Unrestricted Lawfare - by Kimberly “Kim” Wexler, MA JD - "From behind the shield of commentary Jenin Younes, national legal director for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, incorrectly advised X readers that ICE officers had “no law enforcement authority over” Minneapolis anti-ICE activist Renee Good, and “no authority to search a U.S. citizen or arrest her.”... Younes, a former appellate advocate for indigent criminal defendants in New York state court, prefaced her commentary with her credentials and framed herself as a neutral expert... “It is very clear that the officers instigated the confrontation.” As a trained attorney myself, I was astounded at Younes’ willingness to risk her reputation on such a strange hill without first investigating the facts of what occurred PRIOR TO the scene that emerges from the 9-second video clips. But what’s more astonishing (and frankly shocking) are Younes’ statements of law that are dangerously, absurdly incorrect. In the first wave of commentary about the encounter, many inferred Good was free to leave the scene — despite audio in some clips with the voice of an agent shouting to Good, “get out of the f—— vehicle!” Indeed, Younes bolsters the notion that Good was free to leave by asserting: “a woman surrounded by masked, armed men who have no law enforcement authority over her has every right to try to escape.” But there is no “right to try to escape” or flee a law enforcement encounter simply because one believes the encounter may be unlawful. In fact, resisting or evading a federal officer is a crime, and attempting to evade law enforcement tends to lead to dangerous escalation. The common-sense advice: If someone believes she has been unlawfully stopped or detained by law enforcement, she should cooperate, and then call an attorney later to vindicate her rights via a civil rights action. Under Younes’ view, the claim that ICE officers have “no law enforcement authority over” U.S. citizens suggests that citizens can interfere with ICE operations or commit crimes against ICE agents with impunity. Clearly that is not the case. Contrary to Younes’ assertions, ICE agents in the course of executing their enforcement duties have statutory authority to stop, question, detain and arrest U.S. citizens, codified at 8 U.S. Code § 1357(a)(5). Moreover, federal law criminalizes interfering with a federal officer to hinder the officer’s ability to perform his duties. Aggressive actions, such as physically blocking, shoving, or restraining an officer may bring felony assault charges under 18 U.S. Code § 111 (“Assaulting, resisting or impeding certain officers or employees”). This statute applies to U.S. citizens and non-citizens alike. For example, in April 2024 Carlos Verduzco-Muniz pled guilty to both illegal border entry and felony assault on a Guardsman with the Texas Military Forces and was sentenced to 15 months in prison. U.S. Congresswoman LaMonica McIver was indicted in June 2025 under Section 111 after an incident involving physical interference at an ICE facility in New Jersey. On an oversight visit, McIver (wearing red) was caught on video outside the Delaney Hall detention facility initiating a hostile confrontation with an officer... a federal judge rejected McIver’s legislative immunity argument in the congresswoman’s third motion to dismiss, and the case proceeds to trial. For activists who seek to exercise their First Amendment rights, civil rights attorneys like Younes should advise on the limits of their rights to protest lawfully and on how to protest safely. And they should make it clear that interfering with ICE activities is a federal crime — absolutely outside the bounds of Constitutionally-protected expression. As a fuller picture of the incident emerged, the reason for the presence of the Goods and their SUV on that icy street became clear... statements from Good’s family members and eyewitnesses suggested that Good had coordinated with local activists and was consciously leading or participating in an operation to obstruct ICE by blocking the road with vehicles. “They clearly wanted her out of there because she was the main car leading the protest,” neighbor Emily Heller, who witnessed the fatal shooting, told MPR News. “She was very successful in blocking traffic. She was doing what she set out to do.”