Wilfred Reilly on X - "Western prey morality is invoked by China, the various Arabs, Russia, India and Nigeria, etc ONLY in the context of exploiting useful idiots. Can anyone truly be mad enough to believe that these legendary historical rivals and ruthless current peers actually just care about "minority representation inside the USA," or "queer environmental justice," or wotever?"
Frank Adams on X - ""Can anyone truly be mad enough to believe that these legendary historical rivals and ruthless current peers actually just care about "minority representation inside the USA," or "queer environmental justice," or wotever?" The lefty kooks pretend to believe it to effect their goals."
TheBlaze on X - "Democrat Rep. Rashida Tlaib: “The political structures that we are surrounded by were built on slavery and genocide and oppression. Look at this room, motherf******. We aren’t going anywhere. Now we’re in Congress and every corner of the United States.”"
Justine Bateman on X - "These people are ridiculous. They have lost all tethers to a sense of self. Their entire identity now relies on this treasonous hate of America. They make up fantasies of how horrible America never was to justify their need to "fight tyranny." They have no identity but this. And they cling to it with a death grip, because they have nothing else. None of it is true. Not the fantasy about America about which she is shrieking, not her identity of believing herself to be some "hero" in a movie about an oppressive government, and not the resulting congress-free, senate-free, President-free, childish (and completely chaotic) future she sees for this country. She is an infant. She and others like her will not get their way. Not even close. If you have a modicum of common sense, it's time to let your line in the sand about tolerance be made known. Myself, I have a limit to tolerance. I have a limit to patience. I know there is a limit to free speech. If your plan is to tear down the United States of America, if your plan is treason, I will not tolerate you, I will have zero patience for you, and I will not defend your right to free speech. @FBI @FBIDirectorKash"
We're still told that left wingers don't hate their countries
Facebook - "Suicidal empathy strikes again.
These far-left activists spent their lives championing open borders, defund the police, racial justice, Antifa causes, injection safe sites, and every progressive policy imaginable.
• Benjamin X Rowe: LGBTQ+ activist and far-left punk rock concert organizer. Randomly shot and killed by a Black male while walking down the street.
• Ryan Carsen: Injection safe site activist and self-described Antifa. Randomly stabbed to death by a Black male.
• Josh Kruger: LGBTQ+/HIV+/injection safe site/racial justice activist. Killed by a Black male during a home invasion.
• Ted Lawson: Democratic Party County Secretary, BLM activist, voter rights activist. Randomly murdered by a 15-year-old Black male.
Rest in Peace to all of them. No one deserves to be murdered, regardless of their politics. But their ideology left them vulnerable to the very realities they refused to acknowledge. They championed the groups and policies that ultimately took their lives.
This is what suicidal empathy looks like. Ignoring patterns doesn’t make them disappear. Prioritising everyone else over your own safety has consequences. The left keeps learning this lesson the hard way. #conservative #fyp #Crime #rip #lgbt"
Covfefe Anon on X - "It's bad to give attention to stupid liars like David French but his attempt to meme the phrase "magic blood" is a great demonstration of the cargo-cult thinking on the left that leads to a "search for a thought-terminating cliche" "Magic dirt" rhetorically wounds them because it exposes the stupidity of the trick they're trying to play - that by simply declaring people "American" that you meaningfully change those people. This wound causes them to search for a counter-cliche to dismiss it "Magic blood" is his attempt at this but it plainly fails because every person alive has an instinctive understanding of the importance of heredity - their encapsulated, bounded thinking that merely tries to stay in tune with the progressive egregore - that thinks of nothing other than "how do I conform to the beliefs of a 'Good Person'" has a lot of trouble with this idea because it has to reconcile Children are like parents in appearance and temperament and capability Somehow this stops being true when you are dealing with groups I guess they square this by... pretending there are no group differences? Which is actually absurd and something literally no one believes and no one has ever believed - not even leftists like this guy but it serves as a patch - a way of avoiding thinking about the extremely obvious implications of other things he believes Leftism constantly requires absurd levels of mental handicapping like this - inserting absurd falsehoods to avoid thinking about the consequences of other falsehoods - those falsehoods are then abandoned in other contexts which demonstrate that they don't actually "believe" them - to the extent that they can be said to believe *anything* outside of "I am a Good Person for having Correct Beliefs""
Stand Up To Marxism on X - "Across the West "progressive" governments, are following the exact same playbook.
