Links - 10th October 2026 (2 - General Wokeness)

This Derby, Kansas, Principal Showed Teachers a Video on White Privilege, Then Had to Apologize - "A Kansas principal was reportedly forced to apologize by the local school board for simply showing a video about white privilege to faculty members. In January, Principal Tim Hamblin shared with Derby High School staff a video from Dr. Joy DeGruy, a Black author who detailed her experiences with racism and white privilege, KMUW Wichita reported. The girls basketball team had watched the video after a racist incident in 2021, and Hamblin wanted teachers to know more about what their students had watched, according to the report. But after a complaint about the video, the principal was forced to apologize—not to the students on the basketball team, but to staff members."
Of course, if she had showed them a video opposing the left wing agenda, she'd have to resign

Meme - Sam Ashworth-Hayes: "The LARP that white people are just itching to inflict violence against minorities does not stand up well to the constant stream of horrific crimes committed by migrant communities against their hosts."
"Homicide in England and Wales by ethnicity, 2023-25. Principal suspects convicted of homicide, by victim-suspect ethnic appearance
White victim, black suspect *73 suspects*
Black victim, white suspect *16 suspects*
White victim, Asian suspect *20 suspects*
Asian victim, white suspect *18 suspects*
White victim, Mixed suspect *19 suspects*
Mixed victim, white suspect *10 suspects*
White victim, Other suspect *9 suspects*
Other victim, white suspect *5 suspects*"
Bushra Shaikh @Bushra1Shaikh: "Dropped my son off at Reading Festival today, but not before having a conversation I desperately wish I didn't have to have with my child. He's visibly Brown. He's Muslim. And in the current climate, that can carry risks never want him to have to think about..."

Meme - "RANDOM GIRL YOU SEE ON TV FOR 0.5 SECONDS *pretty blonde Sara Smith at Ole Miss Rebels season opener against Louisville Cardinals on Sunday, September 6 2026, in Nashville*
WHAT HOLLYWOOD IS SHOVING DOWN OUR THROATS *Zendaya*"

Meme - Soyjak: "YOU THINK THAT CHARACTER IS UGLY? WELL NOW IM THINKING ABOUT YOU MASTERBATING!"
Keywords: THINKING ABOUT YOU MASTURBATING

Meme - "I see we have learned nothing from the horrific Islamophobia of the early 2000s. Not surprising since MAGA lunacy is in full effect in the US"
"As a member of a large Muslim Iranian family and as a Democrat, Muslims are horrible people behind closed doors. They are very racist, classist, elitist, and violent."

Meme - End Wokeness @EndWokeness: "None of these are based on real people with real accomplishments"
*6 statues of black women: Lady in Blue by Tschabalala Self, Grounded in the Stars by Thomas J. Price, Time Unfolding by Thomas J. Price, Moments Contained by Thomas J Price, Ancient Feelings by Thomas J Price, As Sounds Turn to Noise by Thomas J. Price*

Meme - "MUSLIM CONQUEST BATTLES
*many from Southern France across Southern Europe and all over the Middle East and North Africa*
*pleased Muslims*
CRUSADE BATTLES
*A few in Turkey and modern Syria and Israel*
Crusader: THE AGGRESSION WILL STOP CHRIST IS KING
*upset Muslim*"

The Be Kind brigade should be ashamed of themselves - "Cast your mind back to February. If you remember the 2026 Bafta Film Awards ceremony that took place, it will be because John Davidson, who suffers from Tourette’s syndrome, shouted out the N-word just as two black actors, Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo, stood up to present an award. An almighty row ensued. Amid the disruption, Jordan and Lindo kept calm and carried on while host Alan Cumming explained to television viewers that people with Tourette’s have no control over their language, before adding: “We apologise if you were offended.” Afterwards, Davidson, the executive producer and inspiration behind the film I Swear, said he was “deeply mortified if anyone considers my involuntary tics to be intentional or to carry any meaning”. That should have been the end of the matter. But of course, it wasn’t... Having concluded that Davidson was not disabled but racist, what happened next was perhaps inevitable. If Davidson “can’t control the slurs he says, he should watch from a separate area, not in the main audience”, declared Allison Wiltz, who describes herself as a “Black womanist scholar with a PhD.” Demanding segregation was now legitimate, as long as those to be kept apart were disabled. Sadly, it seems as if these ignorant grievance-mongers have won. I Swear has now been nominated for seven Bafta Scotland awards while one of its stars is up for an Audience Award. Deservedly so. For those who have not seen it, the film is a powerful portrayal of Davidson’s experience living with Tourette’s in the 1980s and 90s. Only, Davidson will not be in the audience in Glasgow next month. He will be kept apart, segregated from the main event, in a room set aside just for him and a few friends and family members, where he will watch the ceremony via a video link... The irony of people misunderstanding Davidson’s condition, taking offence at his outbursts, and then excluding him from their social circle is that this is precisely the kind of behaviour he portrays in his film. I Swear shows the devastating consequences those with Tourette’s suffer as a result of their involuntary shouted profanities, verbal tics, and erratic hand movements. Far from revealing their unconscious thoughts, Tourette’s sufferers act out the things they least want to say or do. We see Davidson get told off at home, bullied at school, in trouble with the police, struggling to find a job and unable to hold down a relationship. It is no exaggeration to say that Tourette’s has made his life a misery; he deserves sympathy, not punishment. To continue the crusade against him now is cruel indeed. A further irony is that those who led the charge against Davidson, and are now presumably congratulating themselves on his planned segregation, are those who most vocally champion the importance of diversity and inclusion. Their actions reveal that not all identity groups are considered equally deserving. When it comes to hierarchies of victimhood and oppression, race trumps disability. The right of people not to hear racial slurs far outweighs the rights of people with disabilities to be included."
The "kindness", "empathy" and "tolerance" squad are remarkably cruel and vicious. Of course, many of these people proclaim that they are "neurodivergent" and thus need special treatment

Mass Debaters | Facebook - "Islamists have shown a sharp understanding of Western leftist psychology and have exploited it with considerable success. They recognise that large sections of the progressive left are driven less by consistent principle than by emotion, identity, and a hunger for moral self regard. The result is selective solidarity that advances Islamist narratives while ignoring or downplaying far bloodier realities elsewhere, and while dismissing repeated exposures of fabricated material. The left’s emotional core is a simplified story of oppressor and oppressed. Colonialism, racism, and Western power are cast as the root of almost every injustice. Islamists feed this frame by presenting themselves as the authentic voice of the downtrodden. In the Israel/ Palestine conflict they supply a ready made script of indiginous resistance. Western activists, eager to signal virtue, adopt it wholesale. Documented cases of staged or misleading footage are routinely ignored. Accounts claiming to report live from Gaza have been shown, via location data and IP tracking, to be operating from Pakistan and other distant countries. Videos have circulated in which supposed casualties rise and walk once cameras appear to stop, or in which the same children appear in repeated scenes with identical editorial errors that expose the staging. This occurs on a large scale. When famine claims were loudly promoted, then challenged by detaled figures showing the projections did not match mortality or malnutrition data, the outrage was quietly dropped rather than corrected with equal volume. The pattern serves the narrative, so inconvenient facts are sidelined. The same selectivity appears with the Iranian regime, whose repression of women, gays and dissidents draws far softer criticism than comparable systems elsewhere, and with Islamist massacres where literally thousands of innocents have been, and continue tonbe, slughtered in Nigeria and the Sahel that recieve minimal sustained attention because they do not fit the preferred story of Western guilt. This dynamic is sustained by ego and group identity. People who are egotistical and narcissistic find leftist ideology extremely enticing precisely because it allows them to grandstand about their own moral superiority while giving free rein to their inner nastiness. They can pose as compassionate champions of the oppressed in public while directing vile, aggressive rhetoric, personal attacks, and open hatred at anyone who questions the script, all without self reflection or criticism from others on the left. Look at any social media post on these topics and it becomes extremely clear who descends into the most nasty, abusive comments. It is consistently those who have adopted the ideology as a vehicle for self elevation. The grandstanding and the aggression are two sides of the same coin. Islamists and their supporters understand this weakness perfectly and exploit it to advance their own ends."

Matt Alexander on X - "After being fired for our Christian beliefs, we are now under investigation by the Ontario College of Teachers. My wife and I were fired from teaching for refusing to CELEBRATE LGBTQ with children. This marks a new chapter in the lawfare waged against us. It's time for Canada to uphold fundamental Charter Rights of ALL Canadians. We're thankful to have the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms and Charter Advocates Canada in our corner. LOST FREEDOM FILES # 2026"
John Carter on X - ""All professionals agree with woke, so woke is good."
"These professionals don't, though."
"We just revoked their certifications for not agreeing with woke. All professionals agree with woke, so woke is good.""

Students For Liberty | Facebook - "The field was long dominated by a myth. Postwar anthropology, inspired by Rousseau and Marx, held that "savages" were peaceful and cooperative. Violence, hierarchy, and inequality were supposed to be diseases of civilization, invented by property, colonization, and markets. Abolish those, and the natural harmony of man would return. Then a kid from rural Michigan went to check. In 1964, Napoleon Chagnon, one of twelve children from a poor family in Port Austin, traveled to the Venezuela–Brazil border. He went to live with the Yanomamö, roughly 20,000 people scattered across the Amazon rainforest, largely untouched by the state, by markets, or by modernity. He would return nearly thirty times over the next three decades. His 1968 book, Yanomamö: The Fierce People, sold nearly a million copies and was translated into fifteen languages. But this is what he actually found: Raids between villages were routine. Infanticide was common. Women were regularly abducted and traded after violent conflict. Headmen, as a rule, were killers. Chagnon mapped Yanomamö genealogies using early computer methods, learned the language, and lived inside the villages for months at a stretch. The data was not hearsay. A particular finding broke the field. In a 1988 paper in Science, Chagnon documented that the unokais, men who had killed in raids, had on average more wives and more surviving offspring than non-violent men of the same age. In a state of nature, violence was being reproductively selected for. The Rousseauian premise ran backwards. If violence, hierarchy, and inequality were what civilization produces, they should be rare where civilization is absent. Chagnon found the opposite. Where the state, the market, and modern institutions had never arrived, up to 30% of adult male deaths were violent. The men who killed were the men whose lineages survived. In the modern United States that figure is under 1%. The reaction was immediate. Marshall Sahlins, one of Chagnon's former graduate teachers at Michigan, turned on him. Terence Turner and Leslie Sponsel circulated a warning to the American Anthropological Association (AAA) describing "an anthropological heart of darkness beyond the imagining of even a Joseph Conrad, though not, perhaps, a Joseph Mengele." Salesian missionaries in the region joined the coalition. What Chagnon had found could not be answered on its merits, so the man who found it became the target instead. Then came the book that ended him. In 2000, journalist Patrick Tierney published Darkness in El Dorado. He accused Chagnon of triggering a measles epidemic through vaccine experimentation, arming rival factions to stage conflicts on film, cooking his data, and behaving as "a war criminal or even a genocidaire." The New Yorker ran Tierney's companion article the same month. Chagnon's career effectively ended before any serious investigation reached a verdict. But every serious charge eventually collapsed. The vaccine complied with WHO protocols. The measles epidemic predated Chagnon's arrival. Venezuelan physicians, the Rockefeller Foundation, the University of Michigan, the American Society of Human Genetics, and the U.S. Department of Health each investigated. Each reached the same verdict: no crime, no cover-up, no fraud. Jane Hill, who chaired the AAA's own inquiry, wrote privately that Tierney's book was "a piece of sleaze, that's all there is to it." The AAA task force issued its own report in 2002 anyway, condemning Chagnon for prioritizing his research over the Yanomamö. Raymond Hames had already resigned from the panel mid-inquiry, and Sarah Blaffer Hrdy, a National Academy of Sciences member, quit the AAA in protest. Three years later, the AAA membership voted to rescind the report. In 2012, Chagnon was elected to the National Academy of Sciences. The following year, Sahlins resigned from the Academy over it. The noble savage myth outlived the twentieth century's political movements. Today it powers the decolonial framework that dominates the humanities and much of political discourse. The claim is unchanged: violence, hierarchy, and inequality are artifacts of property, civilization, and colonization, and would vanish once those were abolished. Three decades of Chagnon's evidence showed the claim was wrong. In the absence of the institutions the utopians wanted to destroy, human beings behaved more violently than within them. The discipline that could not answer his data answered his character instead. That is what an intellectual monoculture does when evidence contradicts its premises. It goes after whoever brought the evidence."

