editorial titled, “Donald Trump’s power grab: a coup veiled by chaos.”  Today evidence that Trump may try to carry out a military coup is piling up"
These are the same people who blamed him for not deploying the National Guard on Jan 6. Of course, if he had, they'd be accusing him of carrying out a coup too

Kangmin Lee | 이강민 on X - "Funny how the same people who melted down over Trump at MSG clogging NYC traffic are dead silent about Taylor Swift’s wedding causing the exact same disruption"

Disgraced Propagandist on X - "Do people know that Trump’s trade representative Jamieson Greer has opened up investigations into 60 countries that we accuse of using forced slave labor to make ultra cheap products impossible to compete with?  Basically, the Trump admin is the sole leadership on the global stage currently opposed to current modern slavery and doing anything about it. All the “liberal nations” of Europe etc just let it happen."

TheMastiffMafia on X - ""REALITY | Today I finally understood something about Donald Trump that I had been missing this entire time. And when it hit me — it hit me completely. Because look at who this man chose to surround himself with. Not billionaires.  Not people born into power. Not people who had everything handed to them.
 Karoline Leavitt — 27 years old. Ice cream shop girl from New Hampshire.   Trump looked at her and saw something the entire world missed.   Made her the youngest Press Secretary in American history.
Susie Wiles — a woman who has spent her whole life quietly strategizing from the background.   No fame. No spotlight. Just pure brilliance.   Trump looked at her and said — you will be my Chief of Staff. First female Chief of Staff in American history.
JD Vance — a soldier. A boy from Appalachia who served his country in uniform before he ever served it in office.   Trump looked at him and said — you will stand beside me.
 Pete Hegseth — a soldier who gave everything on the battlefield. Two Bronze Stars.   Trump looked at him and said — you will lead our military.
 Marco Rubio — the son of a bartender and a hotel maid. Two immigrants who came to America with nothing.   Trump looked at their son and made him the first Latino Secretary of State in American history.
My wife heard all of this tonight and said — do you understand what Trump actually did.   He did not build a powerful administration.  He built an unbreakable one.   Because every single person in it knows what it feels like to have nothing. And people who came from nothing never take anything for granted.  Tonight say one prayer for this entire administration. And say a bigger one for the man who chose them.    If Trump’s team just gave you goosebumps tonight — type “TRUMP DIDN’T JUST PICK A CABINET — HE PICKED WARRIORS” below.   Then pass this to every American who needed to understand why this administration hits different from every single one that came before it."
Via @JamesHu27192912  on X"
Another reason elites hate him so much

Brewery faces permit loss after Trump controversy - "A Wisconsin brewery whose owner once promised to give away free beer if President Donald Trump dies is set to lose its alcohol permit, state officials confirmed to USA TODAY on July 29.  Minocqua Brewing Company, owned by outspoken progressive activist Kirk Bangstad, will have its alcohol permit revoked Aug. 4, according to the state's Department of Revenue.  The action follows a June raid in which state officials seized canned beer from Bangstad's company, alleging it had been transported into Wisconsin from Illinois without the required permits and taxes, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, part of the USA TODAY Network... The permit revocation comes about three months after FBI agents interviewed Bangstad over a social media post that appeared to reference an alleged assassination attempt against Trump following the White House Correspondents' Dinner on April 25... In a Facebook post from the brewery's account, Bangstad wrote: "Well, we almost got #freebeerday. Either a brother or sister in the Resistance needs to work on their marksmanship or he faked another assassination to get a positive news cycle."... Bangstad and his attorney told agents they neither planned nor wished harm on Trump or Vance and did not support any groups advocating violence against them."
No surprise what TDS is linked to

Stacy is Right on X - "I'm old enough to remember when everybody was MAGA.  Bill Clinton 1993: "We have to end welfare as a way of life and make it a path to independence and dignity."  Barack Obama 2005: "We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected undocumented unchecked and go around our communities without our knowledge of them."  Hillary Clinton 2008: "If they've committed a crime deport them. No questions asked. They're gone."  Chuck Schumer 2009: "Illegal immigration is wrong plain and simple."  Joe Biden 2006: "I voted for a fence. I voted for 700 miles of fence."  Harry Reid 1993: "No sane country would grant citizenship to children of illegal immigrants."  Bernie Sanders 2015: "Open borders is a Koch brothers proposal that would make everybody in America poorer."  The Secure Fence Act of 2006 had yes votes from Obama, Hillary, Schumer and Biden.  Don't you dare allow them to gaslight you into thinking your values are racist and radical. These used to be mainstream Democrat positions.   They only changed their minds once their party decided to use illegals to steal power from the American people."

Jason D. Meister 🇺🇸 on X - "They arrested the President of the United States of America 4X, charged him 91X, indicted him 4X, spied on his campaign, sabotaged his first term, jailed his supporters, raided his private residence, censored him, gagged him, tried to bankrupt him, and attempted to remove him from state ballots.   When all of that failed they tried to assassinate him not once but four times.   And they go on national television to talk about how we need to vote for them to save democracy."

The Goal is a Fascist Continent - "On July 16, Marco Rubio and Stephen Miller’s long-planned conference on “The Resurgence of Political Terrorism” was convened in Washington, D.C. Delegates from over 60 countries were in attendance to hear the Trump administration preach about the gravest threat to “civilization” and to coordinate police and military in response. In the aftermath of the administration’s cuts of federal programs that monitor far-right violence, the conference was premised on the highly dubious claim that the vast majority of historical and contemporary violence emanates from “the far left.”... Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau’s remarks focused on the 1970s, with particular emphasis on the South American organizations Tupamaros and Montoneros, which he designated as terrorist groups... The former Homeland Security secretary, who just recently had overseen ICE’s “mass deportation” campaign in U.S. cities, declared a shared mission “to go after these narco-terrorists that are destroying our people.”"
Left wing logic: if you prevent left wing terrorists from killing people, and drug traffickers from working without restraint, you are promoting fascism. This is very telling. Left wingers want left wing terrorists to be free to murder anyone and for drugs to be readily available

Meme - Mike Solana: "serious question does the average democrat actually know that steve bannon went to prison?"
"NEWS ANALYSIS. In Going After His Foes, Trump Sets a Precedent That Could Haunt His Allies. President Trump' retribution campaign risks ushering in a cycle of retaliation in which each new administration takes aim at the last one."

Trump wins golf championship and mocks opponents: ‘I have talent, they don’t!’

Meme - Suzie rizzio @Suzierizzo1: "I'm a first grade teacher and my class is so much more intelligent than him it's crazy. <3" - 9/7/24
Suzie rizzio @Suzierizzo1: "I'm a nurse and I watched hundreds of MAGA die including a friend's mother who swore they were putting a chip in her arm. The majority regretted it in the end." - 8/15/25