Gina Milan on X - "Meet Chicago Democrat and 49th Ward Alderwoman Maria Hadden, who pretty much blamed Sheridan Gorman for her own murder: “The kids were out doing normal things people do in the neighborhood. And it sounds like this might have been a wrong-place, wrong-time situation, running into a person who had a gun. They might have unintentionally startled this person at the end of the pier.” THESE PEOPLE ARE SICK!"
Councilwoman Vickie Paladino on X - "This is how most Democrats think about crime, she's just saying it out loud. The criminals are mostly blameless, just 'doing normal things people do in the neighborhood', and the victims are people who don't belong there and get themselves killed. They have no interest in taking any kind of action, because they don't think any of it is a big deal. Criminals have a right to be criminals, don't get in their way, and who are we to judge. This is why their neighborhoods are war zones. This is also the central philosophical idea behind progressive criminal justice reforms. Crime is not a moral outrage, but rather a natural phenomenon, like the weather or earthquakes. You don't get angry at a tornado, do you? You can't jail a thunderstorm, right? Why would your reaction to robbery or murder be any different? That's what we're up against here."
To be more accurate, this is how left wingers think about crime which is not committed by a "majority". When it comes to a "majority", they want the harshest of penalties
Meme - "MIRROR'S EDGE
"Dystopian" games in the 2000's be like
>this city may appear clean and pretty and low crime and high trust on the outside, but look inside and there is... like... surveillance and police or something"
New York Post on X - "Young SoCal couple just days away from giving birth tragically killed by suspected DUI driver fleeing cops"
nobody from nowhere on X - "cops killed these people"
Meme - sayce0851: "Black man invades White home, murders 6-year-old, stabs 4 others: Receives early release. White girl gets drunk and says words: Early release denied. (from a sentence that was insane to begin with) "Justice" isn't blind - it's anti-White."
"Family furious as Kentucky child killer freed 9 years early for 'good behavior' "
"Ex-Kentucky student sent to jail for shouting N-word is denied early release"
Coddled Affluent Professional on X - "There was a guy in my neighborhood who would go around shoving, slapping, spitting on, and screaming at people on the street. His preference was women walking with strollers or small children. There was a Facebook page dedicated to his exploits of which a couple dozen were documented. I don’t think he was ever arrested for any of this stuff. At some point he was finally arrested in midtown for something more serious and he finally disappeared. Anyways, this sort of thing has become more common in NYC the past few years, it wouldn’t have been tolerated a decade ago, and it doesn’t show up well in crime stats either because arrests aren’t made or because the crimes are pled down to nothing. People have a hard time articulating the sort of lower grade persistent social disorder that’s at issue: your neighbors aren’t getting shot or stabbed but they are being subject to low grade assaults, having things stolen, and all sorts of other little insults and injuries, of which some can occasionally be very serious. If you complain about permissiveness of low grade criminality and social disorder to libs they will roll their eyes at you but the failure to enforce order actually represents a huge technocratic failing, one that I consider to be disqualifying. There is a reactionary sentiment in the air and it’s not because people have been misled about what’s going on. It’s that they don’t like homeless people washing their genitals in the playground water fountain or shooting up on a park bench in broad daylight at 2pm on a Wednesday and other things like that. People know these things are unnecessary and don’t need to happen and the reason they are happening is because of a political program by Soros DAs and other like minded people that has the goal of intentionally immiserating the public in this exact way."
Austin Justice on X - "San Francisco is now a model for how to fight crime. A few years ago it averaged 86 car break-ins per day. Today: 15. SF did two things:
1. Got a DA that prosecutes criminals: Following the successful recall of Chesa Boudin, DA Brooke Jenkins started prosecuting prolific offenders and said so loudly. Crime dropped every year since she took office.
2. Put tech to use: In 2024, SF activated 400 license plate readers and deployed 80 drones citywide. This tech feeds officers live intelligence on suspects in motion. Drones alone have assisted in 1,000+ arrests since then. The technology lets authorities solve crimes as they happen rather than depend on much more intensive, legally perilous post hoc investigations (which ironically are often more intrusive than using tech).
The results:
- Car break-ins down 85%
- Robbery down 30%
- Burglary down 33%.
- Homicides hit their lowest level since 1954.
Plate readers, drones, a prosecutor who prosecutes. That's the whole formula!
Austin has the opposite approach. License plate cameras are effectively banned. Jail bookings are down despite repeat offenders victimizing innocent people regularly. Bond violations went from 37 in 2020 to 250 last year. SF proved crime is a choice. Austin, so far, keeps making a different one."
