L'origine de Bert

Get email updates of new posts:        (Delivered by FeedBurner)

Tuesday, May 17, 2022

Links - 17th May 2022 (1 - George Floyd Unrest: the UK)

Sainsbury's worker, 52, sacked after picking up a cuddly toy and saying 'Black Lives Matter' - "The co-worker who made the complaint against Ms Cunnington thought she heard her say: 'I'm offended Black Lives Matter?'."

Parliamentary staff write poems about their privilege after Black Lives Matter protests - "Parliamentary staff have been urged to admit their 'privilege' through an online platform that has been set up in the wake of the Black Lives Matter protests.Officials have reportedly been issued with an 'inclusivity toolkit' by senior figures which encourages white workers to acknowledge their 'internalised racism'.The digital wall was set up by Parliament's diversity group Parli-REACH for staff to profess their privilege, write poetry and give their 'support' for Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) colleagues... This comes soon after staff were given advice on how to support Black Lives Matter protests, such as 'attending protests and social media use'... One person posted on the platform arguing that staff could no longer watch American comedy series Brooklyn Nine-Nine, which stars Andy Samberg, because it sold a 'cosy lie' about policing."

Warwick Labour Society on Twitter - "We are disgusted by the recent interview @Keir_Starmer gave to BBC Breakfast. To say that defunding the police is ‘nonsense’ is a slap in the face to all the Black academics and activists who have been working on conceptualising a just society for so long. (1/4)"
Warwick Labour Society on Twitter - "Vote Labour on May 5th in Police and Crime Commissioner elections to fight against police cuts and increased crime"
What a difference a few years makes

Sargon of Akkad - Posts | Facebook - "The killing of Matt Ratana was horrible, and it’s understandable that other police officers are devastated. But this is a far right meme and it’s extremely disturbing that a police force has tweeted it out."
"Being against murdering the police is far right now."

Paint it black: UK postboxes change colour to honour Black Britons - "Four of Britain’s distinctive red postboxes have been painted black and gold and adorned with images by or of illustrious Black Britons, in a novel way of celebrating Black History Month... The Royal Mail is the latest institution to have engaged with Britain’s Black heritage in recent months, jolted by the Black Lives Matter movement and by the toppling of the statue of a slave trader by protesters in the city of Bristol in June.Among other changes, another slave trader statue was removed by officials in London, a concert hall in Bristol renamed itself and a charity that runs hundreds of grand country estates published an in-depth report about how the properties benefitted from slavery and colonialism.The trend has been met with a backlash, with parts of the media and some politicians dismissing it as “wokery”. The government has warned a number of major cultural institutions including the British Museum that their public funding could be called into question should they remove statues or other contentious objects."
Uhh

Please don’t import the US culture war to Britain - "No doubt, these lockdown rule-breakers are also the very same activists who would describe Covid-19’s disproportionate impact on the UK’s black population as a national scandal.The left in the UK, desperate to be a part of the anger and frustration felt by its counterparts abroad, has sought to frame police brutality and police-led racial abuse as a common UK-US problem. They have sought to strike parallels between the deaths of George Floyd and Mark Duggan in 2011. The comparison is insulting. Duggan was a hardened gang member who was once accused of shooting a man in a nightclub. And while policing in the UK needs a great deal of improvement, comparisons with the US are unwise. (It is also worth noting that significant numbers of white Americans have also been victims of law enforcement aggression.)Ethnic minorities in Britain are broadly trusting of the police. According to the most recent Crime Survey for England and Wales, seven in 10 black people in the UK had confidence in their local police force, which is not far below the corresponding figure for white people (75 per cent). This is an inconvenient truth for those leftists shouting ‘fuck the police’, apparently on behalf of ethnic minorities.According to the 2010 EMBES survey – one of the largest surveys of minority attitudes available – the vast majority of ethnic-minority Brits say they are satisfied with British democracy more broadly. Indeed, more BAME Brits are ‘very satisfied’ with UK democracy than white Brits... certain elements of the British left are eager for a more racially divided, structurally unjust Britain, in order to have the ammunition to press ahead with their moral crusade, inspired by US culture wars.A particularly chilling aspect of the US culture wars is left-wing ‘anti-whiteness’, which is finding a home within the contemporary British left. Despite telling us they are keen to create a racism-free society, anti-white sentiment is now being normalised among radical left activists in the UK. This is true not only of activists of an ethnic-minority background, but also of middle-class Guardianistas who feel ‘white guilt’. Such circles are ironically guilty of acts of racism, such as ordering white people not to participate in race-related debates. While portraying themselves as social-justice warriors fighting institutional racism, few have much to say on the mismanagement of large-scale cases of child sexual abuse across much of England which has strained race relations."

The Yaboiposting - Posts - "You have to feel bad for the British police normally at this this time of year they would be twerking with drag queens at pride."

That moment, when you are from India/Pakistan and live in London, but African people are screaming to you that you have to stop violence in the USA.

BBC denies 'softening' Black Lives Matter protest picture - "The BBC has denied underplaying the level of violence during the Black Lives Matter protests after an image of a man threatening police officers was apparently cut out of the corporation’s coverage.Social media users pointed out yesterday that a picture taken during London’s demonstrations had been cropped to remove a man apparently brandishing a large piece of wood at a line of police.It came as the BBC came under criticism for an online story initially headlined: “27 police officers injured during largely peaceful protests anti-racism protests in London”.The story was later changed to: 'George Floyd: London anti-racism protests leave 27 officers hurt'... “How can an event that has left 27 police officers injured merit the description ‘largely peaceful’?”Colin Sutton, a former senior investigating officer at the Metropolitan Police, accused the BBC of “chicanery” after an image of the violence was apparently altered."
Comment: "Could you imagine what the narrative would be if 27 police officers were injured at a pro Brexit rally?"

Boris Johnson issues warning during statement on Black Lives Matter protests - "the Prime Minister accused thugs of “hijacking” the wave of Black Lives Matter demonstrations following the killing of George Floyd in the US. “I will not support or indulge those who break the law, or attack the police, or desecrate public monuments,” he wrote. “Those who attack public property or the police – who injure the police officers who are trying to keep us all safe – those people will face the full force of the law.” Mr Johnson also criticised the mass protests for risking a fresh surge in coronavirus infections by “flouting” social-distancing rules.His broadside followed a weekend of protests across the UK that saw police attacked in London, graffiti sprayed on the plinth of a statue of Winston Churchill in Parliament Square and a 125-year-old bronze of slave trader Edward Colston toppled and hurled into Bristol harbour... “We have a democracy in this country. If you want to change the urban landscape, you can stand for election, or vote for someone who will.”He said violent protesters were “hijacking a peaceful protest and undermining it in the eyes of many who might otherwise be sympathetic.”"
How ironic that all the people who fantasise about "punching 'Nazis'" have such disdain for Churchill - who did more to fight Nazis than they ever will

BLM protests: Met Police boss 'sickened' by abuse against officers across UK - ""If bottles and fireworks are being thrown at our police officers, we should have public order equipment on. No ifs. No buts. Our colleagues' safety should be of paramount importance to our police leaders."... John Apter, the chairman of the Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers in England and Wales, criticised Avon and Somerset Police for its decision not to intervene in the protest."

Black Lives Matter: Police condemn 'violent criminality' at UK protests - 35 officers hurt - "Of the 35 injuries, two of the officers required hospital treatment... one person was seen to climb the Cenotaph and attempted to burn the Union Jack.Some demonstrators also threw bottles and a flares towards officers... "When officers sought to protect colleagues and iconic landmarks they faced further obstruction and sustained assault."The violent criminality we saw is disgraceful and will have been very frightening for others."It will never be acceptable to attack police officers, damage property and leave others in fear of their safety... "We have had enough warnings. The tactics being used by the Metropolitan Police are very wrong."

UK cop thrown from horse during violent Black Lives Matter protest - "A British cop was flung from her horse after crashing into traffic lights as it bolted during a violent Black Lives Matter protest — leaving her with a collapsed lung and broken ribs... Disturbing video shows the police horse taking off as protesters hurled bottles and even a bike at it outside Downing Street"

Boris Johnson - Posts | Facebook - "Why attack Churchill? What has the world come to when one of this country’s greatest ever leaders – perhaps our greatest - has to be shielded from the wrath of the mob?... Where will it end? Are we supposed to haul down Cromwell who killed so many thousands of people in Ireland? What about Nelson and all the other innumerable reminders of this country’s imperial past? Take the case of Ayuba Suleiman Diallo, whose portrait hangs in Room 15 of the National Portrait Gallery. He was a native of the Gambia who was known and admired in C18 London as a translator of Arab texts. He was also, originally, a slaver himself. Does that mean he should be purged from the Gallery?... As it happens, he generally changed with the times. He changed his view on India, and her capacity for independence; and whatever he may have said about Islam in the 1890s, he also built the Regent’s Park Mosque in the 1940s. And above all – as so many have rightly pointed out – it is the height of lunacy to accuse him of racism, when he stood alone against a racist tyranny that without his resistance would have overwhelmed this country and the rest of Europe... It is not just that is wrong to destroy public property by violence. I am also extremely dubious about the growing campaign to edit or photoshop the entire cultural landscape. If we start purging the record and removing the images of all but those whose attitudes conform to our own, we are engaged in a great lie, a distortion of our history – like some public figure furtively trying to make themselves look better by editing their own Wikipedia entry.Would it not be better and more honest to ask our children to understand the context, to explain the mixture of good and bad in the career of Churchill and everyone else? And rather than tear some people down, we should build others up, and celebrate the people who we in this generation believe are worthy of memorial."
Liberals pretend that antifa is following in the footsteps of the fight against Nazism, while villifying one of that fight's greatest figures (when they aren't villifying WWII veterans as being old, straight, white men)

Soldiers from Household Cavalry heckled as they clean up after protesters deface war memorial - "Soldiers from the Household Cavalry were heckled by a group of protesters as they cleaned graffiti daubed on a Whitehall war memorial during the Black Lives Matter march"

Black Lives Matter latest news: Priti Patel vows to brings 'yobs' to 'justice' after protests turned violent in London - "Bristol's police chief has defended his officers for not intervening to stop protesters pulling down the statue of slave trader Edward Colston... Avon and Somerset Police have launched a criminal damage investigation into what happened to the statue, which has long been a source of controversy in the city where it has been situated since 1895.Chief constable Andy Marsh said that had his officers intervened to arrest those responsible there would have been a “very violent confrontation”... the mainstream media rushed to report supposedly independent findings that 93 percent of BLM protests were peaceful and non-destructive, and that police intervened in more BLM protests than non-BLM protests Amazon boss Jeff Bezos has said he is “happy to lose” any customers who oppose the Black Lives Matter movement...
“Marching and protesting is one thing, but when thugs and yobbos turn around and try to disrupt public order, that's a completely different kettle of fish.“[Winston Churchill] stood behind this country in 1939 when parliament almost turned its back on him and it's thanks to him that we've not got a different statue there.“It could have been a fascist dictator stood there today and there could be swastikas flying.”...
Thousands of people are demanding the removal of controversial monuments and statues around the UK, which campaigners describe as “racist and unwelcoming”... One such petition, which has amassed more than 26,000 signatures, demands the removal of a caricature of a black man atop the 18th century Greenman pub sign in Ashbourne, Derbyshire.The Grade II-listed sign, which arches over St John's Street, depicts the face of a black man, which one 20-year-old anthropology student from the town, who did not want to be named, said resembled a gollywog, a 19th century rag doll which is largely considered racist."
How to get a free pass to commit crime in the UK
Strange how despite being a big "antifascist", Churchill isn't lionised by liberals unlike all the American soldiers who supposedly punched Nazis

Sadiq Khan on Twitter - "To the thousands of Londoners who protested peacefully today: I stand with you - and I share your anger and your pain. To the tiny minority who were violent - you endangered a safe and peaceful protest and let down this important cause. #BlackLivesMatter"
Sadiq Khan on Twitter - "This is totally unacceptable. We will not tolerate attacks on our police and perpetrators will feel the full force of the law. It is clear that far right groups are causing violence and disorder in central London, I urge people to stay away."
Naturally.

