Arthur MacWaters on X - "This is banana republic-level insanity:
> in 41 states, you literally only have to "promise on penalty of perjury" that you're a citizen to register to vote
> in 14, you don't even have to show any ID at the polling place
> this is completely insane for the most powerful country on the planet
If the Senate can't figure out how to nuke the zombie filibuster and pass the SAVE act, I'm not sure we can fix this in a few years Not a partisan issue, literally just a civilizational IQ test Electoral security has broad support and every ethical person wants our elections to be sacred and effective, with only citizens voting."
Arthur MacWaters on X - "Let me get this straight:
> 27 million people registered to vote without any proof of citizenship, right before 2020 election
> the victory margin of every presidential race in the past 30 yrs has been <10m
> the vast majority of Americans want required proof of citizenship in order to vote
> the SAVE act would require in-person registration with documentary proof of citizenship, yet is *still* stuck in the senate
If we don't get this done, it's crystal clear that our elections are not, in fact, secure."
Cernovich on X - "Republicans in Indiana made a deal with Maryland. You don't redraw congressional districts, and we won't. Maryland agreed and then said, "Sike!" This is why all talks of "immigration reform in exchange for border security" are a no-go. Democrats will always betray the deal."
Theo Wold on X - "One of Aesop's most famous fables is the story of the Farmer and the Viper. A farmer finds a frozen viper and brings it back to life-- only for the snake to bite and kill him. Why? Because it's still a snake. Attempting to make a deal with Democrats is the real life equivalent."
Eric Daugherty on X - "๐จ HOLY CRAP! CNN was just forced to report 83% PERCENT of Americans are with Nicki Minaj and want nationwide voter ID This *includes* 71% of Democrats. ๐ฅ In fact — support for voter ID is at its highest level in YEARS! THERE IS NO EXCUSE. Pass the SAVE Act.
"Photo ID to vote, and the American people are with @NickiMinaj!"
"Look, I got all this polling on the screen going back since 2018. You'll notice on all of it, it's all north of 75%, 76%, 76%, 76%, 81%, and then 83% in the last year of Americans agree with Nicki Minaj they favor photo ID to be able to vote."
"You got 95% of Republicans, pretty much all of them, but even 71% of Democrats favor photo ID to vote."
"So again, Nicki Minaj posting that on X. And what you see is that the American people, actually, it's not really all that controversial!"
"The American people are with Nicki Minaj, whether they are Republican or even if they are Democrats. We're talking about 7 in 10 Democrats agreeing with Nicki Minaj that you, in fact, should show a voter photo ID to vote.""
Eric Daugherty on X - "๐จ BREAKING: In a stunning blow to Democrats, 76% PERCENT of BLACK Americans want nationwide voter ID — in other words, the SAVE America Act
White voters: 85% want it
Latino voters: 82% want it
Another leftist narrative just got decimated. Pass voter ID. GET THIS PASSED. ๐บ๐ธ"
Michael Smith | Facebook - "Democrats love and depend on identity politics. It’s class warfare waged through mostly immutable characteristics—race, ethnicity, gender identification. They create political separation between groups and pit them against one another for gain. But there is one class that unifies all Americans, and it’s the one identity Democrats will fight to the death to ignore: The legal American citizen. Why? Because only legal American citizens have the right to determine who wins elections. That’s why election integrity is the reason for the SAVE Act. The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship—such as passports, birth certificates, or naturalization papers—when registering to vote in federal elections. Critics argue that more than 21 million Americans lack easy access to these documents and that non-citizen voting is extremely rare. But the critics are losing. Given that we already need ID to do just about everything, nobody seriously believes that 21 million people can’t obtain one—especially when states offer them for free. That last point matters, because it ties directly into the protests against ICE. One of the most common narratives coming out of Democrat attacks on immigration enforcement is the paired claim that legal immigrants now fear detention and deportation (because, according to Grammy nominees and unhinged Democrats, even citizens are being deported), and that ICE showing up anywhere near polling places is some Trump plot to intimidate POC out of voting. So here’s where intersectionality—another favorite word of the left—pulls it all together. Progressivism isn’t popular, mostly because it fails. Yet progressive politics remain overrepresented in government because Democrats are overrepresented. The hard truth is that Democrats can’t win national elections without corruption or manipulation, and they know the SAVE Act closes their biggest opportunity to cheat. Schumer gave the game away when he