Links - 19th October 2026 (1 - General Wokeness [including APA])

Diana S. Fleischman on X - "Candice Hargons is the incoming president of the American Psychological Association, the main professional organization of US psychologists. Here are some of her publications"

Benjamin Ryan on X - "These are the 10 most recent papers of the new APA president, Candice Hargons:
1. “That’s Probably What Euphoria Feels Like”: Nonbinary Black Womxn’s Gender Expression in an Antitrans (and Anti-Black [Womxn]) America American Psychologist, Sept. 2026 https://researchgate.net/publication/41 3684513_That's_Probably_What_Euphoria_Feels_Like_Nonbinary_Black_Womxn's_Gender_Expression_in_an_Antitrans_and_Anti-Black_Womxn_America
2. “Hard to Remember, then Hard to Forget”: A Qualitative Exploration into the Attitudes and Lived Experiences of Black People With Black Names Journal of Black Psychology, Oct. 2025 https://researchgate.net/publication/39 6909040_Hard_to_Remember_then_Hard_to_Forget_A_Qualitative_Exploration_into_the_Attitudes_and_Lived_Experiences_of_Black_People_With_Black_Names
3. A Content Analysis of Cultural Mistrust Among African Americans in Therapy Settings Journal of Black Psychology, Oct. 2025 https://researchgate.net/publication/39 6882965_A_Content_Analysis_of_Cultural_Mistrust_Among_African_Americans_in_Therapy_Settings
4. “People Already Don’t Know What the Fuck I’m Saying”: Nonbinary Black Womxn Perspectives on Sharing Their Gendered-Racial Identity Journal of Counseling Psychology, Oct. 2025 https://researchgate.net/publication/39 6831816_People_already_don't_know_what_the_fuck_i'm_saying_Nonbinary_Black_womxn_perspectives_on_sharing_their_gendered-racial_identity
5. “It’s an honor to be in this body”: A Black feminist grounded theory of embodiment through yoga among Black womxn Body Image, Oct. 2025 https://researchgate.net/publication/39 6564713_It's_an_honor_to_be_in_this_body_A_Black_feminist_grounded_theory_of_embodiment_through_yoga_among_Black_womxn
6. Brief Report: Naloxone Decline Among African American Kentuckians Substance Use & Addiction Journal, July 2025 https://researchgate.net/publication/39 3785046_Brief_Report_Naloxone_Decline_Among_African_American_Kentuckians
7. “Nobody Ever Sat Me Down to Talk About That Kind of Stuff”: A Thematic Analysis of Heterosexual Black Men’s Genital Hygiene Messages Health Communication, May 2025 https://researchgate.net/publication/39 1904305_Nobody_Ever_Sat_Me_Down_to_Talk_About_That_Kind_of_Stuff_A_Thematic_Analysis_of_Heterosexual_Black_Men's_Genital_Hygiene_Messages
8. “God Did for Me What I Couldn’t Do for Myself”: Understanding Religiosity, Spirituality, and Locus of Control Among Black Americans Who Use Opioids Journal of Religion and Health, Feb. 2025 https://researchgate.net/publication/38 8793550_God_Did_for_Me_What_I_Couldn't_Do_for_Myself_Understanding_Religiosity_Spirituality_and_Locus_of_Control_Among_Black_Americans_Who_Use_Opioids
9. Understanding Coping Strategies and Sociocultural Context in Black Americans’ Mental Health Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, Feb. 2025 https://researchgate.net/publication/38 8769360_Understanding_Coping_Strategies_and_Sociocultural_Context_in_Black_Americans'_Mental_Health
10. The Nonbinary God: Disaggregating Spirituality and Christian Religiosity Among Nonbinary Black Womxn (NBBW) Journal of Counseling Psychology, Jan. 2025 https://researchgate.net/publication/38"

J.D. Haltigan, PhD 🏒👨‍💻 on X - "Yes. "Asked by the APA how she defines scientific integrity, Ms. Hargons wrote that she "reject[s] the positivist paradigm's assertion of objectivity." Absolutely inane, delusional. Stupid individual."