Rock Solid on X - ">scene where the anime girls literally say “Merry Christmas”
>the localizer still writes out “Happy Holidays”
We literally do not hate Localizers enough"

Meme - "Concerns raised over access to UK Biobank data after 'race scientists' claims. Expert says any suggestion of Human Diversity Foundation accessing sensitive data could affect public trust in science"
Psychic intelligence officer Carl Jenkins from Starship Troopers touching NPC (as bug): "IT'S AFRAID"
They're afraid of the truth getting out and the public finding out "the science" was a lie. Of course those who expose the truth are the villains and not those who politicise science

Meme - *Chart showing transatlantic slave trade flows*
*Most going to Brazil, then the Arabian Peninsula, then the Caribbean, then North Africa, then the India Ocean*
*Tiny Minority going to the US labelled evil racism*

Meme - *2 old men in Black Flag and Minor Threat t-shirts*
Old Man 1: "What Turned Punk Rock Into Retarded Marxist Bullshit?"
Old Man 2: "CONSUMERISM. PRETTY IRONIC, HUH?"
3 young punks with Antifa, BLM, Communist hammer and sickle, Red star, RAN, ACAB, Eat the Rich logos, black leather jackers and blue/purple hair, pimples, piercings and partially shaved heads thinking: "CONFORMITY IS REBELLION"

Nathan Roberts on X - "Everyone needs to do reading on the “Rural Purge” of the 60’s and 70’s Almost every TV show highlighting rural, family friendly life was cancelled almost overnight, despite extremely high ratings. Why? Because television executives HATED everything they stood for-Portraying rural, Christian, white, heterosexual families and towns as happy and idyllic. Instead, they preferred to show dysfunction, filth, and confusion. It worked."

Denying the English ethnicity exists does nothing for social cohesion - spiked - "Whether Englishness is an ethnicity or a national identity has been a hot topic online for months. How did we get here? There is no doubt that England has experienced massive forms of cultural and demographic change in recent times. When I was growing up in the 1990s and 2000s, the question of who was English was not at the forefront of British political discourse. Immigration levels were relatively low and while society was diversifying, it was doing so slowly. At that point, there was not a single city or town where the white British ethnic group was in the minority... Coming from an academic background and specialising in social cohesion, I believe that a denial of a titular ethnicity in England is not only unhelpful for community relations – it is also absurd and historically illiterate. The English date back to the Germanic tribes, such as Angles, Saxons, Jutes and Frisians, who settled in southern Britain and fused with the somewhat ‘Romanised’ Celtic Britons who had inhabited England since at least the Iron Age. These ethnic groups came collectively to be known as the Anglo-Saxons. The unification of their kingdoms under Athelstan created the sovereign state of England in 927 AD. The Anglo-Saxons forged England’s cultural, linguistic, institutional and economic development. England’s history as an established nation did not start in 1945. Nor is it a land of immigrants the way that the United States is. Anyone peddling such divisive myths is not doing the country any favours. This is not to say that Englishness should be viewed in purely racial and ancestral terms. There can be room for a civic and cultural English identity that people from different walks of life can integrate into. This should be centred on English traditions, history, ritual and custom – on personal liberty, politeness and a strong sense of fair play. We should celebrate integration success stories – where ethnic-minority people feel a deep sense of pride in being culturally attached to England and are steeped in the nation’s traditional civic life. But all of this should sit under an overarching recognition that there is an ethnic English majority. Surely, there must be one, because without it there would be no ethnic minorities?"

The Imperial War Museum is ashamed of Britain’s heroes - spiked - "The Imperial War Museum in London was founded on 5 March 1917, during the First World War. Its purpose was to ensure that the ‘efforts and sacrifices’ of soldiers from Britain and the Empire would not be lost to posterity. Today, the very same institution is abandoning this pledge. ‘Contemporary audiences’, we are told by a consultancy firm hired by the museum, no longer relate to the sacrifices of those who fought in the First and Second World Wars. As a result, the Imperial War Museum will focus on conflicts ‘within many of our visitors’ living memory’. Apparently, the heroism shown by the people of Britain in the great struggles of the 20th century has little relevance for the young. Why? Because it happened in the past. A report published to justify the rebrand draws attention to a ‘growing number of people with no connection to someone who lived through the First or Second World Wars’. It seems that those running the Imperial War Museum don’t understand what the purpose of a museum is. Visitors to the British Museum don’t have a living connection to the Elgin Marbles, the Bayeux Tapestry or the Rosetta Stone. Does that mean that these objects should be sent into storage and replaced with a decommissioned train from the London Underground? Present-day objects from ‘living memory’ are not what people go to history museums to see. The fact that many of us no longer have a direct connection with those who fought in the First and Second World Wars is the very reason why the Imperial War Museum is necessary. It is particularly important because so much of what they achieved continues to live on in our world, although we are apt to forget it. The museum is there to preserve this connection, not sever it. It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the main motive driving this rebranding exercise is an aversion to the values that informed the museum’s founding; namely, valour, courage and patriotism. It has been evident for some time that these values have lost their meaning in the eyes of the museum’s management. The fact that those running a war museum are unable to grasp that peoples and nations go to war for a reason – to fight for something – underpins their approach to their museum’s own collections. This clearly drove its decision in 2014 to rid the museum’s atrium of serious military hardware. This exhibition, which included tanks, planes, guns and a Polaris missile – all located at the heart of the museum – had to go because apparently the management did not wish to ‘glamourise’ war. Last year, the museum shut down the Lord Ashcroft Gallery, which held the world’s largest collection of Victoria Crosses. The decision to rid the museum of its impressive collection of Victoria Crosses makes perfect sense for an institution committed to de-militarising its exhibits. After all, the Victoria Cross is the highest and most prestigious award in the British decorations system, given to those who have demonstrated ‘extreme bravery in the presence of the enemy’. For the Imperial War Museum’s management, the values symbolised by the Victoria Cross are anathema. But then this is hardly a surprise. Britain’s cultural elites as a whole all tend to see courage, patriotism and other military virtues as deeply unattractive. From their standpoint, the indifference of young people to the great wars of the early 20th century is positive. It shows that Britain is leaving behind a past they deem shameful. Indeed, it’s a past they have waged a war on, mainly through the education system. Schools and universities constantly warn young people to be wary of taking pride in their nation’s history. Moreover, they are told that many of Britain’s historical heroes – such as Winston Churchill – were not only deeply flawed characters, but hardly better than war criminals. It should not come as a shock that a recent survey showed that just six per cent of the public would fight for Britain if it faced an imminent invasion. Torn away from the achievements of their ancestors, it is not surprising that many young people find little meaning in their national story. Rather than seeing this detachment from the past as a problem, a serious museum would do its best to cultivate a sense of historical continuity. Instead of patronising young people with ‘relevant’ and ‘accessible’ exhibits, the Imperial War Museum should challenge them to take their nation’s story seriously."
Left wingers keep going on about "empathy", but believe that people have none. They certainly don't

Meme - Hot Takes Nobody Asked For: "she is a bishop in the united methodist church."
"WE ARE ALL MUSLIMS"

Charlie Walsham on X - "It was really interesting listening to Christine Ockrent on Radio 4’s 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑾𝒐𝒓𝒍𝒅 𝒂𝒕 𝑶𝒏𝒆 this lunchtime. Ockrent, one of France’s best-known broadcasters, said of the street protests there: “You have the Hamas factor, which indeed is playing in all our democracies, and even in the UK, where you have had huge demonstrations, and violent ones. And we are on the eve of the October the 7th anniversaries of the massacres in Israel. And so I think the Hamas factor has politicised this very young generation.” Sarah Montague interrupted: “You say the Hamas factor. Do you mean the pro-Palestinian factor, which is how I think it would be characterised here?” Ockrent replied: “Yes, you’re correct, but it’s factual to say the pro-Hamas, and that is fairly obvious in the various organisations that are supporting these movements.” Montague was, of course, doing her job by challenging Ockrent’s assertion. But Ockrent touched on an extremely uncomfortable truth that I don’t think the BBC, much of the progressive left or indeed large parts of the political establishment have remotely come to terms with. We have a radicalised generation of young people who have been fed a succession of ideological orthodoxies and encouraged to regard them not as arguments to be tested, but as moral truths that only bad people question. Gender identity is supposedly more meaningful than biological reality. Israel is supposedly the most evil country on earth. Western civilisation is uniquely wicked. Colonialism explains almost everything. And in the ugliest manifestation of this worldview, Hamas terrorists who murdered, raped and kidnapped civilians can somehow be recast as brave anti-colonial “resistance fighters”. No, obviously not every young person believes this nonsense. But enough do for it to have become a serious cultural and political phenomenon. And changing demographics in Britain and France are plainly part of this story. It is ridiculous to pretend otherwise. Countries can absorb enormous demographic change only if there remains sufficient agreement about the values, laws and institutions holding the country together. Importing millions of people from societies with radically different religious, cultural and political assumptions was always going to have consequences. The idea that everybody would simply arrive, adopt the prevailing liberal democratic consensus and that nothing fundamental would change was itself a kind of utopianism. Use your eyes and ears. Look at what is happening on the streets of European cities. Listen to what people are chanting. Look at the flags. Look at the glorification of people and movements whose values are profoundly hostile to the liberal societies in which their supporters are demonstrating. It is no good pretending this isn’t happening because acknowledging it makes people uncomfortable. We have a clash of cultures playing itself out on the streets of Europe. We also have a clash of realities between generations - although the insanity is certainly not confined to the young, as the Green Party has demonstrated spectacularly this week. And I see remarkably little evidence that any of this is going to improve. The question is how much worse things have to get before politicians of every political hue acknowledge the obvious: a nation cannot indefinitely function as a collection of mutually antagonistic identity groups occupying the same geographical space. Countries need borders, yes. But they also need a shared conception of citizenship. Shared institutions. Shared obligations. Shared democratic norms. And enough common values for people of radically different backgrounds to regard one another as members of the same national community. Multiculturalism without integration eventually becomes fragmentation. And when a society loses the things that bind it together, we shouldn’t be surprised when it starts coming apart."

Tyson Zahner | Facebook - "If you spend any time discussing politics or culture with progressives online, you've probably noticed a frustrating pattern. It usually doesn’t matter how much data you present, or how many facts, or how much evidence. You can walk through airtight logic step by step. But if any of that is irrefutable or uncomfortable to them, their feelings override it all. They stop arguing the topic and start diagnosing you:
"You're not willing to listen."
"You need to educate yourself."
"You have a blind spot."
"You just want to prove your point."
Thomas Sowell explained this decades ago in The Vision of the Anointed. He observed that progressives don't see political disagreements as debates between people weighing evidence and trade-offs differently. They see them as contests between the enlightened and the ignorant, the virtuous and the malevolent. If you disagree, there are only two possible explanations in their framework: you don't understand, or you don't care. The possibility that you fully understood their argument and still concluded they were wrong simply doesn't exist in their mental model. That's why the phrases are so predictable (and so common from topic to topic and even person to person). They aren't arguments. They're diagnoses. You aren't someone who examined all the evidence and simply came to a different conclusion. No, you're a patient exhibiting symptoms of ignorance or hatred. Jonathan Haidt (a progressive, himself) actually tested this. In his excellent book, The Righteous Mind, he surveyed thousands of Americans across the political spectrum and asked them to answer moral questions as if they were their political opponents. Conservatives and moderates consistently predicted how liberals would answer. Liberals were the worst at predicting how conservatives think. And the way they failed was pretty revealing. They overwhelmingly assumed conservative positions were driven by selfishness, cruelty, or ignorance rather than by genuinely different moral priorities. In other words, conservatives understand the left's arguments. The left usually cannot even accurately describe the right's arguments. And yet they're the ones telling us to "educate ourselves." Once you understand this framework, their phrases start to translate themselves:
• "Educate yourself" means "Read the sources I agree with until you reach my conclusion."
• "You just want to prove your point" means "Your facts are dismantling my position and I need you to stop."
• "You're not willing to listen" means "How could anyone possibly disagree with me or see the world differently than I do?”
• "You have a blind spot" means "I can't find your error, but you must be wrong because you disagree with me."
• "You don't want to understand" means "In my framework, understanding and agreement are the same thing."
• "It's not my job to educate you" means "I don't have a counterargument but I need to exit without admitting that."
Notice what every single one of these phrases has in common. Not one of them is an argument. Not one presents evidence. Not one identifies a specific factual error. They all treat your disagreement as a symptom to be explained rather than a position to be engaged. Which is why I’ve found the fastest way to cut through this is to simply ask one short question that forces them to apply their own standard consistently. For example, when someone called me a bigot yesterday for criticizing Islamic ideology, all I had to ask was: "Is it also bigotry to criticize Christian nationalism?" And he disappeared. He had no other choice… He either had to apply his own definition of bigotry consistently and say yes (which means he and everyone he agrees with needs to stop doing it). Or he has to say no, which means his standard is selectively applied, or go silent, which tells the audience everything they need to know. Now I want to be clear. I'm not saying every progressive engages this way. I’ve engaged with plenty of people on the left who can engage honestly and substantively. But this pattern is common enough, and predictable enough, that two of the most respected social scientists in the country (Haidt, being a progressive himself) wrote entire books about it. So if you find yourself frustrated by these kinds of responses, just recognize, they’re designed to frustrate you. These phrases don't exist to advance a conversation. They exist to end one. They give the person using them permission to walk away feeling morally superior without ever having to address the substance of what you said. Listen, I'm 100% open to having my mind changed. Bring me evidence I haven't seen. Show me data that contradicts what I've presented. Point out a logical flaw I missed. I'll engage it seriously. But telling me I need to "educate myself" as your mic drop moment before you exit (all because I weighed your argument against the evidence and found it wanting) isn't a counterargument. It's just a way for you to pretend to be superior as you surrender."
Left wingers who boast about how much "empathy" they have have no idea why people might disagree with them

