Jonatan Pallesen on X - "This is madness. Look at how much it took for the British authorities to save this girl from the Pakistani rape gangs. She went to the police, gave a six hour report, and provided DNA evidence. Still nothing. Just back to being raped five times a day. Even after the perpetrators were convicted, there has been complete failure. The rapists were out again after less than four years, threatening the victims, who receive no protection.
Having a system that is not able to protect 12-year-old-girls from being raped is very bad. Having mass immigration of child-rape loving Pakistanis is very bad. And having both at the same time is even worse"
Muh Soggy Knees on X - "kind of ironic how all libshits, radfems, any sort of feminists, who like bringing up every so often the Junko Furuto case from nearly 40 years ago, are uniquely silent about it. They like calling japanese the nation of rapists and misogynists and turn a blind eye on it."
The grooming gangs scandal is still going on – the abusers are using any means possible - "A national, institutional failure to act has enabled the idea to develop that the “whole Asian community is branded with the same accusation,” says Moore. “If you speak to the British Pakistani community, a good proportion actually want to have an inquiry…I’ve always said it’s been a minority of predominantly Pakistani British men targeting predominantly white girls. Now you have people entering the debate who are maybe less aware of the complexities.”"
Michael Gove: Whitehall officials tried to suppress grooming gangs scandal details - "Lord Gove has claimed that Whitehall officials tried to suppress details of the grooming gangs scandal. The former Tory Cabinet minister said he overruled government and council officials who were seeking to block the publication of information about a victim in Rotherham. As the then education secretary, he said he had rejected the attempted legal action on the basis that it was better to tell “the truth”. Lord Gove also warned that the proposed structure of a new national inquiry into the scandal might limit its ability to scrutinise the failings of police and government at a national level. His comments, made on GB News, come days after the publication of a report by Baroness Casey, which found that police and councils avoided pursuing child sex grooming gangs for fear of being seen as racist. Even though there was evidence that a disproportionate number of Asian men had been responsible in such cases, their role was covered up by successive governments and authorities over concerns about raising community tensions, the review concluded."
This must end the grooming gangs cover-up for good - "For decades, officials and politicians have systematically turned a blind eye to the horrific grooming gangs operating across Britain. It is therefore welcome that after months of pressure, Sir Keir Starmer has felt forced to announce a national inquiry into the full extent of the scandal. It is also long overdue. A culture of cover-ups and dismissive attitudes have concealed the true scale of offending from the public, extending from local council officials and police officers fearful of accusations of racism to national politicians like Lucy Powell, who in May felt able to call references to the scandal a “dog whistle”. Even in January, when Elon Musk and others brought renewed focus to the issue on social media, Sir Keir Starmer’s first instinct was to kick the issue into the long grass, commissioning a fresh review from Baroness Louise Casey and resisting calls for a full national inquiry. It is hard not to suspect – as Sir Trevor Phillips, former chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, has claimed – that Sir Keir’s reluctance was “political”, motivated by the extreme discomfort that a full inquiry will bring to the Labour party. Some of the highest profile scandals took place under the view of Labour councils, amid Pakistani-heritage communities seen as reliable Labour voters, and it is likely that any full inquiry will bring to light yet more damning evidence of the party’s effective complicity."
Rotherham ‘grooming victim’ was told ‘white girls are for rape’ - "A woman said she was told that being rape “is what white girls were for” when she was attacked as a teenager in Rotherham, a jury has heard. The alleged victim was about 14 years old when she was raped by Sageer Hussain, who was about the same age as her, and two other men, Sheffield Crown Court heard... Mr Ajaib, who was about 18 at the time, allegedly raped her in an alleyway. “She told him she didn’t want to do it,” Mr Bailey said, adding: “He was a lot bigger than her and she felt overpowered. She realised she had no choice.” Mr Bailey said this girl was forced into sexual intercourse on “about five or six occasions”, as she was “in fear of being hurt if she didn’t do it”. The prosecutor said Mr Makhmood, who was 18 or 19 at the time, raped the same girl in an old graveyard in Rotherham as she fought against him. Mr Bailey said that he called her a “slag” and a “dirty b----” before spitting at her and laughing."
