L'origine de Bert

Get email updates of new posts:        (Delivered by FeedBurner)

Friday, August 02, 2024

Links - 2nd August 2024 (2)

Meme - "The New York Times
It Turns Out the 'Deep State' Is Actually Kind of Awesome
Meet the unsung heroes making our country great."
"it doesn't exist -> it's a right wing conspiracy -> it is real and it's stunning and brave -> repeat"

Thread by @joni_askola on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "The fact that Julian Assange is alive and free underscores the stark contrast between the democratic west and the authoritarian regimes he supports. Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is an immensely controversial figure. He is regarded as a traitor to the West, working in the interests of our adversaries, possibly due to being driven by a profound antipathy towards the West. Following the resolution of his 12-year fight against extradition to the United States through a plea deal, he was released from a British prison and on Monday, he was journeying back to his home country of Australia. The release of Julian Assange was met with cheers from both adversaries of the west and western traitors, shedding light on the interests he aligns himself with. He is poised to admit guilt to an Espionage Act charge related to obtaining and disclosing nationally significant information, thus officially acknowledging his status as a traitor. While WikiLeaks may have initially served a positive role by uncovering corruption and military misconduct, its reputation took a turn in 2010 when it published a video from a US military helicopter depicting the killing of civilians in the Iraqi capital Baghdad. Assange released the leaks without redacting any names, exposing hundreds of dissidents in Afghanistan and Iraq to "serious harm, torture, and even death." Following the publication of the unredacted documents, some sources reportedly "disappeared." The release of the leaks endangered hundreds of Afghans who were fighting against the Taliban. In response, Assange remarked, "Well, they're informants," and went on to say, "So, if they get killed, they've got it coming to them. They deserve it."In 2010, it was reported that Assange's associate, Israel Shamir, purportedly provided a list of "organisers, instigators, and rioters, including foreign ones" to Lukashenko. In 2012, there were reports that RT would offer Assange his own talk show. Assange is an agent of russian disinformation. A genuine journalist would never host a talk show on RT. In the same year his show premiered, Assange chose not to publish a leak concerning a 2 billion euro transaction between Assad and a russian government bank. In the 2016 US presidential election, the release of hacked emails and documents from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and John Podesta, the chairman of the Clinton campaign, by WikiLeaks, favored the Trump campaign, consequently benefiting russia in return. In 2016, WikiLeaks obtained a substantial collection of documents related to the russian government, with over 50% of them never having been previously published. However, "Assange provided a series of excuses" for not releasing them.  In 2017, WikiLeaks sought to quiet its critics by releasing a "Spy Files russia" dump, which included details about the russian online surveillance system SORM. This system had been previously disclosed, and the leak did not reveal significant new information. When questioned about WikiLeaks' role as a whistleblower in russia, Assange remarked that russia already has Kremlin critics like Navalny and publications such as Novaya Gazeta. The question of whether Assange became a disinformation agent and traitor due to being an opportunistic pawn driven by his antipathy towards the West or if he was a legitimate operative for russia or another authoritarian regime remains unresolved. If we in the West behaved like his beloved russia, syria, or china, the current arrangement would not be taking place. He would not be free, or even alive. This is what sets us apart from them. The fact that all the adversaries of the West, including numerous traitors within the West, are exceedingly pleased to see him released speaks volumes about whom he was valuable to. It will be intriguing to observe Assange's future actions now that he is at liberty. It is quite possible that he will persist in his efforts against the West and in favor of authoritarian regimes. It is fortunate that we didn't turn him into a martyr."
When you just hate the West

Why 324 Front Street Barnum Iowa 50518 Is Trending After Hawk Tuah Video - "The trend basically comes from a Google Street View flasher post after a X user spotted a woman standing in a parking lot outside a bar and grill, allegedly flashing the google street view car in broad daylight."

Why is heat in the UK different? : r/AskUK - "Im on vacation in London and was outside basically all day today and I think I got heatstroke. I couldn’t keep my eyes open or see properly, couldn’t walk straight, and nearly fell down a flight of stairs. I’m Canadian but even in other countries I can cope with it better. Why is the heat here hotter even though it’s not as warm"
"The interesting thing is that people from really cold countries (Sweden, Canada) come here during winter and say that although it’s far, far colder where they come from, it feels much colder here because it’s so damp.  Basically, our weather’s shit."
"My boss is working from Bali ATM and on every call he looks like he's about to die from the humidity to such an extent I wonder if it's even enjoyable being there for any amount of time"

Why is heat in the UK different? : r/AskUK - "I spend a large part of my life in the Caribbean as I'm 50% Caribbean, I can tell you the heat in the UK is completely different. In the Caribbean, it rarely gets below 20 degrees, however there is a constant cool breeze coming from the sea which works as natural air conditioning. People on holidays are often caught by the heat, cause it seems alright however the sun is quite strong so you burn easily without noticing.  The UK isn't built for heat. Houses are built to trap the heat, cause most time of year it's freezing. My flat has great insulation which is amazing in the winter, but deadly in the summer. Once the heat gets in, it's hard to get it out. It's not even hot outside today (17 degrees is a very comfortable temp), but my flat is still 24 degrees from yesterday even with all windows open.  Also noticed the UK is quite humid. When it gets hot, the air is so thick and I get clammy. I have asthma so I really notice the difference. It just gets so unpleasantly hot.  Honestly, 25 degrees here is not the same as 25 degrees in the Caribbean"

What Could Have Caused Poland's Crooked Forest? - "n a small corner of western Poland, near the town of Gryfino, a strange and eerie woodland exists. This bizarre collection of curved trees, named the “Crooked Forest,” is shrouded in mystery and despite the numerous different theories that have been proposed over the years, no one truly knows what caused the trees to adopt this conformation.  The Crooked Forest consists of around 400 pine trees that grow with a 90-degree bend at their base, the vast majority of which are bent northward. Curiously, the Crooked Forest is enveloped by a larger forest of straight growing pine trees. It is estimated that the trees were planted in the 1930s and that they were around 7-10 years old when they experienced whatever force/damage that resulted in trunk curvature...   The final idea that has been thrown around that seems to have gained most acceptance is perhaps the most boring one (Occam’s razor and all that), which proposes that the curves are man-made. This would make sense given the fact that the trees are very consistent. The suggestion is that during the 1930s, local farmers planted and manipulated the trees for ultimate use as a construction material, for example for pieces of furniture or, more likely, ship building. An extract from a piece entitled Wooden Vessel Ship Construction even supports this idea...   The invasion of Poland during World War II would have likely interrupted this activity, preventing the farmers from being able to finish the job and thus leaving this peculiar forest that we still see today.  The local town was also devastated during the war and was not reestablished until the 1970s when a new power plant was built in the area. This would explain why none of the locals have the foggiest idea why the trees look like this."

MEVnet lets you monitor Malaysia's EV charging infrastructure
The network is better than I expected. Of course, uptime is another issue

Meme - "Getting a rejection email with multiple fried chicken related puns is a new low for me"
"KFC. Hi Eboni, Thank you for your application to Team KFC. We're cluckin' delighted you're keen to join our flock, however at this 'moment in time your skills aren't the secret recipe the Colonel is looking for. But we'd love to hear from you again give us a cluck if you would like to apply in the future. Best Wishes,
Team KFC Dublin - Westmoreland Street"

Why US Signs Look Different Than The Rest Of The World’s - YouTube
Even more reasons driving in the US sucks. Even if you are used to then, you need to read text instead of looking at pictures

🍃 on X - "Thinking about when the Jamiroquai guy said in an interview that he broke up with Winona Ryder because her boobs were too big and she wanted to have sex all the time. World historic fumble"

Meme - Mia @miakhalifa: "Stop thanking people for their military service and start asking how many civilians they k*lled"
Licensed Memes: The Banterbury Tales: "No, Mia. Even the most proficient soldiers don't have a body count as high as yours. Look elsewhere."
Meme - Hot Takes Nobody Asked For: "former *corn* actress mia k has received backlash after this statement. maybe she should ask how many people they helped while she was busy trolling online."

Onigiri Shaped By Sweaty Armpits Of Cute Girls Are A Hit In Japan - "There are now places selling onigiri prepared by young and attractive women. The catch? The snack is not shaped by their skillful hands but their armpits that have been, um, scented by their perspiration... These rice balls also don’t come cheap and have been retailing more than 10 times that of regular onigiri.  Onigiri in Japan typically sell for just 100 yen to 200 yen (S$0.90 to S$1.70) a ball.  According to reports, the onigiri is even said to be made onsite which allows would-be buyers to watch the process of the rice balls being shaped.  Back in 2016, a male Japanese reporter decided to try one made by his female colleague and gave an enthusiastic thumbs up.  “It’s so good! I didn’t know that it could be this good just because a beautiful woman made it,” he said before adding that he also wished to display his unfinished snack on an altar."

Double word score? New two-sided Scrabble is 'more inclusive' - "Brett Smitheram, the current UK number one at Scrabble and the 2016 World Scrabble Champion, said: “The game speaks to a trend in younger people who want to avoid competitive games and sense of losing, instead favouring teamwork and collaboration working towards a fun goal together.”  It comes as a growing number of younger players say they find the traditional game difficult, with three quarters of players aged 25 to 34 admitting they have searched a word online to check it exists. Almost half of Scrabble players also say they have tried to make up a new word to win a game, a poll of 2,000 adults by Markettiers for UK Scrabble found... It also showed the importance of board games in an age when people are glued to their phones, with more than half those polled saying they play board games to de-stress or to unplug from social media.  Some 65 per cent of board game players agreed that it helps them to switch off."

