Fury in Ireland over hundreds of asylum seeker 'minors' found to be adults - as suspect accused of killing boy at a unit for migrant children 'is found to be a grown man' - "the suspect charged with the murder of the 17-year-old Ukrainian boy at a facility for minors is now believed by authorities to actually be an adult. Almost 200 adults were placed in children's accommodation operated by the Irish Child and Family Agency, Tusla, over the last three years before it was discovered that they were over the age of 18. The number of immigrants who applied for international protection as minors but were subsequently deemed 'ineligible' because of their age has more than doubled since 2023, according to the Irish Independent... The Dublin suburb of Saggart exploded with anti-migrant protests in October after local media alleged a ten-year-old Irish girl had been sexually assaulted in the grounds of a hotel housing asylum seekers... Vadym Davydenko died after being stabbed during an altercation at a Tusla-run emergency accommodation centre in Grattan Wood, Donaghmede on October 15. The 17-year-old had only been in Ireland for four days before the fatal incident. He had been staying at a facility for juvenile international protection applicants separated from their parents. A suspect, understood to be a teenager also residing at the children's facility, was later arrested and charged with Vadym’s murder. While the suspect's age was given at 17 in his first court appearance, inquiries have allegedly led the police to believe that the suspect is in fact an adult male. Investigators examined his background and procured a birth certificate from his relatives, indicating that the suspect was over the age of 18 at the time of the fatal incident."
MichaeloKeeffe on X - ""Let's drop this whole thing of Ireland belonging to the Irish, this is something people need to unlearn now.""
Corey Walker on X - "Why did Ireland import people who hate their nation and want to dispossess the native population? Ireland never had an empire so there's no justification for this, even from the usual woke excuses. No wonder the far right is surging all over Europe. Who wants this?"
Martin Sellner on X - "In human history, huge migration of foreign males to a certain area ofte led to the total extinction of the indigenous male population.
- Iberia (Bronze Age): Steppe groups triggered a near-total male-line replacement in ~200 years. Native male lines went extinct.
- Levant (Bronze Age): Kura-Araxes migration brought Y-haplogroup J, displacing earlier male lines.
- Britain (Anglo-Saxons): Eastern England saw 50–100% replacement of native Y-chromosomes by continental migrants.
Maybe something to take into consideration when you wonder why males are voting for parties who want to reduce mass migration."
Rebecca Mistereggen on X - "Iran has already deported over 1.5 million Afghans in 2025. Pakistan has sent back more than 1 million. While Europe debates “diversity” and let them rape their way through our nations, other countries carry out mass expulsions in the millions. When a nation wants to protect its people and its borders, it does."
Is it racist to condemn Iran and Pakistan for expelling Afghans?
Seth Frantzman on X - "Maybe they aren’t “asylum seekers” The Orwellian term “asylum seeker” was invented so that every person who arrives immediately claims “asylum” and are a “seeker” when in fact data shows most of them are men, and many come from majority groups back home; far from being persecuted, many are actually from the persecuting group; while actual people who need asylum, such as women, minorities and the vulnerable are pushed aside. The goal was to turn a huge majority of men who want to immigrate into “asylum seekers”. We should abolish the use of this term. And we should abolish the concept of asylum being an option for every person. Instead countries should automatically put women, young children and minorities at the front of the line. 19-30 year old men shouldn’t be at the front. Asylum used to be something a small number of people received and requested. It wasn’t something that everyone sought. But an army of NGOs went out and told people they should all apply for asylum; they also encouraged people to meet certain criteria, claiming to be under 18 or “unaccompanied” minors. A huge Orwellian nomenklatura has grown up around this, from “undocumented” migrants to “asylum seekers”. Better to begin the process of removing these terms from our lexicon. When data shows that the vast majority of “asylum seekers” are young men …it’s clear they are not ; when the data shows women actually have a HARDER time getting asylum, including women who are trafficked and exploited by those men"
Fugitive Caesar on X - "pretty wild that in both America and England, the government limits how many citizens are allowed to study in medical schools, then uses that self-imposed restriction in order to complain about a shortage of qualified workers, which can only be solved with cheap foreign labor."