Mary Pezzulo on X - "Christian Twitter really thinks that portraying Christ as a carnivorous beast with notoriously smelly urine who sleeps 23 hours a day and steals meat from hyaenas is beautiful sacred art, but having Christ portrayed by a woman is sacrilege. That's their opinion of women."
Coffee-Art-Moomin James on X - "Aslan isn't literally a biological lion. He's the socratic ideal of what a lion represents to 20th century British children. This is actually what a lack of media literacy looks like"
"Media literacy" just means pushing the left wing agenda

Police were lectured about Farage in Islamophobia talk - "Police officers were lectured about Nigel Farage in a publicly funded talk about Islamophobia, The Telegraph can reveal. Officers at a hate crime conference attended training sessions that compared the Reform UK leader’s opinions, specifically his doubts about young Muslims’ ability to subscribe to British values, to a racially aggravated offence. The North Yorkshire Police officers were asked to consider the “harm” done by Mr Farage, and then told that the politician would be “locked up” if he were similarly critical of Jewish people. The lecture was part of a training programme titled Project Unity, which The Telegraph understands has also been presented to students, council staff and civil servants responsible for the counter-extremism Prevent programme. It also took issue with criticism of pro-Palestine “hate marches” levelled by “people like Suella Braverman and Robert Jenrick” – both Reform MPs – and concerns about Muslim integration raised by Matthew Goodwin, a former Reform parliamentary candidate. Police have been repeatedly criticised for failing to adopt a sufficiently robust stance on Islamism and anti-Semitic abuse. Last week, Policy Exchange, a Right-wing think tank, revealed that the National Association of Muslim Police had published papers defending Hamas and describing terms such as “Islamist” as Islamophobic. The Project Unity training was delivered by Abbas Najib, a former police officer and now the chief executive of Better Communities Bradford, a charity. Since 2019, the charity has received £490,000 in public funding from the National Lottery Communities Fund, including a £35,000 grant to roll out Project Unity, which covers training sessions that include “media and political narratives” and “myths and misconceptions about Islam”... Attendees were shown a 2024 interview with Mr Farage in which he warned that “growing numbers of people do not subscribe to British values”, going on to say that this cohort included Muslims and attendees of pro-Palestine marches in London. The Reform leader then cited a survey published by the Henry Jackson Society that found 46 per cent of British Muslims supported Hamas. After that, attendees were asked to “think about the relationship” between Mr Farage’s statements and a hate crime offence that took place in 2024. They were shown footage of a man racially abusing a Muslim bus driver. They were then told to “draw your own conclusions” about the Reform leader, and asked to “think about whether this commentary has any influence on something like this”... The lecture made the case that Muslim values are compatible with British values, in particular the official list pulled together under David Cameron’s government, which included a belief in democracy, the rule of law, respect and tolerance, and individual liberty. Written material that accompanied the training also claimed that women were not oppressed by the stipulations of Islam. The session also said pro-Palestine marches were “protesting genocide”, and Mr Najib complained that they were labelled “hate marches” by “mainstream, high-profile politicians” such as “Suella Braverman and Robert Jenrick, Michael Gove”. One of Mr Jenrick’s most prominent interventions about the issue came before his defection to Reform. Then in the Conservative Party, Mr Jenrick raised concerns about members of Hizb ut-Tahrir, a group that hopes to establish a global caliphate, chanting “jihad, jihad” close to one of the marches in 2023... The training also defended immigration more broadly, and claimed that “Muslims, the immigrant, the brown person” were scapegoated for a flatlining economy, when it was in fact “the rich”. The training – which is targeted at authorities handling hate crimes and counter-radicalisation – can be revealed after concern about the application of the law by police forces across the UK. Earlier this year, Stephen Gray, a retired police officer, was fined for sharing posts online that were critical of Islam."
If you criticise Hamas, that's anti-Muslim hatred and you need to be jailed
Left wingers mock people who call the UK a Muslim state, even though they have blasphemy laws for Islam and politicians court the Muslim vote

David J Harris Jr on X - "🚨BREAKING: A retired British police officer has been convicted and fined for sharing a meme. The post said: “Fun facts about bacon! People who eat bacon have a lower chance of marrying a 9-year-old!” Stephen Gray, 65, spent 30 years as a police officer. He said the meme was satirical and meant to spark debate about child marriage. A judge ruled it “grossly offensive.” He now has a criminal record."
@realDianaWest on X - "Solzhenitsyn was a WWII Red Army soldier when Soviet authorities read a joke about Stalin in a letter he had written to a friend. Solzhenitsyn was arrested, stripped of his rank and sent to Gulag for 8 years. Are we there yet?"
When you live in a Muslim country, you can't make jokes referencing Islam

2001 Live on X - "In Peterborough, England, 17-year-old Ross Parker is murdered by a gang of 10 Muslim Pakistanis who were seeking a white male to attack."
rosbifenthusiast on X - "British Muslims work themselves into tearful histrionic frenzy about post 9/11 racism when the reality under Blair was endless indulgence and a desperate government and media effort to distract from cases like this"

Did I accidentally spark the “New #MeToo Movement”? (On Jane Doe and her Lawyer)

Death threats are good when they push the left wing agenda 

Did I accidentally spark the “New #MeToo Movement”?

Well, that’s what various media organs have been proclaiming in recent days. Hilariously.

So I guess I’ll take CNN, NYT, AFP, Reuters, and the German national broadcaster’s word for it, and hereby take credit for launching the New #MeToo Movement: #IamJaneDoe. Even though I prefer to call it the #ZombieEpstein Movement.

I apparently sparked this historic movement by doing what else — Tweeting. (Which also sparked MeToo back in the day, if memory serves, so I guess that bookends nicely.) What I tweeted was a crowd-sourced solicitation for info about the Cornell Jane Doe — a journalistic method that the NYT et al. use every single day. But me doing it in this instance has apparently changed the world forever. Lol.

Well, it worked, because I was able to journalistically verify the identity of Jane Doe, after talking to multiple people who knew her personally at Cornell and in her home town, and cross-checking this with court records, university records, sorority records, social media, and more, as well as conferring with various lawyers and fellow journalists. After publishing her identifying info on the night of October 1, I made the independent discretionary decision to take down the info shortly thereafter, not because it wasn’t 100% accurate as to Jane Doe’s identity, but because the objective I had sought to achieve had been achieved: contesting the totally fallacious, untenable premise that any sex-abuse claimant who gets thrown in a melodramatic civil action is entitled to enjoy perpetual media-bestowed anonymity, to assist in their lawyers’ sleazy tactical ploy to extract the largest possible settlement payouts. And which in the case of Cornell Jane Doe has now also triggered renewed criminal investigative activity, followed by the appointment of a Special Prosecutor — which only further strengthens the public imperative for transparency / disclosure. And then there’s the chorus of screeching politicians, NGO activists, corporate-backed “influencers,” and untold others who are out there demanding urgent legislative reforms based on the spectacular “gang rape” allegations promulgated by the anonymized complaint. Governor Kathy Hochul promptly rushed forth to endorse a punitive new “rape” law in the state of New York, to further enhance the ability of prosecutors to throw people in prison for rape stuff.

So the public interest in identifying the litigant who catalyzed all this couldn’t have been more obvious. But given the truly bonkers-level of intense vitriol around this matter, I did not want to bring any more negative attention to Jane Doe herself than was necessary, as I have no animus toward her as an individual, and wish her no harm whatsoever. I even communicated this to her directly over text on Thursday. SO I’LL REPEAT AGAIN: PLEASE DO NOT HARASS JANE DOE, HER FAMILY MEMBERS, OR ANYONE ELSE ASSOCIATED WITH HER.

Meanwhile, I’m still getting deluged with literally thousands of these “I am Jane Doe” missives, such that it would be impossible to actually read through them all, much as I would love to. Here’s one I just picked out at random...

Sandra’s message is comparatively quite mild, which I greatly appreciate. Many, many others threaten me with brutally extreme violence, such as gang rape — curiously enough — as well as murder and so on. I guess these are the fruits of the new “movement” I hilariously spawned? I don’t know, you tell me — I’m not the one who proclaimed the movement’s existence! Though yes, I’ve seen a small sample of the thousands and thousands of videos posted by women, mostly to TikTok and Instagram, in which they stare at one of my Tweets...

Typically these videos are set to the same musical score, “LABOUR” by Paris Paloma, which is a legitimately genius song I hadn’t heard before, and is now dangerously stuck in my head. So I guess that’s one upside to this whole fracas!

Another bemusement is that to underscore how journalistically anathema I am for seeking to publish information plainly in the public interest, Big Kahunas like the NYT are describing me as anything but a “journalist” — since that would ascribe me with far too much Seriousness. So instead, I am a mere “political commentator,” according to today’s important NYT update from John Leland and Emma Goldberg. This despite the NYT describing me before as a “journalist” — but, you know, whatever. USA Today says I’m a “content creator,” which I would rather gouge my eyes out than ever earnestly self-describe as. AFP says I’m simply “a man named Michael Tracey,” which I’ll admit is very funny. NJ Dot Com curses me with the title of “podcaster” — perhaps the one thing that could actually drive me to suicide, unlike the tsunami of “kill yourself” emails currently clogging my inbox. Reuters was at least gracious enough to go with “journalist,” which I so deeply appreciate. I actually just did an interview for “Reuters TV,” and it was fair/reasonable. Not sure when or if it’s coming out.

Alaina Demopoulos of The Guardian continues the subtle derogatory fun, though, and declares me a “content creator and commentator.” By which, of course, she not-so-subtly means I have forfeited my Serious Journalist Card, as I have defied “decades of established journalistic norms for reporting on alleged rape victims.” From whence do these purported “norms” arise, Alaina? Certainly not American law, since in 1971, a television reporter in Georgia reported the name of an alleged rape victim, the alleged victim sued, and eventually the Supreme Court held in Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn (1975) that any state action to prohibit or punish the publication of such information was patently unconstitutional. To the extent that media institutions choose to abide by certain self-censorship “norms,” that’s a function of ideology — namely, their dogmatic adherence to the idea that anyone who ever claims any kind of sexual victimization, and wishes for their identity to not be made public, will have their wishes eternally granted by pliable journalists. Rather than scrutinize whether these demands for secrecy have merit, or are tied to allegations with any credible substantiation, journalists instead have a sacred duty to take all secrecy demands at 100% face value, 100% of the time, and enforce a totally optional prohibition on transparency and disclosure. Even if the anonymized allegations have been orchestrated by skeevy plaintiff’s lawyers to castigate others, BY NAME OF COURSE, as perpetrators of the most heinous, reputation-destroying crimes — such as, say, “gang rape.” And subsequently use this media-enabled anonymity as leverage to extract maximum settlement $ from their well-endowed litigation targets. Don’t take my word for it, though: this is the explicitly-advertised business model of Thomas Giuffra, lawyer for Cornell Jane Doe, as found on his own website.

“Most abuse cases settle, and what a survivor is offered in a settlement depends heavily on whether the institution across the table believes the case will actually be tried if it isn’t resolved,” Giuffra writes, in hopes of soliciting new clients and therefore, of course, big-money business for himself. The idea being: if you hire Giuffra, the entities or individuals you sue will have such fear struck in their hearts, given his sterling reputation in the field and track record of success, that they will be highly incentivized to settle forthwith, and for a very generous sum. “Mr. Giuffra has recovered over $250 million on behalf of survivors of sexual abuse and sex trafficking, including a $14 million trafficking settlement,” Giuffra adds, apparently speaking in the third-person, and under a website URL that is as follows:

https://survivorsofabuseny.com/epstein-maxwell-survivor-lawyer-ny/

Which is a little too on the nose, even for me. Are you enjoying the #ZombieEpstein era yet?

I’m trying to figure out which alleged “Epstein Survivors” Giuffra actually represented, if any, and in what precise litigation. He claims explicitly to have had Epstein-related clients at some point, but I can’t find any evidence of this in the court dockets...

