Links - 15th May 2026 (1 - Migrants: Europe)

Visegrád 24 on X - "🇪🇸 A young Spanish woman will be euthanized today, after a group of illegal migrants gang-raped her while she was in state care.  In 2022, the teenager Noelia Castillo Ramos placed in a state institution amid family difficulties and placed in a state-run home together with North African migrant minors where she was raped by them.   The trauma broke her.   Months later, Noelia attempted suicide by jumping from the 5th floor. She survived, but the fall left her paraplegic.  The rapists were never arrested and remain free.  Instead of delivering justice or adequate long-term support, the authorities offered assisted suicide as the solution. Today, March 26, 2026, Noelia Castillo Ramos will be euthanized.   The system that failed to protect her is now "solving the problem" by ending her life"

BBC News (World) on X - "Spanish woman to die by euthanasia after long legal battle with father"
Bonchie on X - "The Moroccan migrant gang that sexually assaulted her is described as “some men in a night club” in this article. And they try to frame the father as bad for…not wanting his daughter to die. There are not limits to what the press will do to protect their narratives."

Meme - Kangmin Lee: ">girl gets gang raped by migrants
>spanish gov: ok girl we'll kill you
Wtf is going on in the world."
Roberto Vaquero @RobertoVaquero_: "Noelia Castillo Ramos will be the first person to receive euthanasia for depression in Spain. The cause? No one will tell you. In 2022, Noelia suffered a multiple rape in a supervised care center. This completely shattered her life, leading to a failed suicide attempt that left"

Bad Hombre on X - "In 2000, there were 400,000 Muslims in Spain, 1% of the population.  That number is now 2.6 million, 5% of the population.  Now sex with animals that “doesn’t result in a vet visit” is decriminalized.  There are no-go zones in every major city.  Public spaces used for Catholic Semana Santa processions are now used for Eid.  And the latest: victims of Muslim rape gangs are being euthanized by the state, while the rapists go free.  Replacement isn’t a theory. It’s a reality."

Neil O'Brien on X - "Some people argue for a "one off" amnesty for illegal immigrants in Britain. Spain is doing it's *ninth* "one off" amnesty. The right answer is to deport all illegal immigrants."

Peter St Onge, Ph.D. on X - "After mass amnestying 500,000 third world illegals, Spain demands Brussels redistribute them to the rest of Europe 🤡"

Alex Recouso on X - "Malta is not allowed to run a citizenship by investment program because Eurocrats in Brussels think it’s a “security risk.” But they’re okay with Spain giving away hundreds of thousands of passports to illegal immigrants. The entire EU project doesn’t make any sense. I predict freedom of mobility within member states will end soon."
Angel Investor Guy on X - "what? the EU makes perfect sense. if you're a European, it hates you"
Alex Recouso on X - "If you're European, it hates you. If you're wealthy, it also hates you. If you're a wealthy European, you better leave."

Meme - John Rain @johnthenoticer: "Net financial contribution by origin of immigrants in the Netherlands:  Western and European immigrants make a positive contribution to public finances, while non-European immigrants represent a significant net fiscal COST.  The same result is found in every European country where this statistic is calculated."
Descending order of fiscal impact: "Other outside Europe. Native Dutch reference. European Union. First generation Western. *0 and all following are negative*. Indonesia. Latin America (excl. Suriname, Antilles). First generation total. Other Europe. Suriname. Asia (excluding Indonesia and Japan). First generation non-Western. Aruba and (former) Netherlands Antilles. Africa (excl. Morocco). Turkey Morocco.
Figure 4.4 Net contribution of first-generation immigrants by immigration background and of native Dutch reference (hypothetical immigrant with the characteristics of the average native Dutch person). Source: our own calculation based on Statistics Netherlands StatLine and Statistics Netherlands microdata."
Clearly the data needs to be censored so it can't be used "irresponsibly"

Visegrád 24 on X - "The EU opens the Erasmus Program to North Africa and the Middle East in a "Pact for the Mediterranean" worth 42 billion euros to facilitate visa issuance, particularly for students from Morocco, Tunisia, and Egypt"
András LÁSZLÓ MEP 🇭🇺 on X - "As political blackmail against PM Orban, the EU has banned Hungarian students from the Erasmus program. Yet, its going to spend 42 billion on North African students. We have a very corrupt European Commission which puts non-citizens first."
From 2025

Zineb Riboua on X - "A Syrian artist living in Berlin posted a video now trending across Germany.  Germany welcomed Syrian refugees during and after the civil war and have no colonial past in Syria to atone for. What do they get in return?  Resentment, a Third-Worldist rant basically about Western colonizers as eternal oppressors.  The contrast with Syria itself is what makes this interesting. Syrians inside Syria today want the West. They want a peaceful Damascus, a functioning banking system, trade, integration into the global economy. The loudest anticolonial voices and movements now sit in Western capitals advocating for things their own people aren’t aligned with."
Weird. We were told that endless waves of refugees was the price the West had to pay for supporting wars that destabilised the Global South, yet Germany consistently opposed military intervention against the Assad regime. We were also told that the way to end Islamist terrorism was to import even more Muslim migrants to show how much Europe loved Muslims. Clearly, importing tons of people who will always hate and resent you even as they consume disproportionate amounts of social welfare is the way to ensure Europe prospers in the 21st century

Meme - "Immigrant groups who rape the most are also the ones we pay the most to live in our countries."
"Net Cost and Rape Conviction Rate. *positive correlation*
Data: Danish Ministry of Finance, Statistics Denmark"

Bill Maher lays bare Sweden’s refugee problem | The Spectator - "Comedian Bill Maher is often a fascinating person to watch. His show, Real Time with Bill Maher, airs Friday nights on HBO and features monologues and a panel of guests who discuss the week’s news stories. What is interesting about the program is that Maher is a sort of “anti-woke” liberal — the weed-smoking, pro-choice, left-libertarian kind — that despises political correctness. This makes for entertaining viewing because Maher alternates between spitting out hideous ideas, hilarious jokes that cut both sides of the political aisle and occasionally stumbling upon — and being willing to vocalize! — an important but perhaps inconvenient truth.   When watching Real Time, I often find myself vacillating between wanting to throw the remote at the screen and nodding in agreement.   Last week’s episode was a perfect example. Maher admitted that he thinks abortion is “kind of murder” but is still pro-choice because he believes the world is overpopulated. Essentially, unborn children need to die to retain planetary homeostasis. It’s a pretty evil position to justify murder on environmental grounds. But how many other pro-choice people feel the way Maher does and are just unwilling to express it? It might actually be useful for people to air their vilest inclinations so they can be combatted appropriately; isn’t that one of the key reasons to support a culture of free speech?   Another nice thing about free speech is that when someone feels comfortable enough to share views that their peers might find reprehensible, they may eventually stumble upon the truth. This was the case with another opinion Maher expressed during Friday’s show: that unfettered immigration to Sweden essentially destroyed the country. Even more generally: not all cultures are created equal.   “Sweden opened its borders to over a million and a half immigrants since 2010 and now 20 percent of their citizens are foreign-born and its education system is tanking and it has Europe’s highest rate of gang-land killings,” Maher said.  “Liberals say, ‘blaming immigrants for the rising crime rate is racist.’ Yeah, but is it true?” he continued as his audience sat in uncomfortable silence. “Of course it’s true. It’s not a coincidence the quality of life went down when the Somali gangs… started a turf war.”   Sweden is indeed a case study of what happens when political leaders don’t consider the cultural effects of immigration. There are of course economic and political impacts of mass migration, but people are often afraid to talk about culture for fear of being branded racist. If you value your country’s laws and norms, you are reasonable to be concerned about what happens when you import millions of people who operate on a different set of standards. As the former president said, “They’re not sending their best… some, I assume are good people.” Sometimes genuinely good, honest, hard-working people seek to migrate so they can afford themselves a better opportunity in life. Sometimes they are seeking refuge from personal or political violence. But when you treat immigration as a right as opposed to a privilege, you inevitably end up taking in some pretty bad people, too.   In addition to settling tens of thousands of asylum seekers each year — many of whom the Swedish government now admits don’t have legitimate claims — Sweden took in 163,000 refugees, most from Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan during the 2015 refugee crisis, more than any other nation in the European Union. According to economist Tino Sanandaji, this has had devastating effects on the overall health of the country: “Foreign-born represent 53 percent of individuals with long prison sentences, 58 percent of the unemployed, and receive 65 percent of social welfare expenditures; 77 percent of Sweden’s child poverty is present in households with a foreign background, while 90 percent of suspects in public shootings have immigrant backgrounds.” Unmentioned by Sanandaji or Maher is the ongoing rape crisis. Rapes in Sweden fell slightly in 2015 but increased every other year between 2013 and 2021. Between 2013 and 2018, nearly 60 percent of rapes were found to have been committed by men born abroad.   In the United States, where we currently face a border security crisis of unprecedented proportions, we see similar effects. Venezuelan and El Salvadoran gangs are setting up criminal enterprises in American cities, young women have been randomly raped and killed by illegal aliens — and in the aftermath of Biden’s withdrawal from Afghanistan, some of the refugees we took were immediately accused of committing domestic abuse or sexual violence against their fellow refugees.  Luckily we face nowhere near the problem Sweden has — yet. But I would urge people to take a look at the violence against women and child sexual abuse rates in Mexico and ask themselves if they want carte blanche importation to the US... the crime rate for Central and South American immigrants was drastically higher than those of Chinese and European immigrants, which illustrates the point that it’s not just immigrants that are the problem, but immigrants from some places that have different cultural norms...   This, though, is clear: a country that’s not careful about who it lets in could end up like Sweden. Maher is no conservative hero, but on this point he is correct."

