Yossi BenYakar on X - "Douglas Murray obliterates the lie. Gaza isn’t “occupied” or “sealed.” It has two borders: Israel and Egypt. If you point to one and ignore the other, you’re not misinformed, you’re spreading propaganda."
Canary Mission on X - "Last week in Flatiron, protesters at a Within Our Lifetime rally targeted a Jewish-owned restaurant, screaming “you f**ing pedophiles,” calling diners “the Epstein class,” and verbally harassing one of the women at the restaurant. Watch."
Clearly, the diners and staff were all Zionists, so there's nothing wrong or anti-Semitic here
Meme - Michael Dickson @michaeldickson: "Today I learned that:
1. @MehdiHasan follows @StandWithUs.
2. He doesn't know the second word of the Shema. It's "Israel". You know, where Jews come from.
Mehdi Hasan @mehdirhasan: "I think we should have more Jewish actors on TV playing Jewish characters open about their awesome Jewish faith. I love the Shema and have had it memorized since I was a child. Not sure why Israel has to play a role in any of this. Let's not conflate Israel with Judaism please."
StandWithUs @StandWithUs: "As HBO's acclaimed medical drama "The Pitt" concludes its second season, star and creator Noah Wyle is opening up about portraying his first Jewish character - and how the October 2023 Hamas massacre transformed what the role means to him. Wyle, 54, plays Dr. Michael "Robby" Robinavitch in the series, a character whose Jewish background became "something significant" after the pogrom, he told Jewish Chronicle. "All of this was before October 7th. After the pogrom, it became something significant in the character," Wyle explained. "We wanted Robby to be distant from his faith and in need of connection to it." The character's name honors Wyle's own family - his great- grandmother's father was named Robinavitch, and the other side of the family was Rabinsky. Dr. Robinavitch wears a Star of David around his neck and, in a pivotal scene, clutches it while reciting the Shema Israel for comfort."
Eyal Yakoby on X - "Last week, Gazan women testified to a system of rape by Hamas to Palestinian women living in tents. This week, Gazan children testified to being raped by Hamas clerics. Not a word about it the New York Times, UN, or Cenk Uygur. Weird."
Elizabeth Diamond on X - "Great post. You know who else is silent? The Pope. The Vatican is ready to condemn Israel or the U.S., but it's silent when Muslims are the perpetrators of mu*der, r*pe, etc."
The "humanity" squad, the "anti pedo" crowd and those upset about supposed Israeli rape dogs don't care
Melissa Steinberg Brodsky | Facebook - "In April 1948, the Arab leadership of Haifa announced they wanted to evacuate the city. Not that they were being forced out. Not that they had no choice. They announced it as a decision. The Jewish mayor broke down in tears and begged them not to go. The British commander told them they were making a serious mistake. The Haganah’s chief officer promised full equality and peace to every Arab who stayed. The answer from the Arab Higher Committee in Beirut was evacuation anyway. This is one of the most documented moments of 1948. It is also one of the least told. Before any major military offensive in Haifa, between 25,000 and 30,000 Arabs had already left voluntarily. The fighting hadn’t reached most of their neighborhoods. What had happened was simpler and more damaging: the leadership had left first. British High Commissioner Sir Alan Cunningham documented it in an April 26 telegram, describing the abandonment by Arab municipal officials, military leaders, and the chief Arab magistrate as probably the greatest factor in the collapse of Arab morale in the city. When the people who are supposed to lead a community disappear, the community follows. On April 22, a meeting was held at city hall to discuss a truce. The terms guaranteed full safety and civil rights to any Arab who stayed. Shabtai Levy, the Jewish mayor, broke down and pleaded personally with the Arab delegates, calling evacuation a cruel crime against their own people. The British commander urged them to reconsider. The Haganah promised equality and peace to anyone who remained. The Arab Higher Committee in Beirut said go. What Arab leaders said publicly in the months that followed tells the rest of the story. The Economist reported in October 1948 that the departure was driven primarily by orders from the Higher Arab Executive, and that Arabs who stayed and accepted Jewish protection were being called renegades by their own leadership. Time magazine reported in May 1948 that the evacuation was