said the bill would pass the Senate over their dead bodies—despite 71% support from the very group Democrats claim it will harm the most. They know it will pass because it’s supported by a vast majority of Americans. Harry Enten reported this week that a Pew poll showed 83% overall support for requiring ID to register to vote—95% of Republicans, 71% of Democrats, and across racial lines: 85% of whites, 82% of Latinos, and 76% of blacks. They have no legitimate argument against it. The SAVE Act has already passed the House, will pass the Senate, and Trump will sign it into law. There’s also a strong case it will survive constitutional review if it reaches SCOTUS. This Act is such an existential threat to Democrat political futures that they can’t allow it to stand. So how do they try to kill it? They’ll go to court to tie it up for the rest of Trump’s term. You can bet your sweet arse that if they don’t already have one lined up, they’re recruiting a group—or an individual—of brown-skinned legal citizens from an inner-city apartment complex willing to claim they were too afraid to get an ID for fear of deportation. A lawsuit will be filed by Mark Elias and funded by some Soros- or Reid Hoffman–adjacent “community activist” organization. The gambit is simple: stall SAVE until 2028, retake Congress, install a Democrat in the White House, repeal the law, and return to business as usual. That’s the real way intersectionality works."
Rider on X - "Democrats can finally define a Woman: Those who are too stupid to obtain an ID"
Thread by @fleshsimulator on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "There’s literally no voter fraud ever BUT absolutely under no circumstances can we require people to show a passport or birth certificate to register to vote, because it might disenfranchise irresponsible retards who not only lost their birth certificate but also do not have $25
I am so unbelievably unsympathetic towards anyone disenfranchised by this. You are NOT SUPPOSED TO LOSE your birth certificate. You are SUPPOSED TO HAVE ONE. If you some how do not have one and are for whatever reason unable to come up with $25 to replace a critical government document, not only should you not be allowed to vote, we ought to burn you as fuel"
Clearly, requiring criminals to pay outstanding fees and fines before they can vote again is a poll tax and is unconstitutional
Janet Elaine Parks | Facebook - "Let’s Explain the “Poll Tax” Claim Like You’re 10 ..Part 2.
In Part 1, we walked through the whole “married women won’t be able to vote” panic… Spoiler alert: Marriage certificates exist. Documentation works. Women are not helpless. But somehow the media and certain lawmakers have succeeded in fear-mongering women into believing they’re about to lose their right to vote. My first post broke down just how inaccurate and frankly how ridiculous ..that claim is. If you need that breakdown, the link is in the comments…
Now let’s move on to the next scare tactic: “They’re bringing back a POLL TAX!” Deep breath. Let’s explain what a poll tax actually was. A poll tax was when the government literally charged you money to cast a ballot. As in: You show up to vote. They say, “Pay up or go home.” It was used historically to block poor Americans ..especially Black Americans …from voting. It was discriminatory by design. And it is illegal. The 24th Amendment banned poll taxes in federal elections. The Supreme Court extended that ban to state elections. So no …Congress cannot just “bring back a poll tax.” Now here’s the argument being pushed: “If someone has to pay for a copy of their birth certificate to prove citizenship, that’s basically a poll tax.” Let’s slow this down. If that were true, then:
• Paying for a driver’s license would be a poll tax.
• Paying for a passport would be a poll tax.
• Paying for a marriage license would be a poll tax.
• Paying for a Social Security card replacement would be a poll tax.
Because all of those cost money. And we require those documents for normal adult life. Here’s the difference: A poll tax = paying to cast a ballot. Documentation fees = standard administrative costs that apply to navigating adulthood in America. You are not paying to vote. You are proving who you are. And let’s be honest. If someone is a U.S. citizen living in modern America, they already have one of the following:
• A birth certificate
• A passport
• A REAL ID
• Naturalization papers
This isn’t some brand-new “voting permit.” It’s basic documentation. We require ID for:
• Boarding a plane
• Opening a bank account
• Buying a house
• Getting a job
• Driving a car
• Buying alcohol
Are those discriminatory? Or are they standard safeguards? You can believe in voter access AND believe in voter verification.. Those two ideas are not enemies. The real question is: Is verifying citizenship before registering to vote the same thing as charging someone money to cast a ballot? No. One is identity verification. The other was intentional discrimination. Calling them the same thing is either misunderstanding the law… or intentionally trying to scare people.