Mircea Nedelea | Facebook - "“Sweden was once known for its beautiful landscape and safety. It used to be a country with beautiful people and a strong economic; a global leader in innovation and in the tech industry with a highly skilled workforce. All this changed due to mass immigration. Now Sweden has become the bomb and rape capital of Europe. The country’s safety ranking has significantly declined, from being consistently in the top three for many years to 15th place in 2024.”"
The source got suspended

Almost half of young Muslims in Germany hold Islamist attitudes, study finds - "Almost one in two, or 45.1 percent, of Muslims in Germany under the age of 40 hold Islamist attitudes, according to Germany’s Radicalization Monitoring System and Transfer Platform. MOTRA is run by the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA).  MOTRA researchers revealed last month that almost half of younger Muslims in Germany hold latent or manifest Islamist-leaning views, which means they feel drawn to Islamism, prefer Sharia law over the constitution, and hold antisemitic prejudices.  Breaking this down, the researchers found manifest Islamist attitudes – meaning their radicalization toward Islamism is already evident and pronounced – to be most widespread among Muslims under 40, at 11.5%. MOTRA found 33.6% to have latent Islamist views, where the inclination toward Islamism exists, but the radicalization is not yet openly visible. These combine to make 45.1%. On Friday, German Parliamentary State Secretary Christoph de Vries (CDU) told Die Zeit newspaper that his party is “very concerned about this.” De Vries also cited a separate worrying figure: Antisemitism is four times as widespread among young Muslims as in the population as a whole. Asked what had driven the rise in Islamist views, de Vries said that Islamist influencers, present in social networks and gaming platforms, have caused a surge in such views. He also said the Hamas terrorist attack on Israel’s Gaza border communities on October 7, 2023, was a “driver for Islamism as a whole.” De Vries suggested that a social media ban for young people may be the way forward, given Germany has been seeing “13- and 14-year-old boys and girls become radicalized on social media to the point where they wanted to commit serious attacks.” He also said there was a need to look more closely at what happens in mosques, especially those controlled by foreign governments.  De Vries was referring to Germany’s main mosque association, the Turkish-Islamic Union for Religious Affairs (DITIB), which is subordinate to Diyanet, the Turkish Presidency of Religious Affairs, and is also financially dependent on it.  DITIB has around 1,000 mosques in Germany, and is sometimes called “the long arm of Erdogan.” “In Turkey, and thus indirectly also through DITIB in Germany, we see a mixture with currents of the Muslim Brotherhood and the partly antisemitic Milli Görüş, another Islamist movement. We also notice how antiSemitic the leaders of the religious authority Diyanet in Turkey are. The mood stirred up there is also reflected in Germany,” De Vries said.  All of this has an impact on Jewish life in Germany, he lamented.  “In many parts of the city, they can no longer go out with Jewish symbols such as the kippah,” he said. He added that antisemitism affects almost every major West German city.  He stressed the need for a transition in Germany's immigration policies. “For those who remain here, the fight against antisemitism must always play a role, whether in integration courses or in the naturalization process,” he explained, adding, “Anyone who lives in Germany must recognize Israel’s right to exist.”"
Time to jail the "far right" and ban the AfD to Protect Democracy
Social media also radicalises adults, so it's time to ban social media for everyone so the government can control the narrative

PeterSweden on X - "HUGE NEWS The Dutch parliament passes law for the "strictest asylum policy ever". Asylum seekers will no longer be allowed to get permanent residency status. It will also become punishable by law for NGOs to help people come into the country illegally."
Sphynx Knight 🇳🇱 on X - "As a Dutch person who is happy with this outcome, this doesn't mean a single thing. As European laws are above National laws, we will never see the end of this madness as long we're still part of the European Union. It's time to leave the European Union. 💯"

Why is France pushing for its women to be segregated? - "Valérie Pécresse, the leader of the Paris regional council, is opposed to the idea of single sex carriages, saying; “I refuse to accept that there is apartheid in public transport in our country. Because that is what it is: separating women from men is tantamount to apartheid.” This sexual apartheid is well underway. As long ago as 2003, some public swimming pools in France were running female-only sessions because of religious sensitivities. In 2016 two female Muslim journalists secretly filmed themselves being refused entrance to a café in the Paris suburbs on account of their sex. There was outrage from politicians but subsequent reports demonstrated that this was not an isolated case. The truth is France has not been resolute in defending its values. Whether through fear, laziness or arrogance, it believed that Muslims would embrace the secularism enshrined in the Republic. A study published this week confirmed the troubling re-Islamification of French Muslims. In 2003, for example, only 16 per cent of females under the age of 25 wore a headscarf, a figure that today is 45 per cent. Of that same generation. 47 per cent refuse to kiss a member of the opposite sex on both cheeks as is the French custom. This is just one strand of the sexual segregation taking hold of France’s Muslims. The survey reported that 45 per cent of men and 57 per cent of women under 35 practise some form of segregation, such as the refusal to shake hands, to receive medical treatment from a person of the opposite sex, or to visit a mixed-gender swimming pool. Overall, 57 per cent of French Muslims under 25 believe more in Islamic laws than Republican laws... In 2009 the Telegraph reported on the growing number of swimming pools in Britain where the sexes were either separated or, as in the case with Croydon council, obliged to conform to a strict dress code, such as: “Male costumes must cover the body from the navel to the knee and females must be covered from the neck to the ankles and wrists”. Recently Swim England – the sport’s governing body – boasted that its ladies-only swimming programme is “making a real difference to the lives of Asian Muslim women”. In 2023 the Prince and Princess of Wales visited a Muslim Centre in west London. When the Princess extended her hand to one Community Leader he declined to take it. Instead he pressed his hand to his heart and bowed his head. That may be his custom but it is not the British custom. Some newspapers described it as an “awkward” moment. No, it was insulting. To the Princess, to women and to Great Britain. France and Britain must be far more robust in defending their values, and that entails defending their women and girls – from physical and ideological attack. Sexual equality and not sexual apartheid."
Time to blame white men for the sexual assault

Roman Helmet Guy on X - "The European Migrant Crisis began in 2001 when the USA began its wars in the Middle East as part of the Global War of Terror. Oh wait. No it fucking didn’t. Migration actually decreased during that period. It began in 2015 when European leaders suddenly welcomed them all in."
We keep being told that migration is a force of nature that cannot be stopped. Yet it's only Western countries that are unable to stop it

Dr. Maalouf ‏ on X - "In Nice, France, a street pianist was harassed by a North African migrant who demanded he stop playing because music is ‘haram.’ What kind of antisocial, aggressive, Stone Age behavior is this?!"
If you criticise the migrant, that's Islamophobia

Meme - Wall Street Mav: "Zero countries in Europe want incoming migrants. They all want deportations. Yet for some reason, their governments refuse to do it. Why?"
Infodex: "% of respondents who feel their country takes in too many migrants
Greece: 90% Cyprus: 84% Ireland: 78% Germany: 77% Austria: 77% Bulgaria: 76% Poland: 75% Italy: 74% Belgium: 73% Czechia: 72% Spain: 70% France: 70% Sweden: 70% Finland: 68% Estonia: 68% Lithuania: 63%: Latvia: 61% Portugal: 57% Slovakia: 57% Denmark: 57% Romania: 57%"
It's only Oligarchy for countries to pursue policies the majority of their people don't want when those policies hurt the left wing agenda