Whereas there’s plentiful evidence of his settlement-seeking pursuits in relation to Harvey Weinstein, Sean “Diddy” Combs, etc. So who knows. You can’t take a single thing this guy says or does at face value — he could just be bullshitting to juice Google searches. But his firm still has dedicated pages up to specifically solicit Epstein/Maxwell-related claimants, teasing salacious speculative “newsy” lawsuit hooks like “Trump’s & Clinton’s Possible Connections” [sic] and “Epstein’s Fascination with Transhumanism & Control.” He also posted a blog post of some kind under his own byline in August 2020, titled “Chasing Jeffrey Epstein Beyond the Grave,” which heralds a particularly demented suit brought in New York State by another notorious huckster firm, Merson Law, purporting to represent a slew of “Jane Does” against Epstein’s estate. 

“Jane Doe XIV,” for instance, claims that “in or about 1978, and continuing for a period of time thereafter” — when this strategically anonymized litigant “was approximately thirteen years old” — “Epstein sexually assaulted, abused, battered and raped her multiple times.” There’s not a shred of evidence anywhere amongst the now-millions of publicly-available “Epstein Files” that our favorite deceased financier raped a 13-year-old domiciled in Tennessee in 1978, when he would’ve been 25 years old. Even to go all the way back to the 1970s shows Merson, applauded by Giuffra, had zero scruples about who they were enticing to throw spaghetti at the wall adorned with dollar signs. It could have easily just been another straight-up mentally ill person who never met Epstein, and maybe hallucinated something decades later, but who could still be instrumentalized by these money-grubbing lawyer syndicates to manufacture big paydays. Made all the more possible by their demands for strict anonymity, which severely limited the ability of anyone, including opposing counsel, to evaluate the claimants for bare-minimum veracity.

It’s unclear precisely what happened with these mystery Jane Does circa 2020, but a bunch of their claims ended up getting “discontinued with prejudice,” such as “Jane Doe XVII” from Missouri (???), who claimed some sort of “abuse” in 2001-2002, when “she was approximately 25 years old.” She remains comfortably anonymized, to the best of my knowledge, since her claims were dropped on November 11, 2020. Unfortunately, the lawyers for the Epstein Estate were known to settle with any wackadoodle accuser, so it’s possible the minders for this allegedly adult-victimized claimant just pivoted to some other means of financial extraction. More claims were dropped when the judge finally ruled, on April 5, 2021, that the previously operative confidentiality order was “unduly burdensome,” as the Epstein estate lawyers were supposed to be producing a “key that contains the true names and identifying information for [identified] individuals,” and the sweeping anonymity requirements then in effect would “disturb defendants’ factfinding attempts.” Subsequent to this, a bunch of the Jane Does seem to have transitioned over to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program, which preserved stringent anonymity. So, that probably means not one, but two Tennessee-based Jane Does who claimed to have been viciously raped by Epstein as young teens in the 1970s and 1980s, despite zero known evidence that Epstein ever even set foot in the state of Tennessee, got their sought-after monetary reward, with the Giuffra-allied lawyers of course receiving a handsome cut.

So that’s the big Epstein Survivor claim Giuffra was promoting in 2020; I would love to ask him which claimant(s) he’s represented individually, as he boasts of doing on his website. Because I’m very confident the answer would be an absolute hoot. I’m likewise very confident he was adamant about preserving any and all anonymity privileges related to these theoretical clients, ideally till the end of time, because otherwise the whole exercise would almost certainly look extremely silly, even to the most true-believing “trauma-informed” victim advocates.

By 2024, Giuffra took a detour into making stuff up about Sean “Diddy” Combs, coupled with a big media tour very similar to the one he’s currently on with respect to Cornell Jane Doe. The prior tour was to hype up the lawsuits he brought on behalf of three anonymous (male!) clients who were accusing Diddy of “rape,” and demanding that their anonymity be preserved forevermore. Giuffra’s demands for anonymization have since been rebuked over and over again by the presiding judges in these cases, and the once-anonymous Diddy claimants have been judicially “doxxed,” to use the now-popular parlance. Feel free to search “Louis Reed” AND “Diddy” for additional information.

As illustrated above, Giuffra’s desperate attempts to keep secret the identity of his Diddy Rape Accusers have been repeatedly rejected, because it’s been ruled that asserting “generic claims” of potential “physical and psychological harm,” or “embarrassment,” is wholly insufficient to override the public’s presumptive interest in transparency in the legal system. Ding ding ding.

Also see these related rulings from Judge Lewis J. Liman...

Something tells me soon enough, the “movement” I allegedly sparked is not going to be happy with how things pan out. But I will always be grateful for the role I allegedly played in this historic moment. Thank you.

#IamJaneDoe

#NoYoureNot

(Don’t miss this joyful phone call I had last night with an especially passionate “Jane Doe” supporter. There’s plenty more where that came from!)

 

Links - 10th October 2026 (1)

With the Firefox phone redesign, you can no longer share/export/bookmark your tabs en masse : r/firefox - "That post wasn't the whole story, fortunately. You can use a Browser Console script to extract (back up) the Synced tabs to a bookmarks.html-style file without opening the tabs. See:
https://gist.github.com/jscher2000/b7094b3e74b95e5ba9c26f1f685bda6e
You can open that file in a new window and open the tabs from the list when needed. The odds of needing them all at once is low."
A solution to "share all tabs" on Firefox Android being removed

Meme - "Why does gambit only have those 2 fingers covered? *Gambit with third and fourth fingers covered* *pleased Rogue fluffing hair*"

Meme - autocorrect2.0 @autocorrect2_0: "Many atheist fantasies about God involve Him liking them better. Proving again it's a pride issue"
The Thinking Atheist @ThinkingA...: God to angel while looking at earth: "I'm starting to prefer the ones who don't believe in me."

Meme - Mike Layne @MikeLayne: "I miss dumb products. And I mean that as a compliment. The dumb coffee maker made coffee. The dumb TV turned on. The dumb washing machine washed clothes. Now everything is smart enough to stop working for no reason. Progress is weird."

Charles Gasparino on X - "Living in Manhattan, I know a lot of old-school NY Dems and not a day goes by that they express how theyre horrified by what is happening to their party. My advice: Look inward. It began with you and people you love and elected like Chuck Schumer, Andrew Cuomo, etc., the so-called moderate party leadership that for years appeased the leftist loons who occupied Zuccotti Park, or unqualified clowns like AOC, or de Blasio. You and your "leaders" never really tried to hold the line against the leftists in the state legislature. And now the lunatics are controlling the proverbial insane asylum. We have increasing fiscal and social chaos. Mamdani's budget is not balanced and will never be. It will require more tax increases. He's never going to stop demonizing Israel, or come to appreciate free markets as Jamie Dimon hopes, because he is who he is. With that, homelessness and urinating on the street has become a right, along with rioting after basketball games. It's not just Mamdani. You have Brad Lander touting Marxism; a comptroller, the so-called fiscal watchdog named Mark Levine who is placating the left and not signaling the disaster that brewing on the city's books. Remember that when you piss and moan about Trump; your lives are being destroyed not by his mean tweets but right here in NY by politicians you empowered. You have become piggy banks for an expanded welfare state and useful idiots to promote cultural Marxism at the private schools you think will help your kids get into Columbia to further their indoctrination. Good job"

I saw how Islamists took over our prisons, before I fought one with a narwhal tusk - "The latest figures highlighting the rise in white Muslim prisoners do not surprise me. Over the 16 years I spent in prison, I watched the situation developing first-hand.  In March 2016, I was leaning against the top-floor balcony of C Wing at HMP Gartree when five prisoners came marching up the stairs. One stopped beside me as a lookout. The other four went directly into the cell of another Muslim prisoner and gave him a sustained beating.  His alleged offence was throwing a Quran in a bin. What struck me most was not simply the violence. Four of the five attackers had converted to Islam while in prison.  Prisoners of course have the same right as anybody else to adopt a faith, and I saw religion provide genuine purpose during my sentence. But when conversion becomes associated with violence, intimidation, protection or criminal power, it is legitimate to ask a more difficult question: what exactly has someone converted to?... I entered the high-security prison system at Frankland in late 2006. Over the following years, I watched Islamist terrorists and extremists arrive in increasing numbers and reshape the prison culture.  In the prison hierarchy I knew, the gangster and armed robber were near the top, the sex offender or child killer near the bottom. A frightened prisoner arriving on a wing quickly learns where influence lies, who sells drugs and who is capable of hurting him.  For some prisoners, conversion could therefore offer something more immediate than spiritual enlightenment: a new identity, belonging and, crucially, protection from one of the most feared networks across the prison estate, the “brotherhood”, as it was informally known. That was particularly powerful for prisoners traditionally at the bottom. In Islamic teaching, conversion marks a new beginning and past sins can be forgiven. Inside prison, that had a practical consequence. A man previously despised for his offence could suddenly find acceptance, protection and a new status, so long as he followed the group’s “rules”. In a world governed by violence and predatory behaviour, that is a powerful draw. Some men were undoubtedly sincere converts. Others converted out of fear or simply for an easier time. Some, I suspect, saw an opportunity to increase their influence or give old violent traits a new justification. Motives can overlap: a man may seek protection and later acquire sincere beliefs; another may adopt religious language while continuing to deal drugs or intimidate others.   Today’s figures therefore need careful interpretation. The disproportionate number of white Muslims in prison does not on its own prove coercion, still less extremism. But official reviews have repeatedly identified aggressive conversion, intimidation and Islamist gang activity, providing official confirmation of the wider pattern I witnessed first-hand. Ian Acheson’s 2016 review warned that Islamist ideology could operate in prisons as a struggle for power and dominance, exploiting weakness in legitimate authority.  Separation centres were subsequently created to remove the most influential extremists from the mainstream estate. Jonathan Hall KC, in his review Terrorism in Prisons, later found that the centres had “never fully taken off” and their use had declined. He warned that simply moving influential prisoners around the estate merely transferred the problem, and urged His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service to make more effective use of separation. Separation is essential, of course, but it cannot solve everything. By the time a radicaliser is removed, his influence may already have spread. Ideas travel more easily than prisoners.  Nor does the danger necessarily stop at the prison gate. Sudesh Amman, who stabbed two people in Streatham days after his release in 2020, had retained a radicalised mindset in custody. Hall recorded that he held influence among prisoners at Belmarsh and had been involved in attempts to convert others. Usman Khan’s prison history was more troubling still. He was repeatedly associated with extremist bullying, preaching and attempts to radicalise other prisoners. In November 2019, while I was attending a Learning Together event on day release at Fishmongers’ Hall, he murdered Jack Merritt and Saskia Jones. I confronted him with a narwhal tusk and later helped bring him down on London Bridge before armed police shot him dead. I cannot prove what was happening inside Khan’s mind. But I believe his prison experience reinforced rather than challenged his world-view. A man surrounded by people who share or admire his extremism has little reason to question it.  That is my greatest concern about the rise in conversions. The issue is not how many prisoners become Muslims, but whether overstretched prisons can distinguish sincere faith from coercive recruitment and spot when vulnerable men are being drawn into something darker. Overcrowding, drugs, violence and shortages of experienced officers make that harder. When legitimate authority weakens, informal authority fills the space. In the places where prison authority is weakest, fear, faith and belonging can be exploited by those offering protection, status and certainty."
Time to jail Steven Gallant for anti-Muslim hatred!

Asian communities told ‘wash rice less’ in water-saving push - "  Asian and Muslim communities have been told to wash their rice and feet less in a water-saving push.  Ofwat, the water industry regulator, has been criticised for funding “bizarre” guidance targeting ethnic minority households.  It used £270,000 of billpayers’ money for a research initiative that used a celebrity chef to teach Southeast Asians how to cook and wash rice with less water. Muslims were also encouraged to use only a litre of water when performing ritual ablutions known as “wudu” before prayer.  As part of an ongoing water-saving scheme, the project was led by South Staffordshire Water, which worked on developing “water-saving behavioural change campaigns within faith and diverse communities” by targeting “excessive” washing of food by some cultures.