Why French chefs want us to eat this bird – head, bones, beak and all - "The customary way of eating ortolan, a delicate songbird, involves the diner covering his or her head with a large napkin. Tradition dictates that this is to shield – from God’s eyes – the shame of such a decadent and disgraceful act.  But if a clutch of leading French chefs have their way, the dish will soon be back on the menu, allowing gluttons to indulge in a meal that ranks as one of the most controversial of all time.  The four cooks, including Alain Ducasse, who has a dazzling 18 Michelin stars to his name, have called for a partial reversal of the ban on killing and selling ortolans. He told a French food magazine that the prohibition “undermines centuries of tradition, customs, and promotes a black market with exorbitant prices”.   A single ortolan bird is no bigger than a baby’s fist and weighs less than an ounce, but they can be sold for as much as £100 to those willing to break the law.  “This is a cry from the heart,” said Michel Guérard, one of the inventors of “nouvelle cuisine”, who wants to serve the dish for one day or one weekend of the year.  Killing and selling the bird, a member of the bunting family, has been banned in France since the late 1990s, though the ban was not strictly enforced until 2007... the rarity of the bird is not the only reason why killing it is so controversial. It is the method in which they are dispatched.  Hunters catch the birds using traps set in fields during their migratory season (when they fly to Africa). They are then kept in covered cages, encouraging them to gorge on grain in order to double their size. It is said that Roman Emperors stabbed out ortolans’ eyes in order to make the birds think it was night, making them eat even more.  They are then thrown alive into a vat of Armagnac, a trick that manages to both drown and marinade the animal at the same time. Killing two birds with one glug, as it were.  French chefs argue that “it’s not a bad way to die”. Indeed, it is probably no crueller than force-feeding a goose in order to fatten up its liver into foie gras, another dish that French gourmets refuse to give up despite mounting howls of horror around much of Europe.   Then comes the eating – part pagan ritual, part essay in gluttony. The birds are cooked for eight minutes and served with their heads still attached. After the shame-hiding napkin is placed over the diner’s head (helping, too, to trap the aroma of the dish), the ortolan is popped in its entirety into the diner’s mouth, who then proceeds to eat everything including the head and bones.  Those who have tasted ortolan rave about the hazelnut and gamey flavours...   There is some romanticism to the barbarous act – it appears in Proust and the title character devours one in Gigi. The American chef Anthony Bourdain says the experience is close to ecstasy: “With every bite, as the thin bones and layers of fat, meat, skin and organs compact in on themselves, there are sublime dribbles of varied and wondrous ancient flavours: figs, Armagnac, dark flesh slightly infused with the salty taste of my own blood as my mouth is pricked by the sharp bones.”   Ducasse and his fellow chefs point out that the songbird ban in France also prohibits the killing of woodcock, which is legal in Britain. This is true. The small, long-beaked bird can be found on the menu of St John restaurant in London, famous for pioneering “nose to tail” eating, where it is served with its head on, split down the middle. Traditionally, the most prized part of eating woodcock is scooping out the brain...   The most famous fan of the bird was President Mitterrand, who, just days before he died from prostate cancer, hosted an epic meal on New Year’s Eve in 1995.  It involved Mitterrand eating 30 Marennes oysters, foie gras and capon, washed down with Sauternes and local red wine, before moving on to not just one, but two ortolans.  The sheer gluttony of the old Socialist shocked many Frenchmen, even those who think us Brits sentimental animal lovers for turning up our noses at horse meat."
From 2014

Sargasso Sea - Wikipedia - "The Sargasso Sea (/sɑːrˈɡæsoʊ/) is a region of the Atlantic Ocean bounded by four currents forming an ocean gyre. Unlike all other regions called seas, it has no land boundaries. It is distinguished from other parts of the Atlantic Ocean by its characteristic brown Sargassum seaweed and often calm blue water"

Actual Fact Bot: Revived | Facebook - "During the Cold War, the Soviet Union used an automatic nuclear weapons system known as Dead Hand. It had the capability to initiate the launch of Russian ICBMs targeting various cities in the event of a detected nuclear attack through seismic, light, radioactivity, and pressure sensors along the country's borders, even without human oversight. Allegedly, the Dead Hand system remains in use by Russia."

Parliament: New ERP system 'not a threat to privacy' (2014) - "Data collected by a satellite-tracked electronic road-pricing (ERP) system Singapore is building will be "aggregated and anonymised", said Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew in response to questions about how privacy will be safeguarded.   In Parliament on Monday, Mr Zainal Sapari (Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC) and Non-Constituency MP Gerald Giam both raised oft-cited concerns regarding privacy, with the latter pointing out that the new ERP system is not subjected to clauses in the Data Protection Act."
Data from ERP, public transport cameras to be used in terror fight (2016) - "THE Home Team wants to expand its use of intelligence and investigation tools, and it will make better use of available data in Singapore to combat the growing threat of terrorism and serious crimes.  Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam made this point in Parliament on Wednesday during the debate on his ministry's spending plans for the new financial year.  He cited examples such as the Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) system and public transport video cameras, both of which contain important data that could be vital to Singapore's safety and security.  "We had initially taken the position that some of these data would not be used ... but with a changed security environment, it means we have to change our position," said Mr Shanmugam.  The Home Team had to be able to collect and analyse suspicious travel patterns, and respond in a swift and decisive manner "for our collective security".
Police Can Now Use On-Board GPS To Track Speeding; Implementation By Late 2024 (2024) - "The police’s unveiling of their vehicle forensics capability signifies a paradigm shift in traffic enforcement strategies.  With plans to fully implement this capability in 2024, authorities are poised to leverage onboard diagnostics (OBD) ports to extract telemetry data, including location, braking, and acceleration patterns."

Singaporeans aren't really Asian - at least not at work - "Singapore is not only not close to Confucian nations of East Asia — it’s their polar opposite.  Only 1 in 10 Singaporeans believe their career is influenced by the employer more than themselves, in stark contrast to an astonishing 68 percent in China, 63 percent in Japan and, also a big surprise, 51 percent in Hong Kong, which is often compared to Singapore.  Even in Malaysia, which has a close mutual history with the city-state, about twice as many people believe their future depends on their company, not their own efforts.  The only other Asian outlier is India, with which Singapore appears to have much more in common than other countries it is typically associated with.  But this is not all—it ranks among the nations of the Anglosphere, like Australia, New Zealand, and the UK itself. The United States of America, often hailed for its freedom-loving individualism, is only in the middle of the pack, with fewer people believing their future depends on them than their employers.  Is the American Dream dead?  Let’s move to another question: who should motivate the worker? And again, Singapore is an outlier, with just 5 percent of local respondents putting the responsibility on the employer.  In truth, most surveyed employees globally recognise that they should work on their motivation to do their jobs well — although, again, not in China or Japan, and only a small majority in Malaysia or Hong Kong, long seen as a beacon of commerce and one of the freest economies in the world.  Once more, Singapore is accompanied by India, New Zealand, Australia, and the UK, among others.  If that’s not enough, however, here’s a third one: who is responsible for work-life balance? This is a triple whammy. Once more Singapore is at the extreme end of the spectrum, with just 9 percent of local workers looking to their bosses for a better balance between their job and personal life, while China, Japan and Hong Kong are on the opposite end, expecting superiors to plan their lives for them.  Even bearing in mind that Singapore is not ethnically homogeneous, the differences are just too huge to be ignored. It outranks not only other Asian nations but Western ones as well.  It’s not about just a few percentage points here and there but the widest gulf in the entire survey.   What could explain such a huge difference? Are Singaporeans simply affected by their heritage as a former British harbour, having spent decades under foreign laws and customs, today finding themselves in the same intellectual category of self-responsible individuals as Australians, New Zealanders and the British themselves?  This seems plausible, looking at the proximity between all of the countries in the survey, until we consider the case of Hong Kong. The city had spent far longer under direct British management than Singapore and yet is clearly closer to the Chinese mainland than the Lion City.  It seems that the answer is more complex and might remain highly speculative forever.  It may be that Singaporeans had to embrace the self-resilience while being raised in a tiny state that could only count on itself surrounded by largely uncooperative, and occasionally hostile, neighbours.  Unlike Hong Kong, which had been merely a gateway for foreign business into China, independent Singapore was forced to open itself up to every willing foreign investor or merchant to find relevance and survive.  It’s a truly international hub whose success is entirely self-made.  This, coupled with the British heritage in law, education and language, could have made Singaporeans even more independent than the original founders of the 19th-century port.  Raised under the rigours of compulsory National Service, it wouldn’t be surprising that the mantra of having to do everything yourself — including dying for your country if necessary — is carried over to the workplace... as a recent PISA study for 15 year olds has shown. Singaporean teenagers took the first spot globally in a test of creative thinking"

Is S$100-200K enough to live comfortably in Singapore? — Canadian man who dreams of raising his family in SG asks - "“Very subjective,” said one. “Upper middle suggests a private flat (not public housing) plus a car. If two kids (in local school) I would say S$400,000. Our family lives in public housing. We spend about $180,000 a year – kids in local school, no tuition...   “British ex-PR here,” shared another. “$150k was not enough, and that was living in HDB. You’re going to need upwards of $200k.”"

