Migrant responsible for killing 269 people in deadly bombings wins appeal after being refused asylum - "A Sri Lankan national who faced arrest in connection with the devastating 2019 Easter bombings has succeeded in his appeal against the Home Office's rejection of his asylum claim. The man, identified solely as 'YA', secured victory at the immigration Upper Tribunal in Birmingham after challenging the initial decision. The Islamic State-claimed attacks in Sri Lanka resulted in 269 deaths, with British nationals among the victims."
Mad Dogs & Englishmen.NMA. ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ๐ฌ๐ง on X - "So a guy who was questioned by Sri Lankan police over the worst Islamist massacre in their history (269 dead, churches blown up on Easter Sunday) simply gets on a plane while on bail, flies to Britain, claims “the police are persecuting me,” and a British judge says “yep, sounds legit, here’s your indefinite leave to remain.” This isn’t asylum. This is state-sanctioned suicide. We’re not a serious country anymore. We’re a giant battered-women’s shelter with an open border and a judiciary that thinks “human rights” means importing people who were suspects in mass murder because feelings. The 269 victims, including six British citizens, don’t get an appeal. They’re dead. But the bloke the police wanted to talk to about the bombs? He gets a new life in Birmingham on the taxpayer, forever. If you’re not furious, you’re not paying attention."
Matt Goodwin on X - "What you are witnessing in the UK --the daily rapes, the assaults, the loss of control--is not simply about mass immigration. Be clear about the cause. It is the logical end point of suicidal empathy. Today's ruling class believe that true virtue lies not in protecting our own people and children but sacrificing them on the altar of showing empathy to outsiders. If you do not want to live like this then you need to replace the ruling class. There is only one party, one vessel, that you can use to do just that. It is currently number one in the polls. And it terrifies the ruling class which is why they are now constantly attacking it and its leader. Do not lose focus. Register to vote. And Vote Reform."
Migrants granted asylum without face-to-face interviews - "Migrants are being granted asylum without face-to-face interviews as the Home Office tries to clear a backlog of claims."
BRITAIN IS BROKEN ๐ฌ๐ง on X - "๐จ Never forget when labour told you that illegal immigrants have MORE RIGHTS than British citizens ๐ฌ๐ง Labour MP Bridget Phillipson is asked if she agrees that the rights of illegal migrants are more important than the rights of the people of Epping. "Yes, of course we do""
It’s mad to give migrants leave to remain when we’ve no idea if they contribute - "Since 1997, Britain has been engaged in a vast demographic experiment. We have become a country not just of mass migration, but mega migration. In the 25 years before Tony Blair’s election, 68,000 more people came into the country than left it. In the 25 years after it, the figure was almost six million. But it will take just ten more years for migration to swell the population by a further 4.9 million. By the end of that period, in 2032, more than one in five people here will have been born abroad. Nobody predicted this. Nobody planned for it. Almost nobody wanted it. But it’s happened, and it’s too late to stop it. Or is it?... immigration on the present scale is immensely difficult to absorb, particularly since it is concentrated in certain places — especially London. It’s made our hellish housing crisis even worse. And there have been all manner of well-attested — and, in the case of the grooming gangs, frankly horrific — failures of integration. The main defence for mass migration has been that we need it to keep the economy and public services afloat. And that’s certainly true in part. For example, thanks to our extraordinary failure to train enough medics, only half of junior doctors in England are UK nationals. But the complacent assumption — baked into years of Treasury modelling — that migration is an unalloyed economic good has come under severe challenge. On Thursday night Andrew Bailey was asked — at the annual dinner of TheCityUK — whether increased migration was boosting the Bank of England’s (abject) growth forecasts. He paused: “Well …” In elliptical central-banker-ese, the governor explained that there is a puzzle. We have more workers. But the economy isn’t expanding. Indeed the Bank’s latest report shows that output per hour fell by 2.4 per cent in a year. So either the migrants aren’t enough to offset the sickness/laziness of existing employees. Or we’ve got the wrong kind of migrants. Of course, as the Bank acknowledges, the appalling state of our labour and population data makes the picture hugely hazy. Hazy enough to have started a grudge match between our CPS team and Prof Jonathan Portes, Britain’s most prominent advocate of mass migration, over exactly how much all these migrants are earning. But it is clear beyond doubt that very many are not earning enough — or not earning at all. Let’s go over the statistics. Astonishingly, just 12 per cent of visas issued between 2021 and 2023 were for skilled workers. Within that, 60 per cent — 254,347 — were for