Meme - "Liberals: *Ashli Babbitt* FAFO'd
Also liberals: *Renee Nicole Good* Innocent victim"
"but at the end of the day. these people are fascists. they want to see state violence against people they don’t like personally. it’s simple as". Ironic, given that they cheered Babbitt's death. And she wasn't even endangering anyone's life so it wasn't self-defence
Meme - Upset stomping crying pink haired soyjak with glasses, breasts and dick, in mismatched coloured clothes: "YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO LET US RUN YOU OVER!"
ICE agent: "LOL, no."
Matt Van Swol on X - "Five Left-wing narratives instantly crumble with the body cam footage:
1) Renee was terrified for her life. She absolutely was NOT. She was smiling and taunting officers. Literally zero fear.
2) The officer was not hit. Clearly, he was hit HARD.
3) Renee didn't know who the officers were. Clearly false from the new footage, they knew EXACTLY who they were.
4) Renee was peacefully trying to leave the scene. Clearly not, she slammed on the accelerator directly into the officer, even when she had nearly a full minute to leave the scene prior to him being in front of the car.
5) Renee wasn't involved in any ICE-related activities. Instantly proven false. The wife/partner in the video clearly states they are going to harass ICE "later".
What is beyond insane to me is that the Renee's partner screams for her "Drive! Drive!" when law enforcement commands her to exit the car. Absolutely horrifying to watch."
Luckily the officer was recording, because even with clear footage left wingers keep on lying. Imagine what it would be like if there wasn't the clear footage?
๐๐ข๐๐ก๐๐๐ฅ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฑ๐๐ง on X - "This is the face of Renee Good, a second before she rammed the ICE agent with her two-ton SUV, plus the video itself. Renee Good and her girlfriend sure talked big. Democrats who incite violence have her death on their hands. It’s time to arrest Tim Walz and Jacob Frey."
๐๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ (Golden Age Arc) on X - "In the moments before the ICE shooting, Renee Good tracks the officer with her head. Rather than seeming afraid or panicked, she wears a taunting smile. In the last frame before she steps on the gas she locks eyes with the camera. She knew exactly what she was doing."
Real Defender on X - "This is Renee Good smiling moments before she attempted to kill an ICE officer. You can hear her wife yelling “drive baby drive” in the background. The left says she was scared and feared for her life. Does she look scared to you?"
Many left wingers claimed they were scared, didn't know what was happening and were just trying to flee, but the video shows they were actively provoking ICE
Paul on X - "It was probably smart to let democrats and libertarians lie for 2 days about this and then release the bodycam footage because they're all caught in a nightmarish news cycle now they can't make go away."
Anna Khachiyan on X - "I’m thinking it won’t matter at all or change anyone’s mind because it doesn’t make any difference to anyone on the left whether someone intended to cause bodily harm to an ICE agent or not since they view ICE as unlawful and illegitimate — not only to the extent that their job is to enforce immigration policy, which they’re against, but also because they view any and all law enforcement as unlawful and illegitimate as long as it suits them."
Breaking911 on X - "Leftist woman says she “feels wrong” for paying her respects to Renee Good because she’s a “white woman who’s privileged.” “White tears are not helpful.”"
Christian Heiens ๐ on X - "You can literally die in service to the Eternal Progressive Omnicause and Leftists will still repudiate you because you’re White. It’s just like that soldier who set himself on fire for Gaza and then Leftists began tweeting about how their own followers “better not celebrate a white man who wore a uniform”. Never before has an ideology demanded total obedience and sacrifice to the point of offering up your own life while simultaneously treating its own adherents as subhuman. We are dealing with a level of psychological derangement that will bewilder future generations for as long as records of this era exist."