1. Flood the country with immigrants from the Global South.
2. Indoctrinate children through education to criticize or hate their own country and heritage.
3. Erase or downplay the nation's traditional history and heritage, replacing it with a multicultural narrative.
4. Implement draconian speech restrictions, hate speech laws, and content moderation.
5. Promote gender ideology, self-ID policies, and youth medical transitions in schools and institutions.
6. Push aggressive climate policies, net-zero targets, and green regulations (often raising energy costs).
7. Reform criminal justice toward leniency, reduced policing, and focus on systemic explanations for crime.
8. Impose DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) mandates across government, education, and corporations.
9. Expand welfare programs, redistribution, and identity-based social benefits.
10. Favor supranational governance (EU-style integration, global pacts) over national sovereignty.
11. Undermine or de-emphasize traditional family structures, religion, and national identity.
12. Support expansive abortion/reproductive rights and related social policies framed as equity.
13. Destroy all sense of national identity and demographic cohesion.
Why? Progressive ideology is derived from Critical Social Justice, critical theory (Neo-Marxism) and postmodernism that views Western civilization, traditional institutions (family, nation, religion, merit), and historical majorities as sources of oppression requiring complete deconstruction and equity-based remedies. Universal human rights and diversity are elevated above particular national or cultural continuity."
X-Men Were Never Created As A Civil Rights Allegory Confirms Marvel Writer - "The most repeated piece of X-Men lore ever told is a myth, and it just got debunked by one of the men who built the franchise. John Byrne, the legendary artist behind the Dark Phoenix Saga and Days of Future Past, sat down with The New York Times this week to promote his new alternate-reality hardcover X-Men: Elsewhen. Along the way, he casually detonated the origin story fans have been repeating for fifty years: that Stan Lee created the X-Men as a metaphor for the civil rights movement, with Professor X as Martin Luther King Jr. and Magneto as Malcolm X. According to Byrne, that framing came later, and Stan simply went along with it. Byrne tells the Times that anyone who actually reads the earliest issues will see a very different template. “Xavier is F.D.R. and Magneto is Hitler,” he says, pointing out that early Magneto is even draped in Nazi trappings. Per Byrne, fans persuaded Stan Lee that he had been writing a racism allegory all along, and Stan’s response was essentially “Sure, why not?” That should sound familiar. It is the same pattern that produced every “the X-Men were always political” argument you have seen online for the past decade. The mutant metaphor did not start as a statement about race, and it did not start as a statement about LGBTQ identity either. It started as a superhero book about outsiders, and readers poured their own meaning into it. It’s not something limited to a small segment of the population; it’s something that all fans can relate to. That’s the point. Byrne even cites the late Marvel writer and editor Roger Stern on the real appeal: the fans saw themselves in the X-Men because the X-Men were outsiders who only hung out with their own kind. So the claim that the book was activist by design from issue #1 is fan mythology that certain types of fans found convenient to ratify... Byrne’s answer is the one nobody arguing online wants to hear: it meant whatever the readers decided it meant, and Stan Lee was happy to take the credit."
Marvel's X-Men Movie Writer Confirms It: The X-Men Are For Everybody - "Lee Sung Jin — the Beef creator reuniting with his Beef director Jake Schreier, who helms the mutant reboot after Thunderbolts* — tells Deadline that he and co-writer Joanna Calo (The Bear) are starting from the one thing every version of the franchise that ever worked started from. “We’re thinking about these characters and what makes them tick,” Lee said. “What parts of them feel universally relatable, and leading with that first before we start thinking about plots and world stakes and all that.” Universally relatable. Leading with that first... Notice what “feeling othered” means in that framing. It’s not a demographic checkbox. It’s the most universal feeling there is, that every kid who ever ate lunch alone, every adult who ever walked into a room and felt like the odd one out. That’s why the theme is “relevant today in 2026”: because it’s relevant to everybody, in any year... This isn’t theory. Marvel just ran the experiment on its own animated series. X-Men ’97 Season 2 stripped out the Season 1 agenda messaging — the latest sign of Marvel’s retreat from its message-first era — and told a universal story instead. The results: a 100% on Rotten Tomatoes, a 10/10 three-episode premiere, and a 10/10 Apocalypse episode that plays like a gut punch instead of a lecture. Critics themselves called it less preachy. For everybody. Character first. Watch what happens."
