Tyler Robinson, 22, facing capital murder and weapons charges: Details emerge about alleged Charlie Kirk assassin - "family members said Robinson had become “more political in recent years,” expressed negative views of Kirk and told family members he believed the Turning Point USA founder was “full of hate and spreading hate,” Cox said."
Left wing venom has very real consequences
Of course on Bluesky people are spreading lies as usual
Ian Miles Cheong on X - "What we know about Tyler Robinson, 22, the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk:
•His family says he turned to left-wing activism and rejected the values he was raised with, expressed intensely anti-conservative views at a recent family dinner
•Active in Antifa Discord servers.
•Convinced himself Charlie Kirk was a “fascist” who was “spreading hate.”
•Left Antifa slogans and rhetoric at the crime scene.
•Son of a sheriff—the same father who turned him in when it was evident he was the killer."
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧🎗 on X - ""Bella Ciao" and a Bullet: How the Left's Anthem Became a Murderer's Manifesto
The assassin now has a name. Tyler Robinson, 22, a young man radicalised not in the backstreets of Raqqa but in the lecture halls, forums, and online echo chambers of the Western Left. He has confessed his hatred of Charlie Kirk, describing him as "spreading hate." He etched slogans onto his bullets - a grotesque mix of Marxist chants and juvenile slurs - and carried out what he believed was an act of righteousness. One casing bore the words "O bella ciao" - the old Italian partisan anthem, once sung by communist resistance fighters against Mussolini. Today it is the soundtrack of radical Left marches from Europe to Gaza. Robinson wasn't confused. He was declaring his allegiance to that tradition of revolutionary violence, dressing up assassination as "resistance." This was not random violence. It was the logical fruit of a poisonous ideology that has taken root in our institutions. Charlie Kirk warned us. He said that when debate is replaced with censorship, when one side is cast as evil, when speech itself is branded violence, then real violence follows. He knew universities were no longer places of learning but factories of radicalisation, where young minds are trained not to argue but to despise. And now he has paid with his life. Look at the response. Social media awash with progressives celebrating his death. Democrats sneering at prayers in his honour. European MPs refusing to stand for a moment's silence. The mask of civility has slipped. The Left cannot even mourn a murdered man, because to them he was never human in the first place - he was a "Nazi," a "bigot," a "fascist." Once dehumanised, his killing became not a tragedy, but a punchline. This is the culture the Left has built. They preach "be kind" while wielding hatred like a weapon. They posture about tolerance while branding their opponents "phobes," "deniers," extremists." Question gender dogma? You're a transphobe. Criticise mass migration? You're a racist. Support Israel? You're a genocidal maniac. It is a liturgy of labels, each one designed to silence. And now we see the end of that road: a bullet through the neck of a man who dared to speak. The radicalisation of Robinson is not an isolated failure. It is the product of a system. Schools that teach grievance instead of gratitude. Universities that prize activism over knowledge. Media that cheers every cancellation and smears dissent as "hate. A culture that whispers into every young ear: your opponents are not wrong, they are evil. They must not be debated, they must be destroyed. That is why the Left is now more dangerous than the fascism it claims to fight. Fascists and communists alike relied on the same method - dehumanise the opponent, justify violence, and call it justice. Today's progressives are no different. They are the new bigots, the new fanatics, the new censors. And they have convinced themselves they are virtuous while they build a culture where assassination can be cheered as activism. Charlie Kirk is dead. A husband, a father, a voice silenced not by reasoned opposition but by a young man raised on ideological poison. His killing is not just an attack on a conservative. It is an attack on the very possibility of democracy, because democracy cannot survive when one side replaces argument with murder. This is the warning. Once a society decides that speech is violence, violence itself will follow. And once political assassination is sanctified in the name of progress, no voice is safe. "The radicalisation of Robinson is not an isolated failure. It is the product of a system. Schools that teach grievance instead of gratitude. Universities that prize activism over knowledge. Media that cheers every cancellation and smears dissent as "hate."""
KenLFC on X - "Disturbing video of Charlie Kirk has surfaced where he said black people were better off in slavery and subjugation before the 1940’s. “It was bad & it was evil but they committed less crimes”. Thoughts on this? Happy #911Anniversary by the way. #CharlieKirkshot #Shooter"
Black-Guy™️ on X - "Since you are obviously too retarded to understand what he is saying, I’ll translate for you.
