Youngkin Makes the GOP the Parents’ Party - WSJ - "While governors don’t directly set curriculum, Mr. Youngkin can empower parents like Ms. Mierzejewski by reforming the state’s Education Department. Mr. McAuliffe insisted that critical race theory wasn’t being taught in schools, even though the department during his governorship (2014-18) encouraged school districts to “embrace critical race theory.” Virginia’s current governor, Democrat Ralph Northam, said that “critical race theory is a dog whistle that Republicans are using to frighten people” even as his Education Department hosted an “equity” speaker who has declared that white teachers are “spirit murdering Black and Brown children” and called for them to undergo therapy for “White emotionalities.” Mr. Youngkin could take a stand on behalf of parents against this systemic gaslighting by launching a blue-ribbon commission to evaluate how CRT has affected state policy and school curriculum, as well as by having the Education Department jettison CRT and encourage schools to refocus on the basics. Mr. Youngkin should also champion “academic transparency,” a proposal gaining traction across America. Parents in Virginia should never be asked, as parents in Loudoun County were, to sign nondisclosure agreements before being permitted to review school curriculum. That information should be made readily available to parents online. When it comes to particularly controversial curriculums involving race, sex and gender, Mr. Youngkin could take inspiration from Ohio’s Parents Right to Know Act by requiring full parental curricular review and opt-in—rather than merely the traditional notice for opt-out. Mr. Youngkin’s campaign caught fire after the revelation that a male student who sexually assaulted a young women in a girls bathroom had been transferred to a new school, where he allegedly assaulted another young woman. The Loudoun school superintendent at first publicly denied that an assault had occurred. Follow-up reporting by the Daily Wire website demonstrated that the school district failed to report past instances of sexual assault to the state Education Department"
Virginia Little League coaches required to undergo anti-racist training to combat 'institutional racism' - "Alexandria Little League board president Sherry Reilly announced the league’s partnership with the Positive Coaching Alliance and instructed coaches to cancel practices on May 24 in order to attend a “Sports Can Battle Racism” workshop"
Children aged seven to be taught that they are not ‘racially innocent’ - "Children as young as seven are to be told they are not "racially innocent" because they view "white at the top of the hierarchy" as part of diversity training for teachers. Brighton and Hove City Council has been accused of "indoctrinating" children through its five-year plan for an anti-racist education system, which endorses critical race theory and white privilege – contentious ideologies that have sparked protests... Kemi Badenoch, the equalities minister, has previously told the Commons that schools teaching white privilege as an uncontested fact are breaking the law... The council has faced criticism from councillors for failing to disclose the contents of the training since it was approved in November 2020... a report by the Government's Race Equality Commission described the concepts of white privilege and white fragility as "counterproductive and divisive", while the Commons education committee said it may harm white working class pupils' progress."
Christian Schools See Growing Enrollments as Public Schools Decline - "NPR described as “troubling” the fact that public school districts are shedding students... In April, the U.S. Census Bureau found 11.1 percent of K-12 students in the nation are now homeschooling. That statistic represents a significant jump from the 5.4 percent who began homeschooling when schools closed throughout the country in the spring of 2020, and from the 3.3 percent who homeschooled prior to the pandemic. Of particular note in the Census Bureau data is that homeschooling is surging among black families. The proportion of these families who have chosen homeschooling increased from 3.3 percent in spring 2020 to 16.1 percent in fall 2020."
Tennessee mom says parents asked to sign 'ridiculous' waiver they will not eavesdrop on kids' online lessons - "A Tennessee school district is under fire for asking parents to sign a form agreeing not to eavesdrop on kids' virtual classes over concerns they could overhear confidential information. After significant pushback, Rutherford County Schools is allowing parents to tune in with permission from the teacher but they can't record the classes... "What are they trying to hide? What is the problem? Why won't they let us sit in?" the homeschool mom of five asked. "Obviously, because they are teaching our children propaganda that they should not be teaching"... Cardoza-Moore said this is because teachers are pushing "social justice" instead of reading, writing and math, and they don't want to be held accountable to the parents"
I wonder what teachers are trying to hide. This is absolutely not proof that teachers are trying to brainwash their students
Elizabeth on Twitter - "There is nothing happening in the public schools today that was not happening 20yrs ago. They are just bolder today and no longer hiding. Many who saw it 20yrs ago and chose to homeschool were called extremist and over-protective parents. Sad to say, it won't get better."