Meme - "According to the Southern Poverty Law Center
The Nation of Islam a black supremacist hate group has 50,000 members
Which is More than...
The KKK, The Aryan Brotherhood and the Patriot Front COMBINED"
Naturally, left wingers were pretending this was false
Meme - Retard Finder @lfindRetards: "Incredible stuff here after the terror attack in Paris earlier. One short paragraph separates the confessed motive from "The motive for the attack remains unknown.""
""It is Allah who commanded me," the man lying on the floor says. Nunez said the man had been detained by an off- duty police officer. pay tribute to him, it was a courageous act," he added. The motive for the attack remains unknown, Nunez said, adding that police could not verify the identity of the attacker, whose declarations were "incoherent" while he was being arrested."
I don’t want police writing ‘racism essays’, I want them catching criminals - "you’re stuck in a boardroom listening to an audio recording of a fairytale. “The Witches of Glum” is nominally about a beautiful witch called Gwendolyn and an ugly witch called Groga, but it’s also a trick, used to expose officers on police diversity, equality and inclusion (DEI) training programmes as the prejudiced human beings that they must surely be. (Spoiler alert: the beautiful witch is in fact evil, while the “disfigured” witch is good. Clever, eh?) And you can all too easily picture the glee if and when you “fail” any part of the subsequent questionnaire. Because the DEI brigade needs you to come across as bigoted and biased in order to feel good about themselves. If only this were the most ludicrous aspect of the DEI courses being imposed upon officers across England and Wales, courses that are costing taxpayers hundreds of thousands of pounds and taking them away from their duties. But documents obtained by The Telegraph through a freedom of information request prove otherwise. Over at Surrey Police, for example, it turns out that officers have been told to write 500-word “reflections” on how they feel about the force’s stance on racism. While you’re at it, why not get them to copy out “I must not be racist” a hundred times on lined paper? Then there are the officers at Northamptonshire Police, who are being taught that Brexit is behind a rise in far-Right hate, and those at City of London Police who are planning to host a “listening circle” about Gaza. While the DEI dons are in their cosy little circle, passing around a plate of Digestives and enjoying their moral superiority, ethnic minorities are being abused and attacked by far-Right extremists. Little old ladies are being mugged at knifepoint, and hard-working shopkeepers like my local newsagent are being raided by shoplifters almost daily. They’re unfazed by the new CCTV system he paid an arm and a leg for, he tells me, knowing the police don’t have the time or the resources to follow up on footage – what with that three-day conference on pronouns to attend and the weekly LGBTQ binaural beats sessions. There is no place for racism, sexism or indeed any form of discrimination in policing, and it’s right that officers should be held to the highest standards of fairness and professionalism, but being made to write or chant the right words will never change a racist’s attitudes or behaviour (it’s possible it may even reinforce it). Meanwhile, branding a non-racist one of the most disgusting words in the English language isn’t just offensive – to borrow one of their favourite terms – but unacceptable."