the health and care sub-route (slightly more than the 6,000 people a year the health department originally predicted). The overwhelming majority of these workers went into social care, and into low-paid jobs. The official Migration Advisory Committee puts the average salary on the route — even including any doctors, nurses, midwives, etc — at just £24,000. For the other 40 per cent of skilled workers, it was £45,000 — a cavernous difference. Those care workers were also allowed to bring dependants — in fact more dependants have come than actual workers. Sometimes the discrepancies are extraordinary. My colleague Karl Williams points out that in the first six months of 2024 we gave out 1,063 health & care visas to workers from Zimbabwe, and 10,670 visas to dependants of those workers and/or their predecessors. Some of these dependants, or those arriving via the family visa route, may themselves work, but there are shocking variations. More than half of women in the UK born in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh have never had a job here. Then there are students who come to do one-year master’s courses but spend most of their time as Deliveroo drivers — or even claim asylum. In short, there are hundreds of thousands of new migrants — though there is ferocious argument over the precise proportion — who will cost the country more than they contribute. This cost will, of course, be spread over very many years. And it is the subject of huge uncertainty. It may be that migrants’ wages increase after arrival, as Prof Portes argues. But conversely, the survey data from the ONS tends to undercount low-paid migrants, and OBR’s fiscal profiles cut off at the age of 82, excluding the cost to the NHS of extreme old age. That said, it is true that too many of those born here are not contributing enough, either. But why use migration to make the problem worse?"
Jonatan Pallesen on X - "New report: mass immigration to the UK has caused an increase in rents of £132 per month in England and £216 per month in London. This is about 5% of the median after-tax income in England, and higher for London. That renters are now poorer because of mass immigration. The Boriswave alone caused a (further) increase in rents of 3.7%"
Weird how increased demand results in more "greed"
Good Morning Britain on X - "ITV has been given exclusive access to film the deportation of dozens of foreign migrant criminals. They were put on a flight to Romania after losing their right to remain in Britain. They had served sentences for offences including theft, sexual abuse and murder. The operation to remove the 47 migrants, who came to the UK legally, cost hundreds of thousands of pounds. They were given bank cards preloaded with up to £2,000 each to help them resettle in Romania. @itvnews UK Editor @PaulBrandITV explains what he saw."
Michelle Dewberry on X - "Ladies & gents, the hypocrisy of many on the Left…Summed up here, courtesy of @paulmasonnews Ready?: You *can’t* call 100,000+ foreign men illegally entering the U.K “an invasion” because “that rhetoric has no place in mainstream politics” BUT You *can* call 100,000+ Brits attending a legal rally in their own capital city ‘an invasion’ Got it? Good.๐คฏ …I mean honestly, what does one even say to this level of ridiculousness ๐คฃ๐คฆ๐ผ♀️ ๐คก๐"
Left wingers just hate white people
Migrant jailed for 10 years over rape of 15-year-old girl - "A migrant who was granted asylum in the UK after several attempts to deport him has been jailed for more than 10 years over the rape of a 15-year-old girl. Anicet Mayela, 41, carried out the attack in December last year when inebriated and caused the teenage girl to become pregnant... He pleaded guilty to a single count of rape at the same court in April this year, but continues to profess his innocence and previously made an attempt to vacate his original plea, which was rejected by a judge in September... The judge said: “For her, it was her first sexual experience, and the misery that you caused to that child who became pregnant as a result must have been extreme... It is understood the Home Office initially refused Mayela’s asylum claim in 2004 but he successfully challenged the decision in the courts and was eventually granted leave to remain on appeal in 2010. According to an article published by the Institute of Race Relations (IRR), an “anti-racist think-tank”, in 2005, Mayela was served three removal notices and left with a broken hand during one deportation attempt. Another flight is said to have been grounded after the airline’s cabin crew refused to carry him... By 2005 he was being held in immigration detention centres while attempts were made to deport him but he was later released. Mayela, thought to be a former economics student, also appears to have supported protests outside the Campsfield House detention centre, where asylum seekers were being held in custody prior to deportation from Britain, following the death by hanging at the centre of a Turkish man in June 2005."
Dr. Maalouf on X - "ENGLAND: And yet another migrant named Muhammad attempted to rape a 14-year-old British girl. He defends himself: "I am Muslim. We have our own Islamic rules. Talk to my embassy.” Look how he says that, like it’s a normal thing in his culture. Evil!"
