Europa.com on X - "🇬🇧 The Ministry of Justice has ordered the deletion of the UK's largest court reporting archive. Courtsdesk, a platform launched to improve media access to magistrates' court data has been ordered to delete its archive of records by David Lammy's Ministry of Justice. According to Courtsdesk, the platform has since been used by more than 1,500 journalists from 39 media organisations and the data provided has highlighted serious failures in the courts system. It said journalists were given no advance notice of 1.6 million criminal hearings, the number of court cases listed was accurate on just 4.2 per cent of sitting days and half a million weekend cases were heard with no notification to the press. In November, HM Courts and Tribunal Service issued the company a cessation notice, citing what it called "unauthorised sharing" of court data, on the basis of a test feature, claiming this was a "data protection issue." Enda Leahy, the Courtsdesk chief executive said: "We built the only system that could tell journalists what was actually happening in the criminal courts. We wrote 16 times asking for dialogue. Last week we got our answer: delete everything. If the government were interested in open justice, they would engage in a dialogue." Follow: @europa"
Dei Civitas on X - "The Third Worlder who somehow managed to get appointed as the UK’s Minister of Justice already decided to wipe out centuries of legal precedent, canceling the ancient right for citizens to be tried by a jury of their peers. Now he has ordered the destruction of all court records which include testimonies about the genocidal Muslim campaign of rape against Britain’s little children."
MoJ orders deletion of UK’s largest court reporting archive - "Courtsdesk, which supports the media in monitoring records, is an important tool for journalists and the move raises concerns over open justice... According to Courtsdesk, the platform has since been used by more than 1,500 journalists from 39 media organisations and the data provided has highlighted serious failures in the courts system. It said journalists were given no advance notice of 1.6 million criminal hearings, the number of court cases listed was accurate on just 4.2 per cent of sitting days and half a million weekend cases were heard with no notification to the press. Two-thirds of all courts routinely heard cases that the media was not told about in advance. Seventeen courts that sent outcome records had not once published an advance listing in the entire period, the company’s research found."
Marcus Walker on X - "So let me get this straight: the prosecution of members of the IRA-honouring band, Kneecap, fell apart because the former lawyer for Gerry Adams failed to approve the prosecution until one day (1) after the six month window to do so?"
Meme - Stan Wilson @StanWil14145920: "🚨🇬🇧How it started. /// How it ended🇵🇰🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️."
*Stoic Churchill with bulldog draped with Union Jack vs Distressed Keir Starmer in pink dress, heels and pearl necklace with poodle with pink bowtie and pride flag*
Lee Nallalingham on X - "🚨 EXPOSED: The Green Party say they’re not backed by the wealthy or big business. Here are some of their donors:
💰 Mark Constantine Co-founder of Lush (900+ stores globally) Est. net worth: £250m–£350m 💰 Antony Gormley Internationally renowned sculptor (Angel of the North) Est. net worth: £40m+ 💰 Julian Dunkerton Founder of Superdry (global fashion brand) Est. net worth: £375m+ 💰 Matthew Oakeshott Investment manager & property firm chairman Est. net worth: £25m+ 💰 Sigrid Rausing Tetra Pak heiress Family wealth: £12.5bn 💰 Vivienne Westwood Late founder of global fashion brand Former donor (est. net worth ~£40m at time of death)
Corporate donors:
💰 Lush Retail Ltd Global cosmetics company £800m+ turnover 💰 Ecotricity Ltd Major UK energy supplier £500m+ revenue 💰 Adam Management Holdings Property investment firm Multi-million pound assets
All political parties take money from wealthy donors and businesses. So why do they try to pretend otherwise?"
Ben Pile on X - "The Green Party were never interesting or distinct enough, or capable of mobilising as a political force, to attract much support. Labour's self-immolation has changed that dynamic. The Green Party, however, is the purest product of billionaires' political interventions. Its entire outlook is one cooked up by fake civil society and fake academia that would not have existed at all without the generosity of tycoons. And its genius has been constructing a mythology that convinces its narrow following that they are anti-establishment radicals."
