John Carter on X - "The embarrassing thing for the left isn't that Arday was a conman, it's that he was a retarded conman who couldn't even tell halfway credible lies, and every single empty headed leftist academic fell for it hook, line, and sinker without pausing for even a moment to question him."
Angela Linton on X - "Seems to me that Ardays downfall was not the plagiarism it was his tall tales which caught the attention of the public. Most non academics are not very interested in plagarism if Jason had been just another race grifter the story might have blown over."
Max Adler on X - "The important question now: if DEI enabled a total fraud like Arday to escape scrutiny on a stage as big as Cambridge, what’s going on at the university near you?"
Fartrapist666 on X - "I doubt even a majority of them fell for the lies, but I'm sure all of them were certain they'd be, at best, fired for saying anything."
Hiram Finnegan on X - "I suppose. But after seeing otherwise intelligent people earnestly argue that transgenderism is healthy and not a mental disorder, I've realized that most people can not resist tribalism. Not to put too fine a point on it, transgenderism is about the most absurd possible take."
NateGraynor on X - "They really have only two possible fallback positions. "I fell for a series of painfully obvious lies." "I knew he was full of it and promoted him anyway." Any third positions are indefensible and reduce to those two in the end. They will, however, beclown themselves for another few months before beginning to admit one or the other. It's in their nature."
Simon Bern on X - "Fallback position #3: “EVERYONE IS RACIST!!!!!”"
Meme - Helena Horton @horton_official: "It was right for the Guardian to publish its investigation, and it is wrong that the journalists who did their job responsibly are now being subjected to an onslaught of abuse."
Dr Nafeez Ahmed: "I'm a former Guardian journalist. The Guardian's demonstrably did not do its job responsibly. It published hyperbolic, unverified, speculative inferences without real merit. This is now a matter of record, and history will be the judge:"
Marjorie Hutchins @leakylike: "Or maybe not actually..."
Dr Nafeez Ahmed: "so prickery it is then. I was a freelance writer contracted to run a Guardian environment blog. I was not a salaried, in-house staff reporter and I've never claimed I was."
Charles Arthur @charlesarthur: "Come on. "Former Guardian journalist" overstates your relationship to the paper. "Former Guardian blogger" would be accurate. When you start with an exaggeration about yourself, you undermine everything else you say. Surely by now people are absorbing this lesson?"
"This post is unavailable."
No wonder Nafeez Ahmed blocked Marjorie Hutchins. Left wingers hate the truth being exposed and try to suppress it
Meme - "REMEMBER KIDS, YOU DON'T NEED TO WORK HARD TO GET SOMEWHERE IN THIS WORLD! *Jason Arday* BLACK LIES MATTER"
Meme - *Jason Arday* "BLACK LIES MATTER"
Meme - "*Ann Widdecombe*
"DON'T DARE POLITICISE HER MURDER" *mute button*
*Jason Arday*
"GET READY FOR US TO POLITICISE HIS SUICIDE AND KEEP IT RUNNING FOR AS LONG AS POSSIBLE" *microphone*
Arday and the Left - "With a little political Jiu Jitsu, we can turn this whole thing to our advantage. Here’s how.
1. Make Arday a martyr
2. Reframe the rightwing frame
3. Mobilize allies
4. Find better symbols
5. Make sacrifices
6. Make it about race, race, race"
Meme - "To ensure that the United Kingdom continues to be a safe place for all to flourish, we will urgently push the Government to act decisively and urgently, introducing legislation which protects individuals from such extreme harassment. We will remember Jason with honour, pride and gratitude for all he did for the world. We will miss you. Rest in peace, Professor Jason Arday. - Joint Statement by the Parliamentary Black Caucus. Dawn Butler MP, Chair of Parliamentary Black Caucus"
Black politicians believe that holding black people accountable is racist
Meme - BijanOmrani: ""I take academic quality and integrity very seriously... Was Jason Arday a plagarist and a fabulist? I don't know and I really don't care" says university professor and chair of examiners. Incredible."