British Intel on X - "๐จ๐ฌ๐ง WATCH: THE REALITY OF BRITAIN IN 2025
Do not look away. This is the story they tried to soften, distort and bury. A 15-year-old British girl was raped in a Leamington park by two Afghan illegal migrants. The legacy media lied about who the attackers were. They even lied about the victim’s age to downplay the horror. She is now terrified to leave her home - another child whose life has been destroyed by a border policy that protects everyone except the British people. While our politicians preach “compassion”, British families are paying the price. While the media scolds concern as “bigotry”, children are being harmed. This is not an isolated case. This is what happens when a nation loses control of its borders - and its courage to speak honestly"
Sam Ashworth-Hayes on X - "Afghan small boat migrants living in taxpayer-funded housing drag child into a park to rape her; lawyers try to block the release of names and footage in case it causes rioting. Perfect illustration of UK instincts: managing "community tensions" as ultimate good."
Wesley Yang on X - ""Free speech cannot coexist with multiculturalism" was once a warning from the right and now is a directive enforced by left-liberals in power"
Jeremy Carl on X - "Two young Afghan "asylum seekers" r-ped a young woman so horrifically that their legal defense attempted to suppress video footage of the crimes and mention that the criminals were Afghans on the grounds that it would lead to rioting. The epitome of the modern establishment at work. Suppress the truth because if the truth were known, the people would riot."
rosbifenthusiast on X - "We are now at the point where a primary concern of the courts is the protection of the political class from the public reaction to migrant rape"
Leo Kearse - on YouTube & touring on X - "The defence lawyer for the Afghan migrants who raped a 15 year old girl asked the judge to "stop the press from being able to say the rapists were Afghan asylum seekers". Every part of the leftist blob lies and obfuscates anything that contradicts their "diversity=strength""
Afghan asylum seeker charted his journey across Europe posing in TikTok videos clad in designer gear and a gold watch before arriving in the UK where he raped a 15-year-old schoolgirl - "An Afghan asylum seeker jailed for brutally raping a 15-year-old British schoolgirl in a park charted his journey across Europe on TikTok. Often clad in designer gear with expensive trainers, this is the image that Jan Jahanzeb, 17, projected to the world once he arrived in Europe from Afghanistan. But behind the slick faรงade and boyish good looks, lurked a sexual predator who has now been jailed for 10 years and 8 months for the brutal rape of a 15-year-old girl in a park in Leamington Spa, Warwickshire. Jahanzeb acted with his friend, fellow Afghan asylum seeker Israr Niazal, also 17, who was jailed for nine years 10 months for luring their victim away from her friends into a wooded area where they forced themselves upon her. Much of the content of Jahanzeb’s social media story is staged around parks and public spaces in Belgium as he poses shamelessly in selfies, sometimes showing off the star tattoos on his neck. Soon after leaving Afghanistan, he appears to have got a tattoo of three stars on his neck, which is a sign he was carrying money and could come from a middle class background in Afghanistan... The judge Sylvia de Bertodano at his sentencing told Jahanzeb: ‘You left Afghanistan after you say threats were made to you and your family, and you spent about nine months travelling to the UK. ‘You travelled through many countries, often on foot and I am sure that your journey was both difficult and dangerous. I accept that this amounts to a traumatic set of experiences for a young person. I am told that is possible that you are suffering from PTSD. ‘ But in many of his posts, dressed in designer gear and sometimes sunglasses, Jahanzeb appears not to have a care in the world as he preens at the camera, often accompanied by a backing track of Dari music... Ironically, given his crime, in another TikTok video which he reposts, he appears to be staking his claim for women's rights in Afghanistan. A poster of a schoolgirl being silenced with a man's hand around her mouth is accompanied by an anti-Taliban sentiment: 'May God destroy the oppressors, the poor virgins of our country, Amen', accompanied by Afghan flag and crying emojis... 'When you discussed the offence you tried to minimise your responsibility, blaming your co-defendant for getting you involved, and the victim herself for pushing you and kissing you, as well as the fact that you were drunk. 'You say that you are inexperienced in sexual matters; your reluctance to talk about it makes the truth of this assertion difficult to assess, although I do of course understand that given your age your sexual experience is necessarily limited.' Now, following Jahanzeb’s conviction for rape, he faces deportation back to Afghanistan at the end of his long sentence."
Steven Edginton on X - "An Afghan has just been charged with raping two teenage girls in Bolton. You could be forgiven for thinking this is the same story as you may have seen yesterday, in which two Afghans were found guilty of raping a fifteen-year-old girl."
Mikey on X - 3 seperate stories on rapes involving Afghans within the last 24 hours."
Queen Bee on X - "2 months ago, a monster, a white monster, raped 2 Sikh women and every MP was falling over themselves to condemn this horrific behaviour. Quite right too. He should be caught and face a life sentence. However, in less than 24 hours its been reported that 3 young teenage girls have reportedly been raped by 3 Afghan men, in 2 separate attacks, one being a horrific gangrape, and not one single MP, that I have seen, that commented previously, has said a word. They cant keep telling the British people that their women and girls matter so little, their lives are superfluous to their immigration agenda, and keep expecting endless amounts of tolerance. People are seething with rage. If these men cant be removed, they have to be prevented from coming in."
Furious Scots parents pull kids out of school & protest over 'unvetted' migrants attending English lessons - "Safety fears were sparked after videos were posted on social platforms showing a large group of men hanging around the school campus between classes. School bosses have now axed the lessons as parents questioned why there wasn’t more communication around the service, said to be funded by a charity... The mum-of-four added: “My main concern is the presence of individuals I believe to be men who have not been adequately checked by the council. “We don’t know their past histories, and that concerns me because they are sharing a space with my child. “My concern is purely about the safety of my child inside a ‘secured entry’ school where she can’t easily get out if something were to happen.”... “This is a massive problem. It’s a gigantic loophole for unvetted people to access children. Because if you enter a campus on an educational basis, you do not require a PVG by law. “If you go in there to fit a lightbulb as a tradesman, you need a PVG. That is utterly scandalous. It’s reckless and it’s an absolute dereliction of duty.”"
Council backs motion to stand up to far right as ‘Pink Ladies’ march through Whitechapel - " Tower Hamlets Council backed a motion affirming its dedication to stand up to the far right as a group of women known as the “Pink Ladies” protested in Whitechapel on 8 October. The group said they were in the area to demand action on what they called “violence against women by undocumented migrants”. The council said that the Pink Ladies’ framing “mirrors far-right narratives” that aim to demonise undocumented migrants. A spokesperson for the council expressed worry that the usage of terms like “illegal migrant violence” is more in line with political radicalism than with sound public safety rhetoric. Counter-protester and pro-Palestine activist, Pheobe Bloom told Eastlondonlines: “It is unacceptable to me that anyone would try to say that immigrants cause the most violence against women and girls when we know that’s not the case, it’s a rhetoric which has been used to demonise immigrants and remove them from our society.” “I think there are probably some [protesters] who are quite far right and have racist and unacceptable beliefs and genuinely hate migrants and believe in the white replacement theory,” she added, referring to the debunked “great replacement” conspiracy theory that white people are intentionally being replaced by other ethnicities... The claim that illegal migrants commit domestic or sexual violence at a higher rates than citizens or documented residents, however, is not supported by any reliable public data."
No surprise that the media are spreading misinformation again
Thread by @MigrationWatch on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "Kensington and Chelsea - Britain's most expensive local authority - has transformed from 90.7% White British in 1961 to just 34.7% in 2021. 59.7% of social housing in Kensington is occupied by immigrants: an implied subsidy of ~£200 million every year. Credit to @juice8882
Privately renting a 4 bedroom flat in Kensington and Chelsea would cost you on average £5,186/month. But an immigrant with a social housing tenancy would pay just £806/month. Is this fair? Credit to @AylmerTH for the map below. Check your local area at migrationfacts.com. Credit to @PimlicoJournal for their excellent articles on social housing, and useful statistics on comparative costs of housing in Kensington and Chelsea."
Farrukh on X - "Daisy Cooper, "In 2017 there was not a single asylum seeker that arrived on a boat" "Today we have 46,000 a year" "And do you know why?" "Brexit" "Pushed through by Boris Johnson and championed by Nigel Farage" *audience erupts in applause" #BBCQT "Nigel Farage should be here to night apologising to the British people""
Andrew Neil on X - "Politicians now gaslight us unconstrained. This one says not a single asylum seeker/illegal immigrant came by boat in 2017. And was applauded for it. But that’s because they were pouring in by the thousands hidden in lorries and other transport. It was only when improved technology made that very difficult that they switched to boats. It’s all well documented. But they still think they can lie with impunity."