Man charged with arson after Pride flag was burnt in Brighton - "Moulay Abdelhakim Ismaili, 36, of Beaconsfield Road, Brighton, was detained on suspicion of committing a homophobic hate-related crime after a Pride flag was taken from a garden in Beaconsfield Road and burned at about 9.55pm."
No wonder they can't catch the people destroying so much public property

Police Federation Accuses Khan of Failing to Look After London Cops - "The head of London’s policing union has criticised Labour mayor Sadiq Khan for failing to protect the city’s police officers by allowing what became violent protests to take place despite coronavirus lockdown measures.The chairman of the Metropolitan Police Federation, Ken Marsh, revealed on Sunday that a total of 62 Met police officers were injured at Black Lives Matter protests in the past week...  “Why didn’t he shut the Tube when he knew this was going to happen?“Leaders at tough times like this need to lead. He’s been a great advocate for the lockdown, but when it comes to this, he’s done nothing.“How’s that for looking after your coppers? I’m bewildered.”... Sky News shot footage of a police officer walking alone down Whitehall with blood running down his head, with dozens of reinforcements running in the opposite direction.Black Lives Matter extremists chased another group of officers down Whitehall, pelting them with glass bottles and garbage while yelling, “run, piggy, run” before the unarmed officers sought shelter in the grounds of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office... The London officers were attacked despite some of their colleagues taking the knee in solidarity with Black Lives Matter protesters. Mr Marsh told The Times that the country was operating under two sets of rules, with one for the law-abiding and the other for the far-left protesters. He said: “We are in the middle of a pandemic killing thousands of people. My colleagues don’t have any choice to be there. Lots of them may now catch Covid-19. There are several sets of rules going on in this country right now.” The Defund the BBC campaign’s Twitter page has gained 58,000 followers since Sunday after the taxpayer-funded broadcaster described the weekend’s protests which resulted in so much brutality against police as “largely peaceful”."

Sargon of Akkad - Posts | Facebook - "Sadiq Khan told that 'black officers were attacked' by Black Lives Matter protestors"
"Boris and Priti called them thugs and Sadiq defended the BLM instigators never forget that."

Sargon of Akkad - Posts | Facebook - "Taking the knee: ... those who do not do so may become the focus of the protesters attention... This has a very positive and engaging effect and when taken by officers, has a positive reaction on the protest groups"
"The British police response to BLM protests was not to ban knee taking to protect all officers and remain apolitical.  But to throw non woke officers under the bus, great."

Man jailed for urinating at PC Keith Palmer memorial during protest - "Andrew Banks, 28, of Stansted, Essex, was photographed during Saturday's right-wing protests in London.  He was sentenced to 14 days in custody, after pleading guilty to outraging public decency at Westminster Magistrates' Court."
Of course, the leftist mobs essentially got a free pass

Imperial College told to remove bust of slavery abolitionist because he ‘might now be called racist’ - "Imperial College London has been told to remove a bust of slavery abolitionist Thomas Henry Huxley because he “might now be called racist”, following a review into colonial links.  An independent history group for the Russell Group university has recommended that a bust of the renowned 19th century biologist, dubbed “Darwin’s bulldog”, be taken down and the Huxley Building on campus renamed...   The report also said the Beit Hall and Beit Quad should be renamed because these benefactors to the college, Alfred and Otto Beit, gained their fortune from diamond and gold mining in South Africa.">
First, they came for the Confederate Generals...

Black Lives Matter training among new diversity courses offered to NHS staff - "NHS England staff are being offered training on the Black Lives Matter movement despite the Health Secretary’s crackdown on "wokery"... New diversity courses available for health and care staff on the NHS People website cover white privilege, unconscious bias, "authentic allyship" and the intersectionality between race and gender... The latest diversity drive comes despite Sajid Javid, the Health Secretary, telling parliamentarians this month he would be “watchful for any waste or wokery” from the NHS following the tax hike to fund healthcare. A Government insider raised concern that the NHS description of BLM failed to mention the contentious calls from some supporters to defund the police.“Managers, nurses and doctors are being indoctrinated with deadly doses of dodgy diversity and pernicious propaganda — all at the taxpayers’ expense,” a Whitehall source said.In another of the four NHS People diversity courses, medics are warned: "You may lose 'friends' as you commit to anti-racist allyship"... The revelations come after it emerged that the NHS diversity tsar Prerana Issar, the chief people officer, earned £35,000 more than the recently departed NHS chief executive...  Sir John Hayes, the chairman of the Common Sense Group of more than 50 Tory MPs, has written to Mr Javid asking whether taxpayers’ money is being “squandered on woke propaganda”.He labelled it “grossly inappropriate” for the health service to be “propagating the work of radical critical race theorists and peddling the dangerously divisive notions of collective racial guilt and collective racial oppression”.His letter was prompted by a blog post on the NHS Leadership Academy website, titled “Dear white people in the UK”, which advised white staff to be uncomfortable when discussing issues of race.The Telegraph then revealed how NHS leaders had been told in a series of online seminars on “whiteness” and racial justice this year that speaking with a “cottage cream-thick English accent” was an example of privilege."

A slave owner or a peninsula? Debate after BLM group launch protest against 'Penrhyn' street name - "A decision by a Black Lives Matter protest group to protest the name of a street in the Barry has spurred debate online after some argued that it was a common Welsh language place name.  A protest on Saturday by Stand Up to Racism Cardiff and Black Lives Matter Cardiff and Vale will call on Vale of Glamorgan Council to change the “disgusting” and “shameful” name of ‘Ffordd Penrhyn’ in Barry.   The protestors say that the street has the same name as Penrhyn Castle, which was built the Pennant Family who made their money from the transatlantic slave trade.  Others, however, have argued that as ‘penrhyn’ is the Welsh word for ‘peninsula’ and that the road in Barry leads to a peninsula, there is no clear link with the Pennant family.  Penrhyn Castle itself is so named because it stands on a peninsula. Richard Pennant and later Edward Douglas-Pennant were given the title Baron Penrhyn."

Oxford University college votes to remove portrait of the Queen from common room - "The Education Secretary today slammed the 'absurd' cancelling of the Queen by Oxford students, who voted to take down an 'unwelcoming' portrait of the monarch from the graduates' common room because 'she represents recent colonial history'.  Members of the Middle Common Room (MCR) at Magdalen College passed the measure by a substantial majority, with one student commenting that 'patriotism and colonialism are not really separable'. Expressing his outrage, Gavin Williamson tweeted: 'Oxford University students removing a picture of the Queen is simply absurd. She is the Head of State and a symbol of what is best about the UK. 'During her long reign she has worked tirelessly to promote British values of tolerance, inclusivity and respect around the world.'   Oxford's vice-chancellor Lord Patten also weighed in, calling the decision 'offensive and obnoxiously ignorant'.  The committee will now explore replacing the portrait with 'art by or of other influential and inspirational people' and subject any future depictions of the Royal Family to a vote, according to committee minutes that have not been published... The decision sparked an immediate backlash, with the president of Magdalen College swiftly moving to distance the institution itself from the students involved. It comes amid growing concern at the rise of intolerance and 'cancel culture' at British universities... Twitter user Samantha Smith said: 'The Queen was a pioneer of anti-racism in an era of widespread segregation and apartheid. Imagine trying to cancel the reigning monarch.'... Left-wingers working at King's College London reacted angrily to an email bulletin they received after the Duke's death in April, featuring a photograph of him opening the university's Maughan Library with the Queen in 2002.  Following weeks of simmering tensions, Joleen Clarke, the associate director at King's College libraries, sent out an extraordinary apology for the 'harm' caused by including the photo in her email...
All Souls College in January removed the name of an 18th century slave trader from its main library but defied calls to take down his statue.   The college reviewed its link to Christopher Codrington, a Barbados-born colonial governor, in the wake of last year's Black Lives Matter movement... It came as new Church of England guidance, published last month, urged churches and cathedrals to consider the history of their buildings and the physical artefacts and how it could impact their congregations' worship.   Churches that have already taken action include St Margaret's church in Rottingdean, Sussex, which has removed two 'deeply offensive' grave headstones which contained racial slurs.  St Peter's Church in Dorchester has also covered a plaque commemorating a plantation owner."
We're still told that liberals don't hate their countries

Oxford student who led move to remove Queen's portrait is American - "Katzman is the son of commercial lawyer Scott Katzman, 65, who lives in a DC mansion worth more than $5.5 million, according to the Mail.  He previously attended the $48,000-a-year Sidwell Friends School, a historic Quaker private college — where the Mail says he “likely” counted former President Barack Obama’s 22-year-old daughter Malia as a contemporary.  Her younger sister, Sasha, also went there, as did Nancy Reagan, Chelsea Clinton, President Biden’s grandchildren and the offspring of other presidents, including Theodore Roosevelt and Richard Nixon.  His total education has cost at least $640,000... Katzman is also seen in photos on social media with a Captain America shield, alongside the Stars and Stripes.  But the computer sciences scholar insisted to the outlet that removing the portrait did not “equate to a statement on the Queen.”  “The royal family is on display in many areas of the college, and it was ultimately agreed that it was an unnecessary addition to the common room,” he said.  “It was decided that the room should be a welcoming, neutral place for all members regardless of background, demographic, or views”...   Magdalen College — which has distanced itself from the vote — had long been “solidly royalist,” with its famous alumni including King Edward VIII, and the Queen herself getting an honorary degree in 1948. The monarch also visited in 2008 to mark its 550th anniversary."

When students are passing motions to abolish the monarchy, I fear for the future of the Royal family - "It was a privilege to justify the monarchy’s existence in the hallowed debating chamber, founded in 1823 to protect against the university’s restrictive rules surrounding the discussion of religion and politics – sound familiar? – and to champion freedom of speech, currently much curtailed today.  Following in the footsteps of former speakers Winston Churchill, the Dalai Lama, Mother Teresa and Margaret Thatcher is an undisputed thrill, even if your stomach lurches in anxious anticipation of facing the largely left wing, “woke” student body... Charlie, on a military scholarship to Oxford and joshed by fellow students for having a framed portrait of the Queen in his bedroom, was passionate about the relationship between the armed forces and the monarchy, inspiring young people to serve their country. He admirably set out our stall to the other side, citing the benefits of the Crown – its diplomatic soft power, valuable tourist draw and political advantage of having a neutral head of state – and concluded that, while it may well be seen today as absurd and anachronistic, constitutional monarchies are happier and more stable... Graham Smith, CEO of Republic, a pressure group which campaigns for the abolition of the UK monarchy presented the Queen as if she was the David Walliam’s character, Gangster Granny. She was portrayed as lolling in her lavish lair, unscrupulously ripping off her subjects. The Royal family was “a racist institution by default” bellowed besuited Mr Smith. As well as being “anti Catholic”, it was “immoral, unethical, wrong in principle and corrupt”. He cited historians as describing the monarchy as “more secretive than M15” because they kept the royal archives at Kew, vetting access to them. Dr Ken Ritchie, the founder of Labour for a Republic, a Labour-affiliated pressure group, agitated over the monarchy “reinforcing the social pecking order”, urging us to rid them of their “social status and power”.   They exist, he told us, in a bubble of privilege “against the background of huge numbers of people struggling to make ends meet”. The monarchy, he insisted, “doesn’t recognise this”. Surely, if anyone knows about economic disparity in Britain, it is the highest working members of the Royal family, who tour the country, visiting its every impoverished nook and cranny?   I spoke last, weighing in against Mr Smith and his inaccurate Marie-Antoinette caricature of the Windsors. Yes, they are a dysfunctional family but they are our dysfunctional family. Yes, the Sussexes are divisive but the Cambridges are a unifying force. Princess Anne and the Queen have a dizzying work schedule; Her Majesty is diplomatic, experienced, hardworking and, in times of crisis, brilliantly binds the nation. Instead of the status, subjugation and superiority that the republicans hammered home, they should consider the service of senior royals."