It's only a despicable hate crime if "minorities" are targeted
Grooming gangs: Former Rochdale MP says he was 'warned' by party figures not to mention ethnicity - 'They were concerned about votes' - "Former Labour MP Simon Danczuk has told GB News he was "warned off" by party figures from raising the issue of ethnicity in grooming gangs, due to concerns about "votes"... "I was the MP from 2010 to 2017 in Rochdale. The Rochdale grooming scandal broke as a story in 2012, and I quickly came out saying that ethnicity and religion were a key factor in the abuse. "The perpetrators had a very low opinion of the victims because they were Christian, because they were white, because they were working class, and they used that as an opportunity to to groom them and to rape them." Recalling how he was "warned" off by Labour figures, Danczuk explained: "I was warned off by a couple of significant members of the Labour Party. I was told not to mention the ethnicity or the religion of the perpetrators, but I ignored that and continued to do so. "The most senior figure at the time was Tony Lloyd, who was chair of the Parliamentary Labour Party, and I wrote to the National Inquiry in 2017 saying that he'd warned me off it and he was concerned about votes." Noting the "clear" reasoning for their warning to Danczuk, he added: "They thought it would upset the voting of Pakistani communities and they didn't want to lose the vote, it was quite clear about that. "The good news now is because of what's gone on since 2010, 2012, is that everybody is quite clear, abusing children is totally unacceptable." Discussing one of the issues raised in the Baroness Casey report, Jacob Rees-Mogg suggested that any abuse carried out by "illegal asylum seekers and illegal immigrants" have much less sanction against them... "cover-ups" by "people in authority" has "emboldened" abusers to carry out their crimes. Danczuk said: "That's right, and because a number of people in authority, the police and in social services have deliberately ignored or covered up the abuse by these particular perpetrators, I think they feel emboldened. "They feel emboldened and continue to commit these types of crimes, there's no doubt about that.""
We're all 'extremists' now - "The horrific atrocities in Southport and the horrors of the rape gangs are going to be used to justify a sharp clamp down on free speech and free expression. That’s the conclusion you’d draw were you to read a bombshell new document from the Home Office... The report, commissioned by Labour Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, after the unrest last summer, throws full light on how those at the very heart of the state really think. Just like in the aftermath of the immigration protests last summer, when Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper rushed to curb free speech, the shocking document from the Home Office pulls back the curtain to reveal the instinctive impulse of the state bureaucracy. While some of the report’s recommendations have since been rejected by ministers, it is essential reading because it shows us all what the woke bureaucrats at the epicentre of power think —and what they think is horrifying and Orwellian in equal measure. Some of what I’m about to write is, frankly, outrageous, something that would look more at home in North Korea than modern Britain. According to the leaked document, public claims of ‘two-tier policing’ —the idea that police treat some groups in British society more favourably than others—are “an extreme right-wing narrative”. That’s right. If you happened to ask why the police were so soft on anti-Semitic extremists and Islamist sympathisers marching through the streets of London but so tough on British people who protested about mass immigration then you are a “right-wing extremist”. What about discussing the rape gangs —the most horrific scandal in our entire national history, which has also been revealed in multiple independent reports? Well, according to woke bureaucrats in the Home Office, that’s “far-right” too. Right-wing extremists, they tell us, “frequently exploit” the rape of young white girls by organised Pakistani Muslim gangs —which the report actually describes as “alleged group-based sexual abuse” (!)