The SNP says Scotland has ‘too few’ migrants. Luckily, I’ve got the perfect solution - "Hannah Spencer – the newbie Green MP for Gorton and Denton – expressed her disgust at finding that, while waiting to take part in late-night votes, some MPs consume alcoholic drinks. She sniffed: “I’m really uneasy about – and I noticed this the other day – when you can smell the alcohol when people are in between votes.” Such horrified puritanism is a touch puzzling – mainly because the leader of Ms Spencer’s party, Zack Polanski, has called for the legalisation of all hard drugs. So the Green position, presumably, is that while the smell of wine or whisky is unacceptable, the smell of skunk would be absolutely fine. Imagine what Parliament will be like during a Polanski premiership. MPs will no longer touch booze. Because they’ll be too busy shooting up at the despatch box, or mugging elderly peers to fund their crack habits."
Starmer avoids ethics enquiry as MPs vote to back him on Mandelson vetting - "Sir Keir Starmer will avoid an ethics inquiry over whether he misled Parliament over the Mandelson scandal. MPs backed the Prime Minister and voted to prevent him being investigated by the privileges committee, which looked into Boris Johnson’s involvement in partygate, by 335 votes to 223. Sir Keir won the vote after whipping his MPs to back him in the Commons on Tuesday, which prompted criticism from several of his Left-wing backbenchers. Fifteen Labour MPs face being suspended from the parliamentary party for defying a three-line whip in the crunch vote. A further 53 Labour MPs abstained, with several doing so in protest against the Government. Others will have done so for other unrelated reasons, such as being unavailable for the vote. Sir Keir has repeatedly removed the whip his own backbenchers for defying the party line. Less than a month after entering No 10, seven Labour MPs were suspended from the parliamentary party for rebelling over the two child benefit cap... Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, said: “To save his own skin, Keir Starmer threatened his MPs with the loss of their jobs unless they helped cover up his misleading statements to Parliament.” The Liberal Democrats claimed that whipping Labour MPs to support the Prime Minister meant Sir Keir “ducked the scrutiny he should have faced”."
We all know who’s to blame for the rise in anti-Semitism – and it is not Israel - "The Prime Minister’s presence was not wanted on the campaign trail by Labour councillors who have twigged that Sir Keir is to voters what hantavirus is to cruises. Both are poisonous. Instead, the PM was in Armenia doing his favourite thing, pledging to give away money we don’t have to the EU. My, how he lights up in the presence of Ursula von der Leyen, squirmy as a contented cat on its back in the sun. And how generous of Ursula to say that Britain can make annual payments of £1bn into European budgets as part of the PM’s Brexit “reset”... It is a mark of how low Starmer and his party have sunk in the 22 months since their loveless landslide that making Peter Mandelson our ambassador to Washington scarcely scrapes into the top 10 of unforced errors. This may just be me, but increasingly it feels as if we are under enemy occupation. Our basic freedoms and values are under threat: sinister moves to restrict trial by jury, a blasphemy law by the back door, aborting babies up till birth. Our borders are a joke, unworthy of a serious country. Our energy security is non-existent thanks to Ed Miliband’s deranged and indefensible pursuit of net zero. Thetford Grammar, a school dating back 1,400 years, says it will soon close due to socialist spite, which hasn’t done a thing to improve the chances of children in state schools but has blighted the happiness of thousands of youngsters whose parents can no longer afford private education. In Shirkers Not Workers Britain, over 600,000 people get more in benefits than hard-working men and women earning the national average wage – both obscene and demoralising. A Telegraph investigation found our veterans have been pursued by the Attorney General, Lord Hermer, for split-second actions taken 40 years ago, although Hermer conceded there had to be “wiggle room” if, by any misfortune, things didn’t go his way and the accused men turned out to be innocent after all. Human rights lawyers have done more good than soldiers, the bounder added. Off to the Tower with him, I say! What else? Oh yes, don’t forget the Government tried to stop 30 local elections going ahead because democracy is such a nuisance when voters think you’re useless. Only the threat of legal action by Reform UK saw them reinstated. Meanwhile, Angela Rayner, scheming to become the single most ignorant person ever to hold the office of prime minister, posts a video of herself with a group of schoolboys. When one lad dares to suggest that “Nigel Farage would be better than Keir Starmer”, Ange unleashes a volley of misinformation, saying that Reform wants a more insurance-based health system, one that is “not free at the point of use”. Furthermore, she berates the blushing boy, who can’t be much more than 15, saying her (premature) son “would probably not have survived” in such a health system. (She seems to have forgotten she sued the NHS for a large amount of money over mistakes made at his birth.) To all of the