End Wokeness on X - "Oxford Union's new president calls the right "cancers" that must be taken out "BY ANY NECESSARY MEANS" He celebrated Charlie's execution"
So much for you can only demonise people you don't know
Meme - Will Tanner @Will_Tanner_1: "They want us dead and think it's funny"
"Oxford Union president-elect launches new attack on Charlie Kirk as he says: 'My words were no less insensitive than his'"
vittorio: "> Oxford Union president
> doesn't know the difference between "less" and "more"
Makes sense"
"From his Linkedin: I was tasked with completing a littony of objectives and sessions"
Clearly, he got into Oxford despite substandard grades because of his brilliance, which grades cannot capture
Alex Armstrong on X - "Oxford won’t expel the Union President who celebrated the murder of Charlie Kirk. They WILL consider expelling students who stand up to trans ideology. Don’t send your kids to Oxford."
Poppy Coburn on X - "“Sorry I laughed about a man I had debated weeks before having his neck shot apart by an assassin on a college campus, but here’s why he was actually a horrible person”. Not really a remorseful statement from the incoming Oxford Union president"
Sam Ashworth-Hayes on X - "Poor from the incoming president of the Oxford Union.
Effectively: people reporting on what I said means I'm being discriminated against; I'm a victim; hold other people accountable for "rhetoric that has caused real harm" instead.
Standard Left playbook."
Gad Saad on X - "The reason that he is doubling down is because he has never been scolded for poor behavior or shoddy ideas throughout his education. He is protected by his identity so he is akin to the child who goes on temper tantrums without ever being reprimanded. He is now surprised by the backlash and he double downs via the unearned chutzpah that he has used to ascend to places that he did not earn. He is a gargantuan schmuck. @OxfordUnion should be ashamed of themselves. To think that Sir Winston Churchill spoke at that platform and this lobotomized degenerate now serves as its president-elect. Oh boy..."
Sophie Corcoran on X - "My twin (who said I can post this)
Got rejected from the same Oxford college as temu Jack sparrow despite having A*A*A* prediction, achieving A*A*A whilst playing football for Leyton orient and doing international marching band and working. He got in with ABB. This is the unfairness that talented white people are having to face and it’s wrong"
Gad Saad on X - "Please be decent to the president-elect of @OxfordUnion who has the decorum of a drunken sailor, the sartorial elegance of a pyjama-clad degenerate, and the intellectual acuity of my socks. Sure he might have celebrated the assassination of @charliekirk11 BUT he is black, so lay off him. He is the real victim here. #BLM"
James Esses on X - "I will always defend free speech. My issue with George Abaraonye and the Oxford Union is this: How can a person be fit to run a Debating Union, if he believes that differences of opinion are fairly resolved via bullets?"
Michelle Dewberry on X - "Respectfully-Aren’t you missing the point? It’s not that he said something ‘offensive’. The question is: If you think it’s ok for someone to be shot dead, because you couldn’t defeat them in debate, or disagree with their views - should you be presiding over a debating society? The answer to that is surely: No. Isn’t this just basic common sense? 🤔"
I've been told that being a debater doesn't mean you need to believe in freedom of speech
Mike Jones on X - "The Oxford student who cheered Kirk’s death on WhatsApp - despite having debated him in person - is essentially a token diversity admit. ABB isn’t really good enough for an elite university. And if you look at his extra-curriculars, a very telling pattern emerges: soft guff like “cultural awareness,” welfare officer (!), and, of course, racial and ethnic minorities rep. He’s learned how The System works, and he’s gamed it brilliantly. But now that he’s slipped up, it’s time to make him famous... just not in the way he imagined."
Thread by @jamespriceglos on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "I have resigned as the honorary secretary of the Oxford Literary Debating & Union Trust, the charity that owns the @OxfordUnion’s buildings, and dispenses its charitable responsibilities onto the Union as its delegate. The callousness of the Union’s President-Elect has shocked me, but I also can't accept the lack of intervention on the issue. The trust is full of the most incredible people. I hope this ultimately helps, in a tiny way, a great British institution that I care so much about.
Unfortunately, it appears that the President-Elect has further rowed back any apology by saying that what he said was no worse than what Mr Kirk has said."