I spoke up for the Queen at Oxford's debate... and was jeered - "When I proposed that the Queen was an inspiring feminist, I was booed, and later jeered for suggesting that instead of watering down the trappings of the monarchy, we should consider that nowhere in the world can replicate our crowd-swelling pomp and pageantry.  I can’t remember any roar of applause when I said that the Queen represents continuity and stability, brilliantly binding our nation. And that while Prince Philip was her strength and stay, to abolish the monarchy would be to rid the country of its own strength and stay. I did get some laughs when I explained that the Queen was Britain’s best trade ambassador given the advantages of a Royal warrant to business.  Weary of the earlier endless slurs that the Queen and the Royal family were racist, I then braved the view we had no actual evidence of this. I suggested that Meghan was positioning herself on the world stage exactly where she wanted to be, so she could reign as an anti-establishment heroine to her adoring woke subjects. This was met with gasps of horror. As we know from Piers Morgan’s fate at GMB, to challenge Meghan these days is to commit heresy... Due to the insistence by the young that their views are sacrosanct, there is no longer room for nuance, to point out that institutions like the monarchy and the empire need to be allowed to further evolve, not to be abolished. Or if those voices do exist, they are a scared whisper. The painting of the Queen wasn’t hung in Magdalen until 2013, after the same committee campaigned to put it up, but less than 10 years later, a world where a student would campaign to do such a thing is barely imaginable.  Paradoxically, part of the reason that the British monarchy has survived is because it is the antithesis of woke. It hasn’t adopted fashionable causes but has remained solidly anachronistic. Its stability has come from its refusal to be swayed by the hysteria of the day. But this war against the monarchy and everything it represents to the younger generations, so quick to take offence and soak up distortions, is gaining worrying momentum.   At the end of the debate, Oxford undergraduates passed the motion to abolish the monarchy by 79 votes to 57. How ironic if Meghan and Harry’s truth bombs are what finally obliterates it when their own lives of privilege – including Harry’s trust fund and Meghan’s fame – are built on the very Crown that they readily repudiate."

Oxford Student Newspaper to Employ “Sensitivity Readers” to Prevent “Problematic” Articles - "The Oxford Student Union (OXSU) is to set up a ‘Student Consultancy of Sensitivity Readers’ which will be tasked with vetting student newspaper articles."

Oxford University professor suggests ‘decolonising’ music syllabus to make it... - "Oxford music academic proposes to “decolonise the syllabus” and make the subject more inclusive following pressure from Black Lives Matter demonstrations.  A professor from one of the world’s leading universities is hoping to “decolonise” its degree-level music offering and enhance the diversity of the undergraduate curriculum.  In documents seen by The Telegraph, an academic from the University of Oxford proposed a lighter focus on Euro-American elite music, “arising from international Black Lives Matter demonstrations”.  They said they want to address the “white hegemony” in Oxford’s music syllabus, and to better represent other forms of music.  Possible changes to undergraduate courses include reducing the focus on canonic classical composers like Mozart and Beethoven, in a proposed move away from “white European music from the slave period”.  It was reported that the professor questioning the music curriculum’s “complicity in white supremacy” also proposed a lighter focus on western music notation, allegedly described in the documents as a “colonialist representational system”... the faculty member also suggested learning skills like playing the piano, or conducting orchestras, should no longer be compulsory. They said these skills “structurally centre [around] white European music”, causing some “students of colour great distress”.  Documents also highlight the issue of an “almost all-white faculty” giving “privilege to white musics”."

Oxford University staff propose to 'rethink' teaching sheet music because of its 'complicity in white supremacy' - "Western music, however, has been a long evolving art form that, as the Telegraph notes, predates the trans Atlantic slave trade entirely. Music evolved along with the Catholic church and was about worship of the divine. Musical notation does not even have its origin in the west.  The first known musical notation was found on a cuneiform tablet from ancient Iraq, then known as Babylonia. That tablet is now some 4,000 years old. That first notated song is known as the Hurrian Hymn No. 6, and because a fragment of it has survived in notation, it is able to be recreated today."

Monday, May 16, 2022

Links - 16th May 2022 (2 - Elon Musk and Twitter)

Roundup: Who’s Back On Twitter After Musk Buyout, And Who Deleted Their Account - "A slew of conservative accounts came back to Twitter Monday, following news that Tesla founder Elon Musk has reached a deal to purchase the Left-wing site.  Fox News host Tucker Carlson tweeted simply, “We’re back.”... Fellow Fox News host Mark Levin came back to the site... Anti-lockdown group Truckers For Freedom, which was banned from Twitter, came back to the platform... Actor Michael Caine, who was a supporter of Brexit and has voted conservative, sparked some attention on Twitter, too, when he posted for the first time in months... former President Donald Trump, who had his account permanently suspended in January 2021, said he will not return to the platform if his account is reinstated.  Instead, Trump said, he will use his own social media platform Truth Social. “I am not going on Twitter, I am going to stay on Truth,” the former president told Fox News. “I hope Elon buys Twitter because he’ll make improvements to it and he is a good man, but I am going to be staying on Truth. The bottom line is, no, I am not going back to Twitter.”"

Elon Musk’s Actions At Tesla Could Signal Trouble For Twitter’s Leftist Employees - "Business Insider reported that a new book about Musk’s management style at Tesla highlighted that “when an employee disagreed with the CEO they were often fired.”  “For example, a paint shop manager was fired on the spot when he told Musk his production goals were not possible, and Kate Pearson, an executive in charge of delivery operations, was ousted for saying it was not feasible to hit Tesla’s delivery goal of 100,000 during the quarter,” the report said. “By 2017, Musk began flying to Tesla’s Gigafactory to frequently address issues that often led to verbal spats. Longtime Tesla employees told [the book’s author] Musk’s fury was unpredictable and often focused on public humiliation.”"

Watch: CNN’s Brian Stelter is SO angry that Twitter might have “total freedom for everybody” 😂🤡 - "Marxist wokies always need a captive audience in order to advance their unpopular ideas."

Tech employees are much more liberal than their employers — at least as far as the candidates they support - "  The vast majority of those donations went to Democrats. The most extreme examples were Netflix ($321,000) and Twitter ($228,000), which had about 99 percent of employee donations go to Dems.
Employee donations to midterm candidates by party"
Hillel Neuer on Twitter - "I fear Elon Musk could undermine the ideological diversity, equity and inclusion at Twitter which currently maintains a careful balance of 98.7% for one side."

Mary Margaret Olohan on Twitter - "“You could secretly ban one party’s candidate…secretly turn down the reach of their stuff and turn up the reach of something else and the rest of us might not even find out about it until AFTER the election.”
Liberals' lack of self-awareness is so painful it's not even funny

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🤘🤘🤘 on Twitter - "Translation:we liked it better when we made the rules"

Meme - Katelyn Burns @transscribe: "I'm looking for trans people's thoughts on Author Musk's twitter takeover. My DMs are open if you prefer privacy."
Melissa Dahn @two_n_minus_one: "there are no other social media platforms that are even close to usable for trans women. whether or not this is "about" hurting us, there can be no reasonable doubt that he *will* do so with the tools available. just one more step in driving us out of public life."
When TRAs proclaim how important censorship is to them, and how fragile they are
Comment (elsewhere): "Coming from someone whose left leaning after leaving so many "leftbook" groups on Facebook this is nowhere near true. If you don't support all the made up non binary pronouns you're basically treated as Hitler. A lot of those groups are so heavily controlled that the they/them/ze/zir types have so many tightly wrapped little bubbles that they don't ever have to interact with normal people who don't believe their crap.
I still support those with genuine gender dysphoria I even have friends who are trans but so many people have grifted on to the trans movement with a bunch of fake look at me gender pronouns that it has watered down what LGBT even means.
It has put me at a bit of a crossroad politically
I think to a large degree I'm just tuning out at this point."

EU warns Elon Musk over Twitter moderation plans - "Brussels has warned Elon Musk that Twitter must comply with the EU’s new digital rules under his ownership or risk hefty fines or even a ban, setting the stage for a global regulatory battle over the future of the social media platform."

Elon Musk Releases Statement After Taking Over Twitter - "“Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated,” Musk said in a statement. “I also want to make Twitter better than ever by enhancing the product with new features, making the algorithms open source to increase trust, defeating the spam bots, and authenticating all humans. Twitter has tremendous potential – I look forward to working with the company and the community of users to unlock it.”... Musk contacted the The Babylon Bee earlier this year, before buying a large portion of the company, after the company said that they had been suspended for a satirical article that jokingly named Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary Rachel Levine “Man of the Year.” “Musk reached out to us before he polled his followers about Twitter’s commitment to free speech,” Seth Dillon, CEO of The Babylon Bee, tweeted. “He wanted to confirm that we had, in fact, been suspended. He even mused on that call that he might need to buy Twitter. Now he’s the largest shareholder and has a seat on the board.”"

ZUBY: on Twitter - "Millions of Twitter users are upset today. Not because they fear they will be banned or censored. But because they fear the people that disagree with them may not be banned or censored."

Ajit Pai on Twitter - "I’m so old I remember being told in 2017 that “unfettered access to the Internet is essential” and that we didn’t want corporations to “censor news or websites that don’t match their political agenda.”"
Why We Must Protect Net Neutrality | Robert Reich - YouTube

Meme - "Private companies can do what they want" *amazon, Twitter, Apple, Disney, reddit, Google, YouTube, Facebook*
Liberal: "OMG YES!"
"Private companies can do what they want"
*Goya, Foxconn, GM, FOX, HOBBY LOBBY, Chick-fil-a, BP, The Salvation Army, Nestle, Literally every fucking small business*
Liberal: *upset*"

Mexico President Hopes Musk 'Cleans Up' Twitter - "Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador said Tuesday that he hoped billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk would rid Twitter of corruption and censorship after buying the social media platform.  "I hope they clean it up... of the corruption that's there, manipulation with bots," Lopez Obrador told reporters.  He said he wanted to see "an end to manipulation and censorship... so that we all have the possibility of communicating."  Lopez Obrador has previously accused Twitter and other social media including Facebook of censoring content, arguing in favor of freedom of information.  In January 2021 he criticized major social media platforms for locking out then-US president Donald Trump"

Twitter’s top lawyer reassures staff, cries during meeting about Musk takeover - "top Twitter lawyer Vijaya Gadde called a virtual meeting with the policy and legal teams she oversees to discuss what the new ownership could mean for them."
Twitter's 'chief censor' making $17m per year could be fired - "The Musk tweet as well as a critical tweet by journalist Saagar Enjeti, who called Gadde Twitter’s “top censorship advocate” who “censored the Hunter Biden laptop story,” prompted pro-Musk Twitter users to criticize her."

Flashback to when Elon Musk cancelled 'rude' blogger's Tesla order
Weird. Liberals keep telling us that freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences. I guess "consequences" only apply to people they dislike. And in this case it's just a private company cancelling a transaction

Elon Musk says suspending NY Post from Twitter was 'incredibly inappropriate' - ""Suspending the Twitter account of a major news organization for publishing a truthful story was obviously incredibly inappropriate"...   The piece was banned by major social media sites in the weeks before the election, with Twitter justifying accusations of censorship by labeling the story “content obtained through hacking that contains private information.”  “The images contained in the articles include personal and private information — like email addresses and phone numbers — which violate our rules,” the company tweeted about the article at the time.  Many mainstream outlets also discredited the article, before later reporting on its veracity long after President Joe Biden was elected.   The Republican National Committee accused the site of being in cahoots with the Biden campaign, but the Federal Election Commission ruled that Twitter did not suppress the article in an effort to tip the scales to the Democrats."