The solution is to subsidize medical school even more so governments will impose even lower quotas to save money
Spencer Hakimian on X - "JD Vance: “It’s totally reasonable to not want neighbors who speak another language.”"
Hunter📈🌈📊 on X - "That’s actually not reasonable at all."
James Stevens 🏴🇬🇧 on X - "funny how the same ppl object to the Brits who go the south of Spain, set up British enclaves (pubs, chips shops etc) & don't learn the language"
Misquote aside, there's a hierarchy of white people to hate
Meme - End Wokeness: "Pictures from a riot today in Mexico City "Pay taxes. Learn Spanish. Respect my culture" "Not your home""
It's only racism and xenophobia in one direction
Reflections on United Arab Emirates
Melissa Chen on X - "We can talk about UAE / Singapore versus Australia and the West more broadly as model states in how they deal with Islamist extremism but let's actually look at an example that demonstrates the point. In 2002, Singaporean Zulfikar Shariff fled to Australia after getting charged for his activities organizing and campaigning against a hijab ban in schools, and defending and promoting Al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. Australia welcomed him with open arms, and provided him with scholarships and a place to further postgraduate study, despite not having an undergraduate degree, even after his work with Al-Qaeda financiers was made public in 2006 by the left leaning ABC. He was granted Australian citizenship in 2011. He continued to receive state grants and unemployment benefits from the Australian government, all the while continuing his activism from there. He made videos posted on various social media sites where he said things like Chinese Singaporeans were colonial settlers, not migrants, and that Singapore's ideology had insulted, degraded and oppressed Muslims. In 2016, he gets arrested when he returned to Singapore and detained under the Internal Security Act. He then renounces his Singaporean citizenship and returned to Australia where he now resides with his family. If this is the kind of immigrant Australia accepts, is the Bondi massacre really such a surprise? Why does Australia grant citizenship to people who are not compatible with the values they claim to embrace? Shariff's case highlights differences in how Singapore and Australia approach these issues. The West embraces high-minded ideals of tolerance and pluralism which is commendable, but has its trade-offs in terms of balancing security and freedom. It's time to have that difficult conversation:
which way, Western man?"
Meme - "I need you all to start asking leftists what is the difference between a colonizer and an immigrant?"
mitra @persianmama111: "What you're referencing is colonization. White people who aggressively try to colonize another country deserve what's coming to them in that regard... and Europe is where white people belong if we're gonna start segregating people. The US has never been a white country. It was built on indigenous peoples blood"
mitra @persianmama111: ""They didn't come here legally" I don't give one single fuck"
"just the reminder... the pilgrims weren't colonizers. they were fleeing the same big-government tyranny the Left romanticizes today"
Basically a colonizer is white and an immigrant is non-white
Restore Britain on X - "Multiculturalism has failed."
Will Tanner on X - "This is very much incorrect, and shows a misunderstanding of what happened The point of mass migration and the "multiculturalism" that resulted from it was not to make life better for Westerners; were the goal better lives, the old empires would still be intact Rather, the goal was total destruction. Destruction not only of public beauty and cohesion, but of our shared sense of religion, culture, history, and outlook. The goal was to create no go zones in Paris, grooming gangs in Britain, firebombs in Sweden, and so on. Such is seen as justified revenge for the supposed ravages of colonialism and, in the process, makes a divided base of subjects easier to rule and exploit So, multiculturalism has succeeded wildly, as it has brought about all that and more"
As they say, the purpose of a system is what it does
Vietnamese community rallies together to fight back against Sudanese gangs terrorising their shops - "Young Vietnamese people are vowing to take action after video of their elders being attacked by thugs went viral. The shocking footage shows people, believed to be shopkeepers, defending themselves with chairs against a group of men of African appearance. Screaming, shouting and smashing can be heard as the group of Vietnamese people try to push back against the group, who allegedly attacked them after asking for a cigarette and being rejected. The clip left many young Vietnamese people in the area furious, and they have vowed to band together and fight back... Another Vietnamese man said it was 'time to prove who we are'. 'This message to all Vietnamese people in west Melbourne! 'You rather just stand there and watch your children or family member been [sic] robbed, bashed, raped then do nothing - or join us to protect our love [sic] one from this.'"