“Even under the cruelty and brutality of chattel slavery and in spite of it, the moral character of Blacks persevered.”
Had the dumb bitch he was sitting across from been capable of processing the implications of what he said, the profundity of it might have widened her perspective. The moral constitution of my people is broken today, but it wasn’t slavery that did it.
“In spite of the abject destitution that slavery necessitates, slaves didn’t resort to criminality. They opted to invest is honest trades and work rather than subsist on others through predation/criminality.”
The same cannot be said of their descendants who lean on hardship not suffered to excuse the criminality of their peers. Our ancestors weren’t simply humble Slaves because they struggled mightily. They were objectively at the bottom of society and yet they still aimed up, more than we even bother to do today.
Besides the point. Contextually and to Charlie’s point. If CHATTEL SLAVERY didn’t break the American Black in terms of his character, honor, community, connection to God, or his family, what precisely did?"
Left wingers always have very poor comprehension skills. Is this because of propagandisation, motivated reasoning or just because they're dumb?
Meme - Bad Hombre @joma_gc: "YOU, Brian Tyler Cohen, spent the past two weeks falsely accusing and broadcasting to your 610,000 followers on X that Charlie Kirk was an “obedient dog working to cover up a pedophile ring,” and now you want to act like you’re horrified at the consequences of your rhetoric."
"Charlie got his marching orders and he's being a good obedient boy. Nice work helping cover for pedophiles Charlie"
"Good boy Charlie. Very good boy. Keep deflecting from Epstein with a mAjOr ScAnDaL about Clinton. The pedophiles are very grateful for you. Good boy."
"Not Charlie Kirk admitting that his job is doing PR for the administration that's currently covering up a pedophile ring."
"Charlie Kirk is now actively helping cover up a pedophile ring. Disgusting."
"Remember when @charliekirk11 said to trust his friends in the government? Good boy Charlie-the pedophiles are grateful for your service."
"Pretty amazing to see how compliant this mouthpiece was just a few hours ago serving this slop to the GOP base to distract from Trump's presence in the Epstein files. My only hope is that everyone could one day have a dog as loyal as Charlie. Good boy, Charlie. Good boy."
Meme - Reddit Lies @reddit_lies: "Redditors on r/ToiletPaperUSA are celebrating Charlie Kirk's assassination."
"Video makes it look like this is a serious, life-altering shot he took. Very easily could end up dying. Maybe don't spew unjustified hate your whole life? Just a thought."
"Two in the Thoughts, one in the Prayers"
"Okay. Yay"
"My response is, fannnnnntastic"
"If you call for the extermination of people long enough someone will finally stop it."
"Mods please add a bullet hole to the subreddit icon"
"*crabs* crab rave time"
"YOOOOOO, LET'S GOOOOOOOO"
"Hopefully he'll take comfort from the fact that this proves he was right all along - the answer really is a good guy with a gun!"
"Spew violence and hate, and you reap what you sow."
Left wing logic: if you disagree with the left wing agenda, you are spreading "hate" and deserve to be killed
Meme - Laura Powell @LauraPowellEsq: "Two days ago, this outlet promoted paying a witch to curse Charlie Kirk to make him be on the receiving end of hatred. Now they disavow themselves of the consequences of their rhetoric. The media has blood on its hands."
"We Paid Some Etsy Witches to Curse Charlie Kirk"
"Editor's Note: This story was published on September 8. Jezebel condemns the shooting of Charlie Kirk in the strongest possible terms. We do not endorse, encourage, or excuse political violence of any kind."
Meme - Robert Sterling @RobertMSterling: "Bluesky is reacting exactly like you would have expected"
"Thoughts and prayers you Nazi bitch. Hope the bullet's okay after touching Charlie"
"LOL SOMEONE SHOT CHARLIE KIRK"
"WAIT THEY ACTUALLY MERKED CHARLIE KIRK? CHARLIE MERK? LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOO"
If you disagree with the left wing agenda, you're a Nazi and deserve to be killed
Meme - "Bluesky sociologist is trying to link Gamergate to the assasination of Charlie Kirk"
Nicole Bedera: "In 2014, Anita Sarkeesian canceled an event at Utah State after a credible assassination threat because the school's response was that Utah allows guns on college campuses. People have warned about this kind of violence for years. But they weren't the people the powers at be wanted to protect. For anyone who may not remember, Anita Sarkeesian was one of the feminist journalists subjected to harassment and violence as part of Gamergate. And once again, I'm always struck by how often we see echoes of the way we treated Gamergate in today's politics."