above, you can add Labour’s jaw-dropping hypocrisy over anti-Semitism. Sir Keir was booed when he visited Golders Green, the blameless heart of British Jewish life, after two men were stabbed by a Somali with the obligatory “mental health issues”... It has been perfectly clear to many of us that, since pro-Palestinian groups applied on October 7, 2023, the very day of the Hamas massacres in Israel, for permission to march through London, an epidemic of Jew-hatred was likely to be the result. Labour, though, found itself in a tricky position. Dependent on votes from the Muslim community, some of whose members are steeped in anti-Semitism by hate-preaching imams in mosques no one is brave enough to shut down, it was reluctant to rock the multicultural boat. Instead, Starmer mouthed platitudes like “to be British is to be diverse”, while that same diversity was leading to Jewish people becoming increasingly scared and even making plans to leave their home, this country. Starmer can no longer ignore the problem, as was his instinct, because the situation is raging out of control. The UK National Terrorism Threat Level has been raised to “Severe”. A putrid Green Party is contesting Thursday’s council elections not on bins and potholes but Gaza and “genocide”. One Green candidate suggested, outrageously, that Israel was behind the Hamas atrocities. Until a hasty U-turn, the party’s leader, Zack Polanski, a Jew himself, was wondering whether the threat Jewish people were feeling was real or just a “perception”. A report released on Monday, May 4 by think tank Policy Exchange, Understanding Islamopopulism: Views of Concern, says British Muslims are on course to further distance themselves from the Labour Party in key election battlegrounds, as well as having “widely differing views from the general population on Gaza, blasphemy and cultural issues such as gender segregation and the presence of dogs in public spaces”. In other words, unlike our Jewish community, too many are poorly integrated and hold un-British values... let us see no more purity tests for British Jews, like the one posed by Sir Tony Brenton, former British ambassador to Russia. In The Times, Sir Tony suggested that if Jews here were more critical of Israel’s conduct in Gaza, they might improve their chances of not being stabbed. Shocking victim-shaming. What other ethnic group is held to that standard?"
Lord Hermer has questions to answer - "Among the more shameful activities of the British judicial system has been the hounding of members of the Armed Forces because of false allegations of committing crimes during combat operations, often dating back decades. Soldiers who served in Northern Ireland 50 years ago, as well as in more recent conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, have been subjected to lengthy and sometimes multiple investigations. In a number of notorious instances, the accusations have been fabricated. The disgraced lawyer Phil Shiner was struck off and convicted of fraud after procuring false evidence against Iraq War veterans in an attempt to win compensation for the alleged victims. As we have reported, Shiner was supported by Lord Hermer, now the Attorney-General, who dismissed warnings that the cases being drawn up were fallacious. He was the lead counsel providing advice on how to pursue the civil claims against the Ministry of Defence. He continued to press for lucrative payouts despite mounting evidence that his eight Iraqi clients were lying about what happened during the so-called Battle of Danny Boy in 2004. The episode left decorated veterans facing false accusations of murder for a decade. The investigations culminated in the Al-Sweady public inquiry, which cost tens of millions of pounds, only to conclude that the allegations were “deliberate lies” driven by “ingrained hostility” towards the British Army. The British troops were fully exonerated and the scandal led to disciplinary investigations into a number of human rights lawyers, including Shiner... The Danny Boy case was part of a pattern of using human rights laws to pursue soldiers that continues to this day. It was revealed this week that members of the Special Air Service regiment are leaving in significant numbers because of concerns that actions taken on operations could later see them investigated or arrested under human rights law. Retrospective legal scrutiny and the application of European human rights law to historic conflicts have created a climate where soldiers now question whether operational decisions made in good faith could later be used against them. This so-called “lawfare” is undermining our elite forces and poses a direct threat to national security, yet it was actively encouraged by the man who is now Attorney-General in a government led by another human rights lawyer. Indeed, as a young barrister in 1997, Sir Keir Starmer called for European human rights laws to be used to investigate British troops in Iraq and was instrumental in extending the ECHR to cover the activities of the Armed Forces for the first time. His Government is also repealing an effective Tory ban on prosecutions of soldiers who served in Northern Ireland during the Troubles. When the Prime Minister talks of his support for the Armed Forces, we should not forget his role and that of other human rights lawyers such as Lord Hermer in this witch hunt."