I was once Oxford Union president. I no longer recognise what it has become - "For some years, free speech has been a cause celebre of the Right. I have even written a piece in The Telegraph defending it, in the context of an attempt by students to cancel a controversial speaker at the Oxford Union. Some will therefore accuse me of hypocrisy in calling for George Abaraonye, the President-Elect, to be removed from his position. This is the wrong reading, however. I do not think Mr Abaraonye should be punished by the law for expressing his horrible views; I do not even think he should be sent down from university. But the right to free assembly is every bit as important as free expression; indeed in some ways it is the same thing. A private organisation has the right to order its affairs as it wishes, and should be free to remove those who contravene rules or customs. The ability of institutions to self-govern in accordance with societal norms is crucial to them maintaining respect and relevance, and keeping the state from meddling in its affairs. An institution as well-known and newsworthy as the Oxford Union has a responsibility to do just this. Allowing someone who has praised “violent retaliation” and appeared to make comments mocking the shooting of a man (someone he himself stood across in the Union just months ago) who engaged in public discourse, to remain as head of the world’s most prestigious debating society, is not acceptable. You would not suffer the head of a cancer charity to be rooting for the tumours. Further, my right to write this, and try to encourage the President-Elect to resign, is also part of the process by which society tries to regulate its affairs... this kind of institutional capture, by those who dismiss their inherent value, is a much broader and more concerning trend than just this student debating society. Just as the socialist Left has learned to take over institutions (the Church of England and the BBC spring to mind) and the Muslim Brotherhood have taught how to gain influence for Islamist ideas via the same mechanism, so too are new radicals using both our institutions and our freedoms against us. As I said in my resignation letter, radical groupings “merely wear our precious freedoms as a costume until they can use them to attack that which is sacred to us.” You believe in freedom of assembly, don’t you? So you cannot object to Gaza marches spewing hate clogging our streets every Saturday. You believe in free speech? So you must allow someone justifying “violent retaliation” and glorying in assassination to remain President of a debate club. You believe in democracy? So you must allow for recent arrivals to vote en masse for Members of Parliament who care exclusively about Palestine and similar causes. I feel bitterly bad about leaving the trustees in the lurch, but it is becoming existential for guardians of civil society to realise that we have allowed the old world of shared norms and institutions to wither; if we aren’t radical in reasserting those time-honoured customs, they will be lost to those who don’t even care. At least Mr Abaraonye is honest about this. He said (in a debate in the Union, of course): “To effectively create change in the world we desire… at times there is simply nothing else that can be required other than violent retaliation. And this is a view I wholeheartedly agree with: the view that some institutions are too broken, too oppressive to be reformed. Like cancers of our society, they must, and they should be taken down by any means necessary.” We have been conditioned into learned helplessness by being told there is nothing we can do in a Left-liberal society to conserve those institutions we care about. It is time for us to reject this notion. As Charlie Kirk would say, we are at a turning point. We must choose the right direction."
Oxford Union president to face ‘disciplinary proceedings’ over Charlie Kirk messages - "200 life members of the debating society – former Oxford University students who have paid to retain their membership – have expressed their willingness to support a vote of no confidence in Mr Abaraonye’s leadership. This surpasses the 150 signatures required to bring no-confidence proceedings"
Basil the Great on X - "🚨NEWS: The Oxford Union have written a letter claiming the criticism of President Elect George Abaraonye for celebrating Charlie Kirk's murder is driven by racism Why are they doing this?"
Photos of 'person of interest' in assassination of Charlie Kirk released by FBI as manhunt continues - "Ammunition used to assassinate Charlie Kirk was engraved with transgender and antifascist messages, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal. The publication said the information came from a source familiar with the investigation and a law enforcement bulletin. The ammunition with “expressions” espousing transgender and antifascist ideologies was found inside the rifle."
Kirk Lubimov on X - "Jordan Peterson criticized the government and transgender radicalization and was mandated to go through re-education if he wants to work in Canada again and was essentially chased out of the country. Nurse Amy Hamm was fired and fined because she exposed trans activists trying to changes our medical system, men cannot be women and that women need safe spaces of their own. Meanwhile we have politicians, professors, and others who are celebrating Charlie Kirk's death and rationalizing it, and nothing happens to them. A couple placed on a leave until this blows over. Our institutions are already have two tier systems based on ideologies and it will only continue until one gets eradicated."