Dear Hong Kong, Singapore is not your biggest rival | The Straits Times - "Intensifying competition from cities in Hong Kong’s immediate proximity – such as Shenzhen and Macau, among others, threatening to overshadow its traditional role as the lone star of southern China’s economy – is what Hong Kong should be most wary of... Hong Kong consumers – many once reluctant to even step foot on mainland China – now flock in droves to Shenzhen on weekends to dine, shop and even undergo dental treatment. They are enamoured with the city’s lower prices, more polite services, greater choices and longer opening hours compared with Hong Kong’s.   In 2023, Hong Kongers made 53 million trips to Shenzhen, while mainlanders made 26.7 million visits to Hong Kong. Interestingly, Hong Kong’s closer integration with the mainland in terms of the increased convenience of its cross-border rail services and wider usage of the WeChat Pay and AliPay systems has also aided the migration of consumption out of Hong Kong to Shenzhen. Retail sales in Hong Kong dropped 14.7 per cent in April from a year earlier. For the first quarter of 2024, the figure was down 1.3 per cent year on year. In Shenzhen, consumer spending rose 4 per cent in the same period...  As a technology hub, Shenzhen’s economy has already overtaken Hong Kong’s since 2018. The municipal government, which cultivated the industry with targeted policies including talent schemes and tax incentives, now counts tech conglomerate Tencent Holdings and electric carmaker BYD among its start-up successes...  “Hong Kong’s role as a star in the Greater Bay Area (GBA) is fading as it lacks innovation and has been too dependent on real estate development to generate income,” Mr Lee said, referring to the economic region comprising Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macau. “For years, Hong Kong used to rank top in competitiveness among all Chinese cities. But Shenzhen and Guangzhou have risen up silently in recent years.” Macau is another close competitor that appears to often escape Hong Kongers’ notice. While local news reports in early 2024 went to town on how Hong Kong should emulate Singapore in securing major concerts by global stars such as Taylor Swift and British rock band Coldplay, none played up the fact that the biggest acts in Hong Kong’s immediate region, such as US singer Bruno Mars and US pop band OneRepublic, mostly went to Macau. Industry players blamed Hong Kong’s lack of large venues while officials attributed it to the government’s principle of allowing entertainment events a free hand to operate. A new 50,000-seat stadium would soon draw to Hong Kong its share of mega concerts, they promised. The city’s current two biggest concert venues seat 12,500 people each. Meanwhile, Macau – whose two largest venues each seat about 15,000 people – hosted some 240 concerts in 2023. It was a threefold rise from the pre-pandemic years and Hong Kong singers accounted for 60 per cent of those concerts, Macau media reported...  Macau, which has traditionally relied on its casinos as its main economic driver, has made a concerted effort to boost its non-gaming entertainment sector. The rebranding push comes after China’s 2022 crackdown on high-rollers that made up half the city’s gaming revenues, and the Chinese authorities’ imposition of stricter regulations on the casino industry... Where two decades ago Hong Kong was consistently the world’s busiest container port, now a string of mainland ports have knocked it out of the top 10 rankings...  Ultimately, HKUST’s Prof Low puts Hong Kongers’ fixation on how their city fares against Singapore – often to the exclusion of its Chinese competitors – down to “a reflection of Hong Kong’s self-image”. “Hong Kong sees itself as an international financial centre, and in that respect, no other Chinese city comes even close,” he said"

The Difference Between Korean BBQ and Japanese BBQ | Explained - "One of the main differences between Korean BBQ and Japanese BBQ is how each is prepared. Korean BBQ is cooked on a Korean BBQ table grill where meat is grilled on gas or charcoal grills that are inlaid into the dining table. Japanese BBQ involves cooking meat either over a Japanese hibachi table grill, which is a small, portable barbecue made from cast iron; or a Japanese teppanyaki grill, which features a solid flat griddle and works with a propane flame...  Another difference between Korean BBQ and Japanese BBQ is the way that the meat is flavored. Korean BBQ adds flavor by soaking meat in marinade to make it well seasoned and more flavorful, while Japanese BBQ focuses on the taste of the meat and incorporates various dipping sauces such as garlic, mirin (a type of rice wine that is a common ingredient in Japanese cooking) and soy sauce to add flavor to non-marinated meat. Korean BBQ and Japanese BBQ both incorporate beef and chicken into their dishes, although Japanese BBQ tends to focus more on high-quality cuts of beef whereas Korean BBQ also prominently features pork in its dishes.  Korean BBQ comes in several different varieties including bulgogi, which consists of meat that has been soaked in a mixture of sugar, ginger, soy sauce, sesame oil, pepper, garlic and scallions before being prepared on a Korean BBQ grill table. Another type of Korean BBQ is galbi, which is made with beef short ribs that have been marinated with soy sauce, sugar, water, mirin and onions and then prepared on a Korean barbecue grill table. Other Korean BBQ varieties include daeji bulgogi (spicy pork that is immersed in sauce made with gochu garu, a type of Korean chili powder), as well as jumulleok, which features short steak marinated with sesame oil, salt and pepper.  Japanese BBQ styles include yakiniku, where pork and beef are sliced into bite-sized pieces and baked into charcoal; yakiton, which grills different pork meat cuts over charcoal; and yakitori, which typically features grilled chicken charcoal roasted on skewers until the outside is crispy and the inside is tender. Teppanyaki is another popular style of Japanese BBQ that consists of thin slices of beef mixed with soy sauce and sugar and cooked on a Japanese teppanyaki grill.  Korean BBQ and Japanese BBQ are also served differently. Korean BBQ is served with a wide variety of vegetable side dishes known as banchan that range from kimchi and spicy cucumber salad to seasoned spinach and kongnamul muchim, otherwise known as seasoned soybean sprouts. On the other hand, Japanese BBQ keeps things more simple and the meat is handled with chopsticks and served alongside a smaller selection of raw vegetables with dipping sauces."

LA Times Hit Piece on Chloe Cole

This is a good explainer of woke delegitimisation, which applies in other areas too. Logical fallacies are used because people fall for them.

Wokal Distance on X

"The @latimes ran a hit-piece on @ChoooCole

I'm going to go through the piece and explain the various strategies and tactics the author uses to smear Chloe's motives and character. 

If you want to win, you need to know how the Gender Ideology smear machine works 

Let's go

To understand why the piece was written you need to know who Chloe Cole is, and *WHY* they want to attack her.

@ChoooCole is an former "trans kid" who had her puberty blocked, got put on Testosterone, and had her breasts removed when she was 15. She tells the full story here

The Blockers, hormones, and surgeries done to Chloe have done what @AbigailShrier calls "irreversible damage," and Chloe now lives with this pain. 

Now Chloe goes around the world warning people about the dangers of gender ideology, and the dangers of "gender affirming care."

As perverse and evil as it sounds, this tragic story is part of the reason the L.A. Times is attacking her 

You see, because Chloe actually had gender transition surgery, she has both the social standing and moral authority to speak about gender ideology and gender medicine...

As such that Transgender Activists can't just dismiss @ChoooCole

When a regular person questions Gender Transition for minors the activists can dismiss them by saying "you're not a doctor," "you have no experience," or calling them transphobic. 

That won't work with Chloe.

Chloe actually went through Blockers, Hormones, and Gender Surgery, was irreversibly damaged so they cannot dismiss here. This means the activists have to find some other way of pushing back against Chloe, and this is where the L.A. Times hit piece comes in. 

I'll explain...

In order to see what is going on you need to understand something about woke activists: The woke don't try to win by arguing woke views are true and views the woke disagree with are false. 

They try to win by socially *DELEGITIMIZING* the people and ideas they disagree with.

The woke do not try to win by presenting the facts and the truth. 

The woke try to win by getting the upper hand in the conversation. They want social influence, prestige, clout, status, moral authority and credibility needed to get people to agree with them.

Woke gender activists try to win by using 2 moves: 

1. They try to ensure they are the only ones with the social standing, moral authority, and intellectual credibility to be listened to 

2. Remove the social standing, and moral authority of anyone who opposes gender ideology

Gender Activists want all the social influence, prestige, status, and authority for themselves so everyone listens to them; and they want to diminish the influence, authority, credibility, standing and status of any person they disagree with in order to delegitimize dissent.

The Gender activists are engaged in a *SOCIAL* fight for *POWER*...not a battle over what is actually true. 

And this is why they attack @ChoooCole

Let's take a look at some examples so you can see the various moves that are used to attack Chloe's credibility.

The article does not seek to attack Chloe directly. Rather, the article seeks to suggest, hint, and insinuate that Chloe Cole is being motivated by money, clout chasing, and fame rather then a genuine concern for Kids...and that the right is using her as a political pawn.

The first paragraph below is a masterclass in framing. The framing here suggests that Chloe discredits other people's stories, but they don't discredit Chloe. The unstated suggestion being that Chloe is not being fair to people she disagrees with. 

See how that works?

The problem is that Chloe doesn't discredit other people's stories, her point is not that people don'thave their experiences....her point is that she had the exact same experiences other trans kids have, and that is when she wanted to have transition surgery.

Chloe is not discrediting the experiences of youth who struggle with gender, she is saying the opposite: that she (chloe) UNDERSTANDS their experience because she had the same sorts of experiences with gender dysphoria. 

Do you see how that first paragraph distorts the truth?

The second move the article makes is to try and impugn Chloe's motives by suggesting she is in it for the money. 

The article tells us what Chloe charges to speak, but it does not tell us how much money Marci Bowers (a transgender surgeon) makes doing gender surgeries....

The article questions @ChoooCole's motives, but not the motives of the surgeon who gets paid to perform the gender surgeries 

The article goes out of its way to insinuate that Chloe is in it to make a buck, while treating Marci Bowers like a neutral and respectable expert.

The next move the article uses is to attempt to make it look like Chloe is motivated by an attempt to get popularity because the LGBT people kicked her out. 

It is not until the last paragraph of the article where it is stated that Chloe is doing this for attention (pic 3)

It is suggested that Chloe is not doing her activism out of a sense of deep conviction, but rather out of a combination of grifting to get money and for attention seeking and validation seeking. Do you see how this works?

The article also goes out of it's way to interview experts who disagree with Chloe, but no medical experts who agree with Chloe get interviewed.
As such, the story is *framed* as "Activist Chloe who is out to make a buck and get attention VS. neutral medical experts."

The article is not trying to argue that Chloe is wrong about the facts. The article is trying to delegitimize Chloe's activism by subverting her social standing and draining her moral authority by making it look like she is in it for money and attention 

See how that works?

The article wants to deconstruct Chloe's story of "Teen girl gets pulled into gender ideology and gets damaged by 'gender Medicine,' and regrets it" 

It wants to turn her story into "girl regrets transition, so she cynically used her story to make money and get famous"

What the article wants to do is to undercut the power of Chloe's story by making it look like what happened to her is her own fault, and that now she is milking her story in order to make money. 

it is an attack on her reputation, standing, authority and credibility.

The article makes no mention of Chloe's extensive medical bills, the fact that insurance won't cover many aspects of the care she needs, or the fact her entire family has been doxxed by Trans activists. That part gets ignored by the article. 

See how this works?

The Woke activists do not try to win by being correct about the facts....they try to win by socially *DELEGITIMIZING* the people and ideas they disagree with. 