Meme - International Cyber Digest @lntCyberDigest: "Update: Since you liked our post yesterday about ethnic groups that miss payments and commit fraud compared to native Dutch, here's an update with the new data leaked today. We analysed Odido customers who missed payments or were flagged for fraud, inferring background from last names. Turks are 8.8x more likely to commit fraud than native Dutch, while people with North African, Arab or Sub-Saharan African surnames (combined) are 6.1x more likely. All non-Western name proxies are 6.6x more likely to commit fraud than native Dutch. This is just an experiment to show what can be done with Odido data and Al. It is also data that policymakers should take seriously."
"Fraud Committers - Times More Represented Than Native Dutch (Native Dutch = 1.0^ baseline)"
"Fraud Committers - All Non-Western vs Native Dutch"

Rolf Degen on X - "Male refugees from Afghanistan and Syria  in Germany show a keen interest in forming relationships with local women, but the local women show little interest in forming relationships with them.            Germany, in particular, received over 1,4 million refugees between 2014 and 2016, predominantly from Muslim-majority countries such as Syria and Afghanistan. The majority of these arrivals consisted of young, single men within prime marriageable age brackets. This study examines partnership preferences of male refugees from Afghanistan and Syria who arrived in Germany between 2014 and 2016 and female residents of similar age.            Overall, our results indicate a high level of openness among male refugees towards partnering with female members of the resident population, but a comparatively low level of openness among the latter towards partnering with recently arrived male refugees. This implies a substantial incongruence in partnership preferences among the two groups.           Regarding the educational level of a potential partner, we found that all respondents prefer highly educated partners over those with lower levels of education. This suggests that, for refugees, securing a highly educated partner might serve as a means of upward social mobility and integration into higher-status networks in the host society.            Furthermore, it is possible that highly educated women, due to their greater exposure to diverse social environments and potentially less discriminatory attitudes, are perceived as more open to intergroup partnerships, making them a more attractive choice for refugees seeking acceptance and social integration.            On the other hand, the reluctance of resident women to accept partnerships with refugees is largely explained by their rejection of the ‘imported’ religious Islam. It is possible that resident women perceive the religious practices of newly arrived refugees as different from their own, reinforcing a social distance that limits intergroup partnerships. Moreover, this reluctance might not only reflect religious differences but also concerns about gender norms or perceived lifestyle incompatibilities."
Holly Grayle on X - "And another thing: Why is it that "male refugees from Afghanistan and Syria in Germany show a keen interest in forming relationships with local women"? Where are the Afghan and Syrian women??? Back in Afghanistan and Syria, where they were abandoned by these 'men'.  Women are typically hardwired to select strong, stable men who are capable and willing to provide for and protect their wife and children against exactly the type of men these 'academics' are referring to. These academics know this - everyone knows this - which makes their enquiry even more sinister."

Russia sends migrants into Europe through secret tunnels - "Military experts say the only Middle Eastern groups known to be capable of such tunnels are Hamas in the Gaza Strip, Hezbollah in Lebanon, certain factions in Kurdistan, and possibly Islamic State... Under Lukashenko, who has ruled for more than 30 years, Belarus has played an active role in Putin’s attempts to destabilise the West via waves of migration.  Even prior to the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Belarus was used as a staging area to send thousands of migrants across the Polish border, prompting Warsaw to build a 200km fence with 300 cameras."
Clearly, the moral thing to do is accept them all, because Russia is totally not trying to destroy Europe with this plan

Links - 14th May 2026 (2 - Feminism)

Meme - "*NPC Rey from Star Wars* Greetings! I am your current-year female protagonist
I'm 5'4", 112 lbs, not in particularly good shape for someone my size, but I can take on a room full of 6'6" 230 lbs guys with job titles like "Goon" and "Henchmen" with very little effort.
My personality is getting upset when men tell me I cant do something that would most likely end with me getting hurt or killed.
Enjoy my poorly written and poorly made movies and TV shows or you are a tiny dicked incel.
I project zero sexuality or femininity unless there's a mix-raced POC lesbian character and even then it'll be removed from the film in the Middle East and China."

DataRepublican (small r) on X - "UN Women almost certainly literally funds the Taliban. The US government gives about 18 million annually to UN Women, but private entities give an additional 27 million. Their top three private partners are the Gates Foundation, Open Society, and Ford Foundation. Afghanistan is one of their top expense countries, but Afghanistan's banking system is in collapse and it's reported NGOs can only operate there if they pay tax and duties to the Taliban."

Meme - "99% of Men
Protect Provide Sacrifice
1% of Men
Rape Abuse Murder
FEMINIST "MEN NEED TO STOP RAPING AND KILLING US!!!"
Plus, feminists promote pro-crime policies, which make women less safe. It's almost as if they want to endanger women to get more power

Meme - UN Women @UN_Women: "With active conflicts at its highest level since 1946, the role of women in peacebuilding is more important than ever. Alongside women on the ground, @UN Women is uplifting women's leadership to realize a peaceful world #ForAllWomenAndGirls, Learn more:
*women in full face veils*
WHEN WOMEN AD, PEACE FOLLOWS"
Abby Libby @abbythelibb_: "Was the photo choice supposed to be a woman who would be murdered by male family members if she tried to pursue leadership in her society?"

Meme - "*Boy playing in mud with worm* *Men building trebuchet in backyard and drinking beer with thumbs up*
*Old men on deck in chairs laughing* *Man having burnt BBQ*
THIS is boys will be boys."

WHO Is Falsifying the Truth about Women in Medical Research - "Feminists often achieve their goals by bending and subverting the truth. Sometimes their falsehoods are misrepresentations. Other times, the claims are outright untruths. A recent social media post by the World Health Organization falls in the latter category.  On March 8, the WHO issued a Twitter post featuring Dr. Gaya Gamhewage, a senior manager at the World Health Organization (1). She made this disturbing claim:  “Did you know? For decades, medical research and treatment plans have focused mainly on men, leaving women out of the picture.”  But Gamhewage’s claim is flatly untrue.  Since 1995, the U.S. National Institutes of Health has tracked the number of male and female participants in NIH-funded research. A recent study by James Nuzzo reveals that year after year, the number of females has exceeded the number of males. “Averaged over the 28-year period, females made up 58% of participants in NIH-funded research trials,” Nuzzo concludes (2).  This conclusion is affirmed by analyses of subsets of research studies:
A 1979 review of NIH-supported clinical trials revealed that 268 trials included both men and women, 12 studies were male-only, and 13 were only for women. (3)
A review of the MedLine database for the years 1966-1990 identified 753 studies involving men and 854 studies involving women (4).
A 2001 General Accounting Office report revealed, “GAO found that women were a majority of the clinical trial participants in the new drug applications (NDA) it examined.” (5)
Additional analyses reveal that funding for women’s health has never lagged, compared to men. Overall, 14% of the NIH research budget has been allocated to women’s health, while only 6% has gone for men’s health (6).  Despite this overwhelming evidence, activists like Gamhewage continue to make the claim that women were routinely excluded from or underrepresented in medical research, a wild statement that undermines the credibility of the entire WHO organization.  The fact is, it’s men, not women who have been shortchanged by the research enterprise. Dr. Gamhewage needs to retract her false assertion and set the record straight."
Another feminist myth debunked

Facebook - "For several decades, Australia introduced affirmative action measures designed to help girls and women overcome historical barriers. Those measures were explicitly framed as temporary. But temporary policies have quietly become permanent institutions, supported by billions of dollars of taxpayer funding and a large policy ecosystem that continues to frame women as disadvantaged, even as many of the most visible disparities now affect men and boys... Today we see:
• Boys falling behind girls across literacy, school completion, and university participation
• Men experiencing significantly shorter life expectancy
• Male suicide rates three to four times higher than female rates
• Vastly higher male workplace fatalities
• Major health disparities affecting men
• Limited services for male victims of violence and abuse
In this context, continuing a large taxpayer-funded “female advancement industry” without reassessment raises legitimate questions about fairness and public policy priorities."