Matt Van Swol on X - "A man on this app "quoted" Charlie Kirk so grotesquely and so incorrectly, I offered him $10,000 if he could find me video footage of him saying it, word for word. Instead, he made his account private."
Thread by @charliekirk11 on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "This is defamation and libel. We will sue unless it is corrected. Left wing rags like the SacBee are allowed to platform lies against conservatives and get away with it. Time for lawfare.
Here's THE TRUTH
Swimmer Riley Gaines joined my show and told how Lia Thomas exposed himself in the girls' locker room. I said we "should go back to the 50s and 60s" meaning local law enforcement would have interceded, or parents would have boycotted the event. I NEVER once used the word "lynching" nor did it even cross my mind. In fact, I called specifically for PEACE, but they don't want you to see that part. Watch the FULL interaction:"
Left wingers lying again? Quelle surprise
Charlie Kirk Was Assassinated for the Same Opinions I Hold - "Charlie’s critics would have you believe he was “far-right”. Actually, he was nothing of the sort. Charlie Kirk was a vanilla conservative. He believed in the right to life, traditional marriage, merit over race, secure borders, and small government. He was also a passionate defender of free speech and open debate... Charlie Kirk loved debate because he hated violence. He believed America’s deep cultural and spiritual problems could be resolved by giving a hearing to even the worst ideas and persuading people with the truth. In a video that’s gone viral since his death, he explains that he toured American colleges persuading young people because “when people stop talking, that’s when you get violence, that’s when civil war happens”... Killing Charlie — and offering a defence for his death, as many have done — is a terrible tactical error if you claim to prefer peaceful politics. And doing so while he was engaged in the very act of debating? There’s nothing more cynical. As many have observed, the bullet shot by Charlie’s assassin was the ultimate confession that his ideas were better — able only to be countered by brute force. I’ve been told the reason Donald Trump is so bitterly hated is because he’s rude, bombastic, spiteful to his enemies, and a hypocrite for defending Christian values despite an obviously un-Christian past. Charlie Kirk safely avoids all such accusations. He was a loving and faithful husband, a father adored by his two children, a steadfast leader, and a man praised even by his enemies. Yet he was assassinated anyway... Conservatives have been dehumanised in elite circles for decades. “They get bitter and cling to guns or religion,” Barack Obama scoffed in 2008. During her 2016 White House run, Hillary Clinton derided Trump’s base as a “basket of deplorables… racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it”. Joe Biden, on the campaign trail in 2018, called them “the dregs of society”. From there, the rhetoric only escalated. During Biden’s infamous Red Speech in 2022, he declared “MAGA Republicans” — of whom Charlie Kirk was undeniably a figurehead — a “threat to democracy” and to “the very foundations of our republic”. By this time, an entire genre of bloodthirsty discourse was flooding the internet. I have documented dozens of examples of it here. Yes, anyone can find examples of untempered speech on both sides of politics, but the uncomfortable truth for US Democrats is that it’s coming not from their fringes but their frontlines. Donors, celebrities, congressmen, media pundits and more queued up to call Trump a Nazi, a fascist, and Hitler reincarnate right up to the moment an assassin almost felled him in the fields of Butler, Pennsylvania. And after a brief pause of national reflection, they resumed the name-calling in earnest... A student who witnessed Charlie Kirk’s assassination reported that a group of his opponents in the crowd cheered when he was shot. Talking heads in the legacy media indulged in ritual victim-blaming, suggesting that Charlie had invited his own demise by the views he expressed. BlueSky, a platform widely billed as the left’s compassionate alternative to X, was reportedly a hotbed of hate this week — Daily Wire journalist Megan Basham said that upon searching for Charlie Kirk’s name, every single post “was either laughing at, sneering at, or suggesting there was something ironic in his death”. Matt Walsh, a conservative commentator with a profile almost up there with Charlie’s, displayed a rash of screenshots from left-leaning accounts calling for his murder next. Chris Rufo, a conservative activist not often given to hyperbole, mourned Friday that “the number of people celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death who work as teachers, nurses, psychologists, social workers, and other ‘helping professions’ is immensely disturbing”. Once again, the spite is coming not just from the margins but the mainstream. When George Floyd died, Congressional Democrats donned African kente stoles and bowed low at his golden casket. When Charlie Kirk was shot, Republicans requested a moment of prayer in the House and prominent Democrats booed and hissed at the suggestion. Similar scenes unfolded in parliaments across the Western world, where “progressive” leaders indulged partisanship over humanity. In the European Parliament, Polish MEP Dominik Tarczyński requested a minute of silence for Charlie Kirk and was shouted down. In New Zealand’s parliament, the Greens and Labour blocked a motion for the same. Some of the most obscene displays took place here in Australia. Former NSW Premier Bob Carr went on a Twitter tirade against Charlie Kirk’s political views while his body was still warm. Former Labor staffer Dr Adam Carr declared “death to fascists”. “I hate Charlie Kirk,” social media personality Abbie Chatfield assured her fans, even if his murder was “bad for everyone”. Satirical news outfit The Chaser — founded by the taxpayer-funded ABC — gloated over Charlie’s death with this disgusting headline. Perhaps the worst remarks came from 26-year-old media darling Hannah Ferguson, who recently interviewed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and enjoys ready access to the National Press Club. She gleefully justified Charlie’s assassination... Charlie Kirk never spoke this way about his ideological opponents. But he did ruthlessly critique their twisted worldview. And given how they’ve responded to his murder, you can see why he felt the need to."