... Good had been involved with “ICE watch” activism and that her 6-year-old son attended a private school “dedicated to social justice education.” Cell phone footage released just today reveals Good’s partner verbally taunting the ICE officer who fired the shots to “show your face” and “come at us” just seconds before the fatal incident. Less than three hours after the cell phone footage emerged, Younes pounced. “Conservatives are claiming that new footage from the ICE officer’s phone proves he acted in self-defense. That is not true.” Younes analyzes what she sees in the video: “Good’s wife was being obnoxious and confrontational;” “Good had the steering wheel turned hard to the right, indicative of an attempt to flee, not run over the officer.” But Younes doesn’t ask why Good is stopped in the road, nor why her partner, identified in news reports as Rebecca Good, is outside the SUV being obnoxious. There is no inquiry about WHY Good stomped the gas to initiate an “attempt to flee” — in direct opposition to the officer’s order to “get out of the f—— vehicle!” Younes persists in the mythology that ICE officers have no authority here, and that their presence can be safely ignored and dismissed with a literal wave of the hand: “The woman initially tried to wave them past her.” Based on the evidence I think it’s clear the officer fired in self-defense, but I agree with Younes on one thing: Renee Good should not have died. If Renee had had a proper understanding of the law, and of the dangerousness of putting herself physically between ICE and the execution of their law enforcement duties, might the 37-year-old mom have thought twice before taking part? Was this tragedy foreseeable? Could a mistaken, delusional belief that the law does not apply to her — in someone who adheres zealously to anti-ICE ideology — be the catalyst to radicalize a mom to commit an act of obstruction, or even terrorism? Being in a vehicle may have enhanced the dangerousness compared to anti-ICE activism we saw in 2025, where protestors blocked roads with their bodies. Driving a 2-ton vehicle meant Renee was operating a potentially lethal weapon, justifying lethal force in a self-defense situation... Younes currently works for ADC, a left-leaning Arab-focused civil rights organization closely aligned with the ACLU... In March 2025 ADC issued a statement strongly condemning the “ICE targeting” of Mahmoud Khalil... It’s hard to fathom how the legal director of pro-immigration, anti-deportation ADC can keep a straight face while claiming “no political dog” in the fight. Younes’ anti-law enforcement bias is undeniable. On the morning of January 8, less than 24 hours after the first video clips surfaced, Younes posted about “a phenomenal lawyer who specializes in holding law enforcement accountable for overreach” who was offering to represent Renee Good’s family pro bono. To assert, on the basis of minimal preliminary evidence, that ICE agents must be held accountable for “overreach” is the very definition of prejudice: to hold a preconceived opinion... Do Jenin Younes’ twisting of facts and her profound misstatements of law suggest a new form of “unrestricted lawfare” meant to embolden activists to take risky acts against ICE?"
Curtis Houck on X - "CNN's @BradOnMessage Todd: “It’s a tragedy that Renee Good is dead, and we should all mourn it. We should all mourn it. We also should look back what went wrong the way before that. Peggy Flanagan, the lieutenant governor of Minnesota, encouraged people to put their bodies on the line. That is irresponsible. Democrats who are encouraging people to obstruct law enforcement, they’re putting them in harm’s way with their rhetoric, and it’s wrong. Republicans shouldn’t do it. Democrats shouldn’t do it. We also have a problem that the Minneapolis police are not allowed to participate – to do crowd control. The encounter between Renee Good and those ICE officers shouldn’t have been – shouldn’t have happened. Minneapolis police should have been there as a buffer, but we don’t have it because Minneapolis ordinances prohibit them from even being there when there’s ICE in coordination. We have to change this. We have to have – Kristi Noem said it this morning – state and local officials need to help ICE do their job, not encourage people to stop them.”"