More Black Families Are Choosing to Homeschool - "Ama Mazama, an African American studies professor at Temple University in Philadelphia, has written extensively about homeschooling and dubs the rise in black homeschooling families “racial protectionism.†It’s no secret that the vast majority of black students attend schools that do not adequately educate them. A 2012 Center for American Progress report reveals, “A 10% point increase in students of color at a school correlates with a $75 per pupil decrease in funding,†according to the Christian Science Monitor. Minority schools also get the most inexperienced teachers."
Is banning homeschooling racist?
Liberals only cry "correlation isn't causation" when they don't like the results
Harvard Professor Wants A ‘Presumptive Ban‘ On Homeschooling, Claims It Promotes White Supremacy - "a professor of law and director of Harvard Law School’s child advocacy legal clinic, claims homeschooling is a threat to children’s rights, a method of promoting white supremacy, and a drain on democratic society — and even goes so far as to suggest a national “presumptive ban” on the practice... The summit brings together a number of “experts” from across the spectrum to discuss the “problems of educational deprivation and child maltreatment that too often occur under the guise of homeschooling, in a legal environment of minimal or no oversight.” Prof. Elizabeth Bartholet is leading the charge against those who actively resist public schools and she believes that the generation currently being homeschooled is an eventual, if not active, breeding ground for racism, sexism, and isolationism. “Many homeschool precisely because they want to isolate their children from ideas and values central to public education and to our democracy. Many promote racial segregation and female subservience. Many question science. Many are determined to keep their children from exposure to views that might enable autonomous choice about their future lives”... “Homeschooling, she says, not only violates children’s right to a ‘meaningful education’ and their right to be protected from potential child abuse, but may keep them from contributing positively to a democratic society”... Worse still, Bartholet seems to argue, it’s possible these homeschoolers are…religious... The central argument seems to be that children should be wards of the state, and that the state — not individual parents — should be charged with deciding what is best."
Liberals claim parents/normal people don't have a right to object to what is taught in schools, and if they don't like it they should homeschool or they are hypocrites. Besides them getting very upset when I say then they shouldn't complain about creationism being taught in science class, most of them already hate homeschooling anyway and want to ban it (precisely because homeschooling is mostly outside their control)
Harvard Law Prof Calls for Ban on Homeschooling, Saying It's 'Dangerous' to Leave Children with Their Parents 24/7 - "The article by Erin O’Donnell, headlined “The Risks of Homeschooling,” sets up one straw man after another to make the case that the government must step in to protect children from their own parents—who are presumed guilty and ill-qualified to care for their own offspring. Elizabeth Bartholet, faculty director of Harvard Law School’s Child Advocacy Program, told the magazine that homeschooling deprives children of their right to a “meaningful education.” She cites no law that requires a child to receive a “meaningful” education (because there is no such law in the U.S.) but defines it thusly: “But it’s also important that children grow up exposed to community values, social values, democratic values, ideas about nondiscrimination and tolerance of other people’s viewpoints.” (Nothing about reading, writing, and ‘rithmetic in her formula, it must be noted.)... “I think an overwhelming majority of legislators and American people, if they looked at the situation,” Bartholet says, “would conclude that something ought to be done.” This, despite the fact that homeschoolers:
Typically score 15 to 30 percentile points above public-school students on standardized academic achievement tests
Score above average on achievement tests regardless of their parents’ level of formal education or their family’s household income
Typically score above average on the SAT and ACT tests
Typically score above average, on measures of social, emotional, and psychological development including peer interaction, self-concept, leadership skills, family cohesion, participation in community service, and self-esteem
Go to and succeed at college at an equal or higher rate than the general population
Participate in local community service more frequently than does the general population, vote and attend public meetings more frequently than the general population
Internalize the values and beliefs of their parents at a high rate
That last one, by the way, is what the moral revolutionaries in the education establishment fear most. Bartholet laments in the Harvard Magazine article that some homeschoolers are “extreme religious ideologues.” Bartholet claimed in a recent Arizona Law Review paper that “Many homeschool because they want to isolate their children from ideas and values central to our democracy, determined to keep their children from exposure to views that might enable autonomous choice about their future lives.” Make no mistake: by “values central to our democracy” she means her enlightened (ahem) values. If your family’s values come into conflict with hers, Bartholet’s must prevail.""
5 Things I Learned Debating the Harvard Prof Who Called for a "Presumptive Ban" on Homeschooling - "1. There Are People Who Believe the State Should Be Your Co-Parent...