Twitter executive accuses Elon Musk of MISOGYNY for criticizing firm's top lawyer - "Lara Cohen, Twitter's global head of partners, reacted with anger to Musk and his followers' attacks on singling out of the firm's top lawyer Vijaya Gadde, and chief marketing officer Leslie Berland... Yet Gadde and Berland were not the only ones in the spotlight: Musk himself also singled out Jim Baker, Twitter's lawyer, after conservative commentator Mike Cernovich called out Baker's work. 'Twitter lawyer Jim Baker, when general counsel of the FBI, personally arranged a meeting between the FBI and Michael Sussmann. In this meeting, Sussmann presented fabricated evidence in the Alfa bank matter,' Cernovich tweeted.  '@elonmusk, this is who is inside Twitter. He facilitated fraud.'  Musk then replied: 'Sounds pretty bad …'   Musk continued his criticism of the platform he is buying, noting that more people were downloading Donald Trump's rival, Truth Social, than Twitter... Twitter staff have been told their jobs are safe for the six months the transfer of ownership is expected to take.  But after that, workers like Gadde are likely to be among the first to get the boot. She was pivotal in the decision to ban Donald Trump from the platform for inciting unrest, and also played a key role in the decision to remove The New York Post's account when they tweeted their reporting into Hunter Biden's laptop... Saagar Enjeti, host of a conservative YouTube show, tweeted a link to Politico's report about Gadde's tears, commented: 'Vijaya Gadde, the top censorship advocate at Twitter who famously gaslit the world on Joe Rogan's podcast and censored the Hunter Biden laptop story, is very upset about the @elonmusk takeover.'... Star Trek actor George Takei also voiced his fears over Musk.  But he said he was not quitting Twitter, because giving a greater platform to extremists meant that moderates like him were even more important... Geraint Davies, a senior staff video engineer for Twitter, wrote: 'Anyone in need of a software engineer with 40 years of experience? Asking for a friend.'  Twitter engineer Jay Holler wrote: 'For the first time, Twitter leadership includes someone that I had proactively Blocked on this platform.'   Gerard Taylor, a senior software engineer, was conflicted: 'My current sentiment: Stock is up! YAY! But what about our company culture?'   Chloe Barnes, Twitter's lead for global curation standards, added: 'Totally understand that this is entertainment for some. But please know that this is certainly not entertainment for me.'   Cassie Nick Rumbaugh, a data scientist, bemoaned Musk's alleged transphobia and wrote: 'I'm honestly kinda terrified rn.'        Twitter founder Jack Dorsey, to the contrary, found the takeover from Musk to be exciting news.  After posting a Spotify link to the Radiohead song 'Everything in it's Right Place,' Dorsey elaborated on his thoughts.   'I love Twitter. Twitter is the closest thing we have to a global consciousness. The idea and service is all that matters to me and I will do whatever it takes to protect both.   'In principle, I don't think anyone should own or run Twitter,' he added. 'It wants to be a public good at a protocol level, not a company. Solving for the problem of it being a company however, Elon is the only solution I trust.'  He said that Musk's goal of 'creating a platform that is maximally trusted and broadly inclusive is the right one.'  'I'm so happy Twitter will continue to serve the public conversation. Around the world and to the stars!'"
Criticising a liberal woman is "misogyny"
Anyone who disagrees with a liberal is an "extremist"

Dataracer on Twitter>/a> - "Here's some of the death threats Elon Musk is getting after buying Twitter. Radical actvists are claiming its ok to send death threats now because it's "free speech."
Woke journalists are now accusing Elon Musk of targeting Twitter employees for harassment.  They show only 3 screens shots, and say Twitter employees are terrified asking for protection.  Here's >80 death threats sent to Elon Musk today by an actual violent mob.
Twitters Saftey executive Vijaya Gadde sent these 3 tweets to the journalist herself to smear Elon Musk.  They were all screen captured within 1 min of being posted, at a similar time, on 3 different posts. None by Elon Musk.  Kinda sloppy on this hit job."
Liberal logic - death threats they support are free speech, but facts they disagree with are hate speech. That is why Twitter is fine with death threats against JK Rowling but not biology that TRAs hate

PerfectStranger917 on Twitter - "I'm laughing at the people saying Elon Musk could have given $44 Billion to "help the poor and feed the hungry". Why aren't they saying that about Soros, Bezos, Buffett, and Bloomberg?"

Elon Musk gave a mysterious $5.7 billion donation weeks after he dared the UN to show him its plan for solving world hunger

Ben Shapiro on Twitter - "Elon Musk has committed to nothing except more transparency and more free speech -- and the Left is melting down. Which shows two things:
1. They hate transparency and free speech;
2. They always assumed Twitter opposed both, then gaslit everyone that Twitter wasn't biased."

Elon Musk’s Acquisition of Twitter Will Probably Suck for Women - "“Free speech” as it’s defined in the Constitution—which means the government cannot arrest you for expressing opinions it doesn’t like—actually has very little to do with Twitter, a private corporation with full authority to ban as many Nazis, public health threats, and abusive, revenge porn-posting exes as it deems fit... And because he has $44 billion in cash (which is a lot of money just to stop this image from being circulated), we all have to just watch it happen. The last person in the world I’ll be taking lectures about “free speech” from, mind you, is a man who has fired employees over inane YouTube videos and barred workers from attempts to organize at his extremely dangerous, low-paying factory."
Liberals admitting that women and "marginalized people" need the kid gloves, while pretending that they don't already bully people all the time on Twitter, and showing a massive ignorance of both history and the rest of the world by pretending that free speech is only about the First Amendment (and then doing a bait and switch)
These are the same people who go on about "white fragility"
Where's the fact check about Musk using $44 billion in cash? Considering that not even all of the money is coming from him (let alone in cash), that's outright fake news

Facebook - "Pretty hilarious series of tweets. Twitter engineer tries to defend the Biden laptop suppression by Twitter by claiming the laptop was hacked (it wasn't, even NYT admitted it wasn't), essentially publicly refuting his new boss with fake news. His account has now disappeared. Maybe an algorithm got him for sharing fake news (lol as if, fake news moderation only applies on conservatives)."
Saagar Enjeti on Twitter - "Twitter engineer @ConnorC94096361 replies to his new boss @elonmusk defending their takedown of the Hunter Biden laptop"

Bokhari: 6 Steps for Elon Musk to Restore Free Speech on Twitter - "It conjures memories of Donald Trump winning the Presidency in 2016, only to find himself saddled with a bureaucracy determined to undermine his agenda at every turn...
1. Personnel is Policy...
Before Musk can do anything, he must solve the personnel problem. The threat of internal sabotage from frothing-at-the-mouth progressive employees is so dire that Twitter locked down its source code within hours of announcing its deal with Musk, presumably to prevent malicious tampering. Musk simply cannot expect any part of his vision for Twitter to be enacted until he answers the personnel question.  The first and most important department for Musk to overhaul will be the office of Internal Audit. The Internal Audit department will be the eyes and ears of Musk inside Twitter... It took Trump three years before he found a good “internal auditor” to smoke out saboteurs in the federal government — Musk, confronted with his own Deep State, might want to get some tips from Johnny McEntee’s team. The next most important position is that of the Chief Information Security Officer (CISO). All internal security measures at Twitter, from catching foreign spies to catching woke saboteurs, are the CISO’s responsibility. Of course, the CISO is just one person — it is more than likely that the entire internal security team will need to be replaced, and replaced with loyalists.  Other people that Musk will have to keep a close eye on, or replace, will be those in charge of the Site Reliability Engineers — the people with high-level access to Twitter’s systems, who both keep the site running smoothly, and have enough access to be effective saboteurs.  And, of course, the content moderation operation will need to be overhauled, stat.
2. Become Antifragile...
Even if you mandate free speech on your platform, powers beyond your control can still censor you. Twitter is no different. It relies on access to the Apple App store, the Google Play Store, and Amazon Web Services, the cloud hosting provider that effectively banned Parler from the internet last year, and which currently has the power to do so to Twitter as well. There are viable alternatives that are not owned by Elon-hater Jeff Bezos, such as Microsoft Azure and the Google Cloud, but they will also demand content moderation. Word on the street is that IBM’s cloud service is desperate for business, but that too will face pressure to cut service to any genuine free speech platform. Luckily, Tesla is dabbling in its own cloud infrastructure... As a temporary solution to the problem of App Store censorship, Musk’s Twitter could learn a trick from conservative-run competitor Parler, which separated content moderation on its browser version from content moderation on its iOS App in its successful bid to return to the App Store. Content that would have resulted in an App Store ban was blocked on the iOS app, but users could still view it through browsers... Ultimately, a permanent solution to the problem of App Store censorship will require the owners of third-party apps, like Musk, to band together and demand regulations that prevent Apple and Google from blacklisting apps on a whim.  There is a bill going through Congress, the Open App Markets Act, which would strengthen the hand of app creators, but still contains massive loopholes allowing censorship. Musk could be a powerful force on the side of app creators against app stores. Unless Musk decides to launch a Tesla Phone to compete with Apple and Google, only regulation will break the app store chokehold.   The ultimate goal of these efforts should be to make Twitter antifragile. Whenever it is targeted by a hostile web host, app store, or payment processor, it should have the ability to quickly bounce back through alternative (perhaps Tesla-owned) providers or court injunctions backed by new anti-blacklisting laws... When highly publicized external attacks prove ineffective, it strengthens the reputation of a platform as a safe harbor for rebels — an antifragile digital fortress.
3. Conquer D.C...
The ink was scarcely dry on Twitter’s press release when the White House warned the platform not to host “misinformation” (meaning information outside their preferred narratives). In order to secure anti-deplatforming laws that protect Twitter from hostile app stores and other third parties, he will also need to go on the offensive, backing legislation that will shield the platform from external foes. Like never before, Musk will need resourceful allies in Washington.  Another key hire for Musk will be an employment lawyer (or ten) for Twitter. California law allows businesses to fire their employees at will, but there are still plenty of grounds for unlawful termination lawsuits...
4. Unravel the Algorithms
Censorship is more than just bans. It is an intricate system built up by deranged social justice warrior coders over the course of more than five years. It is shrouded in vague terminology like “coordinated inauthentic behavior,” or deceptive enforcement actions like classifying conservative accounts as “bots.” That’s before we even get to the more obvious pretexts for politically motivated banning, like “hate speech” and “disinformation.”...
5. Embrace Self-Sovereign Identity...
On the outer edge of innovation, a new technology has developed that would allow platforms to “authenticate real humans” while also protecting privacy and anonymity: it’s called Self Sovereign Identity. It works by separating the business of identity verification from centralized actors. Instead of verifying your identity to Google, or to Facebook, or to Twitter, you verify your identity to a third party whose sole purpose is providing secure, privacy-protecting verification. Once this is done, you are given a digital passport proving you are a human (but not necessarily revealing any other personal data) that can be used by platforms like Twitter to ensure new users are not bots. If Musk embraces this technology, he can kill multiple birds with a single stone: he will solve the problem of authenticating humans, while making Twitter more privacy-friendly than any of its competitors, while at the same time mainstreaming a technology that has enormous potential: for platforms, for users, and for the future of secure online conversations.
6. The Great Unbanning
The most obvious point is saved for last, yet unbanning people, like every other step on the road to restoring free speech on Twitter, will be no straightforward task. While the more prominent victims of Twitter censorship, like Donald Trump, will be easy to identify, there are thousands upon thousands of smaller accounts that have been banned for bogus reasons and will also need to be restored. As I explained in my book on tech censorship, DELETED, leftist-run platforms like Twitter spent the last half-decade developing tools to target not just individual users, but entire networks of users. How will those users be identified? Will there be a general amnesty? If there is a general amnesty, how will the flood of unbanned spambots, phishers, sharers of illegal material, and other genuinely unwelcome accounts be dealt with?"

Shaun King on Twitter - "I am told this morning that Apple and Google will remove Twitter from the App Store if it does not moderate and remove hate speech under @ElonMusk. This isn’t a new policy, but a commitment already made. Amazon Web Services has the same commitment. So there’s that."
Darren J. Beattie 🌐 on Twitter - "The American Regime and free-speech are incompatible"

Meme - Temi @temi_suyi: "We'll soon start logging on to twitter dot com and elon musk bros will be calling us dirty monkey niggers but we cannot report the tweet because of free speech."
Meme - Temi @temi_suyi: "White people are a pandemic"
Anti-racists are the biggest racists

Defending Speech We Hate | News & Commentary | American Civil Liberties Union - "The record demonstrates the ACLU’s unwavering commitment to First Amendment rights for all."
Reuters on Twitter - "Human rights groups including the ACLU and Amnesty International raised concerns about hate speech on Twitter and the power that Elon Musk, a self-described 'free speech absolutist,' would have after his acquisition"
Ironically, especially given the recent civil war in the ACLU over defending Nazis

Meme - (silll888.tez) @silll888: "Musk spent $44 Billion on Twitter. The World's population is & billion. He could have given each person $5 billion and still have money leftover. I feel like a cheque for $5 billion would be life changing for most people. Yet he wasted it all on Twitter."

