When you can't live without bananas

Get email updates of new posts:        (Delivered by FeedBurner)

Friday, January 17, 2025

Links - 17th January 2025 (California Wildfires)

Meme - ">1920
>be californian
>get duped into buying Australian eucalyptus trees
>plant thousands of acres
>Australians forget to mention it takes at least 100 years for the trees to mature
thousands of investors go broke
>100 years later eucalyptus trees have spread everywhere and have finally matured
>Australians also forgot to mention the trees produce a highly flammable toxic oil that builds up in the tree
>california burns down"

Los Angeles hydrants are running out of water because no one filled the reservoirs, but at least they have their first-ever lesbian fire chief who made it her mission to hire more women? - "What did she do once in the position? Create a DEI bureau, of course!! 👇... LA residents should be asking why so much time, money, and energy was spent touting a lesbian fire chief and her desire to make the department more diverse instead of spending that time on refilling water reservoirs, hiring the best people, buying the best equipment, and practicing for wildfires."
Clearly, if they had made the department more diverse, it would have functioned better, so we need even more diversity

Sara Foster on X - "We pay the highest taxes in California. Our fire hydrants were empty. Our vegetation was overgrown, brush not cleared. Our reservoirs were emptied by our governor because tribal leaders wanted to save fish. Our fire department budget was cut by our mayor. But thank god drug addicts are getting their drug kits. @MayorOfLA  @GavinNewsom  RESIGN. Your far left policies have ruined our state. And also our party."

Meme - "When the highly-flammable eucalyptus trees you sold to California in 1920 fully matures 100 years later and the mayor blames climate change and Trump. *Crocodile Dundee with Crocodile, Kangaroo and Australian flag*"

LA Fire Chief warned $18M budget cuts would affect response to large-scale emergencies - "The LA Fire Chief warned in the weeks before the devastating Palisades fire that the decision to cut the department's budget by nearly $18 million would diminish its ability to prepare for and respond to large scale emergencies."

Mayor Karen Bass faces fierce criticism for overseas trip, budget cuts as LA fires rage - "Rick Caruso, a real estate developer and former mayoral candidate, criticized Bass for her absence, saying, “This is an absolute mismanagement by the city and I’m going to be very honest, we’ve got a mayor that’s out of the country and we’ve got a city that’s burning.”"

Meme - "Don't you just hate it when climate change hires a fire-chief based on pronouns, gives away fire equipment to Ukraine, mismanages forests, tears down dams, refuses to fill existing water reservoirs, cancels fire insurance, and lays off firefighters for refusing an experimental vaccine?"

John Durant on X - "It may surprise you to learn that the state that took 38 days to count votes in the presidential election isn’t at all prepared for wildfires."

Meme - Crying Newscum: "It's not our fault! We don't have enough firefighters!!"
"This you?" "113 LAFD FIREFIGHTERS REMOVED FROM DUTY WITHOUT PAY FOR FAILING TO MEET CITY'S VACCINATION MANDATE"

Gavin Newsom on X - "NEW: Just issued an Executive Order that will allow victims of the SoCal fires to not get caught up in bureaucratic red tape and quickly rebuild their homes. We are also extending key price gouging protections to help make rebuilding more affordable."
Why is bureaucratic red tape a good thing normally then?
Good luck when building materials are scarce and no one wants to bring more in

Newsom Has a Permitting Epiphany - WSJ - "More than 12,000 structures in the Los Angeles region have been destroyed by the past week’s fires. At California’s glacial pace of permitting, it could take years for new homes and businesses to rise from the ashes. Rebuilding will cost multiples more than original construction owing to more stringent building codes, high permitting fees and inflation.  That explains Mr. Newsom’s executive order on Sunday waiving the state’s Environmental Quality Act and Coastal Act. He directed his administration to identify other burdensome permitting and building code requirements that can be eased. This is an admission that state regulations increase costs and delay projects, if they don’t stop them entirely.   Green groups and unions exploit the state’s environmental laws to tie up projects for years in court. Developers often settle lawsuits by making concessions—for example, setting aside land for conservation or using union labor—that increase project costs.  Local governments impose excessive permitting fees and other requirements to mitigate a project’s impact. The Supreme Court’s landmark County of El Dorado ruling last year requires such fees to be commensurate to a project’s impact, though local governments can still tie developers up in red tape to force them to make costly concessions.  A 2021 University of Southern California survey of California developers found that it typically took 18 to 45 months—yes, months—for a project to be approved. Half said they had abandoned projects owing to government fees, and 45% said they were required to substantially reduce a project’s density. More than half reported that lawsuits had scuttled projects, and 37% said legal settlements equaled at least half a project’s worth. Unnecessarily burdensome building codes also balloon costs. New homes in California must comply with efficiency standards that add tens of thousands of dollars to the price. California also mandates solar panels on new homes. Onerous licensing requirements restrict the supply of general contractors and increase labor costs.  All of this explains why “affordable” housing units can cost $1 million to build and the state has a severe housing shortage. The Los Angeles metro area’s population is larger than that of Dallas and Houston combined, but the latter together permitted more than five times as many new homes last year. This is why the median home in Los Angeles County costs $1 million.  California’s environmental laws also delay and inflate costs of needed public works, when they don’t kill them. A new large reservoir hasn’t been built in the state for 50 years. The California Coastal Commission in 2022 nixed a proposed desalination plant in Huntington Beach. Even Mr. Newsom’s Delta water tunnel project and bullet train have been snagged by green tape.  Ditto fire prevention since permits and habitat mitigation are required to clear brush, widen fire access roads and create fire breaks on public lands, especially along the coast, such as where the Palisades fire is burning. If Mr. Newsom agrees that the state’s environmental laws are a problem, why doesn’t he at least try to reform them?  The reason is Democrats in Sacramento are beholden to the green lobby, which opposes most development and uses the laws to extort businesses. It’s nice of Mr. Newsom to ease permitting so L.A.’s affluent can rebuild. Perhaps he’s worried they might leave if it takes too long or costs too much to rebuild. Moonscape neighborhoods wouldn’t look good if he runs for President in 2028, or when the Olympics comes to town the same year.  But what about all the others who are leaving the state because they can’t afford its astronomical housing prices?"
Why doesn't Newsom get that regulations are meant to protect people from corporate greed and exploitation, as well as conserve the environment, and that dismantling all regulations is the endgame of neoliberal fascism?!
Time for left wingers to mock blue states again

Meme - End Wokeness @EndWokeness: Blue-haired woman saved by white man: "Stop put me down — I wanted to be saved by firefighters who look like meeeeee"

Californians voted to spend billions on more water storage. But state government keeps sitting on the cash - Los Angeles Times
From 2018. Damn climate change, corporate greed and deregulation!

Fed Scientist Rejects ‘Climate Change’ as Fueling L.A. Fires, as Arson Reports Surface - "Jon Keeley, U.S. Geological Survey scientist, has told Public, “I don't think these fires are the result of climate change. You certainly could get these events without climate change.”  Keeley, who has been researching the topic for four decades, across nearly 40 U.S. regions, highlighted the human element: “humans may not only influence fire regimes but their presence can actually override, or swamp out, the effects of climate.”   He explained, “We’ve looked at the history of climate and fire throughout the whole state, and through much of the state, particularly the western half of the state, we don’t see any relationship between past climates and the amount of area burned in any given year.” California is not having extreme or even very unusual weather, no matter what media talking heads say... at least one homeless man was caught by concerned citizens who saw him lighting fires in Los Angeles. The UK Daily Mail reported that two men were caught on camera lighting a gasoline fire just before the deadly Palisades fire burst out. Is arson causing and/or fueling the fiery inferno engulfing L.A.? Unfortunately, the police seem highly apathetic about charging the suspects. Climate Depot reported the findings of a 2021 study: “100% of all [Santa Ana] fires are the result of human ignitions, either intentionally or accidentally,” and “higher temperatures” were not substantially responsible for wildfires.   Horrific Democrat policies — including failure to build new water storage infrastructure, DEI hiring policies, refusal to clear out brush, slashing the firefighting budget, and dumping millions of gallons of water into the ocean to save effectively extinct fish — are to blame, not “climate change.” Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass are the culprits, not your SUV and your gas stove.   And, of course, it seems that arson is at least partially responsible too. Maybe if woke California did not have so many policies that fuel homelessness and crime, that wouldn’t have happened either. There have always been and will always be fires in California, but this one is such a horrific disaster not because the planet is about to go up in flames from “climate change”, but because woke, leftist environmentalists are horrible leaders."

Megyn Kelly blasts 'overweight, out-of-shape' women battling LA fires amid public outcry over response - "Megyn Kelly hit out at the three female leaders of the Los Angeles Fire Department as wildfires continue to devastate Southern California.  Kelly, a former Fox News host, took special aim at Fire Chief Kristin Crowley, Training and Support Bureau Commander Jaime Brown and Deputy Chief in Equity and Human Resources Bureau Kristine Larson amid criticism that the city focused too much on diversity, equity and inclusion efforts to properly prepare forces to battle the fires.  'These three women  who are at the top there are all, I mean honestly, I'm not trying to be mean, but they're obese,' Kelly said on her podcast Monday. 'These are overweight, out of shape women... 'I speak for all women - I believe  speak for all females in Los Angeles - when I say: We want a strong man to rescue us. That's what we want,' she concluded.  'Do we ask for too much?' Kelly's comments came in stark contrast to remarks Larson made in a now-viral video from 2019, in which she insisted residents want to be rescued by someone with whom they identify.  'It gives that person a little bit more ease, knowing that somebody might understand their situation better,' Larson said.  She also seemed to blame helpless fire victims for their need to be rescued as she addressed concerns that female firefighters may not be strong enough to carry a man out of a burning building.  'He got himself in the wrong place if I have to carry him out of a fire,' Larson stunningly claimed. Her comments infuriated many online, as the deadly blazes claimed the lives of at least 24 people and left more than 200,000 residents having to flee their homes.  'Los Angeles Fire Department Assistant Chief #KristineLarson should NOT be in her position if a heavy man is someone she won’t even consider rescuing from a fire,' one California resident posted on X.  'She’s better off working at Walmart or McDonalds.'... the LA Fire Department was left begging the city's council to approve nearly $100million to replace its entire fleet just two months ago.  'Many vehicles have surpasses their expected service life, leading to increased maintenance costs, reduces parts availability and potential downtime,' the department wrote in its request after years of depleted funds... Fire Chief Kristin Crowley wrote in a December memo that the cut of $17.6million 'adversely affected the Department’s ability to maintain core operations, such as technology and communication infrastructure, payroll processing, training, fire prevention, and community education.'  She also noted there was a $7million reduction in overtime pay. Yet a leaked memo last week revealed that Bass demanded the LAFD make an additional $49million budget cut, on top of the $17.6million cut.   The extra cuts, requested just days before fires broke out and devastated swathes of Los Angeles, would have shut down 16 fire stations and crippled the department's ability to respond to emergencies... the larger Los Angeles County has been accused of throwing money at DEI initiatives while cutting its own firefighting budget.   Fox News reported that hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent on initiatives including $14,010 to the Gay Men's Chorus of Los Angeles, $190,000 to the Homeless and HIV needle exchange program, and $100,000 of county funds to pay for Juneteenth celebrations.   But now, AccuWeather - a company that provides data on weather and its impact - estimates that the damage and economic losses from the blazes could be anywhere from $250billion to $275billion, marking the nation's costliest disaster ever."

Meme - "DON'T WoRRY! I'M AN EMERGENCY RESPONDER WHo LooKS LIKE You!"
"HEEEEEEELP! MY HUSBAND'S STILL IN THERE!"
"MY LEG'S BRoKEN! I CAN'T GET UP!"
"LooKS LIKE HE GOT HIMSELF IN THE WRONG pLace!"

Meme - "They're Saving the Dogs... They're Saving the Cats. They're Saving the Houses Of People Who Live There. 101 Mexican firefighters have come to help Fight the Catastrophic wildfires in Los Angeles"
"That was Hatians"
Left wingers think Mexico and Haiti are the same country, but call other people ignorant

Colin Wright on X - "The problem of DEI in firefighting isn't limited to LA, and should be called out everywhere before disaster strikes.  In Connecticut, a bill was proposed to create "a more diverse [i.e., more female] class" of firefighters by lowering physical standards for women.  Specifically, women would no longer be required to pass "fifty-pound simulated vest test component of the Candidate Physical Ability Test" that men are required to pass. Keep in mind that the basic gear firefighters are expected to wear when fighting fires is at least 59lbs.  The last update on the bill's status was that it had been referred to the state legislature's "Committee on Public Safety" for review. However, there's no information indicating whether it passed or what its current status is."
Clearly, being able to move with a heavy load, carry casualties to safety and break down doors has nothing to do with how good a firefighter someone is - what matters is someone who looks like the people he serves

Nate Hochman on X - "It really is remarkable how quickly the illusions of modern liberalism evaporate, once the social order collapses.  The California fires started on Tuesday. Within literal hours, the looting began. "Groups of men" were pulling up to homes en masse—by the hundreds, according to some eyewitnesses—in cars and scooters, across Los Angeles. Wherever the fires burned, they appeared.  This was their first instinct—their primal reflex—in the Hobbesian state of nature. Others secured the safety of family and friends, helped neighbors evacuate, even volunteered to aid affected communities. But not the looters. The very instant they were no longer constrained by the law, they reverted to violent anarchism.
 Civilization does not live equally within everyone. For some, it's an external imposition. It's only the threat of brute force—the state's "monopoly on the legitimate use of violence"—that keeps them within the confines of the social contract. Once that's lifted, these distinctions are immediately laid bare.  The truth is that there are simply people who are antisocial by nature, and their capacity for living in an advanced society is made possible only by a vigilant law. This has been true in every place and time, and it remains true today, as uncomfortable as it may be to our modern sensitivities. The tragedy in California is a testament to that.
Liberal anthropology holds the opposite. It's "environmentalist"—not the popular meaning (i.e., caring about climate change), but in the sense of believing that humans are products of their environment, rather than their innate natures. "Born free, but everywhere in chains," etc. But it's simply impossible to blame what's happening in California on "socioeconomic conditions." If these people were driven by material desperation—by a desire for basic security—they would be dashing for the exit, like everyone else. Instead, they went for the flat-screen TVs."

California’s Homeowner Insurance Market Freefall: Regulatory Folly Run Amok - "California’s homeowner insurance market is in the grips of an urgent crisis as major insurers cancel existing policies, refuse to write new policies, and, in some cases, abandon the state’s insurance market entirely.  Insurers’ unsustainable losses are largely due to poor forest management, which has contributed to wildfires that are more severe and destructive than any recorded in California history.  Insurers’ losses have grown exponentially to unsustainable levels. California’s leaders must focus on better forest management and free market solutions to bring insurers back into the state’s market and restore reasonable costs."
From July 2024

Thread by @kimmaicutler on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "Guys.  We — as in Californian voters who voted in 1988 — voted for a system where every time an insurance company wants to raise rates for automobiles or homes, they have to have a public hearing and an elected insurance commissioner has to approve that rate increase.
Even better, the non-profit, Consumer Watchdog, that ran the ballot initiative that voters voted for, wrote in a way that it could earn intervenor fees when it contested rate increases. Before the wildfire crisis, the insurance commissioner job used to be a stepping stone with great name recognition for higher office. But now it’s a political graveyard because no one wants to do the unpopular job of raising homeowners’ insurance premiums.
Lara has stalled on allowing insurance companies to factor in catastrophic modeling and reinsurance rates, which has caused 7 of the 12 top insurance companies to stop issuing new policies in California. Even today, I get emails on local mailing lists from homeowners trying to find coverage after they get non-renewed. As a result, our state plan of last resort, FAIR (which offers barebones fire insurance, meaning homeowners still have to find wraparound coverage for other risks) has tripled in size over the last five years and now has $458B in exposure. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
Over the summer, FAIR testified it only had about $385 million in unreserved funds available to pay claims and $2.5B in reinsurance. But the @sfchronicle today looked at zip codes around the various LA fires and noted it could have up to $24B of exposure. “When the FAIR Plan runs out of money to pay claims, it’s allowed to split its remaining costs amongst all of the licensed insurers in the state, with costs allocated according to each company’s market share.”  This is why insurance companies were non-renewing customers that were living far away from fire zones. It’s because they didn’t want the FAIR exposure.
In July, Lara announced a new plan to handle the FAIR liability.  For the first $1B each of residential and commercial claims, insurers would be required to pay half themselves, with the option of passing on the other half to their customers. How much is this going to cost you?  Consumer Watchdog (LOL, the same group that ran the 1988 initiative) said this summer that a major wildfire could force FAIR to impose a surcharge of $1,000 on insurance policies throughout CA. Multiple wildfires could be $3,700.
But if they don’t allow a surcharge, it’s hard to see how insurance companies would come back to California and we’d become uninsurable, tanking our property values and tax revenues. There’s also a weird alternate universe where Consumer Watchdog (this fucking non-profit) didn’t happen to be on the same August 2023 Southwest flight as some lobbyists, then secretly record their conversation, leak it to Politico and tank this agreement and maybe it would’ve been effective a whole year earlier and prevented more Palisades customer hemorrhaging to FAIR throughout 2024."
Clearly, capitalism has failed, and insurance company CEOs need to be murdered by Luigi Mangione

Laura Powell on X - "Last year, State Farm canceled 1,600 policies in Pacific Palisades because the state would not allow them to raise premiums enough to cover their exposure. The affected homeowners would then likely have to rely on the state-run FAIR Plan, an expensive last-resort insurance program. But the FAIR Plan reportedly only had a surplus of $200 million as of April 2024 and was likely to become insolvent if a catastrophic event occurred.  Governor Newsom goes around posturing about politics instead of trying to solve urgent problems. Our state government takes billions of dollars from hard-working Californians and provides barely anything in return. An unconscionable failure."
Noah Smith 🐇 on X - "Progressives seem to believe that insurance companies are infinite pots of money whose job it is to just cradle everyone in their loving arms and make sure nothing bad ever happens to them, without charging money for that service"

Colin Wright on X - "I don't know if DEI played a causal role in the California fires, but since DEI rejects merit, injecting this ideology into a field where competency is crucial—such as firefighting—leaves it wide open to criticism.  Whenever merit is disregarded, there is no solid defense against accusations that DEI is responsible for a particular failure. In fact, abandoning merit shifts the burden of proof to DEI proponents to demonstrate how their rejection of merit did not contribute to any specific disaster.
If you publicly announce that you're going to start prioritizing race and sex over merit when hiring engineers, and subsequently new bridges start collapsing, those blaming the collapses on this new hiring protocol are under no obligation to prove anything."

Colin Wright on X - "Ken Hale, a retired Cal Fire battalion chief who was chief investigator for Nevada County v. PG&E, explained in a 2019 article how "PG&E is spending millions to convince everyone in California that all these fires are caused by climate change" instead of on "vegetation management and maintenance as required by law to maintain in a safe and reliable power grid."  "Sorry folks, climate change does not start fires. Powerlines in contact with vegetation does. If there is no spark, there is no fire, regardless of the weather," said Hale.  During Hale's investigation, he unearthed emails from PG&E that "straight out said that it was less expensive to pay the fines than to trim the trees." Although this case resulted in over 700 criminal convictions, Hale says "PG&E has not changed much in the last 25 years."
@GavinNewsom  appears to be bought and paid for by @PGE4Me .   h/t @Nopilled16622"
Trust the Experts - unless they hurt the left wing agenda. Companies are greedy and evil, but if they push the left wing agenda they are good

Michael Seifert on X - "It’s amazing that our government will tell you with a straight face that they can’t stop a regional fire, but if you just pay more in taxes, they can change the entire global climate.  It’s even more amazing that anyone believes them."

Meme - "LA County: 72 genders, 0 operational fire hydrants"

Meme - "Climate Change"
"Annual Rainfall Chart. Downtown Los Angeles. Seasons 1877-2024. Dotted red line is average for all seasons. Measurement is in inches. *not much change in distribution since 1957*"

Jennifer Van Laar on X - "🚨 NEW photos from former LAPD West LA Division officer Rusty Redican taken on July 5, 2021 (yes, 3.5 years ago) at 9:15 AM show the Santa Ynez Reservoir. Redican and his partner were told that maintenance was being done at that time. It looks the same as it did in Nov 2024, when we know it was empty #PalisadesFire"
Libs of TikTok on X - "The 117 million gallon Reservoir in the Pacific Palisades has been empty and undergoing “maintenance” for over 3 years with virtually no change. This is the definition of Government incompetence and negligence."
Damn climate change!

Meme - Jarvis @jarvis_best: "A lot of people dunking on Sam for this take but let me explain. The first rule of journalism is that whenever something bad happens, you have to blame the bad thing on the Republican in Closest Proximity (RICP). In the event that you're stuck with a Dem mayor and Dem gov and Dem pres, then there's no one to blame for the bad thing because there is no RICP.   In such cases, you have to pivot to this: imagine how bad things WOULD be if there WAS a Republican around. It's called a Hypothetical Republican in Closest Proximity (HRICP) and it works. They teach this stuff in J school."
Sam Stein @samstein: "The swift devastation of the #PalisadesFire is horrible. And then it dawns on you that Trump, set to take office in 13 days, has threatened publicly to cut wildfire aid to the state."
Readers added context: "Trump said aid would be cut only if leaders neglected proper wildfire prevention. "Billions [are sent to] California for Forest fires that, with proper Forest Management, would never happen...Unless they get their act together... I have ordered FEMA to send no more money.""
Trump was responsible for everything that happened when he was in office, but he is also responsible for everything that's happened since. He will be blamed till the end of time for everything that goes wrong in the US

Meghan Markle spotted at new LA fire relief effort despite being branded a 'disaster tourist' by critics

Friday, January 10, 2025

Links - 10th January 2025 (2 [including 'Expertise'])

Dr Ellie Murray, ScD on X - "I love twitter bc where else can I, an person with two graduate degrees from Harvard in both infectious disease epidemiology and biostatistics, be assured I am wrong about infectious disease epi and statistics by a software engineer who has “read multiple FDA package inserts”"
Benjamin Ryan on X - "have not taken a science class since high school and there is literally a peer-reviewed paper that proved I was the most accurate person tweeting about monkeypox by far, while most of the MDs and PhDs who were tweeting about it were the most inaccurate. Let’s be serious here people: Generally, of course, people with doctorates in scientific topics know more than most people about science. However, it never ceases to astound me how people with such doctorates so often check their education at the door and freely make scientific claims that are wildly inaccurate. All the worse, they cynically hold up their doctorate as a shield against fair and honest criticism of their intellectual folly. This gives scholarship and academia a bad name and it erodes trust in the sciences.  We need such trust. But how can we maintain it when there is so much dishonesty and sometimes outright fraud in the sciences?"
Trust the Experts - even when they are more wrong than non-Experts - because they push the left wing agenda

Meme - Crémieux @cremieuxrecueil: "Among health "experts" who tweeted about Monkeypox, there was a dramatic tendency to get basic facts wrong.  For example, many claimed risk wasn't especially heightened among gay men.  PhDs were among the worst misinformation spreaders."
"Total Number of Tweets by Author Occupation or Degree. Health Care. Health Reporter. PhD, MPH, Other Ed. JD Total. Number of Tweets. Accurate/ Appropriate Inaccurate/ Exaggerated"

Benjamin Ryan on X - "This paper represents one of my proudest accomplishments. I was at home sick from chemo all summer, going to war with the MD/PhD monkeypox misinformation hounds. The reason the health reporters were the most accurate tweeters about mpox on balance was because of me."

Devon Eriksen on X - "They just can't stop, can they?   They are so bloody proud of their degrees that they simply cannot shut the fuck up about them and make a case for their actual point, using the knowledge they are so quick to boast of.   They just stomp their little feet, shake their tiny fists, and demand that you accept their every pronouncement based solely on some sort of obligation to have total faith in the institution which certified them.   These people seem to have all been sick the day their scientific education taught the class what science actually is.
Science is not a religion.  Science is not an institution.  Science is not a profession.  Science is not a body of data.  Science is not a model of the universe.   Science is an algorithm.  Science is a procedure.
And the whole point of this procedure, the whole fucking point of the whole goddamned business, is to produce a result which is indicative, replicable, verifiable, and understandable.   Truth does not come from scientists.   Truth comes from scientific results.   Scientific results come from research.   A scientist is simply a person who is paid to do research.   Their job is not to learn a whole bunch of stuff, and then become the Oracle of Delphi, roaming the landscape making pronouncements from their expertise, which must be regarded as scientific truth.  Only scientific results are indicators of truth.
The opinion of a scientist is not a scientific result.   The opinion of a scientist is a hypothesis.   A hypothesis must be tested in a properly conducted experiment, which must then be independently replicated, to be acceptable as truth.
This also goes for what they call a "scientific consensus", which is just the opinion of a bunch of scientists.  Therefore, if a scientist expects you to accept their pronouncements as truth because their expertise, they are trying to pull a fast one.   The two questions at issue here are:
1. Whether the mRNA covid treatment is safe and non-toxic.
2. Whether the mRNA covid treatment is effective at preventing covid infection.
Ellie has an opinion on this.   That opinion is a hypothesis.   Not a fact.   In order to establish a fact, an experiment would have to be done.  And then the experimental results would  have to be replicated by someone else, somewhere else. And then the experimental results would have to be shown to the public.   And not, say, for example, locked in a airtight vault, guarded by trained attack panthers, for 70 years.   Now, we could spend a lot of time arguing about how meaningful it is, or isn't, that the mRNA treatment was misleadingly called a vaccine, that it was used as a tool of political power, that the same people telling you it was safe and effective made it illegal for you to sue the manufacturers if it wasn't.   But all of that is irrelevant, because none of those arguments are necessary.   The burden of proof is on those who make demands like "take this injection". Therefore the treatment is unsafe until it is proven safe. And the treatment is ineffective until it is proven effective.   And no amount of scientists' opinions will prove that.   Only evidence will prove that.   And if they won't show it to you, it's not evidence. Because the word "evidence" means "that which is seen". So that which is unseen is not evidence.   And if Ellie can get a doctorate from Harvard without understanding the basic nature of how science works, then Harvard doesn't deserve your trust anymore, and there is no Harvard.   Only Zuul."

Bonn! on X - "We are like this because Congress ceded its power to the executive. That’s it. When Congress decides to do its job again, we will all be in a better place."
Wilfred Reilly on X - "This is an extraordinarily key point. The executive branch of the US government began with the bluntly titled Departments of War, Treasury, and State/Peace.  There are now 15 (?) Cabinet-level executive Departments, and hundreds of executive agencies (EPA, FDA, DEA, etc) overseeing things like the "wetlands" at the bottom of your back garden.   Congress, which has 535 members with staffs of 10+, and was supposed to largely run the country, does very little. We should change that."

Eric S. Raymond on X - "Okay, let me tell you how I became persuaded that evolutionary psychology is more than just a collection of just-so stories.  The anthology that launched the field was titled "The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture".  One of the papers in this anthology started from a folk theorem from before evo-psych was a thing. It's the one that goes: androgenized brains are good at 3D kinematics because in hunter-gatherer societies men were selected for the ability to chuck a spears at a mammoth and actually hit it.  The authors of this paper said, OK, you could call this a just-so story. But if we take seriously the idea that sex differentiation could lead to differences in visual processing that are predictable from sex roles in hunter-gatherer societies, then we ought to be able to think of some sort of visual talent that was much more useful for women than for men in the environment of ancestral adaptation. And then we ought to be able to test for that talent and observe that, in fact women average much better at it than men do. It wasn't hard to think up one. Visual memory for fine detail, especially color detail. Because if you're going to feed your kids by gathering berries, you better be able to tell the ripe ones from the unripe ones. Etcetera.  This suggested a test that it turned out had never been done before. Take a large population of men and women, and give them a test for visual detail memory. So they did this.  And it turned out this is something women are on average much, *much* better than men at. The difference in means was not small, it was what-the-fuck large.This is exactly what a generative theory is supposed to do. Not just explain the observations you already have, but generate testable predictions about experiments you haven't done yet.   It is also worthy of some note that another paper in that anthology, on food-sharing strategies in monkey bands, planted in my head the idea that altruistic sharing behaviors can evolve as a hedge against high-variance-gambles.  Some years later this would be one of the key insights that I needed to understand the psychology and economics of open-source development."

I thought it was common sense not to set off fireworks at 3am while people are sleeping. Diwali is becoming Canada’s night of hell. : r/Canada_sub
The only people whose illegal fireworks you're allowed to slam are white people

Why was this post locked for comments? : r/Markham - "Fuck Andrew Keyes..  This is clearly using mental illness to get out of a shit situation and this fuck Andrew is buying into it as a councilor?  Like fuck this guy and the woman who got caught.  They are diminishing people who have actual mental illness."
"Honestly it is difficult to believe someone with a mental illness who just happen to realize its Halloween and is smart enough to target only houses with porch candy and has the self consciousness to flee in a bike.  We cant just have shoplifters and car thieves claiming mental illness when caught."
"I said this on another post but the 5 teens who stole the Ferrari in Markham are going to say they have mental health issues which made them commit the crime?  Mental health issues are a crutch nowadays and anyone who gets caught is now “oh I have mental health issues”  Yeah she’s definitely mentally unstable to take that much candy and lights and if she did 1-2 houses sure maybe we could say it was a one off but to raid 4 houses is a bit much and apparently she did more than 4"
Mental illness is a get out of jail free card for stealing candy and Halloween decorations. Amusingly some people claimed that the fact that she went back the next day to harass her victims shows that she must be mentally ill. Clearly shitty people don't exist.
Oddly, the politicians were covering for her for some reason (and blocking people who called them out).

Why was this post locked for comments? : r/Markham - "Are we supposed to believe every idiot that stole Halloween treats and decorations has a mental disorder?"
"Ive suffered from some debilitating mental health issues in my life, as im sure others have too, but ive never had the urge to ravage an entire neighborhood of Halloween candy."
"The lady is making a mockery of mental illness. If you have seen the videos and haven't come to the same conclusion, then sorry, you can't be helped."

Public statement from the family of the Cornell Halloween incident - Posted by Ward 7 Councillor Juanita Nathan : r/Markham - "Strange seeing politicians get involved with this. Not sure if I’ve ever seen this before."
"Never had any local politicians care for any of my family's grievances in the 30+ years living here"
"Likewise. It does look suspicious. Large donor??"

Meme - "Today my psych professor said, "You'll never truly know someone well enough to marry until you've seen them struggle financially, grieve a lost one, or witness them while they’re sick.” And that just hit really deep."
"Truly amazing advice."
"First date ideas: freeze their assets, kill one of their loved ones, poison their fucking dinner"

Meme - "This is what $195 worth of groceries look like. It's ridiculous *groceries and 7" Cock with Balls*"

Simon Holland on X - "I want my 13 year old to understand how important honesty is but also know that she is 12 when kids eat free."

Meme - "EVER WONDER WHERE PEOPLE GOT THEIR SURNAMES FROM?
Mr. Baker was probably a baker. Mr. Butcher might have been a butcher. And then there's Mr. Dickinson.."

☘️𝕃𝕦𝕔𝕜𝕪 Ƒʉͫcͧкͭιͪηͣ 𝕄𝕔𝔾𝕖𝕖‎ on X - "Subject: Bullying. That kid you just called gay? He likes a dick in his ass. That girl you just called a fatass? Weighs 400 pounds. And counting. That girl you just called a slut? She fucked the entire football team. That man you just called retarded? He repeated 2nd grade 5 times.  And voted for Biden.  Sometimes you're right. 🤷🏻‍♀️"

Meme - "Venom: The Last Dance
39%. 67 Reviews. Tomatometer
Shut it off, sony! Shut it off!
The next one will work, I promise."

