Meme - Tracey Wilson: "We don't hate the legacy media enough. One guy wins his leadership with 87.4% and it's spun as "survived". The other guys wins with 56% and it's spun as "easily won". They don't even try and hide their bias. This is what happens when they're funded by the government. sos"
"Pierre Poilievre has survived his Conservative leadership review with 87.4 per cent support. In the narrow arithmetic of party politics, it signals vindication. But politics, like literature, is not moved by numbers. The question is not what"
Rosemary Barton: "Avi Lewis wins easily on first ballot with 56% of the vote. He is the new leader of the NDP"
We're told that all the floor crossing shows that PP is an awful leader and should be removed. Weird how he got 87.4% support then.
Melissa π¨π¦ on X - "HOLY CRAP π¨π¦ State controlled CBC wouldn’t even let Travis Dhanraj discuss with or bring on Conservative voices This is a MASSIVE scandal End the tax payer funded CARNEY controlled CBC, now. Massive scandal"
If you think CBC media bias is a thing, you're a deluded far right Maple MAGA
Stephen Taylor on X - "Former CBC journalist Travis Dhanraj says CBC Power & Politics host David Cochrane said that Tamara Lich lives in a trailer and that's why she probably has multiple last names."
Marc Nixon on X - "DAMAGING EVIDENCE The explosive testimony by former CBC Reporter Travis Dhanraj confirmed David Cochrane hand picks political guests. Meaning when they CLAIMED Pierre Poilievre refused to appear on CBC David Cochrane did not give Pierre AIR TIME. CBC is complete TRASH. π️"
Juno News on X - "Travis Dhanraj, former host of Canada Tonight, faced roadblocks from CBC management, including restrictions on inviting conservatives. He raised concerns about balance and the Broadcasting Act, but his efforts to address the issue were ignored."
Rachael Thomas on X - "Canadians expect fairness from their public broadcaster. The CBC receives $1.5 billion in taxpayer funding, yet there are growing concerns that some Conservative voices are being excluded from its programming. A publicly funded broadcaster should reflect a diversity of perspectives and ensure Canadians hear a full range of viewpoints."
Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM on X - "Looking forward to hearing CBC’s commentary and coverage of the testimony from Travis Dhanraj. Just kidding! Of course they won’t cover it. It exposes their bias and failures. Instead, I’m sure they will rely on their usual tactics, silence, suppression, or smears, because what else could we expect from the national broadcaster for 1.5 billion of taxpayer money? Not credibility or unbiased journalism. That is certain!"
Aaron Pete on X - "This is WILD. We have a pretty middle of the road voice confirming what we’ve been speculating on X about for a while. Mainly that Rosemary and David completely control the coverage of politics on the CBC and the perspectives that get shared.
If it looks like it’s bias
If they talk like they’re bias
If people on the inside say they’re bias
If research suggests their bias
They are probably biased."
Former CBC host says he was silenced and bullied by senior leadership - "Former CBC journalist Travis Dhanraj told MPs Tuesday he was silenced, bullied and intimidated by senior leadership and hosts at the public broadcaster, which he says needs a “wake-up call.”... Dhanraj once hosted Canada Tonight with Travis Dhanraj, a nightly news show on CBC Television, until his departure that sparked a controversy over allegations of perceived bias in news coverage. In letters he made public at the time, Dhanraj accused the public broadcaster of “tokenism masquerading as diversity, problematic political coverage protocols, and the erosion of editorial independence.”... Dhanraj was one of 10 individuals from seven groups testifying to the committee Tuesday on the state of journalism and the media industry. He arrived at committee with one binder of documents featuring the CBC logo on the cover and another emblazoned with the word “receipts.”... He also criticized CBC for allegedly trying to get him to sign a non-disclosure agreement after he raised concerns about editorial independence. “It’s about systemic control, tokenism, selective enforcement, and a toxic culture where intimidation went unchecked,” said Dhanraj, who is of Caribbean heritage. “I think CBC needs to have, you know, a wake-up call here in terms of accountability,” he said. Many of Dhanraj’s issues came to a head after he wrote on social media that then-CBC president Catherine Tait had declined to appear on his show amid outrage over generous CBC executive bonuses at a time of attrition at the public broadcaster."