An "ally" is a useful idiot who is still ultimately despised for existing
retard mode ✞ on X - "renee good is the epitome of the modern-day liberal white woman
>37 years old
>lost custody of her two older children
>fled to canada after trump won in ‘24
>career as a “poet”
>moved to minneapolis from canada to fight for the “rights” of illegal aliens
>enrolled the only child she has custody of in Southside Family Charter School, who’s mission is to “put social justice first, and prioritize involving kids in political and social action”
>through her involvement with the school, joined “ICE Watch”, a national coalition of “activists” dedicated to disrupting ICE raids
>lost her life while obstructing ICE, as a result of assaulting federal law enforcement with a deadly weapon (her car)
if we want to be a serious country with law & order, anything short of outright abolishment of the 19th amendment would be a grave half-measure. this is the face of chaos, instability, dangerous empathy for criminals, and reckless disregard for the law"
CJ Pearson on X - "An innocent girl being brutally murdered by an illegal alien while out for a jog received less outrage from Democrats than somebody who got herself killed while trying to obstruct ICE from deporting illegal aliens. Tells you everything you need to know about the left. *Laken Hope Riley*"
Thread by @memeticsisyphus on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "I think a lot of radicalization happens in spaces where it’s all talk. Everything is hypothetical. It’s easy to larp as a revolutionary, as someone who stands against oppression. There’s a lack of seriousness about it all. You start to believe the memes. You start to believe you’re a hero, you’re the main character. Then you convince yourself to do something really dumb, like pull your car in front of police officers. They draw their guns and the larp crumbles, you’re not that person, this is real life and those are real guns. Nothing but get the hell out of here screams in her brain. She probably didn’t see the officer standing in front of her car as she smashes the gas. The officers can’t know this of course. They don’t know what she’s thinking they just know when guns were drawn asking her to step out of her vehicle she slammed in the gas on the direction of an officer. They’re not in a Larp. Their job is real and they encounter people who want to kill them. So they fire. No one in this woman’s life told her she’s on a retarded destructive larp. She was encouraged by her peer group. Viral videos of similarly lost radical larpers getting nothing but praise online. Politicians calling the enforcement of our laws akin to Nazis, calling them illegitimate, calling them evil. Telling their citizens to make their voices heard. Everyone in her life failed her. She needed someone to tell her to grow up. Instead she had no one and now she’s dead. A horrible case of internet radicalization.
There won’t be any long NYT articles about the dangers of online radicalization of women. Even though they consume endless far left propaganda and start parroting genuinely insane racial bigotry, and start attacking LEOs. Even though we have the studies showing the massive swing in left wing politics women have. Even though they were the only group to reliably vote left in the last few elections. There will be no discussion about their endless TikTok political slop."
Time to regulate YouTube to stop boys watching any content challenging misandry
Kurt Schlichter on X - "A DEEP DIVE -- Thoughts From a Competent Lawyer on the Minneapolis ICE Shooting:
1. The left is positively turgid about this INCIDENT. They wanted a shooting and did everything they could to set the conditions that made it inevitable, from the rhetoric of the Democrat politicians to the provocations on the street. One leftist white lady dead is a small price to pay for the martyr they wanted.
2. Note that yesterday (1/6/26), the Democrats changed from “The feds are the Gestapo” to “A zillion federal officers died defending Our Democracy, and we support these heroes- here’s a plaque!” back to “The feds are the Gestapo” the very next day.
3. The law is clear – you can use deadly force against someone threatening you with deadly force. The ICE agent had no duty to retreat. This does not matter to the left and its narrative. You will see many experts with zero actual knowledge of the law opining – including the typically terrible cadre of leftist lawyers.
4. The video is clear that the driver was heading at and came in contact with the ICE agent. He had a right to use deadly force to defend himself. This does not matter to the left and its narrative. The left will do everything it can to keep people from looking at the actual video that shows the incident. It will push video that does not show the incident clearly, as well a perjured or irrelevant witness statements.
5. The leftist narrative will be “Trump’s ICE nazis are literally murdering innocent people.” This will work on Democrats and Republican sissies. Normal people will ask why she did not comply with the officers’ orders and why she drove at a cop. Properly addressed, we can leverage the gross irresponsibility of the Dem pols and communist foot soldiers to defeat their bogus narrative.
6. The corrupt state of Minnesota will “investigate” even though its senior officials have already announced that this was murder, and the ICE agent will be indicted in state court. The feds will remove it to federal court, where the case will fail.