—to promote “anti-Muslim sentiment”. Remember, this document wasn’t written years or decades ago —it was written by civil servants just a few months ago, after many investigations into the rape gangs... what matters more to woke state bureaucrats —as I’ve written before—is not protecting thousands of young white British girls from being raped and assaulted by organised anti-White Pakistani Muslim gangs but, instead, protecting minority groups from any perceived ‘emotional harm', in this case “Islamophobia”. Unbelievable. And that’s not all. Much like we saw in the aftermath of the immigration protests last summer, the report demands an increase in the recording of the deeply Orwellian “non-crime hate incidents”, whereby citizens have black marks put on their record merely for voicing or expressing alternative views and based on how others perceive those views, including what they might say or write in the privacy of their own homes. Worryingly, the report demands that a code of conduct that was introduced by the previous Tory government, which orders police to only record these totalitarian non-crime hate incidents if there is a “serious risk of harm”, is removed. In other words, woke bureaucrats at the heart of the British state want to make it even easier to chill if not stamp out free speech in modern Britain, leaving everybody fearful of what they say in case somebody else perceives it to be in any way “offensive”. The leaked report also makes clear that people who run the British state ultimately want to bring in a number of other deeply authoritarian measures. They want to give longer prison sentences to anybody convicted of violating similarly vague and authoritarian ‘hate laws’, which are used to try and control the national conversation and stigmatise views that challenge the Officially Approved Narrative. They want to brand what they call the ‘spreading of misinformation’ as another example of ‘extremism’ when, in reality, as we’ve seen in recent months, what the elite class defines as ‘misinformation’ often ends up being entirely correct information. It just so happens to be information the elite class don’t want to confront. Like all those people who wondered after the Southport atrocities whether they might have something to do with Islamist ideology, mass immigration, and importing countless young men from high conflict societies who are more prone to violence. At the time, they were criticised by Keir Starmer for sharing ‘misinformation’, and by his deputy Angela Rayner for sharing ‘fake news’ and ‘conspiracy theories’. But what many of them were saying, many of whom would now be severely punished by the state under these new draconian recommendations, was entirely correct. Would the state, for example, have punished Nigel Farage who was widely criticised at the time for spreading ‘conspiracy theories’ when what he suggested —that the truth was being withheld from the British people—also turned out to be entirely correct? And, much like Keir Starmer after Southport, state bureaucrats also want to adopt a much broader and even more vague definition of “extremism”, one that will clearly be used to silence and stigmatise entirely legitimate but also alternative views. Extremists, the report argues, should not be defined by specific ideologies, such as Islamism or the far right, but rather “behaviours and activity of concern”. What state bureaucrats want to do —and this is crucial— is move to what they call “a more harms-based approach”, based on the idea “that extremist ideologies alone do not always result in violence or harm”. Read between the lines. What it means is that the guiding priority here is to ensure that minorities do not experience emotional “harm” and so entirely non-violent views and ideas will be severely curtailed in order to protect minorities from this “harm”. This is Woke 101 —an ideology that will always sacrifice free speech, free expression, and our right to debate key issues in our society on the altar of protecting what it views as sacred minority groups from experiencing any “harm”. It is fundamentally illiberal and poses a major threat to our way of life. It’s all part of an attempt among the elite class to redefine “extremism” —to make it so broad and vague that it encompasses alternative but entirely legitimate views which happen to challenge the Officially Approved Narrative among this class. Critical of mass uncontrolled immigration? Sceptical of the visibly failing state policy of multiculturalism? Wondering if Islam really is compatible with the West, including its strong emphasis on free speech, individual rights, legal independence, and rights for sexual minorities? Want to talk about the industrial-scale rape of white girls by Pakistani Muslim gangs? Want to discuss the growing pile of evidence which makes clear that the state policy of mass, uncontrolled immigration is making us poorer, not richer? Well, congratulations. Welcome to the club. Because now, in the eyes of the state, you’re a right-wing extremist now."
The Prevent definition of concerns over cultural cohesion as "far right extremism" ties in to this
James Esses on X - "Here is Emily Maitlis making an accusation that the only reason a person would focus their time and attention on tackling Pakistani grooming gangs is because they are “racist”. The establishment media in the UK are a national disgrace."