Naturally the trash Facebook page "Save the CBC" didn't mention any of this at all
Finally, proof CBC is biased against conservatives - "before the House of Commons standing committee on Canadian heritage on Tuesday, former CBC host Travis Dhanraj painted a stark picture of how the public broadcaster allegedly abuses its employees, discriminates based on race and systematically attempts to silence conservative voices... he idolized CBC News as a kid.. his April 2024 tweet, in which he publicly stated that his show, “Canada Tonight,” had requested an interview with then-CBC president Catherine Tait. “Shortly after I was removed from the air now on May 7, 2024, Tait told this very committee she was, quote, ‘not aware of any repercussions,’ yet, 24 hours earlier, ATIP records show, her vice-president, Barb Williams, briefed her directly about my situation. That matters, because trust matters,” said Dhanraj. But he said the “tweet was not the beginning, it was the breaking point.” According to him, months before this, “tensions had been building, not over performance, but over control.” He told the committee that, “While I was publicly held up as a bold, diverse host, my ability to lead the very program carrying my face and name was quietly being stripped away.” Dhanraj described how he had pushed for a nightly panel to showcase real diversity, including diversity of thought,” and questioned things like unequal pay, which seemed to be based on race. Worse, when trying to perform his job, he encountered numerous barriers, including interviews that were blocked due to internal guidelines over who could be guests. This wasn’t a one-off, he explained. It was the standard... Questioning Cochrane’s control over his guests led to Dhanraj being labelled as disruptive. Dhanraj told the committee that he has transcripts showing that CBC brass weren’t concerned about his journalism, but the reputational risk he posed to the broadcaster... he was silenced and intimidated by CBC “simply for trying to do my job and fulfill my public service role to Canadians.” It isn’t about one tweet, he told the committee, “It’s about systemic control, tokenism, selective enforcement and a toxic culture where intimidation went unchecked.” Dhanraj said that he fought for real diversity and equal standards,” but “within months, I was pulled off the air, disciplined, restricted from speaking, stripped of my primetime program and eventually out altogether.”... Dhanraj shared a series of statements sent to him from current and former CBC employees, who he said are afraid to speak out publicly... a current employee said that she has “witnessed and experienced multiple incidents of a misuse of taxpayer dollars, favouritism, nepotism, sexual harassment and verbal abuse.” The next statement, which Dhanraj said was from “someone you would all know if I said their name,” read, “Without exaggeration, I experienced toxicity every single day and it was almost always from the same people. It was not subtle. It was not hidden. It was part of the daily reality of working there.”... a former producer, alleged that Cochrane’s “toxic behaviour extended beyond editorial networks and was more often than not deeply hypocritical. While he publicly presented himself as a supporter of diversity, he actively undermined the contributions of colleagues who were minorities.” The final statement was from a former anchor in Vancouver who claims she was fired because of the colour of her skin. “As a white person, I did not fit the diversity targets they were trying to meet. No concerns about my performance had ever been raised”... there are more examples and that these individuals are traumatized and afraid to speak out due to possible professional repercussions. Dhanraj then describes his attempt to create a panel that represented diversity of thought but ended up being cancelled. He explained that he was given a list of 43-45 people who he was told were blacklisted. He described how ridiculous it was that he couldn’t call a Queen’s Park reporter for a story because that person was on the list. Instead, he said there were “continued hurdles and roadblocks set up to really have a certain group of folks in Ottawa in control of who was allowed on programs.” Dhanraj said he was told at one point, “Maybe you can have NDP folks on, but Conservatives are a no.” Asked about CBC’s policies towards Conservatives, Dhanraj read an instant message conversation he had with his senior producer. “Can we get a conservative perspective on this?” he asked. His producer responded: “It is a no to the Conservatives I’m told. We can’t chase anyone from the entire party. The chase is with PnP. So, if PnP is not able to secure … a Conservative, then we are not allowed to.” He said he was not even allowed to pick up the phone and call Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, and that after he had Deputy Conservative Leader Melissa Lantsman on, management threatened to take him off the air. “If management is not going to do anything. If the president of the CBC is going