Dame Jenni Murray died after crash caused by dazzling headlights

Meme - Matthias Schmidt: "Found a list of baby names on my wife's phone. She even rated them. I guess she doesn't want a daughter!"
"1. Thomas 7/10
2. Jonas 10/10 *squirt x2*
3. Sebastian 4/10 not great
4. LUkas 9/10
5. Matthias 3/10
6. Omar + Karim 12/10 best experience
7. Yusuf anl 8/10
8. Jamal 9/10 just insane
9. Jamal jr. 10/10
10. Dominik 2/10 terribleeee
11. Mohammed 8/10
12. Christoph 6/10
13. Niklas 8/10
14 Stefan 1/10"

TIL the botched restoration nicknamed "Monkey Christ" was deemed more culturally relevant than the original painting and preserved as-is. Tens of thousands of tourists visit the Spanish town of Borja every year to see it, and the restorer became a local celebrity until her passing in late 2025. : r/todayilearned

Meme - Mia: "My grandma's little apricot doodle puppies were born this week"
Darren: "Putting them on a metal rack is wild - for a second I thought I was looking at some crispy fried chicken"

Edward Norton Says He Hates the Romanticization of “The Idea Of Being On The Spectrum.” | Thought Catalog - "“You get all these people who are just basically assholes, wanting to credit that to them being on the spectrum,” he says. “It’s like, you’re not on the spectrum. Shut up, shut up, like, you know, stop it. Don’t casually write off your bad behavior. And also don’t casually try to claim it as a superpower, [when] for a lot of people is a real thing.”  The through-line of his complaint: Silicon Valley romanticized autism into a quirky advantage, and now anyone rude gets to hide behind it while people with profound autism get erased from the conversation...   The video got a boost when it was reposted by @lifewithsevereautism, an account run by Tiffany, whose 14-year-old son Gunner is nonverbal and profoundly autistic. Her caption: “Yes!!!! Thank you!” The framing Norton is pushing back on traces to a 2001 Wired piece by Steve Silberman called “The Geek Syndrome,” which linked elevated autism diagnoses in tech-worker families to traits that helped in coding. That article, and later the neurodiversity movement, helped shift autism from stigma toward “different, not less,” and eventually into the “superpower” language now common on TikTok and in corporate hiring decks.   Parents of children with profound autism — the subset with high support needs, co-occurring intellectual disability, and often no speech — have spent years arguing that the palatable version of the spectrum is squeezing them out of funding, research, and public sympathy."
Time for more "awareness" about mental health

Man who took Hamilton bus on joy ride 'did a great job' driving, left no dings, say police - "A man took a Hamilton city bus on a joy ride Tuesday — with passengers still on board, say police.  At about 9 p.m., a bus driver parked at the downtown MacNab Bus Terminal and left for a short break... A 36-year-old man of no fixed address boarded the bus, sat down in the driver's seat and drove away, up to the Mountain.  The bus was an extra long "articulated" model — meaning it had an accordion-like attachment joining the first vehicle to the second vehicle, said police spokesperson Trevor McKenna in an interview.  The man made several stops along the way, allowing passengers to get on and off at bus stops. At roughly any time, 10 passengers were on the bus, McKenna said.  "There was not a ding on the bus. He did a great job," said McKenna. "It's comical but at the same time it's serious. We're thankful nobody was hurt."... At first, passengers didn't realize the man wasn't a bus driver, McKenna said. But when he started making some wrong turns, they started asking him questions and one gave him directions to return to the scheduled route.  "He even went as far as to deny someone looking to board with an expired bus pass," police said in the news release. Police "strategically" followed the bus, "mindful of the potential risk to public safety," they said.  Officers worked with Hamilton Street Railway, and accessed the bus's GPS, to know where it was going, McKenna said. They kept their sirens off.  "We didn't want to spook him," he said. "We didn't want to make this a tragedy."  When it stopped on West 5th Street, about 15 minutes later, the man was taken into custody without incident.  He was charged with theft over $5,000, possession over $5,000, obstruct police and drive while prohibited. McKenna said they didn't release the man's name because there may be "a mental health component.""

Meme - Tel @telmudic: "Even in school the math students tended to know more about the humanities than the humanities students."
Cicada Meth Orgy Fungus @RogueWPA: ""Rich nerds are philistines" is cope.  Zuckerberg knows Latin and Greek. Andreessen gave an hour long interview about his love of the humanities. Peter Thiel is devoted to his philosopher mentor, writes for intellectual magazines, and has *taught* multiple liberal arts classes."

Meme - nomadgeist @nomadgeist: "Run clubs have already been burned down by horny dudes looking for alternatives to dating apps, the migration to pilates and yoga classes has begun"
Carlisle @CarlisleDiana: "multiple straight men in my Pilates class this morning"

Morbid Knowledge on X - "In 2025, 24-year-old Chinese influencer Jiang Xiaorou smashed a Guanyin statue in an “anti-superstition” challenge, declaring, “Let’s see how long I can live.” She died in a car crash almost one year later."

So me and my bros wanted to once and for all test the hypothesis that we are all living in a matrix. : r/copypasta - "So me and my bros wanted to once and for all test the hypothesis that we are all living in a matrix. We came to the conclusion that a matrix could only run so smoothly because of our predictable behaviour. For example, if you eat it is likely that you swallow your food. Therefore, the matrix would be ready to initiate a digestion program. But if a group of people did something unpredictable, the matrix would shut down.  So what we did is we randomly started gang banging each other. The matrix could have never predicted that because that is like super gay. But nothing happened (matrix-wise).  But this is not point why am I writing about this. My friends now want to do the gang-banging shit again and I am not sure how to respond to that."

Robert Spencer on X - "Michigan: Muslim cleric says ‘We will build America on the basis of moral civilization and Islam’
Leftist politicians keep insisting that when their Muslim allies talk about Sharia, they’re talking only about private religious law, not about a political system they’re working to impose on the United States. And then along comes someone such as Ibrahim Yassine to let the cat out of the bag.
Read more at the link in the next post."

Woman loses thousands of dollars to romance scammer posing as astronaut in distress, police in Japan say - "A Japanese octogenarian was swindled out of thousands of dollars after falling in love online with a self-described astronaut who sought her help to avert a spaceship crisis... the scammer one day told her he was "in space on a spaceship right now" but was "under attack and in need of oxygen," the official said.  The scammer then urged her to pay him online to help him buy oxygen, and successfully hoodwinked around 1 million yen ($6,700) out of her... Japan has the world's second-oldest population after tiny Monaco, according to the World Bank, and older people frequently fall prey to various forms of organized fraud.  These include the classic "it's me" scam, where perpetrators impersonate family members in trouble to extract money from the victim.  Elderly people can also be cajoled into using ATMs to get non-existent "refunds" of their insurance premiums or pensions, police have warned.  Romance scammers drain billions of dollars from people seeking love, and their tactics have evolved in sinister ways in the online age. More than 64,000 Americans were taken for over $1 billion in romance scams in 2023 — double the $500 million just four years earlier, according to the Federal Trade Commission.  About half of people who are using dating sites say they've come across somebody who's tried to scam them"

Trad West | Facebook - "“Turn the other cheek” does not mean Christians are commanded to become passive in the face of evil. Fr. Chad Ripperger recently addressed a misunderstanding that has become widespread among Christians: “We’re conditioned to actually believe that when Christ said turn the other cheek, that we just let people get away with whatever they want. And that’s not actually the case.” He continued: “We have an obligation to stand up and to protect the glory of Christ Himself” Christ commanded us to forgive our enemies. But forgiveness is not the same thing as pretending evil does not exist, allowing injustice to continue, or refusing to defend what is good. Jesus Himself publicly rebuked hypocrisy and commanded His disciples to correct those who sin. Christian charity sometimes requires this precisely because allowing someone to continue in evil can harm both them and others. St. Thomas Aquinas likewise distinguished between loving and forgiving a person and always granting them the external effects of forgiveness when doing so would encourage further wrongdoing — the distinction Ripperger was discussing. Christian meekness is not cowardice. You can forgive without surrendering truth. You can love your enemy without permitting evil. You can seek peace while still defending the innocent, the Faith and the honor due to Christ. Turn the other cheek does not mean bow before evil."

Michael Shellenberger on X - "Over the last decade, most of us experienced Hillary Clinton’s email server, the Trump-Russia collusion investigation, and Hunter Biden’s laptop as separate, unrelated controversies.  The FBI opened Midyear Exam, its investigation of Clinton’s private server, which held evidence of influence-peddling, in July 2015. One year later, then-Director James Comey closed it with a press conference, calling her “extremely careless” but recommending no charges; he did so without advising the Department of Justice, which was unusual and inappropriate.  Twenty-six days later, on July 31, 2016, the Bureau opened Crossfire Hurricane, a full counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign. Special Counsel John Durham concluded in 2023 that neither the FBI nor the intelligence community “appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.”  Finally, in December 2019, an FBI field office took possession of Hunter Biden’s laptop hard drive, and in October 2020, Twitter and Facebook suppressed the New York Post story about it after FBI warnings of a Russian “hack and leak.”  The news media covered each episode as its own drama with its own unique cast of characters, and framed each incident in such a way so that the very idea that the FBI was abusing its powers lay outside of the Overton window. The media covered the email server as much ado about nothing, at best, and Clinton’s recklessness, at worst. The media framed the Russia story as a case of Trump’s conflicts of interest, at best, and Putin’s direct control of him, at worst. And the laptop story was, at best, about Republican persecution of an innocent man and, at worst, about Hunter Biden’s reckless behavior.  In every case, the media framed FBI officials as, at best, dogged investigators and, at worst, overzealous. Outside of openly pro-Trump right-wing media, few journalists covered the stories as the FBI abusing their powers for partisan reasons.  But it is now clear that a single thread ran through all three investigations, and it was one of partisan FBI agents and officials abusing their power in ways as extreme as J. Edgar Hoover did in the 1960s...."

Dan Burmawi on X - "When an ideology makes the promise of sex with multiple virgins part of your eternal reward, it is inevitable that the sexual ethic produced by that ideology to be distorted, degrading, and abusive.
Here is how Islam describes paradise: The Islamic afterlife is a carnal, male-centered fantasy of unlimited sexual gratification. A single intercourse with one of the virgins of paradise will last seventy thousand years. Islamic texts describe these women as perpetual virgins, untouched, and designed solely for the pleasure of men.
“Indeed, We have produced the women of Paradise in a [new] creation. And made them virgins, devoted [to their husbands] and of equal age.” (Quran 56:35-37)
“Fair ones reserved in pavilions. Untouched before by any man or jinn.” (Quran 55:72-74)
Hadith collections affirm that after every act of intercourse, these “virgins” miraculously return to a state of virginity so the process can be repeated endlessly.
These heavenly beings are not just virgins, they are physically exaggerated to fulfill male fantasies:
Large, round breasts:“Indeed, for the pious there is a triumph… full-breasted companions of equal age.” (Quran 78:31-33) The Arabic term kawa‘ib in 78:33 literally means “firm, swelling breasts.”
Big, lustrous eyes:“They will have maidens with intensely white skin and large black eyes, as if they were hidden pearls.” (Quran 52:20)
Glowing, hairless, smooth skin:“If one of the women of paradise were to appear to the people of the earth, she would fill the space between heaven and earth with light and fragrance.” (Tirmidhi, 2538)
Muhammad explicitly stated that men in paradise will have endless sexual stamina, never experiencing fatigue. The virgins, in turn, never get tired, never say no, and are always ready for intercourse.
The Prophet was asked, “O Messenger of Allah, do we have sexual intercourse in Paradise?” He replied: “Yes, by the One in Whose Hand is my soul, a man will have sexual intercourse with a hundred virgins in one morning.” (Ibn Majah, 4337) Another hadith states that men will be given the strength of 100 men in sexual performance. (Tirmidhi, 2536)
According to Al-Suyuti, a famous Islamic scholar:
“The believer will be given such and such strength in paradise for intercourse… A single intercourse with one of the virgins of paradise will last seventy thousand years.” (Al-Suyuti, Al-Haba’ik fi Akhbar al-Mala’ik)
These “virgins” don’t need to poop, pee, or sweat, they exist for one purpose: eternal male pleasure.
“They will neither urinate, defecate, nor suffer from phlegm or mucus. Their sweat will be musk.” (Muslim, 2834)
“They will be hairless except for their eyebrows and eyelashes.” (Tirmidhi, 2536)
A believer doesn’t get just one virgin, he gets dozens, or even hundreds.
“A martyr will have 72 virgins.” (Tirmidhi, 1663)
“The lowest rank of a person in paradise will have 80,000 servants and 72 wives.” (Ibn Majah, 4337)
While men are promised an endless supply of sex slaves, the fate of women in Islam’s paradise is nonexistent or humiliating. Women in Islamic eschatology exist only for men’s pleasure, nothing else. While other religions speak of enlightenment, unity with God, or transcendent joy, Islam offers a pornographic fantasy land where men indulge in endless sex, alcohol, and servitude. What kind of God rewards faithfulness with an eternal orgy? What kind of religion reduces the afterlife to a hypersexualized playground? This is not spiritual. This is not divine. This is the theology of a man who designed an afterlife to justify his own sexual obsessions. And yet, Muslims claim Islam is the most moral and pure religion. Islam’s paradise is nothing more than a cosmic brothel."
Islam is the most feminist religion indeed

Meme - "What are you doing?"
"Playing with the fellows... Found one of your kraken tentacle minis in the closet... *tentacle dildo with miniatures*"
"Babe... u still there???"

