HUNTER: CBC frets that UK teen's murder fueling 'far right' | Toronto Sun - "CBC News is trembling with rage and fear that “Britain’s far right” is attempting to stoke a battle over race in the country’s latest criminal outrage. The network expressed no such fears about “America’s far left” exploiting the death of George Floyd... Naturally, CBC unearthed a tweedy academic — who’s even Canadian, son of a gun! — who shared the reporter’s disdain for “white grievance.” “What you’ve seen … is a long-term ‘white grievance’ narrative that has really penetrated politics here,” said Aaron Winter, sociologist at Lancaster University who researches the “far right” and racism. Winter doesn’t think “far right” politicians give a fig about Nowak. CBC laps this up like a kitten with a saucer of cream. But the academic and CBC have missed one of the greatest maxims ever put to paper that I have cited often. It comes courtesy of John Steinbeck in his masterpiece, The Grapes of Wrath. That is that we must always, always know the difference between results and causes. Outrage is merely the result. The cause is a young man mortally wounded and then handcuffed because his killer lied and claimed he said something racist. The cause is thousands of girls gang-raped and tortured while the great and the good turned a blind eye... That young man’s murder was a tragedy, police actions a disgrace. But the CBC’s main concern being that his death would fuel the so-called “far right” is wildly loopy. But it’s also what we’ve come to expect."
This is why left wingers love CBC so much. If you believe in CBC media bias, you're a far right Maple MAGA who hates Canada
Basil the Great on X - "🚨BREAKING: SPECIALIST DOCTOR SAYS HENRY NOWAK COULD HAVE LIVED IF NOT FOR POLICE
In summary:
- Henry was alive when they arrived and likely clotted
- Aggressive police intervention likely tore clot
- Major Trauma department was minutes away from scene
- Judge and Pathologist were FAR TOO LENIENT on Police
- Henry Nowak had 50% CHANCE to survive
- Absolutely convinced that if he arrived in hospital alive he would have survived
This is disgusting, the family deserve justice Full breakdown below:
Dr Krzysztof Magier [@DrMagier ] based in the Isle of Wight is a qualified Paediatric Care Lead and part of the 'Critical Care Network' with experience in combat medicine training and a specialized course in treating severe injuries (including gunshot and stab wounds) has analysed the footage and claimed the AGGRESSIVE Police intervention may have contributed towards Henry's death. Dr Magier DISAGREES with the pathologist's and judge's opinion that Henry Nowak had ZERO chance of SURVIVAL. As well as the claim that handcuffing him essentially changed NOTHING. In fact he claims the REVERSE IS TRUE, there is a high likelihood that the police intervention CONTRIBUTED TO HENRY'S DEATH. He analysed the autopsy report, which points to DAMAGE to the subclavian vein as the main source of BLEEDING. In a healthy person, venous bleeding occurs under low pressure and often self-limits thanks to the NATURALLY FORMING CLOT, while simply approximating the wound edges and compressing the surrounding tissues closes the vein enough to slow or even stop the bleeding. The body camera footage shows that when police arrived on the scene (likely 5-10 minutes after the injury), Henry was CONCIOUS ENOUGH to speak LOUDLY. He was therefore NOT YET in a terminal state. After his arms were twisted behind his back and handcuffed, the vein was most likely STRETCHED, the clot TORN, and BLEEDING DRAMATICALLY INTENSIFIED. Within just about three minutes, he lost consciousness and DIED. People with suspected internal injuries should NEVER be moved or yanked abruptly, such actions can destroy the natural clot and lead to massive internal hemorrhage. Instead of immediately calling a medical rescue team and handing the patient over to paramedics, the police ARRESTED HIM. If paramedics had arrived first on the scene, Henry’s chances of survival would have been MUCH HIGHER. AS HIGH AS "50%"—writes Dr. Magier. Paramedics could have quickly started an IV, administered fluids to increase circulating blood volume, and tranexamic acid to stabilize the clot, and if needed, performed needle decompression (inserting a large, long needle into the lung), because the issue wasn’t so much lack of lung function, but compression of the blood-filled lung on the heart and mediastinum, which blocks circulation. Worse still, the incident took place just a few minutes' drive by car (2–3 minutes by ambulance with sirens) from Southampton University Hospital—a regional MAJOR TRAUMA CENTRE equipped with a full team of specialists, procedures, and equipment. "I AM CONVINCED THAT IF HENRY HAD ARRIVED THERE ALIVE THE DOCTORS WOULD HAVE NOT LET HIM DIE"—writes Dr. Magier. The aggressive police intervention, instead of saving a life, led to death through improper handling of a severely injured person, even though world-class care was just minutes away. "I fear the Judge and pathologist were too lenient toward the police""
Dr Krzysztof Magier 🇵🇱 on X - "Not only myself, but also coroner has serious doubts about Police role in Henry's death and ordered a full inquest into circumstances of the death. This inquest will give much more answers. @delestoile @britishpoles"