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter - "Tired of having to collectively stress about what explosion of hate crimes is happening bc some billionaire with an ego problem unilaterally controls a massive communication platform and skews it because Tucker Carlson or Peter Thiel took him to dinner and made him feel special"
Facebook - "LMAO! Sexually frustrated Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez only hates Elon Musk because she wants to date him. Hey Weirdo, stop projecting your sexual frustrations on him, perverted degenerate."
Comment (elsewhere): "She is projecting more than one thing. Elon wants to make the algorithm public and transparent while the left was the one keeping twitter opaque and whimsical. Until and unless there is evidence new twitter actively suppresses the left like the right has been pre Elon then this is 100% bull like most of the nonsense she says."

Meme - Jeremy Prime @DDayCobra: "NPCs got their update!"
Cheri Jacobus @CheriJacobus: "Elon Musk is rapidly becoming a bigger danger than Trump."

Elon Musk and the Tech Bro Obsession With 'Free Speech' - "“It does seem to be a dominant obsession with the most elite, the most driven Elon Musks of the world,” says Fred Turner, professor of communication at Stanford University and author of several books about Silicon Valley culture, who argues that “free speech seems to be much more of an obsession among men.”"
Apparently it's a good thing that women don't care about free speech. Civil rights and a healthy democracy are only good when they benefit liberals

Facebook - "The "I can't pay off my $120,000 in student loans from my anger studies degree" crowd thinks it can spend $44 billion better than Elon Musk can. My children, you can't even spend an hour of your own time well."

Geoff Russ: The world isn't ending because Elon Musk is buying Twitter - "Musk’s South African heritage was enough for another activist, Tim Wise, to proclaim in a (promptly deleted) tweet that, “We’re gonna have to deal with Nazis the way our grandparents did, because Elon Musk is gonna let them say what they want in the name of free speech.” People under 30 who are seeking to help fund their retirement should bet against the possibility that Musk’s Twitter purchase will result in the need to re-liberate Europe... The world will keep on turning, regardless of whether Twitter is owned by Elon Musk, or members of the Saudi royal family, who are among the platform’s biggest shareholders. Many progressives clearly preferred that their favourite social media platform be owned by some of the world’s leading human rights abusers, rather than a self-professed “free-speech absolutist” like Musk.  Even though most people who are currently threatening to leave Twitter will return sooner, rather than later, their unhinged ravings after the change in ownership was announced is proof enough that they could use a break from social media. Normal people should be content with the fact that life will go on, and ignore the dire warnings littering everybody’s social media feeds."

‘Anti-racism educator’ says we’re ‘gonna have to deal with Nazis the way our grandparents did’ because of Elon Musk
Apparently the Nazis were for free speech

Meme - Tim Wise @timjacobwise: "Fuck Elon Musk. Apartheid Baby. You, your company, and everyone who Stans for you. I'm saying this on your platform now and will keep saying it. Let's see how committed you are to free speech when we start roasting your ass...
We're gonna have to deal with Nazis the way our grandparents did because Elon Musk is gonna let them say whatever they want in the name of free speech. Cool, there are other options..."

Research: Conservatives Gained 17K Twitter Followers on Average After Musk Takeover, Leftists Lost 6K - "According to research that looked at 100 prominent conservatives and leftists, conservatives gained an average of 17,229 followers after Musk’s takeover, while leftists lost an average of 6,062 followers... prominent conservative accounts have increased their follower count by approximately ten times the average daily rate for the month leading up to the acquisition.   In comparison, popular left-leaning accounts collectively lost hundreds of thousands of followers on April 25 and 26. The Verge alleges that the move is most likely an organic reaction to the news of Musk’s takeover rather than a change in the platform...   Twitter told NBC News that the fluctuation in follower count was “a result of an increase in new account creation and deactiviation,” which would represent a shift of hundreds of thousands of users over a single day."

The Babylon Bee made a hilarious video about Twitter employees being too sensitive and Twitter's censors flagged the video as... well, you know

Clint Ehrlich on Twitter - "A blue-check reporter, who has worked for the NYT and the Guardian, posted an entire thread supporting the Karachi suicide bomber. This is how Twitter works today: Conservatives can't get verified, but "journalists" can openly advocate terrorism."

What Happens When Doctors Can't Tell the Truth?

What Happens When Doctors Can't Tell the Truth?

"They meet once a month on Zoom: a dozen doctors from around the country with distinguished careers in different specialities. They vary in ethnicity, age and sexual orientation. Some work for the best hospitals in the U.S. or teach at top medical schools. Others are dedicated to serving the most vulnerable populations in their communities. 

The meetings are largely a support group. The members share their concerns about what’s going on in their hospitals and universities, and strategize about what to do. What is happening, they say, is the rapid spread of a deeply illiberal ideology in the country’s most important medical institutions. 

This dogma goes by many imperfect names — wokeness, social justice, critical race theory, anti-racism — but whatever it’s called, the doctors say this ideology is stifling critical thinking and dissent in the name of progress. They say that it’s turning students against their teachers and patients and racializing even the smallest interpersonal interactions. Most concerning, they insist that it is threatening the foundations of patient care, of research, and of medicine itself.

These aren’t secret bigots who long for the “good old days” that were bad for so many. They are largely politically progressive, and they are the first to say that there are inequities in medicine that must be addressed. Sometimes it’s overt racism from colleagues or patients, but more often the problem is deeper, baked into the very systems clinicians use to determine treatment...

I’ve heard from doctors who’ve been reported to their departments for criticizing residents for being late. (It was seen by their trainees as an act of racism.) I’ve heard from doctors who’ve stopped giving trainees honest feedback for fear of retaliation. I’ve spoken to those who have seen clinicians and residents refuse to treat patients based on their race or their perceived conservative politics.

Some of these doctors say that there is a “purge” underway in the world of American medicine: question the current orthodoxy and you will be pushed out. They are so worried about the dangers of speaking out about their concerns that they will not let me identify them except by the region of the country where they work.

“People are afraid to speak honestly,” said a doctor who immigrated to the U.S. from the Soviet Union. “It’s like back to the USSR, where you could only speak to the ones you trust.” If the authorities found out, you could lose your job, your status, you could go to jail or worse. The fear here is not dissimilar. 

When doctors do speak out, shared another, “the reaction is savage. And you better be tenured and you better have very thick skin.”

“We’re afraid of what's happening to other people happening to us,” a doctor on the West Coast told me. “We are seeing people being fired. We are seeing people's reputations being sullied. There are members of our group who say, ‘I will be asked to leave a board. I will endanger the work of the nonprofit that I lead if this comes out.’ People are at risk of being totally marginalized and having to leave their institutions.”

While the hyper focus on identity is seen by many proponents of social justice ideology as a necessary corrective to America’s past sins, some people working in medicine are deeply concerned by what “justice” and “equity” actually look like in practice.

“The intellectual foundation for this movement is the Marxist view of the world, but stripped of economics and replaced with race determinism,” one psychologist explained. “Because you have a huge group of people, mostly people of color, who have been underserved, it was inevitable that this model was going to be applied to the world of medicine. And it has been.” 

“Wokeness feels like an existential threat,” a doctor from the Northwest said. “In health care, innovation depends on open, objective inquiry into complex problems, but that’s now undermined by this simplistic and racialized worldview where racism is seen as the cause of all disparities, despite robust data showing it’s not that simple.”

“Whole research areas are off-limits,” he said, adding that some of what is being published in the nation’s top journals is “shoddy as hell.” 

Here, he was referring in part to a study published last year in the Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences. The study was covered all over the news, with headlines like “Black Newborns More Likely to Die When Looked After by White Doctors” (CNN), “The Lack of Black Doctors is Killing Black Babies” (Fortune), and “Black Babies More Likely to Survive when Cared for by Black Doctors” (The Guardian).

Despite these breathless headlines, the study was so methodologically flawed that, according to several of the doctors I spoke with, it’s impossible to extrapolate any conclusions about how the race of the treating doctor impacts patient outcomes at all. And yet very few people were willing to publicly criticize it. As Vinay Prasad, a clinician and a professor at the University of California San Francisco, put it on Twitter: “I am aware of dozens of people who agree with my assessment of this paper and are scared to comment.”

“It’s some of the most shoddy, methodologically flawed research we’ve ever seen published in these journals,” the doctor in the Zoom meeting said, “with sensational conclusions that seem totally unjustified from the results of the study.”

“It’s frustrating because we all know how hard it is to get good, sound research published,” he added. “So do those rules and quality standards no longer apply to this topic, or to these authors, or for a certain time period?”

At the same time that the bar appears to be lower for articles and studies that push an anti-racist agenda, the consequences for questioning or criticizing that agenda can be high. 

Just ask Norman Wang. Last year, the University of Pittsburgh cardiologist was demoted by his department after he published a paper in the Journal of the American Heart Association (JAHA) analyzing and criticizing diversity initiatives in cardiology. Looking at 50 years of data, Wang argued that affirmative action and other diversity initiatives have failed to both meaningfully increase the percentage of black and Hispanic clinicians in his field or to improve patient outcomes. Rather than admitting, hiring and promoting clinicians based on their race, he argued for race-neutral policies in medicine. 

“Long-term academic solutions and excellence should not be sacrificed for short-term demographic optics,” Wang wrote. “Ultimately, all who aspire to a profession in medicine and cardiology must be assessed as individuals on the basis of their personal merits, not their racial and ethnic identities.”

At first, there was little response. But four months after it was published, screenshots of the paper began circulating on Twitter and others in the field began accusing Wang of racism. Sharonne Hayes, a cardiologist at the Mayo Clinic, implored colleagues to “rise up.” “The fact that this is published in ‘our’ journal should both enrage & activate all of us,” she wrote, adding the hashtag #RetractRacists.

Soon after, Barry London, the editor in chief of JAHA, issued an apology and the journal retracted the work over Wang’s objection. London cited no specific errors in Wang’s paper in his statement, just that publishing it was antithetical to his and the journal’s values. Retraction, in a case like this, is exceedingly rare: When papers are retracted, it’s generally because of the data or the study has been discredited. A search of the journal’s website and the Retraction Database found records of just two retractions in JAHA: Wang’s paper and a 2019 paper that erroneously linked heart attacks to vaping.

After the outcry, the American Heart Association (AHA), which publishes the journal, issued a statement denouncing Wang’s paper and promising an investigation. In a tweet, the organization said it “does NOT represent AHA values. JAHA is editorially independent but that’s no excuse. We’ll investigate. We’ll do better. We’re invested in helping to build a diverse health care and research community.” 

As the criticism mounted, Wang was removed from his position as the director of a fellowship program in clinical cardiac electrophysiology at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and was prohibited from making any contact with students. His boss reportedly told him that his classroom was “inherently unsafe” due to the views he expressed.

Wang is now suing both the AHA and the University of Pittsburgh for defamation and violating his First Amendment rights. To the doctors on the Zoom call, his case was a stark warning of what can happen when one questions policies like affirmative action, which, according to recent polling, is opposed by nearly two-thirds of Americans, including majorities of blacks, Hispanics, and Asians.

“I’m into efforts to make medicine more diverse,” a doctor from the Zoom group said. “But what’s gone off the rails here is that there is an intolerance of people that have another point of view. And that's going to hurt us all.”

JAHA isn’t the only journal issuing apologies. In February, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) released a podcast hosted by surgeon and then-deputy journal editor Edward Livingston, who questioned the value of the hyper focus on race in medicine as well as the idea that medicine is systemically racist...

A number of researchers vowed to boycott the journal, and a petition condemning JAMA has received over 9,000 signatures. In response to the backlash, JAMA quickly deleted the episode, promised to investigate, and asked Livingston to resign from his job. He did.

If you try to access the podcast today, you find an apology in its place from JAMA editor-in-chief Howard Bauchner, who called Livingston’s statements, “inaccurate, offensive, hurtful and inconsistent with the standards of JAMA.” Bauchner was also suspended by JAMA pending an independent investigation. This Tuesday, JAMA announced that Bauchner officially stepped down. In a statement, he said he is “profoundly disappointed in myself for the lapses that led to the publishing of the tweet and podcast. Although I did not write or even see the tweet, or create the podcast, as editor in chief, I am ultimately responsible for them.” 

Shortly after this announcement, the New York Times reported that “JAMA’s reckoning” led to a backlash from some JAMA members, who wrote in a letter to the organization that “there is a general feeling that the firing of the editors involved in the podcast was perhaps precipitous, possibly a blot on free speech and also possibly an example of reverse discrimination.” Bauchner’s last day at JAMA is June 30...