Basil the Great on X - "WOW. A student at the Oxford Union tells Tommy Robinson he is lucky they've put security on for him otherwise their Pro-Islam supporters outside would beat him to death This is the Oxford Union, how far it has fallen as an institution when this is the sort of argument made"
Ben Shapiro on X - ""You're lucky we Muslims in here are nice, because if we weren't, our co-religionists outside would burn you to death" isn't an amazing argument"
Je Suis Non-binary: Coming Out in Support of Free Speech - "Charlie Hebdo... Now I was in an office surrounded by some of the most left-wing people you can imagine, all of us committed to ideas I had supported for years. Seeing them so unconcerned about free speech and the murder of fellow journalists, I felt rage and sadness — and on top of that, I felt so alone... though my devotion to activist movements remained a constant, my life was moving away from academia. I had taken up a profession that also concerned itself with power and language — but always in pursuit of truth, backed up with data and based on more than one source. Ironically, my journalistic work was more rigorous than my academic work ever had been... Authoritarian demagogues generally don’t like their policies to be questioned or ridiculed. Journalists are murdered all over the world for exposing abuses of power, and satirists who joke about the wrong people or ideologies disappear behind bars or appear on hit lists. Truth and questioning are the first things to go in a repressive society, even when they are delivered in a way that makes people laugh. An uncensored press and a culture of satire are great indicators of the level of rights and freedoms that people have within a society. I had always believed these things were at the core of left-wing beliefs. They promote accountability for the powers that be, expose corruption and wrongdoing, and give a voice to the powerless. It turned out I was wrong. That Wednesday in the winter of 2015, when those 12 editors died, it seemed everyone around me saw something entirely different than I did. I scrolled through my social media feeds with a sinking heart. In post after post, my left-wing activist friends were using their ideas about power and language to the maximum, calling out anything that reeked of Islamophobia in the responses to the attack and stifling the debate around it into a black-and-white issue. It was completely well-intentioned, but completely off the mark. Only one satirist dared make a statement about it, a short, biting video that still feels relevant today. He was branded a racist — not that he cared, but he was one of the very few who took that risk. In a sea of right-wing xenophobia, protests in the Muslim world, and social justice activists more concerned with Islamophobia than protecting the freedom of the press, I ached for solidly nuanced left-wing critiques. But there weren’t any. It was clear to me that the free speech I wholeheartedly believed in — so much so that it had gotten me into several professional conflicts — now belonged to the opposite side of the political divide from the theories that had helped me finally understand my gender. And maybe it always had. At that point, I recognized that social justice is, at its very core, unequipped to support a free press... Let me say something here that probably won’t make me many friends: I believe that it should be the left, not the right, which stands in support of showing the Muhammed cartoons. For the good of all of us. Freedom of speech is fundamental to the success of a diverse society and essential for the freedom of everyone in it, including Muslim people. You cannot build a better world by employing the same repressive tactics used by the fundamentalist regimes you say you want to abolish... the left has now seemingly instituted a hands-off policy when it comes to defending free press and satire. Nobody dares even to make a joke about anything remotely related to the issue anymore, and anybody who wears a “Je Suis Charlie” t-shirt is now supposedly a right-wing asshole... Women who work to end marital captivity or stop female genital mutilation are being silenced because of their supposed “Islamophobia”, and advocates are refusing to discuss anti-LGBT sentiments in non-Western countries unless it’s to place the blame solely on the shoulders of the West. And yet another desperate situation is unfolding now that will haunt us into the future. I shudder to think how the radical left can impact our stance toward the unlucky, liberal-minded people of Afghanistan, now trapped under Taliban rule after the US and its NATO allies have gone. My heart breaks when I think of Afghan women and LGBT people being abandoned by progressive movements afraid to come to their aid for fear of being labeled “colonialist.” Will we look back on this in a couple of decades and find ourselves on the right side of history with this kind of reasoning? I just can’t imagine that. I think the left is making a massive mistake here. One I cannot support anymore... I asked them about the “Je Suis Charlie” demonstrations that were planned for that evening. Would they go? No, they said, they didn’t want to “play into the hands of right-wing people.” I felt my throat close up with disappointment. I hadn’t expected to be so alone with my grief. I decided to go anyway, even if I was alone. But I hid my face from any photographers because it was best not to be seen there. Not many things make you feel lonelier than the fear I had that evening. It felt like going back into the closet. I don’t ever want to feel like that again, and I want others to know they aren’t alone either. I have come to realize that this is bigger than journalism, bigger than being non-binary"
From 2022. Left wingers don't want to abolish fundamentalist regimes. They just want to abolish Christianity
Christina Aguayo News | Facebook - "BLM and the Democrats were in favor of Body cams, until it proved that the vast majority of complaints lodged by BLM, Dems and anti-Police agitators were false...
🔹A trial in Rialto, California, found an 88% reduction in citizen complaints against officers wearing cameras, alongside a 59% drop in use-of-force incidents.
🔹In Phoenix, Arizona, complaints against cops wearing body cams dropped by 23%, while those against officers not wearing cameras rose by 10.6%.