Glen OBrien: "I serve as Chair of Examiners in Australia's smallest university, The University of Divinity. It's part of my job to respond to charges of plagiarism and other breaches of academic integrity. I read the examination reports of every Higher Degree by Research and make a determination about the results. I take academic quality and integrity very seriously. My heart is weighed down with sorrow at the death of Cambridge academic, Professor Jason Arday. The pile on from those who considered his appointment to be 'woke' DEI gone mad has been sickening. Even after his death, people are still piling on their accusations, led by those with discredited racist theories of eugenics and white supremacy. The question that has played out in the public square is whether we should give 'minorities' extra supports or additional consideration, a 'leg up' in their careers that white people like me might not be given. For the record, I believe we should. After hundreds of years of systemic exclusion from such academic posts and opportunities, we should bend over backwards to provide additional supports to such people, to move over and give others the opportunity they deserve. Was Jason Arday a plagiarist and a fabulist? I don't know and I really don't care. Whatever he may or may not have done, it pales in comparison with what imperialism and racism have delivered to Black and brown people everywhere. Forget the acronym, 'DEI', which has just become a lightning rod for racist bigotry. I believe in and support diversity, equity, and inclusion in academia, and will unapologetically continue to do whatever I can to make it a reality in the little corner of academia where I have some influence. Rest in peace Jason Arday and rise in power."
Meme - "THE *black* VICTIMHOOD CYCLE
Do things that are immoral, unethical, or illegal -> blame white people-> face accountability for doing things that are immoral, unethical, or illegal -> blame white people->Do things that are immoral, unethical, or illegal"
"The Media Lynched Jason Arday"
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) - (Global Compact Network UK)
More than half of UK businesses changing DEI approach due to Trump’s criticism | DEI policies | The Guardian
Future-Proof Your DEI Strategy in the UK | Compliance Guide
Diversity, Equity & Inclusion in the UK: A Comprehensive Guide
The future of DEI: are UK companies withdrawing their DEI policies?
Diversity, equity and inclusion (Association of Charitable Foundations)
Diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policy (short form) | Practical Law
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Programme | CJBS Executive Education (Cambridge Judge Business School)
Do Britons think ‘DEI’ initiatives have gone too far in the UK?
Weird. Left wingers were claiming that there was no such thing as DEI in the UK, so those who criticised it had no idea what they were talking about and had no right to have an opinion (in Canada, left wingers sometimes also use the claim that there's no freedom of speech in Canada, only freedom of expression, to dismiss those who criticise their authoritarianism). Ridiculous nitpicking based on terms aside, it isn't even correct
Meme - Spirited1 @helen_spirit1: "One transforms kids rejected by grammar schools into outstanding students. The other defrauded his students by lying about his achievements & stole other's work. One is despised by the left for rejecting woke culture, the other, lauded by them. Both, victims of the left. *Katharine Birbalsingh and Jason Arday*"
Meme - Jack Genesis @Jovianmoon: "You lot killed him. You. You were the ones who propped him up, fed him the lies, and loaded him with the crushing weight of unearned merit. You did that. You're still doing it. You used him while he lived. Now you're using his corpse for clicks."
Dr Nafeez Ahmed on X - "EXCLUSIVE: Jason Arday was targeted in a coordinated campaign by an anti-black race science network with ties to Cambridge and pro-Trump billionaire Peter Thiel, whipping up a catalogue of systemic misinformation across the British press 🧵/1"
i/o on X - "Here are just a few of the outlandish fabrications your dead hero engaged in:
Extensive plagiarism in his 2015 PhD thesis: More than 100 passages identical or nearly identical to Paula Zwozdiak-Myers’s 2009 Brunel University thesis.
False funding declarations in research: Claims of funding (including from Mind) that the organization denied.
Claimed authorship of a published book Being Young, Black and Male: Challenging the Dominant Discourse (Palgrave Macmillan) that was never published.
False or exaggerated academic positions and qualifications: Visiting professor at University of Glasgow School of Education (denied); visiting professor at Ohio State University Office of Diversity and Inclusion (denied; office later closed); visiting professor at Nelson Mandela University (at most a temporary adjunct); honorary professor at Durham (contradicted); master’s in psychodynamic counselling/practice from Birkbeck (no record).thetimes.com
Non-verbal/mute until age 11 (or profound non-verbal autism from early childhood): Diagnosed at age 3 with autism, global developmental delay, etc., and claimed doctors said he would never walk, talk, or read (“no better than a vegetable”); schoolmates, neighbors, and others described a verbal child who joked, imitated voices, played football, and was “just normal” or a “class clown.” Experts noted the claimed trajectory had no precedent.