Inconvenient Truths — Jennifer Zeng Reports on X - "t.co/J1IZxcC9Od🤫Who says CCP China has lost its ability to innovate?Behold, a brand-new industry: the “charging girl” (充电媛).The business model is apparently simple: a guy pulls in at night to charge his EV. The battery needs an hour. So while the car gets charged, the driver can get… “charged” too.Now that’s what you call a full-service charging station."

Polymarket on X - "JUST IN: Multiple world leaders have reportedly fallen ill, after attending BRICS summit in India."

In The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002), the Battle of Helm's Deep happens on a stormy night. Yet, you don't have to increase your screen's brightness. This is because films back then knew how to effectively use lighting. : r/shittymoviedetails

My racehorse isn’t named after Hitler, insists US owner - "An American racehorse owner has insisted that his two-year-old colt is not named after Adolf Hitler.  Scott Herbertson, an owner and breeder, named his horse Austrian Painter, which he said was a tribute to Gustav Klimt, his wife’s favourite artist.  Yet the name is also a codeword for the Nazi führer – in reference to his failed career as an artist in Vienna – that is used in the murkier corners of the internet to bypass content filters.  Mr Herbertson, a 58-year-old Californian who now lives in Texas, had submitted some alternative names for the horse, including My Struggle and Braunau Star, Horse Racing Nation reported.  Hitler’s autobiography was called Mein Kampf, which translates to My Struggle, and he was born in Braunau, Austria. But Mr Herbertson said his wife’s grandfather had been born in Braunau. The Jockey Club in the US said that the name Austrian Painter broke rules banning offensive names, and that the horse would now be called Merrylegs instead... the name of the horse’s sister, which was previously called New Order, be changed as well. That horse currently has no name.  New Order was a term used by the Nazis for their vision of a pan-German racial state built by, and for, an Aryan master race.  Mr Herbertson said it was a reference to his favourite band, New Order.  The Manchester group was formed by the remaining members of Joy Division in 1980 after the death of Ian Curtis, the group’s lead singer. It is best known for hits such as Blue Monday, Temptation, and World In Motion.  New Order, the band, has always denied that its name is a Nazi reference. However, the name Joy Division was a reference to sex slave wings in Nazi concentration camps, which featured in House of Dolls, a novel published in 1955."

German town bans Holocaust memorial stones - "Heidenau, near Dresden, voted to ban any new Stolpersteine, or stumbling stones – memorial plaques set into the pavement to commemorate ordinary victims of the Nazi regime – from being placed.  The plaques, the size of a small cobblestone, are set at locations significant to those being remembered, usually their former residence... the hard-Right Alternative for Germany (AfD) and the centre-Right Christian Democrats (CDU) in Heidenau’s city council claim that it is disrespectful to the dead to have “passers-by walking over or even stepping onto the names of the victims”.  The same argument was previously made by Charlotte Knobloch, president of the Jewish Community of Munich, leading the Bavarian city to ban Stolpersteine on public property, opting instead for memorials at eye level.  Ms Knobloch however rejects Heidenau’s decision, claiming to be appalled that the CDU “would stoop to supporting such a transparent manoeuvre by the extremists of the AfD”."
Clearly the Jews are in league with the far right and need to be expelled
If the AfD says the earth is round, that means it's flat

‘Englishmen better off dead’ graffiti sprayed in Bournemouth - "Anti-English graffiti has appeared in several public places in the seaside town of Bournemouth.  Spray-painted messages written in Spanish and translating to “dead Englishmen” and “s----y English better off dead” were left on the walls of public areas in the Boscombe suburb.  The resort town is a popular destination for Spanish students, with more than 40 language schools in the area.  Bournemouth also has three migrant hotels, including one in Boscombe.  Three months ago, an offensive message reading “s--t Englishmen better off dead” was sprayed onto a wall in the area before being removed by the council... Martin Houlden, the chairman of Reform UK Bournemouth, said: “One incident could perhaps be dismissed as the work of an idiot with a spray can.  “When the same anti-English hatred starts appearing repeatedly across Bournemouth, it becomes rather harder to shrug off.  “If whoever is responsible really finds the English this objectionable, choosing to spend their time living among us seems an unusual lifestyle choice. There are, after all, many other places to be.”  In recent months, anti-Semitic messages and swastikas were spray-painted on the walls of a Bournemouth suburb with a large Jewish population."
Time to ban Reform and Restore to stop racist graffiti

The animal rights nuts want to ban your woolly jumper. There’s just one problem - "Winter is on its way. And so, like many other people in this country, especially pensioners, you may be feeling worried about the extortionate cost of your heating bills. Still, not to panic. You can always try to keep warm by putting on a nice woolly jumper, can’t you?  Sorry, but no. I’m afraid you can’t. Because a bunch of animal rights activists have apparently decided that wearing wool is every bit as evil as wearing fur.  If you don’t believe me, look at the protests that have taken place at both New York Fashion Week and London Fashion Week – with supporters of Peta (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) storming the catwalks, armed with placards that read “DITCH WOOL” and “WOOL IS BLOODY CRUEL”.  You may be thinking: “But hang on a second. What’s wrong with wool? You don’t have to kill a sheep in order to shear it.” In the eyes of the protesters, however, such an attitude is grossly insensitive, because, as their placards make clear, “SHEEP SUFFER”.  In which case, it would seem that our farmers must face yet another crushing blow. As if it weren’t already hard enough for them to make a living these days, now they’ve got nutters telling them that they shouldn’t be allowed to sell their sheep’s wool.  I don’t suppose there’s much use pointing out that, if it weren’t for farmers, there would be quite a lot fewer sheep in the world – because farmers ensure that their sheep are well fed, help deliver their young and call the vet when they’re sick. Which means that sheep enjoy rather better, safer and longer lives than they would if they were forced to survive in the wild.  But maybe that thought hasn’t occurred to the protesters. Or maybe it has but they think: “Of course we want farmers to keep looking after their sheep. We just don’t want them to make any money from them.” A heartwarming thought. But I fear I can spot a slight flaw in it."
Not to mention sheep need shearing and if you don't, they can die

Cllr Sophie Preston-Hall ECC Rochford North on X - "If history makes us uncomfortable, should we erase it — or should we learn from it? 🤔  I’ve always been a huge fan of Horrible Histories. It brought history to life for children by making it funny, gruesome, ridiculous and, at times, uncomfortable. That was rather the point — history itself can be horrible.  Now, with some Horrible Histories material apparently no longer available or edited on BBC iPlayer, I think there’s a much bigger conversation to be had.  I’ve been obsessed with history since childhood. I spent part of my childhood living with my grandparents at Wolf Hall Manor, the ancestral home of Jane Seymour. You don’t get much more brutal than Henry VIII and the treatment of his wives!  History contains slavery, persecution, war, cruelty and appalling treatment of women and minorities. We absolutely should discuss how those subjects are portrayed, particularly to children. But should uncomfortable history simply disappear?  For me, we learn from history — we don’t erase it.  Put warnings on programmes. Add context. Explain why attitudes have changed. Encourage discussion. But let children learn how different the world once was and, crucially, why we never want to go backwards.  What do you think? Contextualise it, edit it, or remove it altogether?  #HorribleHistories #History #BBC #Education #LearnFromHistory #BritishHistory #Tudors #FreeSpeech #Debate"

Links - 9th October 2026 (2 - Palestine/Middle East Peace)

TrendingPolitics.ca on X - "''I did not blame Jews for the actions of the Israeli government'' NDP leader @avilewis rejects claims he blamed the Jewish community for Israel's actions, after a Yom Kippur post saying Jews "failed to do our part" in stopping the Gaza war."
annanimiddy on X - "Again, there's no way to reconcile his narcissistic "not in my name" with "I'm not responsible," and now he's getting hoisted on his own petard. He needed to virtue signal his complicity to be accepted by the equity card holders who wouldn't have accepted a rich, white Jewish leader who failed to render his garments to their satisfaction.  There is no violin small enough. Sometimes, a leader and the movement so richly deserve each other."
Maspeek on X - "Jewish people collectively have not done enough to stop a genocide AND I am not holding them collectively responsible at all, that would be antisemitic.🤔 Contradicts himself within 30 seconds."
annanimiddy on X - "There's no way out for him. All these guys have to prove how they're actually the good Jews is bashing Israel, so they can't let other Jews off the hook for being morally inferior to them."
Good luck if you say Muslims need to condemn Islamist terrorism

Avi Lewis on X - "The shooting outside a synagogue in Belleville is deeply upsetting, and has traumatized a community that gathered to pray.  It is yet another reminder of the work that remains to create a Canada that is truly safe for people of all faiths, including Jewish people – to worship, to come together, to live without fear.  Today, I am sending love and solidarity to the Jewish community in Belleville and across the country on this Yom Kippur, the most solemn and holiest day of the year."
Jesse Brown on X - "You cannot declare that Canadian Jews have "collectively caused harm" by "failing to stop a genocide" and then act surprised and upset when maniacs hold Jews to blame for exactly that. You share responsibility for this crime, @avilewis"

'Palestinian Rachel Dolezal' outed as white woman of 'significant privilege and wealth' - "A woke anti-Israel teacher and activist who claimed to be part black and Arab has been dubbed the “Palestinian Rachel Dolezal” after she was outed as being a white, Jewish woman who hid her privileged identity as she led antisemitic protests.   Hannah Gann, a Philadelphia teacher, was forced to confess she was a “white woman of significant privilege and wealth” after fellow lefty activists grew suspicious of her background and confronted her... Gann has been a ringleader for anti-Israel protests based in the Philadelphia public schools, according to a local watchdog group, who branded “Philadelphia’s Leading Antisemite” on a mobile billboard parked outside the school where she worked...   “I watched her sudden transformation after she returned to Philly from the Peace Corps [in Rwanda]. She was clearly making herself look darker using makeup and fake tan, and speaking using [African American Vernacular English],” the classmate said.  In one video from December 2025, the activist teacher wears a keffiyeh and has a “blaccent,” which she did not use in per apology post...   The LARPing activist frequently referenced family in Palestine, including a grandfather who was revealed to have been born in Baltimore, the Inquirer reported, citing a document compiled by the Philly Palestine Coalition (PPC).  The PPC said that as “a teacher of predominately black youth, [Gann] has gained the trust of young people on the basis of a sense of shared oppression. She has served as a mentor to at least one young white person, who was manipulated by Hannah on the basis of a fake identity. “Her access to vulnerable young people, especially black youth, is deeply concerning, given her pattern of lying and manipulation,” the PPC added.  She also successfully solicited money by claiming she was broke because of sending cash to her relatives in Palestine, according to the PPC. In reality, much of her family still lives in Israel, according to the Inquirer.  She also grew up in remarkable privelege. Her father is a noted tax lawyer who previously worked for the Treasury Department and her $1.8 million family home is in Falls Church, Virginia — the second wealthiest suburb in the nation.  Gann also appeared to bolster claims about her race with subtle disguises – critics accused her of wearing bronzer and other makeup to appear darker, along with donning golden hoop earrings and clawed acrylic fingernails.   Gann also spoke with what stunned critics called a “blaccent” which was audible across her numerous preachy Instagram videos where she lectured about racism and imperialism, all from her supposedly personal experience.  But those affectations were gone in her apology video – no accents and no black lingo to be heard. Her hoop earrings, however remained.  And a listen back at her old videos after the truth was exposed seemed to make her fraud obvious, as she appeared to weave in and out of her affected accent — sometimes sentence by sentence.   The race-faker was outed after a showdown with members of two local activist groups — the Racial Justice Organizing Committee and Philly Educators for Palestine... Gann, who was listed in materials for a 2024 West Philly “teach-in” on “scholasticide” in Gaza as a Palestinian-American, also stunningly admitted that she even hid her pro-Palestinian activism from her family in order to keep living the lie.   “I hid the truth or outright lied about my background to everyone in my life,” she said, adding that the deception included her own family.  Gann arrogantly confessed she “allowed half-truths and obfuscations to grow into outright lies” because she “genuinely wanted to commit to the work I was doing.”... while Gann’s position was not nearly as prominent as Dolezal’s, it was shocking nevertheless in her West Philadelphia community – where she was such a prominent anti-Israel voice that her activism was documented by multiple antisemitism watchdog groups.  A box truck drove around her neighborhood in 2024 calling her: “Hannah Gann: 10th grade teacher and Philadelphia’s leading antisemite” – and it was paired with a photo of her screaming at a 2023 anti-Israel rally.  That rally was dubbed “pro-Hamas” by another antisemitism awareness group, Canary Mission, which posted footage of Gann helping lead the rally just weeks after Hamas terrorists killed more than 1,200 people in their Oct. 7 attack on Israel.   “I know every martyr’s life is precious,” Gann said the rally, evoking the term Hamas uses to describe its dead killers.  “When a Palestinian child picks of a rock or a slingshot in the face of Israeli tanks or machine guns, we owe them that same energy,” she screamed to a cheering crowd. “We owe them to take it to these streets and f–k the police until Palestine is free.”  That rally was held outside a Jewish bakery.  Other alarming acts included Gann saying a Jewish teacher — who complained about classroom banners calling for Israel’s destruction — was “lying and playing the victim,” along with her joking about firebombing Jewish-owned business.  Gann, who teaches at the Workshop School, a project-based Philadelphia School District high school, also defended Keziah Ridgeway, a fellow Philadelphia teacher the school district disciplined for private, pro-Palestinian social media posts."
Left wingers love to larp as the oppressed, because they know victim culture rewards "victimhood" and "oppression"