Mark Mendlovitz on X - "The @CivilRights branch of the @TheJusticeDept should be suing Minneapolis and Hennepin County over the non-enforcement of crowd control when ICE is present. The basis is, would the police or sheriff control the crowd in any other situation? If this were say, Kamala Harris at a Presidential campaign rally, and people were violently demonstrating, would the Minneapolis Police or Hennepin County Sheriff's Office intervene? If the answer is yes, then they are openly discriminating against the civil rights of those ICE officers. ICE OFFICERS HAVE CIVIL RIGHTS AND ARE DUE EQUAL PROTECTION, AS THEY PERFORM THEIR JOBS ON BEHALF OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. Sanctuary City policies are only legal up to the point that they do not conflict with federal law or the Constitution. This is a clear conflict in which the 14th Amendment is being selectively suspended by the police and sheriff for ICE officers, when it would not be in any other case. They are not being "equally protected.""
Renee Good killed in ICE protest sparks civil disobedience debate - "There seems to be a bit of confusion in our society of late about what "civil disobedience" is and what it isn’t. Last week, this very confusion got 37-year-old Renee Good killed. Political protest in the form of civil disobedience has a long and very proud tradition, from Mahatma Gandhi nonviolently defying the British in India, to our own Martin Luther King Jr. penning his eloquence from a Birmingham jail cell. There is a stoic dignity to this practice, which in and of itself grants the words of its practitioners a gravity and profound humility. What we are seeing across the country as organized gangs of wine moms use Antifa tactics to harass and impede Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents is not civil disobedience. It isn't even protest. It's just crime. The word "civil" in civil disobedience refers to the fact that the protester is allowing themselves to be arrested in order to emphasize just how important their cause is to them. It is also generally done in a context that threatens minimal harm to police and bystanders. Today, across the country, but especially in bastions of democratic socialism like Minneapolis, Portland and Seattle, we see something entirely different: bands of people following, harassing, doxxing and sometimes engaging in direct assault against ICE agents. What these ICE Watch groups across the country, of which Good was reportedly a trained member, do is entirely different. They are trying to impede federal agents from carrying out democratically enacted laws, not sending a message, and importantly, they are trying to evade capture. Sorry, that is crime, not protest. Further, we need to ask ourselves, quite seriously, if groups of people training and then executing missions that put law enforcement and the public in harm's way may, in fact, be criminal conspiracies. If one’s job is to be a neighborhood lookout for a street drug dealing operation, that is a crime. It's not entirely clear why doing the same thing to protect illegal immigrants, including many of whom are vicious criminals, isn’t a similar activity. According to a recent poll, only 24% of Americans believe that it is acceptable to go beyond peaceful protest in response to ICE enforcement. But among White women 18-44, that number leaps to an astounding 61%. Maybe they are listening to too many true crime podcasts, but we have to ask ourselves, how on Earth did this become acceptable behavior in our society? The short answer is that for most of this century, our law enforcement agencies and courts have just let it happen. They have decided that some criminal activity is just fine so long as your cause is just. This often begins with infractions of the law that border on silly, such as throwing a Subway sandwich at a cop, but then the sandwich becomes a snowball, then a lock, and the next thing you know people are striking federal agents with SUVs. The video of Good and her partner heckling and, let's be honest, goading ICE officers with an obnoxious smugness that makes most people’s skin crawl, is just one of many. We see these self-important White women doing it in video after video after video, taunting cops, insulting journalists or even bystanders, often with a weird and disturbing glee. Let’s be clear, this is happening because we let it happen. Where I live in West Virginia, if I saw a state trooper had pulled over a friend of mine and decided to start throwing things at the cop, I would rightfully be arrested. So why are the rules different when opposing ICE? The responsible thing for every Democrat in politics and in the media to do today, right now, is to tell their audiences that it is never OK to assault a cop, it is never OK to impede a federal investigation, and they need to knock it off. Instead, Friday saw Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., riling up a Minnesota crowd from the back of a pickup truck saying, "You all have insisted that this resistance is not one that can be intimidated." If she was referring to using automobiles to thwart federal agents, as she seemed to be, that is simply a call for insurrection. In fact, there is good reason to believe that anyone who would say that should not be in Congress. Sadly, Democrats will not do the responsible thing, even though it would protect their own supporters such as Good, who should still be alive today. No, there is only one answer here; enforcing the law. And here is my warning: If we do not enforce the law, if we simply allow these cosplaying would-be revolutionaries to do whatever they want, including hitting cops with cars, Renee Good will not be the last to needlessly die. This madness needs to end, and it needs to end right now."
