While I mourn the loss of another soul to the forces of darkness, I notice the following:


cheryl be good: Whistle-blower

"I want to bring to attention a character so lame and inane, with so much time on his hands probably because no one wants to go out with him, someone whose life is so devoid of joy, fulfilment, gratification and meaning that he has made it his personal mission to attack and discredit a religion of which he has no interest in.

He professes to be a die-hard and stalwart atheist. What puzzles me are the unbridled passion and impressive drive he possesses and displays in his hate campaign for someone who is religiously neutral.

I reckon if he had channelled to his studies and other areas of his life the same passion and drive he’s committing to his anti-Christ efforts, he would have been the President’s Scholar. (He is not)

Why would anyone have the interest, let alone fervour to launch the hate campaigns he does, write scores of essays and expositions convincing the general public of his view when he has decided that it’s not his cup of tea? He must be very free.

Please don’t defend him by entertaining the laughable possibility that he could be doing all this for intellectual purposes. There is nothing intellectual about any of his views and I think he should focus instead, like everyone else on expounding and defending what he is actually passionate about (like maybe promoting the causes of fat people?), instead of making it his business to denigrate something he is not.

This is his website. www.gssq.blogspot.com

On the left are his juvenile and laughable attempts at discrediting Christianity; one of the essays includes a report of his single experience in a church service. I wonder why someone so averse to Christianity would spend precious time going to church only to come home and write a thousand-word report to ridicule the people in church if he wasn’t mentally/socially challenged with no focus or comfort in life.

It’s not as if he’s being paid to write.

I do not believe a person of his intellectual calibre and moral standing; or lack thereof will ever make it anywhere in life in any capacity."


It's good to see that the classic Singaporean argumentative techniques of the ad hominem attack (aka 'You suck') and the non-sequitur (aka blandly asserting something without making an argument for it) are well and alive.

And I'm sure Alcoholics Anonymous and Operation Clambake (an anti-Scientology website) will be happy to know that they have no raison d'etre and can thus shut down forthwith.

"Finally, be ye all of one mind, having compassion one of another, love as brethren, be pitiful, be courteous: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing. For he that will love life, and see good days, let him refrain his tongue from evil, and his lips that they speak no guile: Let him eschew evil, and do good; let him seek peace, and ensue it."


Addendum: "I have deleted gssq aka Agagooga's comment, because I have deemed it unworthy of my rejoinder."

Very good.