Germany’s reaction to Charlie Kirk’s killing was beyond disturbing - "here in Germany, the response of the media class was even more disturbing. They seemed to revel in it. Instead of uniting in condemnation, major outlets reached immediately for the smear. Der Tagesspiegel, Berlin’s leading newspaper, ran the headline “Death of an Arsonist”, portraying Kirk not as a victim of murder but as some kind of extremist who had perhaps had it coming. State broadcaster ZDF allowed its chief correspondent, Elmar Thewessen, to claim – falsely – that Kirk had called for “stoning homosexuals”. And then came the digital chorus of mockery: T-Online’s Lars Wienand quipped, “Part of Liberty? Maybe this shocking murder will make the US Right rethink its gun laws”. Felix Schulz, spokesman for the Left-wing die Linke party’s leader, tossed out a meme reading, “Oh no! Anyway”. The comedian Sebastian Hotz (“El Hotzo”), a darling of public service satire, posted a famous TV chimpanzee named “Charly” with the caption “Rest in Peace”. Even when the country’s most decorated presenters attempted solemnity, the mask slipped. On ZDF heute journal, the fortress of Germany’s mainstream media, presenter Dunja Hayali began: “Kirk’s murder cannot be justified by anything”. A decent start. But then, in the same breath, she reminded viewers that Kirk was guilty of “abhorrent, racist, sexist and misanthropic statements”, branding him a “radical-religious conspiracy adherent”. This seems to be the journalistic trick: pose as balanced, then twist the knife. The result? Millions of ordinary Germans, who take prime-time anchors at their word, are invited to conclude that while murder is technically bad, this particular victim was barely human in the first place... This is a sign of how far the political mainstream in Germany has drifted Leftwards. It is no longer enough to oppose your adversaries. They must be delegitimised, dehumanised, treated not as mistaken citizens but as moral outcasts. Conservatives are no longer simply wrong; they are wicked, even “fascists”. And if they are wicked, then what happens to them is of little consequence. A society that cannot even pause to mourn the death of a man who dedicated himself to free speech has lost its moral bearings. We see the same dynamic in other debates in Germany. In the Israel–Palestine conflict, large sections of Germany’s Left have chosen to align themselves with Islamist extremists. What unites them is not love of Palestinians but hatred of Israel and, more broadly, of the West and its moral compass itself. Jewish students in Berlin are now reporting that they feel unsafe on campus. Israeli restaurants are being boycotted. Demonstrations routinely feature calls for the destruction of Israel, while the police are left paralysed by politicians who fear being accused of racism if they intervene too firmly. Once again, the mainstream shrugs, or worse, finds excuses. And Friedrich Merz, the chancellor, looks like a turned-over tortoise when not finding the right words. The parallel is obvious. Just as Kirk’s murder is rationalised by citing his supposed sins, so too is open menace against Jews excused as the “unfortunate by-product” of “oppression”. The logic is the same: our values – free speech, the sanctity of life, Israel’s right to exist – apply only when the “right” side commits the violence. It is moral relativism dressed up as sophistication, and it is political poison. And ordinary Germans see it. They see double standards, indulgence of left-wing thuggery, contempt for common sense. And increasingly, they turn to the one party that at least voices their anger – the AfD. By treating dissent as illegitimate, by excusing violence when it suits, Germany’s elites are nurturing precisely the beast they claim to fear most. Every smear instead of debate, every indulgence of extremism instead of confrontation, drives voters further into the AfD’s arms... Germany’s establishment congratulates itself on “defending democracy” by excluding the AfD. In reality, it is laying the groundwork for that party’s advance. The famous Brandmauer, an informal agreement by mainstream parties not to work with or form coaltions with the AfD, is collapsing. Not because of some master strategy by AfD leaders, but because Germany’s mainstream has abandoned the basic values that once bound society together. Charlie Kirk died for his belief that words, not bullets, should settle political disputes. Germany’s media elite could not even bring themselves to honour that conviction. Instead, they applauded the silencing of a man who did nothing more dangerous than challenge his opponents. If this is the moral standard of the German mainstream, then its democratic future is far darker than its leaders dare to admit."