Illiterate until age 18 (or unable to read/write until late teens): Contradicted by school records/experiences and recollections; accounts of when/how he learned varied (e.g., vs. statements involving his then-partner).
Running 30 marathons in 35 days (around 2010), including continuing after an epileptic seizure/fit and hairline leg fracture on roughly the 20th/21s.
Running 600 miles in six days (Edinburgh–London or treadmill, for charity): Would rank among elite ultra-endurance performances; later revised to ~12 days with rest days for “cumulative wear and tear.”
Raising £5–5.5 million+ for charity (often via the above running feats, “most notably” for Shooting Star Children’s Hospices and Shelter, over ~20 years, sometimes framed as personal): Evidence showed far smaller documented sums (e.g., one JustGiving page at £380); later clarified as part of a “syndicate”/collective of ~100 under NDAs (none named); bios and speeches escalated the figure over time; publisher later softened related memoir http://language.spectator.com
Installing water points/pumps in South America (e.g., Rio favelas) and West Africa with/for WaterAid: WaterAid stated it does not send volunteers abroad and does not encourage/facilitate self-funded visits.
Appearance in the BBC’s Seven Up documentary series: Claimed participation (or being “pulled out” at 14); the original series began in 1964 (Arday born 1985); BBC stated he had “nothing to do with our films.”
Academy-level and/or semi-professional football career: Claimed in at least one speaking engagement; not detailed or repeated in the memoir, with no club specified
Substantial prize money from local snooker competitions while at secondary school (enough that his mother suspected drug dealing): Records (e.g., CueTracker) show limited amateur participation with no significant winnings.
Corporal punishment at secondary school (teachers striking knuckles with a pen for incomplete tasks): Corporal punishment was banned in English state schools in 1987 (Arday born 1985).
Threats by a masked intruder (twice, once at knifepoint) in his Cambridge faculty building, demanding resignation: No CCTV capture, not reported contemporaneously to colleagues/police in full detail, panic alarm response issues noted, and he continued work (including a viva).
Severed pig’s head delivered to his family home in south London (plus related claims of investigation linking it to a local butcher who sold a whole pig that morning): Metropolitan Police stated “categorically” that no such investigation occurred; the butcher had no recollection of police contact or the sale in that context.
Major medical/life events with inconsistencies across accounts): Teenage car accident leading to months in a (conscious) coma/locked-in syndrome, doctors suggesting switching off life support, then relearning to walk/talk (in proposal; omitted from final book); testicular cancer (proposal) vs. one or two brain tumors (book/other accounts); origin stories for epilepsy varying.
Additional disputed or unsupported elements appearing in bios, speeches, or the memoir proposal: Carrying the Olympic Torch (2012); various unproven awards/accolades; a claimed large book advance; and the resignation letter itself flagged by some AI detectors as fully machine-generated."
Bley Mingus on X - ""Non-verbal/mute until age 11" I find this lie far more serious than most people. It is impossible to become a fluent adult speaker after being non-verbal at such a late stage, no documented cases exists. The scandal for me is that Professor Baron-Cohen at Cambridge (a specialist in autism) was mute about this lie and allowed Arday to give false hope to parents of autistic children. Cohen should be questioned by the media about his unconditional support for Arday."
Nathan Cofnas, the Controversial Academic Who Ignited the Jason Arday Furor - WSJ - "Cofnas, speaking from Belgium in one of his first interviews since Arday’s death, said he doesn’t regret publishing his Substack post. But he also said Arday was unfairly hounded by the press and let down by Cambridge University, which overpromoted him and then abandoned him when under scrutiny. Cambridge said it provided Arday with mental-health support, and has launched an investigation into its hiring practices. “I was part of a series of causes that led to that outcome,” but “you have to be allowed to criticize powerful people,” Cofnas said of Arday and his death. “The British media published 249 articles about Arday in a 22-day period. I published one article, which was 100% factual,” he said... He has received death threats and a wave of hate mail... Research over decades shows a strong interaction between most biological traits and the environment, debunking the idea that genetics is the main determinant of behavioral traits like intelligence, said Marcus W. Feldman, biology professor at Stanford University. Feldman said making such claims is also dangerous. “I’m worried [that] the rise of hereditarianism is taking along with it racism,” he said. “Strong hereditarianism can be the antecedent to very bad social policies,” Feldman explained, citing the Nazis’ use of eugenics to pursue racial purity as an example. Cofnas denied that he is racist and said academics have a duty to question the assumption that all groups of humans are born intellectually equal. In 2018, Cofnas argued in a paper that technology would soon allow this unknown to be hurdled. “We have failed to work through the moral implications of group differences to prepare for the possibility that they will be shown to exist,” he wrote... Cofnas argues that hereditarianism isn’t about skin color per se. He has written that in the U.S., for instance, “rednecks” are likely to have lower IQs than other American whites. He points out that Blacks who migrated to the U.K. on average perform better in school than British whites... after a talk on wokeism to the Catholic Flemish Student Union, a student threw a bottle filled with yogurt at his face. Cofnas said he was treated for concussion. It was around this time that a former colleague at Cambridge got in touch and tipped Cofnas off about Arday. Questions about the professor’s meteoric rise and astonishing back story had been circulating for a few years in academic circles... Cofnas wasn’t the first to find Arday’s work suspicious... [After other whistleblowers were threatened by the police and lawyers] Cofnas took it upon himself to break the story. He said he had no qualms about publishing. “Arday was a powerful, influential, famous person who sought his position, who manipulated people to obtain it,” he said."
Russell T. Warne 🇺🇸🇨🇱 on X - ""Research over decades shows substantial heritability for most biological traits, debunking the idea that environment is the main determinant of behavioral traits like intelligence, said Marcus W. Feldman, biology professor at Stanford University. Feldman said making such claims is also dangerous. "'I’m worried [that] the rise of environmentalism is taking along with it blank slatism,' he said. 'Strong environmentalism can be the antecedent to very bad social policies,' Feldman explained, citing the Soviets' use of communism and Lysenkoism to pursue economic equality as an example.""
Left wings cheer on harassment and death threats when it's against people they hate
Sadly, Pinker also says that some things should not be researched; this is a standard view for left wingers (does the same hold for gain of function research?)
Thread by @mboudry on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "Here is the full letter from Ghent University suspending @nathancofnas. As you can see, it’s one long heckler’s veto: the decision is not so much about Cofnas’ actual violations as about the flood of complaints and protests the rector has received, the reputational damage to the university, the cancellations by certain speakers, the possible boycott against UGent due to Cofnas' appointment, etc. The letter holds Cofnas accountable for all the “tension and unrest” his presence has caused (even though he never even shows up on campus), and for the “severe psychological distress” among students and the “negative impact on the well-being” of colleagues. Since the rector is transgender, here’s an analogy she might appreciate: this suspension is like banning a Pride event in a city because of the “unrest and tension” (read: anti-LGBT violence) the organizers are “causing” among religious fanatics. Or excluding trans women from political positions because of the “psychological distress” they may cause to people who believe in a sex binary. It’s even worse than a conventional heckler’s veto, because I know that the rector has actively encouraged the “hecklers” to flood her with complaints, thereby giving the university a stick to beat the dog with. Shockingly, the letter documents that Cofnas has called Jason Arday a “worthless scholar.” Someone fire that miscreant, please! Never mind that “mentally disabled” is pretty much how Arday described himself—being functionally illiterate, reading only one page per hour, etc. Describing Cofnas’ exposure of serious fraud and plagiarism as a “targeted campaign of professional elimination” is just completely deluded, and buying into the far-left narrative hook, line and sinker. Once again, none of this is to imply that I agree with Cofnas’ views on race, his calls for a “hereditarian revolution,” his statements about Arday, or anything else. This is purely about academic freedom, something the rector understands absolutely nothing about. Right after taking office, she declared that academics questioning the “genocide” in Gaza or the safety of vaccines would no longer be protected by academic freedom: “This is a line that cannot be crossed.” (She was specifically targeting me at the time, when I still worked for UGent.) And that’s not even mentioning the fact that the rector used AI-hallucinated quotations in her inaugural speech and then covered it up and lied about it—which has nothing to do with ideology, just sheer incompetence and dishonesty. I’m almost inclined to call her a “worthless scholar.” But as Einstein probably never said at the Sorbonne in 1929: “Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe.”
*text of letter*
This internal email from a tenured professor at Nathan Cofnas’ department shows not only that the “barrage” of complaints about the “negative effects on well-being” was perfectly coordinated, but that it was explicitly encouraged by rector Petra De Sutter herself. If this is true, she was actively egging on the hecklers in order to grant them a veto, which makes the whole affair even worse."