to come here and expect a tongue lashing and then be able to go back to the CBC and continue to get funding without accountability, these practices will continue,” said Dhanraj. “Shame is clearly not enough to get the CBC to get the place where they will hold themselves accountable, so it is incumbent upon this committee to do that.” Before the testimony, Dhanraj asked his former boss, Brodie Fenlon, editor-in-chief of CBC News, to air the testimony live, in order to prove that the taxpayer-funded broadcaster believes in transparency. CBC told the Toronto Star that it would not be airing the hearing. That didn’t matter, because Dhanraj’s own venture, Can’t be Censored, live-streamed the testimony. His colleague, Karman Wong, also held a pre- and post-show discussion with several guests, including Toronto Sun columnist Brian Lilley and lawyer Kathryn Marshall"
Travis Dhanraj's CBC testimony met with Liberal silence - "Dhanraj’s testimony on what goes on inside of Canada’s state broadcaster should have been of interest to the government, but Liberal MPs didn’t ask a single question of him or about what seems to be their favourite broadcaster... Dhanraj has worked across the Canadian television media landscape for the last 25 years, including several stints at CBC. In 2021, the network recruited Dhanraj to become their senior parliamentary reporter and named him host of Canada Tonight with Travis Dhanraj in 2023. “Travis’s engaging curiosity and incredible range of experience allows him to translate complex stories into personal terms and help audiences make sense of the news,” said CBC executive Andree Lau when they announced the new show. While the show had Dhanraj’s name in the title and his face was part of all of the publicity, he said he quickly found out that he wasn’t in control of who he could talk to. “Power and Politics, hosted by David Cochrane, was given gatekeeping authority over which politicians could appear on Canada Tonight,” he said... Dhanraj said he also faced pressure over his “intersection panel” that brought guests with diverse viewpoints together for debate. He held up a page with the images of everyone who had appeared on the panel and said you wouldn’t find this elsewhere. “We’ve got here one with Raheem Mohammed and Rachel Gilmore. I don’t know if you can get two people very far apart on the ideological spectrum as that. Sheila Copps, Brian Lilley and Faye Johnston, right? We were having the Canadian conversation and this panel was cancelled,” he said. Highlights of Travis Dhanraj's testimony before a House of Commons committee... While Conservatives asked questions, Liberals ignored Dhanraj and focused on other witnesses less hostile to the Mark Carney government’s favourite broadcaster. The Liberals, first under Justin Trudeau and now under Carney, have consistently increased CBC’s funding. In last December’s budget, CBC saw a funding increase of $150 million despite the government saying it was time to rein in spending. CBC’s total budget has grown under the Liberals to over $1.4 billion and CBC News has seemingly shown its gratitude for the extra money with increasingly favourable and partisan coverage. As Dhanraj pointed out, CBC should be for all Canadians and it should be a unifying force, but instead it has become a highly polarizing institution in Canada. “I don’t have to be wanting to destroy the CBC because management and executives are doing a great job of that on their own,” Dhanraj told the committee."
Clearly, the CBC is neutral and has no conflict of interest
Mocha Bezirgan π¨π¦ on X - "EXPLOSIVE: Some families of victims in the Humboldt Broncos tragedy say the CBC has been censoring, misrepresenting, and selectively editing their interviews. “We don’t trust the mainstream media anymore,” former NHL player Chris Joseph (@cjoseph23 ) says. Joseph alleges that the CBC selectively edited their interviews, including those of other families, in ways that suppressed their true views and favored Jaskirat Singh Sidhu, who is fighting deportation to India after running a stop sign and crashing into the team bus, killing 16 people, including Joseph’s son. “Karen Pauls twisted the narrative, and a lot of media has been like that,” Joseph alleges, addressing her recent coverage of convicted criminal Sidhu about his fight against deportation."
David Knight Legg on X - "Canada’s state owned CBC just ran an American Islamo-leftist C-lister Hasan Piker (online ‘HasanAbi ‘)….. on ‘Alberta independence’ Hasan knows zero about Alberta. But here he is on Ukraine and Oct 7 rape:
Ukraine/Crimea: “What do you call Crimea?" Piker asked in one show. "I call it a part of Russian territory, bitch. I call it Crimea River, a Russian river. The annexation of Crimea was absolutely a justifiable annexation."
Oct 7 Rape: “It doesn’t matter if f**ing rapes happened on Oct. 7. That doesn’t change the dynamic for me even this much,” adding that “the Palestinian resistance is not perfect” and lacks “magical bullets” mocking Jewish women as having “rape fantasies” or “rape hallucinations.”