partly driven by Arab leaders who hoped withdrawing Arab workers would paralyze the city economically. Emile Ghoury, secretary of the Palestinian Arab Higher Committee, told the Beirut Telegraph in September 1948 that the Arab states had agreed unanimously on the policy that created the refugees and must share in solving the problem. The Jordanian newspaper Falastin wrote in February 1949 that Arab states had encouraged Palestinians to leave temporarily to clear the way for the Arab invasion armies and then failed to help them return. Monsignor George Hakim, the Greek Catholic Bishop of Galilee, told the New York Herald Tribune in June 1949 that the Arabs of Haifa had fled despite the fact that Jewish authorities had guaranteed their safety and rights as citizens. These aren’t Israeli sources. These are Arab leaders and Arab newspapers, in their own words, from 1948 and 1949. The word Nakba was coined in August 1948 by a Syrian historian named Constantin Zureiq, a professor at the American University of Beirut. He used it to describe the catastrophic failure of seven Arab armies to defeat the newly declared State of Israel. In his own words, he wrote that seven Arab states declared war on Zionism in Palestine, stopped impotent before it, and then turned on their heels. He described Arab leaders whose declarations fell like bombs from their mouths but whose bombs were hollow and empty, causing no damage and killing no one. Zureiq made no mention of Palestinians as victims. He defined the Nakba as a self-inflicted Arab disaster, a failure of Arab leadership, Arab unity, and Arab will. That is what the word originally meant. A Syrian intellectual criticizing Arab governments for launching a war they were unprepared to win. Somewhere between 1948 and the 1980s, that meaning was inverted entirely. The word that began as Arab self-criticism became the centerpiece of a narrative in which Arabs were passive victims and Israel was the aggressor. The governments whose failure Zureiq had condemned became the loudest champions of the Nakba as a tool of international pressure. The people whose leaders had ordered them to evacuate Haifa, rejected the repatriation offer at Lausanne in 1949, and kept them in camps for generations became the symbol of Israeli wrongdoing. Azzam Pasha, Secretary-General of the Arab League, had explained the underlying logic in 1948. The absence of women and children from Palestine, he said, would free the men for fighting. The civilian population was a military calculation. When the war went badly and the evacuation became a flood, the same governments that had tried to keep Palestinians on the battlefield as soldiers refused to absorb them as refugees. They were useful in one context and inconvenient in the other. The British telegrams still exist. The Arab newspaper accounts still exist. The statements from Arab leaders still exist. Constantin Zureiq’s original definition of the word Nakba still exists. They’ve just stopped being part of the story that gets told."
Meme - Michael Dickson @michaeldickson: "Today I learned that:
1. @MehdiHasan follows @StandWithUs.
2. He doesn't know the second word of the Shema. It's "Israel". You know, where Jews come from.
@mehdirhasan I think we should have more Jewish actors on TV playing Jewish characters open about their awesome Jewish faith. I love the Shema and have had it memorized since I was a child. Not sure why Israel has to play a role in any of this. Let's not conflate Israel with Judaism please. Stand Jou @StandWithUs As HBO's acclaimed medical drama "The Pitt" concludes its second season, star and creator Noah Wyle is opening up about portraying his first Jewish character - and how the October 2023 Hamas massacre transformed what the role means to him. Wyle, 54, plays Dr. Michael "Robby" Robinavitch in the series, a character whose Jewish background became "something significant" after the pogrom, he told Jewish Chronicle. "All of this was before October After the pogrom, it became something significant in the character,' Wyle explained. "We wanted Robby to be distant from his faith and in need of connection to it." The character's name honors Wyle's own family - his great- grandmother's father was named Robinavitch, and the other side of the family was Rabinsky. Dr. Robinavitch wears a Star of David around his neck and, in a pivotal scene, clutches it while reciting the Shema Israel for comfort. - iFunny
Meme - Max 📟 @MaxNordau: "Drop Site contributor Abubaker Abed with an explicit call to murder every single Israeli Jew on the planet. Great hire, Ryan Grim."