Hunter Ash on X - "The two best predictors of educational success are IQ and conscientiousness. Men have a small advantage in IQ, and the two sexes have equal conscientiousness on average. Yet women are surpassing men in educational attainment. This should update us towards a view that the education system is biased towards women and girls."

Simone & Malcolm Collins on X - "Academia has been ignoring the fact that teachers discriminate AGAINST BOYS in EVERY subject, giving boys lower grades than girls when the gender of students is known.  From Victor Lavy's 2008 study "Do Gender Stereotypes Reduce Girls' or Boys' Human Capital Outcomes?  Evidence from a Natural Experiment" (Journal of Public Economics) -  Researchers in Israel compared blind-graded national exams (student names/gender were hidden) to regular teacher-graded exams, expecting to find a bias against girls.   Instead they found the opposite - consistent discrimination against boys across humanities and sciences.   Lavy admitted to being surprised by the results, but academia responded with silence.  There were no big follow-up studies, and no calls for reforms to remedy the discrimination against boys.  Findings like this, which reveal a systemic anti-male bias, often get buried because they contradict the feminist narrative.  Just one of many reasons to pull your boys out of the school system and homeschool!"

World Economic Forum on X - "#Women spend 25% more of their lives in poor health or with disabilities than men. The women’s #health gap means the global #economy is missing out on $1 trillion annually – and likely more:"
James L. Nuzzo, PhD on X - "A man who dies by suicide at age 28 doesn't live long enough to develop arthritis. Anyway, it's important to recognise what groups like the WEF and UN do. They continually portray men and women as combatants in a zero-sum game for health attention. This is why they continually ignore the sex difference in life expectancy and focus instead on quality of life and years of life in disability. In their minds, it's a battle of the sexes. So, they go with the data that favours attention to females. This is childish. There is no reason why sex differences in life expectancy cannot be acknowledged at the same time as sex differences in years in poor health/disability, etc. All of it is important, but to them, only half of it is important."

UF Researcher: Lesbians Encounter Same Problems As Married Women - "Lesbian couples face the same problems of domestic violence and unequal division of household chores that married heterosexual women do in their relationships, a new University of Florida study finds.  About 14 percent of 168 lesbians surveyed who were in committed relationships admitted they battered or were battered by their partners at least once a month, said Janis Weber, who did the research for her doctoral dissertation in sociology at UF. A similar number of women in heterosexual relationships suffer from domestic abuse, she said.  "The only difference between these women and their heterosexual counterparts is they feel completely ostracized from normal channels of help," Weber said. "If they call the police, the officer would likely laugh and say ‘Oh right, your girlfriend beat you up.' And they're persona non grata at shelters because these are usually battered spouse shelters."   The study of 84 lesbian couples found that lesbians who beat their partners fit the profile of heterosexuals who did so because they also abused their authority and tried to control their partners. The victims resembled their heterosexual counterparts in making excuses for the abuse or the abusive partner.  "That is completely consistent with ‘battered women syndrome,'" Weber said.  The study broke new ground in finding that lesbians have the same complaints as married women about the distribution of household chores, Weber said. Other researchers contend that lesbian couples share equally because, as women, they realize that household labor always has been associated with low status, she said. Only 17 percent of the couples in the UF study reported sharing equally in these tasks, which included preparing meals, washing dishes and taking out the garbage...   Generally, the woman who made less money in the relationship did the most work...   More than 80 percent of the women said they believed each partner did her fair share of housework, even though one of them really did much more"
Damn patriarchy!
Or, when chores are divided, women will always feel the division is unfair, because women are never happy

Meme - JACBailey @)JCBailey1: "UK Government: boys are going online and seeing so much misogyny, the manosphere is creating toxic masculinity and needs to be controlled! Meanwhile girls are going online and seeing this and no one says anything..."
Men Are Human @men_are_human: "Enjoy sipping box wine with your cats."
"The male loneliness epidemic is severe enough *woman kicking man*"
Tea cozy: "Women proudly hating men like this radicalized more men into misogyny than any red pilled manosphere content ever could"

What Is The Left Saying About Male Loneliness? - "The loneliness epidemic is a regular staple in today’s news cycle. And more often than not, the conversation is about men... While there’s a clear disparity in interest, survey results generally find that loneliness does not discriminate by sex. Men and women of all ages show similar levels of loneliness, while younger Americans report feeling more disconnected than older adults... Given the noise on the left, we decided to turn to BlueSky—a left-leaning, politically-engaged platform— to see what “the people” think about the issue... we found that posts pinning the blame on men, denying an epidemic exists, or suggesting that men “deserve it” (Category One) received the most likes and reposts, with satirical or ironic posts (Category Four) trailing in popularity"
Feminists just hate men

Researchers find reverse sexual double standard in sextech use - "A new study published in The Journal of Sex Research has found that men who use sexual technology are viewed with more disgust than women who engage in the same behaviors. The findings indicate a “reverse sexual double standard” in which men face harsher social penalties for using devices like sex toys, chatbots, and robots, particularly as the technology becomes more humanlike. This research suggests that deep-seated gender norms continue to influence how society perceives sexual expression and the integration of technology into intimate lives... While the use of vibrators by women has been largely normalized and framed as a tool for empowerment or sexual wellness, men’s use of similar devices often lacks the same social acceptance. Media depictions frequently portray men who use sex robots or dolls as socially isolated or unable to form human connections.  “Anecdotally, but also in research, discussions around using sexech tend to highlight vibrator use as a positive and empowering addition to female sexuality, while the use of devices designed for male anatomy (like sex dolls or Fleshlights) is more often viewed negatively or as unnecessary,” said study author Madison E. Williams, a PhD student at the University of New Brunswick and member of the Sex Meets Relationships Lab... Across the board, participants rated men who used sextech as more disgusting than women who used the same devices. This effect was consistent regardless of the participant’s own gender. Both men and women viewed male sextech users more negatively...   “Our findings suggest that men who use sex toys, exchange sexual messages with AI companions, or have sex with robots are perceived as more disgusting than women who engage in equivalent acts,” Williams told PsyPost. “This highlights a troubling double standard that penalizes men for using sexual devices, even though research has found they can offer both women and men similar sexual benefits.”"
Yet another sexual double standard feminists don't care about
Aka a woman with a vibrator is seen as empowered, but a man with a masturbator/pocket pussy is seen as creepy

Kinsey Institute researchers find fewer than half of women would date an adult virgin, compared to two-thirds of men who would : r/psychologyofsex - "Anecdotally, a lot of women will profess to a lack of desire in having to “teach” men how to have sex. Given that pleasure and orgasm are not guaranteed for women, it makes sense that they would place greater emphasis on performance and be less tolerant of a rookie than men. Women also express insecurities that an inexperienced man might experience FOMO, retroactive jealousy or resentment. Again plausible as later-in-life celibacy in men tends to be involuntary, as studies further down show. Social scientists offer an alternative explanation.  Theresa E. DiDonato, professor of psychology and the Associate Dean for Social Sciences and Graduate Programs at Loyola University Maryland, wrote in Psychology Today: “The information that a person had a small handful of prior partners might serve as a relationship-decision heuristic: if they had appealed to others, they might appeal to me. This is consistent with the idea of mate copying when one woman uses another's hard work vetting a particular guy as information that he's worth having a relationship with” (2023).  The idea is that beyond late adolescence and early adulthood, when men are expected to become sexually initiated, a man’s non-virgin status often serves as a shorthand cue for women that he is socially well-adjusted and sexually desirable."

Meme - "When I say "we still need feminism in our world" and someone responds "what rights do men have that women don't?" so i lowk just crash out"

Meme - Daddy's Girl: "All women deserve to voice their opinions!"
TradWife: "I have opinions that are different from the trendy popular opinions."
Crying and Upset Daddy's Girl: "Ew! Fascist pick me! We don't claim you!"

Possum Reviews on X - "I like how whether it's "us women have to wear makeup to live up to the impossible standards of men" or "us women wear makeup for ourselves, not to impress men" depends entirely one whichever argument is more convenient at the moment."

Fireman wrongly sacked after saying woman he rescued ‘looked haggard’ - "A fire

man was wrongly sacked after saying that a 30-year-old woman he rescued “looked haggard for her age”, a tribunal has ruled.  Pete Langton, a crew commander in Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire, was dismissed in 2023 after being reported for “misogyny” over the comments.  He was accused of having upset female colleagues with his comments on the woman’s appearance."