Jessica McBride | Facebook - "This is one of the most interesting responses I got on an earlier post asking law enforcement and use-of-force experts to weigh in on whether the Good shooting was legally justified. I have his identity. But he needs to stay anonymous. READ IT ALL. The post-
“I am a current ICE Use of Force Instructor with over a decade of federal law enforcement experience as well as nearly two decades of military experience. I can tell you the situation is ‘lawful but awful’ because it is justified, but it's awful for a lot of reasons (i.e. she didn't need to try to drive through, she was engaged in protesting, etc). He (Ross) is also a firearms instructor, a field intelligence officer (both in Border Patrol and now in ICE), and he is also a field intelligence officer and assigned to the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force - he is a VERY experienced officer. ICE use of force policy does state what others have been arguing that he cannot create a danger. However, they had stopped her and were attempting to take her out of the vehicle and place her in custody for a violation of 18USC111. ICE employees are designated as ‘immigration officers.’ And are therefore conferred legal authorities under 8 USC 1357 for the purpose of arrest. a1-a4 relate specifically to aliens, A5 (A) &(B) relates to ANYONE. So ICE absolutely had the ability to stop and detain her. She speaks clear English as indicated by the video, so there's no reason to believe that she couldn't understand the instructions that she was given.
The passenger was allowed to get out of the vehicle and start filming which indicates either: A potential trap for law enforcement, or B an agitator looking for reaction. The vehicle was parked perpendicular to the roadway with an ice vehicle in front of and behind. The position of the vehicle indicates that what the agents told was true that she was following, trying to insert her car between agents, attempting to block them, etc. That becomes dangerous, because what is the reason for doing so? Is it a drop for law enforcement? Is it just harassing conduct, officers don't know, but it is intimidating conduct which is also covered by 18 USC 111. She was ordered to exit the vehicle, which law enforcement officers are authorized to do under Pennsylvania v Mimms and officers attempted to remove her from the vehicle, at that point she backed the vehicle up indicating a lack of compliance. At that point he crosses in front of the vehicle. Here is the rub, he could have been crossing to move to support his team mate. We don't know, we don't have any intent. As an aside, good on him for having a camera rolling, especially if he didn't have a body cam.
Now when I heard the drive baby drive comment, Yes her steering wheel was locked to the right, but you can only tell that if you were from the side of the vehicle and could see how far the tires had turned where he could not from his viewpoint. Drive baby drive being said when an officer is in front shows a lack of regard for safety, and the officer may have felt that was a trap to try to run him over. That would be serious bodily injury or death, and use of force is not a 50/50 proposition where I have to meet your force with an equal but opposite force, I can use the minimum amount of force necessary to stop your actions. When a vehicle is weaponized, it increases the likelihood of deadly force utilization. Many are also interpreting ice policy incorrectly when they say that ice policy says that you won't shoot at moving vehicles. What it's saying is that you cannot shoot at a moving vehicle to ‘disable the vehicle.’ However, if you shoot at the driver to stop a threat that is legitimate use of force. We don't shoot at tires because they move and because they don't actually stop the threat plus a 9mm may not penetrate certain parts of the cabin, or may over penetrate tires, so it would be an unnecessary risk.