Thread by @Tyler_A_Harper on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "Every time I write something critical of how elite academia is captured by bizarre ideologies, people claim that these are minor tendencies. Yet experts on things like the “liberatory potential of pilates for minoritized womxn” keep getting put in charge of major scholarly orgs. So you have this woman in charge of the American Psychological Association, Rouse over at the American Anthropological Association, etc. It’s just not tenable to claim this stuff is minor or a right wing fever dream when these people keep getting put in charge of major orgs."
Left wingers claim that if you deny climate change is the most important problem the world faces, you are a climate change denier and need to be ostracised and banished from polite society, then go on and proclaim that the idea of there being two sexes is wrong

Jamil Smith جميل كريم on X - ""This woman" is a widely recognized expert in her field. You can worry all you like about how intellectually dishonest people on the right view people like Carolyn Rouse—but questioning her qualifications based upon her opinions while undermining her expertise is a chump move."
Niko Nadeau on X - "The only people among whom she is widely recognized as an expert are people who also hold batshit false opinions, and who also did not believe in any sort of objective reality."
Brandon Warmke on X - "Rule 1 of captured disciplines: You're never actually supposed to assess the work. And they are never willing to defend it. Instead:
-Who are you to criticize this work--seriously who are you and who cares what you think?
-If you criticize the work, you undermine the author's expertise. They are experts and so shouldn't be criticized
-Qualifications settle the matter of quality, end of story.
-Since you're criticizing you must have bad motives. Stop being so mean.
These fields truly believe they should be immune from external criticism. They cannot handle it, they know that, and resort to a series of red herrings because they have no patience for addressing criticism. They publish research asking only that you celebrate it. These are very unhealthy academic norms. The refusal to accept external criticism is precisely why these fields have such low standards and devolved into identititarian obsession and progressive advocacy. What else is there to do?"
Left wingers think "qualifications" insulate you from criticism. And since they easily DEI each other "qualifications" too, that's supposed to make them immune to criticism
At least when Richard Dawkins was criticising the leprechology argument, it was in principle possible to learn about leprechology and challenge leprechologists on their own terms. But with the left, they just proclaim that experts who push the left wing agenda are infallible

Geoffrey Miller on X - "Why men -- especially conservative men -- won't go to therapy: The weird thing about the American Psychological Association (APA) is that every objective observer has known that it's been ideologically captured by the Left since the 1970s. That's the main reason why the Association for Psychological Science split off back in 1988, to form a more-scientific, less-politicized version of APA. Yet, here we are, 40 years later -- with APA still the main accrediting body that gives its seal of approval to PhD programs that train the vast majority of licensed clinical psychologists in America. APA sets the agenda. It determines what gets covered in graduate courses. It runs the most influential journals and conferences. It sets the whole political and ideological tone for psychological research. For decades, it has pushed political correctness, 'affirmative action', wokeness, DEI, and Leftist political causes. APA also ignores, censors, and/or demonizes the psychological research areas that are politically incorrect, but that replicate well (e.g. intelligence research, behavior genetics, evolutionary psychology, sex differences). There are alternatives. For example, the Psychological Clinical Science Accreditation System (PCSAS) focuses more on the real science -- evidence-based treatments and interventions -- rather than on the Leftist activism of APA. But, for the moment, the APA's ideological agenda still dominates American clinical psychology. This partly explains the feedback loop between clinical psychology becoming so feminized (with women getting about 80% of clinical psychology PhDs), and clinical psychology becoming so radical-Leftist in its politics. And it explains why it's pretty difficult to find licensed clinical psychologists who are actually sympathetic to men, conservatives, and/or Christians. This is one big reason why men won't go to therapy -- they don't want to deal with a (probably female, probably liberal) therapist who has been indoctrinated into wokeness for 5-6 years throughout her graduate training."

Steve McGuire on X - "BREAKING: An advisory panel on accreditation has recommended that the Department of Education suspend the American Psychological Association (APA) for 12 months amidst concerns about ideological standards on DEI, gender-related treatment, and especially antisemitism. After hearing from several groups during a meeting yesterday, the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity’s (NACIQI) voted to make the recommendation. The recommendation now goes to the Department of Education for a final decision."

Bernie on X - "This is an absolute DISGRACE of an article by the BBC! Any white woman who dares to paint her nails in a colour is framed as committing cultural appropriation… and if she has nude nails, or no colour the BBC prints the claim that this can perpetuate “white supremacist standards of beauty”. They actually printed that! So basically, no matter what I do to my NAILS I fail because I’m white? Why should I ever be forced to pay for an organisation that prints stuff like this?"