Why is this sick clown being platformed by CBC? Want to know why so many of us - including the ones like me arguing for more independence within federation - are tired of the decline of Canada even if they’re not separatist, this interview is why. We have to pay for this CBC schlock. It reflects the eastern state-beta cultural insecurity, needy reliance on American leftist culture, the core institutional decay, the open contempt for taxpayers, and the lack of basic professional production standards. It’s so tiresome. It’s like they’re taunting people to separate. The CBC really couldn’t find anyone better than this hate filled American man-child to talk about Alberta? Here’s a new pitch for the Feds: Defund the CBC. They’re making everyone want independence."
Thread by @WiretapMediaCa on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "CBC's tracking fascist fight club: A poorly crafted government propaganda investigation, with clever editing, great audio, and sound bites without context. π§΅Debunk Thread:
1. The CBC depicted the (SS) Second Sons as a shadowy organization operating in secrecy; however, the organization's website can be found with a simple Google search that contains a clear mission statement.
2. CBC conflates their white supremacy "secret society" narrative because, like most NGO's, SS protects membership identity - and for good reason. The Canadian Anti-Hate Network (CAHN) claimed that associated members were part of an extremist militia organization that wasn't verified by Canadian intelligence, and they used the CBC to conflate their message.
3. CBC, Rachel Gilmore, Evan Balgord, Bernie Farber, and every other communist continue to call Diagolon a Violent Extremist Militia Group by using early RCMP assessments, but fail to acknowledge the RCMP's final conclusion.
4. The RCMP recognizes Bernie Farber as an agent provocateur, who inflates the truth, alters public perception and manipulates Canadian law enforcement.
5. Like the CBC, the Canadian Anti-Hate Network claims to be independent from the Government, but both organizations receive funding from the Government, and while the CBC claims to be non-biased, the Canadian Anti-Hate Network, where CBC gets most of their evidence from is an admittedly biased organization.
6. Evan Balgord claims there are MILLIONS of white supremacists lurking in Canada; however, CBC and their counterparts continue to target the same individuals who have moved the needle on controversial topics, exposing conspiracies as truths. Most notably, the foreign interference scandal, but now that they are unapologetically covering the government's mass immigration policies, they have become targets of another hyperbolic smear campaign by the same players.
7. Finally, Government-affiliated organizations and failed journalists turned influencers continue to propagate a fear campaign that Canadians are facing a white supremacist terror movement, but the only organization that meets CSIS's assessment that constitutes a terrorist organization is the Government itself."
Former CBC insider trashes its one-sided, 'thoughtless cheerleading' - "The CBC is at a watershed moment, observes longtime CBC insider David Cayley. The previous era of Canada’s publicly funded broadcaster has exhausted itself, Cayley concludes, and in the new era that’s unfolding, what the country desperately needs and deserves is a dialogue, not a monologue. “Everything ends in time,” he observes, “and I believe that (CBC’s) properties, its idea that it would belong to the audience, that it would stake its legitimacy on the audience, has brought it to a place where it has only one preferred audience — and can’t address the rest of the country, and can’t get outside or above or beyond the assumptions it shares with that audience — so it’s become a kind of boutique.” Between 1971 and 2012, Cayley worked as a producer, documentary-maker and program host at CBC Radio. Much of his career was spent at Ideas, a program that explained current affairs to Canadians and introduced people across the country to a range of themes and thinkers. More recently, he authored The CBC: How Canada’s Public Broadcaster Lost Its Voice (and How to Get it Back), a book published this year by publisher Kenneth Whyte’s Sutherland House. It arrives at a moment of particular resonance: The CBC’s British equivalent, the BBC, is embroiled in a bias scandal that cost it two top executives and faces the real risk of a fall from grace... “I’ll be 80 in March,” he tells me. “You know, I can’t really be cancelled. I’m so old,” he laughs, infectiously. What motivates a man in his 80th year to publish — not just a historical expose of the CBC, but a call to action? “Well,” he smiles, “T.S. Eliot said old men ought to be explorers. I like that … I have nothing to fear, really.”... when Prime Minister Mark Carney talks about the public broadcaster, he often says “the CBC exists to combat misinformation.” But what exactly does Carney mean by “misinformation,” David asks. Is it fact-checking — pointing out untrue things being said — or is it “misinformation” when someone says something another person believes to be wrong? David’s book is full of case studies in Canada — situations that became minefields — because the CBC chose to disregard the perspectives of others who think differently and jumped to a “finished view” of an issue. “A finished view,” he asserts, “is an ideology.” During the COVID-19 pandemic, David explains, so much unsubstantiated stuff was put into people’s heads as science, when it couldn’t possibly be science. “What the public interest demanded at the beginning of the pandemic,” David writes in his book, “was careful