“Some attending physicians are hesitant to provide constructive criticism to trainees over fears of being perceived as racist,” a doctor in the Northeast said. “You ask yourself, ‘Is this worth bringing up?’ You second guess yourself.”

The doctor said this ideology has impacted how some trainees and physicians respond when they encounter bias from patients, which is hardly uncommon for people working in health care. Female doctors are mistaken for nurses. Black doctors are mistaken for aides. Patients refuse care from doctors who aren’t white. 

A Jewish doctor in the Northeast told me about encountering antisemitism at work. 

“Years ago, I had a guy slowly roll up his sleeve and put his arm down on the table in front of me and he had a big swastika tattoo. And he says my name and repeats it slowly three times. Clearly he is saying he knows I’m Jewish. And I looked at his arm and said, ‘Does it hurt to get a tattoo? I never learned much about that.’ He actually chuckled.”

The doctor kept seeing the patient, who gradually stopped doing drugs, got a job, and pieced his life together. “Twelve years later,” he said, “I was leaving that program and on our last visit, he had a terrible rash on his arm. I said we had to treat that rash, and this big, tough guy started crying. He said, ‘I knew I was going to see you. I was trying to rub it off.’ How about that? People are changeable, but it takes time and it can’t be done by scolding.” 

This was what he was taught in his training years ago: You meet patients where they are, help them as much as you can, and hope they are better off for the encounter. 

That philosophy, however, is changing. Increasingly, the doctors told me, this next generation of trainees seem to believe it’s also their duty to confront patients about their own prejudice — whether they’re open to it or not...

Should clinicians police their patients’ language to protect the feelings of their health-care providers?...

As major medical institutions formalize their commitments to social justice ideology, the sentiment that medical professionals need to put aside their feelings in service of treating patients seems increasingly old-fashioned. Some institutions, including Harvard Medical School, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Medical Association (AMA), the largest association of physicians and medical students in the U.S., have released statements acknowledging their own history of racism, a trend one of the doctors described as “confessional.”

In an 83-page report released in May, the AMA pledged address its “white supremacist” past, which includes horrific 19th-century practices like performing surgeries on enslaved people without anesthesia as well as the organization’s endorsement of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. But it’s not just ancient history the organization is concerned about: the report also mentions the JAMA podcast that cost Edward Livingston and Howard Bauchner their jobs, referring to the podcast as an “egregious, harmful error.” 

The report recommendations rely heavily on diversity training, but as one of the doctors on the Zoom call said, “more diversity trainings are not going to change anything, but they are going to waste time we already don’t have to spare.”

There are, of course, an array of diversity trainings, including some that simply lay out anti-discrimination laws and others that require white people to confess their privilege. Trainings that may have seemed obviously racist just a few years ago — like separating employees into “affinity groups” or “caucuses” based on race — are now commonplace, including at large corporations, small non-profits, and medical institutions. (My wife, a nurse in Seattle, recently joined the “white caucus” at her hospital, and noted that she felt very strange asking to join a whites-only group.) 

The diversity industry is now worth billions of dollars, but there have been surprisingly few evaluations of whether or not such trainings actually work. The research that has been done is not encouraging. One study found that these trainings can be counterproductive; another found that positive effects don’t seem to last

What’s more, the doctors said, statements like the AMA’s seem destined to create backlash. “You have to wonder about the unintended consequences of these organizations falling over themselves to declare that they're structurally and systemically racist,” one of the doctors said. “Clearly, they think they’re going to get virtue-signaling points. But is it possible these claims are also playing into vaccine hesitancy among people of color? I mean, would you want to get vaccinated at an institution that’s enthusiastically broadcasting to the world, ‘We’re racist!’ I wouldn’t.”

There’s clearly a generation gap between these doctors on Zoom, the youngest of whom has been practicing for at least 10 years, and doctors just beginning their career. The older clinicians are more likely to appear politically neutral, at least at work, while younger students and clinicians are more likely to prioritize activism. Those differences can be a major source of tension. 

One prominent organization, White Coats for Black Lives, was formed by medical students in 2014 and now has at least 75 chapters all over the U.S. In addition to publishing a Racial Justice Report Card that grades medical schools, the group encourages medical students to make specific demands of their institutions, including that medical schools and hospitals end all relationships with local law enforcement. 

When asked what severing ties with police would do in his urban emergency room, one ER doctor said it would be a “total disaster.” Police, he told me, are a vital part of emergency operations, from securing crime scenes so emergency responders can see victims to helping transport patients to keeping hospital staff and patients safe when private security is inadequate. 

“I was in a situation once where an ambulance brought in a gunshot victim,” he said. “We brought the patient in, and about 15 minutes later, a group came looking for him. They came to finish him. They were going from room to room, looking for him, and when a couple of guys from hospital security tried to get them to leave, one shot a gun in the air. Luckily enough, we heard police sirens bringing someone else in, and when they heard the sirens, they ran. If not for the police, I don’t know what would have happened.”

As another example of the generation gap, an ER doctor on the West Coast said he sees providers, particularly younger ones, applying antiracist principles in choosing how they allocate their time and which patients they choose to work with.  “I've heard examples of Covid-19 cases in the emergency department where providers go, ‘I’m not going to go treat that white guy, I'm going to treat the person of color instead because whatever happened to the white guy, he probably deserves it.’”

Some in medicine would like to see such race-conscious bias mandated on an institutional level...

In April, Vermont’s Republican Governor Phill Scott announced that any resident over age 16 who identified as a black, indigenous, or a person of color would be eligible for the vaccine before white people, a decision that, according to some legal scholars, likely violated federal law...

The Boston Review published an editorial by physicians Bram Wispelwey and Michelle Morse entitled “An Antiracist Agenda for Medicine.” In it, the doctors argue that in order to address discrepancies in health-care access and outcomes, hospitals should commit to “preferentially admitting patients historically denied access to certain forms of medical care.” That is, they should admit people to health services based on their skin color...

Dr. Morse and her co-author write that because a study they conducted found that white heart failure patients are more likely to be referred to cardiology specialists than some minority groups, in their own practice they have developed “a preferential admission option for Black and Latinx heart failure patients to our specialty cardiology service.” So when these patients seek care, they are now far more likely to be referred to specialists and admitted to an inpatient service, regardless of whether that’s the most appropriate strategy for their condition, or their primary care providers’ recommendations, or their own personal preferences. 

What the authors don’t mention is that while their own study does show that white heart failure patients are more likely to be referred to specialists, this alone doesn’t demonstrate they’re more likely to have better outcomes: More whites in that very study died soon after discharge. This, according to one physician, is exactly what’s wrong with race-conscious policies.

“We have been working for almost a decade now to keep people from getting unnecessary care and unnecessary hospitalization because there are all these unintended consequences,” he said. “You can get infected with an antibiotic-resistant bug; you can get the wrong medication; errors happen. We’re trying to keep people out of the hospital if they don't need to be there. So when you enact a policy like the one proposed by Michelle Morse, you’re just opening that person up to all these potentially negative consequences.” 

In other words, in an effort to address racial disparities, it’s possible the very patients they are attempting to help will suffer more, not less...

“What happens with symbolic crusades is they overreach and you get a tremendous backlash,” he continued. “If hospitals actually adopt a policy of what can be construed as favoring black people in the ICU, can you imagine what conservative media would do with that? It would play into every fear that what this is really about is suppressing liberty, chilling free speech. I didn’t used to think those fears were legitimate. Now I do. I get it.”"

 

Of course, it's racist to refuse to treat "minorities", but it's anti-racist to refuse to treat white people.

Links - 16th May 2022 (1 - Ukraine War)

U2's Bono and the Edge perform in Kyiv subway station
Entertaining Allied Troops in World War II - " Keeping the morale of those both at home and abroad undoubtedly went a great way to helping the war effort. Entertainment, especially travelling groups that would operate dangerously close to the front lines, brought a slice of normality and home life to those abroad. In this article, we’ll be looking some of the Allied entertainment troops that were brought to troops across the world."
Conspiracy theorists claim that the U2 concert proves that the Ukraine War is fake. Turns out so was World War II

Meme - Dee fringe minority @Deeval33: "Why is no one standing for the people of Shanghai like they are standing for Ukraine?"
Chadwick @madwick 411: "Because the TV hasn't told them to."

Meme - "Set my tinder to Kiev Ukraine. I'm letting these girls know they can stay at my house if they can get refugee status and a plane ticket. Over 100 takers so far (i'm a solid 6). This is your chance bros"
*4 women saying hi*

Clint Ehrlich on Twitter: - "When Trump killed Soleimani, the press acted like WW3 was imminent. When Biden kills Russian generals, they act like nothing could go wrong."

Russian troops steal from Ukrainian John Deere dealer, end up hauling $5 million of equipment 700 miles to find out it's been remotely locked out 😂 - "One man has been helping track troop movement by using Apple's "Find My Device" feature on a pair of looted Airpods. In addition to the tech loot, Russian troops have been taking vast amounts of a low-tech commodity: grain. Together, Russia and Ukraine make up 25% of the world's exports of grains, and Russia is the world's second largest exporter of fertilizer. When you factor in that China, the world's largest exporter, is banning the export of fertilizer, NATO's sanctions due to Russia's war have suddenly left a good portion of the world hungry, and the rest is paying higher and higher prices for food."

A Chinese vlogger shared videos of war-torn Ukraine. He's been labeled a national traitor - "Wang Jixian didn't set out to become the Chinese voice of resistance in Ukraine. The 36-year-old resident of Odesa, a key target in Russia's invasion of the country, simply wanted to show his parents he was fine... When he logged onto Douyin, he said he would see Chinese videos praising Russian troops or supporting the invasion. "I was very angry, then I thought I would record videos for them, and I'll tell them what the real battlefield is"... His daily videos, posted across various platforms including YouTube and the Chinese messaging app WeChat, quickly gained traction as a rare voice offering Chinese audiences a glimpse into war-torn Ukraine -- a stark contrast from Chinese state media, which has promoted Russian disinformation such as unfounded claims Ukrainian soldiers are using "Nazi" tactics... "You don't need this Chinese passport anymore, you have already forgotten which country you are from," one popular comment on Douyin read. "The official position of the country should be the position of all Chinese people."... The comments of anonymous online strangers don't bother him -- but they do when it's from people he cares about, such as a Chinese Embassy staff member he knew from his previous residence in North Macedonia. He said the staffer reached out to him recently, insinuating Wang was being paid to post his videos, and asking: "Who sent you?" When Wang insisted he wasn't doing it for money, the staffer replied: "Your current behavior is not in line with national interests. I want to cut off relations with you, let's block each other."... Chinese censors have also cracked down on his videos online, he said. While all his videos have stayed up on YouTube, which is blocked in China except for those with VPNs, only about 80% of his videos have been left on WeChat, and fewer than 20% on Douyin. He doesn't know what rules he has broken. He got so frustrated that in one video on March 7, he stuck black tape in an X over his mouth, silently gesturing to the camera to convey that he was safe and still in Odesa. After speaking with CNN, his Chinese social media accounts were banned, leaving him unable to contact his family back home. He has received "countless" messages from contacts, placing pressure on him to stop posting, he said. But he has no intention of doing so."

Preparing for Defeat - "There is no diplomatic solution to the war possible prior to this happening. There is no conceivable compromise that would be acceptable to both Russia and Ukraine given the losses they have taken at this point.
The United Nations Security Council has proven once again to be useless. The only helpful thing was the General Assembly vote, which helps to identify the world’s bad or prevaricating actors.
The Biden administration’s decisions not to declare a no-fly zone or help transfer Polish MiGs were both good ones; they've kept their heads during a very emotional time. It is much better to have the Ukrainians defeat the Russians on their own, depriving Moscow of the excuse that NATO attacked them, as well as avoiding all the obvious escalatory possibilities. The Polish MiGs in particular would not add much to Ukrainian capabilities. Much more important is a continuing supply of Javelins, Stingers, TB2s, medical supplies, comms equipment, and intel sharing. I assume that Ukrainian forces are already being vectored by NATO intelligence operating from outside Ukraine.
The cost that Ukraine is paying is enormous, of course. But the greatest damage is being done by rockets and artillery, which neither MiGs nor a no-fly zone can do much about. The only thing that will stop the slaughter is defeat of the Russian army on the ground.
Putin will not survive the defeat of his army. He gets support because he is perceived to be a strongman; what does he have to offer once he demonstrates incompetence and is stripped of his coercive power?...
The war to this point has been a good lesson for China. Like Russia, China has built up seemingly high-tech military forces in the past decade, but they have no combat experience. The miserable performance of the Russian air force would likely be replicated by the People’s Liberation Army Air Force, which similarly has no experience managing complex air operations. We may hope that the Chinese leadership will not delude itself as to its own capabilities the way the Russians did when contemplating a future move against Taiwan."