Meme - constans @constans: "I feel like some of these writers just finished a sociology degree and think they’re the first person to figure out that western social class norms code muted styles as higher class and loud, garish styles as lower class. Yes, congratulations on your discovery"
detty @0ddette: ""one 25-year-old tells the BBC, adding, "also, I lift weights in the gym, so I don't want to snap a nail and waste money." But there are those who think the trend - or the way it's being discussed by some - belies something more sinister.” Spend $120 on nails or you’re classist?!"

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo on X - "The Bank of England DELIBERATELY FIXED the fake "public vote" to remove ALL historical figures from bank notes & replace them with nature images. Freedom of Information requests by the Telegraph revealed the decision to remove historical figures was based on a "focus group" of a mere 119 people. The Bank LIED because it previously claimed the decision was based on a "public vote". In truth, however, even this vote was FIXED. Instead of having HISTORY v NATURE, the bank deliberately split the "history" category into 3 sections: historical events, historical figures, architecture & landmarks. That was the only way that "nature" could win. However, of course bank notes always combine at least two of those history categories. For example: Churchill & Parliament or Wellington & Waterloo. The Bank's actions are indefensible and questions should be asked in the House. The Bank of England has clearly been captured by progressive woke ideology. A visit to the Bank of England with its permanent exhibition on slavery makes that clear This is part of the wider war on British history. It's an attempt to create a NEW BRITAIN, based on ridiculous myths that "Diversity Built Britain" and that Britain has always been multicultural. Remember: the Bank of England issued a 50p coin (held aloft by Rishi Sunak) which was imprinted with the nonsensical statement: "Diversity Built Britain" Anyone who lived behind the Iron Curtain will find all of this eerily and scarily familiar. The pulling down of statues, the renaming of streets and schools, the rewriting of history, denigrating heroes, changing bank notes etc....these were all tactics of the communists. Severing the connection between a people and their history is the best way to demoralise a society and prepare them for the imposition of new myths."

LeeKuanYewRespecter on X - "Amber Schultz, an Age and Sydney Morning Herald reporter who has been covering the alleged dangers of social media believes the algorithm showed her manosphere-adjacent content presented by women to “soften her up” and test her receptiveness before serving her more extreme Andrew Tate content. That requires a conspiratorial theory of how social media works. Does she really believe these companies built vast, multi-billion-dollar engagement platforms to run teenage boys through an ideological induction funnel in service of Andrew Tate? Remember when they said this about Ben Shapiro and YouTube? The obvious answer is no, the algorithm is testing what keeps her watching. Even if you pause for a second. Engage with one type of content and it serves you more content popular with the same audience. It doesn’t need to “soften you up”, test your ideological readiness or guide you towards a predetermined endpoint. Tate gamed those algorithms with his content Ponzi scheme which flooded social media with clips, while saying politically incorrect things at the height of peak woke which obviously made him extremely effective engagement bait. How can you report on social media like this and not understand the basics of the attention economy?"

Meme - Owen Jones @owenjonesjourno: "There is nothing racist about any ethnic or religious group wanting their own homeland. The problem is if this desire is at the expense of another people. Zionism in practise meant "a homeland at the expense of Palestinians". It's really not hard to grasp this basic point!"
Prof Cosmic Feathers @BudgieSAGEE... @Prof CosmicF...: ""There is nothing racist about any ethnic or religious group wanting their own homeland." @Owen If that group that ethnic group was whites calling for their own homeland, you would call it racist. Why is it different if it Jewish people?"
Owen Jones @owenjonesjourno: ""The problem is if this desire is at the expense of another people.""
Prof Cosmic Feathers @BudgieSAGEE... @Prof CosmicF...: "So you wouldn't call those white nationalists who build whites only villages in back woods of the US Midwest racist?"
Owen Jones: "Clearly violates what I said"
Funny Logic @7thTimeCharmer: "So Whites have no right to an ethnic homeland unless we include everyone? You think it's a human right for the entire world to live with White people."
Keith Woods on X - "Great illustration of how leftists think about sovereignty. Every ethnic group is entitled to a homeland, but no White people anywhere can have as much as a neighbourhood to themselves because that violates the right of every non-White person on earth to have access to Whites."
Left wingers hate both white people and Jews, so this tracks

Don't Divide Us on X - "Below is a letter in The Spectator from September 4th, from Professor Alan Lester who tries to defend reparations. But his case is is based on two linked - unproven, possibly unprovable - assertions: (1) that slavery was the most economically transformative factor in British industrial success and that (2) slavery 'in the Atlantic' is the reason for present day social inequities. This ignores the real historical & social differences between America and Britain, and the fact that, in Britain, there are contemporary sources of social inequities that have nothing to do with historic slavery but much to do with important political, sociological and cultural shifts in the post-war period:"
Dr Colin Green ن on X - "1 is obviously false. No human labour, not even enslaved, matched steam engines for efficiency. Enslavement, for that very argument, is about efficient productivity in a specific landscape. Steam & coal had the more transformative efficient productive role in the broader economy."