"Wiping out Israel off the planet is not enough revenge. Israelis mustn't feel safe anymore. Haunt them and go after them where they go. These terrorist parasites must be removed from our planet."
Clearly, since he wants to murder Israelis and not Jews, there's nothing wrong here
Haaretz Sees Rising Exposure in Israel Despite Targeting by Netanyahu Gov't, Survey Shows - Israel News - Haaretz.com - "The weekend edition of Haaretz increased its exposure from 5.7 percent in 2023 to 7.3 percent... Haaretz remains behind larger outlets like the free daily Israel Hayom, which leads the market with a 26.6 percent reach, and Yedioth Ahronoth, which dropped sharply from 21.8 percent to 17.9 percent."
Haaretz faces blowback after liberal Israeli paper's publisher chides Israel for battling ‘Palestinian freedom fighters’ - "The publisher of Haaretz, Israel’s most influential left-leaning publication, sent shockwaves through his newspaper and beyond after saying Israel fought “Palestinian freedom fighters” and calling for sanctions against Israel."
Terrorist supporters keep citing Haaretz reporting as if it's some very big thing, or that the fact that it's Israeli means what it says must be 100% true (instead of just pushing the left wing agenda)
What Do Palestinians Think a Palestinian State Should Look Like? - "There’s a lively debate on social media today over whether Israel could have avoided much international opprobrium had it simply continued to offer statehood to the Palestinians even after current and past Palestinian leadership rejected such offers... even if we did, and even if Israel reiterated its suggested endgames, what would that accomplish? We know what end-game maps the Israelis have, in the past, offered or accepted as final-status agreements... We have, then, lots of proof that over the years, Israel would have accepted the two-state solution. What we don’t have is any proof that the Palestinian leadership would accept a two-state solution. So here’s a radical idea: The Palestinian leadership should be asked to rectify this. Make an offer. Produce an acceptable map. It would be even better if the Palestinians were to announce that they were ready to end the conflict so long as specific and enumerated conditions were met. As of now, we don’t know if the Palestinians would be willing to end the conflict, even if they stopped turning down statehood. The two are related: The Palestinian leadership most likely has never considered accepting a two-state proposal precisely because they would be expected to see it as a resolution to the conflict. Israelis understand this, and it accounts for some of the hesitation they have shown to continue offering the Palestinians a state: They want an end to the conflict and the Palestinians are unwilling to make such a promise. October 7 made this clear not only to Israelis but to the world. Too much of the Palestinian public seemed most divided not on whether October 7 was good or bad but whether it was good or a hoax. The response from the “pro-Palestinian” industry globally was to support Hamas or, at the very least, only punish the Jewish state. To top it all off, the October 7 attacks were aimed at torpedoing negotiations seeking a broad Arab-Israeli peace that would include a path to a Palestinian state. One of the two Palestinian factions was successful in sabotaging those talks and thus sabotaging the path to statehood. Putting the onus on Israel, then, would only be understandable for someone born yesterday. Since no one born yesterday is on Twitter arguing over the Arab-Israeli conflict, there is a certain faux-naivete to this entire debate. The Palestinians could disrupt their own unbroken pattern of rejectionism if they wanted to. And so they should: Mahmoud Abbas should make a speech, tomorrow if possible, and say explicitly that the Palestinians are prepared to consider the conflict resolved if they attain statehood through negotiations with Israel. In the same speech, Abbas should do what Olmert did for him and hold up a map of the two-state solution based on past negotiations. If they really wanted to put Bibi on the spot, that would do it. The onus would then be on Israel to make a counteroffer—which is what Abbas would have done in 2007 were he negotiating in good faith. Israelis have meticulously detailed and outlined “end game” maps. The Palestinians should take a turn doing so. If, that is, such a map exists."
Too bad they know that left wingers and terrorism supporters support their task to destroy Israel - through attrition if nothing else
How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Feed the Jews to the Mob - "The leadership of the Democratic Party has decided to feed Israel to its left. This is no longer a matter of speculation or of reading tea leaves in polling data. Every plausible aspirant to the 2028 presidential nomination, Khanna, Van Hollen, Newsom, Pritzker, Booker, Gallego, Warnock, Emanuel, has moved, is moving, or is preparing to move toward some version of the anti-Israel position, whether by calling for an end to military aid, by denouncing AIPAC, by using the word genocide, or by maintaining the tactical silence that, in the current environment, functions as a form of the same concession... The establishment’s reasoning is basic strategic calculation: the left will not relent on Israel; a civil war inside the party over the Jewish state would destroy the coalition; therefore, the rational move is to concede this issue, preserve party unity, and proceed with the moderate agenda on everything else: affordability, climate, migration, AI, etc. Feed this one thing to the beast, and the beast will be satisfied. It is an intelligent calculation, a genius one, really, but it is also a catastrophic one, because it rests on a complete misapprehension of what is being conceded and to whom. The first error is the assumption that anti-Zionism is a position, a policy preference, a discrete item on a list of demands that can be granted in exchange for quiet on the remaining items. No, no, no. This is a major category error. Anti-Zionism is not a position. It is a worldview, and a worldview does not function the way individual policy preferences do. A policy preference can be traded: you give me this, I give you that, and we both go home. A worldview is the structure within which all positions are generated, the logic that determines which sentences can be spoken and which cannot, and when you concede the worldview, you have not bought peace on the other questions. You have conceded the very logic by which all the other questions will be decided. The second error is that the liberal establishment treats the decolonial left as though it were a moral movement; a coalition of idealists whose passion on this one subject must be accommodated because the passion is about something real and the moral claim has traction. This is the view from the outside, from the surface, and it is wrong. What is at work inside the American left on the Israel question is not, or not primarily, some moral awakening. It is an inter-elite ruthless competition for institutional position, and anti-Zionism is the instrument through which that war of position is being waged. Thus, what makes the establishment’s concession so ruinous, so foolish, and so unforgivable is that it misidentifies the recipient. The Democratic leadership believes it is making a concession to some moral constituency, but it is, in fact, making it to a rival power formation within the party’s own institutional base. This is surrender. When the establishment concedes [on] Israel, it does not purchase peace with idealists but ratifies the victory of a competing elite fraction whose interests and ambitions extend to every institution the party touches, and whose appetite will not be diminished by having been fed the Jews.”
M.A. Rothman on X - "“𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐓’𝐒 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐀𝐏𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐈𝐃. 𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐓’𝐒 𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐇𝐎𝐖 𝐂𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐓𝐑𝐈𝐄𝐒 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐊.”
A devastating takedown of the “Israel is an apartheid state” lie—explained so simply that even a college protester could understand it: “𝘈𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘥 𝘪𝘴 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘧𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘣𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘶𝘱𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘚𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘩 𝘈𝘧𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘰𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘬 𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘯𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘯’𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘥.” “𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰 𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴. 𝘌𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘤𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘻𝘦𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭, 𝘸𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘈𝘳𝘢𝘣, 𝘔𝘶𝘴𝘭𝘪𝘮, 𝘊𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘯, 𝘑𝘦𝘸, 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘵𝘦, 𝘣𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘬, 𝘣𝘳𝘰𝘸𝘯—𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴𝘯’𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴.” Then the key distinction: “𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭𝘪 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘗𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘺. 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘥. 𝘑𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘈𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘊𝘢𝘯𝘢𝘥𝘢 𝘰𝘳 𝘔𝘦𝘹𝘪𝘤𝘰. 𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬.” The facts back this up: 𝐀𝐫𝐚𝐛 𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐬𝐫𝐚𝐞𝐥 serve in the Knesset, on the Supreme Court, in the IDF, in universities, and in hospitals. Israel’s 𝟐𝟏% 𝐀𝐫𝐚𝐛 𝐩𝐨𝐩𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 has full voting rights, freedom of worship, and equal protection under law (Israel Central Bureau of Statistics). In actual apartheid South Africa, 𝟖𝟎% 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐩𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 was denied the vote, restricted to Bantustans, and barred from public facilities. Comparing Israel to that regime is not criticism—it’s blood libel. “𝘎𝘢𝘻𝘢 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘳𝘶𝘯 𝘣𝘺 𝘏𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘴. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘎𝘢𝘻𝘢. 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘞𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘉𝘢𝘯𝘬 𝘪𝘴 𝘳𝘶𝘯 𝘣𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘢𝘯 𝘈𝘶𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺. 𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭 𝘪𝘴 𝘳𝘶𝘯 𝘣𝘺 𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘴.” 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐈𝐬𝐫𝐚𝐞𝐥𝐢 𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐧 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭. 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐧𝐞. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 “𝐚𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐝” 𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐥𝐢𝐞—𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧."
David Wurmser on X - "💯 In fact, the peace movement was already reeling in the months before Rabin’s murder, and according to his closest aides, Rabin himself was pulling back from further implementation of the Oslo accords because the Palestinian side was reverting to terror and incitement. His assassination gave a lifeline to the movement by creating the myth that peace was at hand were it not but for his murder. That allowed the camp to cling to the illusion of the peace process’ viability. It also gave Labor a huge 20-30 percent swing in its flagging popularity until more violence kicked in from both Palestinians and Syria, leading to Netanyahu’s election. But eventually reality kicked in and Palestinian violence continued its relentlessness, therein convincing more and more Israelis of what they had started suspecting before Rabin’s murder: the Palestinians just don’t want peace; they want Israel’s destruction and will use every territorial concession as a launching pad to do so."
Haviv Rettig Gur on X - "They’re still coming at Yair to defend Hasan Piker’s bald-faced lie that Einstein hated Zionism. It’s really important to them for Einstein to have hated Zionism. Because most Jews turned Zionist in the 20th century (you’ll never guess why). So they have to pretend that half the history of 20th century Jews never happened, and they have to keep finding anti-Zionist Jews who never existed. Alas, Einstein was Zionist through and through. But it’s good that they kept coming. Because it gave Yair a chance to set the record straight."
Italy Says Hezbollah Staged UN Base Attack It Had Blamed On Israel - "Defence Minister Guido Crosetto had said in Brussels that Israeli forces staged the new attack on the UN base in the Lebanese town of Chamaa. But a defence ministry source said that Crosetto only "had partial information" when he spoke. "Hezbollah was responsible for the attack," the source told AFP."
From 2024. Israel needs to answer for its war crimes!
Meme - Alan MacLeod: "Fixed this headline for you, Daily Telegraph"
"
Jewish schoolchildren kicked off plane after 'singing Hebrew songs' <- 'Death to Arabs'
Spanish airline Vueling removes summer camp director and 50 children for 'compromising passenger safety'"
David Rosh Pina: "Oh cool @AlanRMacLeod was there in the airplane! Beyond jihadi apologist he also has the gift of omnipresence. What a guy!"
"IF YOU REPEAT A LIE OFTEN ENOUGH, IT BECOMES TRUTH PALESTINE"
Terrorism supporters just keep on lying, but that's no surprise since the whole Palestine story is a lie from the start
Karen Smith 🇺🇸🇮🇱 on X - "Stop asking me for money, @TheDemocrats. You’ve made it clear you don’t want Jews and my money is Jewy Jewish. Ask Hasan Piker, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ana Kasparian, and Cenk for money."
Robert Spencer on X - "Algeria shuts churches as Christians are forced underground. Pope Leo was just in Algeria, appealing for peace and tolerance. His appeal seems to have fallen upon deaf ears. Now, who could have predicted that?
Christian Daily International: "Nearly all Protestant churches in Algeria have been forced to close, pushing thousands of Christians into private homes and informal gatherings as authorities tighten control over non-Muslim worship.The closures, which have been systematic from 2017, are not isolated incidents but part of what a 2026 report by the European Centre for Law and Justice (ECLJ) describes as 'a restrictive legal and administrative system incompatible with international standards on freedom of religion.' The report documents what it calls a widening gap between Algeria’s constitutional guarantees and the lived reality of its Christian minority.""