Part 1 addressed the name-change narrative. Part 2 addresses the “poll tax” narrative. Both fall apart when you apply basic logic. To the lawmakers pushing this narrative: you don’t need fear to win people over. If that’s your strategy, it’s no surprise voters are walking away… Paperwork is not oppression. Verification is not discrimination. And fear-based messaging doesn’t make something true. That’s Part 2… Faith. Family. Freedom. ๐บ๐ธ"
Left wingers assume it's unreasonable to think that people keep their marriage certificates
Meme - "In May 2025 a REAL-ID started being required for flying. Did women and minorities stop flying?"
Meme - Skeptic Research Center Team @SkepResCenter: "Only one political group in American society believes, in the majority, that voter ID laws are racist: those identifying as “Very Liberal.” Check out our graphs below. Data comes from this study:"
"Requiring an ID card to vote is a racist practice. Agreement by Political Orientation
Very Liberal 53.0%
Liberal 37.3%
Moderate 20.8%
Conservative 12.9%
Total Agreed 20.5%"
Chuck Schumer @SenSchumer: "The SAVE Act is Jim Crow 2.0. It would disenfranchise tens of millions of people. If Trump is saying he won’t sign any bills until the SAVE Act is passed, then so be it: there will be total gridlock in the Senate. ..."
Zeek Arkham ๐บ๐ธ on X - "Dear Chuck Schumer,
Hi. Black dude here. I can trace my family ancestry to slavery. I even know where they were slaves. My mom experienced Jim Crow. I think I’ve watched every episode of “Eyes On the Prize” when I was younger. With that said… Can you directly explain to me how the SAVE Act is “Jim Crow 2.0?” Literally every black person I know has ID. Literally every black person I know has a car or at least a ride. Literally every black person I know knows how to vote (well… except the ones with felonies… but they don’t count). With your advanced white liberal thinking, you must know more than me. Apparently, as I experience daily on this app, white liberals are experts on being black; even more so than actual black folks. Perhaps you could explain it like I’m five. I’d look it up on the internet, but Kathy Hochul has already told me I don’t know what a computer is and Joe Biden said I can’t navigate it, anyway. Looking forward to your answer.
No hugs. Zeek"
Illegal immigrants from Africa, India and China are voting in US elections — here's how they're doing it - "A Mauritanian illegal immigrant marked for deportation since 2002 has continued to live in the US and is a registered Democrat who has voted in every election since 2008, authorities claim. Mahady Sacko, 50, who goes by the nickname “Sacko Scorpion,” was busted last week in Philadelphia for allegedly falsely claiming citizenship to cast a 2024 ballot. He was picked up in a joint operation between Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the FBI, which charge he “falsely represented that he was a US citizen in order to vote and register to vote” in the last presidential election, according to a press release... Sacko’s arrest was one of nearly a dozen uncovered by The Post of non-citizens allegedly voting in US elections, sometimes for decades, with many remaining listed as active voters on state rolls, even after their convictions. “The reality is aliens are voting in American elections,” J. Christian Adams, president of Public Interest Legal Foundation, who has spent decades working on election integrity, told The Post, noting no one is quite sure how widespread the problem is. There were about 14 million people who are in the country legally but who are not citizens in 2023, according to the Pew Research center. While they may have work permits and visas, they can’t vote. “It’s way worse than the left says, but it’s way better than some others say,” he added. Pennsylvania, a crucial swing state, stands out for disastrous alien voter registration, said Adams. The Keystone State has admitted a glitch in its “motor voter” program, which registers voters at the DMV, inadvertently has allowed approximately 100,000 non-citizens to register to vote, though some state officials dispute this number. Another Pennsylvania voter, Indian citizen Kaushalkumar Patel, 47, of Allentown, will stand trial this month for allegedly voting illegally in the 2020 election... Canadian Denis Bouchard, 70, pleaded guilty to two counts of making false claims he was a US citizen to vote in 2022 and 2024 elections in North Carolina and faces 10 years in prison. An investigation by The Post revealed a man of the same name and age had voted in every election since 2004 and was not registered with a political party. That man was removed from voter rolls in that state after Bouchard’s conviction. In one shocking case, Chinese national Haoxiang Gao, 19, who was a student at the University of Michigan, was charged on June 3 last year with illegally voting in the 2024 