They don't want to win the battle for truth, they want to win the battle over who gets to have *social power*

They want control over who is listened to, who is taken seriously, who is believed, who was social standing, and who has the moral authority to speak on social issues. 

And they are willing to smear @ChoooCole to get what they want. 

THAT is that the article is doing."

Links - 2nd August 2024 (1 - Drugs)

Adam Zivo: No Dr. Bonnie Henry, drug prohibition is not ‘white supremacy’ - "The notion that drug prohibition is inherently racist has become exceedingly popular within the harm reduction world and, by extension, inside many public health institutions and graduate programs. Yet anyone with even a cursory knowledge of history can see that this is absurd. Societies from all across the world have long understood the dangers of addictive substances and supported efforts to criminalize them—so why is this being ignored?  Though the “prohibition is racist” movement usually flies under the public’s radar, it was thrust into the limelight earlier this month when B.C.’s top doctor, Bonnie Henry, released a report calling for the legalization of all drugs. Not only did Henry recommend that dangerous substances—including meth, cocaine and fentanyl—be sold in stores much like alcohol and cannabis, her team asserted that prohibitionist policies are “based on a history of racism, white supremacy, paternalism, colonialism, classism and human rights violations.”  One would hope such sweeping declarations would have been backed with fulsome arguments and historical references, but that didn’t happen here."

Sam Cooper on X - "At a certain point you have to look at BC’s political institutions and leaders and think not only are some captured in a corrupt narco economy but some are useful idiots with views apologetic to a narco economy that will only make BC’s drug overdose crisis worsen."

Psychologists Debunk the 'Lazy Stoner' Stereotype - "People who regularly smoke cannabis aren't as lazy or unmotivated as people tend to think, according to a new study in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science. In fact, having smoked weed appeared to have no impact on people's motivation levels at all... The researchers additionally found that people who regularly smoke weed had higher levels of positive emotions like gratitude, and lower levels of fear and anxiety, when they were high, but those who were on the highest end of chronic use experienced more negative emotions both when high and when sober. Previous research into how weed can affect motivation mostly failed to consider variations among cannabis users and non-users, such as differences in personality, mental health, or the use of other psychoactive substances, the researchers noted. Accordingly, this study is one of the first to account for these differences."

As Canadian drug deaths rise, programs to keep users safe face backlash
Clearly, this is proof that even more "harm reduction" is needed. Of course, the article just quotes experts claiming they save lives, without referring to the actual evidence (or lack thereof)

ZIVO: B.C. dodges a bullet by rejecting 'safe supply' of all hard drugs - "Thank God the B.C. government has rejected the latest reckless proposals from safer-supply advocate Dr. Bonnie Henry... According to Henry, the “main driver” of Canada’s overdose crisis is “a prohibitionist approach to drugs that has produced a highly toxic unregulated drug supply.” If all addictive substances could be manufactured and purchased legally, in a regulated manner that would assure their quality, then countless lives could be saved, she reasons. But there is almost no evidence to back up these claims. The report itself acknowledges that there is “little published information” on full-scale drug legalization and that existing research only explores “potential approaches” (a.k.a.: this research is theoretical). Faced with an evidentiary void, the report relied on conjecture, specious arguments and misrepresentations. For example, Henry’s team compared the legal sale of hard drugs to the sale of toys, groceries, clothing and marijuana... Henry’s team ignored how the widespread, legal availability of “safe” pharmaceutical narcotics caused North America’s current opioid epidemic ; in the entire almost-100-page report, the OxyContin crisis was mentioned only obliquely in one sentence. The report further claimed that drug prohibition was “based on a history of racism, white supremacy, paternalism, colonialism, classicism and human rights violations.” To justify this claim, the authors leaned into the fact that Canada’s original prohibition laws, dating back to the early 20th century, were motivated by a fear of Chinese immigrants who used opium. Sure, dozens of Indigenous reserves across Canada have independently banned alcohol and drugs —  most community leaders oppose drug legalization and some even refer to safer supply as “pharmaceutical colonialism” —  but apparently we must ignore them. That is just their internalized racism speaking. Similarly, should we pretend that strict drug prohibition doesn’t exist in Shariah law and the justice systems of many contemporary Asian states? Confronted by oceans of white supremacy and moved by the “discrimination” allegedly experienced by drug users, Henry has determined that expanding “safer supply” is the only way to go. But there’s a problem: Canada’s current “medicalized” system requires drug users to obtain a prescription for their taxpayer-funded addictive substances. This restricts legal access to hard drugs, imposes “surveillance” upon users and — hold your gasps —  implies that habitual use of these drugs is a medical problem, rather than a legitimate lifestyle choice. The report thus favoured “non-medical safer supply” wherein “gatekeepers” (physicians and nurse practitioners) would be removed from the equation. If most health-care professionals refuse to prescribe safer supply (because they believe it is reckless ), then they must simply be gotten rid of, it seems... The report also attempted to justify the “non-medical” model by citing the alleged successes of Canada’s existing safer supply programs. But not only is such an extrapolation logically unsupportable, the inconvenient truth is that no reliable evidence of success actually exists. Henry referenced a 2024 study published in the British Medical Journal that followed 5,882 B.C. drug users for 18 months and found that those who received safer supply drugs were 61% to 91% less likely to die the following week. However, seven physicians who reviewed the study found that its underlying data actually suggested that safer supply had no statistically significant impact on deaths. Harm-reduction researchers had simply cherry-picked their data (i.e. fixated on one-week outcomes while ignoring longer-term measures, which is highly unusual) to create a mirage of success. Most of the other studies cited by Henry relied on self-reported surveys and interviews with safer supply clients. This kind of low-quality research , which amounts to glorified customer testimonials, would not be acceptable in most health-care settings. Similarly, Henry claimed that the decades of research supporting opioid agonist therapy (i.e. methadone and Suboxone) also showed that safer supply works — yet addiction physicians say these are totally different interventions with non-transferable evidence bases. Just this February, Henry was forced to admit in a report that safer supply is “not fully evidence-based.” Now she is putting glitter on junk science and engaging in mental gymnastics to advocate for the program’s radical and unprecedented expansion. Over the past year, it has become painfully obvious that the opioids currently being distributed through safer supply are being widely diverted to the black market , where they are flooding communities, enriching gangs and fuelling new addictions among adults and youth . Predictably, Henry glossed over these issues and omitted any reference to organized crime. She repeatedly claimed that “non-medical safer supply” would be provided responsibly, with “guardrails” in place to prevent diversion. But it is hard to take this seriously when her report claimed it is “paramount” that active drug users, addicted or not, take a leadership role in developing and implementing the experiment. Perhaps not incidentally, the report also explicitly stated that any medical monitoring of safer supply — such as urine tests and witnessed consumption —  should be removed for the sake of “reducing barriers.” These measures are among the few tools available to prevent or track diversion, but they apparently cause “discomfort” among drug users... But if Premier David Eby truly opposes drug legalization, why does Henry, who has pushed this agenda for years , still have a job? It should not escape our notice that there is a provincial election coming in October, and that Eby rolled back other radical drug policies — such as the unrestricted consumption of illicit drugs in hospitals — only after his party had fallen in the polls. If his government is re-elected, what will happen with Henry’s recommendations then?"

KLEIN: Supervised Consumption Sites: A step towards harm reduction or a gateway to increased harm? - "a 2017 report by the Vancouver Police Department noted a 36% increase in calls for service related to mental health, suspicious circumstances, and public disorder within 500 meters of Insite. The area around the facility has seen a notable rise in petty crimes such as theft and vandalism. Discarded needles pose a significant biohazard risk, endangering public health. A study by the B.C. Centre for Disease Control found that needle-stick injuries among the public increased in neighbourhoods surrounding supervised consumption sites... Statistics reveal that less than 5% of users make the shift towards treatment. Rather than serving as a gateway to recovery, these sites often become hubs of continued drug use, drawing more users and fostering addiction. The notion of encouraging drug use with minimal conversion to treatment seems more like perpetuating harm than reducing it. Government funds might be better spent on treatment and recovery programs rather than facilities that merely enable addiction. The situation in San Francisco provides another cautionary example. The city’s Tenderloin district, home to multiple harm reduction programs, has seen an escalation in public drug use and associated social issues. According to the San Francisco Chronicle , there was a 70% increase in reported incidents of public drug use and a 50% rise in drug-related crimes following the establishment of these programs. Local businesses have reported significant financial losses due to the decline in foot traffic and the negative perception of the area... In 2021, Oregon decriminalized small amounts of illicit drugs, resulting in a surge in public drug use and opioid overdoses. The law stipulated a fine of less than $100 for possession, which could be waived by calling a 24-hour addiction screening hotline. However, only 1% of those fined utilized this hotline, leading to skyrocketing overdose rates. Consequently, Oregon lawmakers are now reconsidering their stance and moving towards recriminalizing drug use. Portugal’s experience, often cited by harm reduction proponents, also offers a mixed picture. While the country saw initial success in reducing overdose deaths and HIV infection rates following decriminalization, recent reports suggest a resurgence in drug use and related social problems. A 2018 study by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction indicated a 20% increase in drug-related deaths over five years, raising concerns about the long-term efficacy of harm reduction policies."

LILLEY: Evidence shows safe supply diversion is a problem - "Police in London, Ont., held a news conference on Monday to lay out how bad the situation really is and, in part, to play defence... opioid pills seized by police in London went from just a few hundred in 2019 to more than 30,000 in 2023... “Diverted safe supply is being resold into our community, it is being trafficked into other communities, and it is being used as currency in exchange for fentanyl, fuelling the drug trade.”... Unlike other treatments for addicts like methadone, safe supply doesn’t require any supervision, they don’t take the pills at the pharmacy. Instead, the addict is given dozens of 8mg pills per day which come with a high street value. There have been doctors raising the alarm about safe supply across the country, and journalists like me and Zivo have written stories, hosted podcasts, and published video interviews on the topic. The activists have denied there was anything wrong, the politicians have claimed that accusations of safe supply being diverted were misinformation and disinformation. Despite evidence collected from the streets of Vancouver, the pleas from families experiencing hell in the suburbs of the lower mainland or questions raised in London, it was dismissed. Dr. Andrea Sereda, one of the main doctors behind the London safe supply program, refused to answer many straightforward questions about safe supply at a Parliamentary committee earlier this year and tried to infer that pills were not being diverted... “We have no evidence that they are ending up in the hands of children. We have no scientific data that supports those assertions,” Sereda said... A while later, Sereda was speaking to an activist group called Moms Stop the Harms — and apparently when she thought no one who disagrees with her would notice — she admitted diversion was happening. “I’m not going to stand up here and say that some kids, some adolescents, are not accessing diverted safe supply and using diverted safe supply,” she said."