Henry Nowak inquest to examine if police action contributed to his death
It’s little wonder many white Britons feel like strangers in their own land - "He was a victim of our country’s perverse discrimination against white British people, now rapidly becoming second-class citizens. The Prime Minister told us that a two-tier policing doesn’t exist but that is simply not true. Remember the Sentencing Guidance that treated “BAME people” less harshly than their white counterparts? Or the Manchester Arena bombing where a security guard feared being branded as a racist and failed to report the attacker? Or the man who murdered three people in Nottinghamshire not being sectioned because he was black? Many white people not only feel like strangers in their own land, they feel like this country no longer belongs, or works for them. We have built a country that educates us to hate white people. For more than two decades, Britain has been moving away from the principle that people should be treated equally as individuals and towards a system that categorises people according to race, ethnicity, sexuality and identity. That shift has not happened by accident. It has been driven by a legal and bureaucratic framework that encourages public bodies to think in group identities rather than individual rights. The root of the DEI crisis is the Equality Act 2010. Passed in the dying days of the Labour government, the act has become the legal foundation upon which modern DEI culture has been built. The Public Sector Equality Duty, legitimised race-based policymaking and equality impact assessments that dominate public life today all flow from it. What began as an attempt to prevent discrimination against minority groups has evolved into prejudice against the majority. What started as anti-racism has now become racism. All sanctioned by the law. That is why Reform UK believes the act should be scrapped... Henry Nowak should still be alive today. Nothing can change that terrible fact, but if his death forces Britain to ask serious questions about identity politics and what fairness means, then perhaps some good can emerge from an otherwise unspeakable tragedy. Because equality should mean equality for everyone."
Police use taxpayer money to hire £75k diversity officers while crime soars - "Serving officers suggested police staff were now so terrified of career-ending accusations of racism that they would rather bungle a murder investigation than fall foul of diversity guidelines. But there is no sign of the diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) jobs boom slowing down."
As a white man, I would love to know exactly how I should react to Henry's murder - "I’m embarrassed at being a man, ashamed of being white. I know I am responsible for every evil since time began. I watched the events to mark D-Day this weekend and thought: “Why did we even bother?” given that the British Empire “lasted longer” and “did more damage” than the Nazis (according to academic Kehinde Andrews). Happily, the English, with their castles and plantations, ceased to exist in 1945, when we became a multicultural kingdom of good manners – always putting others first. When many saw Henry Nowak struggling to breathe, they would not have thought “that could be my son” but rather, “I hope this won’t harm community relations”. We retain, despite our obliteration of historical identity, a stiff upper lip. The Prime Minister, whose very soul is starched, reminded us after the killing that “we don’t do rage”. Indeed, it might be helpful if the Government sent a leaflet to every home in Britain suggesting how we should feel when we see a dying child being handcuffed, ranging from anxious to irritated to mildly annoyed, along with healthy physical alternatives to a riot. Go jogging. Put up a shelf. I’m campaigning for outdoor zones to be established for those who insist on being angry, much as we do for smoking. That way, Nigel Farage can vent to himself outside the office, drenched in rain. On the whole, then, I’m pretty serene. Still taking the tablets! But as I try to go to sleep, counting the many ways diversity has made me stronger, it’s the contradictions that keep me awake. I understand that we’re all equal now, and I’m thrilled about that, but why do the reactions to some deaths seem more equal than others? JD Vance has been told he mustn’t comment on British policing, yet when George Floyd died in the United States in 2020, Keir Starmer not only expressed “shock and anger”, he told the Government to communicate our national “abhorrence” to Donald Trump. The Tories refused. Lisa Nandy called them “weak and wrong”. Police chiefs were also “appalled and horrified”, promising “justice and accountability”. A structural review of the Met concluded that “neutrality” in policing was a “false ideal” when the “norm” was “whiteness”. Britain thus rewrote its approach to policing in response to the death of an American, as coppers and MPs fell to their knees like ninepins. David Lammy says he wouldn’t use the gesture today. Henry’s death led to just one riot in Southampton. Within one week, Floyd’s death had triggered protests in around 140 US cities. Most were peaceful, but property was destroyed, and thousands were arrested. Looting, argued an article in the Harvard Political