🔹A multi-site study involving nearly 2,000 body cam wearing officers reported a 93% drop in complaints, attributing it to behavioral changes by 'suspects' that de-escalated volatile situations.
🔹In Las Vegas, body cameras led to fewer use-of-force reports and citizen complaints, with no significant change in arrest rates.
🔹A comprehensive review of 30 studies confirmed a 16.6% average drop in complaints
The drop in complaints undercut the democrats and BLM who accused police officers of brutality without any evidence. The 'he said-she said' narrative was ditched for video evidence that overwhelmingly favored police officers."
Kamala Harris settles in Point Dume, a nearly all-White community - "Despite a career-long commitment to combating racial disparities in housing and touting the importance of living among Black people, former Vice President Kamala Harris’ new California mansion is situated in a neighborhood with virtually no racial diversity. Harris’ new 4,000-square-foot property, which reports indicate she acquired for $8.15 million, is located in the exclusive seaside community of Point Dume and includes ocean views, multiple wine fridges, private golf greens and enough parking to accommodate five vehicles. Point Dume is situated entirely within Census tract 8004.08, which the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey estimated was just 0.2% Black and roughly 94% White as of 2019. Harris' choice of neighborhood may surprise longtime observers given past comments she has made about the importance of living among other Black Americans."
Andy Ngo on X - "A black author who got a $2 million plus crime novel book deal has been accused by his own book agent of suspected AI-use to write the story. He says this is racism and an attempt to stop black authors from shining."
Author Whose $2 Million Book Deal Was Derailed by AI Concerns Says He’s Innocent - WSJ - "“Definitely innocent!!!” Jerry Falade, a graduate student at Southern Methodist University, said in an Instagram story early Tuesday. “They CAN’T and WON’T stop this Black boy’s light from shining!!” he wrote in another. Fourteen publishers had bid on the U.S. rights for Falade’s crime novel, “Call Me, I’ll Hide the Body,” and he ultimately signed a two-book deal with Macmillan’s Minotaur Books imprint worth more than $2 million. HarperCollins Publishers landed the U.K. rights. Soon after the deals closed, Falade’s agent at Europa Content notified the publishers in a letter that he could no longer support the book after concerns were raised about the author’s possible AI use... Falade said none of the editors he met with during the book-sale process asked about AI usage. He also said he hadn’t consented to having his manuscript run through AI detection software and found it “very suspicious” that much of the coverage of his situation has focused on the growing capabilities of that software. He said he has retained legal counsel... Falade said the claims against him are part of a historical pattern of diminishing the intellectual contributions of people of color. He wrote that in the past such authors were accused of plagiarism, while now “If you’re a Person of Color and you secure a lucrative deal in history, someone, somewhere, will accuse you of using AI.” Meanwhile, he wrote, white authors “brag about using AI all the time.”"
Trevor Phillips: ‘London liberals are only now realising how hated they are in Britain’ - "As chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, Phillips helped to shape the Equality Act 2010, which included protections from discrimination for people undergoing gender reassignment. He says he failed to anticipate the strength of the trans movement in subsequent years. “It never occurred to us for one second that anybody would think of sex as anything other than biologically determined,” he says. “It was an oversight on our part that you would get the rise of a movement based in fantasy. We never imagined that there would be people peddling the fantasy that you can just make up what sex you are. And it never occurred to me that people who make decisions on these things would be engulfed by this fantasy. “The problem is that the grown-ups in the room have turned into cowards, and they are all running away from the fantasists,” he adds. “When I was a student, one of the things we fought for was that women could operate independently of men. Now, according to this new fantasy world, the one thing women cannot do is decide when they want to be separate from men. It’s not just outrageous, it’s insane.” He also disagrees with politicians making their race or sex the most important thing about them, singling out Rachel Reeves for repeatedly talking about being the first female chancellor, and his “good friend” David Lammy for drawing attention to the fact that he was the first black deputy prime minister. “When they [highlight their race or sex], the rest of the country is going, ‘What is wrong with you?’” he says. “It’s not just that you are drawing attention to these things, it’s that you are saying, ‘If you don’t think this is the most important thing about Rachel Reeves or David Lammy, you are a sexist and a bigot and a racist.’ There is a lot of work to do for the governing classes to reconnect with the country, and for that we need a bit of humility.”"