 Rafael Medoff | Facebook - "THE TERRORIST WAS THE VICTIM —AND THE VICTIM DIDN’T EXIST
Neria Leiter, the son of Israel’s ambassador to Washington, was severely wounded this week by a Palestinian Arab terrorist who rammed his car into the vehicle in which Leiter was a passenger. Soldiers on the scene killed the terrorist.  But here’s how the Palestinian Authority’s official news agency, Wafa, reported the news:   “Israeli occupation forces on Wednesday shot dead a Palestinian near Beit Ur al-Tahta village, west of Ramallah, according to the Health Ministry. The Ministry announced that the gun-toting Israeli soldiers opened fire at vehicle near the village, killing 29-year-old Mahmoud Mohammad Suleiman.”  While decent people around the world are praying for the recovery of the latest Jewish victim of Palestinian Arab terrorism, Palestinian Arabs are being told by their government that the terrorist actually was an innocent victim of “gun-toting” Israelis—and Neria Leiter doesn’t even exist.  In Washington yesterday, Ambassador Leiter—whose son Moshe was killed by terrorists in Gaza in 2023—spoke of Palestinian Arab terror as “the unimaginable reality we have been living with in Israel.”  Part of what makes it so unimaginable is that a regime which signed a peace agreement with Israel thirty-three years ago justifies the terrorism, erases the Jewish victims, and rewards the terrorists.  In accordance with its Pay-for-Slay policy, the PA will reward Mahmoud Suleiman’s family with an initial payment of 6,000 shekels (about $2,000), followed by a monthly payment of 1,400 shekels ($461) for the rest of their lives. That’s nearly half the average monthly salary of residents of the PA-governed areas.  Is it any wonder that so many Israelis doubt the Palestinian Authority is sincerely interested in peace?"

Palestinian journalist Rula Jebreal calls Hakeem Jeffries an ‘AIPAC monkey’ — claims she didn’t mean it in a ‘racist way’ - "Palestinian journalist Rula Jebreal took heat from black lawmakers Friday after she referred to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) as an “AIPAC monkey.”... Ali interjected to note that using the term “monkey” has “terrible racial connotations … but I think you caught yourself and said you didn’t mean it with any racial animosity.”   Jabreal attempted to clarify: “There are these three monkeys – one, I cannot hear, I cannot see, I cannot speak – it reminds me of these three monkeys.”   The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) rejected Jebreal’s defense.   “To be clear, there isn’t a non-racist way to call Leader Jeffries—a Black man—a ‘monkey’ or ‘errand boy’”...   Rep, Ritchie Torres (D-NY) similarly argued in an X post that “calling a Black man a ‘monkey’ is racist. Full stop.”  “If Wajahat Ali and Rula Jebreal were on the far right, no one on the far left would have any trouble condemning them for dehumanizing a Black man in racist terms,” the black congressman added. “The silence is deafening.”  Jebreal later issued a backhanded apology on X.   “I am disgusted and horrified that Hakeem Jeffries is taking money from AIPAC amidst Israel’s genocide in Palestine,” she wrote. “That said, a term that I used to describe him was inappropriate and offensive and should never have been used.  “I apologize unconditionally.”"

David Bernstein on X - "You have to wonder about the mental stability and acuity of people who spent much of their adolescence and young adulthood insisting that climate change was going to wipe out life as we know, and that this was the single, most important issue of our lifetimes and... despite this not being resolved, switched their life focus to being apologists for hamas."
The left wing agenda is all connected

Pensioner receives police payout over ‘thought crime’ tweet - "A retired special constable has been given compensation of £20,000 after being wrongly arrested over a social media post warning about rising anti-Semitism.  Julian Foulkes, from Gillingham, Kent, was handcuffed at his home by six officers after replying to a pro-Palestinian activist on X.  Kent Police officers searched his home and commented on his “very Brexity” book collection. The force detained the 71-year-old for eight hours, interrogated and issued him with a caution after officers visited his home on Nov 2 2023.  Earlier this month, Kent Police confirmed that the caution was a mistake and had been deleted from Mr Foulkes’s record. Tim Smith, the force’s chief constable, later phoned Mr Foulkes personally to offer an apology for the “ordeal he endured”.  Now, in a letter sent to Mr Foulkes’ solicitors, the force reiterated Mr Smith’s apology for the “distress caused by the actions of his officers” .  It also confirmed Kent Police would agree to an out-of-court settlement after Mr Foulkes launched a legal challenge, supported by the Free Speech Union (FSU), against the force for wrongful arrest and detention... Police body-worn camera footage captured officers scrutinising Mr Foulkes’s collection of books by authors such as Douglas Murray, a Telegraph contributor, and issues of The Spectator, pointing to what they described as “very Brexity things”.  Mr Foulkes’s X post replied to an activist threatening to sue Suella Braverman, the home secretary at the time, for calling pro-Palestinian demonstrations in London “hate marches”.  In the post, sent two days before police visited his home, Mr Foulkes wrote: “One step away from storming Heathrow looking for Jewish arrivals…”  Mr Foulkes’s X post was referring to news reports of an anti-Semitic mob that stormed an airport in Dagestan, Russia, looking for Jewish passengers. On Nov 2, six officers arrived at Mr Foulkes’s home, armed with batons and pepper spray. He was arrested, fingerprinted, photographed and swabbed for DNA.  After his home was searched, the retired special constable was locked in a police cell for eight hours and interrogated on suspicion of malicious communications.  Fearing that further escalation could impact his ability to visit his daughter, who lives in Australia, he accepted a caution despite having committed no offence... Mr Philp also called on the Government to support his proposed amendment to Labour’s Crime and Policing Bill, and “abolish non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs)”.  The amendment will seek to block police forces keeping records on individuals who have not broken the law but are accused of expressing views or behaviour deemed offensive."
Terrorism supporters still claim the UK is a Zionist colony because they're not free to attack Jews in public or attack people with sledgehammers

Emily Schrader - אמילי שריידר امیلی شریدر on X - "For years, Israel was accused of “targeting journalists” in Gaza. Now Al Jazeera has fired 24 Gaza-based staff amid a US lawsuit alleging ties and support by the Qatari network to Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad"
Mark R. Levin on X - "You mean these “ journalists” were terrorists or tied to terrorists?   Will we hear this in most of our media as they preach about journalism freedom?"
Clearly, Al-Jazeera is controlled by "Zionists" too

Meme - The Greasy Walrus of Monte Cristo: "Meet Kathryn Tagseth, member of the Ontario College of Teachers. Complaint filed with @OCT_OEEO three months ago. Zero action taken."
K. Tagseth: "Jewish fiction. The bible was written by Jews for Jews. None of it is true. Their jealous, controlling god was created in their image. No perfect god would choose such defective, inbred, inhuman specimens of humanity. The mistake called Israel is really part of Palestine."
Of course, we know she meant "Zionists"

Meme - "Netta. 32. Woman. Bisexual. 19 miles away. 3 shared desires
Israeli visiting NYC. Very into the idea of meeting pro-Palestine partners who'd enjoy turning that tension into something physical, playful, and consensually humiliating."

Palestine Action activists ‘attacked guards with kebab skewers’ - "Palestine Action activists armed with “large kebab skewers” attacked security guards during a break-in at an Israel-linked weapons manufacturer, a court has heard.  Qesser Zuhrah, 21, Zahra Farooque, 26, Kamran Ahmed, 29, Heba Muraisi, 31, and Liam Mullany, 34, went on trial at Woolwich Crown Court on Friday charged with criminal damage and violent disorder over the break-in in the early hours of Aug 6, 2024. The court heard that a security guard suffered a 4cm laceration to his head after being attacked at an Elbit Systems site in Filton near Bristol. The firm’s parent company is based in Israel and manufactures defence technology equipment, including drones. The five defendants are accused of being part of a “black team”, wearing black jumpsuits, whose role was to overwhelm security guards so a “red team”, wearing red jumpsuits, “could break into the factory and start smashing up property”. Opening the trial, Deanna Heer KC, the prosecutor, said: “The black team did that by threatening, intimidating and, if necessary, assaulting the guards by throwing fireworks at them, brandishing weapons such as whips and hammers and large metal kebab skewers.”  Ms Heer added: “The attack was carefully planned, not only had the premises been targeted in advance, but willing participants had been identified and a step-by-step plan of action devised and agreed upon. Everyone taking part knew what their role was and what was required.”  Footage of the break-in, shown to jurors, appeared to show black team members lighting fireworks and flares and firing them at security guards, while others cracked whips and raised kebab skewers as they swore and shouted at guards to “back off”... The prosecutor said Nigel Shaw, a security guard, had suffered the laceration to his head after being struck by members of the black team, who all wore masks... All five defendants deny charges of criminal damage and violent disorder."
Clearly, it was self-defence, like the sledgehammer. Why are Zionists so terrified of accountability?!
When left wingers proclaim that people can't be masked, they mean people they disagree with

Police foil Yom Kippur terror plot in Manchester - "A spokesman for the CAA said: “For the second Yom Kippur running, Jews in Manchester have been targeted by terrorists.  “This year, the attack was foiled. But the attacks keep coming. That’s because essentially nothing has changed in law enforcement policy since this time last year.  “The Government has found plenty of time for signalling faux virtue on foreign policy but has yet to take the fight to Islamists and other extremists fuelling the life-and-death anti-Semitism crisis right here at home.”  The CAA said it was grateful to the authorities for their “vigilance”, but added: “The Jewish community cannot rely on that forever.”  “The authorities need to get lucky every time and the terrorists only once. Until the threat itself is confronted, British Jews will never be safe.”"
Damn Mossad!
Time to do more about Islamophobia

NHS consultant shared cartoon of Netanyahu operating Holocaust oven - "An NHS consultant shared a cartoon showing Benjamin Netanyahu pushing a coffin draped in a Palestinian flag into a Nazi concentration camp oven.  Dr Mazin Fageir, a senior trauma and orthopaedic surgeon and consultant at the Royal Free Hospital, London, shared the image in May 2021 of the Israeli prime minister operating an oven of the kind used during the Holocaust... The cartoon, which accentuates the Jewish leader’s ears and nose, was reportedly drawn by Vasco Gargalo, a Portuguese cartoonist... Dr Fageir, who remains registered with the UK General Medical Council (GMC), also responded to reports of a rocket hitting a house in Israel by saying: “Great news… May all the Palestinian rockets hit their targets, amen. Indeed Israeli terrorists will be wiped out one day and Palestine will be free.”  In 2021, the consultant wrote: “The two Jewish states in the history of mankind are of similar length, time wise, 70-75 years. The end of this terrorist state is nigh, very nigh indeed.” To mark the anniversary of 9/11 in 2024, he reposted an AI image of Orthodox Jewish men celebrating in front of the Twin Towers as a plane approaches.  The graphic refers to the debunked “dancing Israelis” conspiracy theory which claims Israeli men were seen standing on top of a delivery van in New Jersey high-fiving and smiling as the attack unfolded... In June, ministers accepted recommendations from Lord Mann, the Government’s anti-Semitism adviser, and recommended measures including mandatory anti-Semitism training and restrictions on political symbols.  However, the British Medical Association voted to oppose the recommendations and seek an “immediate pause”, warning of implications for freedom of expression."
Time to crack down on "far right" NHS members. Anyone waving a British flag must be fired