From 2020
Mike Jones on X - "🚨The case for Third World immigration, refugees included, has effectively collapsed. The experience of Somali communities in the United States, and the Mirpuri grooming-gang scandal in Britain, have brought the argument to a close. The debate is over. At this point, anyone still arguing for Third World immigration is doing so on one of two grounds: naked ethnocentrism, or a kind of John Lennon–style utopian fantasy. There is no serious, grown-up case left to make."
Meme - Erik Dale @EuroDale: "Actually, there is a third, much darker, type of pro immigration fanatic."
Torgeir Salih Holgersen @SalihTorgeir: "The West is built solely on racism and genocide, and must be destroyed as a political and identity- based cultural community in order for the world to become peaceful and just. To achieve that, someone must take on the job of working to destroy the West from within. I am on the case."
Tsotha: "This is just a communist, it's always about destroying the system they live in, Migration is just one of their tools to do so"
Torgeir Salih Holgersen on X - "The West has never been about anything else than genocide and exploitation of other peoples. The destruction of the West as an identity project and political block is therefore great news to the vast majority of the world's population."
We're still told that left wingers don't have their countries
Melissa Chen on X - "What we have learnt is that the key to thriving as a criminal syndicate in the West today is PROTECTED status.  Something that the Somali daycare owners in Minnesota and the Pakistani grooming gangs in the UK have in common is immunity because of the magical thing both groups possess - melanin. Notice that no one bats an eyelid when you talk about the Italian mafia, the Irish mob or even Albanian thugs? You can discuss these things so flippantly, and discuss their brazen crimes without being accused of racism or xenophobia, simply because they’re white. The walking on eggshells, not-wanting-to-be-called-racist dynamic shielded Somali and Pakistani immigrants from scrutiny and justice for more than a decade. The latter has been going on for several. The consequences? Billions in tax fraud. Young women being raped. In both cases, there had been a slow drip of journalists and government employees trying to bring attention to these problems. In both cases, DEI sensibilities were too strong to allow the signal out EVEN when the whistleblowers were themselves recognized as friendly to the left (read: minorities). Only after populist anger bubbles up (thanks to X and @elonmusk ) did the authorities try to appear responsive. We are still nowhere close to understanding the depth and scope of these crimes, let alone achieving restitution."
Kambree on X - "It takes a special kind of lunatic to think that importing welfare recipients who want to kill us is a good idea #ThursdayThoughts"
Richard Hanania on X - "The UAE as a capitalist, open borders utopia. Americans could live like gods if not for small minded nationalism."
Thread by @jonst0kes on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "I've worked there, so I know something about this, & I imagine many or most of the MAGA right would actually go UAE-style labor mobility if the whole, entire system were really a possibility -- but you won't understand what I mean from this excerpt. What I mean is this: You can leave your wallet laying out in a cafe, and nobody will steal it. Nobody is ever going to take something from your hotel room. You won't get into a fight there, or really see any of the foreign-born workers breaking the law. Why? Instant deportation for breaking the law. They will absolutely scoop up a foreign-born janitor, waitress, or petroleum engineer and yeet them back across the border if they break a law. In other words, it's not "open borders" in the sense of anyone can come and go as they please. They know who's in the country, and they will remove you from it if you get crossways with the authorities even just a tiny bit. Somehow I don't think this is what the left-libertarian "open borders" crowd is really proposing, though. But I think the right would probably be ok with it.