election, but fled to China before he could face justice. At arraignment, Gao surrendered his Chinese passport to the judge but then boarded a flight from Detroit to Shanghai using another passport with a different serial number, according to the FBI. Gao remains wanted in the US, which does not have an extradition treaty with China. The Post found Gao is still registered as an active voter in Michigan. An October 2025 sweep in Arkansas picked up Cecilia Casellanos, 59, a Cuban national and registered Democrat who had a pending order of removal by immigration enforcement dating back to 1999. Casellanos also had three prior felony convictions in New York for grand larceny and attempted forgery, according to the Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette... Arkansas also nabbed Zlata Risley, 50, of Kazakhstan, who had registered as a Republican, and Nigerian citizen Chi Baum, 59, of no party affiliation. Both were lawful US residents, but not citizens, who illegally voted in the 2024 election, officials said. Risley pleaded guilty and received probation. Details of Baum’s case were not immediately available. In Florida, two Ukrainian women — mom Svitlana Demydenko, 53, and daughter Yelyzaveta Demydenko, 22, both registered Democrats — cast ballots in the 2024 general election after coming to the US in 2021 on nonimmigrant visas, according to the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida... Adams said the main problem is aliens being invited to register to vote, usually through the mail, at the DMV or via third-party groups. “At times, it’s an organic process of aliens getting sucked in unwittingly. Maybe they’d been whipping down Modelos [beers] at a festival and they’re doing some guy a favor who is in their face with a clipboard. Or they’re at the DMV and get these pop-up windows asking them to register. They think, ‘I must be allowed.’ ” He added: “I wish it were a conspiracy plot because it would be easier to bust. This is systemic failure.” The Post found illegal voters span the political spectrum... Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who co-sponsored the SAVE Act in the upper chamber, told The Post he wants voters to keep the pressure up to get the bill passed. “Every few weeks, we learn that ‘the thing that never happens’ has happened again,” he said, referring to illegal voting. “In tight down-ballot races, even hundreds of illegal votes can swing an election, and every illegal vote cast is an attack on a legitimate vote cast by a real citizen.” Ilustrating that point, on Friday, after a recount, Boca Raton, Florida’s new mayor won by just five votes, flipping the mayorship to a Democrat in the Republican stronghold. “It may surprise many Americans to learn that the Supreme Court — wrongly, in my view — has interpreted the law to forbid states from checking citizenship for voter registration. The SAVE America Act would reverse this situation,” Lee added, speaking about a 2013 decision that required only a sworn affirmation of citizenship for voter registration... Polling shows the SAVE Act is extremely popular with voters, getting over 70% support, with even half of Democrats in favor."
Weird. We keep being told this never happens
Senate, FBI probe alleged Chinese plot to influence Biden's election with fake IDs - "Allegations that the Chinese Communist Party manufactured fake driver's licenses and shipped them to the U.S. in a scheme to influence the 2020 presidential election in favor of Joe Biden are being investigated by the Senate Judiciary Committee after the FBI revealed its own probe into the potential bombshell Monday night. FBI Director Kash Patel located and declassified the document at the request of Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley in late May and transmitted it to the committee Monday evening. Grassley, R-Iowa, is demanding further information about the document, which alleges the plot sought to deliver fake driver's licenses to Chinese sympathizers in the U.S. who would cast a vote for candidate Biden. The document does not say whether any ballots were cast as part of the scheme... "explain why the FBI under your predecessor required the original IIR to be destroyed, whether this practice is consistent with the FBI’s past and current practice, and how it comports with federal record preservation requirements." The FBI reporting document came just a month after U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers at the International Mail Facility at Chicago O'Hare International Airport seized nearly 20,000 fraudulent driver's licenses. From January 2020 through June 30, 2020, CBP officers at that location reported seizing 1,513 shipments of fraudulent documents that included a total of 19,888 counterfeit US driver's licenses. "The majority of these shipments were arriving from China and Hong Kong," CBP posted in a July press release."