7. There will be a civil suit against the US government and the shooter. It will be heard in federal court. Qualified immunity will apply.
8. The shooter will be doxed and his family threatened by leftists, who will cheer this on.
9. There will be rioting in Minneapolis, probably low-grade, since too much will make the left lose sympathy. If it gets serious, look to Trump to send in the armed forces, perhaps under the Insurrection Act.
10. The anti-ICE direct actions will accelerate. Trump will not back down. There will be a decision point facing to the left: Continue the current level of actions, which will have zero effect, or escalate into (further) attempts to murder ICE agents. Some leftists will embrace escalated violence.
The Administration should focus rigorously on the following key points:
1. ICE was present in Minneapolis doing its job removing dangerous criminals.
2. Democrat politicians are creating a dangerous situation with their rhetoric and caused this incident.
3. Democrat activists have been putting people at risk with their dangerous action and it must stop.
4. The communist woman was ordered to stop but attempted to kill a federal agent, who lawfully defended himself with deadly force. WATCH THE VIDEO.
5. WE WILL NTO BACK DOWN FROM MAKING AMERICA SAFE FORM ILLEGAL ALIEN CRIMINALS, INCLUDING FRAUDSTERS."
Kurt Schlichter on X - "MORE DEEP DIVING — Competent Lawyer Thoughts on the Minneapolis Shooting Pt. 2: Another big danger of this kind of incident is the left’s refusal to apply the law as it is to the facts as they are documented on video. As was pointed out to me, this is very similar to the Kyle Rittenhouse situation. The law of self-defense is clear. It’s ancient. The rules are set down, and there is ample precedent to rely on. The fact pattern here similar to the Rittenhouse incident. The law is also similar. Yet the left misconstrued both situations. The facts about today’s shooting are there on video. They are not subject to good-faith dispute as to the events relevant to a claim of self-defense. Rittenhouse was attacked by a guy with a Glock, as well as others with weapons. Here, everyone agrees this woman accelerated her car in the direction of the police officer and struck him. Applying the law of self-defense should be simple; it only gets complicated if you are trying to avoid a result you don’t want it. So, we get two lines of argument from the left. The first is to misstate the law of self-defense. They accept the facts but falsely claim that the facts do not justify invoking self-defense. For example, here, we get arguments that the woman was trying to drive away, though under the law of self-defense, her intent is irrelevant. The analysis is what a reasonable cop would have thought in his position. What she thought doesn’t matter. The second line of argument is to deny the facts, including facts clearly shown on the videotape. We saw that here with people insisting, despite pictures of bullet holes in the windshield and the front of the side mirror, that the police officer was firing into the side window in an effort to deny that he was in the path of the vehicle. Or the facts are minimized. The woman struck the police officer; what we hear is that he was only winged, as if he would’ve had to have been killed before the right to self-defense had arisen. All this is in the service of the leftist narrative, which is crafted to create a martyr to advance the leftist agenda. But what this does is eliminate the ability to resolve disputes and determine the truth through the legal process. How can you guide yourself to conform with a law that is a kind of Calvinball – it is what it needs to be to support a leftist narrative. And how can you not break the law if facts showing you did not break the law are ignored, especially facts that are right there on video? This is a serious problem. You can’t have a society with civil rights when you can’t rely on due process grounded in fixed laws and the determination of objective facts. When one side dispenses with a justice system and replaces it with a social justice system that determines guilt by narrative necessity, the other side will dispense with a justice system, too. Then you have a system based on power. And as we saw today, it’s the guys with the guns that have the power. The left ought to think very long and hard about this."