Coalition of drug user groups wants court to quash B.C. drug 'recriminalization' - "When the federal government allowed British Columbia to walk back its experiment with drug decriminalization, the move wasn't surprising to Brittany Maple, executive director of the Matsqui-Abbotsford Impact Society. "It's disheartening," Maple said. "We are effectively criminalizing people for existing in public spaces when they have nowhere else safe to exist." Now, Maple's society has teamed up with a coalition of drug user advocacy groups to take the federal government to court, claiming the decision to recriminalize public drug possession in B.C. puts users at increased risk of death."
So now, if you're not allowed to do drugs, you're not allowed to exist. This is even more amazing than TRA mumbo jumbo logic
If one argues that pro-drug policies put drug users at increased risk of death, can drugs be totally banned and users forced to go into treatment?

Dr. Sharon Koivu: 'Safe supply' has only worsened the addiction crisis in London, Ont. - "I lived close to the health centre, and I initially supported the program... Clients are often prescribed 30 to 40 Dilaudid pills per day, many of which are being diverted. This is fuelling the use of illicit fentanyl, which began appearing on the streets of London in 2018, leading to an increase in overdoses . I am repeatedly hearing disturbing stories that people with prescriptions are vulnerable to violence. Diversion appears to have shifted from being sold to individuals to being sold to organized crime as more is appearing in large amounts in police seizures. It is also causing significant harm to the patients I serve. From 2012 to 2017, I rarely saw patients with spine infections. In the summer of 2017, I saw five patients in one month. The numbers continued to climb. The common thread among most of them was that they were injecting Dilaudid tablets. Most told me that they were buying diverted Dilaudid from clients of the “safe supply” program, while others were in the program directly. I had patients who were housed, using clean equipment and only injecting Dilaudid, developing horrific infections. Spine infections cause perhaps the worst suffering I have ever seen. Not only are they unbearably painful, but they can also cause paraplegia or quadriplegia. Since 2017, I have been part of the care team in about 100 hospitalizations of people with injection drug-related spine infections. In June of 2018, I had my first patient tell me that he had left his apartment to live in a tent near the pharmacy and “safe supply” clinic from which much diversion takes place. This was because “safe supply” pills were cheaper and more abundant near the source... Over the past year, we have seen about one patient per month with a spine infection. Half of these were receiving a “safe supply” prescription and half reported buying diverted Dilaudid. About 30 people per month are admitted with another severe infection. Of patients admitted with opioid use disorder, 25 per cent were receiving a “safe supply” prescription and 25 per cent reported using diverted Dilaudid. Only four per cent of our consults were for an unintentional overdose. The failure of “safe supply” was predictable. Purdue Pharma’s OxyContin helped start the addiction crisis, and Dilaudid, which is also manufactured by Purdue, is an even stronger and more addictive opioid. I and many of my addiction physician colleagues have been warning about the pending harms from the start. Public Health Ontario data shows that the harms we’ve been warning about are very real. Prior to the start of the “safe supply” program, the Middlesex-London area was principally less than or equal to the provincial average rates for measured harms from opioid toxicity (i.e., emergency room visits, hospitalizations and deaths). Since the “safe supply” program started and expanded, the harms experienced in Middlesex-London have escalated substantially, beyond the rates experienced in the rest of the province... It has also been costly to the emergency department. In 2014, emergency department visits were lower than average. In 2015, they were five per cent higher in Middlesex-London than the rest of Ontario. From 2020 to 2022, emergency department visits were, on average, 80 per cent higher. Interestingly, London Health Sciences Centre has a $76 million deficit even after receiving a $95 million bailout from Queen’s Park. While hospital budgets are complex and multifactorial, this deficit parallels the expansion of London’s “safe supply” program. Instead of saving health-care dollars, “safe supply“ is costly. Importantly, as I referenced previously, when “safe supply” started in 2016, we did not have a problem with illicit fentanyl in London. We do now. Many patients have told me they sell or trade much of their prescribed “safe supply” to buy fentanyl. Others, not in the program, have told me that their dealers have sold them fentanyl after claiming to be out of Dilaudid, starting them down that path. Our hospital experience shows that “safe supply” is also preventing patients from choosing opioid agonist therapy and the opportunity for recovery."
Damn conservative governments underfunding healthcare!

B.C. police admit diverted opioids flood streets - "In a House of Commons health committee hearing this week, two high ranking police representatives disclosed several unsettling facts about the widespread diversion of “safer supply” opioids. However, their testimony also included questionable remarks, which suggest that the province’s police leadership may be playing down the extent of the problem. Fiona Wilson, who is deputy chief of the Vancouver Police Department and president of the B.C. Association of Chiefs of Police (BCACP), told parliamentarians that roughly half of the hydromorphone recently seized in the province can be attributed to safer supply... To give context, she estimated that approximately 20 per cent of the people who are prescribed hydromorphone in B.C. are enrolled in a safer supply program — which implies that, per capita, safer supply clients divert four times more hydromorphone to the black market than people who receive the drug for other reasons (i.e. chronic pain patients). This data apparently came as a shock to Premier David Eby, who told reporters on Tuesday that it was the first time that he had ever heard of it. If this is indeed true, then that casts doubt upon the province’s repeated and emphatic claims that it is “closely monitoring” safer supply diversion. While harm reduction advocates have said that safer supply diversion is a rare or insignificant phenomenon, Wilson’s testimony demolished that position. When a taxpayer-funded program is doubling the street supply of a pharmaceutical opioid that is as potent as heroin, that is hardly insignificant. However, the diversion problem may actually be worse than Wilson let on, because there may in fact be far fewer safer supply patients diverting even larger quantities of hydromorphone... It is notoriously difficult to prove whether diverted hydromorphone originates from safer supply or not, as the federal government inexplicably refuses to make any safer supply drugs “traceable” through special dyes, shapes and chemical identifiers... McDonald also made some questionable claims. Among other things, he said that, at present, “We do not have evidence to suggest that safer supply has been diverted outside of British Columbia.” This statement directly contradicted the testimony of Prince George RCMP Cpl. Jennifer Cooper, who told me last month that her detachment had proven that interprovincial diversion was occurring “through ongoing investigations that involve other departments and other police agencies.” There have been ongoing concerns that the B.C. RCMP’s leadership is deliberately ignoring safer supply. Last month, the leadership, in contradiction to several lower-ranking detachments, claimed that there is “no evidence” of widespread diversion and concurrently issued a memo, which was leaked to media, instructing local detachments to avoid speaking about the issue with reporters."

The Brothers Keepers' child solider who trafficked safe supply opioids - "His story was illuminating, as it demolishes the B.C. NDP’s claims that widespread trafficking of safer supply is not taking place... Logan said that every single homeless person he knew who was on safer supply would sell or trade their free drugs"

Canadian drug advocacy group founders charged with trafficking - "Two founders of a drug advocacy group who sold cocaine, methamphetamine and heroin in defiance of Canada’s federal government have been charged with trafficking-related offences.  Police in Vancouver said charges of possession for the purposes of trafficking were approved on 31 May against 28-year-old Jeremy Kalicum and 33-year-old Eris Nyx, co-founders of the Drug User Liberation Front. Kalicum and Nyx were arrested in October, but were only charged recently, and are due to appear in court on 2 July. In 2022, DULF made headlines after the volunteer-led group announced it would offer pure cocaine, methamphetamine and heroin to users as part of a “compassion club” to prevent overdose deaths...  the pair challenged Health Canada’s decision not to approve the exemption, arguing the decision leaves people who use drugs “fully and directly exposed” to the toxicity crisis and violates two clauses of Canada’s charter of rights and freedoms: the right to life and a right to equal protection under the law."

LILLEY: Toronto's overdose numbers bad, city's solutions worse - "The city’s public health officials issued their report for last year and lamented the horrors of the “unregulated drug supply” and “the drug toxicity crisis” while calling for “collaborative solutions.” “This is more than a public health issue – it’s a human tragedy that demands we respond with empathy, care and compassion,” Dr. Eileen de Villa, Toronto’s medical officer of health, said in a statement. Yes, we should respond with empathy, care and compassion, but the main solutions advocated by de Villa have been a disaster where they have been tried. It was just four weeks ago that de Villa was still advocating that Toronto seek permission for decriminalization of all hard drugs. She made that call after British Columbia’s NDP government had declared their experiment with decriminalization a disaster. She has also fully embraced so-called safer supply, which — despite opposition from the Ford government at Queen’s Park — became a reality in Toronto because of funding from the Trudeau Liberals... The problem, as has been well documented, is that addicts will often sell these drugs to buy stronger drugs like fentanyl and the pills are sold on the street, often to younger users. In British Columbia, where decriminalization and safer supply were fully embraced — similar to what de Villa wants here — the results have been catastrophic. Despite embracing every measure sold by the advocates to reduce overdoses, deaths from drug consumption have gone up every year, but one, in the last decade. Last year, British Columbia saw in excess of 2,500 overdose deaths , more than Ontario, despite having one-third of the population. Between Jan. 1 and March 31, the province of 5 million saw 527 overdose deaths , more than Toronto saw all of last year with a population of just over 3 million. On a per capita basis, B.C. sees roughly three times as many overdose deaths as Toronto. Following in B.C.’s footsteps — as de Villa and her colleagues at City Hall want — is ludicrous... The specific choice of those words shows that they don’t view drug use and addiction as part of the problem, they see the toxic nature of the drugs as the problem. It’s not that someone is using heroin or fentanyl, it’s that they are using dirty street drugs. This is the language used by those who want a regulated supply of opioids, provided free of charge but paid for by you and me. That’s a policy no resident of the city should be willing to accept."