Wilfred Reilly on X - "Got to clarify here: PROVEN voter fraud is "vanishingly rare," because there is almost no way to prove fraud if ballots can be sent in by mail from the projects or trailer court, and no ID is required to vote in person. Fairly large-scale voter fraud, like (thinking back to my mom and Chicago) unions sending in proxies to vote for absent members, or mass "mistaken" registration of aliens via MotorVoter, is almost certainly very common."
Iraqveteran8888 on X - "If showing an ID to vote is voter suppression, then requiring a 4473 to buy a gun is infringement on the 2nd Amendment. ๐๐ป♂️"
Rafael A. Mangual on X - "I’ve always been annoyed by the inconsistency on the left illustrated by their complaints about “burdens” (having to get an ID or prove your citizenship) on the right to vote. Why don’t those arguments apply to the Second Amendment, in their view? What principle precludes the imposition of any cost on one’s exercise of the right to vote, but has nothing to say about ammunition taxes, or the fact that it costs hundreds of dollars just to acquire a license to carry a firearm in states like New York?"
Meme - "Democrats constantly claim that their voters are more educated than Republican voters. Democrats also claim their voters are too stupid to obtain a voter ID. So which is it? Are they scholarly or stone cold stupid?"
Shiloh Marx on X - "Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) won in Massachusetts by 676,248 votes. Massachusetts had 744,880 duplicate registrations."
Pakistanis Who Have Never Been to US Are Voting in California Elections from Inside Pakistan - "San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Captain says voting records show people outside of the country, in Pakistan, are allowed to vote in the California elections."
Liz Harrington on X - "“Fulton County records show 22,534 more Absentee ballots cast than voters credited with casting a ballot.” That’s almost twice the 2020 margin alone."
Patrick Colbeck✝️ on X - "MI SoS official voter history records in Michigan indicate that there were over 353,000 more ballots cast in #2020election than voters...in a Presidential race reportedly decided by 154,188 votes."
Patrick Colbeck✝️ on X - "BTW...The number of missing voters changes every month despite a statutory requirement to preserve this data for 5 years (MCL 168.509q). The LATEST figure is 499,850 more votes than voters during the #2020Election in Michigan. For those keeping score at home, that is over 3.2X greater than the reported margin of victory for Biden (i.e. "significant"). H/T to data whiz Tim Vetter for his continued database prowess ;) @realLizUSA @RealLindellTV @timlovesann @DeluxePsypher @mifairelections @AGPamBondi @HarmeetKDhillon @EdMartinDOJ @PatrickByrne @GenFlynn @realMikeLindell"
Joey Mannarino ๐บ๐ธ on X - "Japan has 123.8 million people living there and they were able to count their votes in about 8 hours. They voted and the results were out that very same day. Why does it take blue states in America weeks to count votes?"
Lauren Chen on X - "If requiring ID to vote infringes on people's Constitutional rights, you shouldn't need to present ID when buying a firearm. Am I doing it right?...
The difference between voting and buying a gun is that the Founding Fathers didn't think everyone should be able to vote but they did think everyone should be able to buy a gun"
Left wingers' response is just to tell people they're stupid, because they're unable to come up with an argument when their NPC programming is challenged
๐ช️ TAZ ๐ช️ on X - "Liberals: “You shouldn’t need an ID to vote! It’s in the constitution”
Also, liberals: “An ID, background check, and waiting period isn’t enough! We need stricter gun laws”"
Terrell The Leftist๐น✊๐พ on X - "The Electoral College was a Moderate Compromise that gave states that never wanted to abolish slavery a leg up in Federal elections instead of relying on the popular vote. The Electoral College was created to appease racists. We can't continue to keep making these type of compromises."
Wait till left wingers find out why non-citizens count for apportioning House seats