Left wingers are raging at the ICE agent for standing in front of the car, but when their rioters were standing in front and mobbing cars, they were also raging at the drivers trying to get to safety
Councilwoman Vickie Paladino on X - "A year of referring to federal law enforcement as 'gestapo' and 'nazis' and 'fascists' and 'kidnappers' did this. Repeatedly telling unhinged leftists who have a tenuous grip on reality to begin with that 'the gestapo is coming to kidnap their neighbors' has turned routine federal immigration enforcement into a chaotic and violent spectacle across the country. Yet this is what Democratic leadership CONTINUES to do. These people are told to go out and 'resist' ICE agents, to obstruct and to refuse compliance. They are trained by heavily funded activist nonprofits with ties to the DSA and WFP to organize these mobs and show up wherever immigration enforcement is attempted. They are told they are the heroes in a historic struggle, and it's their moral duty to fight this revolution 'by any means necessary.' It is insurrectionist language, by design. Make no mistake, this is the outcome they wanted. They have been actively working every single day to build up 'resistance' to federal law enforcement knowing full well the crazed activists they were stoking would instigate deadly confrontations with armed federal officers who are just trying to do their jobs. We've seen REPEATED attacks on ICE nationwide, including attempted murders. And today, once again, an activist was doing EXACTLY what she was told to do by these leftist groups -- resist by any means necessary. She refused compliance with federal officers, attempted to flee while hitting an officer with her car, and he took decisive action to preserve his own life and the safety of the people around him. It's an ugly and tragic scene, but the responsibility is 100% with the woman who was breaking the law -- and on the activists who organize and train them to do these things, as well as the Democrat politicians who continue to use insurrectionist rhetoric to undermine law enforcement. This has to stop. Compliance with law enforcement is not optional. You do not have the right to obstruct. It is not 'civil disobedience' to flee the police. Speak your mind, protest if you want, sue in court -- those are your rights. But at the end of the day, ICE has every right to remove people from this country who are here illegally. It's not an 'attack' and it's not 'cruelty' -- its reality."
Bad Hombre on X - "You’ve seen a lot of terrible legal advice from Democrats over the last 24 hours. Let’s dispel it before it gets more people killed.
Claim: ICE aren’t the police.
Fact: ICE is a federal law enforcement agency, and its agents can arrest you.
Claim: You can’t be pulled out of your car by an ICE agent.
Fact: ICE agents can order or forcibly remove you from your car. Refusal may lead to force.
Claim: Cars are not considered a deadly weapon.
Fact: Under federal law (18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3)), a vehicle can be a dangerous or deadly weapon if used in a way capable of causing death or serious bodily injury.
Claim: ICE can’t arrest U.S. citizens.
Fact: ICE can arrest a U.S. citizen for obstructing their work if it involves forcibly resisting, impeding, or interfering with federal officers.
Claim: Blocking a road with your vehicle is not a crime.
Fact: Obstructing a highway or public passage is a crime under state law, and a federal crime if the intent is to obstruct federal law enforcement."
The American Tribune on X - "The best lens through which to view this is how the abolitionists praised John Brown He was a murderous terrorist who butchered the Doyle family, which had no connection to slavery, along Pottawatomie creek. That was his claim to fame, and they loved him for it Then he tried to turn Virginia into Haiti by launching a slave rebellion. In addition to trying to capture Harper's Ferry so he could hand out rifles to the freed slaves, he brought along thousands of pikes, on which they could presumably spit the white women and children around them. He was financially supported in doing this by a collection of Boston-based abolitionists, and the Northern press, which cheered him on and framed him as an angelic hero after he was defeated and arrested for a treasonous rebellion in which he did nothing other than kill a few civilians, including a free black man That brought about the Civil War. The South saw, with horror, how the abolitionists were gleefully praising John Brown for trying to start a rebellion in which as many men, women, and children would be butchered by pike-wielding free slaves as possible. Unwilling to let their farms turn into renditions of the Haitian white genocide, the South started mobilizing with a view toward war and secession, if necessary What do we now see? A collection of leftist agitators who are funded by subversive billionaires like George Soros are continually trying to maim and murder anyone to the right, particularly whites. Criminals are let out of jail dozens of times so that they might inflict murder and mayhem, rioters are given a free hand to set what remains of the productive slivers of cities alight, and federal agents aiming to defend us from invasion are faced with murderous attacks and constant, debilitating riots. We are in the midst of a nationwide, slow-moving raid on Harper's Ferry by the sorts who garnered notoriety during the flame-filled Summer of Floyd The John Brown case because a disaster because, though he was hanged, the government didn't ameliorate the concerns of the Southerners by arresting and hanging his financial backers, or by dealing with the subversive abolitionist press. That convinced them it was time to go to war If we are to avoid such chaos again, all the leftist rioters, their financial backers, and the organizations that support them must be broken on the wheel of federal law enforcement"
Cynical Publius on X - "One side note on the below. Watch the video and listen to the woman taking it. LE just shot somebody who was trying to run over a LE officer. In such a situation, normal people try to get the hell away from a dangerous scene, for their own protection. But not Minnesota Karens. Nope, they go running around, shrilly cursing, trying to further interfere without even the slightest common sense of self-preservation. Besides being generally insane, Democrat Karens have not even a scintilla of common sense."