Pro-Palestine photographer, friend killed by Muslim man in Tucson anti-LGBTQ hate crime - "A Muslim man shot and killed a pro-Palestinian photographer and his friend as they were leaving an Arizona gay bar before turning the gun on himself in what cops say was a hate crime. Ousman Ceesay unleashed the violence in Tucson around 12:30 a.m. Monday — targeting two men he did not know, Tucson Police confirmed. Cameron Davis Capara, 33, and Vincent Anthony Siqueiros, 42, were in the parking lot of Venture-N when they were confronted and then shot by Ceesay, according to cops... The gunman was carrying a note with a list of other gay-friendly businesses in the area, but cops said he never tried to enter the bar near where he committed the heinous crime. A second note in his home found by detectives “indicated he acted alone and that this shooting was a targeted attack motivated by hate toward the LGBTQIA+ community,” the department said. Ceesay, originally from The Gambia in West Africa, had no prior contacts with the police department and had only just moved to the area from Oklahoma City... He and his wife were facing money troubles after racking up more than $76,000 in debt that forced them to declare Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2018, according to the outlet. Ceesay previously worked as an Uber driver and was a practicing Muslim who prayed five times a day... Capara was a photographer who spent years documenting LGBTQ nightlife, campus demonstrations, rallies over Gaza and protests against ICE. “He cared deeply about people in Tucson or those thousands of miles away. People who were marginalized, overlooked, or misunderstood,” said his father, Jeff Capara. "
Damn Mossad!

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 on X - "Three days ago a gunman opened fire outside Venture-N, a Tucson gay bar. Two men dead. The shooter dead. Police now call it a targeted hate crime. He had a list of LGBTQ businesses on him. You probably even didn’t heard about it. Because the shooter wasn’t the approved villain. He WASN’T a white Christian nationalist. He was Ousman Ceesay, 44, a Muslim immigrant born in The Gambia. He confronted two men in the parking lot and started shooting. One of the victims was Cameron Davis Capara, a well-known local photographer and left- wing political activist who spent years documenting pro-Palestine marches, anti-ICE actions, anti-Trump, anti-fascism rallies, and anti-capitalist “No Kings” circles. The other was Vincent Anthony Siqueiros. Both were killed where they stood. Police didn’t rush out a mugshot package. Some coverage danced around the shooter’s background. National cameras never really showed up. No wall-to-wall specials. No Democratic officials lining up at podiums to denounce homophobia and demand action. The story dropped fast. That’s the tell. When the facts don’t fit the script, the outrage machine stays quiet. Two men get murdered outside a gay bar, the killer leaves a target list, and the same people who never miss a chance to lecture the country about hate suddenly have nothing to say. If that doesn’t show you how selective the media and the virtue-signal crowd really are, nothing will."
Micro2Macr0 on X - "No wonder this went under the rug. He was a Muslim killing the gays. That is VERY MUCH against the mainstream narrative. When will people wake up?"

The i Paper on X - ""Britain is turning on people who look like me, but white allies are silent" says Yasmin Alibhai-Brown. "We need our white allies to speak up otherwise, I dread to think what this country will become.""
Stand Up To Marxism on X - "Yasmin Alibhai-Brown Anti-White racist quotes:
1.) BBC World, 4th June 2006: Presenter Gavin Esler asked, “What’s wrong with white guys, by the way?” Yasmin Alibhai-Brown replied, “I don’t like them. I want them to be the lost species in a hundred years.”
2.) The Wright Stuff (Channel 5), 25th August 2008 In a discussion about employment/jobs: Yasmin Alibhai-Brown: “Don’t apply. It would be great if you went away, White, middle class men.” Host Richard Bacon replied: “Is that not a racist comment?” Alibhai-Brown: “Of course.”
3.) The Independent, 5th January 2009: “Spare me the tears over the white working class”
4.) The Independent, 30th August 2015: “I like Corbyn, but let’s face it, we don’t need another white man at the head of a political party”"
An "ally" is a useful idiot who no matter what he does will always still be despised for who he is

Jamie Sarkonak on X - "It has come to my attention that I have been denounced by @Advocates_Soc for criticizing judicial decisions — and yes, individual judges. Here's the thing. When someone, for example, spends her lawyerly career writing op-eds in favour of migration and calling herself an activist, and then becomes a federal judge, and from that seat allows all sorts of undesirables to remain in Canada on weak grounds, people are free to draw a connection from A to B. When a judge, for example, spends his lawyer years advocating fiercely for more race-based law, and then later throws out gun charges of black men on his (unsupported) assertion that police were racist during their arrests, people are free to question whether he's really a fair adjudicator. When a judge, for example, says that a ban on drug trafficking is unconstitutional, and then *applauds* vigilante drug dealers for their self-proclaimed safe supply program — applauds them for supporting the business of organized crime and feeding the addictions of street people — that's beyond the pale. You're worried about democracy being poisoned? Worry about the judge who threw out Parliament's law against selling heroin because she felt it was "common sense" that it was supported by science. I agree that it's not right to criticize a judge personally for impartially applying the law and coming to an unpopular decision (which they may even privately disagree with). But when their professional history, or their conduct in court, suggests allegiance to a cause that they happen to be ruling softly on, it will get noticed. Bringing the administration of justice into disrepute is a two-way street, you know."
Freedom of speech is for threatening Jews with death, not to critique the judiciary who are infallible

David Knight Legg on X - "A couple of Canada’s activist judges just got busted by journalist Jamie Sarkonak @sarkonakj for some particularly gross views of hard drugs and two-tiered racial views of defendants.
- B.C. judge Catherine Murray decided she would praise two hard-drug traffickers, and invent a Charter right to deal those drugs.
- Ontario judge Faizal Mirza thought the law should have a race-tiered application in sentencing Canadians, then deployed it.
Disgusting ideas. Thankfully not Canadian law. So when these activist judges tried to impose them, Jamie called them out. Great journalism. But then the “Advocates Society” wrote a letter to defend the judges. They made two points and both backfire: First, these judges “make their decisions on the facts and the law – not popular opinion or political expediency.” Second, journalists “vilifying judges who make unpopular opinions or demanding their removal is not accountability. It’s pressure.” Nice try. First, these activist judges didn’t apply facts or the law. They applied personal views not found in Canadian law. Second, calling them out and demanding their removal isn’t ’vilifying’, its asserting a democratic fact: activists don’t get to hi-jack the bench to impose drug dealing and two-tier race screens that Canadians haven’t consented to through legislation. If Catherine and Faizal wish their weird views were the law, they can resign and try to get a legislature to agree. That’s what politics is for. But thats not how jurisprudence work. Activists don’t get to hi-jack the bench for their personal ends just because they sit on it. The Advocates Society knows this. Great journalism by Jamie @sarkonakj defending Canada from activist judges whose bizarre ideas make everyone less safe and less equal before the law."

Jemele Hill on X - "America was built on the institution of slavery. It is how America became a world economic power — the buying and selling of people being tied to the economy. That is effectively white supremacy, since it was a race-based system. Fast forward to other economic policies that were guided by race — housing, employment, etc. There were rules that prevented Black people from equally participating in the free economy. In fact, one of the most glaring features of American capitalism is racial inequality. The racial wealth gap exists because specific policies were put in place to suppress economic participation. So yes, capitalism is tied to white supremacy."
Corey Walker 🇺🇸 on X - "It's amazing that a person can be so confidently incorrect like this and not feel any embarrassment. She will still be invited on cable news to share her "expertise." This is an absurdly idiotic take. If slavery made the US into an economic superpower, then why isn't the south richer than the north? America experienced its most robust economic growth after the abolition of slavery. Industrialization, manufacturing, railroads, technological innovation, migration from Europe, and free labor markets accelerated the US to the top of the global economic hierarchy. Slavery arguably stunted the economic growth of the south due to underinvestment in human capital, weaker incentives to invest in education and public infrastructure. Slavery was not only a moral atrocity it was also a terrible economic system which only served to enrich the small wealthy slave-owning class."