Ashley Zavala on X - "New: Dolores Huerta writes lengthy statement following @nytimes investigation into Cesar Chavez. Huerta says she had sexual encounters with Chavez resulting in 2 children. “I have kept a secret because I believed that exposing the truth would hurt the farm worker movement…”"

Jemele Hill on X - "Dolores Huerta chose to hide and suppress her own pain for the sake of the movement. She had to sit there as her (alleged) rapist was being glorified as a freedom fighter. I cannot imagine."
Lydia Polgreen on X - "I recently learned Jessica Mitford was raped by a black man during the civil rights movement (random dark alley assault) and she never reported it because it would have been a death sentence to her assailant. What women in movements suffer…"
Ceb K. on X - "Jessica Mitford helped the Communist Party produce an entirely fake wife for a black rapist on death row, to testify to his innocence. This was one of the key triggers of the civil rights movement, along with equally fake CPUSA pro-rape activism like the Scottsboro Boys case etc."
To feminists, pushing the left wing agenda is more important than women's rights

Brazil Senate Passes Bill (Dec 2025): Repeatedly Interrupting a Woman Can Now Be Criminalized as “Misogyny” – Up to 5 Years in Prison. : r/MensRights - "The Brazilian Senate just approved (December 2025) a bill that equates misogyny with racial injury (a crime punishable by up to 5 years in prison). One of the explicit examples of “misogyny” in the approved text: repeatedly interrupting a woman with the intent to silence or discredit her (in debates, workplaces, or public spaces). A similar punishment already existed under the Political Gender Violence Law; now they are expanding the concept to everyday life. The bill now heads to the lower house (Chamber of Deputies). If it passes there and gets sanctioned, it becomes law.
Official link to the bill: https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/materias/2025/10/22/misoginia-deve-ser-tratada-como-crime-de-discriminacao-aprova-ccj
My opinion: In women's pursuit of more rights, they are unbalancing the scales and creating a dictatorship while segregating men."
Disagreeing with a woman out loud is misogyny and a crime

Meme - Kim Goodwin @kimgoodwin: "I have had more than one male colleague sincerely ask whether a certain behavior is mansplaining. Since apparently this is hard to figure out, I made one of them a chart."
"Am I mansplaining?
Did she ask you to explain it? Yes. Not mansplaining
Do you have more relevant experience? Would most men with her education & experience already know this? Did you ask if she needed it explained? Yes, she said she did. Not mansplaining
No to the above: Probably or Definitely mansplaining/stop talking now"
Seb Dean @bigsebdean: "So, basically don't help people in case you offend them by trying to do a nice thing? #militant"
Basically, mansplaining is when a woman doesn't ask a man to explain something but he does anyway. Men are not allowed to disagree with women or to even speak when a woman is speaking (that is considered interrupting)

Max on X - "One of the most interesting things i’ve learned from this book so far is the topic of mansplaining, and how what women perceive as misogyny is actually the man being an egalitarian.  I’ll try to summarize.   From a high level: the feminine trusts the experts, while the masculine verifies them.   This means that among women when it comes to who gets to make the decision or pontificate on the topic, they try to figure out who knows the most about it and then they quietly listen and follow her advice.   While among men, when someone asserts themselves as an expert, the other men see this as a bid for power, and so they challenge them to make sure that they are genuinely an expert and deserving of their subordination to him on this topic.  So what happens is that women expect other people to not challenge them on the things they perceive themselves as the expert on. Say, if she is the project manager, everyone who is not the project manager should defer to her judgement.   But what happens when dealing with a man is that he challenges her, and the more she tries to say “erm sweety i’m the expert” the more he feels the need to challenge her.  What he wants and expects is that if she truly is the expert, she can show him how he is wrong and his idea is stupid and prove that she deserves the title of SME on this so that he can respect and trust her judgement.   However to her this offensive and rude. And furthermore, she doesn’t see him do this to the men so he must be questioning her or pontificating despite not knowing as much because she is a woman. But what’s actually the case is that he did do that to the men too, they just proved to him that they deserved the title and so he stopped. There is this introductory period of shit testing that the others passed.   But because no one has ever challenged her before, all the girlies just say “oh you’re so smart ms expert” she’s not experienced at fighting back. And so even when she does genuinely know more, she fumbles the shit test and loses his respect, making him more likely to challenge her in the future.  The most ironic bit here is that what she perceives of as misogyny is actually him being a radical egalitarian. Most men are brought up to treat a woman with kid gloves and not do this type of shit testing as hard as they do with men. But as we’ve dissolved these practices, more and more men are not seeing gender and do treat women like men and they get decried as sexist."
Gender equality is misogyny. Women want special treatment
This ties in to the left wing love of just "trusting" "experts"

Meme - "How feminists look at Sharia law countries that throw gay people off roofs and allow child marriage *loving look*"

︎ ︎venom on X - "Another day of feminists spreading fake news. Hedy Lamarr didn’t invent Wi-Fi.
> Hedy Lamarr, along with George Antheil, patented a radio-controlled torpedo system using frequency-hopping in 1942.
> The concept itself already existed in radio engineering decades earlier, with predecessors like Nikola Tesla’s 1898 radio-controlled boat patent, Hans von Baeyer’s 1919 work, and more.
> Their version used mechanical synchronization, Antheil’s area of expertise.
> Modern Wi-Fi was developed decades later through the IEEE 802.11 standards process, with key contributions from multiple engineers, including Dr. John O’Sullivan and his team in the 1990s.
But to promote feminist ideology, they call Hedy Lamarr the mother of Wi-Fi, while the men who really built it are forgotten."
Obsidian yogi on X - "We are just living in an era where men are being degraded just to promote women. It's very forceful at this point. Movies, shows, news, and history are all being made and altered to make women look smarter and stronger, while men do the heavy lifting."

California Ethnic Studies Curriculum Revives Aztec Religion

From 2021. Apparently the First Amendment only means schools can't sponsor Christian prayer. It doesn't mean students can't be made to worship other gods (while the indoctrination project has stalled... for now, the attempt is still very revealing).

 

California Ethnic Studies Curriculum Revives Aztec Religion | National Review
Apparently, for the sake of the state's schoolchildren, we need to set the record straight on the blood-soaked worship of ancient deities.

T he Board of Education in California recently voted unanimously to approve an Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum for use in all of the state’s public schools. As our editorial pointed out on the day the vote was taken, this curriculum is “probably the most radical, polemical, and ideologically loaded educational document ever offered up for public consideration in the free world.” It’s a purpose-built program of indoctrination into the worst kind of tribal politics — a project of social engineering designed to erase the unique personal distinctiveness of the human being and remake each of us into avatars of our immutable characteristics. The knowledge that entire generations of Californians will soon be catechized in the dogmas of such a bleak and thoroughly political gospel is almost too grievous to bear.

As I noted a few weeks ago, the most astonishing part of the curriculum is the section that deals with religion:

Students are to be taught that white Christian settlers committed “theocide” against indigenous tribes when they arrived in the New World by murdering Native American gods and replacing them with the Christian God. According to the curriculum, this replacement ushered in a regime defined by “coloniality, dehumanization, and genocide,” and the “explicit erasure and replacement of holistic Indigeneity and humanity.” But all is not lost, we are told. For students will learn that they have the power and the responsibility to build a social order defined by “countergenocide,” which will eventually supplant the last vestiges of colonial Christianity and pave the way for the “regeneration of indigenous epistemic and cultural futurity.”

The curriculum presents the pagan gods of the Aztec empire as worthier objects of study and veneration than Jesus of Nazareth. This presentation does not rest at the level of theory or academic inquiry. As Christopher F. Rufo has observed, teachers are encouraged by the authors of the curriculum to lead their students in an “ethnic studies community chant,” which takes the form of worship offered up to these deities:

Students first clap and chant to the god Tezkatlipoka — whom the Aztecs traditionally worshipped with human sacrifice and cannibalism — asking him for the power to be “warriors” for “social justice.” Next, the students chant to the gods Quetzalcoatl, Huitzilopochtli, and Xipe Totek, seeking “healing epistemologies” and “a revolutionary spirit.” Huitzilopochtli, in particular, is the Aztec deity of war and inspired hundreds of thousands of human sacrifices during Aztec rule. Finally, the chant comes to a climax with a request for “liberation, transformation, [and] decolonization,” after which students shout “Panche beh! Panche beh!” in pursuit of ultimate “critical consciousness.”