Hans Mahncke on X - "The woman recording the video, the woman driving the car, and the woman featured in Nick Shirley’s documentary all share something in common beyond being from Minnesota. They have been thoroughly conditioned by the media and Democrats into genuinely believing the Trump-as-Hitler narrative. Trump Derangement Syndrome is very real and it has produced an entire ecosystem of volatile and unhinged individuals. Any serious attempt to lower the political temperature would begin with deprogramming those who have been driven into a state of obsession and irrationality over Trump."
Laura Powell on X - "Part of the reason white leftists engage in this kind of dangerous behavior is that they actually believe that law enforcement officers are tools of white supremacy and therefore their whiteness will protect them. Around 2020, there were calls for white people to “put their bodies on the line” at protests to form a human shield protect people of other races. Many complied and were praised for being good allies."
The Facts Dude ๐ค๐ฝ on X - "Please flip your text books to Tousis v. Billiot
The Tousis v. Billiot case solidifies the legal view that a vehicle in motion, even at low speeds or while maneuvering to escape, can be considered a deadly weapon if it is in close proximity to an officer or bystanders. This is justified."
Amy Swearer on X - "I've now watched the Minneapolis ICE shooting from three different angles, and there's no real question -- it was quite obviously a legally justified use of deadly force by a law enforcement officer. That officer faced an unknown subject who, while ignoring lawful commands, pointed a 3000+ lbs. car at him and evidenced an intent to continue driving that car. He shot the driver (1) after the driver made physical contact with his body and (2) through the front windshield. You can slow down the video all you want and spend minutes analyzing micro-seconds to make after-the-fact assessments of the likelihood the driver actually intended to use the car as a lethal weapon. In reality, during those micro-seconds in real time, it's reasonable to presume that a driver ignoring your commands to stop is about to floor the gas peddle, turn the wheel into you, and run you over. It's no different than the reasonable presumption that the suspect who ignores your commands to keep their hands up and reaches for the gun in their waistband intends to use it against you rather than toss it away."
Amy Swearer on X - "Moreover, it's entirely possible for both of the following to be true: (1) the driver did not subjectively intend to run over the ICE agent standing directly in front of her vehicle, and (2) the ICE agent standing directly in front of her accelerating vehicle reasonably feared she was, in fact, about to slam on the gas and run him over. The first point gives the driver a pretty solid defense to charges of attempted murder or aggravated assault on a police officer. The second point is a pretty solid justification for the officer's use of lethal force. It's not one or the other. It's both."
Amy Swearer on X - "And for the "it was an illegal arrest because ICE has no authority to detain American citizens, etc." crowd... Minnesota law explicitly authorizes federal immigration agents to make warrantless arrests when, within the scope of assignment, they come upon reasonable cause to believe "any felony" has occurred. Impeding a federal agent [such as by angling your car across a roadway to block their travel] is, in fact, a felony. You may think it's weak potatoes, but those potatoes still make french fries."
Paul on X - "Pretty crazy. A snowbank saved an officers life after a female driver rams him with her car."
Amy Swearer on X - "This is a remarkably on-point example of how badly things can turn out for officers who try to guess a non-compliant driver's motives, and guess wrongly. Even at close range. All it takes is a half-second for the driver to floor it and swerve at you instead of away."