Bob Vylan accused of inciting pogrom at Amsterdam concert - "A member of the rap duo Bob Vylan has been accused of “inciting a pogrom” during a concert in Amsterdam. On Saturday the singer, whose real name is Pascal Robinson-Foster, led the crowd in another chant of “death, death to the IDF”. The De Telegraaf newspaper reported that he went on to shout: “F--- the fascists, f--- the Zionists. Go find them in the streets.” The singer also celebrated the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, announcing to the audience, “I wanna dedicate this next one to an absolute piece of s--t of a human being. The pronouns was/were”. “Cos if you chat s---, you will get banged,” he continued, which means that those who disagree with him will be violently attacked. He then made a gun symbol with his hands, and 1,500 fans cheered in delight. “Rest in p--s, Charlie Kirk, you piece of s---,” he shouted in front of a large Palestine flag. The incident occurred at the Paradiso Grote Zaal, which defended both Robinson-Foster’s celebration of Kirk’s murder and the call for the death of those serving in the Israeli military. The venue released a statement on Sunday saying it “believed in the power of artistic freedom”. “Music – and especially punk – is an art form that traditionally magnifies anger, discontent, and injustice without a filter,” it continued. “In a world on fire, artists sometimes choose language that sounds confrontational or violent.”"
Good luck with artistic freedom if you oppose the left wing agenda
Rudy W. Giuliani on X - "Your own words, according to first hand video: "If you talk sh*t, you get banged." You are literally justifying the idea of shooting anyone ["you get banged"] who says something you disagree with ["if you talk shit"]. I've never heard of you before seeing this video, but presumably you have a massive following. How irresponsible and dangerous for you to utter such words to your fans (Notice the crowd cheers in response). Your plea to "calm down" is not enough. You should totally renounce your own words endorsing murder against those you disagree with, or be completely and irreparably ostracized from society, because spreading the message that murder is an acceptable avenue to silencing free speech is dangerous and destabilizing to us all."
Of course, to left wingers, celebrating Charlie Kirk's death and threatening that anyone else who threatens the left wing agenda will be murdered is criticising him and being insufficiently reverent of him
Bob Vylan gig in Netherlands cancelled after frontman makes comments about death of Charlie Kirk
Leftists cheering Charlie Kirk killing are ‘evil’ says pundit’s final debating partner - "The university student who was debating Charlie Kirk in the moment he was assassinated has labelled those cheering his death “disturbing” and “evil”. Hunter Kozak, a 29-year-old student, had challenged the conservative commentator on his views on transgender killers and mass shootings just before Kirk was killed by a single bullet. In an interview with Channel 5 news, a non-partisan YouTube-based outlet, Mr Kozak said: “I get so angry at these ‘wannabe activists’, these a---holes, these disturbing, evil [people]”. Mr Kozak, a progressive who broadly disagreed with Kirk’s views continued: “It does sometimes feel like I’m one of the few, definitely not the only, but certainly in a minority on the Left, that still cares about life or family or America.” The maths undergraduate at Utah Valley University, where Kirk was killed, said he felt those cheering the assassination were “terminally online” and had lost the ability to disagree with political opponents while still seeing them as human."