Massachusetts DAs can no longer hold armed robbers before trial — the state's highest court ruled it's not violent enough - "Domingo Agostini, 41, of Port St. Lucie, Florida, walked into the Rockland Trust on Brayton Avenue in Fall River on August 18 and handed a teller a note scrawled on a paper bag: "I have a bomb."... Having a gun during a robbery isn’t enough. You have to use it. This isn't a one-off. The SJC has been gutting 58A for years. In 2022, they ruled that manslaughter and assault with a dangerous weapon don't qualify either — as long as the crime could have been committed recklessly... In 2019, they ruled that statutory rape and indecent assault on a child don't qualify. Same decision, the justices threw out the entire catch-all provision of the law that gave prosecutors wiggle room in tough cases. Called it "unconstitutionally vague." Gone. Now armed robbery is off the list too. The law that was written in 1994 to keep violent criminals locked up before trial has been carved down to almost nothing... The pattern is everywhere. A career criminal with 47 prior charges was out on $0 bail for four separate felonies when he carjacked a woman and was shot by a Boston police officer. A 77-year-old man was beaten over a misdelivered package by a career criminal who was already out on bail. This ruling is part of the reason why. The SJC handed down this ruling on March 10. No press conference. No politician said a word. The court quietly made it harder to keep violent criminals locked up, and moved on. The people living with the consequences didn't get a heads up."
Street-racing stolen BMW rams TTC bus, flipping it 180° and ejecting a female passenger. 2 of BMW's 4 passengers were out on bail (one for violent armed robbery). : r/TorontoDriving - "Then they reduce the speed limit due to history of crashes even though its stunt drivers who dont have any regard to any laws."
Street-racing stolen BMW rams TTC bus, flipping it 180° and ejecting a female passenger. 2 of BMW's 4 passengers were out on bail (one for violent armed robbery). : r/TorontoDriving - "2/4 of the stolen BMW occupants were out on bail lols.... Do the crime.... And thennnnnn do the crime again lol"
Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 on X - "Man wielding a machete and repeatedly calling himself Lucifer slashed three elderly people on the subway platforms (one at the 7 and two at the 4/5/6) at Grand Central in NYC on Saturday morning before being shot dead by cops. NYPD told the assailant at least 20 times to drop the knife. Officers also attempted to de-escalate and offered assistance, saying, “We are going to get you help.” The assailant then approached the officers with the knife extended and was shot twice by an officer. They then provided life-saving measures. The assailant was transported to Bellevue Hospital, where he was pronounced deceased. The assailant has been identified as 44-year-old Anthony Griffin. He reportedly had at least a dozen prior arrests, including one for menacing with a sharp object. The three victims who were slashed were taken to the hospital in stable condition. The epidemic of violent criminals being allowed on the streets of America is ridiculous and it’s getting worse. Judges who set these maniacs free need to face legal consequences. NYPD performed admirably today and likely saved countless lives. (livenowfox on YT)"
Rafael A. Mangual on X - "Guy just took a machete to the heads and bodies of random subway riders at Grand Central Station before NYPD officers finally shot him. According to the @nypost, “He has 13 prior arrests, including one for menacing with a sharp object...”"
Elise Stefanik on X - "Gotham has fallen. A machete wielding slasher with 13 prior arrests who calls himself ‘Lucifer’ on a bloody rampage in Grand Central Station “An 85-year-old man suffered a deep cut across his head, and a 65-year-old man suffered cuts on his head on the 4, 5, 6 subway platform at the iconic station at 9:50 a.m., police said. A 70-year-old woman was slashed in the shoulder.”"
There is no human right not to be attacked in public. Only a human right to attack people and not be shot by the police
Doc_aka_Rich on X - ""NYPD told the assailant at least 20 times to drop" Why should they have given the instruction more than once before acting? Give the benefit of the doubt whether they heard it the first time --- twice. I find it troubling that they would repeat an order 20 times before taking action. Same thing for traffic stops. Failure to act in the presence of disobedience only encourages further disobedience."
Slater Horne on X - "Its sad that the officers in this incident practically begged this mope about 20 times to drop the knife. These cops are concerned that some clown "judge" is going to put THEM in jail for violating this poor, misunderstood perp's rights. Enough already, impeach moronic judges!!"
Legally Dashing on X - "Did they try calling a social worker? 😏"
Jeff on X - "When was the last time we heard one of these crimes was ever committed by a first time offender? They are almost all preventable if DAs and judges would just do their jobs and keep these scumbags in jail."
Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 on X - "Do their jobs? They think their jobs is to terrorize the people into depending on government forever."
Thread by @taliaotg on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "Does NYPD know how to disarm people without going straight to lethal force? Follow-up question: Has anyone else noticed that NYPD consistently reacts to a person with a knife by shooting them??
Fascists trying to flood the mentions with stupid shit: NYPD is trained on disarming people with knives and continues to not use that training. People who refuse to drop it when directed are often NOT LUCID and don’t know what’s going on. That doesn’t grant you license to kill! You morons are currently jerking off to a group of ROTC cadets who tackled & stabbed a mass shooter but in your universe, trained NYPD officers are not allowed to do close contact with armed individuals and any suggestion that they do that is wrong?? lmao ok!!! Gunna die waiting for any mention on any first aid any of those cops rendered to anyone this guy had hurt, too. Because despite also being trained in first aid, NYPD tends to also never deploy that training in situations where people need intervention prior to EMS arrival.
Holy shit. Cops had plenty of time to tell this guy 20 times to drop the knife, and “de-escalated” by saying “they could get him help” and in all that time, no taser, no mace, nothing. But according to yall, they HAD to shoot IMMEDIATELY. 🤡🤡🤡🤡 Bootlicking melts your brain.
Turning replies back on so you morons can keep helping my engagement rate. Tell your blue check friends to say stupid shit at me too. Go on, bootlickers!!!!"
I'm just surprised she didn't accuse the police of acting as judge, jury and executioner
Left-Wing Activist Group Teaches Liberals How To Get Through Jury Selection and Vote 'Not Guilty' on Trump DOJ Prosecutions, Recordings Show - "A left-wing activist group is teaching liberals in Washington, D.C., and "across the United States" how to increase their chances of serving as jurors on cases brought by the Trump Department of Justice so they can undermine its chances of securing convictions... Freedom Trainers, whose fiscal sponsor is the George Soros-funded group Community Change, is working to make "jury nullification"—the practice of voting against a conviction even if the defendant broke the law—a go-to legal weapon for the Left. Its sessions and training materials, reviewed by the Free Beacon, show how the group teaches "committed people" to gum up federal prosecutions. The group tells attendees to keep their addresses current to ensure they receive summons. Then, during the jury selection process, it advises them to "Never mention jury nullification," "Don't signal an agenda," and "say you'll listen to the evidence before forming conclusions." Once selected, the group tells its trainees to vote "not guilty" for any reason. Freedom Trainers' efforts—which have not been previously reported—underscore the difficulty the Trump administration faces in securing convictions in the nation's capital and other blue bastions. "While we respect jurors' role in the judicial process, the Department takes jury nullification and interference with official proceedings extremely seriously," a Department of Justice spokeswoman said in a statement to the Free Beacon. "Any group attempting to improperly influence juries who should serve as impartial arbiters of evidence should be held accountable."... Carrie Severino, the president of the right-leaning Judicial Crisis Network, said the jury nullification effort raises significant legal questions and could threaten Americans' confidence in the justice system. "Dark-money networks are intent on attacking the judicial system at every level, with their latest scheme to sway juries and encourage citizens to nullify the law. It wasn't enough for Soros and dark-money groups to back far-left prosecutors who released criminals and led to rising crime or to push judges who ignore the rule of law," Severino told the Free Beacon. "These latest attempts challenge the constitutional right to an impartial jury and, even worse, encourage citizens to bypass laws passed by our elected representatives. This is just one more aspect of the legal system these extreme groups are trying to infiltrate.""
KARE 11 on X - "A teen accused of shooting a man in the head was found incompetent to stand trial, then let go. He’s now charged with shooting another man in the head."