Now, in the totality of circumstances - we have ICE enforcing the law on others or generally existing. An uninvolved party from out of town comes to the ICE operation, begins harassing conduct, continues dangerously harassing conduct against officers for blocks, somehow cuts them off and positions their vehicle (seemingly to prevent travel), issued commands to get out in a language she does understand, she refuses through her actions, officers attempt to take her out of the vehicle, she actively resists by moving the vehicle and pulling her arm away. The officer in front sees this go down, (I would have thought that she was going to injure the other officers) prompting the officer to draw, ‘drive baby drive’ is said, she starts going forward, deadly force is utilized. I would reasonably think that by her continuing to drive that she posed a continuing threat to law enforcement given the violent nature of the previous harassing conduct, the violent active resistance to detention/arrest immediately preceding the use, and driving through (with her passenger now outside of the vehicle) increasing the likelihood of another violent conflict. Lastly, let's take a moment to talk about how his experience informs the use of force. He's in Minnesota, stationed in Minnesota. He's not an outsider. So he knows what is "normal conduct" for the area. He is aware of the current tactics by protesters in Minnesota including the violent mob tactics and the use of vehicles in dangerous manners to assault, resist, impede, or intimidate ICE. That experience plays a significant factor in the perception of the subject's actions. Now add to that the officer’s experience being dragged, where he now sees the officer attempting to extract the subject doing so while the subject seems to drive away. He knows that can result in serious bodily injury or death.
Is it awful? 100%. I know of absolutely no one that wakes up looking to shoot someone. I wish I never have to use a firearm, and I’ve only drawn it two times (once off duty) and taken the slack out of the trigger once. It would put a pit in anyone's stomach that they committed the most permanent seizure and took someone's life over something the subject could have and should have avoided.”"
Comment: "Good explanation, as an officer myself he explained more than I wished to type! One addition not many saw is that the operator accelerated so fast her tires spun on the ice if you look closely. If the tires had not spun she would have most likely struck the officer harder or more directly."
Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry. on X - "I am sad for any loss of life but can't believe the legacy media in the US AND Australia and the UK is turning Renee Good -- the women who drove a van which carried THE FAMILY DOG into a Federal law enforcement activity zone, blocked armed agents, and directed the vehicle TOWARD an armed agent -- into a saint. She is being lauded as a mom and as a poet but her incredibly dangerous and reckless behavior is being erased. Remember that when agents' vehicles are blocked, whether here or in Afghanistan or Iraq, that is the prelude to an ambush or a bombing. The leadership of the Left wants martyrs if they are instructing people to take this insane step."
Meme - "Imagine fighting and dying just so corporations can keep their illegal slaves"
Jacob M. Wright | Facebook - "When Charlie Kirk, a peaceful dialoguer, was murdered, the right showed up in the thousands for prayer vigils. When Renee Good, a far left extremist, got killed because she rammed a law officer with her car, the left showed up in the thousands to attack more law enforcement and break stuff. We are not the same. Not even close."
Meme - Tired Peasant: "The lack of empathy in this country is depressing"
Kangmin Lee: "This you?"
Tired Peasant @HorrorGorl: "Congratulations to Charlie Kirk, it's been over 2 months since he's said anything bigoted..."
As usual, left wing "empathy", "kindness" and "being a decent person" are highly selective and weaponised
DHS says woman attempted to run over ICE officers before being shot in Minneapolis. Here’s what the videos show. | CNN - "A video from a different angle, obtained and reviewed by CNN, seems to show the car making contact with the officer before he fired his gun the first time."
When even CNN admits he hit her. But many left wingers continue lying
wanye on X - "I’m not suggesting that anybody should want to gloat about this, but you really do at the very least have to marvel at the incongruity between what she thought her standing was in that situation and her actual standing in that situation."
Cathy Young ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ฆ on X - "Earlier today @xwanyex was complaining about people seeing themselves as his moral superiors because his politics. Having seen this tweet, I feel I can safely say that most of us are his moral superiors."
Wilfred Reilly on X - "This is actually an excellent example of someone totally confirming Wayne's point, which is that leftists tend to see mundane disagreements as evidence of "moral" superiority. Here, without gloating- a thing he SPECIFICALLY SAYS - Big Dub is pointing out that Renee Good dramatically misjudged how much armed and busy Federal agents were going to 'respect her power' or whatever. The results were tragic and permanent. Someone literally responds by saying that his making this mundane-ass, accurate, mildly insensitive point means she is his moral superior."