deliberation. What the CBC delivered was thoughtless cheerleading.” The pandemic, he reports, provoked extensive and deep-rooted scientific disagreement, but news of this disagreement never reached the public. What the opponents of quarantines and vaccine mandates were spreading was characterized as “misinformation,” David explains, but governments were allowed to change their message, again and again. For example, he reports, “the shot was localized in your arm; the ingredients will not spread throughout the body.” Whoops. That proved not to be true. “The virus was definitely of natural origin and only a dangerous wingnut could believe it may have been manufactured in a lab, right? Whoops! Now the CIA believes that.” “So there was a constant change in what the story was, right?” he posits. “Well, that wasn’t misinformation, was it?” David describes the freedom convoy that descended on Ottawa — in response to the quarantines and vaccine mandates — as an emerging public that the CBC didn’t want to hear... Another example, David cites, is NDP MP Leah Gazan’s private member’s bill proposing to outlaw residential school denialism in Canada. “We have a bill in Parliament right now,” David laments, “outlawing a perfectly reasonable view of residential schools.” And, he adds, we have a disgraceful situation in Quesnel B.C., “where the mayor was attacked by his council because his wife read and distributed a book that nobody has read, but if anybody did read it, it would simply be an alternative narrative of residential schooling.” Article content “I don’t think you can have history unless you are allowed to have competing views of history, and not a compulsory narrative,” David asserts. “So if our history is composed entirely of compulsory narratives, and the CBC is full of these compulsory narratives, these orthodoxies that cannot be questioned, then we have effectively no history. It’s too dangerous.” Article content David’s recommendation? “The CBC needs people who are sufficiently engaged — intellectually, spiritually, culturally — that they can face these questions. That don’t just turtle.”... there needs to be a place — withdrawn from immediate political urgencies — where we can think, because thinking is so hard to do. The CBC could offer up that place, David dares to suggest; a public broadcaster could provide space to accommodate currently antagonistic standpoints. To do so, David implores, CBC must recognize it has become a monoculture that actively excludes competing points of view and depresses intellectual inquiry."
We're still told that we were never told that the science was settled on covid.
Karla Treadway | Host Sovereign Sphere Podcast on X - "Wow what a piece of garbage the @CBCNews zero self reflection. Putting fear mongering narratives on Trump instead of asking - what keeps driving the political left to extreme acts of violence?"
Tristin Hopper on X - "I used to naively think it was just obtuseness. Now I know it's because of producers and writers behind the scenes who endorse the violence, want more of it and are willing to provide it cover."
On the Charlie Kirk assassination
The shocking story of a routine CBC hit-piece gone HORRIBLY WRONG - "Meet Jordan Tucker, a former CBC reporter. This is her own profile picture – note the pride progress CBC logo. It’s too perfect. Last Spring, Tucker attempted to do what CBC does everyday: push a woke activist agenda and pretend it’s real journalism. Tucker interviewed Professor Frances Widdowson on April 1, 2024 for a hit piece. But what she didn’t expect is that Professor Widdowson RECORDED the conversation and posted it in its entirety on her Youtube in July 2025... I helped publish a book called Grave Error. It’s a collection of essays written by top university professors and journalists setting the historical record straight on Indian Residential Schools (IRS). The schools had their problems, no doubt. But the hysteria & accusations – that teachers & nuns were murdering children, secretly burying them in mass graves, committing genocide – is completely, patently false. Grave Error addresses the media deception surrounding the May 2021 unverified claim that 215 unmarked graves were discovered in Kamloops, B.C., and the moral panic that followed. It’s a sober analysis of the facts. Grave Error was edited by Dr. C.P. Champion & Dr. Tom Flanagan. It quickly became a Canadian best-seller, selling tens of thousands of copies despite being completely ignored by the legacy media. Libraries across the country had months-long waiting lists to read it. The TRUTH was finally getting out there. But not everyone was happy about it. Woke activists labeled the book “hate literature” & “Residential School denialism.” The NDP then introduced a bill to make “denialism” a crime in Canada. In an interview, MP Leah Gazan specifically cited Grave Error and its authors as an example of so-called denialism. To recap: the media perpetuated at best massive deception and at worst a total hoax about unmarked graves at residential schools. Canadians now have to repeat the lie that we committed "genocide" and if we refuse, it's a hate crime. Mao would be jealous of 2025 Canada. In Maoist fashion, the city council in Quesnel, B.C. denounced Grave Error and censured the mayor – get this – because his wife read the book! The mayor was banned from visiting local Reserves. (This is how the CBC covered it at the time) Against this backdrop, Grave Error author Frances Widdowson was invited into the hornets nest to speak to Quesnel council. CBC assigned Jordan Tucker to interview her for a segment. But as we all know, the CBC doesn’t do journalism. It is an unabashed propaganda machine.