Zack Polanski liked post claiming Zionists control Government - "Zack Polanski liked several social media posts which accused Sir Keir Starmer of being on the payroll of powerful Jewish people, The Telegraph can reveal. The Green leader liked messages which said Sir Keir was receiving money from “Zionist philanthropists” and asked “how much does Israel pay him?” All of the remarks were posted on Bluesky, a Left-wing social media network that was set up to rival Elon Musk’s X, within the past six months... one person standing for the party referred to Jewish people as “cockroaches”, while others spread conspiracy theories about the Oct 7 attacks and referred to Zionism as “the Nazism of our time”."
Labour to lose Muslim voters - "Muslim voters are deserting Labour with six in 10 prepared to vote for a pro-Gaza independent candidate or the Green Party in Thursday’s council elections, a poll has revealed. If there were a general election tomorrow, only a third of Muslim voters would support Labour under Sir Keir Starmer, down from a high of 80 per cent, according to the poll of 1,006 Muslim adults by JL Partners for the Policy Exchange. The think tank said this would probably cause a wave of new Muslim independent candidates being elected in areas such as Birmingham, Blackburn and Newham. The poll also revealed higher levels of anti-Semitic sentiment among Muslim voters than in the general population, in a sign of growing sectarianism. Data show Muslims are twice as likely as the general British adult population to hold “unfavourable” views about British Jews and believe they have too much power over the media and Parliament... Policy Exchange said this shift was driven by significant divides between the views of British Muslims and other Britons. The data show Muslims prioritise their religious identity over their identity as British citizens... The figures were reversed for the general population with 43 per cent prioritising national identity versus 12 per cent who ranked religious identity as most important... Muslims are five times more likely (25 per cent) than the average Briton (5 per cent) to say that the Israel-Gaza conflict will determine their vote. A quarter of the British Muslims polled had a favourable view of Hamas, versus 28 per cent who held an unfavourable opinion of the terrorist group. They were more likely to have a favourable view of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) than an unfavourable one (23 per cent versus 20 per cent). Nearly a quarter of Muslim respondents (24 per cent) said they believed that violence could be a legitimate response to someone burning the Koran or showing or creating an image of the Prophet Mohammed, compared with 10 per cent of the public. Hostility towards Jewish people was greater amongst Muslims, with 21 per cent admitting that they felt unfavourably towards Jewish people, compared with 11 per cent of the public. Some 45 per cent of Muslims believed Jewish people had too much power over the media and 39 per cent said they had too much power over Parliament, more than double the proportion of people in the country as a whole who share these beliefs. The poll also found that Muslim voters were more often victims of improper election practices. Some 14 per cent of Muslim voters polled said they had had a postal vote collected by a political candidate, activist or campaigner – a practice which is now illegal and was long associated with election fraud. This is almost double the proportion for the general population."
When your attempt to court the Muslim vote fails. Of course, they will double down on the strategy, since they have a common enemy
We are still told that Muslims in the UK are well-integrated
What happened to the Green wave? | The Spectator - "No amount of Labour spin will disguise the party’s dreadful night, but the hefty losses of seats in English council areas are nothing more than was expected. The bigger story of the night is the failure of the Greens to make any meaningful breakthrough. With 40 councils so far declared – a minority, as most did not count votes overnight and will declare this afternoon – the Greens have made a net gain of just 25 seats, less than a tenth of the gains made by Reform UK. They are running at around 18 per cent of the popular vote, while Reform UK are pushing 30 per cent. This matters because for months Zack Polanski and the Greens have been promoted (and not just by themselves) as the mirror image of Nigel Farage and Reform UK: they are supposed to be the insurgent party of the Left to balance Reform as the insurgent party of the Right. There has been talk of them entering government as part of a left-wing coalition after the next election, possibly as the largest party. Yet today’s results show what a forlorn hope that is for the Greens. A genuine insurgent party would have walked it in Tameside and Wigan, yet it was Reform UK which romped home there at Labour’s expense. The Greens are only really doing well in student areas. This shouldn’t come as any great surprise, as they have been leading in the polls among 18 to 24 year olds. Their policies could not be better tuned to stirring student activists: climate change, Palestine, as well as declaring war on billionaires and small-time landlords. Yet their policies, similarly, could not be better calculated to offend Red Wall voters. They want to ban horse-racing and make driving a privilege rather than a right and force motorists to retake a test every five years. Just try selling that to white van man. For the past few decades the Labour party has succeeded in holding together an often unholy alliance of low paid working people and aggrieved minorities: the broke and the woke. They deftly found the language to win support, for example, from both gay rights activists and socially-conservative Muslims, even though those interests might seem to be diametrically opposed. Polanski’s Greens, by contrast, have no such political skills. They have made a loud noise by appealing only to the woke side of Labour’s fragile coalition. That is no basis to win a general election."