Review, can be “a challenge to the violence of racial capitalism” and “an alternative and accelerated path to justice”. The British defied lockdown rules to stage their own protests and tossed a racist statue into the sea – a crime for which a jury refused to convict and which led to a debate about public art so paranoid that a statue of Baden-Powell required 24-hour security. In Canada, a nation so nice it had to dig very deep to find a reason to hate itself, when horrific radar evidence of mass graves of indigenous people under church land prompted similar claims of historical trauma. Churches were mysteriously vandalised and burned down, and though Justin Trudeau, the then prime minister, denounced the arson, he described anger towards the Catholic Church as “understandable”. Anger over what happened in the US or Canada is cast as legitimate, which it is, and channelled into services, commissions, school curricula, yet for Henry, we must be reason personified, a test of national sang-froid. As I say, I want to be a good liberal, but the rules change so fast they’re hard to follow, and I can’t see why, when one group riots, the demonstration is complex but basically sympathetic (“they’re probably right”), yet when another group gathers outside Southampton police station, they are just a bunch of thugs. For them, no empathy. They’ve read too much Elon Musk. Lines of causation are drawn between Nigel Farage articulating “pure, cold rage” and grifters throwing bins – a butterfly lights a Benson and Japan burns – and, because one does not want Tommy Robinson on one’s hands, Middle England is persuaded to go quiet. We’ll let this one pass. After all, didn’t Henry’s father make a plea against “division, hatred or tension”? True... but he said some other things, too. Liberals claim rising crime is a right-wing fantasy. Mark Nowak called knife crime a “national emergency”. Officials have stressed the complexity of the crime scene. Mr Nowak said, “The truth is much simpler”, that while his son was “degraded... his murderer was afforded decency”. In other words, a double standard was applied – now tripled, I’d wager, by the attempt to suppress the same anguish about Henry that was encouraged about Floyd. It’s the two-tier policing of people’s emotions. What I truly don’t understand is that I found Floyd’s death revolting, too. That crime scene was also “complicated” – he had taken fentanyl – but nothing excuses a cop kneeling on a man’s neck for more than nine minutes, and the context was a history of police brutality in a country rife with discrimination. African-Americans are 13 per cent of the population, yet account for over one-third of the US prison population. To fix that, goes the argument, we have to handle non-white suspects differently – OK. But this creates the paradox of equal ends being pursued by unequal means, and it risks alienating a majority population tired of being spoken of like psychotics, oppressors, would-be harassers, products of a racist original sin squatting in the Garden of England and hissing anyone who doesn’t fit in. Treat people like this, and there’s a greater likelihood they’ll act like it. It is the attempt to elide the grim facts of the Nowak case that is ultimately divisive, not the honest expression of rage."
The toxic consequences of social justice dogma are finally exposed - "As Henry Nowak lay dying of stab wounds inflicted by Vickrum Digwa, the terrible, stifling and wholly predictable teachings of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) came to life, squawking with terrible glee. Knowing full well how much leverage there is in Britain in crying racism, Digwa did just that. The Nowak murder is many things: disgusting, yowling abuse of all that is precious about our liberal democracy, a mockery of Enlightenment values and a human tragedy with the resonance of an Euripides play. Britain’s zeal for DEI training is pinned to the broader framework known as intersectionality, the defining social idea of the contemporary Anglosphere. Intersectionality says that the more “marginalised” identities you can claim, the more power you deserve. So by this logic Nowak deserved little sympathy. But it is not just white men who are relegated to the bottom of the solidarity pile. Within intersectionality’s horrible pincer, Jews, despite being the West’s most persecuted minority, were always going to be squashed. If you are drilled in the tenets of intersectionality/DEI/social justice (it’s all the same), Islamo-Leftist anti-Semitic propaganda will sound about right to you. For the far Right, we are not nearly white enough, but for the far Left, the Jew is an ultra-white avatar for Israel. Not only are we white (even when we aren’t) but we are symbols of all that is racist, imperial, settler-colonial, apartheid-loving, genocidal, rich, powerful, conniving, string-pulling, and endlessly self-pitying... Anti-whiteness and anti-Semitism have long been intermingled. The American civil rights movement of the 1960s saw collaboration between Jews, who were mostly Democrats, and activist African Americans. Jews, whose European brethren were so fresh from almost-total annihilation just 20 years before, wanted to do their best to help bring freedom and dignity to their black countrymen. But at the same time, and