Tucker personifies everything wrong with the woke left and with the modern CBC. The tape shows a whiney, thin-skinned, lazy and incompetent journalist who cannot hold a conversation, let alone conduct an interview or engage in thoughtful debate. She is intellectually out-matched and woefully unprepared. Even after it becomes very evident that Professor Widdowson is calm, collected, rational and right, Jordan Tucker continues to act self-righteous, indignant to any pushback and under the belief she is morally superior. She obviously didn't think the full interview would ever see the light of day...
So let’s go through it. Jordan Tucker implies and then insists that Frances is being paid or somehow profiting off her City Council appearance in Quesnel. She has zero evidence, so it’s a pure fishing expedition, which Frances easily dismisses. Next, without a hint of irony, she asks Frances why people would exaggerate claims of abuse at IRS. The answer is obvious. Money. Kamloops has received at least $7 million since they made these accusations. Widdowson says that the feds have spent a quarter of a billion dollars on related initiatives since the May 2021 announcement of unmarked graves. Caught flat-footed, Tucker responds defiantly: “There's a lot of other ways to get $7 million.” In one breath CBC accuses Frances of profiting – what, by making a few bucks per book sold? – and in the next breath, they dismiss the idea that a Band could be financially motivated by $7 million, all while taking $1.6B from Canadian taxpayers. The levels of hypocrisy are truly impressive. Next, Jordan Tucker makes an absurd claim that 6,000 bodies have been found at IRS. Pardon? Perhaps that's how many alleged soil disturbances have been picked up using Ground Penetrating Radar. But those are unproved allegations. The truth is that zero, yes ZERO bodies have been found... A journalist should know the difference between an allegation and real a crime. But, at the CBC, they don't. Recall that CBC's chief political correspondent Rosemary Barton made the EXACT same embarrassing mistake on live television during the Federal Leader's debate. The state broadcaster even issued a rare correction. It's also odd that Tucker cited the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Report as her source, since that report came out in 2015 – a good SIX YEARS before the 215 unmarked graves story in Kamloops. Also, the TRC report claims 3,200 children died in IRS from 1867 to 2000. The CBC's incompetency knows no bounds. Here is where things get really good. Frances Widdowson, clearly exasperated by Jordan Tucker's ignorance and arrogance, tells her the truth. “You are a seriously incompetent journalist” 100% That's when Jordan Tucker basically bursts into tears and ends the interview...
if you're curious, THIS is how the same interview was presented to CBC's listening audience. This is not journalism. It’s pure deception and hard woke activism. This is exactly why we MUST REPLACE the CBC. They are a corrosive institution that peddle harmful lies and are tearing our country apart."
Peter Menzies on X - "So, within two weeks of a budget giving the CBC $150 million and diddly to anyone else, Bell cuts 40 journos on top of the 87 TVA cut. Pretty soon, CBC will be all that’s left."
Ezra Levant ππ on X - "Very soon there will be only two kinds of journalists in Canada: Those paid by the government. And those banned by the government."
Jasmin Laine on X - "In 2 minutes, CBC insults Pierre Poilievre, mocks him, defends Carney’s cabinet picks and reminds us how unbiased they are. Weasels… but they did just get a big payday from the Liberals, so get ready for even more of this!"