Meme - Ian Miller @ianmSC: "Remember, Bluesky was created because the political left said Elon Musk was allowing "hateful rhetoric" to spread on Twitter/X"
Tim Urban @waitbutwhy: "Every post on Bluesky is celebrating the assassination. Such unbelievably sick people."a>
BlindFaithBook on X - "Those who left X for Bluesky didn't do so because they were being censored. They did so because X would no longer censor their opponents. Which brings us to Charle Kirk... 😢"
Rep. Ilhan Omar cruelly stomps on conservative activist Charlie Kirk's legacy: 'Full of s--t' - "“Squad” Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) went on a cruel rant about murdered conservative activist Charlie Kirk, scoffing at the notion that his core mission was to have a civil debate on politics. “There are a lot of people who are talking about him [Kirk] just wanting to have a civil debate,” Omar sneered to progressive outlet Zeteo. “These people are full of s— and it’s important for us to call them out while we feel anger and sadness.”... “There is nothing more f—ed up than to pretend that his words and actions haven’t been recorded and in existence for the last decade or so,” she added, further accusing Kirk of posting “hateful rhetoric” on social media. Omar is far from the only Democrat or public official to have voiced an unsympathetic view of Kirk’s murder... Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker laid blame on President Trump for the conservative activist’s death. “Political violence unfortunately has been ratcheting up in this country,” Pritzker told reporters, referencing the recent murder of Minnesota’s Democratic House speaker. “I think there are people who are fomenting it in this country — I think the president’s rhetoric often foments it,” the Democratic governor continued. “We’ve seen the January 6th rioters who clearly have tripped a new era of political violence,” Pritzker added, making no mention of the two assassination attempts against Trump... The lower the office, the lower the discourse. “A lot of good people died today. Charlie Kirk wasn’t one of them,” Michael Kilbane, city council president of Fairview Park, Ohio, wrote in a ghoulish Facebook post. Even those sworn to protect celebrated Kirk’s death. “If you are Mourning this guy .. delete me. He spewed hate and racism on his show,” read a Facebook post from Secret Service agent Anthony Pough... A Marine Corps recruiter was fired after posting an image of Kirk on Instagram with the caption: “Another racist man popped.”... A Toledo Fire Department battalion chief described the shooting as “totally preventable and avoidable if not for the policies and beliefs of people like” Kirk and “his uneducated hateful ilk.” “Wish the guy was a better shot,” the unhinged fireman continued. “Charlie Kirk offers nothing but hate and division to society.” “No one would miss him and discourse would be better without him.”... Several public school teachers could also end up on the receiving end of red marks for despicable comments related to Kirk’s assassination. AnneMarie Donahue, a teacher at Wachusett Regional High School in Massachusetts, was placed on leave after Libs of TikTok uncovered an Instagram post where she boasted: “We’re NOT offering sympathy.”... In Florida, Lee County School District Commissioner Anastasios Kamoutsas vowed to investigate “every educator who engages in this vile, sanctionable behavior.” The commissioner’s statement followed a report from local outlet FOX 4 on a district employee’s social media post, which read: “What’s that about the cost of the second amendment being ‘some gun deaths every year,’ Bye Charlie.” The teacher’s post included waving and fire emojis. The NFL’s Carolina Panthers axed the team’s communications coordinator for insensitive social media posts, including one alluding to Kirk’s manner of death, the Charlotte Observer reported. The former employee, Charlie Rock, shared rap group Wu-Tu Clan’s song “Protect Ya Neck” along with a video of Kirk captioned: “Why are yall sad? Your mad said it was worth it …”"
As left wingers appropriately project, "the cruelty is the point. And they idolise The Squad, so
Left wingers are still claiming that everyone on the left is all full of kindness over his death. As usual they live in a parallel dimension
Meme - "A professor from the University of Victoria in BC celebrates the assassination of Charlie Kirk"
Melia Belli Bose: "FAFO Charlie. GOOD RIDDANCE! The "woke radical left" finally sent someone with good aim."
"Position. Associate Professor
Art History & Visual Studies
Area of expertise: Visual cultures of earty modern and contemporary South Asia"
emily is in sf on X - "Charlie Kirk’s positions were actually fairly moderate. And yet they killed him for them and celebrated the murder. If you or your loved ones held those beliefs, they would do the same to you without remorse."