Weird that we are told it doesn't matter that in the US, blacks kill each other infinitely more than the police kill them (usually for justified reasons), and only the latter is wrong because the state is supposed to protect people, but the UK establishment covering up and even enabling Pakistani grooming gangs is not a problem and if you are concerned about it, you are racist
Nicholas Lissack on X - "The Channel 4 documentary ‘Groomed: A National Scandal’ is horrifying—but essential viewing. Instead of pushing Adolescence into classrooms, Keir Starmer’s government should be showing this. At least it’s based in reality. We need a national inquiry now more than ever."
Anna McGovern on X - "Keir Starmer refused to appear in Channel 4’s documentary Groomed – yet pushed for schools to show Netflix’s Adolescence, a FICTIONAL drama. Labour has serious questions to answer, and Starmer’s silence says it all. The public deserves the truth."
Josh Howie on X - "One of the least examined aspects of the Muslim rape gangs is the complicity of family members and communities. Looks like Channel 4 have done a journalism."
kwilliam on X - "“I’m angry with the girls” says dad of Rotherham child rapists"
He blamed social services and said he didn't see it as rape
Mirror of video (with subtitles)
Meme - Emil Kirkegaard @KirkegaardEmil: "Would the normal American reader of NYTimes know about Rotherham rapes? Probably not. There were 5 articles about this from before this week, mostly from 2014. On the other hand, there were 700+ articles about Emmett Till, a Black teen who was killed 69 years ago."
i/o @eyeslasho: "Rotherham victims: 1,400
Emmett Till: 1
Rotherham: 10-15 years ago
Emmett Till: 69 years ago
NYT Rotherham articles: 5 before this week
NYT Emmett Till articles: 700
Rotherham reaction: Coverup
Emmett Till reaction: National monument created to commemorate
THE KEY:
Rotherham: White victims/non-white perps
Emmett Till: Non-white victim/white perps"
Dane on X - "250,000 WHITE British girls have been raped in the last 25 years, OVER 90% by Muslims - Lord Pearson in the House of Lords. The numbers are staggering, an absolutely Satanic presence overshadows all of the West, fueled by literal demons."
UK politics: Yvette Cooper says victims and survivors panel being set up after child abuse inquiry recommendations – as it happened - "The shadow home secretary Chris Philp has reiterated calls for a national inquiry, adding it is “not far-right to stand up for victims of mass rape”, Philp was met with shouts of “shame” from the Labour benches"
If you don't want white girls to be groomed and raped, that is "far right" nowadays
Kelvin MacKenzie on X - "Remarkable that Rupert Lowe has raised over £500K in no time at all to launch a private inquiry into Pakistani rape gangs. I presume Labour refuses such an inquiry for fear of upsetting Muslims and leading to more Islamic candidates standing against them. Starmer will take the knee but not the tough decisions."
Adam Wren on X - "In response to the conservatives rightfully questioning the horrific job that Labour is doing on their ‘inquiry’ she stands up and says “as someone with Muslim family please stop vilifying the muslims” and asks for the gov to crack down on free speech, are you fucking kidding me"
Connor Tomlinson on X - ""Yes, children were raped, tortured, and murdered while their abusers shouted racial slurs and verses from the Quran at them. But have you considered that I am offended?""
Jailing Muslims who have committed crimes is Islamophobic
Andrew Neil on X - "Labour has shelved what limited inquiries it was prepared to mount into the industrial scale child abuse by Pakistani-heritage rape gangs over several decades. It is fitting that this shameful surrender was made by vacuous ministerial show pony Jess Phillips, who announced it as Parliament was heading for Easter recess and the media’s eyes were on Trump tariffs. A good day to bury bad news if ever there was one. Why this abject abandoning of a Labour government’s responsibilities? Simple. Pure party self-interest. First, any investigation would merely confirm that Labour local authorities looked the other way for years and failed to prevent the most heinous abuse. Phillips admitted the change of course was in response to local authority lobbying. Second, it is too toxic for Labour. Any investigation would confirm that the evil perpetrators in the rape/grooming gangs were overwhelmingly Muslims of Asian origin, a vital part of Labour’s electoral base with which it is already in trouble for not being sufficiently robust over Gaza. So best draw a veil over it all, even at the expense of vulnerable, abused young women never getting proper justice or closure. Unforgivable."