Muslim Brotherhood has its sights set on Canada | National Post - "I attended a closed-door meeting with foreign intelligence officials to discuss the growing influence in Canada of the Muslim Brotherhood, the powerful transnational Islamist movement that is the ideological root of all modern Islamic terrorism. The Brotherhood’s objective, I was told, is two-fold: to achieve a paralyzing effect on the ability of Canadian policymakers to act against it; and to steadily expand its influence in Canada. Indeed, the Gaza war has mobilized and emboldened the Islamist group’s “white-collar jihadists” in the country to advance its strategy of “civilizational jihad” — gradual institutional transformation, rather than violent overthrow. The officials also revealed that their analysis of internal Hamas documents — the Palestinian offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood — showed that the terrorist group views Canada as vital to its plans. “They love you guys,” one of them quipped. Last year, a Global News investigation revealed that roughly 450 individuals with various roles inside Hamas have ties to Canada. In another private briefing in Washington, D.C., a senior U.S. national security official made it clear that the Americans are also acutely aware of Canada’s growing Muslim Brotherhood problem. The message was unambiguous: the United States government views the Muslim Brotherhood as a transnational threat, and it is deeply concerned that Canada’s immigration policies are severely undermining broader North American counter-terrorism priorities (a recent C.D. Howe Institute report, which found that 24,599 asylum claimants were accepted by Canada without being asked a single question between January 2019 and February 2023, was cited)... Across Europe, governments are increasingly recognizing the Brotherhood as a serious political and security challenge. France released a government report describing the group as a “threat to the nation,” with lawmakers urging the European Union to classify the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. Dutch legislators have called for a ban on the group. Sweden has launched an investigation into alleged Islamist infiltration, while Belgian officials are raising alarms about the alleged Brotherhood-linked capture of some municipalities. Like Europe, the U.S. sees Canada as both a terror target and an incubator of terrorist threats. It considers it unacceptable that its northern neighbour serves as a logistical, financial and recruitment hub for Islamist groups. However, Canada, unlike Europe, appears determined to avoid the conversation altogether, despite CSIS warning in its latest public report that the threat is “particularly concerning.” This disconnect was on full display when Prime Minister Mark Carney, in his much-awaited speech on combating antisemitism, invoked “Islamophobia” while failing to acknowledge the principal driver of the anti-Jewish hatred across Canada: Islamist extremism. That reluctance is becoming harder to justify. Recent reporting on the annual convention of the Muslim Association of Canada (MAC), an organization that openly praises the Muslim Brotherhood’s philosophy, raises troubling questions. According to Melanie Bennet of Juno News, a youth workshop at the convention displayed the phrase “Jew free” in a word cloud under the prompt: “What kind of community/Ummah/world do you want to help build?” At another session, an audience member reportedly asked how young Muslims could enter politics to “infiltrate the western wolves.” During the same session, Anas Altikriti, an alleged Muslim Brotherhood associate who was effectively denied entry into Canada but attended virtually, seemingly rejected the very idea of Muslim integration into western society, describing it as “a tool to beat the Muslim community with,” and insisting that Muslims only need to “abide by the law.” Despite the controversy surrounding the event, there has been effectively no political condemnation from Ottawa. That silence matters because MAC benefits from taxpayer-supported charitable status and, according to Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) records, received over $38 million in public funding between 2020 and 2024. Canadians are entitled to ask whether organizations that annually platform Islamist ideologues — including individuals denied entry into the country — and promote deeply divisive rhetoric should continue receiving taxpayer funds. The question becomes even more pressing when contrasted with the CRA’s decision to revoke the charitable status of eight Jewish non-profits over the past three years. The double standard is hard to ignore... The problem in Canada is not simply political Islam itself. It is the persistent unwillingness of political leaders, media institutions and public officials to discuss the issue honestly. Fear of accusations of racism or Islamophobia has created a climate in which legitimate national security concerns are too often dismissed before they can even be debated. A healthy democratic society cannot afford political taboos around questions of extremism, foreign ideological influence or institutional infiltration. Canadians deserve transparency about Islamist networks operating in the country, including their sources of funding, political relationships and their degree of influence within public institutions. The Carney government has a responsibility to confront this threat with decisiveness rather than denial. The longer Canada avoids acknowledging the dangers posed by the Muslim Brotherhood, the more entrenched its networks become — and the harder the consequences will be to reverse."
To fight Islamophobia and spite the US, Canada needs to welcome the Muslim Brotherhood and become a Muslim country