Ranthony on X - "Sorry but "black people are too dumb too fly planes" and "slavery was good for black people" arent moderate positions"
Lauren Chen on X - "The left will lie about your opinions and then use it as justification for your murder."
CBC defends “hate expert” who claimed Charlie Kirk called for queer people to be executed - "the CBC is defending its decision to host “hate expert” Barbara Perry during a live broadcast, who falsely claimed that Kirk called for queer people to be “executed.” Perry, the director of the Center on Hate Bias and Extremism at Ontario Tech University in Oshawa, Ontario, was platformed by the CBC as a “hate expert” to analyze the assassination of Kirk during a broadcast Thursday morning, one day after Kirk’s murder. Perry used the moments after the suspected politically motivated killing of Kirk at Utah Valley University on Wednesday to raise concerns that leftists could face vilification following the attack. She also claimed that Charlie Kirk called “queer” people “defective and dangerous and should be exterminated,” which there is no record of him ever doing... “Mr. Kirk has expressed that the bible verse Leviticus 20.13, which does endorse the execution of homosexuals, ‘serves as God’s perfect law when it comes to sexual matters,’” Kelly claimed in an email. The quote refers to a video where Kirk reacted to statements made by children’s show YouTuber “Miss Rachel,” where she quoted the Bible during Pride Month in 2024, saying Christians are called to “love thy neighbour.” In the segment referenced by the CBC, Kirk quoted a different verse from Leviticus to illustrate the problem with quoting scripture selectively, but did not advocate for queer people “to be executed” as Perry remarked. Additionally, Kirk said, “the chapter before affirms God’s perfect law,” not the specific verse quoted as CBC indicated... There is no record of Kirk calling for the execution of “queer people” nor calling all such people “defective or dangerous.” Kirk has long advocated for free and open discourse in a peaceful democracy."
Stephen King on X - "I apologize for saying Charlie Kirk advocated stoning gays. What he actually demonstrated was how some people cherry-pick Biblical passages."
Meme - Elon Musk @elonmusk: "Why would Stephen King post something so blatantly false?"
Dave Rubin: "Well he is a fiction writer."
Thread by @jonatanpallesen on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "I would probably spend at least 2 minutes investigating before I made such an unlikely accusation about someone who was just murdered for the perception of their opinions.
Also interesting that so many find this claim believable. The left really doesn't have an accurate idea of what most people on the right believe. The Westboro Baptist Church is not representative."
Meme - Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11: "This is your daily reminder that President Trump and Ambassador Ric Grennell have launched a worldwide effort to decriminalize homosexuality in 70+ countries where it's still illegal. Why doesn't he get any praise from the mainstream media for this courageous action?"
Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11: "lran has executed over 5,000 of its citizens for being homosexual. This is why @realDonaldTrump is fighting to decriminalize homosexuality across the world. Why are Democrats resisting this?"
Clear proof he was a homophobe who wanted gay people to be stoned
Meme - Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11: "I believe marriage is one man one woman. Also gay people should be welcome in the conservative movement. As Christians we are called to love everyone. I will always stand against people who wish to establish their own personal values as a reason to kick others out of our movement"
NYT Forced To Issue Correction After Making Egregiously False Claim About Charlie Kirk - "The New York Times issued a correction on Thursday after falsely accusing Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk of making an antisemitic claim on his podcast. The Times falsely accused Kirk of stating on his podcast in 2023 that Jewish communities are “pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites” that they want people to stop using against them. However, Kirk cited a tweet making that claim and critiqued it, causing the Times’ correction to be made. “An earlier version of this article described incorrectly an antisemitic statement that Charlie Kirk had made on an episode of his podcast. He was quoting a statement from a post on social media and went on to critique it. It was not his own statement,” the correction reads... In actuality, Kirk clarified that not all Jews are pushing hatred onto white people. He stated that certain communities have pushed it by supporting left-wing causes such as Black Lives Matter."
Left wing quote mining would make creationists proud. We see that with the Leviticus/stoning gays and empathy examples too
cbcwatcher on X - "What a difference 24 hours at CBC makes "prominent conservative commentator" becomes " far right activist Charlie Kirk" There is seriously something wrong with CBC activists"
CBC media bias is a far right conspiracy theory and misinformation
Josh Dehaas on X - "The problem is the double standard. CBC wouldn’t write “Angela Davis died - here are her controversial takes.” Or “Here are David Suzuki’s controversial takes.” Reporters used to know to avoid labelling one side’s position “controversial” since that’s for readers to decide."