American Airlines fined $15,000 after worker was sucked into plane engine - "American Eagle, a subsidiary of American Airlines, is being fined a little more than $15,000 after a fatal accident where a worker was sucked into an aircraft engine at Montgomery Regional Airport in Alabama. Courtney Edwards, 34, was a ground agent who worked for Piedmont Airlines... The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued a preliminary report noting that Edwards failed to comply with multiple instructions to stay back from the airplane before the engines were shut down... The ground crew told investigators that they had two meetings about safety before the plane landed, and all workers knew the engines would remain on until ground power cables were connected since the airplane did not have auxiliary power on board. One worker reported that it was “discussed that the airplane should not be approached” until the airplane’s rotating beacon light shut off, indicating that it was safe to approach. The video pulled by the NTSB showed that “throughout the course of the accident, the airplane’s upper rotating beacon light appeared to be illuminated.”  The NTSB report cites the American Eagle Ground Operations Manual which instructs workers to not approach the front of a running jet engine and to keep a safe distance of at least 15 feet from what is termed the “ingestion zone.” The manual states, “Jet engines spin with powerful speed and are extremely dangerous until spooled down. The area in front of the engine is called the ingestion zone. The ingestion zone for all aircraft types is 15 feet. You must never enter the ingestion zone until the engine has spooled down.”... The Communications Workers of America (CWA) union, of which Edwards was a member, said in a statement that “it is likely that Piedmont will contest the decision, but CWA will continue to fight for Courtney Edwards, her family, and the safety of all airline workers, who should never fear for their lives on the job.” What exactly the union proposes to do fight, however, the CWA bureaucracy did not explain."
If they hadn't let her work because of her dangerous actions, that'd have been racism and the penalty would've been even higher
Naturally, the company is at fault according to the socialists, because idiot workers are never to blame

Rolf Degen on X - "All over the world, people with nice personality traits like it a tad sweeter. https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0092656624000953 Research has shown that a preference for sweet foods is associated with trait agreeableness. For example, in several, but not all studies, people higher in trait agreeableness also score higher in their tendency to prefer sweet foods or sweet tastes in general. These findings suggest that in general, people who are more agreeable also tend to have a higher preference for sweet foods and tastes. We examined the replicability and cross-cultural consistency of this effect in four samples from different countries (China, Germany, Mexico, & the U.S.). We found that agreeableness was significantly and positively correlated with two different measures of sweet taste preferences in all four samples with small effect sizes. The association between agreeableness and the preference for a sweet taste coincides with terms sometimes used to describe kind and nice people as well as people we love in some cultures (e.g., “sweet”, “sweetie”, or “honey”). Therefore, if people understand that sweetness and niceness are linked via metaphor, and people believe they are either nice or like sweet foods, people might seek consistency by viewing the self as one who is nice and likes sweet foods. People may resonate with experiences that “fit” their personalities. The association between agreeableness and a sweet taste preference appears replicable and occurring across cultures at least in the samples studied."
Women like sweet things too, which is telling

Minimal: Taiwan has the world’s only Michelin-starred ice cream shop - "Minimal, in the city of Taichung, is the world’s first and only ice cream establishment to receive a Michelin star...  On the ground floor is a takeaway ice cream shop offering six whimsical flavors that are continuously updated. Recent options include biluochun (a type of green tea) with sugarcane and an herb called Angelica morii, as well as pine needles with Camellia seed oil and green Taiwanese herbs.  The 20-seater restaurant on the second floor serves a seven-course set menu that plays with food at different, mostly sub-zero, temperatures. The structure of the menu changes little throughout the year but the ingredients and themes shift according to seasons...  Despite becoming a connoisseur, Wan says he’s far from picky when it comes to ice cream.  “I still eat ice cream almost every day. Most of the time, I eat really cheap ice treats like qing bing (a retro dessert made of water and banana flavoring served as shaved ice or in popsicle form). They’re a no-brainer for me,” says Wan."

Poilievre slams Remembrance ceremonies hijacked by 'woke' politics - "In Kingston, Ont., a ceremony at the Murney Tower National Historic Site was conducted within view of a line of about a dozen anti-Israel demonstrators holding “Free Palestine” signage. “Against war, fascism, colonialism and imperialism at home & abroad,” read one.  The official City of Toronto ceremony earned condemnation from former top soldier Rick Hillier for opening proceedings with an extended land acknowledgement that included a condemnation of the Atlantic slave trade.  “We are nothing but ‘sheep’ to put up with this condescending lecture at any time, but especially today. A day devoted to those who served and sacrificed to build a country that doesn’t have that,” wrote Hillier in a social media post... Indigenous land acknowledgements are standard protocol at most Canadian civic events, including Remembrance Day ceremonies. The largest ceremony in Calgary, for instance, had emcee Linda Olsen name the constituent First Nations of Treaty 7, whose lands cover most of Southern Alberta.  Where Toronto’s differed is in naming non-Indigenous attendees as “settlers” or “migrants” — and in mentioning slavery. The latter issue being particularly unusual given that all of the soldiers honoured by Remembrance Day fought for a country that had no institutional legacy of slavery. Slavery had been illegal in British North American since 1833 — 34 years before the formation of the Dominion of Canada. In Mississauga, Remembrance Day iconography was also co-opted for a planned public vigil for Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, the central architect of the October 7 massacres in Southern Israel.  Firas Al Najim, head of the group Canadian Defenders 4 Human Rights, covered literature for the vigil with Remembrance Day poppies. And in a video shot in front of a Royal Canadian Legion branch, Al Najim compared remembrance of the terrorist leader (whom he called a “great hero”) to remembrance of fallen Canadian soldiers... This all comes amidst official efforts to remove Christian prayers from official Remembrance Day ceremonies on the grounds that they’re divisive."

YorkU and UTM lecturer shouts “F&*$ you!” to veterans on Remembrance Day - "A York University PhD student and lecturer at York University and formerly at the University of Toronto Mississauga recorded herself shouting “F&$# you” to Canadian veterans during a Remembrance Day procession on Monday.  In a video shared online to her Instagram account, which has since been made private, Aaliya Khan is heard cursing at the procession of fallen Canadian troops. She said, “Oops, this is Nov. 11,” and another person in the vehicle was heard saying, “I know F&%selection% them.” As documented by X user “Leviathan,” Khan’s additional posts include calling Canada an “occupation of Turtle Island” and for an end to the Canadian government.   “It’s Remembrance Day, so I urge you to think about the Canadian military’s historical and ongoing complicity in the genocide and occupation of Turtle Island as well as the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq,” Khan said on her now-deleted account on X. “All empires will fall, including this one inshallah #landback.”  Before Khan deleted her X account, True North’s Harrison Faulkner documented a response from Khan where she doubled down on her hate for Canada’s armed and police forces.  “This is so funny, bro. Who’s keeping tabs on me?” Khan said in the post. “F&$% the military and F$&# the police for real.” Khan also shared posts saying “New York for Hezbollah,” a listed terrorist entity, and quoted the terror group’s recently eliminated leader, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. Nasrallah famously called for Jews to be hunted and killed worldwide.  Khan also posted an image of a Toyota pickup truck that had been customized with a machine gun turret on the back with the caption “for regime changes.”  According to “Stop Antisemitism,” Khan also recently posted “Death to the police” on her now-deleted Instagram page, support for Hamas and Houthis in fighting Israel “by any means necessary.”   Khan’s posts also used symbols associated with the terrorist group Hamas and expressed her love and gratitude for the listed terrorist entity multiple times."

Ontario school played Palestinian protest song as Remembrance Day music - "An Ottawa school played an Arabic-language Palestinian protest song associated with fighting in Gaza as the soundtrack to its Remembrance Day presentation, causing outrage and distress for some students and parents. The song was the sole musical accompaniment to a slide show of Canadian soldiers and words about peace shown at three Remembrance Day ceremonies for different age groups at Sir Robert Borden school on Monday, according to students and parents. The musical selection was distracting and distressing to some in the audience, particularly Jewish students, some of whom complained to the principal afterwards.  Principal Aaron Hobbs defended the selection during one of those meetings, saying it was chosen to bring diversity and inclusion to Remembrance Day that is usually only about “a white guy who has done something related to the military.”  Hours later, after Hobbs had “a closed-door meeting,” staff said when National Post tried to contact him, he sent an email to the school community apologizing.  “It has come to my attention that the inclusion of the song ‘Haza Salam’ in the program caused significant distress to some members of our school community. For this, I would like to offer my apologies,” Hobbs said in the letter... Several parents and students who spoke to National Post said they could hardly believe what song was selected for the school assemblies for students from grade seven to 12.  “It is hard to believe I’m hearing this at an assembly in Canada for Remembrance Day,” said a student who asked their name not be published, not out of fear of the administration but from other students... Several students used a phone app to identify the song and it took them to music platforms featuring artwork of Palestinian protests and additional songs by the artist that seem less focussed on peace, the students said.  The song was Haza Salam by Mahim Ahmed, according to the students.  The title is often translated into English as “This is Peace” and it appears to have been released less than two months after the Oct. 7, 2023, terror attacks on Israel by Hamas... Article content  “There was only one song. There were no other ethnic songs, or other songs, just one. It was played three times,” said a parent of a student at the school who asked not to be named.  “They chose an Arabic song about peace for Gaza as the only song to play for a Remembrance Day service.”... Another parent, who is Jewish, said the song is one in a long line of similar incidents at the school that make Jewish students uncomfortable or fearful. Article content  “No one would allow a song in Hebrew to be played, even if it was called Shalom, at a Canadian Remembrance Day ceremony. It should have been a song in English or French or an Indigenous language. How did Arabic become an official language of Canada? “Something is wrong at the top,” said the parent, who asked not to be named publicly for the sake of their child. Although Hobbs disagreed the song was problematic at a meeting he had with several students, he later changed his message... Lisa MacLeod, member of provincial parliament for the riding of Nepean, where Sir Robert Borden school is just a kilometre down the road from her constituency office, decried the school’s assembly.  She said using the song did not follow the Royal Canadian Legion protocols and was distressing to Jewish students.  MacLeod said she spoke with the school board’s director, Pino Buffone, and “shared my anger, disappointment and, honestly, utter confusion on how Remembrance Day at a school whose namesake was Prime Minister in World War One could get this so wrong.”"