Germany’s ban on the ‘Z’ symbol won’t help Ukraine - "We often hear that the war in Ukraine has transformed Germany – that we’re living through a historic change in German politics, sparked by Russia’s brutal invasion of Ukraine. Sadly, very little has changed when it comes to free speech. The German authorities are still keen to censor views they disapprove of... a spokesperson for the German interior ministry announced that anyone displaying the symbol would be liable for prosecution, and could potentially face up to three years in prison or a substantial fine. This announcement followed the decision of three German states – Lower Saxony, Bavaria and Berlin – to move to ban the symbol... pro-Russia demonstrators can now accuse Germany of hypocrisy. After all, the very same German politicians who frequently attack the repression of dissent in Russia are now repressing dissent in Germany... Maybe the ban is born of politicians’ insecurity. After all, many German politicians stand accused of having cultivated too close a relationship with Putin... Such censoriousness is not confined to the ‘Z’, either. Russian conductor Valery Gergiev recently lost his job with the Munich Philharmonic for failing to publicly distance himself from Putin or Russia. All this sets a dangerous precedent. If one minority opinion can be banned, then all other minority opinions can potentially be banned, too. We cannot build solidarity with Ukraine on the basis of censorship and illiberalism."

Are only White people 'civilized'? - The Washington Post - "To understand the selective empathy toward Ukraine, here are four historical examples that illustrate how race has always mattered when it comes to NATO and the concept of Western civilization"
Amazing projection. Taking isolated quotes (all from Americans - as if NATO were only the US) and trying to construct a huge case around them. Ironically the author undermines his point by noting that Slavs were not considered Anglo-Saxon

Cheap Chinese tyres bought by corrupt officials to blame for Russia's stalled advance - "China's version of the tire is the Yellow Sea YS20, of significantly poorer quality, according to self-described 'tyre expert' and University of Chicargo academic Karl Muth. A set of 50 Michelin XZL tyres retails on Alibaba at approximately $36,000, whereas 50 sets of the Chinese equivalent retails at around $208. Poor vehicle maintenance could also partially explain the stalling. Leaving tyres in direct sunlight for months on end often causes them to rip, adding to the amount of abandoned vehicles Ukrainians have encountered in various parts of the country during the war... The Russin army will be unable to fight another war for years because of catastrophic kit losses in Ukraine, defence experts have also said. Military analyst Henry Boyd from the International Institute for Strategic Studies said Putin could still draw on sizeable, Soviet-era reserve forces stationed across Russia. But most Russian soldiers could be unable to use it, he added, owing to insufficient training planning for troops having to rely on outdated equipment. Russia's land army consisted of 280,000 full-time active soldiers compared with Ukraine's 125,600. But the amount of Russian soldiers needed to seize the whole country and control the entire population would be close to one million, putting Russia's chances of occupying the entire country out of reach."

Inside Ukraine’s army of misfits, veterans, and tourists fighting Russia - "Recruits for the Ukrainian Foreign Legion are invited to apply via the Ukrainian embassy in their country of residence. After a cursory initial interview, they are told to head for Ukraine via Warsaw and overland to Lviv in western Ukraine. The route is so well known that it is heavily monitored by the Russians, according to a Ukrainian special forces officer I spoke with. He was worried that they would soon begin targeting recruits before they reached their destination. After Lviv, the recruits are sent to a camp near the Polish border for selection and training. Selection apparently follows no discernable process other than separating those that don’t have military experience from those that do. The former are put through a 4-week training course — the latter are given a weapon and sent to the front in ad-hoc units with a Ukrainian officer. Some candidates are inexplicably rejected while others – regarded as being eminently unsuitable by their peers, are retained. In any case, the process has some fatal flaws – no one becomes a competent soldier in just 4 weeks, and even experienced soldiers require assimilation training. Every war has its own dynamics which can be equally lethal to veterans and beginners if not properly understood. In their first trial by fire earlier this month, the volunteers were put into a hasty defense north of Kyiv, as the Russians began their onslaught on the towns lying north of the city. After the initial volley of Ukrainian anti-tank missiles had stopped the attackers in their tracks, enemy soldiers spilled out of their armored fighting vehicles about a quarter-mile in front of the volunteers, and into a withering storm of fire that halted the assault. “Shoot the ones in black uniforms,” a Ukrainian platoon commander is said to have told his foreign charges. “They are Belarusians.” Ukrainians are particularly incensed (but not surprised) at the perfidious complicity of Belarusian autocrat Alexander Lukashenko in taking his stance as a sycophantic second to President Vladimir Putin. Sadly, as with Putin, it is Lukashenko’s soldiers who are paying the price. Although the Legionnaires helped to halt the attack, their performance that day was uneven — an observation that led the Ukrainians to discharge the surviving members of the initial intake, without any ceremony or official notification. Worse was to come. An unknown number of new recruits were training at a camp near the border when, a strike by Tupolev bombers, carrying Kh 101 cruise missiles, destroyed the camp. The death toll is not yet clear, but Ukrainian officers have told me that it will likely be more than 100. With most of its initial intake now discharged, and many from subsequent intakes killed or wounded, the plan to stand up the Ukrainian Foreign Legion program is one part of the Ukrainian war effort that is definitely not going well. “We should only take experienced combat veterans — that is the lesson that we are learning,” a Ukrainian general told Task & Purpose on condition of anonymity. “The others don’t know what they are getting themselves into – and when they find out, they want to go home. We need specialized skills – especially snipers.”"

[OC] from Russia with love : Funnymemes - "Hello Americans! Uh.. This is Natasha from Russia and we want to thank you for all your sanctions. For taking away from our country Coca-Cola, KFC, MacDonald's, and all that shit. We understand that you take care of our health sysn.. health sisness.. health-health.. health sysness? Ok? Danka. Healthsy! And ah.. that's why we'll will be stronger and more beautiful and wissout fyat. So! We take care of you too! And that's why we cut our gyas! So, you have to walk buy food, instead of using your cars. Don't thank you! Don't.. Don't say thank you! Um.. Friendship! I am so sorry, I have to go to feed my bear and drink vodka and play balalika right now. Uh.. See you later! From Russia with love "

The Moscow Times - Posts | Facebook - "Speaking at a sermon at the Kremlin’s Archangel Cathedral Tuesday, the head of the Russian Orthodox Church told worshippers that Russia had "never attacked anyone.”"
Sounds like China logic. Define the whole world as yours - so you're never attacking others

Facebook - "Patriarch Kirill said that Russia had never attacked anyone.
+++
So in 1472, the Moscow principality "did not attack" Novgorod, conquered it. And as the historical chronicles write, "blood flowed instead of water in the river."
1495, the Moscow principality "did not attack" Sweden on the territory of Finland,
in 1487 the Moscow principality "did not attack" Kazan for the first time. Then it "did not attack" Kazan in 1524, 1530, 1532, and only in 1552 Moscow "did not attack" for the last time, and staged a genocide of the Tatars. In order to "not attack" Muscovites staged punitive actions during which the population of entire Tatar villages was burned alive.
in 1554, Russia "did not attack" the Astrakhan Khanate, and "without attacking" staged the genocide of the Nogays and Tatars.
In 1558 Russia "did not attack" Latvia (Duchy of Courland)
and waged a war lasting 30 years in the order of "non-aggression".
in 1568 the Muscovite kingdom "did not attack" the Crimean Khanate in order to protect the Kabardian Muslim states from the Turks. The Crimeans did not understand the "humanitarian" aspirations of the Moscow tsar and in 1572 burned down Moscow.
from 1580 to 1582 Russia "did not attack" the Tatar states in Siberia and "without attacking" destroyed the cities of Yugra, Kishlyk and Isker. And the title "King of Siberia" was added to the title of the Moscow Tsar, of course, as a result of "protection of the borders."
then the whole 17th century, Russia "did not attack" Poland.
from 1672 to 1681 - Russia "defended the borders" by invading the Crimea, but was defeated. Therefore, she continued to "not attack" from 1686 to 1700.
in 1710 Russia "did not attack" Moldavia and Romania. But failed from the blows of the Turks.
Then "without attacking" Russia took the Duchy of Ingemanland from the Kingdom of Sweden. It took 20 whole years, from 1700 to 1721. During the "non-aggression" against Sweden, Russia destroyed several cities in Ukraine and staged a genocide of the population there. (Baturin massacre)
in 1736, Russia, wanting to annex Poland in alliance with Austria, "did not attack" Turkey.
in 1768 wishing to protect the Crimea and the Muslim peoples of the Caucasus from Turkey. Russia "did not attack" Turkey and achieved recognition of the complete independence of the Crimean Khanate in 1774. In order to "not attack" during the bloody war, annex Crimea in 1783.
In 1786, repulsing the treacherous attack on the Crimea, Russia defeated Turkey once again.
in 1806, Russia "did not attack" Moldavia in order to support the anti-Turkish uprising in Greece.
in 1808, Russia "did not attack" the Kingdom of Sweden in order to take away Finland, which it immediately annexed.
and in 1810 she peacefully annexed Georgia during a bloody war.
In 1812-13, Russia repulsed the attack of Napoleon, therefore she did not have time to “not attack” anyone.
But in 1817, Russia "did not attack" the Caucasus, the Caucasians did not understand the peaceful desire to expand the borders of Russia and resisted until 1864. How Russian troops "peacefully" carried out the genocide of the Caucasian peoples can be read in Tolstoy's story "Hadji Murad". for quotes from op from this story Facebook blocks.
In 1826, Russia "did not attack" Iran in order to protect its borders in Azerbaijan, which belonged to Iran.
с 1836 по 1847 Russia was forced not to attack the Kazakh states.
From 1839 to 1840, Russia "without attacking" tried to annex the Khorezm state to itself. But she was defeated.
In 1848, Russia "without attacking" helped to annex Hungary to Austria.
Without attacking the Emirate of Bukhara, Russia peacefully annexed it during the bloody wars of 1850-1854- 1868.
In 1854, Russia's non-aggression against Turkey occurred, resulting in the Crimean War, as a result of which Russia lost the Black Sea Fleet.
In 1868, the people of Uzbekistan rebelled against Russian rule and were brought into submission by peaceful punitive expeditions and humane acts of genocide.
Peacemaking actions continued until 1876
1877 - "not an attack" on Turkey in order to give Bulgaria independence.
1878 -1881 - peaceful annexation of Turkmenistan during bloody battles.
The year 1885 was not an attack on Afghanistan, and the defeat of British troops.
1891 -1894 was not an attack on the Pamirs.
1901 peaceful aid to Britain against the Boxer Rebellion. And the annexation of Manchuria
1904 - "not an attack" on Korea that led to war with Japan.
1909 non-aggression on Iran.
1915 -17 The First World War.
1916 -Humanitarian punitive actions against the anti-Russian uprising in Uzbekistan.
1918 - Not an attack on Lithuania, already recognized as an independent state.(defeat of the RSFSR)
1918 - Not an attack on Finland, already recognized as an independent state.(defeat of the RSFSR)
1918 is not an attack on Estonia, already recognized as an independent state.(defeat of the RSFSR)
1919- 1920 "not an attack" on Poland (defeat of the RSFSR)
1920 "not an attack" on Afghanistan (victory of the RSFSR, but without consequences)
1930 "not an attack" on Afghanistan (victory of the RSFSR, annexation of Badakhshan province)
1934 "not an attack" on China (victory of the USSR, control of Xinjiang province)
1939 "not an attack" on Finland 1939 "not an attack" on Poland, annexation of territories, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, western Ukraine and western Belarus.
1945 -54 exclusively "peaceful" punitive actions against the population of the territories, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, western Ukraine and western Belarus.
1956 "peaceful" suppression of the anti-communist uprising in Hungary.
The entry of Warsaw Pact troops (except Romania) into Czechoslovakia, which began on August 21, 1968 and put an end to the reforms of the Prague Spring. The end of the Prague spring, the signing of the Moscow Protocol, the Soviet military presence until 1991.
1979-1989 "not an attack" on Afghanistan.
1994-1996 the first "non-attack" on the Republic of Chechnya recognized by a sovereign state, accompanied by acts of genocide before which the blackest pages of the story "Hadji Murad" fade.
1999 second "not an attack" on the Republic of Chechnya recognized by a sovereign state.
2008 "not an attack" on Georgia.
2009 - 2017 "Fight against terrorism" by committing acts of terror and mass repression.
2014 - annexation of Crimea.
2018 - peaceful acts of terror against the civilian population of the Central African Republic, at the invitation of the "legitimate" Government.
2022 - "not an attack" on Ukraine with the aim of removing the legitimately elected government and establishing a Russian protectorate."