Do you believe in traditional gender roles? You are "far-right" according to "analysis" by a CBC reporter by @cbcwatcher(cbcwatcher) - "Do you believe in traditional gender roles? You are "far-right" according to "analysis" by a CBC reporter. CBC reporter now says Kirk's belief in "traditional gender roles" makes him "far right". A "Ph.D. candidate at" UofT says these were "simplistic and traditional views Kirk embraced"
"...far-right beliefs like some of those Kirk espoused have become more mainstream"
"Kirk often advocated for a return to traditional Christian gender norms reminiscent of the 1950s"
An assistant prof from Kennesaw State (where?) "considers much of Kirk's rhetoric to be hate speech" because his traditional views were espoused with "certainty and "certainty with which he delivers his remarks does lend an air of authority and credibility," So by that logic, everything anyone disagrees with on CBC is "hate speech" because it is all delivered with an air of certainty? Dirty journalism from CBC. Another day, another CBC smear job! (link in reply)"
Gurwinder on X - "If you believe Charlie Kirk deserved to die because he was “homophobic” and “transphobic”, are you going to be morally consistent, and also celebrate the deaths of Palestinians? Thought not."
Left wingers are very proud that they support "[basic] human rights" for "everyone". That suggests that they don't see those who oppose the left wing agenda as human
Thread by @jonkay on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App - "this thing where academics & Cdn journalists tweet idiotic things about assassinations…It boggles the mind. They’ve seen other ppl lose their careers & reputations over this sort of thing. But they do it anyway. It’s like some kind of self destructive tic they can’t suppress. there’s got to be something else going on psychologically aside from the ideological component. Most of us think things that we don’t say, because we realize it’s inappropriate. But in this case, you have sophisticated people making the same obvious mistake over and over….
my working theory is that these people have a strong theory of evil in the world, and when an evil thing happens to a person whom they regard as evil, and that person attracts sympathy, it short circuits their brain and overrides their normal instinct for self-preservation …. they feel compelled to announce to the world that their sympathy is counterfeit, & morally reaffirm the nature of true evil. with Gilmore, it was “that’s just a blip! soon the TRUE right wing evil will start again and it will be all the more evil because of what just happened…” With Bruce, It was “oh yeah, I know this ideologically inconvenient manifestation of evil is causing cognitive dissonance for we enlightened people, so let’s just comfort ourselves ideologically by thinking about all the right wing evil things that happened in the past” In other cases, like that batty legal-aid woman out in BC, it looks like full-blown mental health issues. Joy is prob in that category too. But there’s also a juvenile element of attention seeking. whoever can make the most insane comment gets an extra 17 likes from the fishbowl
In some cases, it should be said, academics seem genuinely shocked when their horrific comments are met with disgust by the general public. Some probably go months without talking to anybody who doesn’t think that ppl with conservative opinions should be treated ruthlessly….
Plus, they’ve constructed this whole
idiom of “resistance” and “disruption” and “direct action” …which can be extrapolated in all sorts of perverse ways. In their normal lives, they aren’t violent. But in the fantasy world of twitter, they get punch-drunk on this rhetoric
case of @atRachelGilmore is particularly interesting, because she always inserts herself as a moral protagonist. Her claimed victimhood (following backlash at her comments) isn’t just narcissism. The martyr shtick is a ritualized means of reaffirming the truth of her theory of evil. The typical assumption is that she’s just dumb. But that can’t be it. She seems to be of at least average intelligence, & the only way to explain her behaviour is that she sees her persecution as a feature not a bug. On some level, she knows what’s going to happen and wants it to happen. It’s kind of like those people we know who keep having the same dysfunctional relationship over and over. The collapse of the relationship engages some self destructive life script they need to experience for inborn psychological reasons. Twitter allows them to play out that script every single day. (There’s also the call-and-response aspect of this, where the martyr says “i fear I cannot go on. I do not have the strength.” But then the rapturous congregants yell, “oh please, Rachel! By your suffering, the stain of sin is cleaned.”)"
Usually they end up shooting the messenger, e.g. Libs of TikTok. In the left wing worldview, those who expose their hatred and hypocrisy are the evil ones