Ottawa principal apologizes for playing Arabic song during Remembrance Day ceremony : r/nottheonion - "Progressives when literally any marginalized group except for Jews are offended by something: "It doesn't matter if the speaker says they did not mean what they said in an offensive way. Marginalized people were offended, therefore it was offensive, period."  Progressives when Jews are offended by something: "It doesn't matter if Jews were offended. The speaker says they did not mean what they said in an offensive way, therefore it was not offensive, period."  The double standard is so fucking disgusting."
Ottawa principal apologizes for playing Arabic song during Remembrance Day ceremony : r/nottheonion - "And then in the next breath they’ll talk about how the Star of David is triggering to Muslims and a hate symbol.  Never mind the Star of David predates the founding of Islam"
"Throwback to the time when leftists held an "intersectional" LGBT march that explicitly encouraged participants to celebrate their "intersectional" identities as marginalized people, and then some Jews showed up and were immediately kicked out for "making other participants" feel unsafe by displaying Jewish symbols.  Chicago gay pride parade expels Star of David flags.  Please note that Palestinians symbols were openly welcomed at this "inclusive" event whereas Jewish symbols were banned."
Ottawa principal apologizes for playing Arabic song during Remembrance Day ceremony : r/nottheonion - "More so than the Principal’s stupid response, or his statement about how Rememberance Day is usually just “white guys that did something”   The most absurd part is the Arab/Muslim organizations that are acting like victims and just incapable of understanding why the ONLY song being played at a Remembrance Day ceremony in Canada being an Arabic song about the Gaza war is inappropriate"
"I mean that's kind of their go-to, no? They start shit, get clapped back then whine and cry they are victimized."
"You forgot the critical step of “accusing Jews of distorting the Holocaust to make themselves the victim”   The hypocrisy truly knows no limits"

Tipped over: social influence “tipping point” theory debunked - "Clive Thompson has been getting some well-deserved attention for his recent Fast Company piece, in which Columbia University sociologist Duncan Watts explodes the hierarchical theory of social influence and trend propagation popularized by Malcolm Gladwell in the bestselling book The Tipping Point.  Gladwell's model, which has itself become something of a cultural epidemic, posits that a few hyperconnected "influentials" are the key to the runaway viral spread of fads, fashions, ideas, and behaviors.  These pivotal individuals, according to Gladwell, determine which trends will wither on the vine and which will "tip," becoming mass phenomena. But Watts, a pioneer in the mathematical modeling of social networks, has tested the "tipping point" hypothesis, both empirically and in computer simulations.  As it turns out, according to Watts, it's just not true.  There are exceptionally well-connected folks out there, but they're so swamped by ordinary individuals that they can't account for genuine cultural cascades, which result not primarily from the activity of social "hubs" kick-starting trends and broadcasting them to the masses, but average Joes and Janes passing them on to other average Joes and Janes.   In a way, the best vindication of Watts' critique is that, despite being "precisely the type of person you'd peg as an Influential," his objections have taken so long to gain traction.  He has, after all, been raising them for quite some time.  When I interviewed Watts back in 2004, he dismissed Gladwell's theory: "We knew 50 years ago that this model was wrong."
Another Malcolm Gladwell myth debunked

Rates of Sexual Offending: Men, Women and Transwomen

Left wingers were very upset about this meme about transwomen's astronomical sexual offending rates because they could not read and/or were upset that reality has a known trainphobic bias:

i/o on X

"Sex offending rate of women: 3 per one million
Sex offending rate of men: 395 per million
Sex offending rates of transwomen: 1,916 per million"

So I decided to do all the calculations to spoonfeed them with all the sources and steps provided, so they would have to find new copes to dismiss this reality.

Written questions and answers - Written questions, answers and statements - UK Parliament

"On current offences, in the men’s estate, there were 87 transgender women with a conviction for at least one sexual offence. In the women’s estate, the number of transgender women with a conviction for at least one sexual offence was fewer than 5"

So this is where the original graphic comes up with the number of 92 incarcerated transwoman sex offenders. If you want to be picky, we can use 0 transgender women with a conviction for at least one sexual offence since "fewer than 5" is imprecise, but that won't change the qualitative findings (I will calculate this as well for pedants)

Now for the denominator.

In the England and Wales Census 2021, there were 48,000 who identified as trans women. So that's where we get 92 out of 48,000. And from there, simple multiplication gets us to 1,916 sex offenders per million transwomen.

If we use the figure of 87 from above, we have 1,812 sex offenders per million transwomen, which isn't appreciably lower in terms of magnitude vs the male and female numbers.

For completeness, I shall show the calculations for men and women too.

If you refer to Prison population: 30 June 2021 (linked from Offender Management statistics quarterly: January to March 2021 - GOV.UK), in Table 1.2b, Prison population under an immediate custodial sentence by offence group, age group and sex, you will see that as of 30 Jun 2021, there were 11,660 males in for seuxal offences, and 119 females (the meme is slightly off, but that doesn't change the qualitative conclusions).

In the 2021 census, there were 30.4 million women and girls in England and Wales, and 29.2 million.

So the female sexual offending rate was 119/30.4 million or 3.9 per million and the male sexual offending rate was 11,660/29.2 million or 399 per million, which is almost the same as the numbers in the meme (the meme maker, who I assume was i/o @eyeslasho, might have been using a different table of column that I was unable to reconcile with my numbers at midnight while I was writing this post, but that is like a rounding error).

Tellingly, in New Zealand, Scotland and Queensland Australia, transwomen are similarly overrepresented in sexual offences.

Of course, the most prolific left winger in that thread had already proclaimed that "politicians" couldn't be trusted when what they said hurt the left wing agenda, so we know he was just trying to troll and piss people off with the common left wing of tactic of demanding a source, then dismissing it when it is inconvenient (all the while claiming other people have failed logic, lying that he checked out the real figures and they didn't match the meme and challenging others to look at the sources for themselves), but for everyone else who wants to know how the numbers above were derived, I hope this helps.

Related, previous work I did on a similar overrepresentation of trans people being rapists compared to the general population: Transgender offending vs victimisation.

Links - 10th January 2025 (1 - Donald Trump)

nature on X - "The risks of a second Trump presidency continue to mount"
Crémieux on X - "Nature still has not learned that endorsing political candidates tangibly harms science as an enterprise while providing them, the public, and their preferred candidates with no benefits whatsoever."
Crémieux on X - "Shortly after Nature did this the first time, Nature Human Behavior published evidence it was a bad idea:"
Crémieux on X - "When Nature endorsed Biden, exposed Trump supporters said they had less trust that Nature was impartial. That's good. When outlets become political, they're indicating they are partial and shouldn't be trusted."
If you don't trust "Science", you're ignorant and should be ignored

Melissa Chen on X - "The press has lost its monopoly on manufacturing reality.   For years we were sold a one-dimensional image of Jared Kushner as this spoilt brat son-in-law of the President, but one long sit down with @lexfridman  revealed an articulate, competent man who pursued his singular task - culminating in the Abraham Accords - with thoughtfulness.   It’s the same with that @JDVance  interview with @joerogan  and when he went on all-in pod with @jason  & @DavidSacks .  The media had painted Vance as a weird and creepy hillbilly poser whose elite credentials betray his tough Appalachian upbringing, and produced reams of race-baiting analysis of his interracial marriage.   With these interviews, he has come off as a clear-thinking, razor-sharp thinker who is a voice for many of the class issues our elites have been so willfully blind to.   Americans no longer are restricted to politically motivated content masquerading as straight factual reporting.   Legacy media is seeing their power slip away and if the blue stack is back in charge, they will try to erode the “alternative” media ecosystem. They’ve already tried with manipulation of Google and YouTube search.   So to all who were saying these were “just podcasters - what do these people actually do?” I hope you recognize the role they’re playing and how the ecosystem they built has an outsized impact on our politics and our democracy."

Democrats Debate Impact Of Donald Trump's Anti-Transgender Attacks On Presidential Race - "Republican ads suggesting Vice President Kamala Harris cared more about promoting transgender rights than boosting the economy likely contributed to Donald Trump’s victory, according to a new survey conducted after Tuesday’s election.  Another poll released this week by a different Democratic firm found, however, that hardly any voters were motivated by opposition to transgender surgeries or what Republicans derisively call “boys in girls sports.”  The conflicting surveys, with clashing but not totally contradictory findings, illustrate the tricky post-election analysis Democrats will need to conduct as they chart a course out of the political wilderness.  On Friday, the Democratic polling firm Blueprint released survey findings that suggest anti-trans ads hurt Harris. Blueprint asked voters to rank 25 statements about why they picked Trump instead of Harris. The two most popular reasons were that inflation was too high under the Biden administration and that too many immigrants illegally crossed the border. The third-most popular statement was that “Kamala Harris is focused more on cultural issues like transgender issues rather than helping the middle class.” Among swing voters who broke for Trump, the “transgender issues” criticism was the most popular reason, Blueprint found... The exit polls from Fox News and the Associated Press, for instance, found voters basically split on banning gender-affirming care for children: 47% supported the idea but 52% opposed it.  A more vaguely-worded question found 54% of voters thought “support for transgender rights in government and society” had gone too far, while 22% thought it was just right and 22% said it had not gone far enough... moderate Democratic lawmakers have already pointed to trans issue as a reason Harris lost.  “I have two little girls, I don’t want them getting run over on a playing field by a male or formerly male athlete, but as a Democrat I’m supposed to be afraid to say that,” Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.) told The New York Times following the election — prompting a rebuke from one of his campaign aides, who resigned in protest.  Rep. Tom Suozzi, a moderate Long Island Democrat who flipped a GOP seat in a February special election, made a similar comment. And Gilberto Hinojosa, chair of the Texas Democratic Party, told KUT, a local Austin, Texas, outlet on Wednesday that Democrats might consider disavowing the use of taxpayer dollars for transition care. His comments prompted immediate criticism from LGBTQ+ groups in Texas, leading him first to apologize and then, on Friday, to resign, though he claimed he was simply making room for a new generation"
Because trans mania was not one of the most important issues to most voters, it means it didn't matter. Brilliant

Democracy nearly dead after US president elected by way of both electoral and popular vote. : r/babylonbee - "Political and historical experts agree. Electing a president by voting is exactly how democracy dies in darkness."

Blue-state governors form ‘non-partisan’ team to battle Trump admin - "Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker and Colorado Governor Jared Polis unveiled a so-called “nonpartisan” state-level initiative designed to strengthen government institutions and defend against "threats to democracy” around a week after President-elect Donald Trump won the 2024 election.   The “nonpartisan” Governors Safeguarding Democracy will be headed by the two Democratic governors. According to its website, the group will "leverage the collective strength, experience, and institutional knowledge in governors' offices across the country to craft laws and policies that protect the rule of law and serve the people of our great states.""
"Democracy" is the left wing agenda. Rule of law is when courts push the left wing agenda, which is why the left was so upset by the Roe v Wade repeal

Erin Adair on X - "The GROWN ADULTS going into absolute hysterics, filming their deranged, paranoia fueled meltdowns, POSTING them, & calling off work today are the same people who think they’re more intelligent than you. In what world should adults who behave this way be calling the shots?"