Adam Zivo: Audio recordings reveal disruption plot by harm reduction activists - "Upon learning of the conference’s existence, Canadian harm reduction activists developed a plan for disruption. National Post obtained audio recordings and screenshots of two large Zoom meetings, which occurred on May 21 and 28, wherein approximately 20 activists, led by the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU), consolidated their plans. Attendees included staff from the BC Civil Liberties Association, BC Health Coalition, Unity Health Toronto and two influential B.C. government bodies: Vancouver Coastal Health and First Nations Health Authority... the group confirmed plans to plant harm reduction activists at the event and have them interrupt key talks. They also explored having a volunteer attend with a hidden camera to film and photograph attendees, while having a separate individual film outside the event. “I think you should fill up paint in a fire extinguisher and just spray them all, because they actually, like when we disrupted one of their meetings, like the doctor’s meeting, they were too scared to come near us. They were too scared to kick all of us out,” said Zoë Dodd, a prominent Toronto-based harm reduction activist , as the group approvingly laughed. “And we filmed everything. We filmed their talks. We filmed them. We just kept filming.” Among the group was Dr. Thomas Kerr, Director of Research at the British Columbia Centre on Substance Use (BCCSU), a research organization with significant influence over provincial and national addiction policymaking. Last year, the BCCSU was accused of organizing a smear campaign against clinical psychologist Dr. Julian Somers, who is presenting at PROSPER, after he publicly criticized safer supply... The group debated whether they should dye the water in the fountain red to symbolize blood. “Love the idea of the fountains with dye —  that makes for pretty rad images in the media,” typed Tanis Rose, co-executivee Director of the Mountainside Harm Reduction Society, into the meeting chat. Several activists were unsure of the legality of this stunt. One expressed concern that the blood idea would “discredit” them and harm relationships with Canadian universities. That activist instead advocated for parking a car right up against the building entrance and honking its horn. The activists discussed at length how they could manipulate the media into picking up their talking points, and debated the use of more moderate actions, such as drawing chalk outlines to symbolize dead bodies and using video recordings of disrupted talks to “embarrass” Falcon and Rustad. They believed that if anyone criticized the use of chalk in the media, they would look like “little b****hes.”... For years, harm reduction activists have used well organized tactics to silence opponents, but these recordings provide a glimpse into the sophistication of their work and suggest growing desperation amid crumbling public support."
Left wingers are so threatened by the free flow of ideas

Washington State’s Keeping Families Together Act blamed for enabling the horrific stabbing death of 4-year-old boy by his own mother - "Janet Garcia, 27 appeared in Snohomish County Court following her arrest Friday as the suspect in the death of her son Ariel Garcia. Police believe that Janet Garcia stabbed the 4-year-old “up to 41 times” during a vicious attack in Everett, WA last week... In July 2023, the Keeping Families Together Act went into effect and allowed the drug-addicted and homeless to maintain custody of children because circumstances such as substance abuse or inadequate housing don’t constitute imminent physical harm to a child, according to state Democrats.  The results of the legislation have already been tragic.  Earlier this year, James Kennedy, the Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney and Coroner told King 5 that the law needs to be changed after a three-week-old baby was found dead in the bushes near a lagoon in Port Townsend with blood dripping from its nose and strapped to a car seat.  According to court documents, the baby was born with fentanyl in his system, and the mother also tested positive for fentanyl. The Washington State Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF) gave temporary custody to Jordan Sorenson, the father of the infant, despite a lengthy criminal history dating back to when he was a minor, including 28 warrants for failure to appear or comply, four felony convictions as an adult, and two felony convictions as a minor, eight gross misdemeanor convictions and two pending misdemeanors.  Though he passed an initial drug test to care for the baby, he then began not complying with drug testing, and then, a few days later, he disappeared with the baby.  The baby’s mother told DCYF that Sorensen had used black market-purchased urine to pass his drug test. He was eventually found without the child. He led police to the spot where he put the baby’s body and claimed he fell asleep with the baby on his lap and woke up to find the baby dead between his body and the chair he was sitting in.  Sorensen was charged with kidnapping, disposing of a body, and concealing a body... “We just keep pouring down more services to the dark hole and it causes harm. I expect them to understand how to climb out someday. Love and compassion for your fellow man is not giving them the tools to kill themselves. And it just makes me sick. We have all these government-funded heroin dens and booty bumping kits. I mean, that's our tax dollars paying for that junk. And it's not helping anyone. We have like just this, this mass casualty on our streets.”  Couture continued, “More people died in 2022 from drug deaths and overdose deaths, then died since 2001 in Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan.”"

Sunday, July 28, 2024

Links - 28th July 2024 (Star Wars: The Acolyte)

V for Viennetta on X - "There's something a little off about this new Disney cut! 🤔 @Nerdrotics @LadyGravemaster @KenobiStig"
"If you only knew the power of mAnNnyYy" - YouTube

Meme - "Jedi Master: Dies by fruit knife
Random girl: Impaled by lightsaber, flesh wound."
*The Acolyte's Master Indara vs Ahsoka's Sabine Wren*

Why Does Every Star Wars Villain Have A Helmet Now? - "in the last decade things have changed. Star Wars has tried to cash in on our collective nostalgia with a new trilogy of films and a slew of TV series that are far too numerous for any person to have seen them all...   What’s worse than the quantity of these shows is how they trade solely in that nostalgia. Nearly every series forgoes a satisfying conclusion in lieu of bringing back a familiar face from some other show or movie. There’s no catharsis, no real endings. Every show is just a sizzle reel for the next one, context for the wider universe...   There are exceptions, of course. The first season of The Mandalorian was just Din Djarin doing stuff. It was great. Then Luke Skywalker turned up. Ironically, Andor was excellent too. The Star Wars show that’s specifically a prequel to a movie that cashed in on a single line of the original film is more original and interesting than nearly every original idea that Lucasfilm has tried to make stick in the past ten years.  This is why I was excited for The Acolyte. I was hoping for another Star Wars show that was wholly original, separate from the wider universe. I don’t want every protagonist to be a Skywalker or impact the fate of the universe. I want some people just to save their friends or their mum. But The Acolyte fell into another trap that modern Star Wars has fallen into: The Curse of the Helmet.  Every Star Wars villain wears a helmet now. Kylo Ren kicked off the trend, but he had fair reasons. The narrative metaphor of trying to erase all traces of Ben Solo, face included, is strong. He’s also trying to ape his grandfather, Darth Vader. The Force Awakens dealt so strongly in nostalgia that it rehashed the plot of the original movie practically beat for beat, but I didn’t mind Ren’s helmet.  His followers, however, were a different story. Aside from the fact that the Knights of Ren were ruined by the hotswapping directors with seemingly no communication between them, why did they have helmets? Because their boss does? Because they were meant to be fleshed out with proper actors with real faces in later films but the idea was scrapped in favour of Palpatine returning?  Sadly, The Acolyte’s villain wears a helmet. And not just any helmet, a real goofy number with… teeth? There’s a reason for The Stranger’s helmet – it’s entirely created in order to create the big reveal of the Sith lord’s true identity as that bloke from that shop in the episode before. However, I think there’s another reason.   How has Star Wars made all its money? Hint: it’s not through movies. It’s through toys and merchandise. Why did they make a baby Yoda? To sell baby Yoda toys. Why is there always a new droid companion to every protagonist? To sell new droid companion toys. Why is every villain wearing a helmet? To sell toy helmets.  This has the knock-on effect of making The Stranger toys cheaper, too. Back in the ‘70s, Lucasfilm could probably get away with paying Mark Hamill, Carrie Fisher, and Harrison Ford a few quid for the rights to slap their likeness on a plastic doll, but these days actors will charge a (deserved) premium. Popping a helmet on a character means you have to pay them less (and often nothing) to make toys of their character. It also makes it easier to find actors to play them at the Star Wars theme parks. There’s a reason Kylo Ren stalks around Galaxy’s Edge, rather than Ben Solo."

Meme - Star Wars: Gamers: "Occupational Safety and Health Administration"
"Disney: We need a name for the protagonist of The Acolyte.
Kathleen Kennedy: Say no more *Osha*"

Meme - "If YOU ARE TELLING A STORY ABOUT SOMETHING YOU KNEW AND YOU DIDN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT YOU ARE NOT A WITNESS, YOU ARE AN ACCOMPLICE" - DL HUGHLY *Leslye Headland with Harvey Weinstein*
It should be "DL HUGHLEY". But this only applies when it pushes the left wing agenda

Star Wars: The Acolyte Subverts Fan Expectations and Not in a Good Way - "Indara's death is devasting and plays into a trope that is not a good one. Master Indara was at the forefront of a lot of the marketing for The Acolyte. This was partially because Carrie-Ann Moss was one of the biggest stars in the cast list and partially because fans assumed that Indara was going to be a significant part of the plot. This has followed a modern trope of using big-name actors as a marketing tool, only to immediately kill them or remove them from the project. This most famously happened with 2014's Godzilla when Bryan Cranston was marketed as the star of the film, only to be killed in the early moments of the movie. It also happened with She-Hulk, when Daredevil was used to market the show, only to be in one episode. This strategy leaves many fans feeling deceived and upset that the actors were used purely to stoke fan excitement for the movie or TV show. It creates distrust between the audience and the show's creators."

‘The Acolyte’ Star Manny Jacinto: 12 Facts About The Star Wars Actor - "Audiences have been praising Jacinto’s performance in The Acolyte, with many commenting on his incredible range, onscreen charisma and, um, muscular arms."