I know why Nigel Farage & Reform are so popular & why Labour & the Tories just don't get it, says Sir Trevor Phillips - "“FRANKLY, if you want people to vote for you, I don’t think the best way is to start by telling them that the guys they’ve just voted for are stupid and racist . . . and then we wonder why they hate us.”... The broadcaster, who was knighted for his services to equality and human rights, tells The Sun, “Something very profound has taken place in this country”, with Labour and the Conservatives “oddly enough the people who are the last to have grasped this”. The self-confessed North London lefty, who once advised Tony Blair and ran the Equality and Human Rights Commission from 2007 until 2012, says the results must surely now be the long-overdue wake-up call for Britain’s political elite. “We haven’t really grasped until recently how deeply traumatic de-industrialisation has been for this country,” Phillips warns. “Most of those towns are working-class, they are white and their experience is completely different to the cosmopolitan cities of London, Manchester or Birmingham. “The way they see the world is just very different to the way I would see the world, living in North London, and people like us in North London literally haven’t got it. “We look down on those people and tell them, ‘If you vote for such and such, don’t you understand you’re voting for bigotry or racism or backwardness?’, which is almost the same as saying, ‘You’re a bigot and you’re backward’.” On top of the decline of British industry, Phillips argues the infusion of mass migration has caused a rupture in our politics that the old order has spectacularly failed to grasp, with already devastating consequences. Yet he is clear he does not believe Sir Keir Starmer has the first idea about what to do about it, slamming the smug arrogance of a government that “believed that because they thought of themselves as better people, that everybody would be grateful to them for replacing the Tories and that that would be enough”... And he says the PM’s interviews, since last Thursday’s ballot-box thumping, show that he still does not get it — paraphrasing Starmer’s response as: “The biggest mistake we’ve made is not to say loudly and clearly enough that we have been right about everything. “But what we’re going to do now is we’re going to tell people more clearly that we’re great and that everybody else is either a bigot or clueless.” So what is his advice for a political class in the capital that is now obsessing over the latest twists and turns of the Westminster leadership parlour game, wondering whether Labour will finally listen to the public or retreat to the comfort zone of the Left? “Never bet against Nigel Farage. This is a man with extraordinary patience and shrewdness, with a capacity — probably unequalled by anybody since Tony Blair — to just intuitively understand where the country’s centre of gravity is. “He’s demonstrated in his success, and it’s undoubtedly a success, that he understood the mood and the sentiment of the country better than anybody else in politics.”... Phillips says it’s “striking” that only Farage is dominating geographically and “it is objectively the case that there is only one party which competes across England, Scotland and Wales — and that is Reform.” Surveying the new reality, he says: “The Tories are nowhere in the North. Labour doesn’t figure in the South West. It’s almost been wiped out in Wales, the place of its birth. “It’s lost in the North West. The Greens only win in London, Brighton, Cambridge and places where there is a big university. “The only party which appears to be able to compete in all those spheres is Reform. Now what does that tell you? It tells you that we are a country which is ‘Balkanised’ — where the experiences of people in different situations are very different.”... Balkanisation doesn’t just mean diversity. It means communities living side by side, but not together... Add to that decline the effects of mass migration and a lack of integration and Phillips argues, Britain is dangerously siloed. He says: “What I had not myself grasped until maybe last year — and I should have been the first to see it — is that once migrant communities get to a certain size, there is no particular incentive for some of them to integrate with everybody else. “There’s a number, 100,000 or thereabouts, the Office for National Statistics defines as a large town. “We did some work on this and we discovered that there are about 30 groups of more than 100,000 people who come from the same background — Romanians, people from Poland, people from West Africa, Ghana and Nigeria, and they are big enough communities to be what we call semi-autonomous. “They can have their own businesses, places of worship, their own social setting, their own media, and they cluster together. And they can live inside those communities. “And that’s a problem, both for people inside the communities, and also for people outside the communities who think, ‘What is this? Are these people in the same country as we are? Are they adopting the same habits we are?’ “And in some cases the answer is yes, but in some cases the answer is not yet. And that is, I think, the relationship between mass migration and fragmentation.” And Sir Trevor warns that political correctness has got in the way of integration, warning we have “got ourselves into a place where we have so misinterpreted what is meant by multiculturalism that our institutions are allowing behaviours which are not just alien but dangerous”. He says we must all “be a bit less shy about telling people there are things that we tolerate and things that we don’t”... And he warns that too often this dangerous adherence to political correctness and a timidity in calling out problems has already been fatal. “Going back, you will remember Victoria Climbie, the little girl who was murdered by relatives, and there was a similar case recently, a little girl called Sara Sharif . . . Axel Rudakubana, the Southport case — social services, it is said, did not want to intervene because of the culture of the family concerned. “Now, there is no culture that should be immune to intervention when it involves cruelty to children or risk to life.”"