Meme - Basil the Great @Basil_TGMD: "Labour have sold our girls for votes. It's that simple."
"Labour 'dropped grooming gangs inquiries to avoid offending Pakistanis'. Sir Trevor Phillips says Government's response to scandal is 'utterly shameful' and 'obviously political'"
Labour ‘dropped grooming gangs inquiries to avoid offending Pakistanis’ - "Sir Trevor, the former chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said Labour’s response to the grooming gangs scandal was “utterly shameful” because it was “so obviously political” to avoid offending a particular demographic of voters. The broadcaster, who previously stood to be a Labour candidate for London mayor, said the move risked providing an “open goal” to Right-wing critics of the party’s policies on immigration. His comments came after the Government dropped a commitment to provide £5 million to support up to five initial inquiries modelled on the previous judge-led one into grooming gangs in Telford. Jess Phillips, a Home Office minister, announced that “following feedback” the Government would adopt a “flexible approach” where the money would be available for local councils to use as they wished to support grooming gang work... “I think part of the problem is that the centre-Left has put all sorts of barriers around what it can talk about, what it may speak out about. “In the same way as we have this problem here, in the United States, the Democrats have had almost nothing to say about, for example, immigration, had nothing very much to say about some of the barriers on freedom of speech on campuses and so on, because they’re embarrassed by it. “And it has presented an absolute open goal to people like Trump and JD Vance [the US vice-president]. That’s the problem.”"
Basil the Great on X - "Why is anyone surprised Labour have cancelled the few grooming gang inquiries they planned to do. This was Jess Phillips attitude to the mass molestation of women in Cologne by migrant men, she compared it to an average night out in Birmingham. This government are evil."
Meme - "At least @jessphillips kept her word here."
Jess Phillips: "Next time any government minister tells you that violence against women and girls is a priority for them. Don't believe them. It isn't they literally don't give a toss."
Thread by @elonmusk on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "In the UK, serious crimes such as rape require the Crown Prosecution Service's approval for the police to charge suspects. Who was the head of the CPS when rape gangs were allowed to exploit young girls without facing justice? Keir Starmer, 2008 -2013 Who is the boss of Jess Phillips right now? Keir Stamer. The real reason she's refusing to investigate the rape gangs is that it would obviously lead to the blaming of Keir Stamer (head of the CPS at the time)."
Ex-Labour chairman 'told me not to raise grooming gang ethnicity to keep votes' - "The former chairman of Labour’s parliamentary party warned that drawing attention to the ethnicity of grooming gangs could harm the party’s electoral chances, the ex-MP for Rochdale has claimed. Simon Danczuk, who represented the town from 2010 to 2017, said he was “threatened” by Tony Lloyd, who was campaigning to be the Greater Manchester police and crime commissioner at the time... he was told by two Labour MPs – Mr Lloyd and Jim Dobbin, the MP for the neighbouring seat of Heywood and Middleton – not to link the scandal to the perpetrators’ ethnicity... “The current MP for Rochdale, Tony Lloyd, who then represented Manchester Central, made attempts within Parliament to disassociate the grooming scandal from the Asian Muslim community – that is a matter of public record. He also said privately to me that the links should not be highlighted. “When Tony became Greater Manchester police commissioner and I continued to raise the poor performance of the local police (and calling for the resignation of the Chief Constable, in an article for the Mail on Sunday) with regard to grooming and publicly called into question Tony’s performance, he phoned and threatened me. “He said that if I ever repeated such comments he would ‘bounce me from Rochdale to Westminster’. My wife at the time was present when I took the call."
Teenage rape victim told 'that is what white girls were for', jury hears : r/gbnews - "You can’t commit hate crime if you’re a minority. Don’t you know this country has two tier laws now?"