Even a passing knowledge of Aztec history raises serious questions about this ritual (a passing knowledge of the First Amendment raises even more, but that’s a different matter). None, though, is more important than the question of what, precisely, has brought these deities back to life after so many centuries of slumber. Why do teachers and administrators in California want to revive these Aztec cults and set them favorably against Christianity?

We can’t ask this question properly — let alone answer it — without taking at least a cursory look at Aztec history and searching for the virtues that California’s Board of Education thinks it has found in the cults of these Mesoamerican deities.

The principal place of worship in the Aztec empire was the Templo Mayor in the city of Tenochtitlan, which was made up of twin pyramids, one dedicated to Huitzilopochtli, god of the sun, and the other to Tlaloc, the god of rain. Like all the Aztec gods, Huitzilopochtli and Tlaloc had an insatiable appetite for human sacrifice. The priests of Huitzilopochtli would appease their patron deity by laying out a sacrificial victim on a stone at the apex of the god’s pyramid, carving out said victim’s heart (while he or she was still alive), and then rolling the body down the side of the pyramid, at the base of which it was then dismembered and either disposed of or eaten. Post-conquest sources report that at the reconsecration of this pyramid in 1487, about 80,400 people were sacrificed in this way over the course of just four days. Even historians who regard this number as an exaggeration concede that the victim tally was probably still in the tens of thousands.

He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.

Tlaloc was an even less attractive figure. He had a particular predilection for the sacrifice of children. The remains of more than 40 boys and girls were discovered at the excavation site of the great pyramid, most bearing the marks of severe and prolonged torture. This was to be expected given that the Aztec pictorial codices that have come down to us invariably show the children crying before being sacrificed. The priests of Tlaloc believed the tears of innocent children to be particularly pleasing to the god, and they took great care to ensure that their little victims were crying before and throughout the ceremony so that the smoke of the sacrificial fire would carry their tears up to the god above at the moment of death. The ritual began with the bones of the children being broken, their hands or their feet burned, and carvings etched into their flesh. They were then paraded before the celebrants of the ritual while crying. Insufficient tears from the children were believed to result in insufficient rains for the crops that year, so no brutality was spared. At the end of it all, the mutilated victims were burned alive.

But Jesus called the children to him and said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these.”

Tezcatlipoca, who also makes an appearance in the new Californian catalogue of venerable deities, was thought to be the most powerful of the Aztec gods. He held sway over darkness, night, sorcery, and witchcraft. He also had it within his power to disrupt the social comity and felicity of the gods themselves and was, for that reason, particularly to be feared. He was worshipped with many different forms of sacrifice. One of these involved dressing the victim in splendid warrior regalia and then tying him to a stake or a wall. Aztec warriors would then “battle” with him in a mocking and derisory manner, drawing this ritual of humiliation and torture out so as to entertain the god and themselves for as long as possible.

And when they had platted a crown of thorns, they put it upon his head, and a reed in his right hand: and they bowed the knee before him, and mocked him, saying, “Hail, King of the Jews!” And they spit upon him, and took the reed, and smote him on the head. And after that they had mocked him, they took the robe off from him, and put his own raiment on him, and led him away to crucify him. 

These are the deities to whom the Christian god owes theological reparations in the eyes of California’s education establishment. Italicized passages from the Christian scriptures have been interspersed above so that readers can judge for themselves which of the two religions is better characterized by “coloniality, dehumanization, and genocide.” I have discussed just the three most prominent Aztec gods, but the reader inclined to follow up with his or her own research will find in the entire pantheon of Mesoamerican deities not a single redeemable characteristic.

It was long thought by historians of an anticolonial bent that the conquistadors greatly exaggerated their accounts of Aztec cruelty for polemical purposes. This is no longer the case. Ample documentary and archaeological evidence now exists showing that the Aztecs were as gratuitously cruel as the Spanish colonists originally reported them to be.

The question remains, then, as to why a cabal of social engineers in California want to present these religious beliefs in a positive light to American children. It’s certainly not because they think these gods and their human servants were morally impressive or humane in and of themselves. A few loons in the QAnon crowd might think so, but those in possession of their higher critical faculties would never even entertain the notion.

No, the real reason that the authors of California’s Ethnic Studies Curriculum take a positive view of Aztec religion and a negative view of Christianity is because the Aztec gods lost the battle of religious orthodoxies and the New World and the Christian God won. It really is as simple as that.

In its most radical form, left-leaning social and historical analysis begins with the axiom that coercive and violent power is the only variable in human social arrangements. Life is conceived as a zero-sum competition between groups. All other factors that might be said to account for the disparities in success between these groups — in terms of human capital, material conditions, or governing ideas — are seen as elaborate veneers disguising the raw power-struggle of group conflict. This axiomatic starting point leads inevitably to the conclusion that the reigning social order achieved its dominance by oppressing the groups it is thought to have marginalized. This is why words like “dominance,” “oppression,” and “marginalization” have become commonplaces of our political lexicon.

The classical Marxist variation on this theme is, of course, an economic one: The story goes that the capitalists and the bourgeoisie have established and cemented the current global economic system by oppressing the proletariat. But a great deal of the post-1960s Left has supplemented Marx’s economic categories with a whole host of others: race, gender, sexual orientation, religious affiliation, nationality, and so on. The great oppressor is no longer just the capitalist but the straight, white, imperialist, European, cisgender, Christian male capitalist. This is the innovation of intersectionality. Any advantage that people belonging to the dominant groups have gained over marginalized groups across the centuries is thought to be the result of a rigged social order. The advantages — or “privilege” — that the descendants of the historic oppressors enjoy are presented as ill-gotten gains.

Understood within this framework, the story of the Aztecs is a simple one. They were a Native American, non-Christian people who were conquered by European Christian imperialists. Their defeat at the hands of Western civilization, which has had the temerity and the wickedness to last as long as it has by oppressing the downtrodden of the Earth, is enough to endow their religious practices with a nobility and a virtue that is entirely separate from its content.

For the most extreme elements of the Left, the mere fact of being powerful or successful is incriminating. The mere fact of being the insurgent underdog is exonerating. Noam Chomsky’s long and ignominious tenure as useful idiot in chief to the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia and his concomitant downplaying of the killing fields is only one example of this. Another is the common idea that white people cannot be the victims of racism. Because white people have, according to many on the intersectional left, achieved hegemonic power in society through the use of violence, they cannot be deemed victims of racism in any sense unless and until people of color have exercised enough violence themselves to overturn the oppressive existing social order. Until that point, which is never concretely defined, a white person can have no legitimate complaint against a person of color. No room for historical complexity or attention to detail is allowed.

When John Locke pulled the disparate elements of classical liberalism together into a coherent philosophy, he did so not for the purpose of framing a government but for justifying revolution. Overthrow, rather than order, is the basic political instinct of liberalism, which is why, once the War of Independence was won, the Founding Fathers had to turn to classical republicanism for language suitable to framing a constitution. The zanier offshoots of liberalism’s wild-eyed cousin progressivism merely take this spirit of revolution to the nth degree. Gods of child sacrifice can be championed within this framework so long as they are insurgent gods; so long as they are underdogs sticking it to “the Man” — even when the Man is Jesus Christ himself.

The early Christians were of the view that the pagan gods were not necessarily unreal; rather, they were simply demons that human beings had been duped into worshipping as deities. This seems strange to us moderns, who are so reflexively suspicious of the supernatural. But the particular demands of the Aztec gods are, I think, depraved enough to cause even the most skeptical among us to consider for a moment that there might be more than material evils at work among us. Whether or not one takes a metaphysical or a metaphorical view of the matter, it cannot be denied that our social tendency to give the benefit of the doubt to defeated parties, to failed insurgents, has unleashed demonic forces into the world. Playing on that American tendency, Hamas, Hezbollah, the IRA, and other terrorist groups have drawn ill-informed support for their violent ends over the years. The authors of the new California curriculum are now exploiting precisely the same sympathy in the arena of education.

In many ways their curriculum is a lot like the stone altar that once stood at the top of the Great Pyramid of Tenochtitlan. It’s at the apex of an ideological edifice that has taken decades, if not centuries, to construct. The values that it consecrates wouldn’t be tolerated without this edifice, which lends it legitimacy, authority, and respectability. And, most importantly and terribly of all, many of our children will be sacrificed on it if we accord the cult it serves more respect and more tolerance than it rightly deserves.    