‘The Acolyte’ Shows The Seductive Power Of The Dark Side - "A running joke about Star Wars is that the Dark Side is deeply unappealing — traditionally, young Jedi are manipulated by disfigured, decrepit old men, the kind of guys you wouldn’t sit next to on the subway.  The fact that almost every advocate for the Dark Side has been horribly mutilated should be something of a red flag, yet the Sith always find new recruits... The Acolyte depicts its Dark Side “influencer” as charismatic and seductive."
According to the author, being against bad writing makes you "reactionary"

‘The Acolyte’ Episode 6 Recap And Review: These Short Episodes Were A Big Mistake - "I’m just not loving anything about the twin plotline. I think it’s by far the weakest link in this series, and it’s the central storyline so that’s problematic.   (The other big issue with this show is one that I’ve had with Star Wars for a long time now: The gradual decline of the Jedi as a cool, mysterious order of badasses into a stuffy, rather bland bureaucracy).   The second pupil/master subplot follows Mae and Sol (Lee Jung-jae) as they escape Khoftar and she tries to dig into what really happened when she and her sister were girls. The show has been dragging that mystery out far, far too long and continues to do so here. It’s quite annoying since it’s not an actual mystery that needs to be solved. Sol just has to tell Mae and/or Osha (and the audience) what happened. He continues to delay doing that so that the mystery is dragged out onscreen...   Ultimately, not much happens this episode and then it ends. I’m left feeling completely underwhelmed. I think the episode lengths are a big problem here. Either they need to be longer and meatier, or Disney should have released them three at a time or all at once (I don’t like the binge model, but I think this show might have benefited from it). Almost every episode this season has ended too soon and each time it’s felt kind of rushed and sudden. This episode—following the show’s most action-packed and deadly—lost whatever momentum and sense of urgency we’d picked up last week. It’s all a bit jarring...   We have just two episodes remaining and frankly I don’t know how this ends in a satisfying way unless both those episodes are a lot longer and the story starts moving. If the season ends with an irritating cliffhanger, don’t say I didn’t warn you. This show has a lot of potential but I can’t help but feel it’s pretty half-baked in its current state. It needed a lot more time in the oven."

Meme - "STAR WARS. THE BLACK SERIES. Only at Walmart. Star Wars: The Acolyte. The Stranger *naked Qimir*"

Meme - Austin Medeiros @austin_medz: "My reaction to Episode 7 *stunned witches (from Episode 7)*"

Meme - "STAR WARS. THE ACOLYTE. JUST TWO STRONG FEMALES USING THE FORCE TO MAKE A CHILD * Jenna Sativa and Shyla Jennings*"

StarWarsTheory on X - "Osha and Mae meet at the bridge, and by far the most amazing writing of the show, Sol struggles to use the force to hold the bridge with the sisters, instead of just, oh you know, use the force to hold the little girls in the air, instead of the super heavy metal bridges that are creaking, implying he's holding them up.  And then when he fails to do that simple task, he lets go of Mae, and saves Osha, by letting go of the bridges with the force, only to scream and run to Osha as she falls to her death to grab her physically with his arm outstretched, when he could have simply just used the force to save her, heck, save both.  This is the worst writing of anything I’ve ever seen.  $180M"

Erik 'daibo' Kain on X - "There's this entire sect of Star Wars fans who, whenever anything is changed for the worse (like adding a hip hop song in the credits of The Acolyte) ask "WHY ARE STAR WARS FANS SO MAD AT THIS IT'S GREAT I LOVE THIS SONG THEIR [sic] SO TOXIC".   It's this really hostile, really stubborn refusal to even try to understand why it might bother a lot of fans who grew up on John Williams scores and a very distinct aesthetic that we hope to preserve. Yet somehow old-school fans of the franchise are the bad guys.
The angry replies to this tweet are pure gold. From accusations of racism, to people telling me to "just not watch" to gross misrepresentation of what I'm saying, each and every one proves my point better than I could have without them. Thank you."
If you don't shut up and consume, you're "toxic". But if you harass people who refuse to consume quietly, you are a good person

Valliant Renegade on X - "The Acolyte was said to make us question the Jedi’s moral high ground and smear the lines of good and evil.   BUT…. The writing however was SO BAD in achieving that end that Episode 7 actually showed why the Jedi’s actions were JUSTIFIED, which therefore renders the entire rest of the attempted “mystery” story arc utterly POINTLESS.  It’s unreal what a MESS this show is."
Archer Bird 🇺🇸 on X - "They basically tried to paint the Jedi as a cop who shot a poc reaching for their glove box at a traffic stop. Except they made the Jedi look entirely reasonable for their actions."
Valliant Renegade on X - "Not a glovebox. Reaching for a GUN."

‘The Acolyte’ Episode 8 Recap And Review: A Dreadful Season Finale And The Cameos Can’t Save It - "The Acolyte was a mess from start to finish and Tuesday night’s jumbled season finale only strengthens my belief that this was a show that needed about three more drafts before going to production. Everything about this show is rough and messy, and the two very fun cameos in the finale (which we’ll discuss below) can’t save it from itself... I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised that Osha goes to the Dark Side this episode, and that Mae—by dint of losing her memory—goes over to the good guys. After all, Osha was wearing black by this point and Mae was all in white. How subtle! Then again, it’s hard to tell who the good guys are anymore, or who the bad guys are, because The Acolyte is just so angsty and edgy. It’s Star Wars for adults! Or something. Let’s be real, subverting expectations and deconstructing the Jedi is just so 2017.   The Acolyte seems hellbent on portraying the Jedi in the worst possible light and I might be able to accept this if it were just the coverup at the end when Vernestra somewhat bizarrely pins all the killings on Sol when she goes before the Senate tribunal. But this show wants very badly for us to think that what the Jedi did on Brendok is some horrific crime, when I’m right there with Sol: He was trying to protect children from what very much appeared to be a terrifying Dark Side witch cult. Of course, when Osha and Mae confront Sol after he does a little lightsaber ballet with The Stranger, they don’t bother to get his side of the story and he doesn’t bother to tell it beyond “I did the right thing. I was trying to protect you.” I guess there was no room in the script for Osha to ask “Why?” and for him to say “Well she turned into a freaky smoke monster and started to evaporate your sister so I did what anyone would do and acted in self-defense.” I will say that I was pretty darn surprised when Osha force-choked Sol to death Vader-style, though it’s so out of left field that it comes across as incredibly goofy rather than disturbing. I was probably already annoyed when, moments earlier, the Sith and Mae exchange banter copy/pasted right out of Return of the Jedi.  “Feel your anger,” Qimir says, sounding woefully less scary and intimidating than Palpatine. “This is the source of your pain. Strike him down and your journey will be complete.”... The problem with all of this isn’t merely how derivative it is—though that is a good chunk of what I find irksome—but how poorly it’s executed. Disney and the show’s creators promised us something new, something different, something unique. On all counts, they failed.  Hey look, we’re in the High Republic, 100 years before the Skywalker saga! But let’s just do the same Jedi stuff as before, right down to paraphrasing famous snippets of dialogue, only this time we’ll make the Sith look more sympathetic and the Jedi seem conniving and awful. For reasons.   Vernestra is genuine villain material at this point. Everyone theorized that she was the Sith’s Jedi Master last week and everyone was right. She senses him on Brendok and he sense her, quickly putting on his mind-control-blocking helmet. She covers everything up, most likely to cover up her own crimes or failings, though it’s not really clear yet (the episode ends with a bunch of loose ends, so we basically need a Season 2 to get any kind of closure, but I can’t say I think a second season would be good for Star Wars as a whole).  In any case, she takes her concerns to this fuzzy fella, and I just can’t wait for Leslye Headland and crew to “deconstruct” Yoda some more. What Star Wars needs more of is a corrupt Yoda who helps coverup Jedi crimes and frames dead Jedi Masters for things they didn’t actually do. Fun!... If we do get a Season 2 and this story does lead to explaining Anakin’s origins, I’ll be pretty annoyed. I’ve been discussing this a lot lately, but I just don’t think we need to explain everything. We don’t need origin stories for everything. Or backstories. We don’t need to fill in all the details. We don’t need midichlorians. We don’t need to show so much of the Jedi to the point they’re no longer cool or mysterious.  Finally, I’m incredibly letdown by the big emotional apex of this episode. When Osha kills Sol—because she’s apparently so powerful she can kill a Jedi Master with ease—she has next to no expression on her face. It’s basically the one expression Mae and Osha wear on their faces throughout the entire show, unchanging. I hate to say this, but it’s just not great acting.   We needed her to be seething with hatred at this point. We needed her to rage, to drip her hatred all over the ground, to become hate itself, ruinous and feral. Instead, she sort of looks like she’s concentrating hard, but not even that hard. Many of this show’s problems come down to the script and direction, but this moment really showed how lacking some of the acting has been also. You can get away with a good script and bad acting or good acting and a bad script but both? That’s a problem...
The Jedi on Brendok look like LARPers. They’re just goofy. Vernestra tells them to set up a perimeter but then they all just follow Bazil instead. Okay dummies.
The one Senator who came to Vernestra to tell her he mistrusts the Jedi Order makes a lot of sense given how utterly awful the Jedi are in this show, but this just perpetuates one of the biggest mistakes the House of Mouse has made since acquiring Lucasfilm: Making the Jedi suck. This is not how you sell cool Star Wars toys, Bob Iger...
I alluded to this above, but who is this show actually for exactly? It’s not smart or adult enough to be Star Wars For Grownups the way Andor is. But it’s not fun or upbeat enough to be Star Wars For Kids. So then who is it for? Consultants? People who have a sort of vague appreciation of Star Wars ever since they caught Rise Of Skywalker on at a friend’s dorm room shindig? I just don’t know who this is for. Not dads and not kids, and frankly those are the two big demographics when it comes to Star Wars, no matter how you spin things...
Why couldn’t Mae just go with Qimir and Osha? Wouldn’t that be an easier solution than wiping her memory and allowing the Jedi to capture her? What if they manage to restore her memory?
Another point I’m curious about. If we’re supposed to sympathize with the Sith, does that mean we ought to sympathize with the product of the Sith lords’ long centuries of planning? The Galactic Empire is the end-result of everything the Sith stand for, and it’s a direct analogue for fascism in our world right down to the Nazi uniforms. I thought The Acolyte was supposed to be some paean to progressivism, but now I’m wondering if I’ve just been missing the alt-right subtext"
Self-defense is evil and contemptible, because good guys aren't allowed to defend themselves if people could get hurt. Which is left wing logic they apply in the real world, after all. The good guys are actually bad and the bad guys are actually good