Magistrate said Jews are attacked ‘when Israel wants to divert attention’ - "A magistrate who suggested terror attacks on Jewish people in Britain were timed to divert attention from Israel has been reprimanded for serious misconduct.  Ansar Gulzar was disciplined after four of his Facebook posts were judged to have shown he “held a prejudicial view of matters involving Jewish people and Israel”.  The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) delivered the verdict after a campaign group complained about comments Mr Gulzar had made in the aftermath of an attack at a Manchester synagogue on Yom Kippur in which two people died.  On Oct 2, 2025, the day of the attack, Mr Gulzar wrote: “My thoughts and prayers are with the victims of Manchester. Every life matters. Question bothering me is why there is always an attack on a Jewish person when Israel wants to divert media attention?”  The JCIO judged that the comments had the “potential to cause emotional harm and undermine public confidence in the judiciary”. UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) said the statement advanced a conspiratorial narrative by suggesting that violence against Jewish people was connected to Israel seeking to manipulate media coverage.  In another of Mr Gulzar’s posts, from June 2025, he said: “America has a long & brutal history of slave trade. Africans were American slaves between 16th & 19th century. Americans are Israeli slaves from 19th century.”  A further post on Jan 17, 2026, was judged to have presented Israel as a uniquely manipulative force responsible for destabilising countries across the Middle East... Mr Gulzar, a member of the Buckinghamshire bench of magistrates, had also breached guidance on the use of social media, which advises judges and magistrates to avoid controversial social or political comment."
Clearly, Mossad is behind all of the attacks on Jews worldwide, so to keep Jews around the world safe, Israel must be destroyed

Ed Miliband’s silence on the crimes of Palestinians speaks volumes - "“We will never be silent about injustice,” Ed Miliband declared when he outlined new measures against Israel at the Labour Party conference earlier this week. But in truth Britain’s Foreign Secretary is rather partial about the injustices he chooses to be noisy about.  When the victims are citizens of the Jewish state, Miliband suddenly becomes cautious. Faced with an attempted mass killing of passengers on a Flydubai flight to Tel Aviv, he offered this bland statement: “Deeply concerned about the incident that occurred on the Flydubai flight to Israel.”  After all, it was only an apparent attempt to murder 174 people – not construction of new homes near the Dead Sea. He displayed no such caution in his speech to Labour conference. The Foreign Secretary paid lip service by condemning Hamas before clarifying that Israel is committing ethnic cleansing and war crimes. In practice, mentioning Hamas only made the situation worse: he equated the barbaric terrorist organisation with the state of Israel that was defending itself against it. It is true that Miliband did not remain silent when the Iranians slaughtered thousands of their own people in the streets. In fact, he spoke out loudly – but against any response.  It was he who, in the British cabinet meeting on the eve of the “Epic Fury” operation, is reported to have led the opposition to allowing the United States to use British military bases for attacks on the Ayatollah’s regime. Just last week, he held a friendly meeting at the UN with the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi,. Winston Churchill was lucky not to have a foreign secretary who met Joachim von Ribbentrop and prevented Roosevelt from using bases in London to prepare for D-Day. If Miliband truly believes that he “will never be silent in the face of injustice and suffering”, how does he continue to cultivate the Palestinian Authority, whose laws forbid the sale of land to Jews?... Did Miliband himself, with his immense sensitivity to human life, ever shout on the phone at the president of the Palestinian Authority over the law that allocates roughly 7 per cent of the PA’s budget to murderers of Jews, where the more you murder, the more you receive? Did he freeze aid budgets until the Palestinian education system in the West Bank stops, in the words of former Labour MP Joan Ryan, “teaching a curriculum which incites violence and terrorism and spreads anti-Semitism”?  There is an attempt at ethnic cleansing between the Jordan River and the sea, and it is by the Palestinians against the Jews. There is a fierce debate between Israel and Britain regarding the future of Judea and Samaria. This is a legitimate political debate. There is violence by Jewish extremists against Palestinians in the West Bank. This is a despicable phenomenon, although even in the West Bank it is not the worst instance of violence. Palestinian terrorist organisations try to murder Israelis every single day, yet Miliband hardly bothers to condemn it. Labour has – in practice if not in rhetoric – consistently acted to preserve Hamas’s rule in Gaza even after the atrocities of October 7. They have done this by demanding time and again for the war to stop before the terrorist organisation has been eliminated. Now, it is doing its best to establish a terror state five minutes away from Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. It is no wonder that no government formed in Israel after October’s elections, no matter how Left-wing it may be, will be able to allow the establishment of such a state. When it slaughters Jews, Miliband is sure to do his best to prevent Israel from fighting it. If someone got their news on world events exclusively from the British Foreign Secretary’s X account, they might think that the greatest evil empire in the world is Israel, followed – after a massive gap – by Russia, Iran, and perhaps North Korea. The reason for this assault on the Jewish state is political: the strengthening of the Green Party with its fiercely “anti-Zionist” platform. That is why the campaign against Israel has ratcheted up with the arrival of party conference season. Miliband will run every red light on his way to stopping the Greens. If Labour were led by the successors of Harold Wilson, Tony Blair, and Gordon Brown, it would be busy moving toward the centre and caring for the average Briton. It would be busy eradicating the anti-Semitism spreading throughout Britain, and would do all in its power to ensure the four independent “pro-Gaza” MPs elected in 2024 would be defeated at the next election.  But the current Labour Party is the heir of Jeremy Corbyn. Its current stance should require the party to apologise for expelling him from its ranks: today, there are very many Corbyns within Labour’s ranks.  Miliband is not the first Jew to joyfully point a false and accusing finger at his own people. If he comes to Jerusalem, he should watch out for heckling directed at him. If he went to Ramallah and didn’t have the security that goes with being Britain’s Foreign Secretary, as a Jew he would have to fear much worse."

Simone Rodan-Benzaquen on X - "The German Greens have officially distanced themselves from the Green Party of England and Wales over its "Zionism is Racism" resolution. translated: "This resolution contradicts the principles of the European Green Party (EGP), which is committed to a two-state solution and peaceful coexistence in Israel and Palestine. The resolution also runs counter to our convictions and core values as Bündnis 90/Die Grünen: we stand firmly for Israel's right to exist.. » The EGP brings together 39 independent Green parties. We welcome the fact that the GPEW will soon lose its voting rights in the European Green Party in any case.""

Jewish students at UK universities sent death threats - "The messages, which have been seen by The Telegraph, include: “calm yourself f----t Jew bag”, “I am gonna murder this racist p----k” and “tell me where he lives and where I can find it, leave it to me”... He added that individuals left sticky notes on his university corridor stating: “We are watching you Israeli” and we are “coming for the Israelis”. Mr Barstys is not Israeli, but Israeli students live on his corridor... Another testimony in the report was an incident at the University of Birmingham, where a kippah-wearing student and his housemates were reportedly followed home by four university-aged men.  The men allegedly climbed onto the railings outside his house and started shrieking: “Dirty Jews” and “Jews live here” to passers-by walking down the residential student hotspot of Selly Oak, according to the report... Bracha Jacobs, a Jewish student, claimed anti-Semitism had become normalised among students and “religious students expect to be heckled, harassed, and honked at in the street” while walking to and from campus”. She said Jewish students had been stopped and asked whether they “had any diamonds”, while walking home from a community Friday night dinner.  Jewish students have also been told to “go back to America,” “go back to Poland,” and “go back to Auschwitz” and have been identified by their so-called “Jewish noses” while out at bars and nightclubs in the city.  Another was told by a lecturer that their name was peculiar and “very Jewish”. They even suggested the student shorten it... At City St George’s, footage has emerged showing a student chanting in Arabic “Al Yahud Bara Bara” which translates to “Jew, get out! Get out!”"
It's all their fault for being "Zionists"!

Meme - "Omar and Hobbes by Darren Cullen
Omar: ISRAELI SOLDIERS APPROACHING! *Omar and Hobbes getting ready to sprint*
Omar: Charge! *Omar and Hobbes throw stones*
*Omar is shot in the head while Hobbes is a stuffed toy*"

Metropolitan Police on X - ""Just ban it" That was a common response to us urging students not to hold a pro-Palestine protest on Oct 7. We can't ban protests & can only ask the Home Sec to do so if the risk of serious disorder is so high that it can’t be managed by conditions. That's not the case here."
Janice Turner on X - "“We only ban a march when its opponents will be violent. We know Jews won’t kick off, so they have to tolerate a celebration of a recent Jewish massacre.” Violent bullies always win. What a way to police a city."

Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan on X - "90 years ago today, Oswald Mosley and his Blackshirts attempted to march through and intimidate a predominantly Jewish area of the East End.  Men, women and children, alongside local residents, trade unionists and anti-fascist protesters, came together to defend the community in what became known as the Battle of Cable Street.  They taught us an important lesson: communities can resist fascism by joining together.  Hate and antisemitism had no place in London then, and it has no place here now."
Queen Bee on X - "Interesting history lesson, Mayor. You left out one rather awkward detail:  Oswald Mosley was not some creature who appeared fully formed from the "political right". He had been a Labour MP, sat on Labour’s NEC and was a member of the Fabian Society before founding the British Union of Fascists.  Even George Bernard Shaw, one of the great Fabian luminaries, was still publicly praising Mosley in 1932, after the BUF had been founded.  Which does rather spoil the neat little morality tale in which fascism belonged exclusively to “the other side”.  History is considerably more inconvenient than a mayoral tweet.  We see you."
Patrick Christys on X - "We have literally imported an army of antisemites and then been called fascists for not wanting them here. Does Sadiq Khan have no shame?"
Heidi Bachram on X - "A Jew tried to join the Cable Street march today and because he’s a Zionist the ‘antiracists’ physically attacked him and dragged him out. I honestly don’t have words for how scary and disturbing antizionism is."
Left wingers only pretend to care about Jews when they can use that to shit on white people

Captain Allen on X - "Israel was never “given” to the Jews. And the Jews certainly never “stole” it.  They were already there. A continuous presence in Jerusalem, Hebron, Safed, and Tiberias ran through the Roman expulsions and the Crusader and Arab massacres. And in every century, some of the Jews who had been driven out came back.   Zionism did not invent that return. It accelerated it once pogroms in Europe and the Arab world made staying impossible and the United States shut its doors in 1924.  Centuries of neglect under Ottoman rule left the Land mostly arid desert and malaria swamps while being sparsely populated. Jews legally bought large tracts at premium prices from absentee Arab landlords in Beirut, Damascus, and Cairo. The rest was state land that passed from the collapsed Ottoman Empire to the British Mandate.  That Mandate was conferred at San Remo in 1920 and approved by the League of Nations in 1922 as a reconstitution of the Jewish national home and attached a duty to the British to facilitate immigration and close settlement. The 1939 White Paper broke it, and shut the gate on Jewish refugees in the years they were being slaughtered by Nazi bullets and gas in Europe.  The offers of a split came from everyone except the Arab leadership. The Zionist Congress accepted the Peel partition in 1937. The Jewish Agency accepted the UN partition in 1947. The Arab Higher Committee rejected both, and five Arab armies invaded in May 1948 after Israel declared independence and asked the Arabs who stayed to remain as citizens.   Arab Secretary General Azzam Pasha said the war against the Jews would be one of “extermination.”  The country that survived that war was not handed over in a ceremony and not taken from an empty map. It was defended by the people the international agreement had already named, after the other side chose a war over a border."
Minorities only deserve a homeland when it pushes the left wing agenda

Campaign Against Antisemitism on X - "“It’s legally a terrorist organisation.”
“Your opinion is your opinion.”
 If you have wondered why @MetPoliceUK ’s policing of antisemitism and support for terror has been so poor, here is why.  As we have seen at recent protests, anti-Israel demonstrators are now freely showing their support for Hizballah, an antisemitic Iranian proxy that is proscribed as a terrorist organisation under British law.  With the head of MI5 warning about the significant risk posed to the UK by Iranian-backed groups, it has never been more urgent that police understand the very real threat that support for Hizballah and other Islamist terror groups poses to us all.  Here is newly-emerged jaw-dropping footage from London’s Trafalgar Square on 28th September, where a vigil for Hizballah’s leader was taking place in broad daylight.  The video shows what happened when someone tried to inform the police that Hizballah is a terrorist organisation.  How is the Metropolitan Police supposed to protect us when they don’t actually educate their officers on the law?  While these police officers did not conduct themselves satisfactorily, we are posting this video principally because of what it says about the training and priorities of the Metropolitan Police as an institution, and we have therefore chosen to blur their faces."

NizNellie3 on X - "🚨 UPDATE 🚨 Guangtian Ha, the Haverford College professor who was just arrested by the FBI for online harassment is a Muslim from China. He was hiding behind 4 anonymous “MAGA” accounts, repeatedly threatening and harassing Jewish citizens. Professor Ha was  once described by his colleagues as, “one of the most innovative, interesting, and engaged scholars of Islam in China.”
- “Jew get the f*ck out of my country.”
- “If Jews are so special, they should be placed in special camps and receive special treatment.”
In an online interview, he said that it’s important to introduce Islam in China by showing its beauty and charm first, then discuss its politics and tenets. 😬
This lunatic arrived in our nation from Beijing for graduate studies at Columbia University. He has a lengthy history of public antisemitism, but Haverford College refused to fire him. We currently have 40,000 foreign professors on visas in America. Not 400. Not 4,000. 40,000."
Clearly, this is more suppression of "pro-Palestinian" speech, and there's no link between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism