L'origine de Bert

Get email updates of new posts:        (Delivered by FeedBurner)

Saturday, May 30, 2026

Links - 30th May 2026 (1 - Donald Trump [including White House Correspondents Dinner Shooting])

Matt Walsh on X - "Just to be clear, the theory that leftists are running with is that the Trump Administration somehow convinced a registered Democrat to volunteer to go to prison for the rest of his life so that they could use him as a patsy for a third staged assassination attempt -- one that, they apparently believe, was concocted mostly to justify building a White House ballroom that's already being built anyway. That's their theory of the case here."

Clay Travis on X - "On Wednesday @RepJeffries called for “Maximum Warfare Everywhere All The Time,” with a picture of Trump. Again, this attempted assassin didn’t go rogue. Democrats created him with their rhetoric. He believes he’s a hero. They told him to kill Trump & he tried to do it."

Skeletor 🧼🧽🫧 on X - "For a party that wants to take away guns, Democrats certainly love using them to murder conservatives."

ThePersistence on X - "HOLY COW. The gunman that opened fire at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner is 31-year-old Cole Allen — a teacher from Torrance, California. It appears that Cole donated via ActBlue to Kamala Harris for President. Another radicalized democrat assassination attempt."

'This Is A Both Sides Issue,' Says Side That Shot President Trump, Assassinated Charlie Kirk, Tried To Assassinate Kavanaugh, Tried To Shoot Trump Again, Shot Steve Scalise, Firebombed Governor Shapiro, Tried To Shoot Trump A Third Time, (cont'd) | Babylon Bee - "(cont'd) murdered schoolkids in Minnesota, murdered schoolchildren in Nashville, burned an elderly Jewish woman to death in Colorado, murdered a couple at the Jewish embassy in D.C., seized campus buildings and held janitors hostage, assaulted students on campus who appeared Jewish, ambushed ICE officers in Dallas and shot an officer in the neck, assassinated FBI officer David Underwood, assassinated the United Healthcare CEO, cheered the murder of over 1,200 civilians on October 7th, murdered schoolkids in Colorado in 2019, injured over 700 police offers in 2020 riots, murdered retired police captain David Dorn, murdered a 16-year-old boy in "CHAZ", burned down Minneapolis, firebombed a Washington ICE center, murdered six people in Waukesha, assassinated five Dallas officers in 2016, assassinated three police in Baton Rouge in 2016 (you know what, we're going to stop now, this is getting sad)."

Chad Prather on X - "While you hacks talk about Karoline Leavitt’s use of a common phrase like “shots fired” at what is traditionally a political comedy roast, let’s discuss @jimmykimmel calling Melania Trump an “expectant widow” just prior to actual shots being fired."

Mari Otsu on X - "As my colleagues and I walked toward the Hilton for the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, a man shouted “F*** you!” right at us — simply because we were attending. Later that night, after the shooting, we were running to the White House for the briefing when we passed three teenage girls glued to their phones, reacting to the news. One of them said, “Aw man, I wish they got him,” and her two friends giggled. That moment stopped me cold. When our young people casually cheer for violence like it’s a game, we have a serious problem. Radicalization isn’t some abstract issue — it’s showing up casually in everyday conversations and in our kids’ attitudes."
Damn violent right wingers! We need to jail them all!

Donnie Cope on X - "Another Leftist tried to take out President Trump because he believes the Epstein lies that Liberals spread about him being guilty of crimes against children, despite there being ZERO evidence of that. The Left does not care about the truth. They don't care about what's real. They HOPE they'll influence the craziest among them to actually k*ll people. This is the reality of the Left. πŸ‘ˆπŸ™„"
This won't stop left wingers continuing to lie to try to manifest reality

Donnie Cope on X - "The shooter:
πŸ”· Was a 31 year old Black male from California.
πŸ”· Was a teacher, engineer, and scientist.
πŸ”· Was awarded, "Teacher of the Month," in 2024.
πŸ”· Listed "he/him" pronouns in his LinkedIn bio.
πŸ”· Donated to the Kamala Harris 2024 Presidential campaign.
πŸ”· Was armed with a shotgun, a pistol, and multiple knives.
πŸ”· Shot an officer in the chest while storming the security perimeter.
This doesn't appear to be some desperately lost mentally unstable outcast. This appears to be a highly educated mainstream Leftist, with a functioning mind and a decent career, who simply put his mainstream Leftist beliefs into action by trying to kill his political opponents. You can't spend 10 years teaching young Americans that Conservatives are, "evil threats to our democracy," while routinely implying support for assassinating them, and then act surprised when young men grow into attempted assassins."
I guess this false flag cost a lot, because they had to pay off the officer who got shot

Matt Walsh on X - "I’m officially convinced. It was a hoax. The Trump Administration recruited a leftist Kamala Harris voting Trump hater to participate in a staged assassination that would include the shooter getting shot at and then locked in federal prison for the rest of his life. The Kamala Harris voter agreed to this plan, that works against his political and personal interests, because he’s just like a really generous guy. Meanwhile the Trump Administration, despite dastardly planning multiple assassination hoaxes, decided to keep their patsy alive and a permanent liability to them, rather than just killing him like they could have easily done. They did this because they also are really strangely generous in a very odd and specific way. So in summary we have a plot where all parties involved are working against their own interests with no real discernible benefit to any of them. There is no evidence of this plan and it doesn’t even make any intuitive sense and the motives for everyone are unclear if not insane, but still I believe it because I’m a very smart person."

Kangmin Lee | 이강민 on X - "The left
>calls for Trump to be assassinated every single day
>has prominent left-wing pundits who openly encourage “someone” to “do it”
>murdered Charlie Kirk and incessantly mocks his widow
>celebrated the murder of Charlie Kirk with dancing, memes, and open glee on social media
>lamented that Thomas Crooks missed when he tried to kill Trump
>shoots up Christian schools and targets houses of worship
>the most mentally unstable group of people on the planet in the history of humanity
>celebrates the assassination of healthcare CEOs and glorifies the murderer
>engages in firebombings and armed attacks on ICE facilities, shooting at officers and federal agents
>stages violent riots that burn down cities, attack police, and destroy businesses under the banner of “mostly peaceful protests”
>doxxes, harasses, and incites violence against political opponents, journalists, and ordinary Trump voters
>defends and platforms "activists" who physically assault conservatives, smash windows, and use bike locks as weapons
>pushes rhetoric that dehumanizes conservatives as “Nazis,” “fascists,” or “threats to democracy” to justify violence against them
>routinely threatens or praises violence against pro-life centers, churches, and conservative speakers on college campuses
>maintains a culture where political violence is treated as righteous when aimed at conservatives
And you actually believe it’s more plausible that every Trump assassination attempt is fake and staged… than a deranged leftist snapping and trying to murder him? Any "right-winger" pushing these truly unhinged conspiracy theories with zero evidence actively runs cover for these leftist terrorists who would cheer if you and your family were dead."

Rep. Andy Ogles says journalist under a table said, "I hope they kill the orange MF" as the Trump assassin opened fire | Not the Bee

Chris Waites | Facebook - "Okay. Let's say the Trump assassination attempt was staged. Just for a little thought experiment. If it were proven to be real. For example, if the assassin succeeded. What would your reaction be? Would it be horror? ... I bet it wouldn't be. We already saw how you laughed when a son and father imploded in a sub and said you wished more of them died that way. We saw how you reacted when just some guy with the wrong job was fucking assassinated, and we have seen you literally publicly adore his sufficiently handsome killer. We've seen how you reacted when a father-- and a young one at that-- was shot in the neck in front of thousands for offering to publicly debate extremely mainstream middle of the road opinions which you declared "fascist" despite being shit your own father with high probability agrees with significant amounts of. We've seen how you've treated his widow for not being "the perfect victim". Did you know this isn't a term I made up? When women make claims of victimhood in a way the left is sympathetic towards but do not behave in any way that would denote victimhood and people comment on this, you-- rightly-- accuse them of condemning a woman who isn't "the perfect victim". So, let's go back to Trump. Lets say it hadn't been fake and the guy succeeded. What would your reaction be? My guess is that there would not be a moment where you realize you have gone too far. Maybe some of you would? But not enough for a collective pause. You are consistently picking whatever position is the opposite of empathy. You are openly, wantonly, and unapologetically being sociopathic sadists who seem to have a sort of near-sexual kink for celebrating pain and misery if its directed at whatever you can connect to your pyramid of power, even when it contradicts who would have been on your pyramid of power a week ago. If it wasn't staged not one part of your behavior would change. This is evil. And while I wouldn't suggest you are beyond redemption-- hell, even Fucking Darth Vader realized at the last second that he couldn't take any more evil-- collectively it is a moral decay that is making you all miserable and, moreover, miserable to be around. Let me just repeat this one more time: If it wasn't staged, nothing about your behavior would differ."

The left is having a complete meltdown in real time : r/libsofreddit - "The left: "KILL TRUMP KILL TRUMP KILL TRUMP KILL TRUMP KILL TRUMP KILL TRUMP KILL TRUMP KILL TRUMP KILL TRUMP KILL TRUMP"
The left: attempts to kill Trump
The left: "STAGED STAGED STAGED STAGED STAGED STAGED STAGED""

Media Still Stumped As To Motive Of Gunman With Manifesto Titled ‘Why I'm Going To Kill Donald J. Trump’ | Babylon Bee

Collin Rugg on X - "Man who went viral for remaining in his seat as he ate food during the WH Correspondents' Dinner shooting says he didn't want his new tux on the dirty Hilton floor. He also said he is from New York, so he hears sirens and activity all the time. "I’m a New Yorker. We live with sirens and activity happening all the time," Michael Glantz, an agent at Creative Artists Agency, said. "I wasn’t scared. There are hundreds of Secret Service agents hurtling themselves over tables and chairs, and I wanted to watch." "First of all, I have a bad back. I couldn’t get on the floor, and if I did get on the floor, they’d have to bring in people to get me off the floor. And No. 2, I’m a hygiene freak. There was no freaking way I was getting in my new tux on the dirty Hilton floor. It was not happening.""
If you consistently apply left wing logic, this means he was in on the conspiracy of the staged shooting

Barack Obama on X - "Although we don’t yet have the details about the motives behind last night's shooting at the White House Correspondents Dinner, it’s incumbent upon all us to reject the idea that violence has any place in our democracy. It’s also a sobering reminder of the courage and sacrifice that U.S. Secret Service Agents show every day. I’m grateful to them – and thankful that the agent who was shot is going to be okay."
Sarai (Sarah Idan) Miss Iraq on X - "If you’re wondering why he would make a statement this ridiculous, from a psychological point of view, this is what it does: it creates doubt where clarity already exists. That is a classic political manipulation tactic. You don’t deny the evidence directly; you simply imply that the public should “wait for details,” which SLOWS moral judgment and protects the side whose ideology may be implicated. He is not speaking to people who already know the facts. He is speaking to people who need permission not to process the facts. His language gives them a psychological escape hatch: “We don’t know yet,” “Don’t jump to conclusions,” “Maybe there are other motives” That protects them from cognitive dissonance. The genius of this kind of framing is that it can manipulate the opposition too. It forces people to waste energy proving what is already visible, while his supporters accuse them of being partisan, MAGA, or inflammatory. That is how gaslighting affects opposition: it turns reality itself into the battlefield. This is how propaganda and political indoctrination work: deny clarity, create doubt, then accuse anyone who names the truth of being partisan."

Tyler Black, MD on X - "Obama: 11, including a guy who fired 25 rifle rounds at the White House. Biden: 5, including one arrested 4 miles from his house with an AR-15 and a checklist ending "execute."
Harris: 2 federal prosecutions.
Clinton: a pipe bomb intercepted at her home and a militia."
Thread by @politicalmath on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "The 11 Obama "assassination attempts" include (not making this up)
- a Hispanic man shot 25 rounds at the White House from his truck when Obama was in another state
- an accountant was at a waffle house when he said he wanted to kill Obama
- an extremist Irish Islamist gave an interview to a major newspaper and said he wished that he could assassinate Obama
- a "death ray" plot in which 2 rednecks planned to use x-rays to kills Obama (and also Jews)
- a Walking Dead actress sent Obama a letter with ricin in an attempt to incriminate her husband
The attempts to assassinate President Trump have resulted in 1 death, 2 people wounded, and 1 Secret Service agent shot The assassination attempts on Obama were not anything like this. Stop bullshitting people."