‘The Acolyte’ Season 2? The Good News And Bad News - "we have a number of third party analytics firms estimating that The Acolyte is likely the lowest-viewed Star Wars show Disney has produced, below even Andor, which was the least-watched before this"
Clearly, review bombing is the reason why audience ratings are low

Why ‘The Acolyte’ Season 2 Looks Increasingly Unlikely - "Estimates of the cost of The Acolyte put it at $180 million for what are effectively eight, thirty minute episodes. That’s an absolutely wild amount of money for a Star Wars thing that is nowhere near theaters, but rather the sixth Disney live-action Star Wars series instead. And while I think the show has a solid aesthetic, no, it does not look like a $180 million production, and you have to wonder where much of that money went.   Then there’s viewership, where if it was a breakout smash hit, it might be worth spending that for another season. But it’s just not there, based on what we know. Disney does not give out official numbers but Nielsen says its premiere was half the viewership of Ahsoka and 75% lower than The Mandalorian. Reportedly, it’s the second-least watched show, also behind The Book of Boba Fett and Obi-Wan. I cannot imagine it surged in popularity from there."
From a supporter of the show, no less. When I read this article he hadn't given his thoughts on the shit finale, which was the worst episode of a mediocre show

The Acolyte Fans are Confused at [SPOILER] Switching Sides in the Finale - "Despite Sol seemingly trying to get his point across to Mae on why he had to bring her and her twin sister Osha to the council, the former decides to make her timely escape by stealing one of the ships on board.  On Sol's attempt to get Mae back on the main ride, he ends up tempted to shoot down her ship. This is when Bazil is shown agitated in the background.  He opens up the engine's system to hack into Sol's drive and then sabotages the ship's missiles. Even the Jedi Master is dumbfounded in his seat. So, what gives?  Generally speaking, it was uncharacteristic to see Bazil switch sides when all The Acolyte has been showing is that he is a part of the Jedi team.  When he knew it wasn't Osha who boarded with Sol, he kept her away from stealing or manipulating anything from their place."

Meme - "Watching The Acolyte for the plot. The plot:
EPISODE 4 *Jedi fighting*
EPISODE 5 *Masked Manny Jacinto*
EPISODE 5 *Manny Jacinto fighting*
EPISODE 6 *Topless Manny Jacinto*"

Meme - Paul Tassi @PaulTassi: "I don't care what anyone says. The last three episodes of this have established it as an incredibly solid piece of Star Wars content that absolutely is going to need a second season"
"@realswtheory said it's worse than the last Jedi"
Paul Tassi @PaulTassi: "cool he's an idiot"
StarWarsTheory: "I'm an idiot because I don't like a show? Please tell me more about how inclusive and tolerant you are."
Insulting people who disagree with you doesn't make you "toxic" - only refusing to simp for a big corporation does

Meme - Rachel Leishman @RachelLeishman: "Ohhhhhh Star Wars Theory decided to do a "reaction" video to my interview because if he isn't fucking gritting off of Star Wars, he's gifting off of women and sending his minions after them. Fuck off and go build some faulty lightsabers while crying on camera.
to be clear: I really don't give a fuck. anyone who resorts to calling a woman a "cow" because of a star wars show is literally pathetic. I just didn't understand why i've had to delete 100s of comments all of the sudden and it's because of this jagoff"
Johnny @JGColtsfan28: "He did not call you anything stop lying. And if people are harassing you, that's not ok. However, Theory has been diligent in literally every episode he has talked about the show telling his followers to be civil and respectful when they voice their opinions. He's not the problem"
John A. Douglas @BlkCrownAuthor: "She didn't even watch it to verify"
John Acevedo WY @johnnyjohrj...: "Did Theory diss you or insult you in any way in his video?"
Rachel Leishman @RachelLeishman: "I mean this with the utmost respect: do you think I watched that shit? All his "fans" have been leaving incredibly gross comments on my interview because of that he said so"

Meme - Celestial Gardevoir: "Disney Star Wars has confirmed that Lightsabers turn red if their user is filled with too many negative emotions. Like mood rings. So like....Anakin betraying the Jedi, killing Younglings, choking his pregnant wife and fighting Obi-Wan was all done gleefully i guess? ~Nation"
Jerry Dalton: "Just look at the raw rage, hate, fear and pure passion on her face. The storm of emotion swirling into explosive power. As she blankly stares at her weapon turning red. Cinematic"

Meme - Mae: "You killed my mother"
Sol: "Mae, you literally started a fire, the witches had their weapons drawn on us, and your mother was turning into a ghost demon! I striked her out of pure instinct! I thought she was trying to kill us and I feared for your safety. We never intended for things to end like that. All we wanted was a peaceful resolution, but the witches became hostile and made the situation worse! Still, I know I made a mistake, but that doesn't mean you can go on murder spree!"
Joseph Michael Terracina: "Don't forget, the lesbian space witch could have said at the very beginning that Osha could go with them rather than letting a situation escalate."

Why The Acolyte is the WORST of Star Wars | Video Essay - YouTube - "I even had people on my last video of The Acolyte say that I'm ruining this show for myself because I'm thinking about it too much like literally saying don't use your brain just sit there and consume otherwise it's your fault... Mae is a terribly written character and makes no sense. Her actions are just completely unjustifiable half the time. She changes her entire world philosophy on a moment's notice, like literally throws her life mission away when she betrays Qimir in episode 4 which was abrupt and dumb as hell in of itself but then backflips on that betrayal 10 minutes later by fighting the Jedi that she'd said she'd surrendered to and then she becomes bad again going undercover as her sister but then becomes good again because the script says so because Osha needs to be the bad one now... how almost every single character can be so poorly written is honestly impressive...  in the early episodes I was really enjoying the character of Sol but by the end I was just left scratching my head. This dude is crazy obsessed with Osha and it's never really explained beyond: I feel a connection... Osha kills Sol after he confesses to her that he killed her mother but instead of seeking any form of answer as to why, you know pretty important stuff, you'd think, Osha just chokes out the dude who was a father figure to her instead of you know asking one simple question that would have provided necessary context... Sol is dead just so we can pin everything on him so the Ki-Adi Mundi line in the Phantom Menace can somehow make a little bit of sense but oh wait it doesn't because Vernestra is seemingly about to tell Yoda all about it in the final shot of the show. It's just a complete disaster at this point... Bazil the little beaver thing cuts the chase off so Sol can't pursue Mae. Why he did this I have no idea. I have watched it back several times and it still doesn't make sense. There is literally no answer. There's barely even a slightly logical interpretation. This little rat thing pulls the wires out to stop the chase because reasons. The script says so. You could at least try and bullshit a reason but no... Qimir pretty much kills everyone that Osha knows and is friends with... within like legitimately one day she's standing on a beach with him basically holding hands after killing her father figure. Are we serious? Do we just not want to give these characters time to develop? Is is it that hard to do? Is it not deemed necessary by these writers? This is like Rey going from nobody to whooping everyone's ass in less than a week. The common denominator here is writing. Character arcs need time to develop especially when they are as drastic as what this show is trying to pull off. That's one of the perks of a TV show. You actually get the time to develop the characters... There is nothing here that warrants Torbin swearing a vow of silence and taking his own life. Like he swears silence and takes his own life because he got a little homesick and a Jedi he was with killed the evil witch lady that was disintegrating a child. Like what. Not to mention Aniseya's line after Sol stabs her is the biggest gaslighting moment I've ever seen... this show's story structure is all over the place. You begin as a murder mystery but basically all the characters are killed off around halfway through the show despite the fact we don't really know who they are at all. And in the third episode you introduce a perspective flashback that conveniently leaves key pieces of information out for no logical reason other than hiding the rest of the edit so you can reveal it later. And then in the penultimate episode you essentially retell the third episode again but with the parts you left out and provide answers that don't justify the actions we've seen from the characters prior. And then you spend the last episode attempting to wrap up the twin plot and actually give Osha something to do finally despite her literally being a passenger in a story in which it tries to revolve around her and her sister... it changed from episode to episode making the show feel like a disconnected blend of whatever the writers were feeling on that specific day and I think that's one of the biggest problems with this show. It tries to do a lot but excels at nothing... the twins offer nothing but problems in this show. It doesn't help that the actress playing these twins was really really bad. There's a lot of bad acting in this show in general to be honest but at least it might have had a little bit of focus as a result of dropping the twins out of the story... this show had 10 writers across its 8 episodes and it all just started to make sense. This show was one person's vision split across 10 writers varying from episode to episode. It's no wonder why this show feels all over the place... more often than not Star Wars has become a cameo simulator. Something that helps patch over the gaping cracks that is modern Star Wars writing... it's people like this that are the reason why Disney think they can keep serving up this slop and get away with it. Because they don't have standards. Because one cameo can erase all the bad writing that made the show suck in the first place...  notice how every single scene in the Jedi Temple is claustrophobic. No big sweeping wides, nothing. Every single shot is so contained and so claustrophobic. Compare that to the prequels and you'll notice a massive difference. They've shot these Jedi Temple, seems like they have no budget at all and I just ask why where did this money go? Say what you want about the prequels but at least you got a sense of the scale of the world and I think the Jedi Temple is a perfect comparison of why this is a problem. In The Acolyte you don't feel the money being pumped into this show...  there were moments where I was like, okay you've actually got a cool idea here, challenging the Jedi as being flawed. But you stop and realize and it's like wait we've already done this. Did you watch the prequels? Like who is this show? For what characters are we rooting for? It's not like it delivers on the profound nature of confusing the viewer on who the good guys are and who the bad guys are and where does it begin and end? Because the writing isn't smart enough to pull that kind of thing off... I wanted to like this show but this show is everything wrong with Star Wars and a whole new low for Star Wars under Disney"

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Latest posts (which you might not see on this page)

powered by Blogger | WordPress by Newwpthemes