to the dismay of Dr Martin Luther King and his ilk, movements like Black Power emerged, advocating militant self-defence and the seizure by force of educational institutions and businesses serving black people. Jews were very explicitly identified within Black Power as objects of fear and loathing, and architects of white supremacy and evil capitalism. By the 1970s, the civil rights movement had splintered into other causes, including feminism and gay rights. Feminism in particular embraced anti-racism and anti-Zionism. And bad ideas, emanating mostly from France, piled in. The “posts” – postcolonialism, postmodernism, poststructuralism – became catechism among everyone with a Lefty or academic bone in their body... In the 1970s, Irish Republicans began embracing the Palestinian cause, right down to the terrorism training they conducted with the PLO from 1975. Culturally it’s not hard to see where Hezbollah-praising band Kneecap, “genocide”-obsessed rockers Fontaines DC or Gaza-obsessed author Sally Rooney, come from... Let us hope that Nowak’s fate, and that of the Jews murdered at synagogue and stabbed in the street in broad daylight by Muslim men while the great and the good insist that the real problem is Islamophobia, mark a turning point."
Stop virtue signalling and start protecting the public, Philp tells Hampshire police - "Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, has told Hampshire police to concentrate on “protecting the public” rather than “divisive posturing” amid growing national anger in the aftermath of Mr Nowak’s murder... a former leader of Hampshire police’s Black and Minority Ethnic Network (BEAM) had poured scorn on concerns that police in Britain were too focused on diversity. Det Insp Kimberley Bownes, who was co-chair of the network between 2022 and 2025, criticised former police officer Mike Neville on social media for having “outdated views”. In an interview with ITV’s Good Morning Britain in 2022, Mr Neville cautioned that police had “lost focus” on solving burglaries because of their preoccupation with inclusion training. He told the programme that diversity training should “be scrapped” and that “woke nonsense” was to blame for increasing levels of unsolved crime. In response, Ms Bownes wrote: “My gosh, another retired cop with their outdated views given airtime”. She has since deleted her social media profiles on LinkedIn and X. Ms Bownes also previously endorsed the police’s race action plan in her capacity as the constabulary’s BEAM co-chair. In the wake of Mr Nowak’s killing, new questions are being asked over whether the guidance – published following the murder of George Floyd in the United States – is fit for purpose. The criticism centres on a line in the guidance, issued by the National Police Chief’s Council, which states that race equality does not mean “treating everyone the same or being colourblind”. Addressing the plan in 2022 on the force’s website, Ms Bownes described it as “a positive step towards tackling racism and discrimination within policing”... In 2020, following the murder of George Floyd, Hampshire police shared a post on X stating it was “appalled” by his death. No similar comment has been posted since the killing of Mr Nowak. In 2013 the force organised an internship programme only available to applicants from black and minority ethnic backgrounds. By 2020 it had introduced recruitment adverts that – though technically open to all – were specifically targeted at people from diverse backgrounds... Potential recruits are promised that once hired they will be offered additional “coaching”, “mentoring”, and “one-to-one guidance for internal interview processes”, only available for black and minority ethnic staff members. Harry Miller, a former police officer and a spokesman for policing watchdog Fair Cop, said: “Police, and particularly Hampshire police, have entirely lost their way. “They see themselves as social architects rather than simply upholders of the law. “If you want to be a social architect, become a politician, don’t be a police officer.” He added: “In the case of Henry Nowak, police immediately prioritised an accusation of racism over preserving a life. “That is as a direct result of the training that they’ve had, where their humanity and common sense has been squeezed out of them.”"
White guilt is a pathology that afflicts the West. Henry Nowak is its latest victim - "How exactly did this metaphysical doctrine of original sin, or universal guilt, become so entrenched in what is assumed to be a scientifically rational, secular society? That is too big a question to take on here, but perhaps it is worth considering that the absence of religion, with its acceptance of human imperfection and the need for atonement, might have produced a vacuum that needed to be filled. At any rate, here we are. The take over of our public institutions by this perverse ideology has arrived at what now seems clearly to have been its inevitable conclusion. The presumptions of innocence and guilt that are attached to racial identity by official government policy have culminated in the hideous death of an innocent young man... This does remind me of the revolutionary Left’s tactic designed to destroy faith in Western democracy by making it behave in blatantly repressive ways."