The other thing that I pretty strongly dislike about this post -- apparently it's by @bryan_caplan so I will tag him here since I follow him -- is the idea that people are coming there because tolerance and diversity and hope and better life etc. You would not learn this in a one-day layover the UAE chatting with some friendly locals, but when you work there enough to get a feel for the regional dynamics & how people who live there talk when they're at dinner, you learn the real reason why people leave behind the ancestral homelands where their families & tribes have dwelt for millennia to go to the UAE and wait tables or scrub floors: The whole region is a hot mess, and is often destabilized, and every time a new country over there gets shaky and violence breaks out (often because the US is mucking about in some way with it), people head for the UAE as the central island of stability where they can hold down a steady job and send money back to their ancestral homeland where they would actually be happy to stay and live if it weren't in some state of collapse or turmoil. Anyway, that whole post is terrible and I would urge Caplan to reconsider this approach of, "I had a one-day layover and chatted with some people and took some pictures, so here is why this place is great and we should be more like it" genre of... well, I don't even know what to call this. When I landed in the UAE, there were armed guards in the airport and as I crossed through this one section after getting my bags from the baggage claim, they approached me and took me aside into a room and were like, "Where is the knife. Get it out of your bag." They screen every single bag that comes into the country down to the smallest detail -- a friend of mine said there was a good documentary about this and how insane the level of scrutiny is at the airport -- and they found my Leatherman and I had to give it up. I also had to show them I was there to work and give them phone numbers and where I was staying etc. "Open borders" lol pleeze. I'm so cheesed at how bad that article was I can't even. The UAE is a monarchy. And if you criticize the monarchy they will send you right back across the "open borders" and you won't be able to get back in. So you do not, under any circumstances, criticize the government while you are there. Even white-collar startup guys & VCs etc do not criticize the UAE government while they are on UAE soil. Everyone knows better than this. If you have some negative thoughts about the monarchy, you keep it to yourself while you're there. But hey, tolerance!
I was about to say that I don't think Caplan has ever lived in a place with a ruthless set of codes around what's off-limits to say, where you get un-personed instantly for a single slip-up, but then I remembered he's an academic so he should be better calibrated than this. This doesn't shock me at all. Again, it's a monarchy, & if you're on their soil & are not a member of their monarchy or possessed of some other form of massive leverage then you are there at their arbitrary pleasure & they will do what they like with you.
Just to be clear: I don't actually dislike the UAE. It's a lovely enough place, & I'd go back to Dubai for vacation or whatever. If one of my kids grew up & went there for work, I'd be like "cool have a good time, just be careful." I also don't dislike Caplan, the post's author. What I dislike is "open borders" in both its libertarian and lefty anarcho-tyranny manifestations, & I especially dislike that extremely creepy and bad substack post."
Basil the Great on X - "🚨 President Trump has just released the data on what percentage of immigrants by country are receiving benefits Keir Starmer still refuses to do this in the UK"
Hans Mahncke on X - "The insanity of this is that a foreign family visiting Disneyland for a week has to prove hotel bookings, return flights, enough money for the entire stay, and a stable job back home. That is for a few days. You would assume that the bar for people who want to stay forever would be far higher. Instead, it effectively does not exist at all. This is a complete inversion of basic logic."
Tyler Oliveira on X - "100 days of your working year gets taxed to fund the importation and enrichment of 3rd world parasites that hate you, hate your culture, hate your religion, hate your language, hate your history, hate your heroes, hate your success, and hate your laws."
Thread by @MattWalshBlog on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "Everything you need to know about the immigration debate can be found in this one fact: immigration enforcement is only ever considered controversial when predominately white countries do it. Non-white, non-western countries frequently have very strict immigration policies, ruthlessly enforced, and nobody objects. Only the United States and Western Europe are expected to have open borders. Every other country on Earth can close their borders and punish intruders and nobody will say a word about it. Go to Japan or India and argue for “open borders” and you’ll be laughed out of the room. They might debate some of the finer details of their immigration policy but the idea that there shouldn’t be borders or enforcement at all isn’t even considered, and it shouldn’t be. We’re the only ones who are expected to take that kind of madness seriously."
Meme - "Who wants obnoxious diaspora nationalism?" *everyone raising their hands*
"Who wants to actually live in the country they are nationalistic about?" *no one raising their hands, looking down dejectedly*
AF Post on X - "Almost 40% of Australian boys aged 13-17 support "right-wing extremism" according to the University of Melbourne. Follow: @AFpost"
Jonatan Pallesen on X - "Is there any bound for the degree to which they will keep calling normal citizens who are skeptical of mass immigration “right-wing extremists”? It does not make any logical sense to call 40% of the population “extremists”, but yet they continue. If eventually most of the population who are not recent immigrants are against continuing the mass immigration, will they keep calling them all extremists?"