Evil (Political) Scientist on X - "'So we keep letting him shoot people in the head, then, until we-- I don't know-- solve mental retardation'"
Minnesota, so no surprise
Voices: The police aren’t just failing to solve crime – they’ve stopped trying - "Police left 92 per cent of burglaries unsolved last year. Across a third of England and Wales, not a single break-in was solved in the entire year. Not a poor result – zero. And mobile phone theft? That’s moved beyond under-policed into something that needs a different word entirely. Fewer than one in 100 cases led to a charge. One per cent. At that point, you’re not really policing it. You’re just filing it. At that level, it isn’t enforcement – it’s administration. The crime is real, the response is paperwork. As a former chief prosecutor, I worked in a system that, whatever its faults, took seriously the idea that crime must have consequences. That principle is the load-bearing wall of everything else. Remove it, and nothing holds. What these statistics tell us is that, for huge categories of everyday crime, that wall is gone. We haven’t formally decriminalised burglary or phone theft. We’ve just stopped enforcing them, gradually, quietly, through years of managed decline. I’ve long called for a dedicated unit to tackle phone theft. London’s own targeted operation against organised theft networks actually worked: phone theft in the capital dropped by around 10,000 cases in a single year. Focused, intelligent enforcement gets results. We know this. Bank robbery is down 90 per cent over the last decade because you carry your bank in your hand. Treat mobile phone theft as we used to treat bank robbery – with its own version of the “Sweeney”. We protected the money; we neglected the device. But the police aren’t the whole story. There’s no point putting effort into a burglary investigation when you know any suspect will wait three years for a court date and may receive a sentence that barely registers. We won’t bring in special courts as we do during major public disorder. The whole system has stopped rewarding good investigative work – so, gradually, it stopped doing it. There are practical fixes that don’t require years of structural reform. Enforce minimum investigation standards for every home burglary: attend the scene, recover forensics, don’t close the case within 48 hours without explanation. Use the technology we already have: a national stolen phone register feeding directly into Trading Standards would collapse the market that makes phone theft worth doing in the first place. And go after the networks – stolen phones are being shipped to Dubai, China and Romania. This is organised crime. It should be treated like it... I spent my career arguing that the rule of law isn’t an abstract concept. It’s what people experience when they report a crime and believe something will actually happen. That belief is eroding, not with a bang, but case by case, in 393 abandoned burglary investigations every single day. When the public stops believing the law will act, the law has already begun to fail."
Devon Eriksen on X - "Most people think of philosophy as an abstraction that doesn't touch the real world, but they're wrong. Most real world problems are philosophy problems, and most philosophy problems are "giving things the wrong names". For example, if you call feral drug addicts "homeless people", then you can't solve the problem. You can only buy more houses for feral drug addicts to destroy. In this case, we called the police and courts the "justice system". But they're not. They can't be the justice system. The function of a justice system would be to give everyone what they deserve. Now, I deserve a hundred million dollars, a private Caribbean island, and a foot massage from Lauren Bacall in her prime, but I don't see the "justice" system lifting a finger to correct any of this, do you? No, what we are supposed to have is a public safety system. The function of a public safety system is to keep the public and their property safe. If we understood that, we wouldn't care about what criminals deserve. We would care how likely they are to do it again. Or something worse. In a public safety system, retardation and mental illness are not migrating factors. They are the opposite. Because they mean that the criminal is more likely to pose a future threat. We all understand this. We all understand that the feral retard who stabs strangers on the train for being White and beautiful is a worse person than the man who murders his wife and her lover when he catches them in the act. Not because of some abstract calculus of moral agency, of who is disadvantaged and who isn't, but because one is certainly going to murder more people if he can, while the other is a lot less likely to. We've known for centuries, if not millennia, that it's the same small percentage of people doing all the robbing, raping, and murdering, over and over and over again. And we've known for centuries that if you physically remove them from society, that's 100% effective in stopping them from doing it again. The only hurdle is philosophical. Call it a "justice" system, and you have to argue endlessly about morality and redemption, and then some leftie thug-hugger weaponizes your own Christianity against you. Call it public safety, and you confine the argument to likelihood of reoffense. Then you are in the realm of statistics. Which you can compute. It all starts with naming things correctly, according to their actual nature."
Daniel Friedman on X - "Two years ago, Naomi Guzman doused her father in lighter fluid and tried to set him on fire, then broke into a church and threatened a priest with a knife. She was found incompetent to stand trial and released. Today, she abducted a toddler and stabbed him before she was shot and killed by police."
Nebraska woman shot by police had prior arrest for stabbing father: report - "A Nebraska woman who was fatally shot by police earlier this week after stabbing a 3-year-old boy with a knife was previously arrested after she allegedly attacked her father with a knife and broke into a nearby Catholic church in a rampage... She was subsequently taken into custody as she attempted to jump out of a window, but later released on her own recognizance while facing four felony charges, according to WOWT. Prior to her arrest two years ago, Guzman reportedly had been convicted in 2018 on a third-degree assault charge. "
Clearly, the police are murderers for acting as judge, jury and executioner
Daniel Concannon on X - "~ Brown woman kidnaps White child at knifepoint
~ Brown woman attempts to murder White child
~ Brown woman receives 1/1000th the media coverage of White mom who said a word to a Somali child stealing from her on a Minnesota playground"
The Singularity of Tyranny - "Reasonable people must be asking, “Why?” Why are state and city elected officials openly defying federal law? Why are prosecutors refusing to prosecute? Why are judges and juries handing out wrist slaps or outright releasing of violent criminals who have raped, murdered, assaulted, and committed massive, systematic fraud, only to send them back into communities to do it all again? The answer isn’t complicated, even if it’s uncomfortable to say plainly. All these incidents are the actions of tyrants (or their sycophants). In sense, these leftist justice “warriors” are the heroes of their own fiction. They don’t serve a “greater good”, have some divine knowledge, or are better than the common man, in fact, most of them are worse than the common man because they are slaves to emotion rather than a servant of reason. They do it because they have contempt for the very laws they are sworn to uphold. More than that, they have contempt for the civilization that decided those laws were necessary in the first place, the accumulated understanding that certain behaviors destroy communities, that a civil society cannot function without enforceable boundaries, that the law exists to protect people, not ideas. This is the leftist oppressor/oppressed dynamic in action, the poisonous idea that the law is just the tool of the oppressor, its only purpose is to control racial and lower economic classes, and in America the “oppressor” is almost always white. The only reason we see the law turning its eye away from racial minorities (especially imported racial minorities), illegal immigrants, the mentally ill is because law abiding people are perceived as oppressors and therefore political enemies of the left. What they are doing is not governance, progressive reform, or compassion. It is a war, one waged on all citizens, not merely those who are ideologically misaligned with the people in power. The result, as always, is chaos—and chaos is the tool of the revolutionary. The revolutionary claims to desire justice, but all they really want is revenge and retribution. Their answer to any past discrimination is simply more discrimination against a targeted group. Once people witness the arbitrary and capricious enforcement of law, once they see that the rules apply to some and not to others, that guilt can be erased by a sympathetic judge, a passport is just a ticket to a country without extradition, or that massive theft of taxpayer money is treated as a victimless crime, people lose confidence in the law itself. Once that confidence is gone, justice becomes a dying star, folding itself into the nothingness of the singularity created by its own death, and if it is not stopped, it will suck America in with it."
On the tyranny part of anarcho-tyranny
Austin Justice on X - "Washington DC is on pace for roughly 42 murders this year -- the lowest since at least 1930. Two years ago it had 274. Carjackings are also down (by 44%). What changed:
1) New U.S. Attorney replaced a soft-on-crime predecessor and immediately started actually prosecuting, including seeking the death penalty for the worst offenders.
2) There's more visible law enforcement presence now. Federal law enforcement and the National Guard deployed to cover a 50-year low in local police staffing -- a hole created by city council budget cuts that some estimate will take a decade to fully close.
3) Ended policy of refusing to charge juveniles as an adult, signaling to the youth that there will be consequences for their crimes. The prior admin prosecuted exactly one juvenile for armed carjacking over a decade, so gangs recruited juveniles to steal cars. Arrest-to-offense ratio for carjacking went from 25% to 58% last year."
@amuse on X - "CRIME: Austin elected a Soros-backed DA named José Garza. He stopped prosecuting many property crimes and, predicably, in just a few short years burglaries quadrupled."
Austin Justice on X - "A major drop in Baltimore murders began right after voters booted their Soros-backed DA. Under Marilyn Mosby (2015–2022):
• Homicides surged 46%
• Arrests collapsed
• She took 23 out-of-town trips while crime spiked
In her final year: 334 murders
In 2024: 202
So far in 2025: just 68
DA Mosby eventually indicted for mortgage fraud. New DA Ivan Bates came in, prosecuted gun offenders, and crime plummeted."
David Wallace-Wells on X - "In Philadelphia, where another “Soros-backed prosecutor” has remained in office, murders also fell from an all-time high in 2021 to an all-time low in 2025. The same pattern holds in Chicago, Detroit, indeed—in broad strokes—across the entire country. Hard to believe it’s policy."
Austin Justice on X - "Since the massive spike in crime in 2020-2021, blue cities have reacted very differently and had very different results, and too many journalists seem totally incurious to learn why. The homicide variance between Philly and Baltimore is about 62% but David Wallace-Wells seems to think they’re the same because homicide declined in both cities (from unprecedented highs)? And he’s apparently unaware that Chicago, like Baltimore, is doing better recently because it also voted out its rogue prosecutor and put in a much tougher prosecutor who, for example, reduced threshold for felony upgrades and mandates prosecutors to seek detention for violent crimes. I hope he gets more curious and keeps an open mind."