Trump 2.0 will force us to solve important problems - "Everyone is talking about the serious challenges Donald Trump poses to this country on a host of issues: trade, defence, the border, taxes, foreign policy. But, paradoxically, Trump’s election presents a significant opportunity for Canadians to enhance their prosperity and security by finally dealing with several pressing domestic problems we have been ducking. There is faint hope Justin Trudeau will change his failed policies at this late stage but Pierre Poilievre could seize this historic opportunity when, as seems likely, he becomes prime minister sometime in the next 11 months. A constructive relationship between president and prime minister always helps protect Canada’s national interests, but it seems crucial in this case. Trump does not take kindly to disparagement and he responds positively to friendship and flattery. It’s not always an easy balancing act. Canadians don’t like signs of subservience to the U.S. president. Brian Mulroney’s remarkably productive friendship with Ronald Reagan elicited partisan criticism for the two’s “cloying” rendition of “When Irish Eyes are Smiling” at the Shamrock Summit in Quebec City on St. Patrick’s Day, 1985. On the other hand, it’s not always rocket science. Repeatedly demonizing Poilievre as “Trump-like” would hardly make Canada-U.S. negotiations easier even if Trudeau deludes himself into thinking it could help him win a fourth term in office. Trump is clearly transactional, but it would be a major mistake to think that is all he is. Deeply held principles underlie his policies regarding American exceptionalism, the economy, the border, immigration, crime, the free enterprise system and traditional values. He will always put America first and is suspicious both of foreign commitments of blood and treasure and of friends or opponents taking advantage of his country. He abhors identity politics, DEI and critical race theory, which he believes are socially divisive, denigrate American history and fail basic tests of common sense. He believes climate change initiatives are wasteful and useless and weaken the U.S. in its competition with rivals and foes. Some Trump pressure will actually be in our interests, starting with his insistence that we meet our NATO commitment of spending two per cent of GDP on our military. As a matter of national honour and to protect our sovereignty, we need to stop being a defence free rider. Doing so diminishes our global standing and undermines our security, especially in the Arctic. And we invest so little in our troops we can no longer act a peacekeeper nation, even if that’s how we still think of ourselves. Trump will keep U.S. taxes low and may even lower them further, putting competitive pressure on us. We need to respond by lowering our own personal and corporate taxes. Doing so will enable us to attract and retain capital, which will help with affordability, competitiveness and productivity, whose recent slow growth has GDP per capita deadlining. Trump’s nominee for energy secretary — Chris Wright, a climate skeptic — will further isolate Canada in its climate catastrophism. Wright, who has called net zero a “sinister goal,” was briefly censored by LinkedIn for posting a video in which he said, “There is no climate crisis and we’re not in the midst of an energy transition either.” U.S. policies will favour fracking, abandonment of green subsidies and approval of new resource projects, including Keystone XL. In this radically new environment, we could free ourselves from costly and ineffective climate obsession, create jobs, generate economic growth and the revenue it brings in for social programs, and in partnership with the U.S. enhance our energy security. Trump’s point man on trade, Robert Lighthizer, who negotiated the USMCA, has written of Canada that for years we have “operated a dairy supply chain management program that would make a Soviet commissar blush.” Supply management may be good politics but it is bad policy. It endears you to several thousand Quebec and Ontario dairy farmers but it raises the price of milk, cheese, eggs and poultry, hurting the poor, narrowing consumer choice, preventing farmers from developing export markets and weakening our bargaining power in trade negotiations. We should resist for show, but ultimately yield on this and other irritants. In the negotiations that are coming, we can leverage our oil, gas and minerals, including rare earths, which bring us real strength in the relationship. Our energy wealth enhances American national security because we are politically stable, enable the U.S. to export more of its own oil and gas and help guarantee North American energy self-sufficiency over the longer term. A few final points: We need to secure our border so there is no leakage to the U.S., especially of criminals and terrorists. We are outnumbered by American specialists, so we should bring in expertise as needed. We should make common cause on geopolitical issues and be more consistent and helpful to our allies, the U.S. included. Finally, at all costs, we need to avoid hectoring and virtue-signalling."

Trump biopic star says that other actors have begun to distance themselves from him - "The Apprenctice star, Sebastian Stan, has admitted that other actors have been afraid to do appearances with him as they didn’t want to discuss Donald Trump... “You know, I’ve got to do a lot of great things, and that’s not pointing at anyone specific. It was… we couldn’t get past the publicists or the people representing them, because [they were] too afraid to talk about this movie.” “And it’s like, that’s when I think we lose the situation,” he continued. “Because if it really becomes like that - fear or that discomfort to talk about this - then we’re really going to have a problem.” "For many, the idea that Trump is the same as any one of us is a really difficult thing to deal with at the moment and I understand the emotions are very high, but I think that’s the only way you’re going to grasp this film,” said Stan. “If all it’s saying is you cannot keep casting this person aside, especially after they get the popular vote, should we not give this a closer look and try to understand what it is about this person that’s even driving that?”"

Eva Longoria Is Done Living in Donald Trump’s America
Eva Longoria clarifies reason why she moved out of the United States - "“Will you please let them know I didn’t move out of the United States because of Trump?” Longoria asked Navarro on the podcast. “I’ve been in Europe for almost three years.” She clarified that she left the U.S. because of work, adding: “I didn’t leave because of the political environment. I left because my work took me there.” While the Texas native admitted that living outside the U.S. allows her some distance from “the constant 24-hour news cycle,” she claimed speculation that she had relocated because of American politics was “divisive.”"
Damn fascist, criticising the media!

D.C. residents want Airbnb blackout for Trump inauguration and beg owners not to rent to Republicans - "Some Washington, D.C. residents are taking their Airbnbs off the market for President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration in protest. Residents are calling on Airbnb hosts to either blackout the dates around Trump’s inauguration or increase the prices and donate the proceeds to liberal causes... The blackout will “show Trump supporters who are coming into the DMV that we do not welcome hate, misogyny, or intentions to take over D.C.,” Kane’s letter reads. Kane told the Post she wants to “try to make any kind of difference that we can in the situation we find ourselves in as D.C. residents and just as human beings right now.”"
Clearly, these people are against "hate"

Scott Adams on X - "Lol, I didn't know Trump threatened to reveal the Mexican government's cartel connections unless they do what he wants on the border.  And he threatened massive tariffs.  And he threatened to send in Special Forces to get the cartels.  So...it looks like Mexico is planning to be extra helpful on the border. . . and the Sinaloa Cartel is killing fentanyl makers just to stay off of Trump's bad side.  Was that so hard?"

Marco Rubio on X - "These people that once worked for Trump now call him a fascist because they wanted to land big money from corporate boards, speaking fees and university teaching jobs"

Meme - Biden eating ice cream: "Get the jab or lose your job, Jack!"
Soyjak: "Okay!"
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "We're going to make food healthier."
Soyjak: "NOOOOOOO!!"

Unclear If Angry-Looking Bald Person A Neo-Nazi Or Leftist Woman | Babylon Bee - "At publishing time, scientists had overheard the bald person going on an antisemitic rant that left them no closer to determining if it was a neo-nazi or a Leftist woman."

Meme - "It will affect us all. There will be shortages also."
"Here's a list of prices increasing by 25% as of 1/21/25:
Natural Gas
auto parts
automobiles
fruits, nuts and vegetables
electronics and appliances
oil and gas
medical instruments
plastic and rubber items
cement and lime
lumber
transportation equipment
medications
Cereal, flour, starch, milk preparations and products
furniture
This is just a small list of imports from Canada and Mexico where prices will drastically increase for the consumer. WE TRIED TO TELL YOU....."
Left wingers are economically illiterate. Even assuming that 100% of these goods are imported from Canada and Mexico (even if the US doesn't make any of them, they can be imported from elsewhere), tariffs are not fully reflected in market prices

Meme - Travis Johnson: "NO, WE DON'T PRAY TO ORANGE JESUS IN THIS HOUSE. YES, WE HATE YOU, AND NO, YOU'RE NOT WELCOME AT OUR TABLE DURING THIS THANKSGIVING...OR ANY FAMILY GATHERING EVER AGAIN." Shawn StShawn: "So much love and acceptance! I'm glad my family isn't infested with bitter, angry weirdos like everyone on this Regardless of politics, everyone in my family is welcome and loving, I hope you all get to feel a fraction of the holiday spirit I will be today"
These are the people who claim to be against "hate". As usual the left is projecting

The thing I hate about him the most is he has made me aware of how much I can hate someone. - "The thing I hate about him the most is he has made me aware of how much I can hate someone."
When they proclaim that they are the hateful ones

Newsom Assures Californians They Will Be Safe From All The Trump Administration's Prosperity, Safety, Lower Prices | Babylon Bee - "At publishing time, the governor's office had announced Newsom's plan to declare California a sanctuary state for high taxes, inflation, child mutilation, and unrestrained violent crime."

The Redheaded libertarian on X - "Tulsi: I was placed on a terrorist watch list after endorsing you.
Trump: How would you like to outrank the people who put you there."

Meme - Democratic Donkey shoving Elon Musk: "FUCK OFF!"
Democratic Donkey shoving Tulsi Gabbard: "FUCK OFF!"
Democratic Donkey shoving Robert F Kennedy Jr: "FUCK OFF!"
Democratic Donkey: "WHY ARE YOU GUYS HELPING TRUMP??"

Meme - "r/Feminism"
"Should I divorce my husband before project 2025 gets enacted?
I have been thinking about just divorcing him before the no fault divorce goes through. It’s a scary thought."
"You have some time if anything does happen. But the fact that you're thinking this indicates you're ready to leave. Like they say, the thing you hope for when the coin is in the air is what you really want."
"To be honest I just want to I will still be with him but the climate rm doesn't look good"
Trump Derangement Syndrome has very real costs. But of course left wingers keep fanning the flames of TDS

Alana Mastrangelo on X - "Donald Trump was lifted up by the people against the will of the elites. Kamala Harris was lifted up by the elites against the will of the people. Vote accordingly."
Left wingers still pretend that Trump is somehow representative of the establishment

Meme - Ana Kasparian: "Bush suspended Habeas Corpus for two years. You were his speechwriter."
David Frum @davidfrum: "We are headed toward a US constitutional crisis vastly bigger than Watergate"

Trump Lost Magnet, Youre in a Cult, Funny Political for Car or Fridge, Democrat, Liberal Gifts, Presidential Election Humor, Bumper Sticker
"The left are the ones who disown friends and family members over political opinions but will call the other side a cult even though most cults tell people to not associate with non members"
Left wing projection strikes again

Andrew Sullivan: Questions About Youth Gender Transitions - "Let’s unpack this by comparing it to the last impeachment. Bill Clinton was impeached after a years-long hunt for malfeasance on the charge of lying under oath about an extramarital affair... It’s a little much for Republicans to have insisted on the Clinton impeachment and yet declare this one unworthy to be considered because the offense, while bad, did not rise to the “high crimes and misdemeanors” standard."
From 2019. It's interesting how it's supposed to be hypocrisy that Republicans in the mid 90s and late 10s allegedly had different standards

LD Basler on X - "To all the Democrats in DC who will be getting fired: Learn to code. Isn't that what you told the 11,000 pipeline workers Biden fired on Day 1?"

Opinion | The Legal Battle Against Trump Was a Miserable Failure - The New York Times - "The yearslong effort to vanquish Donald Trump in court was a dismal failure.  For liberals like me, it may be tempting to attribute the collapse of the various cases against him to convenient explanations of process or personnel. The more uncomfortable truth is that our search for political salvation primarily through the law has backfired. To oppose Mr. Trump in his second term, liberals must learn the lesson of this defeat, which is that there is no alternative to persuading our fellow citizens of our beliefs. For decades, liberals have made the mistake of prioritizing legal victories over popular ones. It was a method of prolonging the civil rights movement even after its opponents assembled a majority to halt it... A few victories made it easy for liberals to forget that the law is just another domain of politics where their enemies enjoy power too. They talked of law as a matter of principle, ignoring that their movement had mainly treated it as a weapon for legalistic political change. Legalism’s greatest theorist, Judith Shklar, defined it as the adoption of an ethics of rule-following and defended it as a useful strategy. Along the way, you claim that the rules are on your side and impose them on your political enemies, and sometimes yourself, because the results are good ones. The trouble is that they regularly aren’t. In this election, legalistic tactics contributed to Mr. Trump’s victory, helping to produce the popular majority he had never boasted before. For all of Mr. Trump’s misdeeds, prosecuting them was not worth the cost of restoring him to power... The legalistic resistance was supercharged in May 2017 when Robert Mueller was appointed as special counsel to investigate Russian election interference and Mr. Trump’s “collusion” with it. But when Mr. Mueller’s inconclusive report was released in April 2019, it was an embarrassment to liberals. The politics of law had misdirected their focus for years, and in the process convinced millions of Americans that Mr. Trump’s foes were as prone to conspiratorial thinking as his allies. Cries that Mr. Trump’s opponents were engaged in “lawfare” suddenly gained credibility. That would prove fateful when, after Mr. Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election, culminating in the Jan. 6 attack, criminal cases began to accumulate against him... many liberals, convinced that their causes were righteous, didn’t register the risks of this legalistic strategy, which included being seen by voters as treating the law as politics by other means. The criminal investigations fueled their target’s dominance of the Republican primary race and breathed new life into his campaign fund-raising. The election became something like national jury nullification — after the fact for the New York case, and pre-emptively for the others... Unsurprisingly, legalistic moves produce a struggle for more power over the law. Mr. Trump’s choices for attorney general — first Matt Gaetz, now Pam Bondi — were predictable responses to the protracted attempt to hold him accountable. His rationale for both, as he put it, was ending the weaponization of the Justice Department — the honest response to which is that law has always been a weapon, and what matters is whether it advances just or unjust outcomes on balance... those committed to litigating Mr. Trump’s policies aggressively should keep in mind the risk of producing illiberal and noxious precedents that could last for decades. Such was the risk incurred in the travel ban case as well as the Smith investigation, which has nothing to show for itself except the Supreme Court’s decision granting the president broad immunity from prosecution."

Thread by @DschlopesIsBack on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "The Full Truth About Ray Epps
After his failed defamation suit against Fox News it's now safe to fully expose this man for all that he's done before, on and after January 6th.  🧵 THREAD
"We need to go IN to the Capitol!"  This is a good place to start with Ray Epps. The damning video starts on the night of January 5th, when Epps tries to incite Trump supports to go into the Capitol the next day. They respond by saying "Nooo!!" before chanting "Fed! Fed! Fed!" Next you can see Ray Epps in action on January 6th telling people "we are going to the Capitol, where are problems are." Then you will see him whispering something into the ear of Ryan Samsel right before Samsel and others charge the barrier with Ray Epps right there behind them. The aforementioned Ryan Samsel (who Ray Epps whispered into the ear of in my previous post) has been a political prisoner for years now spending tons of time in solitary confinement and has been beaten and assaulted while in federal prison.
Despite all this, you might find it VERY odd that the ONLY person involved in January 6th that the Left and the mainstream media have staunchly defended is Ray Epps.  They wanted the book thrown at anybody else that was even present at the Capitol that day. I'm even got to the point where 60 Minutes did a fluff piece interview trying to help Ray Epps clear his name from this "conspiracy theory."
Where did these alleged Ray Epps federal agent "conspiracy theories" come from? Well, directly from the FBI themselves.  Early on Epps was put on an FBI watch list before quickly being removed, without explanation. The official FBI Washington Field Office account also made this "Seeking Information" post where Ray Epps can clearly be seen in the yellow square below.  Oddly enough this post is STILL up today as the pinned post for @FBIWFO 🤔
Here was Trump's expected new FBI Director Kash Patel discussing Ray Epps with @Timcast  "Ray Epps was on FBI's most wanted list one day and the next day he was off of the FBI's most wanted list. There are only two ways that happens: You die... or you're an informant."... Now we get to the Jan. 6th Committee and this is where things get even more interesting.  Notice how the shame panel was already "seeking to debunk unfounded theory about F.B.I. role in riot" BEFORE interviewing Epps? Seems just a bit biased...
he January 6th Committee asked Ray Epps about texting his nephew "I was in the front with a few others. I also orchestrated it."  What did Epps mean by this, according to him it was just "helping people get there." 🤡  The Jan. 6th Committee didn't even bother challenging Ray Epps claiming that the video of him the night before on January 5th (see my first post in this thread) was him trying to "deescalate" a group of people.  Imagine watching that video and thinking this is what happened. 🤦‍♂️
Don't worry, hardened marine veteran Ray Epps only wanted to be in the front lines on his way to go into the Capitol because he was... cold. Ray Epps testified to the Jan. 6th Committee that he left the Capitol at 2:12pm but he actually left at 2:54pm.  This is lying under oath, right?
"We're here to storm the Capitol" - Ray Epps  I should have put this earlier in the thread. It's from "The Rest of the Story with Lara Logan: Insurrection vs FedSurrection: Part One." This is a great January 6th documentary by @laralogan... Eventually Ray Epps tried to sue Fox News for defamation. To me, it seems as if this was an attempt to scare people and media outlets from looking into Epps and posting, discussing and writing articles about him.  Every single MSM outlet covered this and many even cheered it on."

Sunday, January 05, 2025

How the grooming gangs scandal was covered up

Amazingly, this is still an issue in 2025:

How the grooming gangs scandal was covered up

Safeguarding minister Jess Phillips’ decision to block a public inquiry into the Oldham grooming gangs seems, from the outside, to be almost inexplicable. Children were raped and abused by gangs of men while the authorities failed to protect them.

A review of the abuse in Oldham was released in 2022, but its terms of reference only stretched from 2011-2014. Survivors from the town said that they wanted a government-led inquiry to cover a longer period, and catch what the previous review had missed. In Jess Phillips’s letter to the council, revealed by GB News, she said she understood the strength of feeling in the town, but thought it best for another local review to take place.

This is a scandal that should be rooted out entirely, and investigated by the full might of the British state. Voices ranging from Elon Musk to Kemi Badenoch have joined the calls for an inquiry. Yet the Government seems curiously reluctant to dig into the failings of officials.

This reluctance is not new. Across the country, in towns and in cities, on our streets and in the state institutions designed to protect the most vulnerable members of our society, authorities deliberately turned a blind eye to horrific abuse of largely white children by gangs of men predominantly of Pakistani heritage.

Over time, details have come to light about abuse in Rotherham, in Telford, in Rochdale and in dozens of other places. But with the stories released in dribs and drabs, and the details so horrific as to be almost unreadable, the full scale of the scandal has still to reach the public.

The following paragraph makes for difficult reading. But you should read it, if you can. It’s drawn from Judge Peter Rook’s 2013 sentencing of Mohammed Karrar in Oxford.

Mohammed prepared his victim “for gang anal rape by using a pump... You subjected her to a gang rape by five or six men. At one point she had four men inside her. A red ball was placed in her mouth to keep her quiet.”

Her story is horrific. It is also far from unique.

Take “Anna”, from Bradford. Vulnerable and in residential care, at the age of 14 had made repeated reports of rape, abuse, and coercion. When she “married” her abuser in a traditional Islamic wedding, her social worker attended the ceremony. The authorities then arranged for her to be fostered by her “husband’s” parents.

In Telford, Lucy Lowe died at 16 alongside her mother and sister when her abuser set fire to her home in 2000. She had given birth to Azhar Ali Mahmood’s child when she was just 14, and was pregnant when she was killed.

Her death was subsequently used to threaten other children. The Telford Inquiry found particularly brutal threats. When one victim aged 12 told her mother, and the mother called the police, “there was about six or seven Asian men who came to my house. They threatened my mum saying they’ll petrol bomb my house if we don’t drop the charges.”

Yet in a pattern that would repeat itself, Telford’s authorities looked the other way. When an independent review was finally published in 2022, it found police officers described parts of the town as a “no-go area”, while witnesses set out multiple allegations of police corruption and favouritism towards the Pakistani community. Regardless of the reason, the inquiry found that “there was a nervousness about race… bordering on a reluctance to investigate crimes committed by what was described as the ‘Asian’ community”.

Similar concerns applied at the council, where anxieties over appearing racist saw safeguarding officers waving away concerns simply because the perpetrators were Asian. It was felt that some suspects were not investigated because it would have been “politically incorrect”.

This is not to say that the council did nothing. Aware that taxi drivers were offering children rides for sex, in 2006 it suspended licensing enforcement for drivers, allowing high risk drivers to continue practicing. As the Telford Inquiry found, this was “borne entirely out of fear of accusations of racism; it was craven”.

And above all, there was the concern over community relations: senior council staff were terrified that the abuse of children “had the potential to start a ‘race riot’”. The result was stasis, despite officials acknowledging in at least one case that abuse by Asian men had gone on for “years and years”.

It had: at least 1,000 girls were abused in the town between 1980 and 2009. Yet even this conservative estimate was disputed by authority figures, with West Mercia police superintendent Tom Harding insisting in 2018 the figure was “sensationalised”. The independent review later found it entirely plausible.

Denial about the extent of the problem is rooted deep in Britain’s political system. At times, it appears that the government’s approach to multiculturalism is not to uphold the law, but instead to minimise the risk of unrest between communities. Confronted with gangs of predominantly Pakistani men targeting predominantly white children, the state knew exactly what to do. For the good of community relations, it had to bury the story.

In Rotherham, a senior police officer told a distressed father that the town “would erupt” if the routine abuse of white children by Pakistani heritage men became public knowledge. One parent concerned about a missing daughter was told by the police that an “older Asian boyfriend” was a “fashion accessory” for girls in the town. The father of a 15-year-old rape victim was told the assault might mean she would “learn her lesson”.

The ordeal had been so brutal that she required surgery.

As the 2014 Jay Inquiry into Rotherham found, children were “doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight”, “threatened with guns”, “witnessed brutally violent rapes and were threatened that they would be the next victim if they told anyone. Girls as young as 11 were raped by large numbers of male perpetrators, one after the other”.

In the same town, a senior police officer allegedly said the abuse had been “going on” for 30 years, adding “with it being Asians, we can’t afford for this to be coming out.

As Louise Casey’s 2015 report on Rotherham Council found, this attitude was widespread. The Pakistani community accounted for around 3 per cent of the town’s population, and the story emerging was clear: Pakistani men were grooming white girls. As a result, one witness said, the council was “terrified of [the impact on] community cohesion”.

Across the town, pressure was put on people to “suppress, keep quiet or cover up” issues around child abuse. A former senior officer told her review that “x didn’t want [the] town to become the child abuse capital of the north. They didn’t want riots.”

Politicians were terrified [of the impact on] community cohesion. This nervousness meant that there was “a sense that it was the Pakistani heritage Councillors who alone ‘dealt’ with that community”, with their having a “disproportionate influence” on the council: as one witness put it, “[my] experience of council as it was and is – Asian men very powerful, and the white British are very mindful of racism and frightened of racism allegations so there is no robust challenge”. Other concerns may have been even more sinister. In 2016, it was reported that a victim of grooming in Rotherham had alleged that she was raped by a town councillor.

As a result of this combination of factors, the council went to great lengths to “cover up information and silence whistle-blowers”. In the words of witnesses, “if you want to keep your job, you keep your head down and your mouth shut”.

This resistance to an obvious truth repeated itself across the country. By 2010, a West Midlands Police report showed that authorities were aware that grooming gangs were approaching children at school gates.

But as the report stated, “the predominant offender profile of Pakistani Muslim males… combined with the predominant victim profile of white females has the potential to cause significant community tensions”. As a result, the report remained unpublished until released in response to Freedom of Information (FOI) requests five years later.

In Manchester, a 2019 report concluded gangs were left to roam the streets in part because officers were told to look elsewhere. One detective constable was quoted by a report as saying “the offending target group were predominantly Asian males and we were told to try and get other ethnicities”.

Central government took a similar view. In 2020, the Home Office refused to release its research into grooming gangs, claiming that it would not be in the “public interest” to do so. When it was finally released, it turned out to be a whitewash: a shoddy construction which appeared to deliberately downplay the clear role ethnicity had played in the phenomenon.

When people did try to raise the issue, they found themselves shouted down. In 2004, a Channel 4 documentary into abuse in Bradford was delayed after police forces warned the evidence of “Asian men targeting young white girls” could inflame racial tensions.

One of the bleakest cover-ups emerged in Rochdale. Fifteen-year-old Victoria Agoglia, a vulnerable child in care, died in 2003 when 50-year-old Mohammed Yaqoob injected her with heroin. In the lead-up to her death, a review published last year found, she had given authorities information that she was “involved in sexual exploitation, alleged rape, and sexual assault requiring medical attention”. None resulted in her rescue. Across the town, girls as young as 12 were being raped by gangs.

When the first convictions in Rochdale were handed down in 2012, the police and Crown Prosecution Service apologised for failing to follow up on appeals for help. As former Labour MP for Keighley Ann Cryer put it, the authorities “were petrified of being called racist and so reverted to the default of political correctness”. As a result, despite a child telling the police she had been raped, and providing DNA evidence, no prosecution was brought.

The sense that authorities believed that a full investigation would be more trouble than it was worth is widespread. Simon Danczuk, the former MP for Rochdale has said “senior Labour politicians” warned him against discussing “the ethnicity of the perpetrators, for fear of losing votes”. Today, dozens of offenders are still believed to be at large in the community.

While fears over racial tensions and political correctness have left the state frequently unwilling to protect victims, the same concerns have seen attackers protected.

As the Jay Inquiry into Rotherham found in 2014, in at least two cases fathers tracked down their daughters and attempted to remove them from the houses where they were being abused.

The police arrested the fathers.

In other cases, child victims were arrested for “drunk and disorderly” behaviour, rather than the adult men they were with. Small wonder that Jay found young people in the town believed police “dared not act against Asian youths for fear of allegations of racism”.

The protection of offenders may have gone further still. In at least one case, when a victim found the courage to go to the police, their abuser appears to have been tipped off. While still in the police station, one child received a text from her abuser informing her that he had her 11-year-old sister, and that it was now “your choice…”. The child chose not to go through with the complaint.

These stories cover only a small number of towns. The broader picture, however, is clear. The consequences are clear, too: no police officer or government employee has ever been imprisoned for their misconduct. Indeed, in Rotherham, the harshest sanctions faced by the police were written warnings.

Even offenders have managed to dodge some of the consequences for their actions. Despite being stripped of British citizenship, the leader of a Rochdale grooming gang still lives among his victims despite being ordered to be deported.

If Britain is to redeem itself for the grooming gang scandal, it needs to understand how it got things so terribly wrong. This begins with the attitude that protecting the image of a successful multicultural society matters more than the actual truth of that multicultural society.

It isn’t hard to see why councils panicked when confronted with the sheer scale of the abuse. As a recent study calculated, one in 73 Muslim men living in Rotherham were prosecuted for their involvement in these gangs from 1997 to 2016. This was an almost unsolvable problem for a society built on liberal principles.

Even now, discussing primarily Pakistani-heritage grooming gangs as primarily Pakistani-heritage grooming gangs causes problems; IPSO waded in to censure Home Secretary Suella Braverman for this claim last year, citing deeply flawed Home Office research in its ruling. Yet if we can’t be honest about the problems we’re facing, we won’t be able to address them.

In the words of Guy Dampier, a researcher at The Legatum Institute think tank: “The rape gangs scandal was a product of multiculturalism, which in practice meant the authorities turning a blind eye because victims were mostly white and their abusers largely ethnically Pakistani.”

Anti-racism charities, pressure groups and left-wing academics all conspired to stifle discussion or lie that it was only a “moral panic”. The result is thousands of abused girls and a scandal which has scarred British politics.”

Fixing this mess starts by uncovering everything. As research by one of us, Charlie Peters, has shown, these gangs have been active in over 50 towns and villages across the UK — and there are no doubt more that we have yet to hear about.

Even as recently as 2021, it emerged that South Yorkshire Police was still failing to record the ethnicity of offenders, with 67 per cent of cases lacking details in Rotherham.

The state must leave no stone unturned in its efforts to root out this evil. As one victim told GB News, “a government inquiry is the only way to hold Oldham Council and Greater Manchester Police accountable for their huge failures that led to hundreds of survivors being mistreated and not listened to. A Telford-style inquiry will give answers to survivors but it won’t give justice to those who deserve it.”

As shadow justice minister Robert Jenrick recently wrote in these pages, “a national inquiry is just the start: we need justice for the victims”. In his words, “this appalling scandal continues today because perpetrators still walk free and the officials who covered it up have been let off. The individuals who turned a blind eye to these crimes – and fed the most vulnerable women to the wolves – should be in jail.”

Reform UK’s Rupert Lowe has called a “full, free and fair public inquiry” that will “show the British people the facts, and let them decide”.

“No stone must be left unturned” in holding the guilty to account, “including those who acted to cover up these atrocities”. For the guilty, Lowe’s prescription is simple: “deportations and prosecutions, lots of them”.

“Any man or woman found to be complicit in these crimes should be deported, including dual nationals who should have their citizenship stripped away. That includes family members who were aware of what their husbands, fathers, sons and brothers were participating in. Swift and brutal justice is required”.

And above all, concerns over multiculturalism must no longer be allowed to outweigh the need to keep the public safe. As Dampier points out, we “need an end to two-tier community relations and the application of the law equally to all”.

Robert Jenrick agrees: “to sustain order in multicultural Britain, the state considered it necessary to apply the law selectively. For decades the most appalling crimes from diaspora groups were legalised and actively covered up to prevent disorder. The rule of law was abandoned to sustain the myth that diversity is our strength, destroying the lives of thousands of working class white girls in the process. This scandal starts with the onset of mass migration. This appalling affair is the final nail in the coffin for liberals who cling to the argument that Britain is an integration success story. Mass migration must end immediately and the foreign nationals prosecuted for their monstrous crimes must be deported - no ifs, no buts”.

It may sound strong. But strong measures are required. The British state’s soft touch approach left this problem to fester and rot.

Children were abandoned to suffer in the name of community relations, an unforgivable price. And it was a price that brought nothing: harmony based on lies doesn’t last. Public fury is swelling, and there is more to be angry about than if the cases had been dealt with swiftly at the time. Indeed, abuse may still be taking place because the state failed to act properly before.

It’s time for a new approach. The truth must be brought to the light.

 


One claim is that the UK doesn't really have two-tier policing but that policing has collapsed and that the police just pick low hanging fruit, for example where people post material online, thus providing the material they can be prosecuted on.

But clearly, there is pressure to prosecute certain crimes and not others, as even when there is lots of evidence, certain crimes are not prosecuted due to the left wing agenda. 

 

Many years ago, someone claimed that most sexual abuse of children was by white people, so there was no reason to be concerned about migrant grooming gangs. Presumably a lot more than 1 in 73 white men are sexual abusers, for this claim to be true.

Ironically, we are told that in the US police misconduct is appalling because the state is supposed to protect people, so even though US police misconduct is rare, it deserves disproportionate attention. But of course institutional coverup of grooming gangs is good, because of racism.


This is why left wingers hate the Telegraph so much.

Political correctness and wokeness literally kill.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Latest posts (which you might not see on this page)

powered by Blogger | WordPress by Newwpthemes