Time to condemn Israel for hating Christians for not letting churches open when Iran is bombing the country
Sesame Street post honoring US Jews draws intense wave of antisemitic hate - "A Sesame Street social media post on Friday marking Jewish American Heritage Month drew a wave of hateful antisemitic comments, accusing the decades-old children’s show of spewing “Jewish supremacy” and “propaganda.”... “No one wants any more of this Jewish supremacy nonsense,” antisemitic influencer Dan Bilzerian wrote in response to the post. “Great, a whole month just for Jews …like we don’t hear about their victimhood every day of every other month,” another user posted. “Nope. We’re not celebrating genocidal Zionists, which many/most are,” another replied. “Propaganda. Getting into the minds of young impressionable children is brainwashing. Does anyone remember the Hitler Youth?” a user also commented."
Clearly, this is just anti-Zionism and Zionists need to stop trying to censor criticism of Israel
The Blogs: Why the Left is Antisemitic, and Why that Will Not Change - "If the Western left supported the Palestinians, they would encourage them to end terrorism, to recognize Israel as a Jewish state, to learn Jewish history, and to engage in peaceful dialog with Israel on how to resolve the conflict. This would immediately discredit the Israeli right that opposes the creation of a Palestinian state, and it would open wide the door to the creation of a sovereign, peaceful, and prosperous Palestinian state. The Palestinians need their so-called friends to encourage them to take these steps rather than to encourage them in the current self-destructive path of hating Israel and the Jews. Helping the Palestinians achieve peace and prosperity would, however, rob the Western left of a juicy and easy cause. To them, marching in the streets with a Palestinian flag or even a Hamas flag is far cooler than doing the hard work of peacemaking. Wearing a keffiyeh while drinking Starbucks coffee is the new version of champagne socialism. The left does not admit this hypocrisy any more than they admit that Israel deserves support far more than its enemies do. A recent poll found that among American Democrats under 50 years of age, a higher percentage have an unfavorable view of Israel (62%) than they do of China (43%) or even Iran (54%). It is hard to believe that any sane person thinks this way, and yet, the American left is probably less deluded on this issue than the left in the rest of the Western world... Former Ontario NDP (New Democratic Party, Canada’s left-wing party) leader and premier, Bob Rae, left the NDP in disgust in 2002. In his parting op-ed, he wrote, “Svend Robinson, the federal New Democrat spokesperson for foreign affairs, has gone to Ramallah to show solidarity with Yasser Arafat. In a recent interview, Mr. Robinson described Israel as a terrorist state and proudly declared that he had ‘taken sides.’ Mr. Robinson’s views are apparently now the official stand of the federal New Democratic Party. They are not mine”... Ryan Painter, a long-time activist and executive in the NDP is another example. In May 2024, he denounced antisemitism in the NDP and wrote that, “The NDP caucus fully embraced activist antisemitism in the wake of Hamas’ October 7th attacks”. He is now involved in the Conservative Party of Canada and the Conservative Party of British Columbia. When I mentioned to Ryan Painter that I was going to use him as an example in a blog on left-wing antisemitism, he asked me to quote his feelings on the subject. He said, “Antisemitism on the left isn’t a glitch. It’s what happens when an ideology divides the world into oppressors and oppressed, codes Jews as powerful, and then treats hostility toward them as a form of justice. We’ve seen it on Canadian campuses, in union locals, and in activist coalitions that would never tolerate this language about any other minority.” I am another example, although I left the NDP much earlier than Painter did, and he and I argued about it a few years ago... In 2015, I voted for the Conservative Party of Canada for the first time, and I told my friend. It was Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s last election, and unfortunately, he lost. My friend became very angry at me. I explained that the NDP had become antisemitic while Harper had steadfastly supported the Jewish community (among other things, Harper initiated the National Holocaust Monument and he was a strong voice for Israel on the world stage), but my pleading didn’t help. He was no longer interested in my friendship. He wasn’t the only friend that I lost in this way. Evidently, their left-wing ideology was more important to them than their friendship with me and more important than my concerns about antisemitism. Unfortunately, this is typical of left-wing ideologues and their attachment to a Palestinian “cause” that they neither understand nor care about, but that is important to their own egos. The left is shamelessly using both Israelis and Palestinians, and no decent liberal, who believes that fairness and peace are better values than envy and violence, can tolerate it. It is well past the time to leave the left and never look back."