Jenni on X - "Barack Obama was targeted 11 times in assassination attempts during his two terms. We don't remember any of them because they were handled through proper channels, professionally, and he isn't a whiny bitch."
Left wingers can't tell the difference between assassination attempts and assassination plots. But they can't tell the difference between legal immigrants and illegal immigrants, or even men and women either, so
Comment (elsewhere): "Wait, wait, wait 🀣🀣🀣 like 3 days ago the whole left wing thing to prove it was staged is that "murica racist, nobody tried to kill barry and mike, so these must be faked" 🀣🀣🀣"

Tim Pool on X - "Trump is a blundering idiot who can't do anything right, there is no plan, he even bankrupted a casino. Also he orchestrated an assassination false flag with a fake Democrat intel sleeper in front of hundreds of journalists pulling off a circuitous plan to justify his ballroom"

Meme - Kirsche πŸ₯₯ 🧁 @KirscheVerstahl: "nothing pisses me off more than this level of blatant lying and the people who fall for it or defend it as if we are all retarded" *Gretchen Whitmer with "8645" standup*
Governor Gretchen Whitmer @GovWhitmer: "I am relieved that everyone is safe following last night’s horrifying shooting at the White House Correspondents Dinner. The violence has to stop now. It is not who we are. I am grateful for the swift action of law enforcement."

Meme - Secret Service Agent: "MR. PRESIDENT, A LEFT-WING TERRORIST IS HERE TO ASSASSINATE YOU AND YOUR SUPPORTERS AGAIN!"
Trump: "AHH... IE ONLY WE COULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT ALL THIS FAR-LEFT VIOLENCE." *surrounded by DHS, NSA, FBI, DOJ, CIA and Secret Service*

Suspect in D.C. gala shooting was 'strongly anti-Christian': Trump - "The man accused of storming the White House Correspondents’ Dinner spent years quietly acquiring his arsenal, purchasing a shotgun from a Torrance, California, firearms dealer eight months before the attack and a semi-automatic pistol two years earlier, according to a law enforcement intelligence profile reviewed by Bloomberg... The attack will likely put new scrutiny on train security. Unlike air travel, passengers are not required to declare firearms on Amtrak. Blanche said investigators have not yet determined how Allen transported the weapons across state lines but pushed back on calls to tighten protocols."
How many radicalised left wing terrorists are out there, waiting to strike?
Crossing state lines is only bad when it hurts the left wing agenda (like with Kyle Rittenhouse)

Study shows women are more likely to vote for Trump during their 'fertile window' - but it's not because they have a crush on him - "Researchers in New York City revisited 2010 study that looked the impact of a woman's menstrual cycle on who they voted for in the 2008 election between Barack Obama and John McCain. The original work suggested that while they were ovulating - which is when the risk of pregnancy is highest - female voters favored Obama due to 'genetic fitness,' such as age and attractiveness. However, the study had a small sample size with little diversity, as most participants were young, white women. This led a team of psychologists at the New School for Social Research to conduct a follow-up ahead of the 2020 election against Trump and Joe Biden. Among more than 500 participants, the researchers found a small but 'statistically significant' relationship between female voter fertility and their candidate preference. They noted that women in their fertile window had a slightly increased preference for Donald Trump over Barack Obama. Interestingly, they found that this was due to his intelligence rather than attractiveness."
Fertility Fails to Predict Voter Preference for the 2020 Election: A Pre-Registered Replication of Navarrete et al. (2010)