Professor Bartholet makes it clear that she is seeking a reinterpretation of the US Constitution, which she calls “outdated and inadequate,” to move from its existing focus on negative rights, or individuals being free from state intervention, to positive rights where the state takes a much more active role in citizens’ lives. During Monday’s discussion, Professor Bartholet explained that “some parents can’t be trusted to not abuse and neglect their children,” and that is why “kids are going to be way better off if both parent and state are involved.” She said her argument focuses on “the state having the right to assert the rights of the child to both education and protection.” Finally, Professor Bartholet said that it’s important to “have the state have some say in protecting children and in trying to raise them so that the children have a decent chance at a future and also are likely to participate in some positive, meaningful ways in the larger society.” It’s true that the state has a role in protecting children from harm, but does it really have a role in “trying to raise them”? And if the state does have a role in raising children to be competent adults, then the fact that two-thirds of US schoolchildren are not reading proficiently, and more than three-quarters are not proficient in civics, should cause us to be skeptical about the state’s ability to ensure competence. I made the point on Monday that we already have an established government system to protect children from abuse and neglect. The mission of Child Protective Services (CPS) is to investigate suspected child abuse and punish perpetrators... this argument for more state involvement in the lives of homeschoolers ignores the fact that children are routinely abused in government schools by government educators, as well as by school peers. If the government can’t even protect children enrolled in its own heavily regulated and surveilled schools, then how can it possibly argue for the right to regulate and monitor those families who opt out?
2. Random Home Visits Will Be a Weapon of the State...
minority families are increasingly choosing homeschooling to escape discrimination and an inadequate academic environment in local schools... “To state that they want to have surveillance into our homes by having government officials visit, and have parents show proof of their qualified experience to be a parent to their own child is yet another way for local and federal government to do what they have done to native Americans, blacks, the Japanese, Hispanics, etc in the past. Her proposal would once again interfere and hinder a certain population from progressing forward.”...
3. Private Education Is in Danger
Despite the landmark 1925 US Supreme Court decision that ruled it unconstitutional to ban private schools, there remains lingering support for limiting or abolishing private education and forcing all children to attend government schools. Homeschooling is just one form of private education."
Michigan Democratic Party deletes post questioning parents' role in schools - "The Michigan Democratic Party has deleted a weekend Facebook post that questioned the role parents have in deciding what is taught in public schools and drew criticism from conservative and school choice groups. The Democratic Party post, which appeared to be a screenshot, indicated the purpose of public education was to teach students "what society needs them to know." And parents who want more input on what their kids are learning, the post said, "have the option to choose to send their kids to a hand-selected private school at their own expense." "The client of the public school is not the parent, but the entire community, the public"... "Parents need to have a say in their children’s education, end of story," the Democratic Party said Monday. "The post does not reflect the views of Michigan Democrats and should not be misinterpreted as a statement of support from our elected officials or candidates." Republicans blasted the message over the weekend, noting that Michigan's revised school code said determining and directing the education and teaching of a child is the "natural fundamental right of parents and legal guardians."... “The party’s classist attack on low-income and other parents is absolutely astonishing — and very telling. Public school is about kids, not Democrats’ political policy agenda"... Republican former state Rep. Gary Glenn of Midland pointed to the success of Republican Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, who flipped Virginia's Democratic leadership on promises to restores parents' right to have a say in curriculum. "Thank you to the MI Democratic Party," Glenn wrote on Facebook. "Doubling down despite what happened in Virginia gov's race, the gift that keeps on giving." GOP state Sen. Lana Theis used the post in a fundraising email for her re-election campaign, calling the post a "shut-up-and-sit-down" message to Michigan families. "This is what I'm up against in Lansing," said Theis, R-Brighton. "Teacher unions, government bureaucrats, and tyrants who make up the rules as they go along and tell us to keep quiet and let it happen.""