Mike Bales ๐ซก๐บ๐ธ on X - "If you say the ICE agent deserved to get hit because he wouldn’t get out of the way, you are giving everyone the green light to drive through your protests when you refuse to get out of the streets."
Anthony Brian Logan (ABL) ๐บ๐ธ on X - "Liberals: "You shouldn't stand in front of a moving car!"
Liberals outside of an ICE facility in Medford, Oregon:"
Groovy Writer on X - "Looks like the retards are lying in a parking lot. ๐๐๐"
Matt Walsh on X - "Actual innocent women and mothers are killed every day in this country by lawless thugs with 20+ prior arrests, still walking the streets because some woke judge has more compassion for violent animals than law abiding citizens. The people weeping over Renee Good never say a word about any of those victims. No candlelight vigils. No mass outrage. No protests. And we’re supposed to take their grief seriously? As if these people are even capable of sincere human emotion at this point? Give me a break."
Discharge of patients with an acute upper gastrointestinal bleed from the emergency department using an extended Glasgow-Blatchford Score - "Objective. To use an extended Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS) cut-off of ≤1 to aid discharge of patients presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) from emergency departments...
Results 569 patients presented with AUGIB from 2015 to 2018. 146 (25.7%) had a GBS ≤1 (70, GBS=0; 76, GBS=1). Of these, 103 (70.5%) were managed as outpatients, and none had an adverse outcome."
Weird. Left wingers keep telling us that internal bleeding means you will be hospitalised
Matt Van Swol on X - "Five Left-wing narratives instantly crumble with the body cam footage:
1) Renee was terrified for her life. She absolutely was NOT. She was smiling and taunting officers. Literally zero fear.
2) The officer was not hit. Clearly, he was hit HARD.
3) Renee didn't know who the officers were. Clearly false from the new footage, they knew EXACTLY who they were.
4) Renee was peacefully trying to leave the scene. Clearly not, she slammed on the accelerator directly into the officer, even when she had nearly a full minute to leave the scene prior to him being in front of the car.
5) Renee wasn't involved in any ICE-related activities. Instantly proven false. The wife/partner in the video clearly states they are going to harass ICE "later".
What is beyond insane to me is that the Renee's partner screams for her "Drive! Drive!" when law enforcement commands her to exit the car. Absolutely horrifying to watch."
Reality doesn't matter to the left. Only the narrative. It's amazing how they interpret the video evidence to mean the opposite of what it shows
Tom Emmer on X - "Evil. The Star Tribune is trying to get ICE agents killed."
Will Ricciardella on X - "For Ashli Babbitt, authorities and the media withheld the officer’s name for seven months until he chose to go public himself. In the Minneapolis ICE shooting, officials cited “safety concerns,” yet reporters miraculously got the agent’s name the very next day. Strange how that works."
Meme - Maze @mazemoore: "Two nights ago on CNN. Ashli Babbitt deserved to be shot because she was told to stop and she didn't."
Rebekah Jones on X - "Not only did they lie about Renee Good's murderer being hit by a car, they're now digging in and claiming he suffered "internal bleeding" as a result of.... not being hit by a car. The video has been out for a while now. We all saw it. Lock him up."
Cognitive dissonance is amazing
Joyce Carol Oates on X - "so, the drill is: ICE shouts contradictory orders; you try to follow one of these orders; you are shot dead & denounced by the US government as a "domestic terrorist." quite a future for America's youth to look foward to. ."
Left wingers with their fabled understanding skills again. When you're told to stop obstructing the road and you refuse to and are told to get out of the vehicle, clearly this is a contradiction. Clearly she took "Drive, Baby, Drive" as an order from ICE
Suspect accused of smashing windows at Minneapolis Courthouse arrested: FBI - "FBI Director Kash Patel on Thursday identified the suspect as Georgio James-Jones, of Minneapolis... several government vehicles were broken into and vandalized, adding that government property was also stolen."