As Richard Dawkins observed, the retreat of Christianity has opened the way to worse
Scotland Yard captured by ‘woke mind virus’, says ex Met Federation boss - "Scotland Yard has been captured by the “woke mind virus” and no longer treats citizens equally under the law, a veteran police officer has claimed. Rick Prior, the former chairman of the Metropolitan Police Federation, said the force had prioritised equalising outcomes among different ethnic groups over ensuring equality of opportunity for more than a decade. He said this had led to a loss of skills in the force and had affected the policing of London’s streets. He also claimed the force had rejected his suggestions that officers should be banned from wearing political symbols, such as rainbow lanyards representing the LGBT community, after he was invited to draw up new guidelines on Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) last summer... “It has been clear to me that for more than a decade, the Met has been pursuing equity of outcome between ethnic groups rather than equality of opportunity and equal treatment under the law. I have seen it in the forced rotation of skilled firearms officers to manufacture ‘churn’ and diversify armed policing, at great cost in lost skills. “I saw it in 2022, when two very senior officers were found by a tribunal to have racially discriminated against a white inspector, by removing him from a promotion process and inserting a less qualified black candidate instead.” Mr Prior added that after the death of George Floyd in 2020 in the United States, the ideology of pursuing equal outcomes had “shifted from policy backrooms to operational policing through the London Race Action Plan”. He continued: “Even worse is the national Police Anti-Racism Commitment issued in March last year, a smoking gun of two-tier policing, which baldly states that its goal of ‘producing equality of policing outcomes … does not mean treating everyone the same’ or being ‘colourblind’. “I have seen this logic in action. One very senior officer told me the Met had what she termed a ‘disproportionality matrix’: a system to assess which ‘low-level’ crimes are likely to bring the Met disproportionately into conflict with the black community if it seeks to enforce the law.”... [He] had recommended the force “ensure fair treatment and dignity for all”. His claims have emerged days after Lord Mann, the Government’s anti-Semitism adviser, recommended a similar ban for staff in the NHS. Last year, the High Court ruled that a police force had failed to act impartially when it allowed officers to take part in a Gay Pride and transgender rights march. Mr Justice Linden found that Northumbria Police was wrong to have allowed its officers to participate in an event some might perceive as a political protest... Mr Prior also called for free speech to be protected within legal boundaries. The former federation chairman, who spent 29 years serving the Metropolitan Police, claimed that after presenting the document to senior management, he had been quietly moved to another department and the document was shelved... he was suspended and subsequently sacked after warning that his members were becoming increasingly wary of dealing with people from ethnic minorities for fear of accusations of racism. The High Court later ruled his treatment had been unlawful and a breach of his right to free speech under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights... Zia Yusuf, Reform UK’s spokesman for home affairs, said: “The fact is that two-tier policing is now rampant in Britain. “Anti-white prejudice is structurally embedded into policing. We already know the Race Action Plan instructs the police not to treat people equally. “This is a watershed moment as more whistleblowers like this come forward to confirm the obvious: Britain’s policing DEI has created two-tier policing.” The FSU report, which will be published this week, claims that a “doctrine that openly rejects treating people equally now governs policing”."
If the police catch a black man with a knife, should they refuse to arrest him? - "officers have long learnt to keep their mouths shut and their eye-rolls subtle when being lectured to on ideas that are far-divorced from the reality of policing the streets... We’ve already heard the former director of policing’s diversity scheme say she wanted officers to fix racism across society. Another mad idea you might think, except we’ve seen all manner of hare-brained ideas that fit with this objective. There was the chief superintendent in the Met who in 2022 openly stated his desire for the police to set up schemes to “siphon off” millions from businesses to fund “minority-owned businesses”. And the British Transport Police set up a £75,000 law scholarship that’s only open to black students. We’ve even learnt this week that Sussex Police created a book club for senior officers to discover and dismantle their inner white supremacy – even as business owners in Sussex are forced to close their shops due to rampant crime. The body-worn video of police officers arresting Henry Nowak – as he lay stabbed and struggling to breathe – has shone the fiercest of light on the state of policing in Britain today, but so far there’s no sign that senior officers get what is obvious to the public and most officers. Instead of accepting their grave error in embracing a dangerous and pernicious ideology, police chiefs have merely said they will, “where needed”, “make changes” to the race action plan. The Government’s response has been no better, with a source close to the Home Secretary saying the wording in the document is simply “clumsy”. And the Independent Office for Police Conduct and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary are as up to their necks in the ideology of anti-racism as the forces they are charged with investigating and inspecting. To give an example of just how tainted the IOPC is on this – in their own investigations they have routinely presented the previous stop and search history of police officers in a desperate bid to suggest that any racial disparities can only be evidence of an officer’s racism. The impossibility of what Britain’s most hare-brained chiefs and senior staff wanted to achieve should be grounds for their dismissal. But more importantly we must also now ask the serious question of how such madness can be banished from our institutions once and for all."