Links - 14th May 2026 (1 - Migrants)

Meme - *Boardroom Meeting Suggestion* "I need suggestions how to stop these terrorist attacks!"
"More mosques?"
"Bow to Mecca?"
"Stop importing terrorists?"
*Last guy thrown out of window*

Half of all recent refugees in Australia are on welfare - "Half of all recent refugees who have settled permanently in Australia are on unemployment benefits, 44% can’t speak English, and one in five have a long-term health condition. According to official data released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) this week, the cohort of asylum seekers – called “humanitarian migrants” by the ABS – who arrived since 2017 have had far worse settlement outcomes than previous streams."

Yuri Bezmenov's Ghost on X - "Larry Fink of Blackrock now says countries that avoided mass immigration will be better positioned for the future. Mass immigration was always a scam to destabilize the West, it’s why China admits almost zero refugees."

Stephen Miller on X - "Fake asylum claims for illegals is a multibillion industry funded by taxpayers (via NGOs). Virtually 100% of illegals arrested in the interior will file fake asylum claims. This in turn creates permanent employment and income for the left’s most extreme and radicalized attorneys."
Wilfred Reilly on X - "This IS just true. Anyone to know an immigration lawyer is aware of it. Proportionately speaking, virtually no one from Mexico, Costa Rica or Guatemala, Poland/East Europe, India, the DR, El Salvador under Bukele, Kenya, etc has an asylum claim in any real sense. There's no war in these legendary tourist destinations! These is economic migrants - and well coached ones at that :)."

Taya on X - "Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi caused a major stir in the National Diet during her policy speech by saying that encouraging people to have more children is the so

lution to Japan’s population decline. She also criticized foreigners who don’t respect Japanese cultural customs. Globalists were so upset they tried to interrupt her speech."

由仁アリン Arin Yuni on X - "THE LDP HAS WON ALL 30 DISTRICTS IN TOKYO!!!"
Kangmin Lee | 이강민 on X - "Thank you nuisance streamers and third world foreigners You have successfully radicalized all of Tokyo to become right-wing"

William Meijer on X - "In The Culture Transplant (2022), immigration economist @GarettJones has 5 predictions for the West if mass immigration from low-trust, poor countries were to continue:
1. The quality of government would fall; corruption would rise.
2. Social conflict would increase—and so would the risk of civil war.
3. Trust—and probably trustworthiness—toward strangers would decline.
4. Support would rise for higher minimum wages and laws making it harder to fire workers.
5. Innovation would decline overall, and since new innovations eventually spread across the entire planet, the entire planet would eventually lose out."

William Meijer on X - "Universalism, the psychological foundation of liberal democracy, is a trait not evenly distributed across the world and not easy to instill. If Universalists (green) unilaterally cooperate with Tribalists (orange), universalism, and the freedom, health, and wealth it creates, will cease to exist. The paradox of universalism is that it only works with universalists. The paradox of liberal democracy is that it cannot survive liberal immigration"

Inherited Trust and Growth - "This paper develops a new method to uncover the causal effect of trust on economic growth by focusing on the inherited component of trust and its time variation. We show that inherited trust of descendants of US immigrants is significantly influenced by the country of origin and the timing of arrival of their forebears. We thus use the inherited trust of descendants of US immigrants as a time-varying measure of inherited trust in their country of origin. This strategy allows to identify the sizeable causal impact of inherited trust on worldwide growth during the twentieth century by controlling for country fixed effects"

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 on X - "Australia's far-left Race Discrimination Commissioner Giridharan Sivaraman denounced Australia as “STOLEN LAND" and said that he felt closer to Indian National Day than Australia Day. As an Australian I feel that his use of the term “stolen land” incites fear and hatred towards European Australians. We need to look at this as possible hate speech."
John Carter on X - "The implicit meaning of this framing is that Anglos stole the land so it's only fair for them to give hundreds of millions of Hindoids the opportunity to steal the land. Revealed preference demonstrates this. If he believes the land is stolen, and he believes theft is morally wrong, then he would not accept a salary of hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Australian government (this is blood money), and he wouldn't live in Australia. Since he doesn't do either of those things, he either doesn't believe what he's saying, or he does but he doesn't think theft is bad, in which case he's simply trying to emotionally manipulate white Australians by using their own morality against them in order to guilt them into continuing to allow him and people like him to parasitize the Australian people."
John Carter on X - "It really cannot be emphasized enough how dishonest all of this is. America stole land from the natives, purchased some African farm equipment, and has always been a "nation of immigrants", therefore "open the borders and give us your country." Canada is built on stolen land, sent some kids to boarding school, and has also always been a "nation of immigrants", therefore "Let my people in, saar." Australia, same narrative as Canada. New Zealand, same as Australia. Britain did an imperialism, therefore "your country belongs to us now, saar." France, same as England. Spain, same as France. Ireland never had an empire and hasn't had slaves since the Viking Age, and indeed was itself colonized by England ... therefore Ireland must accept unlimited migration in solidarity with other post-colonial countries. Germany was too mean to Jews for a few years, therefore Germans must abolish themselves and give their country to North Africans. The only peoples the Swedes ever conquered or enslaved were neighbouring Europeans, but Sweden might have sold some iron that might have gotten used on some slave ships a few centuries ago, therefore must open its borders to Bomalians and give them all the rape toys they can penetrate. The justification differs, but the conclusion is always the same: open borders and ethnic replacement. The uniformity of the repugnant conclusion indicates that these narratives are formed by reasoning back from that tendentious repugnance, with the arguments tailored to national conditions using whatever specific historical circumstances are handy, with the intent of emotionally manipulating native populations into laying down their arms, foregoing resistance, and placidly accepting the loss of their countries to the hundreds of millions of third-worlders intent on flooding every developed white country on the planet. The people making these arguments don't believe a word that they say. Their seething resentment for Europeans is entirely real, but this is almost entirely an inferiority complex, humiliation at having been so easily conquered and then taught to eat and wipe with something other than their hands. They don't believe that slavery or conquest are wrong: if they did, they wouldn't still practice slavery, and they wouldn't be trying to conquer the West in the guise of beggars, by shamelessly playing to our pity and misplaced guilt. They say these things in order to trick you by playing on a conscience they don't have themselves. It's a sales tactic, and they're selling you annihilation."

Meme - Fat purple haired woman with glasses and star earrings: "Imagine liking quesadillas... and being against open borders."

Thread by @mikitaposts on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "Restore Britain gets labeled right-wing even though their immigration policy is still significantly more open than China’s, the socialist country constantly glazed by Hasan Piker, where immigration (let alone citizenship) is nearly impossible to obtain for non-Chinese Frankly right-wing and left-wing are meaningless terms. You could get away with being far-right as long as you have leftist aesthetics If anything, all politics is downstream from whether you’re pro-West or anti-West. Everything else is just meaningless filler."
Left wingers just hate the West

Foreigner standing over female surfer sparks criticism - "A foreign man standing over a lone female surfer on a secluded Australian beach and wanting to sit next to her has sparked criticism of mass immigration. A woman who was passing by took a photo of the man, who is of Indian subcontinental appearance, as he spoke to the local at on Queensland’s Sunshine Coast earlier this summer. The bikini-clad surfer also filmed the interaction but later deleted it after social media users accused her of being racist, even though she did not say anything about the man’s background and only asked why he wanted to sit next to her while the whole beach was empty. The photo was sent to the surfer and later shared on Instagram, where many Aussies said it was disgraceful that the woman had been abused and blamed for sharing her experiences, and said there was a growing problem with recently arrived immigrants not understanding Australian beach culture... “Last summer I was sunbaking at Lorne Beach next to my family in a one-piece bathing suit, my straps were down but I wasn’t bare-chested and a north African elder man with other males walked right by me and stood next to me starring long enough for me to realise I was now suddenly laying in shade!” said another. “They made me feel like I was laying bare-chested. Really low-level uncivilised type of behaviour.” “It’s the beach, we’re red-blooded males. Window shopping is one thing. But you don’t stand over a woman or even stare and make her uncomfortable,” one man wrote."
auspill on X - "Crazy timing
> be Australian girl
> decide to go to surfing
> weather is amazing
> beach is completely empty
> perfect_day.jpeg
> finish your surf
> come ashore
> lie face down to tan
> lose track of time
> eventually look up to check phone
> some notifications
> wait what
> what is that
> spot a figure in the corner of your eye
> turn to see some Indian guy standing over you
> he’s in denim pants, dress shirt, shoes
> just staring at you
> no towel, no surfboard, nothing
> hope he’ll eventually leave, just go back on your phone
> he doesn’t move
> he keeps staring
> you start recording him
> hope a camera will make him back off
> he starts to sit next to you
> ask out loud why, of all the empty beach, he has to sit next to you
> get home and post the short video
> no slurs, no racial commentary
> video gets traction
> turns out a passerby woman saw the interaction and was disturbed
> they took a photo for your safety
> posted in community group
> they’re glad you’re safe
> start to think you did a good thing by sharing your video
> then the hate starts
> you’re accused of racism
> xenophobia
> paranoia
> bigotry
> “you’re overreacting”
> “this is why Australia is unwelcoming”
> replies keep coming
> it becomes too much
> delete your video
> want the whole thing to disappear
> start questioning if you overreacted
> two weeks later, February 2026
> you read a headline
> an Indian man was just found guilty of murdering a random Australian girl on another secluded Queensland beach
> it could’ve been you"