Apparently parents are not part of the entire community or the public. It's only liberal activists who get to define what the public wants
I saw someone who claimed they only deleted it because of backlash, and that it wasn't wrong - even though the national party also disavowed it
California Ethnic Studies Advisor To Teachers: Be ‘Extra Careful’ About Parents Seeing ‘What Materials Are Being Used’ - "In his presentation, Pacheco claimed that the district’s guidelines and expectations were considered “barriers” to ethnic studies. He also encouraged teachers to be careful about what they say in virtual classrooms as parents are considered barriers as well... According to the presentation materials, Pacheco pushed ethnic studies seemingly to indoctrinate children and lead them to activism. “The kids become a subject and you are intending to awaken them to the oppression that they aren’t aware of but that they are actively participating in,” Pacheco wrote. “Then how to lead to social change.” Teachers were also encouraged to read “Pedagogy of the Oppressed” by Paulo Freire, which argues that oppressed people can only regain humanity by fighting for liberation with other oppressed people. The book was initially written for oppressed people living in Brazil in 1968, though American education institutions have reconstructed the lessons to fit the current racial climate."
When you know you have something to hide
The Causal Effects of Cultural Relevance: Evidence From an Ethnic Studies Curriculum - "An extensive theoretical and qualitative literature stresses the promise of instructional practices and content aligned with minority students’ experiences. Ethnic studies courses provide an example of such “culturally relevant pedagogy” (CRP). Despite theoretical support, quantitative evidence on the effectiveness of these courses is limited. We estimate the causal effects of an ethnic studies curriculum, using a “fuzzy” regression discontinuity design based on the fact that several schools assigned students with eighth-grade GPAs below a threshold to take the course. Assignment to this course increased ninth-grade attendance by 21 percentage points, GPA by 1.4 grade points, and credits earned by 23. These surprisingly large effects suggest that CRP, when implemented in a high-fidelity context, can provide effective support to at-risk students."
New ethnic studies requirements mean more lessons on race in Boston classrooms - The Boston Globe - "On this tightrope walk of teaching today — especially teaching about racism — Ko says he is aware of the dynamics at play in American education. “I’m very conscious about allegations of brainwashing and indoctrinating students,” he tells me. At Washington High, the school’s principal, John Schlauraff, Ko, and the social studies department head jointly conduct interviews for ethnic studies teaching candidates, screening them carefully. “Is this teacher going to project their views on the students, which is not our goal?” Schlauraff explains. “Our goal is to have students become responsible, participating citizens who can make up their own minds.”"
Most parents don't disapprove of what schools are teaching, poll finds - "76% of respondents agree that "my child's school does a good job keeping me informed about the curriculum, including potentially controversial topics." "It really is a pretty vocal minority that is hyper-focused on parental rights and decisions around curriculum," observes Mallory Newall of Ipsos, which conducted the poll. Just 18% of parents say their child's school taught about gender and sexuality in a way that clashed with their family's values; just 19% say the same about race and racism; and just 14% feel that way about U.S. history"
Of course, if most parents are not concerned about Intelligent Design appearing in science class, that will just mean that they are ignorant
Apparently if 18% of schools are trying to groom kids, that is nothing to worry about - one only has to worry if 51% of schools are doing it (but then the narrative will change to 51% of parents being taken in by "far right" "propaganda". And of course, a majority of white Americans saying whites face discrimination means they're deluded
Why Is Wokeness Winning? - "A question I’ve wrestled with this past year or so is a pretty basic one: if critical race/gender/queer theory is unfalsifiable postmodern claptrap, as I have long contended, how has it conquered so many institutions so swiftly? It’s been a staggering achievement, when you come to think of it. Critical theory was once an esoteric academic pursuit. Now it has become the core, underlying philosophy of the majority of American cultural institutions, universities, media, corporations, liberal churches, NGOs, philanthropies, and, of course, mainstream journalism. This summer felt like a psychic break from old-school liberalism, a moment when a big part of the American elite just decided to junk the principles that have long defined American democratic life, and embrace what Bari Weiss calls “a mixture of postmodernism, postcolonialism, identity politics, neo-Marxism, critical race theory, intersectionality, and the therapeutic mentality.”