Home Office admits 170 terrorists cannot be deported from Britain due to human rights laws - "Human rights laws are blocking the deportation of dozens of high-risk extremists, forcing authorities to monitor them round the clock, it has emerged. The Home Office is facing outrage after revealing around 170 dangerous foreign nationals cannot be deported from the UK with more than half linked to terrorism or extremist activity"
It's reasonable to give British people greater priority for social housing - "There has been controversy on social media in recent months about the proportion of social housing which is occupied by people born overseas, and the number who are not UK nationals (two different things). Hopefully this post will give people easier access to the data and trends on on both... ets look at the proportion of social tenants where the head of the household (the “Household Reference Person” in census jargon) was born overseas, with data from Census 2021. I have mapped it at the level of the parliamentary constituency, but finer-grained data is available, down to the level of the neighbourhood. There is massive variation around the country: Less than 7% were born abroad in Wales, while it was 20% in England as a whole and just under half (47.6%) in Greater London. This last statistic, about Greater London, is the one that has triggered lots of debate online... If people are UK Citizens they have the same rights as other people - but from an economic point of view, people becoming British nationals doesn’t make much difference to the effect on the scarce supply of housing. In greater London the number of socially rented properties is very similar to 2001: it was 801,000 in 2001, fell to 781,000 by 2010, and recovered to 793,000 by 2022. Having 377,000 occupied by people born overseas (or 183,000 who arrived since 2001) still means those properties are not available for other people... Of course, we can build more council houses, but this is not cheap, particularly in expensive cities like London. Through the Affordable Housing Programme 2021-26 the government is investing £11.5 billion across the country to build about 180,000 affordable homes of various kinds. Across England and Wales as a whole, people born overseas were a bit more likely to be in social housing than people born in the UK: 18% compared to 17% in 2021. On the one hand, that rather undermines the argument of those who still think migration is ‘rocket fuel for growth’. If our long term policy had been selecting high wage migrants to make Britain the grammar school of the western world, then the share of migrants in social housing would be much lower than for those born in the UK. Instead, it is slightly higher. The cash benefits system sees similar trends: the proportion of non-EU nationals who have been in the UK for more than five years who are in receipt of benefits is higher than for UK nationals - 28% vs 25%. The truth is that a significant chunk of UK immigration is not for work, and that a large chunk of those who are coming for work are coming for low wage work, or to work in the grey economy, just as was the case decades ago. But the distinction between UK nationals and every other nationality lumped together conceals much more than it reveals. There is massive variation between people from different countries. Western Europe, Canada, New Zealand, the USA all see low proportions in social housing. In contrast people from countries like Afghanistan, Ghana, Jamaica and Somalia, the proportions are very high (36%, 37%, 41% and 72% respectively). There is big variation within regions: looking at South Asia, rates varied from 6% for people from India to 15% for people from Pakistan to 34% for people from Bangladesh. While the average for people from Africa was 32%, the range ran from 9% for South Africa, to eight times that for people from Somalia... Social housing by nationality... The share of new social lettings in England to lead tenants who are not British nationals climbed from a bit under 6%, to just under 10% in 2021/22... it was 17% across Greater London but as high as 40% in Brent, and above 20% in several London Boroughs. In places like Manchester it was over a fifth, and not far off a fifth in places like Sheffield and Birmingham. It was also high in smaller cities like Ipswich, Oxford and Leicester... Obviously the discussion about giving British nationals greater priority for social housing is part of a wider debate about the purpose of social housing. Since the 1977 Housing Act the allocation of social housing has been needs-based rather than contribution-based or desert-based. This is a big change. In the early and middle part of the twentieth century, social housing often charged higher-than-market rents, but offered high quality housing to replace slums, and the selection of tenants was made on the basis of who was reliable and deserving. It often came with a hefty side order of methodisty / fabian social reform. As a young man in post-war Castlemilk my father had to travel a long way to go to the pub, because Glasgow banned pubs on Corporation property between the 1890s and the 1960s. But social housing gradually came to be allocated on the basis of what people needed need not what they were seen to deserve or have earned - a process accelerated by the 1977 Act. This radically changed people’s incentives in the process. The Hills Report (p100-111) published under the last Labour government found that social tenants had employment rates lower even than equivalently disadvantaged people who were not in social housing. This may reflect the greater difficulty of moving for work for social tenants, or the incentives set up by social housing itself, both to enter the system and move within it. While employment rates have improved since 2010, households in social housing are still much more likely to be workless than private renters or those paying mortgages. In cities like London the net result is that large numbers of workless households are housed in expensive properties in the centre of the city, while many other people commute a long way and pay a lot to be there for work. This has inevitably led to a ongoing debate about whether there are better ways to help poor households and working people facing high costs... migration policy has been off track for a long time"
Left wingers don't think nationality should determine eligibility or priority for voting or benefits, because they don't think nationality makes sense in the first place