David Betz on X - "I couldn’t care less about the King’s Speech, Kier Starmer’s fate, or who takes over the helm in No 10 next. It’s low theatre at this point because none of them can, or show any sign of wishing, to steer the ship away from violent collision with reality. Britain was decisively and obviously off course from anything functionally democratic or economically viable long before Gordon Brown snuck the Lisbon Treaty through Parliament in the dead of night. By then the rot was already advanced, but that act of constitutional sleight-of-hand crystallised it: sovereignty quietly auctioned off to Brussels while the public was told to look the other way. The 2008 crash slammed a lid on real wage growth for anyone not already in the asset-owning class; the military, hollowed out by endless expeditionary wars and procurement disasters, was in a shit state fifteen years ago and has only atrophied further. By 2012 the writing was on the wall with mass migration—its demographic, cultural and economic effects plain to anyone not paid to ignore them. Police quality has been systematically trashed by Theresa May’s reforms and the deliberate evisceration of Special Branch, turning what was once a recognisably British constabulary into something closer to a politically compliant and social-work bureaucracy, parts of which played a vile and still unpunished role in the rape gangs The 2016 Brexit referendum was not some xenophobic spasm; it was a national demand for a government that would finally put the interests of the people of these islands first. Instead the political establishment and the permanent bureaucracy launched a decade-long campaign of sabotage and rearguard action, determined that nothing fundamental would change. Keir Starmer is not a good man and he is certainly not a good Prime Minister, but the brutal truth is that none of them will be better. The system cannot fix itself. It is too incompetent, too captured, and too corrupt. The local election results last week confirmed precisely the political and social dynamics I have been diagnosing for years. Voters in traditional Labour and Conservative heartlands delivered a stinging rebuke to the establishment parties that presided over high migration, cultural displacement and stagnant living standards. Reform UK became the vehicle for native discontent, its gains in working-class northern and Midlands seats signalling exactly the cross-class, regional backlash I have described: a tripartite divide between those who still believe in the nation and those who do not. Polarisation, fragmentation, the splintering of the old two-party cartel, all of it illustrates the breakdown of democratic consent and the rise of identity-driven politics that are the classic preconditions for deeper conflict. One could pretend this is healthy democratic pressure relief. It is not. Electoral revolt is an early symptom, not a cure. The structural drivers, including mass migration, elite refusal to acknowledge cultural incompatibility, economic decline, are too deeply embedded for conventional politics to address. Reform may win seats, but the unelected bureaucracy, the courts, the media and the NGOs will obstruct, delay and dilute any real change. The establishment’s preferred candidate is now the one-time “controlled opposition” because the system is that desperate. Meanwhile the problems metastasise faster than any promised reform can catch up. Hard to get excited, then, about whatever announcements limp out of the King’s Speech. They will not survive contact with reality if we ever get an actually British government staffed by competent, responsible people accountable to the country and to duty rather than to supranational ideology or personal advancement. If we do not get that government, the country will not survive in any recognisable form."
Smoking ban for people born after 2008 in the UK agreed
Left wingers love to control people. Of course, the Tory sugar tax is proof that they were a "conservative" government and not, as Badenoch admitted, talking right and governing left
Green MSP: I couldn’t wait for late Queen to kick the bucket - "A new Green MSP previously posted online that they could not wait for the late Queen Elizabeth II to “kick the bucket”, it has emerged. Iris Duane, a biological male who uses she/her pronouns, referred to the late Queen as “big lizard Lizzie” in a social media post in January 2022... Duane, who was elected as a Glasgow MSP on Friday, wrote: “I cannot wait till big lizard Lizzie kicks the bucket, not because she’s dead but because of the absolute meltdown it will cause the British consciousness.” The Scottish Greens said the tweet was “intended as a joke” and had since been deleted."