Teen-killing refugee to stay after visa ruling - "A Sudanese refugee involved in a vicious bashing that left an 18-year-old dead has been spared deportation after the Administrative Review Tribunal overturned the cancellation of his visa, in a setback for the government’s attempts to toughen visa decisions in the wake of the Direction 99 debacle. The man, who migrated to Australia at the age of four and who can be identified only as BCQR, was himself 18 when he joined three other men in the late-night pursuit of the victim through Melbourne streets in 2021."
The British Patriot on X - "85% of the worlds refugees are Muslim. Not one of the 56 Muslim countries are taking in refugees. 11 of these countries are the richest in the world. If Islam is so great; why are Muslims countries not taking care of their own?"
Matthew Camenzuli on X - "It's funny... the biggest advocates for mass uncontrolled immigration into Australia, also think Australia is unceded Aboriginal Land. How do they sleep at night?"
Wall Street Mav on X - ""Greenland belongs to Greenlanders"
The Left: "I stand with Greenland"
"Ireland belongs to the Irish"
The Left: "That's racist" 😡"
The rise of homonationalism - spiked - "Conservative MP Katie Lam was speaking, and she made a remark that would once have been uncontroversial, but now feels borderline taboo. LGBT rights, including same-sex marriage, she argued, are the product of particular cultures. Britain and the West built the legal and cultural framework that made LGBT equality possible. It did not happen by accident. Around the same time, a video from France went viral. It shows a young, very camp man, wearing make-up and sporting truly impressive eyebrows, being approached by a Muslim influencer who offers him cash to say ‘salam aleykoum’ – or ‘peace be upon you’ – on camera. The young man recoils and snaps back: ‘No. We’re in France here.’ It showed a refusal to play along. An assertion of cultural confidence. No apology offered. His reaction felt like part of a trend that’s been building for some time in France. Last year, Nicolas Scheffer of Têtu – France’s biggest LGBT magazine – reported that of all the parties represented in the National Assembly, it was the hard-right National Rally that sent the largest number of openly gay MPs to parliament in 2022. By cross-referencing public sources, between 20 and 25 of National Rally’s 89 MPs are believed to be gay. Spain offers an even more explicit example. Natalie Donback, a reporter at Coda, describes the rise of Carlitos de España – a gay YouTuber originally from Bolivia and now based in Barcelona’s Eixample district. ‘Islam keeps me up at night’, he says. ‘They want me dead.’ Along with other influencers, Carlitos helped form Las Marifachas, a deliberately provocative group whose name fuses a slur for gay men with a slur for fascists. Alongside InfoVlogger, a YouTuber, and Madame in Spain, a drag queen from Alicante, they have built a bridge between parts of Spain’s LGBT community and the radical-right Vox party. Their content is not polite. It is not sanitised. Yet it expresses real fears. Germany offers perhaps the sharpest data point of all. The leader of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, Alice Weidel, is a lesbian woman in a long-term civil partnership with a Sri Lankan – a fact that causes some progressives to short-circuit. A poll of over 60,000 users of gay-dating app Romeo found the AfD to be the most popular party among respondents, with nearly 28 per cent support. The Greens followed on around 20 per cent. The centre-left SPD trailed on just 12.5 per cent. The gay vote, if there is such a thing, is clearly not wedded to the kinds of left-wing parties that we might once have expected it to be. This trend has acquired a name: homonationalism. Progressive politics has spent years insisting that all cultures are equal, that borders barely matter, and that any concern about immigration is morally suspect. In doing so, it has refused to confront a basic reality. Attitudes to homosexuality vary dramatically across the world, and large numbers of migrants to Europe come from countries that remain deeply hostile to gay people. Britain’s gay community knows this better than most. In 2020, three gay men, James Furlong, David Wails and Joe Ritchie-Bennett, were murdered in Reading, in what prosecutors described as an act of religious jihad by Libyan refugee Khairi Saadallah. The killer was known to have made homophobic comments to friends and had said that gay people were not accepted in Libya... Homonationalism is not about nostalgia, or gratitude for same-sex marriage. It is about the present, and about a growing sense that polite society is unwilling to defend the conditions that made LGBT freedom possible in the first place."
Time to ban the "far right" to protect gay people