Arresting peaceful protesters is literally fascism
Right Angle News Network on X - "BREAKING - This man is going viral after revealing that the last woman shot by Minneapolis police was a White woman named Justine Damond, who was killed by a Somali officer after she called for help, and not a single Democrat spoke out or protested."
Left wingers are so easy to manipulate
Gunther Eagleman™ on X - "๐จ LIBERAL WHITE WOMEN ARE OFF THE CHARTS INSANE! New @Cygnal poll DROPS: Only 24% of ALL Americans say it’s OK to use violence & criminal acts against ICE. 70% say NO WAY! But white liberal women 18-44? OVER 61% say it’s perfectly fine to attack ICE agents criminally! White Liberal women are the problem."
Matt Walsh on X - "Left: Renee’s butch “wife” standing in the street, taunting ICE agents, and daring them to “come at us”
Right: Renee grinning and looking at the officer right before driving directly into him
The media lied about every aspect of this case. Again. Enemies of the people."
Gator Gar on X - "She was just trying to turn around, and she didn’t even hit him. He shot her for no reason.
Okay she belonged to an anti-ICE organization that trained her to do this, but she was just on her way home from dropping her son off at school, and she didn’t know the masked men were officers. She waved for them to pass! Then an agent shot her through the driver’s side window for no reason!
Okay fine. She moved to Minnesota for the sole purpose of impeding ICE operations, and her and her wife were blocking traffic for several minutes while heckling the agents, but she was turning the car away when she hit him, because she was scared and he called her a bitch!
Alright alright, she was fleeing the scene of a protest she was leading and knowingly blocked the road during an ICE operation, and when a law enforcement officer told her repeatedly to exit the vehicle, she instead angled the SUV toward one of the ICE agents and accelerated abruptly, hit him, and then he said “bitch” after he shot her in self defense, but the real reason he shot her was because she wasn’t afraid of him and that hurt his ego! He could’ve just let her run him over and then shot her tires out like in a movie!
This is how this story developed in real time, and they aren’t joking. They believe their own warped perspective every step of the way."
Gator Gar on X - "You can use your car to block any roadway you want as long as you wave people by."
Dustin Grage on X - "๐จ BREAKING: Was just sent a video showing the moments before the shooting. In it, you can clearly see Renee Good’s vehicle blocking ICE agents for over 3 minutes as she’s dancing to her own car horn. Kinda ruins some narratives, doesn’t it?"
Amy Swearer on X - "Good parked her car perpendicular to the flow of traffic on a one-way street, blocking the path of an ICE vehicle caravan for at least three minutes."
Left wingers have poor comprehension skills and will retort that someone blocking traffic doesn't mean you can murder him, but this is meant to address the lies that she was just observing, just an innocent bystander and just a mom dropping off her kids
Kangmin Lee | ์ด๊ฐ๋ฏผ on X - "Dear liberal women, You are not Black Widow fighting against secret Nazi Hydra agents. Life is not a Marvel movie. When you attack and try to run over ICE agents, you will face the consequences for not only endangering law enforcement but also preventing them from enforcing basic immigration law. This is real life. For the sake of your own life and your children (if you have any), please stop being retarded and go back home."
Left wingers think movies are real life, which is why they think law enforcement should just shoot vehicle tires instead of attackers
Meme - Michael Martin: "For today's lesson in propaganda... Why do you think media are promoting an older photo of Renee Good, smiling and with flowing tresses, instead of this more recent, butchified shot?"
Meme - "The woman killed today in an encounter with ICE agents is dead because liberals gaslit her into thinking she could do whatever she wanted & call it social justice..."
Meme - "Bored lesbians *baboon with stick creeping up on lion*
ICE *resting lion*"