Committee for Academic Freedom on X - "Concerning to see the way The National has reported the story of more than 800 academics signing an open letter raising concerns about disciplinary proceedings against Dr Nathan Cofnas at Ghent University. Signatories to a public letter can obviously be named and reported on. But “8 Scottish academics sign letter defending Nathan Cofnas over Jason Arday pile-on” is a misleading description of the position those academics were actually taking. Rather than defend Cofnas’s substantive views, the letter argues that academic freedom must encompass the scrutiny of alleged research misconduct, and raises concerns about Ghent treating hostile third-party reactions, including threatened boycotts, as grounds for disciplining the academic targeted by them. More troublingly, the article identifies eight Scottish signatories individually, names their universities, and then reports that those universities “have been contacted for comment”. Comment on what, exactly? The article identifies no misconduct by these academics, no breach of university rules and no other reason why their employers should be expected to account for what they have signed. Unfortunately, this is not the only outlet now reporting on signatories in this way. And CAF encounters the consequences of involving an academic’s employer in controversies over their lawful speech rather too often. What begins as somebody drawing an academic’s public comments to their university’s attention can end with the academic being contacted by HR about the “tone and nature” of their comments, reputational concerns, or some variant thereof. We have no reason to suppose that these universities will respond in that way. But if you have signed this letter and subsequently find yourself under institutional pressure — or are experiencing something similar in another context — do get in touch with CAF. As well as engaging directly with universities on behalf of academics facing threats to their academic freedom, where appropriate we also obtain and fund specialist legal representation. You can contact us at manager@afcomm.org.uk, or through the case submission form on our website."
i/o on X - "Over the past week, I've asked a number of accounts who have argued that Nathan Cofnas engages in "pseudoscience" or "eugenics" to explain how SPECIFICALLY he does this, and not one of them has responded, not even after I ratio'd them in their replies.
"Pseudoscience" and "eugenics" are just empty slurs hurled by people who know nothing about the subject areas that Cofnas is interested in."
Nemesis 2026 on X - "I continue to request a definition of "race science", but get nothing."
Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 on X - "Just learned that a lot of Arday’s papers were “autoethnography” where he would basically interview himself about the experience of being a black academic with autism and then quote the interview and analyse it. Fascinating."
Max Klinger on X - "People really do not understand just how much of what gets passed off as ‘profound’ and even ‘seminal’ academic research in the social sciences and humanities is just absolute, pseudo-scientific, progressive activism and woowoo. This was glaringly obvious to me, even as a young and ideologically (at that point) left wing student at Cambridge, and would be to most of the rest of the country if they were exposed to it. The basic lack of rigour and the obvious ridiculousness of stuff like a man interviewing himself about why he thinks he’s experienced racism, or cartoons being described as instruments of imperialist domination (based on nothing), or the pre-modern beliefs of uncivilised tribesmen being treated as ‘true’ even if they believe they can use magic and cast spells and so on, is self-evident (all real examples btw, you can look each one up). Academics who willingly promote this stuff are engaged in intellectual fraud."
Φασολάκια on X - "And then it’s laundered by them citing each other"
Max Klinger on X - "That’s the real kicker which very few people understand"
Jennifer Thetford-Kay on X - "This letter is exactly right.... Jason Arday held multiple positions of real influence; Cambridge professor, college fellow, trustee of major organisations, advisor to ITV and the NHS. Public scrutiny of his academic work and claimed achievements was not only legitimate, it was necessary. Blaming journalists and academics for his tragic death, calling it a “lynching,” or demanding the press be reined in is reckless. It prioritises feelings over truth and seeks to chill free speech and academic freedom. Powerful people must still be held to account. The focus should be on standards in academia, not silencing those who examine them."
You're only allowed to speak truth to power if it pushes the left wing agenda
The UWI pays tribute to Prof Jason Arday | News Extra | trinidadexpress.com
KEVIN BALDEOSINGH | Facebook - "Does this mean that, when black UWI students commit plagiarism or some other transgression, they will be excused because of "systemic racism"? Will they have to undergo a DNA test to ensure they have no white ancestors, or will phenotype eyeballing be sufficient? Can we be sure Kareem Marcelle, for example, wasn't marked easier than other law students to compensate for the legacy of slavery?"