Trump is taking on the historical revisionists | The Spectator - "Ahead of Independence Day last week, CNN went live to its correspondent Leyla Santiago. Here is how she described the upcoming celebrations: ‘Kicking off the Independence Day weekend, President Trump will be at Mount Rushmore, where he’ll be standing in front of a monument of two slave owners and on land wrestled away from Native Americans.’ She went on to report that the President was expected to focus on efforts to ‘tear down our country’s history’. And where might the President have acquired such an idea? Even a few years ago it would have been unthinkable for a major network like CNN to have described Mount Rushmore in such nakedly hostile terms. America still had its agreed-upon holy sites, people and ideas — revered as unifying points of the nation’s past and necessary for any conceivable future. Not any more. Today every element of the American past is up for grabs... It is stunning to watch, this unweaving of a nation. While it has been going on for decades, the latest orgy of iconoclasm has seen crowds assail statues of the Founding Fathers with equal ferocity to that aimed at Confederates. A statue of George Washington pulled down in Portland, Oregon had ‘genocidal colonist’ spray-painted on it. A statue of Thomas Jefferson, pulled down outside a school, was graffitied with ‘slave owner’ as well as the name of George Floyd. Far from spontaneous, this is the logical conclusion of a radical, revisionist view of American history that has been fomented for years. This sees Christopher Columbus as the start of the problem, slavery as the country’s other characterising sin, and everything since then as typified by ‘white supremacy’ and racism. The campaign has been very well organised. Last year the New York Times launched its ongoing ‘1619 Project’... Despite its factual and moral sloppiness, the project was awarded a Pulitzer prize. Statues downed in recent weeks have been tagged with ‘1619’, and when one commentator suggested that the recent nation-wide riots in America be called ‘The 1619 riots’, the project’s creator Nikole Hannah-Jones responded: ‘It would be an honour. Thank you.’ Nor is it just about the statues. One poll last month revealed that 70 per cent of self-identified ‘liberals’ want the US Constitution to be rewritten. Similar numbers want the national anthem to be changed and the school curriculum to take in more of the bigotry-founded-in-sin view of US history. It is in this context that President Trump chose to address the nation from Mount Rushmore... His Mount Rushmore speech was an important event. It constituted the strongest pushback a president could make against a divide that has festered during his presidency. Part of it was spent identifying enemies new as well as old. Trump talked of the ‘new far-left fascism that demands absolute allegiance’. He spoke of how this ‘left-wing cultural revolution is designed to overthrow the American revolution’. He mentioned the absurdity of an education system which teaches children ‘to hate their own country’. But the speech was more subtle than this makes it sound. The problem, as the President said, is that in this new view of history, ‘all perspective is obscured’. He — or his speechwriters — then did something very simple. He gave a succinct history lesson on each of the four figures carved into the mountain behind him. It was a wonderful thing to hear. Not the hostile, monochrome, ahistorical register in which all dead figures have lately come to be described, but a succinct reminder of why George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt came to be immortalised. Demonstrating that this is an inclusive, not exclusionist, story, his speech wove other heroes into this tradition. Trump talked of Dr Martin Luther King’s urge to his fellow citizens ‘not to rip down their heritage, but to live up to their heritage’. And, announcing a new park to celebrate the heroes of America, he listed some of these great Americans, including Frederick Douglass, Jesse Owens and Louis Armstrong. As he finished reeling off this genuinely diverse list, he added: ‘Only America could have produced them all.’ Trump’s critics responded in the only way they know how. The Washington Post ran a column claiming the President was running ‘an openly racist campaign’ and that ‘everyone knows that what he is really defending is not “our freedom” or “our history” but, rather, “white power”’. CNN asserted that in his speech, the President had ‘defended Confederate monuments’, when he had done no such thing. And Senator Tammy Duckworth (one of the women Joe Biden may choose as his running mate) claimed that the President had ‘spent all his time talking about dead traitors’. Asked whether statues of George Washington should come down, she ducked what has become a difficult question... in fighting back against the 1619 view of American history, he is doing something important not just for his own survival, but for the survival of the republic. After all, if Mount Rushmore is ‘stolen’, then what of the rest of the country? And if all the land is stolen, the Founding Fathers were only slavers and the Constitution is a product of ‘white supremacy’, then what exactly holds this grand, quarter–millennial project together?"
From 2020

blog comments powered by Disqus
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Latest posts (which you might not see on this page)

powered by Blogger | WordPress by Newwpthemes