/pol/ - You know about 'Izzat', but are you familiar with the Indian concept of 'Jugaad'? - Politically Incorrect - 4chan - "You know about 'Izzat', but are you familiar with the Indian concept of 'Jugaad'?
'Jugaad' is the Indian term for "hacks to exploit the system" or the dishonest and deliberate bending of the rules and laws to one's favor. In India, such underhanded and self-serving behavior is celebrated, especially among the upper/middle classes. It can also mean "doing the bare minimum to get by" which is why Indian coding, craftsmanship, etc is so terrible. It often but not always is paired with the concept of 'dhandha', which Indians will often tell you is simply maintaining a small business or self-employment, but in reality refers to illicit practices and immoral occupations. Another concept to know is 'chori-chakari' which refers to repeated acts of petty thievery, such as taking food from food banks, which are acceptable within Indian culture."

Meme - सम्यक সম্যক @samyak128: "This is like the worst example of our Indian concept of "Jugaad" (dishonest conscious bending of the rules and laws to one's favor) coming up against institutions set up for only working with High Trust Societies. It honestly makes me ashamed to see this, because I can see this behavior in India as well, and it clearly doesn't change when large numbers of our people are transplanted into High Trust Societies. This is kind of thing that will slowly, but deeply create anti-India sentiment in these societies."
Cosmopolitan Reactionary @cosmorxn: "This is the queue for the University of Galway students’ union food pantry, where genuinely needy students can get some basics. The entire queue, as far as I can tell, is Indian. This erosion of social trust will eventually destroy the program."

Mohammed Hijab on X - "Muslim governments must choose either to unite and create a Muslim bloc or to remain slaves to the Epstein alliance. Russia and China are not coming to help."
Dan Burmawi on X - "I am sick of those “Western passport holders” whose loyalty is to the ummah, like Cenk Uygur, Bassem Youssef, Mehdi Hasan, Mohammed Hijab, and everyone like them. These people use “we” when talking about Americans or the British, while they have absolutely nothing to do with anything American or British. Their worldview is anti-West, their allegiance is to Islam, and they attach themselves parasitically to the useful idiots in the West to appear like normal Western dissidents, when in reality they are not."

Meme - Crying Brown Fat Woman: "PLEASE DON'T DEPORT ME TO A COUNTRY FILLED WITH PEOPLE LIKE ME. ANYTHING BUT THAT!"

robyn☦️ on X - "Tell her women are equal to men her entire life and then import millions of men from the third world who see her as inferior."

Meme - Severus Chud @SeverusChud: "Left winger logic is to blame White men for every societal ill whilst encouraging the importation of millions of strange foreign men who commit rape at massively higher per capita rates, then blame white men again."
Evie @EFCevie: "you do realise the uk is a patriarchal society right? so you're not wrong because white british men are the main perpetrators of sexual violence in this country but i have a feeling that's not what you were going for"

Meme - *Large group of migrants*
""Why am I poor?"
Price of labor (wages)
Quantity of labor (people)
IMMIGRATION *shifting the supply of labour far to the right*
Your paycheck (new market clearing point at a much lower wage)
Despite an increase in population, the demand curve doesnt shift much because third world living standards don't demand much; demand per capita decreases."

Gad Saad on X - "There are two battlefields: 1) the kinetic war against the West, which Islam cannot win; 2) the non-kinetic war against the West, which Islam is winning.
Islamic leaders, activists, politicians, and thinkers explained long ago that Islam will defeat the West in three ways:
1) by the womb of their women
2) via hijrah (migration), which the West is keen on helping via their orgiastic open borders policies
3) by using the West's miserable freedoms against us
They have screamed this repeatedly but we refuse to listen because of parasitic suicidal empathy."

China is in a fertility crisis worse than probably any country in the west by far, so why dont they accept millions of immigrants to compensate like the west does? : r/NoStupidQuestions

Paul on X - "🇮🇪🚨 This tactic of placing illegal migrants in Irish communities to establish "roots," then using that as a reason to block deportation, has been employed by the left, NGOs, and immigration lawyers for years. It does not work anymore. We need more deportations. Much more."

The Irish Political Analyst on X - "Ireland is now third only to Sweden and Germany in the EU in non-white population % aged 15-29. 10 years ago, we were in the bottom quartile in this metric. The post-Covid immigration wave in Ireland has probably been the fastest demographic change in international history in a country in peacetime."

Disclose.tv on X - "NEW - Ireland's President urges "global citizens" to acknowledge their "shared responsibility" to invoke St. Patrick’s spirit, by standing in solidarity with migrants and to recognise "the invaluable contributions" they make."
Christian Heiens 🏛 on X - "This is what end-stage liberalism looks like. Longhoused politicians lecturing the people they rule over that they have no home or identity of their own and must accept infinite immigrants from third-world nations that have nothing in common with their own country which no longer exists. This is what liberalism's "end of history" looks like. Only, history does not actually end. End-stage liberalism must necessarily give way to global South Africa or Rhodesia. Once you've fully dissolved the country and redefined the people to be "global citizens", what comes next is not fully automated luxury space communism but rather existential conflict. Because liberalism has already knocked out the load-bearing support structures of what was once a unified society, there's nothing left to hold the nation together aside from pure inertia that cannot sustain itself in the face of rival tribal groups who do not see each other as fellow "global citizens" but as hostile actors each seeking to take over the state to reward their own clan. Every attempt to bring all the peoples of the world together under one polity will inevitably produce the very existential political conflict that liberals dread."

Europa.com on X - "🇮🇪 Ireland's President makes migrant rights the focus of her St. Patrick's Day message: "The story of Patrick's life serves as a reminder of the resilience and courage of migrants, the invaluable contributions they have made to the countries they now call home." Follow: @europa"
Keith Woods on X - "This happens every year now -- diverse parades, focus on Irish emigration history, reframing Patrick's story as one of a "migrant" or "refugee." Even a national day to celebrate Irishness is now just another excuse for the state to promote mass immigration. It's all so tiresome."

Europa.com on X - "🇮🇪 Ireland's wealthiest resident has said the top priority for the Irish state should be to stamp out racism. In an interview with business lobby group IBEC, billionaire Denis O'Brien called on the business community to "stand up" to anti-immigration sentiment and celebrated racial diversity: “Unless we nip this in the bud it can be a very big problem for Ireland... look at the number of Indian CEOs in the tech bro community, all of them are investors in Ireland. If there is any shift in thinking that Ireland is a racist society it could be really, really serious and it’s something we need to stamp out immediately.” O'Brien has owned major or controlling shares in many major Irish and European media outlets, including Ireland's highest-circulation newspaper the Irish Independent, the UK's leading commercial news-talk radio brand LBC, and Ireland's most popular commercial radio station Today FM. Follow: @europa"
Keith Woods on X - "An actual material analysis by the left would show that business elites are universally the most pro-migration economic group, and the only native group to really benefit from mass-migration. Yet no matter how uniform their voice is in support of diversity, how much they promote anti-racist cosmopolitan values in their media, or how many migrants their parties import, the left will still insist on their pet conspiracy theory that the rich want us divided by race."
Left wingers are really easily manipulated. They want to spite billionaires - and they do it by pushing the billionaires' agenda