Let this be a George Floyd moment for the police - "When I joined the police, one principle that was drummed into us from day one: our first duty is to protect life – and one of the most valuable legacies of the Macpherson inquiry into the racist murder of Stephen Lawrence was the recognition that police first-aid training needed to improve dramatically. Thanks to this valuable lesson, when my colleagues and I came across a chaotic mob and a young man lying on a filthy South London pavement at the foot of a tower block, it was clear what needed doing. We were trained to strip away clothing, identify wounds and get medical assistance moving as quickly as possible. Yet in the years since we’ve seen British policing’s leaders increasingly drift from a focus on the basics of policing. They have preferred to embrace the more contested aspects of the Macpherson inquiry’s conclusions. We’ve even seen some chief constables step forward and – almost with pride – declare their force to be institutionally racist. We’ve seen police forces found to have discriminated against white officers going for promotion and against white applicants hoping to become police officers. We’ve seen police use taxpayer funds to commission a 126-page report on “whiteness”. We’ve seen British police chiefs take the knee and embrace the dangerous and divisive ideology of critical race theory in response to the death of a black man – George Floyd – many thousands of miles away, in a different country on a different continent. The most progressive and activist officers were so quick to embrace the moment that you’d think it had occurred on their own doorstep at the hands of their own officers. A national police race action plan soon metastasised into every force in the country creating its own flavour – seemingly intent on outdoing each other. We’ve even seen a British police force fund and launch a £75,000 law degree scholarship that is only open to black students – and in Hampshire, like so many forces, precious training time for officers and staff has been diverted toward ideologically motivated race training in the name of George Floyd. Will there be any such activity or effort in the name of Henry Nowak? To revisit the callous words of the arresting officer, “I don’t think so mate.” We’ve seen with the Nottingham inquiry into the murderous attacks that took the lives of Barnaby Webber, Grace O’Malley-Kumar and Ian Coates – and seriously wounded others – just how deficient, deflective and unforthcoming many of our public authorities are. We’ve also seen police officers thrown under the bus for doing even the simplest of jobs – like investigating fare evasion on a Croydon bus or protecting themselves and the public from gangsters like Chris Kaba – seemingly because self-serving elites aren’t prepared to risk having their careers limited by even the most spurious accusations of racism. It’s increasingly clear to many of us in Britain that policing has surrendered to the extreme, divisive and dangerous politics of racist progressivism masquerading as “anti-racism”. While the Independent Office for Police Conduct may be investigating the actions of officers in relation to Henry Nowak, only a public inquiry will deliver the detailed and fearless examination required to understand the full chain of events that culminated in Henry’s murder. If Henry wasn’t white, it might well have been announced already."
Sikh leader compares Nowak backlash to 1984 Amritsar massacre - "A Sikh leader has compared the backlash over Henry Nowak’s murder to a massacre in India, which left hundreds of people dead. Dabinderjit Singh, a senior executive at the Sikh Foundation, said attacks on followers of the faith had taken place “up and down the country” every day since Vickrum Digwa was sentenced for the 18-year-old’s murder... Mr Singh, who previously served as a director at the National Audit Office (NAO), has been described as a long-standing campaigner for the creation of a sovereign Sikh state. In 2021, Sir Keir, then leader of the Opposition, ditched plans to give him a peerage. The Daily Mail reported at the time that it was because of his alleged extremist links. Previous reports claimed he had been a member of the International Sikh Youth Federation (ISYF), which was proscribed as a terrorist organisation in 2001 following Home Office warnings that its members were a threat to national security."
Clearly, Sikhs are the true victims of Nowak's murder