... The first, it seems to me, is emotional. The reason so many people marched this summer was because of a righteous revulsion at the visceral image of a black man being murdered slowly on the street by a bad, white cop... BLM’s critical race activists do not support reforming the police, they want to abolish them entirely. In fact, they demonize all cops as “bastards”, and they justify violence and exonerate crime as legitimate resistance to the far greater crime of white oppression. Liberals, concerned about resilient racial inequality, have simply decided to ignore this. Or they think that a little radicalism is no bad thing in a polarized time: the usual “no enemies to the left” mantra in the era of Trump and white nationalism. I can see why people take this path of least resistance, but what we’ve seen is simple avoidance of the deeper issue of CRT’s profound illiberalism, a dismissal of it, or an anti-anti-woke position that sees opponents as mere hysterics (and maybe racists). And the CRT advocates have brilliantly managed to construct a crude moral binary to pressure liberals into submission. Where liberalism allows neutrality or doubt or indifference, CRT demands an absolute and immediate choice between racism and anti-racism (defined by CRT) — and no one wants to be a racist, do they? Legitimate anguish about racial inequality and the sheer terror of being publicly labeled a bigot have led liberals to surrender their core values to the far left. The second reason for CRT’s triumph is that it’s super-easy. Social inequalities are extremely complicated things... Then there’s the deep relationship between CRT and one of the most powerful human drives: tribalism. What antiracism brilliantly does is adopt all the instincts of racism and sexism — seeing someone and instantly judging them by the color of their skin, or sex — and drape them with a veil of virtue... Social aspiration also plays a part. The etiquette of wokery is increasingly indispensable for high society... Rob Henderson argues that this aspiration to be in the upper classes helps explain why Asian-Americans, who are targeted for direct race discrimination under CRT, nonetheless often support it... There’s little doubt, either, it seems to me that there is a religious component to wokeness... But what also make CRT so successful is ruthlessness... In the past, a new set of ideas could be engaged in a clash of argument and debate. But you’ll notice that the advocates of what Wes Yang has called “the successor ideology” never debate any serious opponents of their position. This is because debate in a liberal society implies equal standing for both sides, and uses reason to determine who’s right or wrong. But there can be no “both sides” within CRT, no equation of “racists” and “antiracists”, and debates are inherently oppressive. Logic, evidence, and reason are, in this worldview, mere products of white supremacy, forms of violence against the oppressed. In CRT, remember, there is no truth or objectivity; there are merely narratives. So, yes, 2 + 2 = 5, and math is inherently a function of whiteness. And what racist is going to deny this?"
Black Democrats Walk Out of Mississippi Senate Over Bill Curbing CRT - "All 14 black Democrat senators walked out of the Mississippi Senate Chamber on Friday in protest before a vote on a bill that prohibits teaching children any race is superior or inferior to another."
Diversity and inclusion are bad for people’s health - "The American Medical Association is the most well-known professional physicians’ organization, wielding enormous influence nominally on behalf of all doctors (although fewer MDs belong to the AMA than might be assumed). In 2019, the AMA established the Center for Health Equity, whose mission statement reads, “The AMA Center for Health Equity works to embed health equity across the AMA organization so that health equity becomes part of the practice, process, action, innovation, and organizational performance and outcomes.” Hey, the AMA heard you liked health equity, so they’re going to put more health equity in your health equity. What does this mean for patients? It’s hard to say, exactly, but it certainly sounds health equity. The American Association of Medical Colleges is a nonprofit organization that represents academic medical institutions and oversees the Medical College Admissions Test as well as the application services for both medical schools and residency programs. In contrast to the AMA’s Center for Health Equity, the AAMC has a Center for Health Justice, but don’t worry: it, too, assures us that it’s working “to make progress towards health equity.” Together with the AMA, the AAMC sponsors the Liaison Committee on Medical Education, which accredits all programs that can grant a medical degree in the United States. In short, these organizations decide who will become a doctor. Historically, this process is extremely competitive, and only those students with the best grades and the highest MCAT scores were accepted. But according to these organizations now, “merit” isn’t all it’s cracked up to be... we’re warned that “Narratives that uncritically center meritocracy and individualism render invisible the very real constraints generated and reinforced by poverty, discrimination and ultimately exclusion.” It’s difficult to glean any concrete meaning from such a muddied morass of verbiage, but “meritocracy” doesn’t seem to be very well liked. Reading on, every square in the social justice bingo card is filled: “critical race theory” is praised; “diabetic” is replaced with “person with diabetes,” as if this will lower any blood glucose levels; the biologically-nonsensical notion of “gender ideology” is affirmed; words like “blacklist” and “blackmail” are condemned as representative of “white privilege.” This sort of Orwellian silliness might be expected (but not encouraged) from a progressive college’s social studies department, but from medical organizations, it represents a serious concern for future patient safety... Imagine that this ideology does manage to redefine medicine in the view of the general public. Every woman and non-white physician will be viewed with an asterisk, and every white male will be assumed to be exemplary, else he would never have made it past the diversity quotas."