Exclusive: France and Germany evaded arms embargo to sell weapons to Russia - "France and Germany armed Russia with €273 million (£230 million) of military hardware now likely being used in Ukraine... The European Commission was this month forced to close a loophole in its blockade after it was found that at least 10 member states exported almost €350 million (£294 million) in hardware to Vladimir Putin’s regime. Some 78 per cent of that total was supplied by German and French firms."

Ukrainian helicopters blow up fuel depot in daring dawn raid inside Russian territory - "In the videos from Belgorod, some 25 miles from the Russia-Ukraine border, two Mi-24 helicopters were seen flying low before firing missiles at the depot - a tactic designed to avoid Russian radars, honed through training from the UK and other Western countries. Both Ukraine's foreign and defence ministries said they could neither confirm nor deny that Kyiv was behind the attack. "I am a civilian,” Dmytro Kuleba, the Ukrainian foreign minister cryptically replied when asked on Friday. It is the second time this week that Russian officials have accused Ukraine of attacking targets in Russia, prompting some Ukrainian officials to warn that it could be a "false flag" used by Moscow to justify reprisals. But this is the first time Ukraine is alleged to have conducted a full-blown air strike in Russian territory and if true, could mark a major escalation in the war and highlight Kyiv’s growing confidence since resisting Moscow’s invasion in late February... If the attack is confirmed, it suggests Ukraine is having increasing success sending in helicopter pilots taught to fly low to avoid Russian radars, despite the heightened risk of attacks from shoulder-mounted missiles. With support from the UK, the US and other Western military powers, Ukraine has increased its training for its helicopter pilots since Russia and Russia-backed separatists grabbed parts of the eastern edge of Ukraine in a 2014 war... on Tuesday, the Russian authorities said that Ukraine had shelled an army camp, also near Belgorod."

EU strikes gas deal with the U.S. as it seeks to cut its reliance on Russia - "Revenue from Russian oil and gas was seen to be responsible for roughly 43% of the Kremlin’s federal budget between 2011 and 2020, highlighting how fossil fuels play a central role for the Russian government."

Elon Musk Starlink Satellites Helping Ukraine Fight War: Soldier - "an elite Ukrainian drone unit is using Starlink to destroy dozens of Russian targets in the night time. "If we use a drone with thermal vision at night, the drone must connect through Starlink to the artillery guy and create target acquisition""
The NPCs must be very confused about what to do when one program conflicts with another

Russia admits ‘significant losses of troops’ in Ukraine - "In a rare admission, the Kremlin said Russia has suffered “significant losses” in Ukraine amounting to a “huge tragedy” for the country. “Yes, we have significant losses of troops and it is a huge tragedy for us,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told Sky News... At least 1,500 civilians have been killed so far, according to the United Nations, which fears the real number to be far higher. Casualties on the Russian side have been harder to assess with the country’s defence minister saying on March 25 – its most recent update – that 1,351 of its soldiers have been killed in combat, while 3,825 were wounded. Ukraine says 19,000 Russian soldiers have been killed. However, experts say figures by both parties cannot be trusted as Kyiv is likely to inflate them to boost the morale of its troops, while Russia is probably downplaying them... In line with Russia’s stance on the alleged atrocities it is accused of in Bucha, Peskov insisted that images showing dead bodies were staged. Since journalists were allowed to enter the small town on March 31, evidence has mounted suggesting that a massacre took place, triggering global outrage and further sanctions."
Damn CIA!

The Russian military is losing so much equipment that weapons monitors are overwhelmed - "During the first three weeks of the conflict, when Russia’s forces appeared to be beset with logistical and fuel problems, videos of Ukrainian farmers towing away abandoned Russian military vehicles seemed to emerge at least one a day – so much so that it became a meme... “I think contrary to what a lot of people expected, we’re talking about near-peer conflict. Because of that, the scale [of Russian losses] is just huge”"

Here's why Russian tanks keep getting their turrets blown off in Ukraine - "Known as the “jack-in-the-box effect,” this type of apocalyptic explosion is caused when a blast’s heat or shockwave causes all the tank’s ammunition to detonate. The resulting overpressure blows the tank’s turret straight up into the air. Russian-made T-72 and T-80 tanks are particularly susceptible to being destroyed in this manner, in part because they both have autoloading mechanisms that store tank rounds in a carousel at the base of the turret, said Steven Zaloga, an expert on Russian and Soviet armor. Those autoloaders typically store about 20 rounds when fully loaded... Soviet and Russian tanks have been losing their turrets due to catastrophic ammunition explosions long before the current conflict in Ukraine, Zaloga said. Iraq’s Soviet-made tanks showed the same vulnerabilities during Operation Desert Storm, as did Syrian tanks in previous wars. During wars in Chechnya, the Russians were able to reduce their losses by having their tanks carry fewer rounds so that all the ammunition and propellant was stored in the autoloaders, Zaloga said. “The problem is, in many combat situations, you don’t want to go out with partial ammunition loads,” Zaloga said. “If you get into a serious firefight, you’re going to go through 20, 22 rounds of ammunition pretty quickly.” In contrast to Russian tank designs, the U.S. military’s M1 Abrams tanks store their ammunition in a way that protects the crew if any of the rounds or propellant explode... The differences between how the M1 and Russian tanks store ammunition reveal the drastically different philosophies that both militaries have on survivability"

Facebook - "For all his faults, "Orange man mad" was an actual deterrent. Russia, China, North Korea... all of them were flummoxed by a President who was unpredictable, and thus didn't dare to overstep. It's like fighting a hobo vs fighting regular Joe in a bar. You know Joe will at most punch you. Perhaps hit you with a barstool if things get messy. But you don't know if the hobo would go nuts at the barest provocation and suddenly try to eat your face. So you don't push your luck and provoke the hobo."

The Silksworth Post on Twitter - "BREAKING: The Latvian Parliament has passed a bill permitting those who support the Russian invasion of Ukraine to be stripped of citizenship."

Ukraine and big power rivalry: Why the urge to ‘compare rottenness’ will lead Singapore nowhere - "Ukraine has thus become a theatre in larger identity wars, an occasion to score points for one’s team or deduct points from the other. Many are so psyched up for this contest that they suppress their genetically inherited capacity to care about fellow human beings, lest images of corpses and refugees soften their resolve to serve as ideological foot soldiers for their chosen side. We share people’s scepticism when a US president claims moral leadership in international relations. But, that is no reason to discard our own moral compass — which is effectively what we’d be doing if we harden our hearts to the humanitarian cost of Russia’s behaviour. Decolonising our worldviews requires us to see events independently of where big powers stand. To fail to do the right thing because it happens to coincide with what the US wants is not a mark of a self-assured society. It is a form of overly simplistic, dispositional thinking — in this case, “US, bad; anything non-US or anti-US, good” — unsuited to life in a complex world... One can most definitely do two things at once: criticise American aggression and hypocrisy, yet at the same time condemn Russia’s invasion. In fact, that is the most reasonable thing to do... We are hardly paragons of virtue in our global outlook. For example, pro-China Singaporeans have been quite silent about the plight of brown Muslims in Kashmir and brown victims of military-led violence in Myanmar — including the mass atrocity against Rohingya... If, as many have observed, Singaporeans are less pro-Russia than they are anti-US, we should consider what good such US-centricity does us or the world. Putting the US front and centre elevates it to the “city on a hill” that many in the US like to think of themselves — the key point of reference against which to measure our fears and hopes. It need not be. If we care about justice, we should focus instead on figuring out what behaviours are acceptable or not, regardless of who engages in them... It is no accident that Chinese propaganda has resonated among many Singaporeans. Analysts of both Chinese and Russian propaganda over the past several years tell us that these states have latched onto a strategy of exploiting latent anti-Western (and, in the West, anti-establishment) sentiment in publics around the world. Historians would tell us that this is hardly a new strategy for rising powers. Imperial Japan disseminated anti-colonial propaganda throughout Asia to persuade subjugated Asians to support “liberation” under a Japanese-led “co-prosperity sphere”. Contemporary Chinese propaganda and outreach efforts, in particular, aim to activate the loyalties of ethnic Han communities around the world and tie them to the interests of the PRC state. Segments of the ethnic Chinese population in Singapore, with our less developed sense of national identity, may be more susceptible to such persuasion."

Joe Biden says US troops will be in Ukraine in apparent gaffe - "A White House official quickly clarified that Biden wasn’t changing his stance on deploying the military into Ukraine... It’s not the first time that Biden made an imprecise remark during his third trip abroad as president. During a 19-minute press conference in Belgium, Biden said Thursday that the US response to Russian troops using chemical weapons “would depend on the nature of the use” — then turned heads by saying the US would respond “in kind.”"

Chaos as Joe Biden says Vladimir Putin ‘cannot remain in power’ - "Joe Biden appeared to call for regime change in Russia, as he said that Vladimir Putin “cannot remain in power” in a highly charged speech in Warsaw... The White House immediately sought to clarify Mr Biden’s comments, insisting his statement should not be taken as official policy. White House insiders said that the president’s remarks on removing Putin from power were not planned and came as a surprise to travelling officials... Aaron David Miller, a former US State Department adviser, said that to Russian ears, Mr Biden’s comment “only confirms what Putin has believed all along: US policy is regime change, thereby ensuring this becomes a fight not just for Ukraine but for Putin’s survival”... The missile strikes on Lviv appeared to highlight growing splits between the Kremlin and its generals, who had suggested Russian forces were preparing to scale back their invasion."
When the President's words aren't official policy, that suggests that he's senile and/or that he's not the one running the show

Backlash against Joe Biden over Vladimir Putin ‘cannot remain in power’ comment - "Joe Biden is facing an international backlash from his own allies after calling for regime change in Russia. Emmanuel Macron led a chorus of disapproval following the US president’s comments, in which he called Vladimir Putin a “butcher” and insisted the Russian premier “cannot remain in power”. Downing Street said it was for the Russian people to choose their leader, while Mr Biden’s own secretary of state contradicted the president in an attempt to limit the diplomatic fallout... A senior US diplomat said Mr Biden had “made a dangerous situation more dangerous” and threatened to “extend the scope and duration” of the conflict... It is seen as the latest in a series of potentially dangerous missteps in recent weeks. A month before the war, the 79-year-old president suggested Russia would face minimal consequences if it restrained itself to a “minor incursion”. Mr Biden suggested last week that Nato would respond "in kind" if the Kremlin deployed chemical weapons. He also called Putin a “war criminal” after hurriedly changing his mind during an exchange with a reporter. At the weekend, he told US troops in Poland that they would witness the bravery of Ukrainian soldiers “when you’re there” - forcing the White House to quickly clarify that American soldiers were not being sent over the border... In the US, there was a recognition that Mr Biden had made a serious error of judgment. Richard Haass, an American diplomat who heads the Council on Foreign Relations, said... 'The White House walk back of @POTUS regime change call is unlikely to wash. Putin will see it as confirmation of what he’s believed all along. Bad lapse in discipline that runs risk of extending the scope and duration of the war.'"
Hilariously I saw a lot of apologists claim he was not calling for regime change. Apparently the European leaders and Richard Haass all missed the memo

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Latest posts (which you might not see on this page)

powered by Blogger | WordPress by Newwpthemes