'Our constitution should be burned': What critical race theorists really think of America - ""The reason I say white folks and people who happen to be white is because anyone that is born in the world, because whiteness is global, can absolutely abide by tenets of whiteness. This is why we have Candace Owens," Doran says, listing off other black people she disagrees with. "This is why we have black folks who will say critical race theory is trash, because there is trauma rooted in that for marginalized folks, that means they try to increase their proximity to those ideals and those policies and those institutions for safeness. "But at the end of the day, people who are phenotypically white have a choice. They can—because we're all indoctrinated into whitenesS—they can choose to uphold the system that was built for and by them on our backs, those are white people."... "Whiteness is a construct that was 1000 percent created under Prince Philip's guidance at the birth of the enslavement of black Africans and the human trafficking of black Africans for the purpose of increasing wealth for Portugal, because they could no longer tax their people. That was very intentionally fabricated, through pseudoscience, through religious—religion, and through history, right? "So we cannot say it's a theory when we have so much empirical and historical evidence to tell us that these things are in fact real and true," Doran said... "While one could say that very little was accomplished, or that this wasn't productive, this is a rare and very clear example of what CRT looks like in practice- conversation, the classroom, etc."
Children as young as three months old may be racially biased, council claims - "Children as young as three months old may be racially biased, a major London council has claimed, as parents raise alarm at “activist educators” in the nursery sector. A poster shared by Islington Council’s under-fives department included diagrams of babies each year through to age six, titled: “Children are never too young to talk about race”... It was shared on the Islington Early Years Twitter account late last year. It is sourced from a radical US website called the Children’s Community School and cites a series of contested studies, most from before 2010, for each of the six claims about children and race... Parents have raised alarm at the latest revelation after The Telegraph recently reported how at least four Labour-run councils have drafted in “Maoist” diversity consultants to “decolonise the mindsets” of nursery staff working with toddlers. Nottingham City Council, the Welsh Government, Islington Council and Early Years Bristol have worked with The Black Nursery Manager, a diversity consultancy which criticised “the violence of whiteness” and claimed the Government is an “agent of white supremacy”. MPs told The Telegraph the training must be investigated as “the most poisonous and divisive kind of dogma”, prompting the Early Years Alliance to hit back and say critics were “incredibly short-sighted”, while the National Day Nurseries Association said such training “should be encouraged not criticised”. But campaigners say the angry backlash from the early years bodies shows how entrenched radical race theories have become in nurseries, with many rejecting the “colour-blind” idea of meritocracy because it refuses to focus on differences between races. Hitting out at “activist educators”, parent Adrian Hart, from the campaign group Don’t Divide Us, said: “Fundamentally, many of the studies presented in support of these sorts of ideas about children and race simply conflate acceptance of one group with rejection of another.” “Children's choices in relation to things like doll or toy preference, in artificial experimental conditions offer no indication of whether the child takes account of race in every day social interactions,” the author of The Myth of Racist Kids added."
Indoctrination is a myth
Jim Crow at Madison West high school - "West High School Principal Karen Boran apologized on behalf of West High School for an e-mail to parents that segregated white Zoom sessions from one for persons of color." But nowadays it's normal
BREAKING: Woke educators SUED over surveillance dossier on Scottsdale parents concerned about mandates, CRT - "Harmeet Dhillon announced that a lawsuit has been brought against the Scottsdale Unified School District and others within the district that spied on and created a dossier regarding parents that advocated for in-person learning and transparency... Mark Greenberg "had amassed a comprehensive dossier on Amanda, Kim, Edmond, and many other parents, collecting pictures of children, homes, and cars; background checks; court records; business records; mortgage and credit documents; and much more"... "The Greenburgs made strategic use of the dossier Mark maintained in order bully critics into silence. SUSD itself took steps to silence critics, even hiring outside legal counsel to send a cease and desist letter to a parent group that included 'SUSD' in its Facebook name"... "they acted in concert under SUSD’s authority to retaliate against Amanda, Kim, and Edmond for exercising their First Amendment rights, thereby violating their Constitutional rights"... The lawsuit claims that Greenburg "has a long history of 'settling scores' against personal enemies through malicious litigation, defamatory impersonation, and harassment.""
Megan Fox on Twitter - ".@ASCAtweets is getting away with slipping racist, anti-white #CriticalRaceTheory into the minds of students through their counselors. This way the schools can say "it's not in the curriculum." This slide is from ASCA's 2022 conference. Do you want your kids subjected to this?"
On the American School Counselor Association
